Polity Notes
Polity Notes
Our Constitution has adopted the best features of most of the major constitutions of the world as per
the needs of the country. Though borrowed from almost every constitution in the world, the constitution
of India has several salient features that distinguish it from the constitutions of other countries.
Constitutions are classified into written, like the American Constitution, or unwritten, like the
British Constitution.
The Constitution of India has the distinction of being the lengthiest and detailed Constitutional
document the world has so far produced. In other words, the Constitution of India is the
lengthiest of all the written constitutions of the world.
It is a very comprehensive, elaborate and detailed document.
The factors that contributed to the elephantine size of the Indian Constitution are:
o Geographical factors, that is, the vastness of the country and its diversity.
o Historical factors, for instance, the influence of the Government of India Act of 1935,
which was bulky.
o Single constitution for both the Centre and the states.
o The dominance of legal luminaries in the Constituent Assembly.
The Constitution of India contains not only the fundamental principles of governance but also
detailed administrative provisions.
Both justiciable and non-justiciable rights are included in the Constitution.
2. Drawn from Various Sources
The Constitution of India has borrowed most of its provisions from the constitutions of various
other countries, as well as from the Government of India Act of 1935 [About 250 provisions of
the 1935 Act have been included in the Constitution].
Dr B R Ambedkar proudly acclaimed that the Constitution of India has been framed after
'ransacking all the known Constitutions of the world'.
The structural part of the Constitution is, to a large extent, derived from the Government of
India Act of 1935.
The philosophical part of the Constitution (Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of
State Policy) derive their inspiration from the American and Irish Constitutions, respectively.
The political part of the Constitution (the principle of Cabinet government and the relations
between the executive and the legislature) have been largely drawn from the British
Constitution.
The Constitution of India has opted for the British Parliamentary System of Government rather
than the American Presidential system of government.
The parliamentary system is based on the principle of cooperation and coordination between
the legislative and executive organs while the presidential system is based on the doctrine of
separation of powers between the two organs.
The parliamentary system is also known as the 'Westminster' model of government, responsible
government and cabinet government.
The Constitution establishes the parliamentary system not only at the Centre but also in the
States.
In a parliamentary system, the role of the Prime Minister has become so significant, and
therefore it is called a 'Prime Ministerial Government'.
The doctrine of the sovereignty of Parliament is associated with the British Parliament, while the
principle of judicial supremacy with that of the American Supreme Court.
Just as the Indian parliamentary system differs from the British system, the scope of judicial
review power of the Supreme court in India is narrower than that of what exists in the US.
This is because the American Constitution provides for 'due process of law' against that of
'procedure established by law' contained in the Indian Constitution (Article 21).
Therefore, the framers of the Indian Constitution have preferred a proper synthesis between the
British principle of parliamentary sovereignty and the American principle of Judicial supremacy.
The Supreme Court can declare the parliamentary laws as unconstitutional through its power of
judicial review.
The Parliament can amend the major portion of the Constitution through its constituent power.
7. Rule Of Law
According to this axiom, people are ruled by law but not by men, that is, the basic truism that no
man is infallible. The axiom is vital to a democracy.
More important is the meaning that law is the sovereign in democracy.
The chief ingredient of law is custom which is nothing but the habitual practices and beliefs of
common people over a long number of years.
In the final analysis, rule of law means the sovereignty of the common man’s collective wisdom.
Apart from this crucial meaning, rule of law means a few more things like
o There is no room for arbitrariness
o Each individual enjoys some fundamental rights, and
o The highest judiciary is the final authority in maintaining the sanctity of the law of the
land.
The Constitution of India has incorporated this principle in Part III and in order to provide
meaning to Article 14 (all are equal before the law and all enjoy equal protection of
laws), promotion of Lok Adalats and the venture of the Supreme court known as “public interest
litigation” have been implemented.
Also, as per today’s law of the land, any litigant can appeal to the presiding judicial authority to
argue the case by himself or seek legal assistance with the help of the judiciary.
9. Fundamental Rights
Part III of the Indian Constitution guarantees six fundamental rights to all Citizens.
Fundamental Rights are one of the important features of the Indian Constitution.
The Constitution contains the basic principle that every individual is entitled to enjoy certain
rights as a human being, and the enjoyment of such rights does not depend upon the will of any
majority or minority.
No majority has the right to abrogate such rights.
The fundamental rights are meant for promoting the idea of political democracy.
They operate as limitations on the tyranny of the executive and arbitrary laws of the legislature.
They are justiciable in nature, that is, enforceable by the courts for their violation.
According to Dr B R Ambedkar, the Directive Principles of State Policy is a 'novel feature' of the
Indian Constitution.
They are enumerated in Part IV of the Constitution.
The Directive Principles were included in our Constitution in order to provide social and
economic justice to our people.
Directive Principles aim at establishing a welfare state in India where there will be no
concentration of wealth in the hands of a few.
They are non-justiciable in nature.
In the Minerva Mills case (1980), the Supreme Court held that 'the Indian Constitution is
founded on the bedrock of the balance between the Fundamental Rights and the Directive
Principles'.
The original constitution did not provide for the fundamental duties of the citizens.
Fundamental Duties were added to our Constitution by the 42nd Amendment Act of 1976 on the
recommendation of the Swaran Singh Committee.
It lays down a list of ten Fundamental Duties for all citizens of India.
Later, the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act of 2002 added one more fundamental duty.
While the rights are given as guarantees to the people, the duties are obligations that every
citizen is expected to perform.
However, like the Directive Principles of State Policy, the duties are also non-justiciable in
nature.
There is a total of 11 Fundamental duties altogether.
In a federal state usually, the citizens enjoy double citizenship as is the case in the USA.
In India, there is only single citizenship.
It means that every Indian is a citizen of India, irrespective of the place of his/her residence or
place of birth.
He/she is not a citizen of the Constituent State like Jharkhand, Uttaranchal or Chattisgarh to
which he/she may belong but remains a citizen of India.
All the citizens of India can secure employment anywhere in the country and enjoy all the rights
equally in all the parts of India.
The Constitution makers deliberately opted for single citizenship to eliminate regionalism and
other disintegrating tendencies.
Single citizenship has undoubtedly forged a sense of unity among the people of India.
15. Independent Bodies
The Indian constitution not only provides for the legislative, executive and judicial organs of the
government (Central and state) but also establishes certain independent bodies.
They are envisaged by the Constitution as the bulwarks of the democratic system of
Government in India.
The Constitution makers also foresaw that there could be situations when the government could
not be run as in ordinary times.
To cope with such situations, the Constitution elaborates on emergency provisions.
There are three types of emergency
o Emergency caused by war, external aggression or armed rebellion [Aricle 352]
o Emergency arising out of the failure of constitutional machinery in states [Article 356 &
365]
o Financial emergency [Article 360].
The rationality behind the incorporation of these provisions is to safeguard the sovereignty,
unity, integrity and security of the country, the democratic political system and the Constitution.
During an emergency, the central government becomes all-powerful and the states go into total
control of the centre.
This kind of transformation of the political system from federal (during normal times) to unitary
(during emergency) is a unique feature of the Indian Constitution.
Originally, the Indian Constitution provided for a dual polity and contained provisions with regard
to the organisation and powers of the Centre and the States.
Later, the 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts (1992) have added a third-tier of
government (that is, Local Government), which is not found in any other Constitution of the
world.
The 73rd Amendment Act of 1992 gave constitutional recognition to the panchayats (rural local
governments) by adding a new Part IX and a new schedule 11 to the Constitution.
Similarly, the 74th Amendment Act of 1992 gave constitutional recognition to the municipalities
(urban local government) by adding a new Part IX-A and a new schedule 12 to the Constitution.
18. Co-operative Societies
The 97th Constitutional Amendment Act of 2011 gave a constitutional status and protection of
cooperative societies.
In this context, it made the following three changes in the Constitution:
o It made the right to form cooperative societies a fundamental right (Article 19).
o It included a new Directive principle of State Policy on the promotion of cooperative
societies (Article 43-B).
o It added a new Part IX-B in the Constitution, which is entitled "The Co-operative
Societies" [Articles 243-ZH to 243-ZT].
The new Part IX-B contains various provisions to ensure that the cooperative societies in the
country function in a democratic, professional, autonomous and economically sound manner.
It empowers the Parliament in respect of multi-state cooperative societies and the state
legislatures in respect of other cooperative societies to make the appropriate law.
Philosophy of Constitution
On January 22, 1947, the Constituent Assembly adopted the Objectives Resolution drafted by
Jawaharlal Nehru. The Objectives Resolution contained the fundamental propositions of the
Constitution and set forth the political ideas that should guide its deliberations.
The philosophy of a Constitution consists of the ideals for which the constitution stands and the policies
that the Constitution enjoins upon the rulers of the Community to follow. The Constitution of India
reflects the impact of our ideology in the following spheres :
(i) Secularism: Secularism is the hallmark of the Indian Constitution. People professing different
religions have the freedom of religious worship of their own choice. All religions have been treated
alike. The fact appreciated in India was that all religions love humanity and uphold the truth. All the
social reformers and political leaders of modern Indian have advocated religious tolerance, religious
freedom and equal respect for all religions. This very principle has been adopted in the Constitution of
India where all religions enjoy equal respect. However, the word 'secularism' was nowhere mentioned
in the Constitution as adopted in 1949. The word 'secularism' has now been added to the Preamble to
the Constitution through the 42nd Amendment passed in 1976.
(ii) Democracy: We have borrowed the modern form of democracy from the West. Under this system,
democracy means the periodic responsibilities of the Government to go to the people. For this purpose;
elections have been held every five-year to elect a Government by the people. However, democracy
covers even the economic and social aspects of life. This aspect of democracy is well-reflected in the
Directive Principles of State Policy. They are aimed at human welfare, co-operation, international
brotherhood and so on.
