Chapter THTREE Fixed Income
Chapter THTREE Fixed Income
Another significant risk for many fixed-income securities is the possibility that the issuer
will not make the promised payments. This risk depends on the issuer. It doesn't exist for
government bonds, but for many other issuers the possibility is very real. Finally, unlike
most money market instruments, fixed-income securities are often quite illiquid, again
depending on the issuer and the specific type.
A bond can be characterized based on (1) its intrinsic features, (2) its type, (3) its indenture
provisions, or (4) the features that affect its cash flows and/or its maturity.
Intrinsic Features; The coupon, maturity, principal value, and the type of ownership are
important intrinsic features of a bond. The coupon of a bond indicates the income that the
bond investor will receive over the life (or holding period) of the issue. This is known as
interest income, coupon income, or nominal yield. Sometimes, however, zero-coupon bonds
are issued that make no coupon payments. In this case, investors receive par value at the
maturity date, but receive no interest payments until then: The bond has a coupon rate of
zero. These bonds are issued at prices considerably below par value, and the investor’s
return comes solely from the difference between issue price and the payment of par value
at maturity. We will return to these bonds below.
The term to maturity specifies the date or the number of years before a bond matures (or
expires). There are two different types of maturity. The most common is a term bond,
which has a single maturity date. Alternatively, a serial obligation bond issue has a series
of maturity dates, perhaps 20 or 25. Each maturity, although a subset of the total issue, is
really a small bond issue with generally a different coupon. Municipalities issue most serial
bonds.
The principal, or par value, of an issue represents the original value of the obligation. This
is generally stated in $1,000 increments from $1,000 to $25,000 or more. Principal value is
Types of Issues: In contrast to common stock, companies can have many different bond
issues outstanding at the same time. Bonds can have different types of collateral and be
senior, unsecured, or subordinated (junior) securities. Secured (senior) bonds are backed
by a legal claim on some specified property of the issuer in the case of default. For example,
mortgage bonds are secured by real estate assets; equipment trust certificates, which are
used by railroads and airlines, provide a senior claim on the firm’s equipment. Unsecured
bonds (debentures) are backed only by the promise of the issuer to pay interest and
principal on a timely basis. As such, they are secured by the general credit of the issuer.
Subordinate (junior) debentures possess a claim on income and assets that is
subordinated to other debentures. Income issues are the most junior type because interest
on them is paid only if it is earned. Although income bonds are unusual in the corporate
sector, they are very popular municipal issues, where they are referred to as revenue
bonds. Finally, refunding issues provide funds to prematurely retire another issue.
The type of issue has only a marginal effect on comparative yield because it is the
credibility of the issuer that determines bond quality. A study of corporate bond price
behavior found that whether the issuer pledged collateral did not become important until
the bond issue approached default. The collateral and security characteristics of a bond
influence yield differentials only when these factors affect the bond’s quality ratings.
Indenture Provisions: The indenture is the contract between the issuer and the
bondholder specifying the issuer’s legal requirements. A trustee (usually a bank) acting on
behalf of the bondholders ensures that all the indenture provisions are met, including the
timely payment of interest and principal. All the factors that dictate a bond’s features, its
type, and its maturity are set forth in the indenture.
Features Affecting Bond’s Maturity:- Investors should be aware of the three alternative
call option features that can affect the life (maturity) of a bond. One extreme is a freely
callable provision that allows the issuer to retire the bond at any time with a typical
Another important indenture provision that can affect a bond’s maturity is the sinking
fund, which specifies that a bond must be paid off systematically over its life rather than
only at maturity. There are numerous sinking-fund arrangements, and the bondholder
should recognize this as a feature that can change the stated maturity of a bond. The size of
the sinking fund can be a percentage of a given issue or a percentage of the total debt
outstanding, or it can be a fixed or variable sum stated on a dollar or percentage basis.
