0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views7 pages

Periyar

Periyar E.V. Ramasamy was a key social reformer and politician in Southern India, known for his advocacy against caste oppression and gender inequality, significantly influencing the Dravidian movement. His life was marked by a commitment to social justice, leading initiatives like the Self Respect Movement and the Vaikkom Satyagraha, while critiquing the Indian National Congress and Brahminical dominance. Periyar's legacy continues to impact socio-political ideologies in Tamil Nadu, promoting rationalism and equality.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views7 pages

Periyar

Periyar E.V. Ramasamy was a key social reformer and politician in Southern India, known for his advocacy against caste oppression and gender inequality, significantly influencing the Dravidian movement. His life was marked by a commitment to social justice, leading initiatives like the Self Respect Movement and the Vaikkom Satyagraha, while critiquing the Indian National Congress and Brahminical dominance. Periyar's legacy continues to impact socio-political ideologies in Tamil Nadu, promoting rationalism and equality.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

22/01/2026, 19:24 Periyar E.V.

Periyar E.V. Ramasamy: Architect of Social Transformation and Political Awakening in Southern India - Political Science Solution

Periyar E.V. Ramasamy: Architect of Social


Transformation and Political Awakening in
Southern India
Periyar E.V. Ramasamy, was a pioneering social reformer and politician in
Southern India, known for his relentless advocacy against caste oppression,
gender inequality, and religious orthodoxy, leaving a lasting impact on the
Dravidian movement.
Erode Venkatappa Ramasamy, born on September 17, 1879, in Erode, Tamil
Nadu, was not just an individual but a catalyst for monumental social and
political change in Southern India. Known colloquially as “Periyar” a name
changed in 1938. His life’s journey encapsulates a fervent commitment to
eradicating caste-based discrimination and reshaping the socio-political
landscape of the region.
Periyar hailed from a prosperous business family of a backward caste,
offering him a unique perspective on the agonizing impact of social
discrimination. This firsthand experience fueled his determination to address
deep-rooted issues, including caste bias, the status of women, linguistic
rights, and reservations for backward castes in government offices. He was
also awarded with the title of “Socrates of South East Asia” by UNESCO
MANDARAM.
In 1919, Periyar joined the Indian National Congress, swiftly rising to the
presidency of the Tamil Nadu Congress Committee. His guiding principles
were service and social justice. However, encountering caste prejudices
within the Congress led him to a decisive departure in 1925, denouncing it as
a “Fortress of Brahmin Imperialism.”
Inspired by Mahatma Gandhi’s principles, Periyar spearheaded the Vaikkom
Satyagraha in 1924, successfully challenging the exclusion of lower-caste
individuals near a temple in Kerala. Despite facing imprisonment, he emerged
triumphant, earning the title of the hero of Vaikkom. His subsequent
association with the Justice Party in 1925 marked a significant shift,
eventually transforming it into the Dravida Kazhagam in 1944—a precursor to
influential political entities like DMK (1949), AIADMK, and MDMK in Tamil
Nadu.
A pivotal moment in Periyar’s life was the Kashi Pilgrimage Incident, which
prompted his embrace of atheism and a departure from religious
conventions.
[Link] 1/7
22/01/2026, 19:24 Periyar E.V. Ramasamy: Architect of Social Transformation and Political Awakening in Southern India - Political Science Solution