(iii) Sarvodaya: Sarvodaya refers to the welfare of all. It is different from the welfare of the majority. It
seeks to achieve the welfare of all, without exception. It is referred to as Ram Rajya. The concept of
Sarvodaya was developed by Mahatma Gandhi Acharya Vinoba Bhave and J. Narayan under which
the material, spiritual, moral and mental development of everyone is sought to be achieved. The
Preamble to the Indian Constitution and the Directive Principles of State Policy represent this ideal.
(iv) Socialism: Socialism is not new to India. Vedanta's philosophy has socialism in it. The national
struggle for freedom had this aim also in view. Jawaharlal Nehru referred to himself as a socialist and
republican. Almost all the parties in India profess to promote democratic socialism. These principles are
included in the Directive Principles of State Policy. However, to lay emphasis on this aspect, the word
'socialism' was specifically added to the Preamble to the Constitution through the 42nd Amendment.
(v) Humanism: Humanism is a salient feature of Indian ideology. Indian ideology regards the whole of
humanity as one big family. It believes in resolving international disputes through mutual negotiations.
This is what we find in the Directive Principles of State Policy.
(vi) Decentralization: Decentralization is another aspect of Sarvodaya. Indian has always practised
decentralization through the Panchayat system. Mahatma Gandhi also advocated decentralization. It is
on this account that he is regarded as a philosophical anarchist. We have introduced the Panchayati
Raj system in India to achieve the objective of decentralisation. The concept of cottage industries as
laid down in the Directive Principles of State Policy also refers to decentralization.
(vii) Liberalism: Liberalism does not refer to the Western concept of liberalism. It refers, in the Indian
context, to self-government, secularism, nationalism, economic reforms, constitutional approach,
representative institutions etc. all these concepts were advocated by the modern Indian leaders.
(viii) Mixed Economy: Co-existence is a salient feature of our ideology. Co-existence has manifested
itself through a mixed system of economy. In this system, we have allowed both the private and public
sectors of the economy to work simultaneously. Large scale and essential industries have been put in
the public sector.
(ix) Gandhism: Gandhism represents an ethical and moral India. Gandhi set a new example of fighting
foreign rule through non-violence. He taught the importance of non-violence and truth. He advocated
untouchability, cottage industry, prohibition, adult education and the uplift of villages. He wanted a
society free of exploitation and decentralized in character. All these Gandhian principles have found an
honourable place in the Constitution of India.
UPSC Civil Services Examination
Political Science & International Relations
Topic: Sources of Indian Constitution – Indian Polity Notes
As a part of Indian Polity of IAS Exam, it makes an important section. Hence, this article will talk about
Preamble to the Constitution and provide you with preamble of Indian constitution notes PDF. You can
also read about the Objective Resolution which is, in modified version, reflected in the Preamble of
India.
Aspirants can check their preparation by subscribing to UPSC Prelims Test Series 2020 now!!
To complement your preparation for the upcoming exam, check the following links:
o UPSC Previous Year Question Papers
o Current Affairs
o UPSC Notes PDF
o IAS Mock Tests
o NCERT Notes PDF
In 1946, Objective Resolution was moved by Jawaharlal Nehru, describing constitutional structure. on
1947 (22nd January) it was adopted. It shaped the Constitution of India and its modified version is
reflected in the Preable of the Indian Constitution. The basic tenets that the objective resolution
highlighted were:
The source of the Indian Constitution, nature of the Indian State, the objectives of the Constitution of
India & the date of adoption of the Indian State, are four main ingredients of the Indian Preamble which
you can read about in the table below:
1. Sovereign
2. Socialist
3. Secular
4. Democratic
5. Republic
6. Justice
7. Liberty
8. Equality
9. Fraternity
UPSC Preparation:
The information taken from this article will be useful in the Indian Polity segment of the IAS
Exam.
Sovereign Republic
The Preamble begins with the words, "We, the people of India....", thus clearly indicating the
source of all authority under the Constitution. The Preamble establishes the ultimate sovereignty
of the people of India on whose authority the Constitution rests. It points out that the
Constitution of India has been ordained by the people of India through their representatives in
the Constituent Assembly.
In the present times, the term 'sovereignty' may be losing rigid connotations of "supreme and
absolute power acknowledging no superior" -no modern state can be considered sovereign in
that sense. However, through the words of the Preamble, what is sought to be established is the
oneness of the people of India (not the people of different states but of one nation), that the
sovereignty vests in the collectivity, and the that the people of India are not subordinate to any
external authority. With the enactment of the Constitution India was no longer a 'dominion' it was
a 'republic'.
India is a republic in that sense. From January 26, 1950, when the Constitution commenced,
India ceased to owe allegiance to the British crown. India has a President as head of the Union,
elected indirectly for a fixed term by the people's representatives. All citizens are equal in law,
there is no privileged class, and every citizen has the right to try for any public office irrespective
of caste, race, sex or religion.
Despite declaring itself a republic India remained a member of the Commonwealth of Nations.
Indeed the group of nations accommodated India's status as a sovereign independent republic
owing no allegiance to the British Crown: the 'British Commonwealth of Nations' became simply
'Commonwealth of Nations'. The king or Queen would be the 'symbolic' head of the
Commonwealth as far as India was concerned, and the decisions at the conferences of the
Commonwealth will not be binding on Indians. India's conduct would be based on 'free will'. The
decision to remain in the Commonwealth was in keeping with the idea of promoting international
cooperation and peace - a concept expressed in our Constitution.
Democracy
The term 'democracy' has assumed different connotations for different people. But common to
all forms of democracies in the participation of the people directly or indirectly. India has
adopted the representative parliamentary democracy. The Constitution makes no provision for
direct control by the people through such devices as 'referendum' and 'initiative'. However, the
people of India exercise their sovereigns through a Parliament at the Centre and a legislature in
each State elected on the basis of universal adult franchise. The Executive is responsible for the
popular house of the Legislature. Beyond political democracy, the Preamble also envisages
social and economic democracy. Equality in the political sphere gives each adult citizen the
power to vote freely. Equality must also pervade society and economic conditions, as far as
possible. Dr Ambedkar considered social and economic democracy to be the real goals to strive
for.
Jawaharlal Nehru too felt that political structure would weaken and disintegrate if
socio-economic problems like abjure poverty and gross inequalities are not tackled and
removed. A vote, after all, does not mean much to a starving person. It is in this context that the
Preamble speaks of justice, equality, liberty and fraternity.
Justice
The Preamble speaks of social, economic and political justice. The concept of justice goes
beyond its narrow legal connotation. Significantly the words 'social' and 'economic occur before
the word 'political1.
Social justice implies that discrimination on the basis of birth, caste, race, sex or religion should
cease. To that end, all citizens should enjoy equal opportunities in the matter of public
appointment. It is the good of all people that the Government must strive to achieve. The
concept of a welfare state as envisaged in the Directive Principles is an embodiment of
guidelines for ensuring the social justice expected in the Preamble.
Economic justice implies that the gap between the rich and the poor is bridged, and the
exploitation ceases. Removal of poverty is to be achieved not by taking away assets from those
who have but by ensuring a more equitable distribution of national wealth ana1 resources
among those who contribute to its creation. This the Directive Principles call upon the state to
try and secure ownership and control over resources to subserve the common good, reduce the
concentration of wealth, ensure equal pay for equal work, and see that people, especially
women and children, are not abused or forced by economic want into work unsuitable for their
age or strength.
Political justice implies that all citizens should have an equal opportunity to participate in the
political system. One person-one vote is ensured irrespective not only of caste, sex or religion
but also of proprietary or educational qualifications. It is the basis of the political democracy
envisaged in the Constitution.
Liberty
Democracy is closely connected with the idea of liberty; certain minimal rights must be enjoyed
by every person in a community for a free and civilized existence. These basic rights are spelt
out by the Preamble as freedom of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship. The chapter
on Fundamental Rights guarantees this freedom explicitly, subject to certain regulations; after
all, liberty is not to degenerate into licence if democracy is to survive.
Equality
Rights have no meaning if they cannot be enjoyed equally by all members of the community. To
ensure that it is possible for all to enjoy these rights, social and economic equality is sought to
be achieved. The Fundamental Rights enjoin the State not to discriminate between citizen and
citizen simply on the basis of caste, race, sex or religion. Public places are open to all citizens,
titles of honour stand abolished, untouchability is abolished, among
other things. The rule of law is to prevail: all citizens are equal before the law and enjoy equal
protection of the laws of the land. Political equality is provided by the principle of universal adult
franchise and by allowing, at least in principle, any citizen the opportunity to participate in the
process of governance. Economically, the same ability and work entitle persons to the same
salary. The exploitation of an individual or group is to be removed.
Fraternity
A democratic system would function in a healthy manner only if there is a spirit of brotherhood,
of oneness, among the people of the land. India being a land of immense diversity is all the
more in need of this spirit of unity - the sense of belonging to one nation. The principle of
common citizenship is directed towards strengthening this sense of 'unity and integrity' of the
nation. Fraternity is also sought to be promoted by ensuring equal rights to all. Fraternity, said
DR. Ambedkar, "is the principle which gives unity and solidarity to social life". It is the feeling
that will protect the unity of India against external attack or disintegration through internal unrest
born of social, political and economic causes.
