2026 World Economic Outlook Update
2026 World Economic Outlook Update
WORLD
ECONOMIC
OUTLOOK
UPDATE
Global Economy:
Steady amid Divergent Forces
2026
JAN
JAN
2026 WORLD ECONOMIC OUTLOOK UPDATE
add a layer of complexity. Policy uncertainty, Figure 1. Removal of Some US Tariffs Offsets Recently
Implemented Ones
although lower than it was in October, is still (US effective tariff rate, percent)
much higher than it was in January 2025. 28
activity in Germany, leaving real GDP Sources: Bloomberg Finance L.P.; and IMF staff calculations.
Note: The Magnificent 7 is an equal-dollar-weighted equity benchmark composed of
unchanged from the second to the third Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Tesla, Nvidia, and Meta. Although it includes
quarters. Japan’s economy contracted by 2.3 several of the most influential leaders in artificial intelligence (AI), it does not cover
all major AI-focused companies. For example, Oracle and Palantir are not part of
percent, with private and government the group.
consumption offsetting some of the contraction driven by private residential investment and
exports. China’s growth decelerated to 2.4 percent (as per staff estimates), with weak domestic
demand, especially in the housing sector, partly offset by resilient exports. Growth in the United
States accelerated to 4.3 percent, with a pickup in technology investment and expenditure
estimated to add about 0.3 percentage point to average annualized GDP growth in the first three
quarters of 2025, offsetting the drag from the federal government shutdown in the last quarter
of the year. There are also signs that technology-related investment contributed to activity in
Spain and the United Kingdom, though not at the same scale as in the United States. The mirror
image of soaring investment in information and Figure 3. Tech-Related Trade Flows Continue to Grow Briskly
(Percent, year over year)
technology sectors showed up as strong
Technology exports to US Technology exports to ROW
performance in exports of semiconductors and Other exports Total exports
other equipment in Asian economies. Even as 15 1. Asia Excluding China
signs of moderation have started to appear in 10
high-frequency data, global trade has remained 5
relatively robust, with brisk expansion in 0
technology-related exports offsetting slowing –5
momentum in exports in other product –10
categories (Figure 3). –15
Jan. Jul. Jan. Jul. Jan. Sep.
Global inflation has been largely steady. While the 2023 23 24 24 25 25
on account of tepid global demand growth and strong supply growth. However, a soft price
floor is provided by higher-cost producers, Chinese strategic stockpiling, and the approach of
OPEC+ (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries plus selected nonmember
countries) to avoid a price collapse. Natural gas prices are expected to remain relatively
contained amid lower energy demand resulting from uncertainty, more flexible European Union
(EU) storage targets, and the prospects of ample liquid natural gas supply in the medium term.
Monetary policy rates in the United Kingdom and the United States are expected to continue to
decline, though at varying speeds, whereas the IMF staff expects the policy rate in the euro area
to remain unchanged and Japan to raise its policy rate gradually. Fiscal policy in advanced
economies, particularly Germany, Japan, and the United States, is expected to be stimulative in
the near term, pivoting from a tariff-driven mildly contractionary stance in the United States
(Figure 4).
Global growth is expected to remain steady, with the momentum in high-tech sectors set to slow
but to continue to partly offset the drag elsewhere. While tariffs and uncertainty are projected to
continue to weigh on the level of activity, the effect on growth is expected to fade during 2026
and 2027. At 3.3 percent for 2026 and 3.2 percent for 2027, the forecasts mark a slight
deceleration from the estimated 3.3 percent achieved in 2025. The forecast for 2026 is revised
upward by 0.2 percentage point compared with that in the October 2025 WEO, while the
forecast for 2027 is unchanged (Table 1; see also Annex Table 1). There are, however, significant
revisions for some countries, with the changes in different directions.
Growth in advanced economies is projected to be 1.8 percent in 2026 and 1.7 percent in 2027. In the
United States, the economy is projected to expand by 2.4 percent in 2026, supported by fiscal
policy and a lower policy rate, while the impact of higher trade barriers also gradually wanes.
This 0.3 percentage point upward revision from the October forecast reflects a stronger-than-
expected GDP outturn in the third quarter of 2025, a rebound in activity in the first quarter of
2026 compared with that in the fourth quarter of 2025 following the end of the federal
government shutdown, and the associated carryover. Growth is projected to remain solid at 2.0
percent in 2027, with a near-term fiscal boost from tax incentives for corporate investment
under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025. Technology-driven momentum is expected to
moderate but still provide some offset to lower immigration and moderating consumption. In
the euro area, growth is expected to remain steady at 1.3 percent in 2026 and at 1.4 percent in
2027. The slightly faster growth in 2027 reflects projected increases in public spending, notably
in Germany, alongside continued strong performance in Ireland and Spain. The forecast is
broadly unchanged from that in October, with the subdued growth rate reflecting unresolved
structural headwinds. The impact of the planned increase in defense spending is expected to
materialize only in subsequent years, given commitments to reach target levels gradually by 2035.