Similar to a call feature, sinking fund payments may commence at the end of the first year
or may be deferred for 5 or 10 years from date of the issue. The amount of the issue that
must be repaid before maturity from a sinking fund can range from a nominal sum to 100
percent. Like a call, the sinking-fund feature typically carries a nominal premium but is
generally smaller than the straight call premium (e.g., 1 percent). For example, a bond issue
with a 20-year maturity might have a sinking fund that requires that5 percent of the issue
be retired every year beginning in year 10. By year 20, half of the issue has been retired
and the rest is paid off at maturity. Sinking-fund provisions have a small effect on
comparative yields at the time of issue but have little subsequent impact on price behavior.
A sinking-fund provision is an obligation and must be carried out regardless of market
conditions. Although a sinking fund allows the issuer to call bonds on a random basis, most
bonds are retired for sinking-fund purposes through direct negotiations with institutional
holders. Essentially, the trustee negotiates with an institution to buy back the necessary
amount of bonds at a price slightly above the current market price.
We simplify for now by assuming there is one interest rate that is appropriate for
discounting cash flows of any maturity, but we can relax this assumption easily. In practice,
there may be different discount rates for cash flows accruing in different periods. For the
time being, however, we ignore this refinement.
To value a security, we discount its expected cash flows by the appropriate discount rate.
The cash flows from a bond consist of coupon payments until the maturity date plus the
final payment of par value. Therefore
If we call the maturity date T and call the discount rate r, the bond value can be written as
r= interest rate
The summation sign in Equation directs us to add the present value of each coupon
payment; each coupon is discounted based on the time until it will be paid. The first term
on the right-hand side of Equation is the present value of an annuity. The second term is
the present value of a single amount, the final payment of the bond’s par value.
You may recall from an introductory finance class that the present value of a $1 annuity
that lasts for T periods when the interest rate equals r is
We call this expression the T -period annuity factor for an interest rate of r. Similarly, we
call PV factor, i.e., the present value of a single payment of $1 to be received in T periods.
Therefore, we can write the price of the bond as
Solution:
Coupon= 1000*0.04= 40
Principal = 1000
60
40 1000
∑ (1.04)❑60
+
(1.04)❑60
t =1
It is easy to confirm that the present value of the bond’s 60 semiannual coupon payments
of $40 each is $904.94, and that the $1,000 final payment of par value has a present value
of$95.06, for a total bond value of $1,000. So ABC could purchase the financial asset at its
face value.
In this example, the coupon rate equals the market interest rate, and the bond price equals
par value. If the interest rate were not equal to the bond’s coupon rate, the bond would not
sell at par value. For example, if the interest rate were to rise to 10% (5% per six months),
the bond’s price would fall by 189.29, to 810.71, as follows
At a higher interest rate, the present value of the payments to be received by the
bondholder is lower. Therefore, the bond price will fall as market interest rates rise. This
illustrates a crucial general rule in bond valuation. When interest rates rise, bond prices
must fall because the present value of the bond’s payments is obtained by discounting at a
(a) The maturity of the bond- Holding coupon rates and default risk constant,
increasing the maturity of a straight bond will increase its sensitivity to interest rate
changes. The present value of cash flows changes much more for cash flows further
in the future, as interest rates change, than for cash flows which are nearer in time.
(b) The coupon rate of the bond- Holding maturity and default risk constant,
increasing the coupon rate of a straight bond will decrease its sensitivity to interest
rate changes. Since higher coupons result in more cash flows earlier in the bond's
life, the present value will change less as interest rates change. At the extreme, if the
bond is a 'zero-coupon' bond, the only cash flow is the face value at maturity, and
the present value is likely to vary much more as a function of interest rates.