Fraternity, however, is not possible unless the dignity of each individual is preserved and
respected. Maintaining this dignity requires the guarantee of certain minimal justiciable rights to
each individual. The ensure that an individual is free from want and misery - without which
freedom, ideas of self-respect and dignity are meaningless- the Directive Principles have been
framed calling upon the State to form its policies to benefit all citizens equally in the matter of
providing adequate means of livelihood. The State is also asked to provide just and humane
conditions of work and create conditions in which a decent standard of life and full enjoyment of
leisure and social and cultural opportunities become possible for all the people of this land. It is
in keeping with the principle of individual dignity that the practice of untouchability has been
abolished by the Constitution. In the context of fraternity, it may also be mentioned that India's
Constitution goes beyond national boundaries, and speaks of the ideal of universal brotherhood,
an international fraternity with all nations and peoples coexisting in peace and amity.
Socialism
While the original Constitution did not mention any particular ideology, it did give expression to
the resolve of securing the citizen's economic justice and equality of opportunity. This is the
essence of socialism. The word 'socialist' was introduced in the Preamble by the 42nd
Amendment. The term, however, is not defined in the Constitution. It may be pointed out that
the socialism envisaged in India does not mean the abolition of private property or
nationalization of all means of production. Thus a 'mixed economy' was envisaged, along with
the provision of equal opportunity, the abolition of vested interests, and the elimination of
inequality in income and status and standards of living. In the present context of economic
liberalization, however, the socialist credentials of our State may well be questioned.
Secularism
The term 'secular' was inserted in the Preamble only in 1976, but the state envisaged by the
Constitution was always a secular state - it could not have been otherwise in a country of such
vast size and diversity of culture and religions. Indeed, the fraternity and unity of the country
could be built only on a secular basis. It may be relevant to point out in this context that the
western concept of secularism implying strict state neutrality in matters of religion cannot be
practised in India with its pluralistic society. State intervention can become necessary to lawfully
regulate or remove pernicious or exploitative practices in the name of religion. However, in the
present socio-politics situation in the country, even those who could be expected to behave in a
responsible manner are not above exploiting religious sentiments for selfish and short-term
political interests.
The term 'secular', has not been defined in the Constitution but its operative meaning may be
drawn from the different provisions of the Constitution. Discrimination on the basis of religion is
forbidden to the State. Equality is assured to all irrespective of religion. Freedom of faith, belief
and worship is allowed to all. The State is to be impartial towards all religions. Furthermore, the
state does not uphold any particular religion as the state religion but protects all regions equally.
Important Amendments in Indian Constitution
How many amendments are there in the Indian Constitution? There are 106 amendment acts as of
September 2023 that are made in the Indian Constitution over time. All these amendments have brought
significant changes in the course of Indian Polity. The topic, 'Important Amendments in Indian
Constitution,' comes under the GS-II syllabus of the IAS Exam. Get the list of major amendments to the
Indian Constitution in this article.
Important amendments brought in the Indian Constitution are mentioned below (Amendment of Indian
Constitution):
Note:
• Fourth Amendment Act, 1955 included some more Acts in the Ninth Schedule
• 17th Amendment Act, 1964 included 44 more Acts in the Ninth Schedule
• 29th Amendment Act, 1972 included two Kerala Acts on land reforms in the Ninth Schedule
• 34th Amendment Act, 1974 included twenty more land tenure and land reforms acts of various states in
the Ninth Schedule
Three more grounds of restrictions on Article 19 (1) [Freedom of speech and expression] were added:
• Public order
• Friendly relations with foreign states
• Incitement to an offence
Introduced the validity of the state’s move to nationalize any business or trade and the same to not be invalid on
the grounds of violation of the right to trade and business
Second Amendment Act, 1952
The scale of representation in the Lok Sabha was readjusted stating that 1 member can represent even more than
7.5 lakh people.
Abolition of Class A, B, C and D states - 14 States and 6 Union Territories were formed
Introduction of Union Territories
Ninth Amendment Act, 1960
Adjustments to Indian Territory as a result of an agreement with Pakistan (Indo-Pak Agreement 1958):
Candidates can read about these National Commissions from the links provided below:
70-member legislative assembly and a 7-member council of ministers were established Delhi
71st Amendment Act, 1992
Konkani, Manipuri and Nepali languages were included in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution.
IAS Exam aspirants might want to learn about EWS Criteria for UPSC which they can check in the
linked article.
Q. Which provision given below can be amended by a simple majority of the parliament?
Answer: 4
Q. The process of amendment of the Indian Constitution is taken from which of the following countries?
1. Japan
2. Britain
3. South Africa
4. USA
Answer: 3
Q. Which of the following Constitutional Amendment Act amended the age of voting from 21 to 18?
1. 7th
2. 9th
3. 61st
4. 86th
Answer: 3
Q. In which Constitutional Amendment Act, Sikkim was made an associate-State with Indian Union?
Answer: 1
Q. Which article of the Constitution of India safeguards one’s right to marry the person of one’s choice?
1. Article 19
2. Article 21
3. Article 25
4. Article 29
Answer: 2
Q. Which of the following is true about the 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976?
Answer: 4
25 Important Supreme Court Judgements for UPSC
25 Most Important Supreme Court Judgements
Case Relevance
A.K. Gopalan Case SC contented that there was no violation of Fundamental Rights enshrined in
(1950) Articles 13, 19, 21 and 22 under the provisions of the Preventive Detention Act, if
the detention was as per the procedure established by law. Here, the SC took a
narrow view of Article 21.
Shankari Prasad Case This case dealt with the amendability of Fundamental Rights (the First
(1951) Amendment’s validity was challenged). The SC contended that the Parliament’s
power to amend under Article 368 also includes the power to amend the
Fundamental Rights guaranteed in Part III of the Constitution.
Berubari Union case This case was regarding the Parliament’s power to transfer the territory of Berubai
(1960) to Pakistan. The Supreme Court examined Article 3 in detail and held that the
Parliament cannot make laws under this article in order to execute the Nehru-
Noon agreement. Hence, the 9th Amendment Act was passed to enforce the
agreement.
Golaknath case (1967) The questions in this case were whether amendment is a law; and whether
Fundamental Rights can be amended or not. SC contented that Fundamental
Rights are not amenable to the Parliamentary restriction as stated in Article 13,
and that to amend the Fundamental rights a new Constituent Assembly would be
required. Also stated that Article 368 gives the procedure to amend the
Constitution but does not confer on Parliament the power to amend the
Constitution.
Kesavananda Bharati This judgement defined the basic structure of the Constitution. The SC held that
case (1973) although no part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, was beyond
the Parliament’s amending power, the “basic structure of the Constitution could
not be abrogated even by a constitutional amendment.” This is the basis in Indian
law in which the judiciary can strike down any amendment passed by Parliament
that is in conflict with the basic structure of the Constitution.
Indira Nehru Gandhi The SC applied the theory of basic structure and struck down Clause(4) of article
v. Raj Narain case 329-A, which was inserted by the 39th Amendment in 1975 on the grounds that it
(1975) was beyond the Parliament’s amending power as it destroyed the Constitution’s
basic features.
Maneka Gandhi A main issue in this case was whether the right to go abroad is a part of the Right
case (1978) to Personal Liberty under Article 21. The SC held that it is included in the Right to
Personal Liberty. The SC also ruled that the mere existence of an enabling law
was not enough to restrain personal liberty. Such a law must also be “just, fair and
reasonable.”
Minerva Mills case This case again strengthens the Basic Structure doctrine. The judgement struck
(1980) down 2 changes made to the Constitution by the 42nd Amendment Act 1976,
declaring them to be violative of the basic structure. The judgement makes it clear
that the Constitution, and not the Parliament is supreme.
Waman Rao Case The SC again reiterated the Basic Structure doctrine. It also drew a line of
(1981) demarcation as April 24th, 1973 i.e., the date of the Kesavananda Bharati
judgement, and held that it should not be applied retrospectively to reopen the
validity of any amendment to the Constitution which took place prior to that date.
Shah Bano Begum Milestone case for Muslim women’s fight for rights. The SC upheld the right to
case (1985) alimony for a Muslim woman and said that the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
is applicable to all citizens irrespective of their religion. This set off a political
controversy and the government of the day overturned this judgement by passing
the Muslim Women (Protection on Divorce Act), 1986, according to which
alimony need be given only during the iddat period (in tune with the Muslim
personal law).
MC Mehta and Union This case dealt with 3 issues: Scope of Article 32; rule of Absolute Liability or
Of India (1986) Rylands vs Fletcher to be followed; issue of compensation. SC held that its power
under Article 32 is not restricted to preventive measures, but also remedial
measures when rights are violated. It also held that in the case of industries
engaged in hazardous or inherently dangerous activities, Absolute Liability was to
be followed. Finally, it also said that the amount of compensation must be
correlated to the magnitude and capacity of the industry so that it will be a
deterrent.
Indra Sawhney and SC examined the scope and extent of Article 16(4), which provides for the
Union of India (1992) reservation of jobs in favour of backward classes. It upheld the constitutional
validity of 27% reservation for the OBCs with certain conditions (like creamy
layer exclusion, no reservation in promotion, total reserved quota should not
exceed 50%, etc.)
S. R. Bommai case In this judgement, the SC tried to curb the blatant misuse of Article 356 (regarding
(1994) the imposition of President’s Rule on states).
Vishaka and State of This case dealt with sexual harassment at the workplace. In the judgement, the SC
Rajasthan (1997) gave a set of guidelines for employers – as well as other responsible persons or
institutions – to immediately ensure the prevention of sexual harassment. These
are called ‘Vishaka Guidelines’. These were to be considered law until appropriate
legislation was enacted.
Samatha and State of This judgement nullified all mining leases granted by the Andhra Pradesh State
Andhra Pradesh government in the Scheduled areas and asked it to stop all mining operations. It
(1997) declared that forest land, tribal land, and government land in scheduled areas
could not be leased to private companies or non-tribal for industrial operations.