Compared with other regions, the euro area benefits less from the recent technology-driven
investment boost. Lingering effects of the persistent rise in energy prices after Russia’s invasion
of Ukraine will continue to drag on manufacturing, with additional pressure from the real
appreciation of the euro relative to currencies of countries exporting similar products. In Japan,
growth is projected to moderate from 1.1 percent in 2025 to 0.7 percent in 2026 and to 0.6
percent in 2027. This marks a small upward revision relative to the October figure, reflecting in
part the fiscal stimulus package announced by the new government.
In emerging market and developing economies, growth is expected to continue to hover just above 4.0
percent in 2026 and 2027. Relative to the projection in October, growth in 2025 for China is
revised upward by 0.2 percentage point to 5.0 percent. The revision reflects stimulus measures
and additional policy bank lending for investment. Growth for 2026 is also revised upward by
0.3 percentage point to 4.5 percent, reflecting the lower US effective tariff rates on Chinese
goods as a result of the yearlong trade truce agreed to in November and stimulus measures that
are assumed to be implemented over two years. The economy’s growth rate is expected to
decelerate to 4.0 percent in 2027 as structural headwinds assert themselves. In India, growth is
revised upward by 0.7 percentage point to 7.3 percent for 2025, reflecting the better-than-
expected outturn in the third quarter of the year and strong momentum in the fourth quarter.
Growth is projected to moderate to 6.4 percent in 2026 and 2027 as cyclical and temporary
factors wane.
In the Middle East and Central Asia, growth is projected to accelerate from 3.7 percent in 2025 to
3.9 percent in 2026 and to 4.0 percent in 2027, supported by higher oil output, resilient local
demand, and ongoing reforms. Growth is also expected to accelerate in sub-Saharan Africa, from
4.4 percent in 2025 to 4.6 percent in 2026 and 2027, supported by macroeconomic stabilization
and reform efforts in key economies. In Latin America and the Caribbean, growth is projected to
moderate to 2.2 percent in 2026 and bounce to 2.7 percent in 2027 as countries in the region
approach potential from different cyclical positions. In emerging and developing Europe, a sharp
slowdown in 2025 to a growth rate of 2.0 percent is expected to reverse, with economies in the
region expanding at an average rate of 2.3 percent in 2026 and 2.4 percent in 2027. In most
regions, the rebound also reflects the fading effect of shifting trade policies.
World trade volume growth is expected to decline from 4.1 percent in 2025 to 2.6 percent in 2026
and increase to 3.1 percent in 2027. These Figure 5. Inflation Dynamics Diverge
dynamics reflect patterns of front-loading and (2026 inflation forecasts, percent, year over year)
trade flow adjustments to new policies. Over 3.5
the medium term, expansionary fiscal packages
3.0
in economies with current account surpluses
2.5
are expected to contribute to declining global
imbalances. Countering this force is the 2.0
softening demand and lower energy prices remaining intact. Divergence between the United
States and most other countries lingers (Figure 5). With pass-through from higher tariffs
gradually materializing, US core inflation is projected to return to the country’s 2 percent target
during 2027. Australia and Norway are also projected to see some drawn-out persistence in
above-target inflation. In the United Kingdom, inflation, which increased last year partly due to
one-off regulated price changes, is expected to return to target by the end of 2026 as a
weakening labor market continues to exert downward pressure on wage growth. In Japan,
inflation is expected to moderate in 2026 and converge toward the country’s target in 2027, as
food and commodity prices ease. In the euro area, headline inflation is projected to hover
around 2 percent, with core inflation projected to decline to that level in 2027. Inflation in China
is projected to start rising from low levels, whereas inflation in India is expected to go back to
near target levels after a marked decline in 2025 driven by subdued food prices.
Narrow Base of Drivers Makes Growth Vulnerable
Risks to the outlook for the global economy remain tilted to the downside. The resilience
exhibited so far is driven largely by a few sectors and often supported by monetary and fiscal
accommodation. It could be disrupted by either sectoral dynamics or shocks disseminating from
long-standing broader risk factors.