A bond may be selling at par value when its coupon rate equals the market interest rate. In
these circumstances, the investor receives fair compensation for the time value of money in
the form of the recurring coupon payments. No further capital gain is necessary to provide
fair compensation. When the coupon rate is lower than the market interest rate, the coupon
payments alone will not provide investors as high a return as they could earn elsewhere in
the market. To receive a fair return on such an investment, investors also need to earn
price appreciation on their bonds. The bonds, therefore, would have to sell below par value
to provide a “built-in” capital gain on the investment.
To illustrate build-in capital gains or losses, suppose a bond was issued several years ago
when the interest rate was 7%. The bond’s annual coupon rate was thus set at 7%. (We will
suppose for simplicity that the bond pays its coupon annually.) Now, with three years left
in the bond’s life, the interest rate is 8% per year. The bond’s fair market price is the
present value of the remaining annual coupons plus payment of par value. That present
value is:
In another year, after the next coupon is paid, the bond would sell at
Thereby yielding a capital gain over the year of $7.94, if an investor had purchased the
bond at $974.23, the total return over the year would equal the coupon payment plus
capital gain, or $70 + $7.94 = $77.94. This represents a rate of return of $77.94/$974.23, or
8%, exactly the current rate of return available elsewhere in the market current rate of
4.4Bond Yields
We have noted that the current yield of a bond measures only the cash income provided by
the bond as a percentage of bond prices and ignores any prospective capital gains or losses.
We would like a measure of rate of return that accounts for both current incomes as well as
the price increase or decrease over the bond’s life. The yield to maturity is the standard
measure of the total rate of return. However, it is far from perfect, and we will explore
several variations of this measure. Nominal yield is the coupon rate of a particular issue. A
bond with an 8% coupon has an 8% nominal yield. It therefore provides a convenient way
of describing the coupon characteristics of the bond.
Yield to Maturity
In practice, an investor considering the purchase of a bond is not quoted a promised rate of
return. Instead, the investor must use the bond price, maturity date, and coupon payments
to infer the return offered by the bond over its life. The yield to maturity (YTM) is defined
as the discount rate that makes the present value of a bond’s payments equal to its price.
This rate is often viewed as a measure of the average rate of return that will be earned on a
bond if it is bought now and held until maturity. For example, suppose an 8% coupon, $
1000 par value, 30-year bond is selling at $1,276.76. What average rate of return would be
earned by an investor purchasing the bond at this price? We find the interest rate at which
the present value of the remaining 60 semiannual payments equals the bond price. This is
the rate consistent with the observed price of the bond. Therefore, we solve for r in the
following equation
Or, equivalently,
Yields annualized using simple interest is also called bond equivalent yields. Therefore, the
semiannual yield would be doubled and reported in the newspaper as a bond equivalent
yield of 6%. The effective annual yield of the bond, however, accounts for compound
interest. If one earns 3% interest every six months, then after one year, each dollar
invested grows with interest to $1 * (1.03)2 = 1.0609, and the effective annual interest rate
on the bond is 6.09%.The bond’s yield to maturity is the internal rate of return on an
investment in the bond. The yield to maturity can be interpreted as the compound rate of
return over the life of the bond under the assumption that all bond coupons can be
reinvested at that yield. Yield to maturity therefore is widely accepted as a proxy for
average return.
Yield to maturity differs from the current yield of a bond, which is the bond’s annual
coupon payment divided by the bond price. For example, for the 8%, 30-year bond
currently selling at $1,276.76, the current yield would be $80/$1,276.76 = 0.0627, or
6.27% per year. In contrast, recall that the effective annual yield to maturity is 6.09%. For
this bond, which is selling at a premium over par value ($1,276 rather than $1,000), the
coupon rate (8%) exceeds the current yield (6.27%), which exceeds the yield to maturity
(6.09%).The coupon rate exceeds current yield because the coupon rate divides the coupon
payments by par value($1,000) rather than by the bond price ($1,276).In turn, the current
yield exceeds yield to maturity because the yield to maturity accounts for the built-in
capital loss on the bond; the bond bought today for $1,276 will eventually fall in value to
$1,000 at maturity. This example illustrates a general rule: For premium bonds (bonds
selling above par value), coupon rate is greater than current yield, which in turn is greater
than yield to maturity. For discount bonds (bonds selling below par value), these
relationships are reversed.