Such activity is only permissible to a government undertaking and tribal people.
Lily Thomas v Union Here, the SC held that the second marriage of a Hindu man without divorcing the
of India (2000) first wife, even if the man had converted to Islam, is void unless the first marriage
had been dissolved according to the Hindu Marriage Act.
I.R Coelho and State This judgement held that if a law is included in the 9th Schedule of the Indian
of Tamil Nadu 2007 Constitution, it can still be examined and confronted in court. The 9th Schedule of
the Indian Constitution contains a list of acts and laws which cannot be challenged
in a court of law. The Waman Rao ruling ensured that acts and laws mentioned in
the IX schedule till 24 April 1973, shall not be changed or challenged, but any
attempt to amend or add more acts to that schedule will suffer close inspection and
examination by the judiciary system.
Pedophilia case (2011) The SC restored the conviction and sentence of 6-year (RI) rigorous imprisonment
imposed on 2 UK nationals who were acquitted by the Bombay High Court in a
paedophilia case. The court said that “the sexual abuse of children is one of the
most heinous crimes.”
Aruna Shanbaug The SC ruled that individuals had a right to die with dignity, allowing
Case (2011) passive euthanasia with guidelines. The need to reform India’s laws on euthanasia
was triggered by the tragic case of Aruna Shanbaug who lay in a vegetative state
(blind, paralysed and deaf) for 42 years.
NOTA judgement This judgement introduced the NOTA (None-Of-The-Above) option for Indian
(2013) voters.
Lily Thomas and The SC ruled that any MLA, MLC or MP who was found guilty of a crime and
Union Of India (2013) given a minimum of 2 year imprisonment would cease to be a member of the
House with immediate effect.
Nirbhaya Case (2014) Introduction of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 and definition of rape
under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, the Indian
Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Code of Criminal Procedures,
1973.
National Legal This case resulted in the recognition of transgender persons as a third gender. The
Services Authority SC also instructed the government to treat them as minorities and expand the
and Union of India reservations in education, jobs, education, etc.
(2014)
Triple Talaq The SC outlawed the backward practice of instant ‘triple talaq’, which permitted
Judgement (2016) Muslim men to unilaterally end their marriages by uttering the word “talaq” three
times without making any provision for maintenance or alimony. Read about
the Triple Talaq Bill, 2019.
Right To Privacy The SC declared the right to privacy as a Fundamental Right protected under the
(2017) Indian Constitution.
Repealing Section 377 The SC ruled that Section 377 was unconstitutional “in so far as it criminalises
(2018) consensual sexual conduct between adults of the same sex.”
L Chandra Kumar The SC ruled that the power of judicial review vested in the Supreme Court and
Case (1997) High Courts by Articles 32 and 226 respectively is a part of the basic structure of
the Constitution.
Puttuswamy Case This SC judgement protects individual rights against the invasion of one’s privacy.
(2017)
Habeas Corpus Case A much-criticised judgement of the SC, in which the majority ruling went against
(1976) individual freedom and seemed to favour the state. Justice Khanna’s dissent is also
well-known.
Romesh Thapar Case Here, the SC held that the freedom of speech and expression includes freedom of
(1950) propagation of ideas that can only be ensured by circulation.
For more details on the scheduled languages in India, aspirants can refer to the Indian Ministry
of Home Affairs’ Department of Official Language Website
([Link]
Special Directives
The Constitution of India ([Link]
contains certain special directives to protect the interests of linguistic minorities and to
promote the development of Hindi language. The provisions are as followings:
1. Every aggrieved person has the right to submit a representation for the redress of any
grievance to any officer or authority of the Union or a state in of the languages used in the
Union or in the state, as the case may be. This means that a representation cannot be rejected
on the ground that it is not an official language.
2. Every stat and a local authority in the state should provide adequate facilities for instruction
in the mother-tongue at the primary stage of education to children belonging to linguistic
minority groups. The president can issue necessary directions for this purposes.
A language must have its early texts recorded history over a period of 1500-2000 years
So far, as of 2016, six languages have been granted classical language status. Tamil was the
first language granted in 2004 while Odia was the latest to be conferred classical language
status in 2014.
Once a language is declared classical, it gets financial assistance for setting up a centre of
excellence for the study of that language and also opens up an avenue for two major awards
for scholars of eminence.
Conclusion
Learning about 22 languages that are officially a part of the Indian Constitution is important for
UPSC 2023 aspirants. You should know about the year of recognition and the chronology of the
languages under the 8th schedule of the Indian Constitution so as to answer questions asked in
UPSC Prelims.
Aspirants reading, ‘8th Schedule of the Indian Constitution,’ can also read similar Polity topics
linked in the table below:
Ans. The 8th Schedule of the Indian Constitution deals with the official languages in India. 22
official languages have been mentioned in the Indian Constitution.
Q2 Q 2. Why English is not included in the 8th Schedule of the Indian Constitution?
Ans. The Eighth Schedule to the Constitution of India lists the official languages of the
Republic of India and English is not one of them. At the time of writing the Constitution of
India, there were only 14 languages mentioned in the 8th schedule. The others were added
through various amendments and English was never one of them.
There are a total of 121 languages and 270 mother tongues. The 22 languages specified in
the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution of India are given in Part A and languages other
than those specified in the Eighth Schedule (numbering 99) are given in Part B.
As per the Constitution of India, there is no National Language of India. After independence,
the Constitution makers had a problem of selecting a national language which can unite a
country because there were more than 1,600 languages spoken in different parts of the
country.
UPSC Preparation:
Documents Required for UPSC Exam Language Papers in UPSC – Tips to Study
([Link] ([Link]
prep/documents-required-for-upsc- tackle-compulsory-indian-language-paper-
exam/) in-upsc-mains/)
The original Constitution had 395 Articles in 22 Parts and 8 Schedules. Later, four more Parts, four more
Schedules and more Articles were added (1 Part was later repealed). Also, there have been 104
Amendments to the Indian Constitution (as of January 2020).
For more on the Indian Constitution and related topics, please check the links in the table below.
II Citizenship 5 – 11
Repealed by the Constitution (7th Amendment) Act, Article 238 omitted due to the
VII
1956 reorganisation of states
XIV Services under the Union and the States 308 – 323
You can read more on Part XXI of the Constitution in the link.
Parts added by Amendments
Three Parts were added to the Constitution which had 22 Parts at its commencement. Currently, there are
25 Parts to the Indian Constitution.
Part IV-A was added by the 42nd Amendment (1976) to the Constitution. This Part deals with
the Fundamental Duties.
Part XIV-A was also added by the 42nd Amendment. This Part contains articles on Tribunals.
Part IX-A was added by the 74th Amendment Act (1992). This Part deals with Municipalities.
Part IX-B was added by the 97th Amendment Act (2011) and deals with the co-operative societies.
Part VII (dealing with Part – B states) was deleted by the 7th Amendment Act (1956).
The Union and its Territory: Part I (Articles 1- 4)
[Link]/union-and-its-territory
What does the constitution speak about the union i.e., India and its territories? Let us
examine in detail.
Part I of Indian Constitution is titled The Union and its Territory. It includes articles from 1-
4. Part I is a compilation of laws pertaining to the constitution of India as a country and
the union of states that it is made of.
This part of the constitution contains the law in the establishment, renaming, merging or
altering the borders of the states. Articles under Part I were invoked when West
Bengal was renamed, and for formation of relatively new states such
as Jharkhand,Chattisgarh or Telengana.
Table of Contents
Parliament may by law admit into the Union, or establish, new States on such terms and
conditions as it thinks fit.
Article 2a : Sikkim to be associated with the Union
{…}
(a) form a new State by separation of territory from any State or by uniting two or more
States or parts of States or by uniting any territory to a part of any State;
(b) increase the area of any State;
(c) diminish the area of any State;
(d) alter the boundaries of any State;
(e) alter the name of any State:
Provided that no Bill for the purpose shall be introduced in either House of Parliament
except on the recommendation of the President and unless, where the proposal
contained in the Bill affects the area, boundaries or name of any of the States, the Bill has
been referred by the President to the Legislature of that State for expressing its views
thereon within such period as may be specified in the reference or within such further
period as the President may allow and the period so specified or allowed has expired.
Explanation I: In this article, in clauses (a) to (e), “State” includes a Union territory, but in
the proviso, “State” does not include a Union territory.
Explanation II: The power conferred on Parliament by clause (a) includes the power to
form a new State or Union territory by uniting a part of any other State or Union territory to
any other State of Union territory.
(1) Any law referred to in article 2 or article 3 shall contain such provisions for the
amendment of the First Schedule and the Fourth Schedule as may be necessary to give
effect to the provisions of the law and may also contain such supplemental, incidental
and consequential provisions (including provisions as to representation in Parliament and
in the Legislature or Legislatures of the State or States affected by such law) as
Parliament may deem necessary.
(2) No such law as aforesaid shall be deemed to be in amendment of this Constitution for
the purposes of article 368.
1. Article under which Sikkim was made part of Indian Union : Article 2a.
2. Article under which Telangana was made part of Indian Union : Article 3.
3. Article 3 original provision was amended by Constitution (fifth amendment) Act,
1955 on 24 December 1955.
4. No where under Part I, it is mentioned that India is a federal state. It rather uses the
phrase “Union of States”.
The territorial waters and the exclusive economic zones shall also become part of
the states or union territories in the absence of any listing of them separately in
Schedule 1 and 4 of the constitution.
This is a very important concept to be understood and read for the IAS exam polity and governance
segments. With the recent Citizenship Amendment Bill in the news, the topic of citizenship assumes all the
more importance.
First, we discuss all the articles in the Indian Constitution pertaining to citizenship.