Major Works
Why were women enslaved?
High thoughts: Uyar Ennagal
Periyar Kalanchiyam
Periyar Warehouse
The Ramayana: True Reading
Significant Newspapers and Magazines:
Kudi Arasu: Published in 1925, Kudi Arasu was a Tamil weekly magazine
spearheaded by Periyar E. V. Ramasamy.
Revolt and Puratchi: In 1928, the English magazine “Revolt” was
introduced, followed by “Puratchi” (Revolution) in 1933.
Viduthalai: Viduthalai, associated with the Justice Party, served as a
newspaper edited by Periyar.
Pakkuthariuu (Common Sense)
Kashi Pilgrimage Incident
In 1904, E.V. Ramaswamy undertook a pilgrimage to Kashi, a sacred
destination for Hindus. Expecting a spiritually enriching experience, he was
disheartened to witness immoral activities like begging taking place in what
he considered a holy land. However, the most profound blow came when he
sought free meals at a Shiva temple but was denied because of his non-
Brahmin status. Forced to scavenge for food among discarded leftovers on
the streets, this humiliating experience shattered his perception of Kashi as
an inclusive and welcoming place. The discriminatory practices he
encountered during this pilgrimage became a turning point, leading him to
embrace atheism.
Gurukul Controversy
In 1925, Periyar confronted a contentious issue related to the Gurukulam, a
school run by Congress. He discovered that non-Brahmin boys were
prohibited from sharing meals with Brahmins, sparking outrage among
Congress workers. Despite efforts to address the matter, the discriminatory
practices persisted, widening the chasm between Brahmins and non-
Brahmins. This controversy marked a crucial moment in Periyar’s
disillusionment with the Congress, as he began accusing the party of
perpetuating Brahminical dominance and exacerbating caste-based
disparities.

[Link] 2/7
22/01/2026, 19:24 Periyar E.V. Ramasamy: Architect of Social Transformation and Political Awakening in Southern India - Political Science Solution

Varnashrama Dharma
Periyar vehemently opposed the entrenched social structure dictated by
Varnashrama Dharma, the fourfold division of castes in Indian society. Initially
aligning himself with Congress, he severed ties in 1925 upon recognizing the
party’s Brahmin-centric agenda. Whether through his involvement in the
Vaikkom Satyagraha or the Justice Party, Periyar consistently aimed at
challenging Brahmin hegemony and dismantling the hierarchical
Varnashrama Dharma. Even a meeting with Mahatma Gandhi in 1927 to
discuss their differing views on this caste-based system proved fruitless, as
their perspectives remained irreconcilably opposed.
The Self Respect Movement
Periyar initiated the Self Respect Movement also known as Dravidian
movement, with the objective of fostering social reform and upliftment. Self
respect movement was held at Chengalpattu in February 1925. His primary
concern was the exploitation and oppression faced by the lower castes,
particularly at the hands of the Brahmins (upper caste), in the guise of
religion, caste, and spirituality. According to Periyar, this systematic
mistreatment had dehumanized the majority of Dravidian people in the
South, making it an urgent issue, while he regarded the problem of colonial
subjugation as secondary.
The Self Respect Movement advocated that non-Brahmins in the Tamil
region should take pride in their Dravidian heritage, fostering a spirit of unity
to challenge Brahminical dominance. As part of this movement, Manusmriti
was publicly burned, individuals discarded caste descriptors from their
names, and weddings were organized without the involvement of priests.
Periyar attributed the introduction of an unjust and oppressive social system
to the Aryans, whom he held responsible for the prevailing inequalities.
Additionally, he criticized “Puranas” as not only being imaginary and irrational
but also morally objectionable, dismissing them as fairy tales.
Critique of Congress and Gandhi
Periyar’s criticisms extended beyond social issues to the political realm. He
believed that the Congress primarily served Brahmin interests. His opposition
to Gandhi’s reconstructed version of Varna Vyavastha stemmed from the
perception that it did not align with historical caste dynamics, interpreting

[Link] 3/7
22/01/2026, 19:24 Periyar E.V. Ramasamy: Architect of Social Transformation and Political Awakening in Southern India - Political Science Solution

