Optical Alignment with Point Source Microscope
Optical Alignment with Point Source Microscope
[Link]/conference-proceedings-of-spie
Robert E. Parks
William P. Kuhn
ABSTRACT
We give an example of a Point Source Microscope (PSM) and describe its uses as an aid in the alignment of optical
systems including the referencing of optical to mechanical datums. The PSM is a small package (about 100x150x30
mm), including a point source of light, beam splitter, microscope objective and digital CCD camera to detect the
reflected light spot. A software package in conjunction with a computer video display locates the return image in three
degrees of freedom relative to an electronic spatial reference point. The PSM also includes a Köhler illumination source
so it may be used as a portable microscope for ordinary imaging and the microscope can be zoomed under computer
control. For added convenience, the laser diode point source can be made quite bright to facilitate initial alignment
under typical laboratory lighting conditions. The PSM is particularly useful in aligning optical systems that do not have
circular symmetry or are distributed in space such as off-axis systems. The PSM is also useful for referencing the
centers of curvatures of optical surfaces to mechanical datums of the structure in which the optics are mounted. By
removing the microscope objective the PSM can be used as an electronic autocollimator because of the infinite
conjugate optical design.
Keywords: Optical alignment, optical testing, optical test instrumentation, microscope, autocollimator, software
1. INTRODUCTION
In the last decade or two the optics community has seen huge strides made in the improvement of optical image quality
due to the widespread availability of phase-measuring quantitative-interferometry. Surface topography data from phase
measuring interferometers is now commonly used by fine figuring processes such as ion milling1, MRF2 and other
computer controlled polishing methods to produce optical surfaces accurate to a few nanometers peak-to-valley. A few
decades ago one would have asked “Why do you want surface figure this good?” With the luxury of hindsight we see
that some of the applications for highly precise figure include the optics that corrected the error in the Hubble Space
Telescope and the ever increasing demands of the semiconductor industry.
With an eye on the past it is clear that if another significant improvement in overall optical quality could be made in
optical systems there would be applications waiting for those improvements. However, it is probably unrealistic to
assume that the optical figure quality of surfaces can be made much better, or at least better at an affordable cost. On the
other hand there is an area where significant improvements can be made; the alignment of the surfaces within an optical
system to one another. The same sorts of optical performance improvement that have been made in figure can be
achieved by the alignment of optical components to tighter tolerances. What is needed to accomplish this are the tools,
and a new way of thinking about achieving better alignment.
There are at least three reasons to think that improvements could be made in alignment. The majority of optical systems
are getting smaller which means the absolute tolerances are getting tighter. As the optical tolerances get tighter, the
tolerances on mating features of cell and lens get tighter and become prohibitively expensive to manufacture. Finally,
using the periphery and seat of an optical element to control centering is operating at the optically insensitive end of the
optical lever arm. Optics should be centered based on aligning their centers of curvature directly, again for at least two
reasons. The edges and seats of lenses and cells have a poor finish relative to the optical surfaces and it is difficult to
impossible to control a tolerance to better than the finish of the part. An optical surface is fabricated well enough to
produce a return spot a few microns in diameter at its center of curvature. These spots can be located to a small fraction
of their diameter in space and provide the information to align centers of curvature coaxially, or in three dimensional
space, to a micron or so.
Optomechanics 2005, edited by Alson E. Hatheway, Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 5877 (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2005)
0277-786X/05/$15 · doi: 10.1117/12.618165
First we will describe the PSM and explain of how it works along with the companion PSM Align©4 software. Then we
give several examples of how the PSM is used to align various types of optical systems using contrasting alignment
techniques. Finally we will discuss how the PSM compares with other commercially available alignment instruments.
Fig. 1 Light paths in the PSM showing the two sources of illumination and the cat’s eye reflection produced by the point source
Both light sources are controlled though the companion computer by the PSM Align© software and may be used one at
a time or simultaneously as well as adjusted in intensity. The diffuse, Köhler illumination is used for metallographic
imaging of opaque surfaces while the point source produces a cat’s eye retro-reflection from a surface at the microscope
objective focus that produces a bright spot on a dark background on the video screen as seen in Fig. 2 (middle).
Fig. 2 LED array in a 5x microphotograph using Köhler illumination only (left), point source only off a rough surface causing
distortion of the retro-reflected spot and a software generated reference crosshair (middle), and both sources of illumination on the
printing of a business card showing the retro-reflection from a non-specular surface (right). All images made with Nikon objectives5.
tMfhlwm
+ Pc9
8-bit
X: U
Y: U
Fig. 3 The four PSM Align© user interface windows as they appear simultaneously on the monitor screen. The windows may be
positioned arbitrarily by the user.