1.
1. He or either of his parents or any of his grandparents was born in India as given in the
Government of India Act of 1935; and
2. (a) in case such a person has migrated before July 19th, 1948 and has been ordinarily
resident in India since his migration, or
(b) in case such as a person has migrated after July 19th, 1948 and he has been registered as a citizen of
India by an officer appointed in that behalf by the government of the Dominion of India on an application
made by him thereof to such an officer before the commencement of the Constitution, provided that no
person shall be so registered unless he has been resident in India for at least 6 months immediately
preceding the date of his application.
Article 7: Citizenship of certain migrants to Pakistan
This article deals with the rights of people who had migrated to Pakistan after March 1, 1947, but
subsequently returned to India.
Article 9
People voluntarily acquiring citizenship of a foreign country will not be citizens of India.
Article 10
Any person who is considered a citizen of India under any of the provisions of this Part shall continue to be
citizens and will also be subject to any law made by the Parliament.
People who were domiciled in India as on 26th November 1949 automatically became citizens of
India by virtue of citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution.
Persons who were born in India on or after 26th January 1950 but before 1st July 1987 are Indian
citizens.
A person born after 1st July 1987 is an Indian citizen if either of the parents was a citizen of India at
the time of birth.
Persons born after 3rd December 2004 are Indian citizens if both parents are Indian citizens or if one
parent is an Indian citizen and the other is not an illegal migrant at the time of birth.
Citizenship by birth is not applicable for children of foreign diplomatic personnel and those of enemy
aliens.
1. Renunciation: If any citizen of India who is also a national of another country renounces his Indian
citizenship through a declaration in the prescribed manner, he ceases to be an Indian citizen. When
a male person ceases to be a citizen of India, every minor child of his also ceases to be a citizen of
India. However, such a child may within one year after attaining full age become an Indian citizen by
making a declaration of his intention to resume Indian citizenship.
2. Termination: Indian citizenship can be terminated if a citizen knowingly or voluntarily adopts the
citizenship of any foreign country.
3. Deprivation: The government of India can deprive a person of his citizenship in some cases. But
this is not applicable for all citizens. It is applicable only in the case of citizens who have acquired the
citizenship by registration, naturalization, or only by Article 5 Clause (c) (which is citizenship at
commencement for a domicile in India and who has ordinarily been a resident of India for not less
than 5 years immediately preceding the commencement of the Constitution).
1. Is a person of Indian origin and is a citizen of any country except Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal,
Bangladesh, Bhutan, China or Afghanistan, or
2. Has held an Indian passport at any other time or is the spouse of a citizen of India or a person of
Indian origin.
PIO cardholders can enter India with the multiple entry feature for fifteen years. They do not need a separate
visa.
Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) Card
OCI Card is for foreign nationals who were eligible for Indian citizenship on 26th January 1950 or
was an Indian citizen on or after that date.
Citizens of Pakistan and Bangladesh are not eligible for OCI Card. An OCI cardholder does not have
voting rights.
OCI is not dual citizenship. OCI cardholders are not Indian citizens.
The OCI Card is a multipurpose, multiple entry lifelong visa for visiting India.
Persons with OCI Cards have equal rights as NRIs in terms of financial, educational, and economic
matters. But they cannot acquire agricultural land in India.
Relevant Links
UPSC Mains General Studies Paper-II Strategy, Topic-Wise General Studies Paper – 2 Questions
Syllabus & Structure for UPSC Mains
Previous Years Constitution Questions in UPSC Mains Previous Years Polity Questions in UPSC Mains
General Studies Paper – 2 General Studies Paper – 2
Fundamental rights are a very important topic in the polity section of the UPSC exam. It is a basic static
portion of the syllabus but it is highly dynamic in the sense that it is featured in the daily news in some
form or the other. Hence, it is highly important for the IAS exam. In this article, you can read all about
this topic from the IAS exam perspective and download the fundamental rights UPSC notes from the
link above.
In October 2023, a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court unanimously declined to
recognise same-sex marriages. The Bench also declined to permit 'civil unions' for same-sex couples.
All the judges of the Bench, although in favour of civil unions, ruled that there is no fundamental
right to marry under the Indian Constitution.
In this article, you can read all about the 6 fundamental rights of India:
1. Right to Equality
2. Right to Freedom
3. Right against Exploitation
4. Right to Freedom of Religion
5. Cultural and Educational Rights
6. Right to Constitutional Remedies
The significance and list of fundamental rights of India for the UPSC exam are also given in the article.
Fundamental rights are the basic human rights enshrined in the Constitution of India which are
guaranteed to all citizens. They are applied without discrimination on the basis of race, religion, gender,
etc. Significantly, fundamental rights are enforceable by the courts, subject to certain conditions.
There are six fundamental rights in the Indian Constitution. They are mentioned below along with the
constitutional articles related to them:
There was one more fundamental right in the Indian Constitution, i.e., the right to property.
However, this right was removed from the list of fundamental rights by the 44th Constitutional
Amendment.
This was because this right proved to be a hindrance towards attaining the goal of socialism and
redistributing wealth (property) equitably among the people.
Note: The right to property is now a legal right and not a fundamental right.
In this section, we list the fundamental rights of India and briefly describe each of them.
The right to equality is one of the important fundamental rights of the Indian Constitution that
guarantees equal rights for everyone, irrespective of religion, gender, caste, race or place of birth. It
ensures equal employment opportunities in the government and insures against discrimination by the
State in matters of employment on the basis of caste, religion, etc. This right also includes the abolition
of titles as well as untouchability.
Aspirants can read more about the Right to Equality in the linked article.
Freedom is one of the most important ideals cherished by any democratic society. The Indian
Constitution guarantees freedom to citizens. The freedom right includes many rights such as:
• Freedom of speech
• Freedom of expression
• Freedom of assembly without arms
• Freedom of association
• Freedom to practise any profession
• Freedom to reside in any part of the country
Some of these rights are subject to certain conditions of state security, public morality and decency and
friendly relations with foreign countries. This means that the State has the right to impose reasonable
restrictions on them.
Aspirants can find the details on Right to Life (Article 21), in the linked article.
This right implies the prohibition of traffic in human beings, begar, and other forms of forced labour. It
also implies the prohibition of employment of children in factories, etc. The Constitution prohibits the
employment of children under 14 years in hazardous conditions.
This indicates the secular nature of Indian polity. There is equal respect given to all religions. There is
freedom of conscience, profession, practice and propagation of religion. The State has no official
religion. Every person has the right to freely practice his or her faith, and establish and maintain
religious and charitable institutions.
The Constitution guarantees remedies if citizens’ fundamental rights are violated. The government
cannot infringe upon or curb anyone’s rights. When these rights are violated, the aggrieved party can
approach the courts. Citizens can even go directly to the Supreme Court which can issue writs for
enforcing fundamental rights.
Read more on the Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32) in the linked article.
All civil services exam aspirants must go through the features of the Fundamental Rights discussed
further below in this article.
• Fundamental rights are different from ordinary legal rights in the manner in which they are
enforced. If a legal right is violated, the aggrieved person cannot directly approach the SC
bypassing the lower courts. He or she should first approach the lower courts.
• Some of the fundamental rights are available to all citizens while the rest are for all persons
(citizens and foreigners).
• Fundamental rights are not absolute rights. They have reasonable restrictions, which means they
are subject to the conditions of state security, public morality and decency and friendly relations
with foreign countries.
• They are justiciable, implying they are enforceable by courts. People can approach the SC
directly in case of violation of fundamental rights.
• Fundamental rights can be amended by the Parliament by a constitutional amendment but only if
the amendment does not alter the basic structure of the Constitution.
• The Fundamental Rights of the Indian Constitution can be suspended during a national
emergency. But, the rights guaranteed under Articles 20 and 21 cannot be suspended.
• The application of fundamental rights can be restricted in an area that has been placed under
martial law or military rule.
• Conjugal Rights
• Right to be Forgotten
Fundamental Rights Available Only to Citizens
The following is the list of fundamental rights in the Indian constitution that are available only to
citizens (and not to foreigners):
1. Prohibition of discrimination on grounds of race, religion, caste, gender or place of birth (Article
15).
2. Equality of opportunity in matters of public employment (Article 16).
3. Protection of freedom of: (Article 19)
o Speech and expression
o Association
o Assembly
o Movement
o Residence
o Profession
4. Protection of the culture, language and script of minorities (Article 29).
5. Right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions (Article 30).
Fundamental rights are very important because they are like the backbone of the country. They are
essential for safeguarding the people’s interests.
According to Article 13, all laws that are violative of fundamental rights shall be void. Here, there is an
express provision for judicial review. The SC and the High Courts can declare any law unconstitutional
on the grounds that it is violative of fundamental rights. Article 13 talks about not just laws, but also
ordinances, orders, regulations, notifications, etc.
• Any changes to fundamental rights require a constitutional amendment that should be passed by
both the Houses of Parliament. The amendment bill should be passed by a special majority of
Parliament.
o Read about the types of majorities in the Indian Parliament in the linked article.
• As per the Constitution, Article 13(2) states that no laws can be made that take away
fundamental rights.
• The question is whether a constitutional amendment act can be termed law or not.
• In the Sajjan Singh case of 1965, the Supreme Court held that the Parliament can amend any part
of the Constitution including fundamental rights.
• But in 1967, the SC reversed its stance taken earlier when in the verdict of the Golaknath case, it
said that the fundamental rights cannot be amended.
• In 1973, a landmark judgement ensued in the Kesavananda Bharati case, where the SC held
that although no part of the Constitution, including Fundamental Rights, was beyond the
Parliament’s amending power, the “basic structure of the Constitution could not be abrogated
even by a constitutional amendment.”