Gandhian nationalism as a hegemonic project to maintain Brahmin


dominance. His bold declaration—”God, religion, Congress, and Gandhi
should be destroyed”—exemplified his unwavering stance.
Periyar E.V. Ramasamy’s enduring legacy lies in the continued influence of
the Dravidian movement in Tamil Nadu. His tireless efforts and unyielding
commitment to social justice have left an indelible mark on the socio-political
fabric of the region, shaping the trajectory of movements and political
ideologies for generations to come.
Abolition of Castes
Periyar E.V. Ramasamy was a staunch advocate for the abolition of castes,
believing in the inherent dignity and equal opportunities for all individuals. His
vision for social justice aimed to eradicate unjust discrimination rooted in
spirituality and religiosity.
He vehemently criticized Brahminism, recognizing it as a product of the
hierarchical social system known as “Varnashrama Dharma.” This system
categorized Hindu society into four castes: Brahmins (priests), Kshatriyas
(soldiers), Vaishya (traders), and Shudras (servants), establishing economic
and social privileges or restrictions based on caste hierarchy. Periyar
denounced this rigid system, highlighting its inherent flaws, such as the
inability to change one’s caste regardless of skills or merit. The Brahmins
held the highest status, considered the purest, and enjoyed supreme
authority over the other castes. Meanwhile, the lower castes, especially the
Shudras, were marginalized, deemed untouchables, forbidden from entering
temples, forced to use separate wells, and relegated to the outskirts of
villages.
Periyar questioned the efficacy of religion, scriptures, and gods that failed to
bring about positive changes in society. He contended that casteism
weakened society due to the mutual hatred it bred among its people. It was
crucial to note that his opposition was directed at Brahminism, the
foundational ideology of the caste system, rather than the Brahmin
individuals themselves.
Women’s Liberation
Periyar’s concerns extended to the subjugation of women in society. He held
women partly responsible for their oppressed conditions, attributing it to
their acceptance of limited freedom. According to him, women’s status was
even worse than that of the untouchables.
[Link] 4/7
22/01/2026, 19:24 Periyar E.V. Ramasamy: Architect of Social Transformation and Political Awakening in Southern India - Political Science Solution

Women were denied education to prevent the development of their abilities


and intelligence, perpetuating their subordination. Periyar advocated for
women to realize that civilization was about living on equal terms with men,
not merely adhering to fashionable appearances. He emphasized the need
for rigorous education, changes in marriage customs, and birth control to
uplift and liberate women. Periyar sought to replace the term ‘wedding’ with
a ‘contract for companionship in life,’ challenging traditional norms.
He criticized the hypocrisy of men who created concepts like ‘chastity’ and
labeled ‘unchaste’ women as prostitutes, applying these norms only to
women and not themselves.
Opposition to Hindi
In 1937, when Chakravarthi Rajagopalachari assumed the role of Chief
Minister of Madras Presidency, he mandated Hindi as a compulsory language
of study in schools. This decision sparked widespread protests against the
imposition of Hindi, leading to anti-Hindi agitations. The Justice Party, under
the leadership of E.V. Ramaswamy, organized a significant anti-Hindi protest
in 1938. The iconic slogan “Tamil Nadu for Tamilians” was coined by
Ramaswamy during these protests, reflecting the strong opposition to the
imposition of Hindi in educational institutions.
Impact of Soviet Union on Periyar
The visit to the Soviet Union left a profound impact on Periyar. Witnessing
the remarkable progress achieved by the Russians in agriculture and
industry, he drew parallels between the Indian situation and the Soviet model.
Inspired by the socio-economic changes implemented by the Soviet Union,
Periyar advocated for similar transformative measures in India. This influence
from the Soviet Union is considered a crucial period in Periyar’s life, leading
him to moderate his extreme radical and anti-religious stance. The exposure
to the Soviet model during this time played a role in tempering his views and
aligning them more closely with rationalism, indicating a shift in his
ideological perspective.
Rural-Urban Divide
Periyar drew attention to the imbalanced relationship between rural and
urban areas, equating the status of rural people to that of untouchables.
Villagers, akin to the untouchables, engaged in hard labor for minimum
wages, while urban dwellers exploited their produce.

[Link] 5/7
22/01/2026, 19:24 Periyar E.V. Ramasamy: Architect of Social Transformation and Political Awakening in Southern India - Political Science Solution

