0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views8 pages

CHAP5 Notes

The document discusses the thermodynamic properties of water vapor and its equilibrium with other phases, focusing on concepts such as chemical potential, Gibbs phase rule, and the Clapeyron and Clausius-Clapeyron equations. It provides mathematical formulations for various properties of water in different phases and outlines moisture parameters relevant to atmospheric science. Additionally, it includes examples and problems related to the saturation of water vapor and the dependence of latent heat on temperature.

Uploaded by

cazaresvianney15
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views8 pages

CHAP5 Notes

The document discusses the thermodynamic properties of water vapor and its equilibrium with other phases, focusing on concepts such as chemical potential, Gibbs phase rule, and the Clapeyron and Clausius-Clapeyron equations. It provides mathematical formulations for various properties of water in different phases and outlines moisture parameters relevant to atmospheric science. Additionally, it includes examples and problems related to the saturation of water vapor and the dependence of latent heat on temperature.

Uploaded by

cazaresvianney15
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

10/06/08 1

5. The water-air heterogeneous system

Aside: The following is an on-line analytical system that portrays the thermodynamic properties of water
vapor and many other gases.

[Link]

5.1 Preliminaries

a) Review on equilibrium:
thermodynamic equilibrium -- a system is in thermal equilibrium (no temperature
difference)
mechanical equilibrium -- a system in which no pressure difference exists
between it and its environment
chemical equilibrium -- condition in which two phases coexist (water in this
case) without any mass exchange between them
b) For a homogeneous system, 2 intensive properties describe the thermodynamic state
(consider the eq. of state pα = RT); this is not the case for a heterogeneous
system consisting of dry air, water vapor and condensed water.
c) Consider an extensive property Z of the water-air system and define it as
Ztot = Zg(p,T,nd,nv) + Zc(p,T,nc)
The total differential of this property is the following:

 ∂Z g ,tot   ∂Z   ∂Z   ∂Z g ,tot 
dZ g ,tot =   dT +  g ,tot  dp +  g ,tot  dn d +   dnv
 ∂T  p,n  ∂p  T ,n  ∂n d  T , p ,n  ∂nv T , p,n

 ∂Z c ,tot   ∂Z   ∂Z 
dZ c ,tot =   dT +  c ,tot  dp +  g ,tot  dnc
 ∂T  p ,n  ∂p  T ,n  ∂nc  T , p ,n
Example of chemical equilibrium
A closed container initially filled partly with water in a vacuum will be in chemical
equilibrium when p = es (the saturation vapor pressure). At this point, the number of
molecules passing from liquid to vapor equals the number passing from vapor to liquid.

Vapor in equilibrium
(vacuum initially)
pequil → es
water

5.2 Chemical potential

If a single molecule is removed from a material in a certain phase, with the temperature and
pressure remaining constant, the resulting change in the Gibbs free energy is called the chemical
potential of that phase. In other words, the chemical potential can be defined as the Gibbs free energy
per molecule. (Recall, dg = -sdT + αdp for a reversible transformation.)
10/06/08 2

The chemical potential of an ideal gas is defined by

µ = µo + RTlnp, [dµ = RTdlnp = RTdp/p = αdp]

where µo is the chemical potential for p = 1 atm.

For an ideal gas,

∆g = µ2 - µ1 = RTln(p2/p1) [= -wmax]

Example (Taken from Wallace and Hobbs, pp. 101-102): Derive an expression for the
difference in chemical potential between water vapor and liquid water, µv - µl, in terms of the bulk
thermodynamic properties: e (the partial pressure of water vapor) and T.

For a (vapor) pressure change de, we have (from dg = -sdT + αdp), for vapor and liquid, respectively,

dµv = αvde,
dµl = αlde,

where αv is the specific volume of a water vapor molecule and αl is the specific volume of a liquid water
molecule. Then it follows, by combining the equations above, that

d(µv - µl) = (αv - αl)de ≅ αvde (5.1)

since αv >> αl. The equation of state applied to just one water vapor molecule is

eαv = kT, (5.2)

where k, Boltzmann's constant whose value is 1.381 x 10-23 J K-1 molecule-1, is used in place of the gas
constant to represent one molecule. Upon solving (5.2) for αv, we can write (5.1) as

de
d(µv - µl) = kT . (5.3)
e

Since µv = µl at e = es (saturation, which is equilibrium) we can integrate (5.3) as follows:

µ v −µl e
∫ d(µv - µl) = ∫ kTde/e,
0 es

or

e
µv - µl = kT ln  (for one molecule). (5.4)*
 es 
10/06/08 3

This result will be used later in development of the theory of nucleation of water droplets from the vapor
phase. [Nucleation is therefore closely related to thermodynamics.]