• This is the basis in Indian law in which the judiciary can strike down any amendment passed by
Parliament that is in conflict with the basic structure of the Constitution.
• In 1981, the Supreme Court reiterated the Basic Structure doctrine.
• It also drew a line of demarcation as April 24th, 1973 i.e., the date of the Kesavananda Bharati
judgement, and held that it should not be applied retrospectively to reopen the validity of any
amendment to the Constitution which took place prior to that date.
Aspirants can learn more about 25 important SC judgements for UPSC in the linked article.
Doctrine of Severability
This is a doctrine that protects the fundamental rights enshrined in the Constitution.
Doctrine of Eclipse
• This doctrine states that any law that violates fundamental rights is not null or void ab initio, but
is only non-enforceable, i.e., it is not dead but inactive.
• This implies that whenever a fundamental right (which was violated by the law) is struck down,
the law becomes active again (is revived).
• Another point to note is that the doctrine of eclipse applies only to pre-constitutional laws (laws
that were enacted before the Constitution came into force) and not to post-constitutional laws.
• This means that any post-constitutional law which is violative of a fundamental right is void ab
initio.
Aspirants can also get details about the IAS Topper and take inspiration from their preparation strategy
and excel in the upcoming UPSC CSE.
Fundamental Rights and Duties Difference
Fundamental Rights are the rights available to the people of this country, while Fundamental Duties are
the obligations on the part of the citizens. Fundamental Duties were added to the Indian Constitution by
the 42nd Constitution Amendment Act 1976 by the Indira Gandhi Government.
Fundamental rights and duties are two important concepts of the Indian Constitution. While fundamental
rights are the entitlements that individuals possess by virtue of being citizens of a particular country,
fundamental duties are the responsibilities that citizens have towards their country and fellow citizens.
Here are some key differences between the two:
1. Nature: Fundamental rights are legal rights that are enshrined in the constitution of a country.
These rights are meant to protect the interests of individuals and provide them with a sense of
security and equality. On the other hand, fundamental duties are moral and ethical obligations
expected of citizens towards their country and fellow citizens.
2. Enforcement: Fundamental rights are enforceable through the courts of law. If an individual's
fundamental rights are violated, they can seek legal recourse and the courts can provide
appropriate remedies. However, fundamental duties are not enforceable in the same way. While
citizens are expected to fulfil their fundamental duties, there are no legal sanctions if they fail to
do so.
3. Goal: The focus of fundamental rights is on protecting the interests of individuals and ensuring
their well-being. Fundamental duties, on the other hand, are focused on promoting the collective
good and ensuring that citizens contribute to the welfare of their country.
Conclusion
Knowing how many fundamental rights are there in the Indian Constitution is a must for an IAS
aspirant. The list of fundamental rights given above will be helpful for the candidates in their UPSC
preparation. Also, aspirants should know the difference between human rights and fundamental rights.
The basic difference between human rights and fundamental rights is the scope of acceptance. While
fundamental rights have scope within a country, human rights are accepted worldwide.
Fundamental Rights is a GS 2 topic. To practise UPSC Mains GS 2 Answer Writing, check the linked
article now!
This constitutes an integral part of the UPSC Syllabus for the Polity section and candidates must
carefully analyse the same as questions based on the same can be asked in the prelims as well as the
mains examination.
UPSC Questions Related to Fundamental Rights
Table of Contents ☰
The Constitution of India enshrines Fundamental Rights for its citizens in Part III of the Constitution.
These rights, referred to as the "Magna Carta of India," are categorised into six groups - Right to Equality,
Right to Freedom, Right against Exploitation, Right to Freedom of Religion, Right to Cultural and
Educational Rights, and Constitutional Remedies. Inspired by the Bill of Rights of the American
Constitution, these legally enforceable rights safeguard individual liberties and provide freedoms against
the state's authoritarian rule, serving as the foundation for India's democratic system. Indian judiciary
protects these Fundamental Rights if there is a violation of these rights by executive as well as legislative
actions. Moreover, the Fundamental rights are referred to as the “Conscience of the
Constitution”.
Enquire Now
Features of Fundamental Rights
Fundamental rights are the minimum basic requirements constitutionally guaranteed by the state. Some
of the features of fundamental rights as enshrined in the Indian Constitution are as follows:
Inspiration:
◦ The American Bill of Rights and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the
Citizen heavily influenced the incorporation of Fundamental Rights in the Indian Constitution.
◦ The ideas of European political thinkers like John Locke, Rousseau, and Montesquieu, who
advocated for individual liberties and natural rights, also inspired the Fundamental Rights.
◦ Justiciable and enforceable: Citizens can move the Supreme Court and other courts for the
enforcement of Fundamental Rights. There are two different mechanisms for the enforcement
of Fundamental Rights:
◦ Judicial Review: The court's power to review public sector bodies' actions in terms of legal
and constitutional appropriateness.
◦ Article 13 explicitly provides for the doctrine of judicial review by stating that all laws
that are inconsistent with or in derogation of any of the fundamental rights shall be
void
◦ Writs: Orders issued by higher courts to lower courts or a public authority commanding the
performance of a particular act. Both these remedies operate through Article 32.
Applicability: Some of the Fundamental Rights are available only to the citizens (Articles 15, 16, 19,
29 and 30), while others are available to all persons, whether citizens, foreigners or legal persons like
corporations or companies.
Meaning of the state: Article 12 of Part III of the Indian Constitution defines the term "state" for the
Constitution.
◦ It includes the Government and Parliament of India, State governments, local authorities, and
other authorities, such as statutory and non-statutory bodies.
Prohibition of discrimination on certain grounds (Article 15): The state cannot discriminate against
citizens based on their religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. It ensures that no citizen shall be
subjected to any disability, liability, or restriction on these grounds.
◦ Every Indian citizen has equal access to shops, restaurants, public entertainment venues, and
the use of wells, tanks, and roads.
◦ However, the state can make special provisions (affirmative actions) or concessions for women
and children.
Equality of opportunity in public employment (Article 16): This article guarantees equal opportunity
for all citizens in public employment.
◦ It prohibits discrimination against a citizen in respect of employment or office under the state
based on religion, race, caste, descent, place of birth, residence, or any combination of these
factors.
◦ However, the state can make provisions for the reservation of appointments or posts in favour of
vulnerable sections of society.
Abolition of untouchability (Article 17): This article abolishes untouchability in any form.
◦ It recognises untouchability as a social evil and ensures the eradication of this discriminatory
practice in Indian society.
Abolition of titles (Article 18): This article states that no title other than military and academic
distinction shall be conferred by the state.
◦ Peaceful assembly
◦ Forming Associations/Unions
Enquire
Protection in Respect of Conviction for Offences (Article 20): This article providesNow
four key
safeguards to individuals:
◦ Ex Post Facto Law: No person can be convicted for an act that was not considered an offence at
the time it was committed.
◦ Limit on Penalty: No person can be subjected to a penalty greater than what was prescribed by
the law at the time the offence was committed.
◦ Double Jeopardy: A person cannot be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than
once.
Protection of life and personal liberty (Article 21): It says that no one can be deprived of his or her
life or personal liberty except according to the procedure established by law.
◦ This right includes various other rights such as the right to privacy,the Right to a clean
environment etc.
Right to Education (Article 21A): It was added through the 86th Amendment to the Constitution in
2002. It entrusts the state to provide free and compulsory education to children aged six to fourteen
in the manner determined by the state.
Protection Against Arrest and Detention in Certain Cases (Article 22): This article provides two key
protections:
◦ Protection at the time of arrest: The arrested person (but not enemy aliens or persons detained
under preventive detention laws) should be informed of the grounds for arrest, allowed to
consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of their choice, and presented before a
magistrate within 24 hours.
Prohibition of employment of children in factories, etc. (Article 24): According to this Article no child
under the age of fourteen shall be employed in a factory, mine, or hazardous occupation.
◦ Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Amendment Act, 2016 completely prohibits on
employment or work of children below 14 years of age in all occupations and processes.
Freedom to manage religious affairs (Article 26): Every religious group or section thereof shall have
the right:
◦ to establish and maintain institutions for religious and charitable purposes;
Freedom from taxation for the promotion of religion (Article 27): No one shall be compelled to pay
any tax, the proceeds of which are specifically used to pay expenses incurred in the promotion or
maintenance of any particular religion or religious sect.
Freedom from attending religious instruction (Article 28): It forbids religious instruction in any
educational institution entirely supported by state funds unless such an institution, even if
administered by the state, is established under an endowment or trust that requires it to be imparted.
◦ No citizen shall be denied admission to or receive aid from a state-run educational institution
based on religion, race, caste, language, or any of them. (protects the rights of individuals
irrespective of community)
Right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions (Article 30): All religious and
linguistic minorities have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their
choice. Protection under it extends only to linguistic and religious and not any section of the
citizens.
Enquire Now
‹ ›
One can directly approach the Supreme Court under Article 32 (original jurisdiction of the Supreme
Court), which empowers the courts to enforce Fundamental Rights through various writs such
as habeas corpus, mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto, and certiorari.
The High Courts also have been conferred these powers under Article 226. Further, any other court
may be authorised by Parliament to issue directives, orders, and writs of every description.
Article 31: It was provided in the original Constitution as a Fundamental Right. The 44th Amendment
Act of 1978 repealed it and made it a constitutional right under Article 300A.
Article 31A: It was introduced by the First Amendment Act, of 1951, to protect five categories of laws
(related to land reforms) from being challenged on the grounds of violating Article 14 and Article 19.
◦ These laws relate to the state’s power to acquire estates, manage properties, amalgamate
corporations, and modify the rights of directors, shareholders, and mining leases.