Advocating for a transformative change, Periyar proposed the elimination of


villages and the development of interconnected towns. He envisioned
complete urbanization with essential facilities such as schools, hospitals,
parks, cinema theaters, magistrates, and markets. For him, this
comprehensive urbanization was the key to rectifying the economic
disparities between rural and urban areas, fostering equality and progress.
Rationalism
Periyar’s philosophy was deeply rooted in rationalism, as he identified the
absence of a rational outlook as the root cause of human suffering and
societal evils. He aimed to challenge customs and traditions in Tamilian
society that were grounded in perceived ancient wisdom, practiced for
centuries, and often justified in the name of God and religious scriptures.
He urged people not to unquestionably accept practices simply because
they were old, customary, or widely accepted based on hearsay or claimed
as divine words. Instead, Periyar advocated for the application of human
reason—the distinctive aspect of humanity—to lead an ideal and proper life
based on rationalism.
Periyar rejected the concept of God, asserting that the worship of deities
stemmed from fear and dread of unknown natural phenomena that had never
revealed themselves. He believed that economic, social, and political
development could only occur through a foundation of rationalistic and
scientific thinking.
In a move that reflected his commitment to these ideals, Periyar merged the
Self Respect Movement with Communism. He founded the Self Respect
Communist Party, envisioning the nationalization of industries, railways,
banks, waterways, agricultural lands, and forests. Additionally, he advocated
for limiting working hours to 8 hours a day and improving the wages and
conditions of laborers. Although he later disbanded the Self Respect
Communist Party in favor of the Self Respect Movement, his thoughts
remained influenced by communist ideals. Periyar aimed to dismantle the
concept of private property and the right to property, aligning with his
broader vision of social equality and justice.
Three Main Controversies related to Periyar
Periyar burned the picture of God Rama. He supported the version of
Ramayana where Ravana was not evil.
Married to women of age 32 at the age of 70.
[Link] 6/7
22/01/2026, 19:24 Periyar E.V. Ramasamy: Architect of Social Transformation and Political Awakening in Southern India - Political Science Solution

UNESCO never gave him the award.


Conclusion
E.V. Ramasamy, known as Periyar, stands as a monumental figure whose life
and ideologies have left an indelible mark on the socio-political landscape of
Southern India. Born into a prosperous but socially marginalized caste, his
journey evolved into a relentless pursuit of social justice, challenging
oppressive structures ingrained in caste, gender, and rural-urban disparities.
His critique of Congress, Gandhi, and Brahminical hegemony led him to the
forefront of transformative movements. The Vaikkom Satyagraha and the
formation of Dravida Kazhagam showcased his commitment to dismantling
caste-based prejudices. Periyar’s Self Respect Movement emerged as a
powerful force, advocating pride in Dravidian heritage, burning Manusmriti,
and challenging Brahminical dominance.
Periyar’s rationalism and rejection of traditional norms, religious dogma, and
caste hierarchy laid the groundwork for a radical shift in societal paradigms.
He envisioned an egalitarian society, urging women’s liberation, economic
equality through urbanization, and the eradication of rural-urban divides.
His fusion of the Self Respect Movement with communist ideals underscores
a visionary pursuit of social equality, though the party was eventually
disbanded. Periyar’s enduring legacy resonates in the continued influence of
the Dravidian movement and the shaping of political ideologies in Tamil
Nadu.
Periyar’s life was a testament to unwavering resilience against social
injustices. His multifaceted approach—critiquing traditional norms,
championing rationalism, advocating for economic reforms, and challenging
the foundations of inequality—has left an enduring legacy, ensuring that his
ideas continue to inspire generations in the pursuit of a just and equal
society.
Previous article
Next article

[Link] 7/7

Common questions

Powered by AI

Periyar's Self Respect Movement fundamentally challenged traditional Hindu social structures by rejecting the hierarchical caste system propagated by Varnashrama Dharma, which he viewed as a mechanism of Brahminical dominance and oppression . The movement advocated for the abolition of caste, promoting equality and social justice by burning the Manusmriti, discarding caste-based surnames, and organizing marriages without the involvement of priests . It also sought to empower women by advocating for equal rights, education, and changes in marriage customs, directly opposing the entrenched patriarchy inherent in traditional Hindu norms .

Periyar E.V. Ramasamy's early experiences with caste discrimination, particularly during his pilgrimage to Kashi where he was denied free meals due to his non-Brahmin status, profoundly shaped his activism. This exposure to systemic caste bias fueled his determination to fight against caste-based oppression and advocate for social reform . These experiences led him to embrace atheism and reject religious orthodoxy, as he began to see religion as a tool for maintaining caste hierarchies . His activism was deeply rooted in challenging these social inequities, culminating in the creation of the Self Respect Movement, which sought to dismantle caste-based discrimination and promote Dravidian pride .