5.3 Changes in state

We will now consider various equilibria for water in the atmosphere.

5.3.1 Gibbs phase rule

For a system of C independent species and P phases, the Gibbs phase rule states that the number
of degrees of freedom F (i.e., the number of state properties that may be arbitrarily selected) is

F=C-P+2 (5.5)

If we deal with a single component system (C=1) such as water then we can form the table below:

P (number of phases) F (degrees of freedom)


1 2
2 1
3 0

Thus, for a single existing phase (such as water vapor) we may arbitrarily choose p (e) and T (i.e., the
equation of state). For two phases, the choice of either p or T determines the other, and for three phases
(i.e., the triple point) there is no choice, i.e., this point has specific values for p and T. The phase
diagram for water is depicted in Figs. 5.1 and 5.2. Along the two coexisting phase lines, one degree of
freedom is possible, within each phase two degrees of freedom exists, and with three coexisting phases
(the so-called triple point) there are none. We will now consider the phase lines.
10/06/08 4

Fig. 5.1. Phase transition equilibria for water. Pt is the triple point, and Pc is the critical point, above which no
distinction between the liquid and vapor phases exists. From Iribarne and Godson (1973).

Fig. 5.2. PT phase diagram for water. Stable phase boundaries are shown by solid lines; metastable phase boundaries are
indicated by dashed lines. Note that the ordinate in exponential in pressure, in contrast to the linear p dependence in Fig. 5.1.
From Young (1993), p. 401.

Fig. 5.3 Thermodynamic surface for water. Taken from Iribarne and Godson (1973).
10/06/08 5

5.3.2 Thermodynamic characteristics of water

Key points on a p-T diagram for water (Figs. 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3):

a) triple point: pt = 610.7 Pa = 6.107 mb; Tt = 273.16 K = 0.01 °C;


αit = 1.091 x 10-3 m3 kg-1; αwt=1.000 x 10-3 m3 kg-1; αvt = 206 m3 kg-1

a) critical point: Tc = 647 K; pc = 218.8 atm; αc = 3.07x10-3 m3 kg-1

5.3.3 Equilibrium between solid and liquid - The Clapeyron Eq.

The lines drawn in Figs. 5.1-5.3 are represent the equilibrium condition between two phases of water.
These are important in our study of thermodynamics, and the equilibrium line between the liquid and
vapor phase is particularly valuable. These equilibrium conditions can be expressed analytically, and the
basis for the functions derived in the following is the First Law, from the the Gibbs free energy is
derived.

At equilibrium we have dg=0, so therefore g(solid) = g(liquid).

-sliquiddT + αliquiddp = -ssoliddT + αsoliddp

Define the following:

∆s = ssolid - sliquid
∆α = αsolid - αliquid

Then

∆sdT = ∆αdp.

We solve this as follows, and utilize the definition of entropy change for a phase transition (Ch. 4):

dp/dT = ∆s/∆α = -∆Hfusion/(T∆α) Clapeyron Equation (5.6)

where the latter equality is based on the entropy change associated with a phase change, defined in Chap.
4: ∆s = -∆Hfusion/T.

This expression is the Clapeyron Equation. Since ∆H > 0 (heat is liberated upon freezing) and ∆α > 0
(freezing water expands), the slope dp/dT < 0 as shown in Figs. 5.1 and 5.2.

5.3.4 Liquid/vapor equilibrium - the Clausius-Clapeyron Eq.

In this case ∆α = αliquid - αvapor ≅ -α vapor. Then, from the equation of state, we can write

-αv = -RvT/es (es is used in place of p since we are concerned with equilibrium at saturation)
10/06/08 6

Then

des/dT = -∆Hvap/(T∆α) = ∆Hvapes/(RvT2)

or dlnes/dT = Lvl/(RvT2). (5.7)

Recall that Lvl is not a constant, but varies by ~10% over the temperature interval (0, 100 °C), and by
about 6% over the interval (-30, 30 °C). (See Table 5.1) However, to a first approximation, we can
assume that Lvl is constant and integrate Eq. (5.7):

es
L lv T dT
∫ d ln e s = ∫
e so R v T T2
o

which is solved as

 e  L  1 1
ln s  = vl  − 
 e so  R v  To T 

where To = 273.1 K and eso = 6.11 mb (from lab measurements).