Yield to Call
Callable bonds, some corporate bonds are issued with call provisions, allowing the issuer
to repurchase the bond at a specified call price before the maturity date. For example, if a
company issues a bond with a high coupon rate when market interest rates are high, and
Yield to maturity is calculated on the assumption that the bond will be held until maturity.
What if the bond is callable, however, and may be retired prior to the maturity date? How
should we measure average rate of return for bonds subject to a call provision?
At high market interest rates, the risk of call is negligible because the present value of
scheduled payments is less than the call price; therefore, the values of the straight and
callable bonds converge. At lower rates, however, the values of the bonds begin to diverge,
with the difference reflecting the value of the firm’s option to reclaim the callable bond at
the call price. At very low market rates the present value of schedule payments significantly
exceeds the call price, so the bond is called.
This analysis suggests that bond market analysts might be more interested in a bond’s yield
to call rather than its yield to maturity, especially if the bond is likely to be called. The yield
to call is calculated just like the yield to maturity, except that the time until call replaces
time until maturity and the call price replaces the par value. This computation is sometimes
called “yield to first call,” as it assumes the issuer will call the bond as soon as it may do so.
Example: Suppose the $1000 par value, 8% coupon semiannually, 30-year maturity bond
sells for $1,150 and is callable in 10 years at a call price of $1,100. Its yield to maturity and
yield to call would be calculated using the following inputs:
Yield to call is then 6.64%. In contrast, yield to maturity is 6.82%.Notice that redemption
value is 110, i.e., 110% of par value.
We have noted that most callable bonds are issued with an initial period of call protection.
In addition, an implicit form of call protection operates for bonds selling at deep discounts
from their call prices. Even if interest rates fall a bit, deep-discount bonds still will sell
below the call price and thus will not be subject to a call. Premium bonds that might be
selling near their call prices, however, are especially apt to be called if rates fall further. If
interest rates fall, a callable premium bond is likely to provide a lower return than could be
earned on a discount bond whose potential price appreciation is not limited by the
likelihood of a call. Investors in premium bonds often are more interested in the bond’s
yield to call rather than yield to maturity as a consequence, because it may appear to them
that the bond will be retired at the call date.
Horizon Yield
This measures the expected rate of return of a bond that you expect to sell prior to its
maturity. It is therefore a total return measure which, allows the portfolio manager to
project the performance of a bond on the basis of a planned investment horizon, his
expectations concerning reinvestment rates and future market yields. This allows the
portfolio manager to evaluate which of several potential bonds considered for investment
will perform best over the planned investment horizon.
Using total return to assess performance over some investment horizon is called Horizon
Analysis while the return calculated over the horizon is called Horizon Yield or Return.
The disadvantage of this approach for calculating return is that it requires the portfolio
manager to make some assumptions about reinvestment rates, future yields and to think in
terms of a specified period or horizon. It however enables the manager to evaluate the
performance of a bond under different interest rate scenarios thereby assessing the
sensitivity of the bond to interest rate changes.
Suppose you buy a 30-year, 7.5% (annual payment) coupon bond for $980 (when its yield
to maturity is 7.67%) and plan to hold it for 20 years. Your forecast is that the bond’s yield
to maturity will be 8% when it is sold and that the reinvestment rate on the coupons will be
Based on these forecasts, your $980 investment will grow in 20 years to $966.45 +
$2,758.92 = $3,725.37. This corresponds to an annualized compound return of 6.90%:
$980(1+r) 20 = $3,725.37
r= 0.0690 = 6.90%
Credit risk occurs when the issuer default on the payment of the coupon, and even the
principal amount. This may occur if the issuer has problems meeting its obligations as
promised. This is also known as default risk or issuer risk. Credit ratings try to estimate the
relative credit risk of a bond based on the company’s ability to pay. Credit rating agencies
periodically review their bond ratings and may revise them if conditions or expectations
change. The corporate bond contract (called an indenture) often includes terms called
covenants designed to limit credit risk. For instance, the terms may limit the amount of debt
the company can take on, or may require it to maintain certain financial ratios. Violating
the terms of a bond may constitute a default. The bond trustee monitors the company’s
compliance with the terms of its indenture. The trustee acts on behalf of the bondholders
and pursues remedies if the bond covenants are violated.