Article 31B: The First Amendment Act also inserted Article 31B which created the Ninth Schedule to
safeguard the acts and regulations from being challenged on the grounds of violating any
fundamental rights.
◦ Its scope is wider than Article 31A as it immunises any law in the Ninth Schedule from the
Fundamental Rights.
Article 31C: Inserted by the 25th Amendment Act, 1971, it states that no law implementing socialistic
directive principles specified in Articles 39 (b) and (c) shall be declared void on the grounds of
violating Article 14 or Article 19.
I.R. Coelho case (2007): In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that laws under the Ninth Schedule but
made after April 24, 1973 (Kesavananda Bharati case) could be scrutinised if they violated
Fundamental Rights or the basic structure of the Constitution.
Article 34: It allows for exceptions to fundamental rights during the imposition of martial law,
enabling Parliament to pass laws to indemnify individuals and validate actions taken in the context of
maintaining or restoring order in areas where martial law is enforced.
Article 35: This provision states that Parliament has the power to make laws regarding certain
matters specified in Article 16 (3), Article 32 (3), Article 33, and Article 34.
Fundamental: The term"Fundamental" signifies that these rights are essential for the all-round
development of the citizens in a country.
These rights are so important that the Constitution has separately listed them and made special
provisions for their protection.
The Constitution itself ensures that they are not violated by the government.
Rule of Law: Fundamental rights establish the Rule of Law. All citizens are equal under the law. They
have equal rights to freedom of religion, assembly, association, and movement. No person can be
deprived of his life, liberty, or property, except under the law.
◦ The concept of the rule of law came mainly from England (Albert Wayne Dicey) and is an integral
part of the Indian Constitution.
◦ The rule of law delivers four universal principles - accountability, just law, open government, and
accessible and impartial justice.
Different from ordinary legal rights: Fundamental Rights are different from ordinary legal rights.
◦ While ordinary rights are enforced by ordinary law, Fundamental Rights are protected and
guaranteed by the Constitution, the fundamental law of a country.
◦ Ordinary rights may be changed by the legislature through the ordinary process of law-making
whereas; a fundamental right can only be changed by amending the Constitution itself.
Negative Rights: These are the rights that require the state to refrain from interfering
Enquire in the
Nowlives of
citizens, such as the right to equality, the right to freedom of speech, freedom of religion, etc.
Positive Rights: These rights require the state to take positive action to fulfil them, such as the right
to education, the right to equal opportunities, special privileges to weaker sections, etc.
◦ Thus, Fundamental Rights also pave the way for affirmative actions to promote social justice
and equality.
Protection of minority rights: Fundamental Rights ensure that minority communities are not subject
to discrimination, prejudice, or persecution and guarantee their right to practice and preserve their
language, culture, and religion.
Exclusion of social and economic rights: Fundamental Rights in India overlook crucial socio-
economic rights such as the right to social security, work, employment, leisure, etc.
◦ Unlike countries like South Africa, Mexico, and Germany, India has not incorporated these rights
into its constitution.
Suspension during a national emergency: Fundamental Rights can be suspended (except for Articles
20 and 21) during a National Emergency, which undermines the country's democratic system by
putting the rights of citizens in jeopardy.
Neither sacrosanct nor Permanent: The Parliament can limit or extend Fundamental Rights through a
constitutional amendment act under Article 368 and this can be accomplished without affecting the
"Basic Structure of the Constitution."
Not Absolute: Parliament can impose reasonable restrictions on Fundamental Rights provided under
Article 19, which forms the bedrock of democracy.
◦ Article 19(2) allows for restrictions in the interests of the security and sovereignty of India,
friendly relations with Foreign States, public order, decency or morality, contempt of court,
defamation or incitement to an offence.
Preventive detention: The Constitution allows for the preventive detention of individuals under Article
22 without charge or trial. This is a contentious provision because it has the potential to limit
individuals' life and liberty as provided in Article 20.
Lack of Clarity: Certain terms and phrases used to define the various fundamental rights lack clarity
as their explanation is not given in the constitution of India. This creates some confusion or
vagueness in understanding the scope of these rights.
◦ Words such as, 'Public order', 'minorities', 'reasonable restrictions', etc. belong to this category,
which have not been defined properly in the Constitution.
Enquire Now
Articles 36-51 under Part-IV of the Indian Constitution deal with Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP).
They are borrowed from the Constitution of Ireland, which had copied it from the Spanish Constitution. This
article will solely discuss the Directive Principles of State Policy, its importance in the Indian Constitution and the
history of its conflict with Fundamental Rights. This topic is important for UPSC Mains GS-II and also for
political science optional papers and aspirants can also download the DPSP notes.
DPSP are ideals which are meant to be kept in mind by the state when it formulates policies and enacts laws.
There are various definitions to Directive Principles of State which are given below:
● They are an ‘instrument of instructions’ which are enumerated in the Government of India Act, 1935.
● They seek to establish economic and social democracy in the country.
● DPSPs are ideals which are not legally enforceable by the courts for their violation.
● Socialistic Principles,
● Gandhian Principles and,
● Liberal-Intellectual Principles.
Definition: They are the principles that aim at providing social and economic justice and set
the path towards the welfare state. Under various articles, they direct the state to:
Article Promote the welfare of the people by securing a social order through
38 justice—social, economic and political—and to minimise inequalities in income,
status, facilities and opportunities
Article Promote equal justice and free legal aid to the poor
39A
Article In cases of unemployment, old age, sickness and disablement, secure citizens:
41
● Right to work
● Right to education
● Right to public assistance
Article Make provision for just and humane conditions of work and maternity relief
42
Article Secure a living wage, a decent standard of living and social and cultural
43 opportunities for all workers
Article Take steps to secure the participation of workers in the management of industries
43A
Article Raise the level of nutrition and the standard of living of people and to improve
47 public health
Definition: These principles are based on Gandhian ideology used to represent the
programme of reconstruction enunciated by Gandhi during the national movement. Under
various articles, they direct the state to:
Article 40 Organise village panchayats and endow them with necessary powers and
authority to enable them to function as units of self-government
Article 46 Promote the educational and economic interests of SCs, STs, and other weaker
sections of the society and to protect them from social injustice and exploitation
Article 47 Prohibit the consumption of intoxicating drinks and drugs which are injurious to
health
Article 48 Prohibit the slaughter of cows, calves and other milch and draught cattle and to
improve their breeds
Definition: These principles reflect the ideology of liberalism. Under various articles, they
direct the state to:
Article Secure for all citizens a uniform civil code throughout the country
44
Article Provide early childhood care and education for all children until they complete the
45 age of six years. (Note: 86th Amendment Act of 2002 changed the subject matter
of this article and made elementary education a fundamental right under Article
21 A.)
Article Organise agriculture and animal husbandry on modern and scientific lines
48
Article Protect monuments, places and objects of artistic or historic interest which are
49 declared to be of national importance
Article Separate the judiciary from the executive in the public services of the State
50
Article ● Promote international peace and security and maintain just and honourable
51 relations between nations
● Foster respect for international law and treaty obligations
● Encourage settlement of international disputes by arbitration
What are the new DPSPs added by the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976?
42nd Amendment Act , 1976 added four new Directive Principles in the list:
2 Article To promote equal justice and to provide free legal aid to the poor
39A
4 Article To protect and improve the environment and to safeguard forests and
48A wildlife
1. A new DPSP under Article 38 was added by the 44th Amendment Act of 1978, which requires the State
to minimise inequalities in income, status, facilities and opportunities.
2. The 86th Amendment Act of 2002 changed the subject-matter of Article 45 and made elementary
education a fundamental right under Article 21A. The amended directive requires the State to provide
early childhood care and education for all children until they complete the age of 14 years.
3. A new DPSP under Article 43B was added by the 97th Amendment Act of 2011 relating to co-operative
societies. It requires the state to promote voluntary formation, autonomous functioning, democratic
control and professional management of co-operative societies.
4. The Indian Constitution under Article 37 makes it clear that ‘DPSPs are fundamental in the governance
of the country and it shall be the duty of the state to apply these principles in making laws.’
The Supreme Court ruled that in any case of conflict between Fundamental Rights and DPSPs, the provisions of
the former would prevail. DPSPs were regarded to run as a subsidiary to Fundamental Rights. SC also ruled that
Parliament can amend Fundamental Rights through constitutional amendment act to implement DPSPs.
Result: Parliament made the First Amendment Act (1951), the Fourth Amendment Act (1955) and the
Seventeenth Amendment Act (1964) to implement some of the Directives.
The Supreme Court ruled that Parliament cannot amend Fundamental Rights to implement Directive Principles of
State Policy.
Result: Parliament enacted the 24th Amendment Act 1971 & 25th Amendment Act 1971 declaring that it has the
power to abridge or take away any of the Fundamental Rights by enacting Constitutional Amendment Acts. 25th
Amendment Act inserted a new Article 31C containing two provisions:
● No law which seeks to implement the socialistic Directive Principles specified in Article 39 (b)22 and
(c)23 shall be void on the ground of contravention of the Fundamental Rights conferred by Article 14
(equality before law and equal protection of laws), Article 19 (protection of six rights in respect of speech,
assembly, movement, etc) or Article 31 (right to property).
● No law containing a declaration for giving effect to such policy shall be questioned in any court on the
ground that it does not give effect to such a policy.
Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973)
The Supreme Court ruled out the second provision of Article 31C added by the 25th Amendment Act during the
Golaknath Case of 1967. It termed the provision ‘unconstitutional.’ However, it held the first provision of Article
31C constitutional and valid.
Result: Through the 42nd amendment act, Parliament extended the scope of the first provision of Article 31C. It
accorded the position of legal primacy and supremacy to the Directive Principles over the Fundamental Rights
conferred by Articles 14, 19 and 31.