Rewriting this expression and grouping the constants into new constants A and B yields the simple,
approximate expression:

es(T) = Ae-B/T, (5.8)

where A = 2.53 x 108 kPa and B = 5.42 x 103 K.


A more elegant derivation of the Clausius-Clapeyron equation given in Rogers and Yau,
pp 12-16. We will also consider this.

In order to get a more accurate representation of es(T), the temperature dependence can be incorporated
using a linear correction term involving T in an expression for Lvl, and then substitute in Eq (4.10) and
integrated.

A more accurate form is (see HW problem)

log10 es = -2937.4/T - 4.9283log10T + 23.5471 (es in mb and T in K)

Bolton (1980) determined the following empirical relation by fitting a function to tabular values of es(T).
This form is accurate to within 0.1% over the temperature interval (-35 C, +35 C):

 17.67T 
es (T ) = 6.112 exp  (5.9)
 T + 243.5 
10/06/08 7

Table 5.1. Saturation vapor pressures over water and ice, and latent heats of condensation and sublimation.

T (°C) es (Pa) ei (Pa) Llv (103 J kg-1) Liv (103 J kg-1)


-40 19.05 12.85 2603 2839
-35 31.54 22.36
-30 51.06 38.02 2575 2839
-25 80.90 63.30
-20 125.63 103.28 2549 2838
-15 191.44 165.32
-10 286.57 259.92 2525 2837
-5 421.84 401.78
0 611.21 611.15 2501 2834
5 872.47 2489
10 1227.94 2477
15 1705.32 2466
20 2338.54 2453
25 3168.74 2442
30 4245.20 2430
35 5626.45 2418
40 7381.27 2406

5.4 Moisture parameters

Common variables used for measurement of moisture:


a) mixing ratio (rv)
rv= mv/md = εe / [p-e] ≅ εe/p (5.10)
b) specific humidity (qv)
qv = mv/(mv+md) = rv/r = rv / (rd+rv)
= εe / [p-(1-ε)e] (using the equation of state for rv and rd)
≅ εe/p
Thus, qv ≅ rv.
c) vapor pressure (e) (connection to Clausius-Clapeyron Eq.) -- Don’t confuse e with es
d) relative humidity (f)
f = rv / rvs(T,p) ≈ e/es(T) = rvs(Td)/rvs(T) (5.11)
Be careful - f can be expressed in % or in fraction
e) virtual temperature (Tv) (defined previously; not really used to measure water vapor)
Tv ≅ T(1+0.608rv)
f) dewpoint temperature (Td): temperature at which saturation occurs; defined as a process in Chap. 6.

Which of these are absolute and relative?


Which are conserved for a substaturated parcel that is not experiencing mixing with its surroundings?
10/06/08 8

Problems

1. Prove that pure water vapor can reach saturation in the following processes:
a) isothermal compression
b) adiabatic expansion

2. Using the relation

L(T) = L0 – (c-cpv)(T-T0)

for the dependence of the latent heat of vaporization on temperature, integrate Eq. (5.7) for obtaining the
expression for es(T). This result is sometimes call the Magnus equation or Kiefer’s formula. Over the range –30
°C ≤ T ≤ +30 °C, compare es(T) from this equation with the simpler approximation (5.8), with Bolton’s
empirical formula

 17.67T 
es (T ) = 6.112 exp 
 T + 243.5 

where es is in mb and T is in °C. Also compare with data in Table 5.1.

3. A sample of moist air has a temperature of –5 °C, a pressure of 80 kPa, and a relative humidity of 65%. Solve
for the following properties of the sample by calculations, using approximations only when necessary. Confirm
your answers with a skew-T diagram wherever possible.

a) Potential temperature
b) Mixing ratio
c) Dew point
d) Saturation point temperature (temp. of the LCL)
e) Equivalent potential temperature
f) Virtual temperature
g) Density

4. Determine the water vapor pressure and mixing ratio for a dew point temperature of 90 °F and a pressure of 1
atm. (1 atm = 1013 mb). (°F = 9/5 °C + 32)

5. From the equation log10 es = -2937.4/T - 4.9283 log10 T + 23.5518 for the saturation vapor pressure (in mb),
derive the latent heat of vaporization at 10 °C.