The value of the bond is affected by interest rate changes. When interest rates rise, bond
prices fall and vice versa. The longer the bond’s maturity, the more time there is for rates to
change and, as a result, affect the price of the bond. Therefore, bonds with longer maturities
generally present greater interest rate risk than bonds of similar credit quality that have
shorter maturities. To compensate investors for this interest rate risk, long-term bonds
generally offer higher interest rates than short-term bonds of the same credit quality. For
example, imagine one bond that has a coupon rate of 2% while another bond has a coupon
rate of 4%. All other features of the two bonds—when they mature, their level of credit
risk, and so on—are the same. If market interest rates rise, then the price of the bond with
the 2% coupon rate will fall by a greater percentage than that of the bond with the 4%
coupon rate. This makes it particularly important for investors to consider interest rate risk
Bond prices and yields are inversely related: As yields increase, bond prices fall; as
yields fall, bond prices rise.
An increase in a bond’s yield to maturity results in a smaller price change than a
decrease in yield of equal magnitude.
Prices of long-term bonds tend to be more sensitive to interest rate changes than
prices of short-term bonds.
The sensitivity of bond prices to changes in yields increases at a decreasing rate as
maturity increases. In other words, interest rate risk is less than proportional to bond
maturity.
Interest rate risk is inversely related to the bond’s coupon rate. Prices of low-coupon
bonds are more sensitive to changes in interest rates than prices of high-coupon bonds.
The sensitivity of a bond’s price to a change in its yield is inversely related to the yield
to maturity at which the bond currently is selling.
Market Risk
The value of the bond is also subject to demand and supply forces. Should the bond market
as a whole decline, the value of individual bonds may be brought down by market
sentiments regardless of their fundamental characteristics. As such, this market risk is
relevant if the investor decides to sell the bond and not hold it to maturity.
Inflation risk
Inflation is a general rise in the prices of goods and services, which causes a decline in
purchasing power. With inflation over time, the amount of money received on the bond’s
interest and principal payments will purchase fewer goods and services than before.
Liquidity Risk
When there is a lack of buyers or sellers in the market, the investor may not be able to
execute the trade or may be forced to trade at a value significantly away from the investor’s
desired price. This is liquidity risk. Liquidity is the ability to sell an asset, such as a bond,
for cash when the owner chooses. Bonds that are traded frequently and at high volumes
may have stronger liquidity than bonds that trade less frequently. Liquidity risk is the risk
that investors seeking to sell their bonds may not receive a price that reflects the true value
of the bonds (based on the bond’s interest rate and credit- worthiness of the company). If
you own a bond that is not traded on an exchange, you may have to go to a broker when
you want to sell it. In addition, the bond market does not have the same pricing
The investor is exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rate when the investor trades in
bonds that are denominated in a foreign currency. Foreign currency exchange rate may
move adversely and may erode the returns on the bond investment.
Counterparty risk
There are counterparty risks for bonds which are traded over-the-counter (OTC).
Counterparty risk is present when the party who goes into a trade or transaction does not
fulfill its obligations. For this reason, OTC transactions may involve increased risks.