Periyar's educational reform proposals, which advocated for equal access to education irrespective of caste or gender, had profound implications for addressing social inequality. By arguing against the exclusionary practices prevalent in institutions like the Congress-run Gurukulam, Periyar highlighted education as a key tool for empowerment and social mobility . His emphasis on rigorous education for marginalized groups aimed to dismantle the systemic barriers that perpetuated caste and gender inequalities. These reforms were pivotal in fostering an environment where education became a democratizing force, enabling greater participation in the socio-political process and promoting an egalitarian society .

Periyar's advocacy for marriage customs revolutionized gender norms by challenging patriarchal traditions that upheld women’s subordination. He promoted the idea of marriage as a 'contract for companionship,' advocating for the removal of religious ceremonies and priestly mediation, which emphasized women's autonomy and mutual respect between partners . His emphasis on birth control and rigorous education for women further challenged existing gender norms, promoting women's liberation from societal constraints and empowering them to participate actively in society . These proposals significantly destabilized traditional gender roles, fostering a discourse on equality and autonomy in Tamil society. .

Periyar's visit to the Soviet Union significantly influenced his perspectives on social and economic reforms, as he was impressed by the Soviet model's success in agriculture and industry . This exposure prompted him to advocate for similar socio-economic transformations in India, emphasizing rationalism and scientific thinking . It strengthened his resolve to promote public ownership and the nationalization of key sectors, aligning with his vision for an egalitarian society built on rationalist principles .

Periyar's personal experiences, particularly his pilgrimage to Kashi where he faced blatant caste-based discrimination, were pivotal in shaping his atheistic beliefs. This incident exposed the hypocrisy and exclusionary nature of religious practices, leading him to question the integrity of religious institutions . His disillusionment with the perceived moral and spiritual failures of religion in addressing social inequality reinforced his rejection of deities and religious dogma. This atheism was reflected in his critique of religion as a hindrance to progress and rationality, advocating for a society guided by reason rather than faith .

Periyar's opposition to the Indian National Congress stemmed primarily from his perception that the party perpetuated Brahminical dominance and failed to address the systemic caste inequities ingrained in Indian society. His experiences with caste discrimination within Congress, such as the Gurukul Controversy where non-Brahmin boys faced segregation, reinforced his belief that Congress prioritized upper-caste interests . These concerns led him to pursue a path of social reform outside of Congress, joining and eventually transforming the Justice Party into the Dravida Kazhagam, which focused on Tamil and Dravidian identity politics .

Rationalism was central to Periyar's critique of traditional Hindu religious practices, as he believed that such practices were not grounded in reason and perpetuated societal evils like caste discrimination. He argued that customs and traditions justified by religious scriptures often lacked a rational basis and were used to maintain social hierarchies . By advocating for a rationalist worldview, Periyar sought to dismantle the fear and superstition surrounding religious norms and promote an inquiry-led approach to life, which he saw as essential for human progress and social justice .

Periyar’s work with the Justice Party was significant in the broader landscape of South Indian politics as it marked the consolidation of non-Brahmin leadership and the promotion of Dravidian identity. By transforming the Justice Party into the Dravida Kazhagam, Periyar provided an ideological foundation for subsequent Dravidian movements such as DMK and AIADMK, which have played pivotal roles in Tamil Nadu politics . His leadership highlighted issues of caste-based discrimination and linguistic rights, setting the stage for a political discourse centered around regional identity and social justice that continues to influence South Indian politics .

Periyar promoted Dravidian identity as a strategic response to what he viewed as the cultural and linguistic imposition of Hindi and North Indian dominance in Tamil Nadu. His leadership in the anti-Hindi protests of 1938 underscored his opposition to the imposition of Hindi as a compulsory language, which he saw as an attempt to undermine Tamil culture and identity . The Dravidian movement, under Periyar’s guidance, emphasized pride in one's Tamil and Dravidian heritage as a counterbalance to perceived attempts at cultural homogenization and as a means to resist Brahminical control that often accompanied such impositions .

You might also like