Common questions

Powered by AI

The condition \( \mu_v = \mu_l \) at saturation implies chemical equilibrium between the vapor and liquid phases of water. This equality indicates no net mass exchange, i.e., the rate of evaporation equals the rate of condensation. It is representative of a state where the system's Gibbs free energy is minimized for the existing conditions .

The Clapeyron equation describes the slope of the phase boundary between two phases, such as solid and liquid, using \( dp/dT = \Delta s/\Delta \alpha = -\Delta H_{fusion}/(T\Delta \alpha) \), indicating how pressure changes with temperature during phase transitions . The Clausius-Clapeyron equation, \( d\ln e_s/dT = L_{vl}/(R_vT^2) \), approximates the change in saturation vapor pressure of water with temperature, essential in understanding vapor–liquid equilibria . Both equations are crucial for predicting phase behavior and changes for water under different conditions.

The Gibbs phase rule, expressed as \( F = C - P + 2 \), determines the degrees of freedom \( F \) for a system with \( C \) components and \( P \) phases. For water (\( C = 1 \)), this rule implies: (1) for single-phase systems (e.g., vapor), \( F = 2 \); thus, both pressure and temperature can be varied. (2) For two coexisting phases, choosing either pressure or temperature dictates the other. (3) At the triple point, all three phases coexist and neither \( p \) nor \( T \) can be varied .

Changes in the specific latent heat \( L_{vl}(T) \) influence the Clausius-Clapeyron equation by varying the rate at which the saturation vapor pressure changes with temperature, \( d\ln e_s/dT = L_{vl}/(R_vT^2) \). As \( L_{vl} \) decreases by about 10% over (0, 100°C), it affects \( e_s \) calculations; however, using a constant \( L_{vl} \) allows for first approximation and integration, yielding the expression \( \ln e_s(T) = A - B/T \). These variations are accounted for more precisely when incorporating temperature-dependent corrections .

Virtual temperature, \( T_v \approx T(1+0.608r_v) \), corrects the actual air temperature by considering humidity, thus allowing simplification of air density-related calculations. It modifies a parcel's temperature depending on water vapor content while equating its density to dry air, assisting in meteorological and thermodynamic analyses of moist air masses .

The difference in specific volumes, \( \alpha_v - \alpha_l \), is significant because it represents the extent of the volume change associated with phase transitions. Since \( \alpha_v >> \alpha_l \), the term \( (\alpha_v - \alpha_l)de \approx \alpha_v de \) simplifies calculations. This affects the chemical potential difference \( d(\mu_v - \mu_l) \), making it primarily a function of vapor phase changes, reflecting the dominance of vapor expansion over liquid contraction .

Boltzmann's constant \( k \) is used to express the chemical potential at the molecular level, transforming macroscopic parameters to microscopic averages. It replaces the gas constant \( R \) in the equation \( e\alpha_v = kT \), characterizing behavior per molecule rather than per mole. It is vital for detailed molecular interactions and assists in microscale analysis of phase transitions like nucleation from vapor .

The Clapeyron equation, \( dp/dT = \Delta s/\Delta \alpha = -\Delta H_{fusion}/(T\Delta \alpha) \), is pivotal because it characterizes the temperature-pressure relationship at equilibrium between solid and liquid phases. It accounts for entropy and volume changes during phase transitions, offering insights into energy dynamics and expansion/compression phenomena experienced by water as it solidifies/freezes . This understanding aids predictions of phase behavior under different thermal conditions.

The difference in chemical potential between water vapor and liquid water, \( \mu_v - \mu_l \), can be expressed as \( \mu_v - \mu_l = kT \ln(e/e_s) \), where \( e \) is the partial pressure of water vapor and \( e_s \) is the saturation vapor pressure. This equation arises from integrating the expression \( d(\mu_v - \mu_l) = kT \frac{de}{e} \), considering the condition at saturation where \( \mu_v = \mu_l \).

The mixing ratio \( r_v \) is defined as the mass of vapor to the mass of dry air, whereas specific humidity \( q_v \) is the mass of vapor to the total air parcel mass. They approximate each other under the assumption that \( \epsilon e/p \approx \epsilon e/[p - (1-\epsilon)e] \), given \( \epsilon = M_v/M_d \) is small and \( p >> e \). Thus, \( q_v \approx r_v \) when these conditions are met .

You might also like