When the cursor is positioned over a particular pixel, the IMAQ toolbox gives the x and y pixel location and the 8-bit
intensity (gray value). These tools also allow zoom and un-zoom centered on the cursor position. The PSM Align©
“Thresholds” tab illustrated is used to set the thresholds in the binary video window and include intensity and adjacent
pixel areas as well as geometrical parameters. The control panel also manages the camera shutter and gain, image snap,
save and load, image feature size and location relative to a settable reference crosshair location. The illumination source
and intensity are also set here. This completes a brief summary of the hardware and software features of the PSM. The
balance of the paper illustrates how these features are used in various alignment applications.
Poight source - -u
Objective focus not at center
Poor focus of curvature of mirror
de-centered on camer a I
CD camera
Fig. 4 PSM objective focus at the exact center of curvature of a concave sphere (left) and displaced laterally and in focus (right)
As can be seen in the right half of Fig. 4, if the PSM objective focus is not coincident with the center of curvature of the
sphere the return image will neither be centered on the out-going focus nor well focused. Consequently, the return spot
centroid will be shifted laterally on the CCD array and be out-of-focus. With any practically useful microscope
objective (5x to 50x and sufficient numerical aperture) the PSM has 1 µm or less lateral sensitivity when used in
conjunction with the PSM Align© software and a focus sensitivity of about 1 µm when used with a 20x or 50x objective.
The PSM can equally well be used with convex spheres, the only requirement is that the radius of the sphere is less than
the working distance of the objective, or that an auxiliary lens is used to create a long working distance as will be
illustrated in the example of the doublet below. Because the PSM can be used with convex spheres and cylinders many
kinds of mechanical tooling hardware become practical and useful optical alignment tooling. Some examples of this
tooling are shown in Fig. 5. Surprisingly, these mechanical spheres and cylinders are very accurate figure-wise and are
inexpensive compared to most optical hardware. CERBEC™ silicon nitride balls8 are rounder and have better finish
than the best chrome steel balls plus are opaque and approximately match the reflectivity of bare glass.
/,3
Fig. 5 Mechanical tooling hardware including cylinders (plug gauges and locating pins), spheres (bearing balls and tooling balls), and
plane mirrors (gauge block target mirrors).
Finally, it should be noted that the PSM also works as an electronic autocollimator when the objective is removed and
that is why we have shown the gauge block target mirror among the tooling in Fig. 5. A collimated 6.5 mm diameter
Gaussian beam exits the PSM with no objective, is reflected by a plane specular surface and is focused on the CCD
detector by the internal tube lens. In the autocollimator mode the angular sensitivity is better than 5 seconds.
Mindful of the background in Sec. 3.1 on using the PSM at the center of curvature, consider cementing an f/5 doublet
objective. Assume the flint is sitting on a cup on a precision rotary table, the surface to be cemented facing up as shown
in Fig. 6 (left). This element has been centered with the PSM so that the reflected images from both surfaces are
stationary as the table is rotated. The rear (flatter) surface is viewed through the upper surface via an auxiliary lens to
converge the light enough to get convergence of the reflected light, in other words, to give the PSM a long working
distance to get at the apparent center of curvature. A lens design program is used to find the correct conjugates and, in
general, there will be spherical aberration in the return image. If the spherical aberration is objectionably large, the
aperture of the lens can be stopped down to the limit where diffraction begins to make the spot larger rather than
smaller. The upper surface can be viewed directly at its center of curvature.
As was explained at the beginning of this section, this example illustrates how to use the PSM for cementing a doublet
even though the optical parameters do not warrant this degree of precision and accuracy. There are cases not
substantially different from this example for wide field of view projection systems or very fast imaging lenses used in
the visible where these sort of centering tolerances are necessary to obtain the desired lens performance. The next
example is one where the alignment accuracy is definitely needed.
In the example Offner relay used, the total field is about 90 µm in width, the distance from the object plane to the
primary is 250 mm and the object is 40 mm off the axis of symmetry. Given this design, Fig. 7 shows the effect
decentering or despacing have on performance. Not unexpectedly, performance at the edge of the field is worse than the
center but also the image plane is tilted. Knowing the tilt would allow compensating or correcting for the error. Clearly
the biggest loss in performance is despace but this can also be corrected by an axial shift in the image plane.
0.95
0.9
0.85
0.8
Near field edge y dec
Strehl ratio
0.65
0.6
0.55
0.5
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Decenter or despace (um)
Fig. 7 The effect of decenter or despace on the Strehl ratio of the Offner 1:1 relay in the example
The PSM is particularly useful if some thought to alignment has been made in the initial system opto-mechanical design
by incorporating features such as tooling balls to locate critical datums. Assuming critical datums have been defined
mechanically, we start the alignment by placing a ball where the two mirrors have their common centers of curvature.