Should expectations about AI-driven productivity gains turn out to be overly optimistic and
outcomes disappoint, a sharp drop in real investment in the high-tech sector as well as in
spending on AI adoption in other sectors and a more prolonged correction in stock market
valuations—which have increasingly been lifted by only a few technology firms—could ensue.
The rapid obsolescence of unused or misaligned assets, costly reallocation of capital and labor
accompanied by a decline in business dynamism, and negative wealth effects would weigh on
private consumption and investment. Spillovers would spread, directly through trade flows, to
export-oriented economies specializing in technology products. These would radiate to the rest
of the world through the tightening of global financial conditions. The impact on growth is
highly uncertain and depends on how financial conditions react. As a reference, under a scenario
presented in the October 2025 WEO which includes a moderate correction in AI stock
valuations as part of a general tightening of financial conditions, global growth declines by 0.4
percent in 2026 relative to baseline.
The fragile balance of trade policy stances underlying the baseline could be disrupted. Additional
sector-specific tariffs, especially if imposed on upstream industries, could create supply
bottlenecks and impose an outsize impact on economic activity and prices. Nontariff measures
targeting critical inputs such as rare earth minerals might also disrupt global supply chains. More
countries could adopt a protectionist posture, especially if trade diversion and rerouting become
disruptive. In such instances, decompression of profit margins could amplify and prolong any
inflationary effects.
A significant escalation in geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East or Ukraine but
possibly also in Asia and Latin America, could trigger substantial negative supply shocks.
Disruption to major shipping routes, critical supply chains, and air travel could occur, leading to
delays and increased costs. If key infrastructure were damaged, resulting supply constraints could
drive commodity prices higher. Spikes in domestic political uncertainty, including but not limited
to those around elections, could further elevate and broaden uncertainty, weighing on sentiment
and holding back consumption and investment. Political interference in independent economic
institutions could raise the risk of policy mistakes and erode public confidence and trust.
Combined with lingering fragilities in financial markets, fiscal vulnerabilities might become more
pronounced, with implications for macrofinancial stability. A particular concern is elevated
public debt levels in several major economies, especially those whose currencies and securities
are systemically important in international financial markets. Fiscal sustainability worries in those
economies could not only put pressure on their own borrowing costs but also tighten broader
financial conditions and amplify financial market volatility. Increased reliance on price-sensitive
investors such as money market funds and leveraged hedge funds heightens dislocation risks and
may necessitate repeated provision of liquidity backstops by central banks, possibly generating
moral hazard and financial dominance concerns. Interactions with geopolitical factors—for
instance, events that would trigger a tightening of measures to combat money laundering and
financing of terrorism—could be an additional amplifier. Foreign aid cuts add to the fiscal
challenges in low-income developing countries. The sovereign-bank nexus could exacerbate the
feedback loop between higher yields on public debt and tighter financial conditions for the
private sector in a broader set of countries.
On the upside, rapid adoption of AI, possibly facilitated by the ongoing surge in AI-related
investment in both hard and soft infrastructure, could significantly improve productivity and
boost medium-term growth prospects sooner rather than later. The fast pace of innovations
might foster creative destruction and revive business dynamism. As a result, global growth may
be lifted by as much as 0.3 percentage points in 2026 and between 0.1 and 0.8 percentage points
per year in the medium term, depending on the speed of adoption and improvements in AI
readiness globally. The benefits could be shared across the economy, provided that
complementary policies to contain the potential impact on energy prices by relaxing power
supply constraints, initiatives to scale up the necessary critical intermediate inputs, and labor
market programs to manage workforce transitions are in place.
More in the near term, tangible progress in trade talks would stand to lower tariffs, enhance
policy predictability, and support global efficiency gains. The gains could be larger if
strengthened cooperation extends to services trade, foreign direct investment, and international
taxation, boosting investment and bolstering public finances.
Current challenges and the possibility of transformative technological changes could open a
window of opportunity for structural reform efforts to gain momentum. Accelerated
implementation of reforms that upskill the existing labor force, reduce barriers to labor mobility,
streamline and rationalize business regulations, enhance competition, and promote innovation
would make it possible to lift the growth potential of economies in a lasting manner while
enhancing their resilience and capacity to adapt.
other economies. Meanwhile, better growth performance and prospects could increase fiscal
room in some cases, such as that of the United States, while possibly reducing it in others
because of the pressure on interest rates. This calls for even more discipline so that any windfalls
are used wisely to put public debt on a decisively downward path where fiscal room opens up
and so that realistic and robust fiscal consolidation is enacted without further delay where fiscal
room shrinks.