The Supreme Court held the extension of Article 31C made by the 42nd amendment act unconstitutional and
invalid. It made DPSP subordinate to Fundamental Rights. The Supreme Court also held that ‘the Indian
Constitution is founded on the bedrock of the balance between the Fundamental Rights and the Directive
Principles.’
● Fundamental Rights and DPSPs constitute the core of the commitment to social revolution.
● The harmony and balance between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy is an
essential feature of the basic structure of the Constitution.
● The goals set out by the Directive Principles have to be achieved without the abrogation of the means
provided by the Fundamental Rights.
Conclusion: Today, Fundamental Rights enjoy supremacy over the Directive Principles. Yet, Directive Principles
can be implemented. The Parliament can amend the Fundamental Rights for implementing the Directive
Principles, so long as the amendment does not damage or destroy the basic structure of the Constitution.
From which country is it borrowed? Ireland (Which had copied it from Spanish
Constitution)
How many articles are under DPSP? Article 36-51 belong to DPSP
How many types of DPSPs are there? There are three types:
1. Socialist
2. Gandhian
3. Liberal-Intellectual
Have Directive Principles ever amended? Yes, the 42nd Amendment Act, 44th
Amendment Act, and 86th Amendment Act
have added/deleted a few DPSPs.
What are the recent developments in favour There are various such acts enacted to enforce
of DPSPs? DPSP. They are:
1. Through the 42nd amendment act, Parliament extended the scope of the first provision of Article 31C. It
accorded the position of legal primacy and supremacy to the Directive Principles over the Fundamental
Rights conferred by Articles 14, 19 and 31.
2. Fundamental Rights can be amended to implement Directive Principles until it does not harm the basic
structure of the Constitution.
3. Part 3 of the Constitution of India contains the Fundamental Rights guaranteed to the citizens of India.
Articles 12-35 of the Constitution of India deals with Fundamental Rights.
4. Political Democracy is established in India with the help of Fundamental Rights given in the Constitution
of India whereas Economic and Social Democracy is established with the help of Directive Principles of
State Policy.
Answer: B
Frequently Asked Questions about Directive Principles of State Policy
(DPSP)
Directive Principles of State Policy have been grouped into four categories. These are: (1) the economic and
social principles, (2) the Gandhian principles, (3) Principles and Policies relating to international peace and
security and (4) miscellaneous.
The expression “Justice- social, economic, political” is sought to be achieved through DPSPs. DPSPs are
incorporated to attain the ultimate ideals of preamble i.e. Justice, Liberty, Equality and fraternity. Moreover, it also
embodies the idea of the welfare state which India was deprived of under colonial rule
Article 40 of the Constitution which enshrines one of the Directive Principles of State Policy lays down that the
State shall take steps to organise village panchayats and endow them with such powers and authority as may be
necessary to enable them to function as units of self-government.
Directive Principles of State Policy DPSP are mentioned in Part IV of the Indian constitution from Articles 36 to
51 DPSPs are taken from the Constitution of Ireland.
42nd Amendment Act of 1976 added 10 Fundamental Duties to the Indian Constitution. 86th
Amendment Act 2002 later added 11th Fundamental Duty to the list. Swaran Singh Committee in 1976
recommended Fundamental Duties, the necessity of which was felt during the internal emergency of
1975-77.
The Fundamental Duties are dealt with Article 51A under Part-IV A of the Indian Constitution.
This article will mention in detail the 11 Fundamental Duties and their importance in India. The topic
forms a significant part of UPSC Political Science, which is one of the major subjects in Prelims, Mains
GS-II and also optional.
1. Abide by the Indian Constitution and respect its ideals and institutions, the National Flag and the
National Anthem
2. Cherish and follow the noble ideals that inspired the national struggle for freedom
4. Defend the country and render national service when called upon to do so
5. Promote harmony and the spirit of common brotherhood amongst all the people of India
transcending religious, linguistic and regional or sectional diversities and to renounce practices
derogatory to the dignity of women
6. Value and preserve the rich heritage of the country’s composite culture
7. Protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wildlife and to have
compassion for living creatures
8. Develop scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform
9. Safeguard public property and to abjure violence
10. Strive towards excellence in all spheres of individual and collective activity so that the nation
constantly rises to higher levels of endeavour and achievement
11. Provide opportunities for education to his child or ward between the age of six and fourteen
years. This duty was added by the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002
1. They remind Indian Citizens of their duty towards their society, fellow citizens and the nation
3. They inspire citizens & promote a sense of discipline and commitment among them
4. They help the courts in examining and determining the constitutional validity of a law
They have been described by the critics as a code of moral precepts due to their non-justiciable character.
Their inclusion in the Constitution was described by the critics as superfluous. This is because the duties
included in the Constitution as fundamental would be performed by the people even though they were not
incorporated into the Constitution.
Some of the duties are vague, ambiguous and difficult to be understood by the common man.
The list of duties is not exhaustive as it does not cover other important duties like casting vote, paying
taxes, family planning and so on. In fact, the duty to pay taxes was recommended by the Swaran Singh
Committee.
The critics said that the inclusion of fundamental duties as an appendage to Part IV of the Constitution has
reduced their value and significance. They should have been added after Part III so as to keep them on par
with Fundamental Rights.
Swaran Singh’s Committee recommended more than 10 Fundamental Duties, however, not all were
included in the Constitution. Those duties recommended by the committee which were not accepted were:
1. Citizens to be penalized/punished by the parliament for any non-compliance with or refusal to
observe any of the duties.
2. The punishments/penalties decided by the Parliament shall not be called in question in any court
on the ground of infringement of any of Fundamental Rights or on the ground of repugnancy to
any other provision of the Constitution.
3. Duty to pay taxes.
Fundamental Duties are categorized into two – Moral Duty & Civic Duty
1. Moral Duty: cherishing noble ideals of freedom struggle
2. Civic Duty: respecting the Constitution, National Flag and National Anthem
They essentially contain just a codification of tasks integral to the Indian way of life
The Fundamental Duties are confined to Indian citizens only and do not extend to foreigners unlike a few
Fundamental Rights
They are also nonjusticiable similar to Directive Principle of State Policies
There is no legal sanction against their violation
This Fundamental Duty article will be helpful for the aspirants for the upcoming examination.
Download the fundamental duties’ notes PDF from the link given below:
Fundamental Duties are added under which part of the Indian Constitution?
They are added under Part-IV-A of the Constitution.
The Indian Constitution upholds minority rights by ensuring non-discrimination and enabling minorities to preserve and practice their language, culture, and religion. Fundamental Rights, such as equality and freedom of religion, serve as protection against discrimination and prejudice. These provisions underscore the Constitution's commitment to social justice and equality by safeguarding the interests of minority communities .
Positive rights in the Fundamental Rights framework require the state to actively promote and fulfill certain rights, such as the right to education and equal opportunities. Negative rights, on the other hand, mandate the state to refrain from interfering with freedoms such as speech or religion. This bifurcation ensures government actions are aligned towards creating an environment of freedom while also mandating specific interventions for societal well-being .
Fundamental Rights sustain a liberal democracy by establishing the Rule of Law, ensuring all citizens are equal under the law, and providing them with civil and political rights. They act as limitations on both executive tyranny and arbitrary legislation, offering guarantees of individuals' freedoms while promoting political justice and equality. These rights are also seen as cornerstones of democracy as they protect minority rights and are essential for individual development .
The Indian Constitution does not designate a national language because, upon independence, the framers faced the challenge of selecting a language that could unite a nation with over 1,600 languages spoken across its regions. The Constitution thus only lists 22 official languages in the 8th Schedule and avoids giving any one language preeminence to respect linguistic diversity and promote national unity .
Fundamental Rights in India are not absolute; they can be limited or suspended under certain conditions, such as during a national emergency, excluding Articles 20 and 21. Parliament can impose reasonable restrictions, as seen with Article 19, and can amend these rights without altering the Constitution's basic structure. This flexibility, alongside provisions like preventive detention, underscores their limitation, balancing individual freedoms with national interests .
Preventive detention, permissible under Article 22, allows authorities to detain individuals without charge or trial, posing significant implications for Fundamental Rights like the right to liberty. While it is intended to prevent potential threats to state security and public order, it remains contentious as it can lead to abuses, undermining the guarantee of personal freedoms and due process, especially during periods such as emergencies .
The Indian Constitution balances Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy by ensuring that Fundamental Rights are justiciable and enforceable by the courts, while Directive Principles aim to provide social and economic justice. This balance was emphasized in the Minerva Mills case (1980), where the Supreme Court declared that the Constitution is founded on the bedrock of balance between these two elements, ensuring that rights do not overshadow the welfare goals .
The Indian Supreme Court's independence is ensured through its role as the highest court of appeal, the guarantor of citizens' fundamental rights, and the guardian of the Constitution. Various provisions are made in the Constitution to maintain its independence, such as safeguarding fundamental rights to protect against tyranny and ensuring the rights are justiciable .
Fundamental Duties in the Indian Constitution, added by the 42nd Amendment on the Swaran Singh Committee's recommendation, serve as obligations that every citizen is expected to perform, complementing Fundamental Rights. Like Directive Principles, Fundamental Duties aim to promote broader societal goals and are non-justiciable. They are part of the Constitution's strategy to enrich and guide citizen conduct towards national interest and democratic functioning .
The Preamble's declaration of India as a republic indicates that India ceased to owe allegiance to the British crown with the enactment of the Constitution on January 26, 1950. It underscores the ultimate sovereignty of the people of India, suggesting that sovereignty vests in their collectivity and India's decisions are made based on free will, independent of external authorities .