Call risk
Some bonds may have a “call provision” which give their issuers the option to redeem the
bonds at a specified price prior to maturity. Declining interest rates may accelerate the
redemption of a callable bond, where the investor’s principal will be returned earlier than
expected. When this happens, the investor may have to reinvest the principal at a lower
interest rate (or coupon rate).Investors are advised to consider all risks by reading the
prospectus /information memorandum / term sheet or obtaining advice from a qualified
financial adviser representative before they make a commitment to purchase any bonds.
A bond rating is a grade given to bonds that indicates their credit quality. Private
independent rating services such as Standard & Poor's, Moody's and Fitch provide these
evaluations of a bond issuer's financial strength, or it’s the ability to pay a bond's principal
and interest in a timely fashion. A credit rating is an assessment of an entity’s ability to pay
its financial obligations. The ability to pay financial obligations is referred to as
“creditworthiness.” Credit ratings apply to debt securities like bonds, notes, and other debt
A credit rating does not reflect other types of risk, such as market or liquidity risks, which
may also affect the value of a security. Nor does a credit rating consider the price at which
an investor purchased a security, or the price at which the security may be sold. You should
not interpret a credit rating as investment advice and should not view it as a
recommendation to buy, sell, or hold securities. A credit rating is not a guarantee that a
financial obligation will be repaid. For example, an ‘AAA’ credit rating on a debt instrument
does not mean the investor will always be paid with absolute certainty—instruments rated
at this level sometimes default.
Bond rating agencies base their quality ratings largely on an analysis of the level and trend
of some of the issuer’s financial ratios. The key ratios used to evaluate safety are:
Coverage ratios. Ratios of company earnings to fixed costs. For example, the times
interest- earned ratio is the ratio of earnings before interest payments and taxes to
interest obligations. The fixed-charge coverage ratio includes lease payments and
sinking fund payments with interest obligations to arrive at the ratio of earnings to
all fixed cash obligations. Low or falling coverage ratios signal possible cash flow
difficulties.
Term: 7 years
The bond has a nominal (or par) value of $1000. The market price is always quoted as
percentage of the nominal value, which means you have to pay $1000 to buy this bond at
issue. Like a straight bond, it pays you coupon semi-annually, so each coupon payment will
be 1000*3.75%/2 =$18.75. In addition, it allows you to exchange the bond for 107.2570
shares any time before maturity, which is 09/15/20. If the bond is not converted, it will be
Many of the convertible bonds are also callable by the issuer on a set of pre-specified dates,
which may lead to “forced conversion”. Consider a callable convertible bond where the
issuer has the option to call the bond at par tomorrow. However, the conversion value of
the bond is $110. In this case, the investor would be forced to convert the bond into shares
worth $110 before the call date. The call feature is an option with the issuer, and it will
decrease the value of the convertible bond.
To make things more complicated, there are “protected” calls or “soft” calls where the bond
can be called only if the share price (or the average share price over the past 20days) is
above a certain barrier.
Some convertible bonds may also have put features that allow the buyer to put back the
bonds to the issuer. This is buyer’s option and it would increase the value of the convertible
bond. If the call and put features occur simultaneously, priority is given according to the
prospectus.
In the early 1990s, Japanese corporations began to issue CBs with “refix Clauses”. In its
simplest form, it changes the conversion ratio subject to the share price level on certain
days between issue and expiry. Suppose on one of these days the share price drops by20%,
then the refix clause may increase the conversion ratio by 20%. This feature makes it
attractive to investor and will increase the value of the convertible bond.
There are complications on conversion proceeds. First, some bonds can be converted into a
combination of shares and cash. In most cases, the conversion number as well as the cash
amount varies as a function of time. Second, when a buyer converts and receives shares,
these shares may either be distributed from existing stock or new shares just issued. In the
latter case, there is a dilution effect the same company issues more shares. Third, shares
receive upon conversion may be denominated into a different currency. For example, the
underlying shares of US dollar convertible bonds may be traded in Japanese yen. Buyers of
this type of convertible bonds are also exposed to currency risk.