Ordinarily, exchange rates should respond flexibly to market signals, thereby facilitating
macroeconomic adjustment. Should significant fluctuations in foreign exchange or risk
premiums arise, the IMF’s Integrated Policy Framework offers guidance for tailored policy
responses. In select cases, alongside appropriate monetary and fiscal policy stances, temporary
foreign exchange interventions or capital flow management tools may be warranted.
With heightened uncertainty and fragilities in asset valuations, strong prudential oversight is
needed to preserve financial stability. In periods of sustained uncertainty such as the current one,
expanded use of scenario analysis can enhance macroeconomic policymaking. Readiness to
deploy contingency plans for diverse risks ensures resilience should those risks materialize.
To stabilize expectations and encourage investment in a broader set of sectors, countries should
make reducing policy-driven uncertainty a priority. They should establish and adhere to
transparent and coherent trade policy frameworks, aided by pragmatic cooperation. This
involves advancing multilateral efforts concerning key global commons, updating international
regulations where feasible, and exploring regional or plurilateral solutions where appropriate.
Bilateral dialogues should not adversely impact third-party nations. Efforts to ease trade frictions
and lower barriers to trade and investment should be aligned with those aiming to address
excessive external imbalances resulting from domestic policy decisions (see the 2025 External
Sector Report). Achieving lasting resolutions requires reaching a common understanding of
underlying distortions and taking action to address them.
Beyond the navigation of near-term trade-offs and challenges, elevating medium-term growth
prospects remains the most effective strategy for resolving macroeconomic dilemmas. Structural
reforms targeting labor markets, education, regulatory frameworks, and competition will drive
productivity, potential output, and job creation. Moreover, harnessing technological progress—
through digital transformation, AI adoption, and investment in renewables and energy-efficient
systems, among other possibilities—can accelerate productivity gains and expand growth
potential. These efforts should not jeopardize but rather be aligned with a rebalancing of the
global economy, which is a crucial element of sustainability. Weaving in growth-enhancing
measures together with efforts to fortify the EU single market, to chart a credible fiscal
consolidation plan to put US public debt on a decisively downward path, and to advance China’s
reforms to strengthen the social protection system and scale back unwarranted industrial policy
support would help diversify the sources of global growth.
22:Q3
23:Q1
23:Q3
24:Q1
24:Q3
25:Q1
25:Q3
2022:Q1
Oct. 10
Oct. 20
Oct. 30
Nov. 9
Nov. 17
sizable share of stock market capitalization and drive much of
corporate capital expenditure growth. Market participants are
Sources: Bloomberg Finance L.P.; and IMF staff calculations.
increasingly focused on whether these firms can deliver sustained Note: The IMF Financial Conditions Index (FCI) is designed
to capture the pricing of risk. It incorporates various pricing
AI revenue acceleration to justify lofty valuations. Rising reliance indicators, including real house prices. Balance sheet or
credit growth metrics are not included. A lower (higher) FCI
on debt financing, reflected in high debt ratios and widening score implies easier (tighter) financial conditions. The shaded
area shows daily FCIs estimated using available high-
credit default spreads of some firms, raises additional concerns. frequency market data. AEs = advanced economies; EMs =
emerging markets; GFSR = Global Financial Stability Report.
In addition, circular investment and procurement arrangements,
in which firms invest in each other while securing future orders, among large AI players create opacity
and concentration risk. These practices make ownership structures and valuations harder to assess.
Heavy issuance and evolving investor appetite are pushing sovereign debt toward shorter
maturities, reshaping market dynamics in major economies. Global sovereign debt is projected to
exceed 100 percent of GDP by the decade’s end. Lower policy rates have helped steady longer-term
yields, even as term premiums rise amid heavy issuance and shifting investor appetite away from long-
duration assets. Dutch pension funds are shortening portfolio durations, and traditional UK buyers,
such as pension funds, are ceding ground to hedge funds. In both the UK and the US, issuance now tilts
toward shorter maturities. Meanwhile, short-term rates have been rising, with bouts of volatility,
prompting periodic use of central bank liquidity and raising concerns about market functioning.
Recent corporate defaults call attention to underwriting standards and transparency in credit
markets. Investors viewed the failures of Tricolor Holdings and First Brands as isolated, and other
struggling firms have so far avoided defaults through restructurings with lenders, often at the cost of
rating downgrades. Nevertheless, the defaults of these two companies have exposed several important
weaknesses: opaque financing structures, weak governance, and lax underwriting standards. These issues
have become more common with the rapid growth of nonbank lenders, especially private credit.
Vulnerabilities in this sector could become more pronounced if market conditions tighten or investor
risk appetite wanes.