Move the PSM so it faces the primary mirror and align the PSM focus to the center of the ball as in Fig. 8c. Remove the
ball and align the primary to the PSM focus so light reflected from the primary is centered on the PSM image and is in
focus. Now the two mirrors are concentric and located precisely to the optical bench datum indicated by the ball.
Once the Offner relay is aligned optically and located precisely to its mechanical structure via the tooling ball, light
from an object on one side of the system axis of symmetry will be nearly perfectly imaged on the other side of the axis.
The relay will have been optimized for a particular object distance off the axis but this distance is not highly critical to
the relay performance. It is important to know exactly where the input is imaged on the other side of the axis. If a
tooling ball is placed so that its center is at the center of the object field, the PSM can precisely determine where the
image will be located by using the relay in double pass, see Fig. 8d. Light from the point source in the PSM is brought
to focus by the PSM objective and sent on through the relay until it reflects off the center of the ball located with its
center at the object plane of the relay. The light then retraces itself exactly back to the PSM focus where it is imaged by
the CCD and its location shown on the video monitor. When the return spot is centered in the reference cross hair and is
at best focus, the PSM focus is in focus at the center of the relay image plane. This check of object and image location
also permits a double check that the alignment was done correctly, something that is always useful when the tolerances
are tight.
Secondary mirror
Ball at common center of
curvature
Ball at common center of curvature
Fig. 8a Offner 1:1 relay wit ball at center of curvature Fig. 8b Secondary aligned to PSM via auxiliary lens
Fig. 8c Primary aligned directly to ball Fig. 8d PSM locating Offner center of image field
Secondary
Prism housing
Optical axis
Mounting plate
The telescope on the left of the mounting plate is an off-axis Ritchey-Chretien with an f/11 output as shown in Figure 9.
The telescope and the prism housing are attached to the mounting plate by a three ball and groove kinematic mounting
scheme, one coupling of which is shown in Fig. 10. Drilled balls fit into conical countersunk recesses in the telescope
frame and prism housing. The two halves are pulled together by a screw through the center of the balls and are located
by a pair of pins forming a double sided “V” groove in the mounting plate. In this way the two halves of the telescope
are precisely located relative to each other and flexing of the mounting plate (by which the telescope assembly is held in
its housing) will not disturb the alignment of the telescope system. Test fixtures for both sides of the telescope system
used the same mounting scheme to accurately locate the halves during individual assembly and test.
P
through holes
Telescope frame
/
I'
I
Conical countersunk
recesses
Mounting plate
1
Pins forming double
sided “V” groove Prism housing
Fig. 10 Kinematic mount detail showing one mounting point with two pins forming a double sided “V” groove
Fig. 11 Telescope frame held to the test fixture via kinematic mounts.
The off-axis primary mirror is visible at the left end of the frame
The telescope mirrors were then aligned in two steps against a collimator, first the primary alone and then the
combination of primary and secondary. Initially the PSM was positioned so that it was looking into the center of the
primary with its focus at the center of the ball at the primary focus. The collimator was then de-focused to produce a
focus far behind the primary at the long focus of the hyperbolic primary. The source in the collimator also had to be
raised precisely because the optical axis of the collimator and telescope were at known but different heights.
Once the PSM was aligned with the ball defining the location of the primary short focus, the ball was removed so the
PSM could view the light from the collimator and focused by the primary. It was necessary to adjust the primary in five
degrees of freedom, three to correctly position the focus and two to remove the aberrations caused by the primary
optical axis not lying on the collimator axis. First the primary was adjusted so that light from the collimator and
reflected by the primary was in focus and centered on the PSM crosshairs and in the computer monitor. This process
aligned the first three degrees of freedom but the image showed substantial astigmatism, exactly what would be
expected from a misaligned off-axis hyperbola.11 (It should be noted that since this was an off-axis telescope the
aberration was largely astigmatism with a little coma and the two aberrations decreased together as the primary was
aligned. Had this been a symmetrical telescope the only aberration seen due to misalignment would have been coma.)
The next step was to adjust the primary tilt and decenter to maintain the image centration and focus on the PSM
crosshairs and to reduce the astigmatism. The most straight forward method of doing this is tilt and decenter sideways to
straighten the astigmatic image so it is perpendicular to the optical table. Then adjust vertically relative to the table to
reduce the length of the image until it is round and symmetrical. This procedure worked in a quick, directed fashion.
The images observed with the PSM corresponded to the images in reference 11. Further, the PSM had sufficient
magnification to view the “star” image to reduce the astigmatism to at least the tenth wave level. The star test is very
sensitive to symmetry in the image and by going through focus the least astigmatism is very apparent.
Once the primary was adjusted so that it focused in the correct location and was free of aberrations indicating that its
optical axis and the mechanical optical axis were coincident and parallel to the collimator axis, the PSM was mounted
looking into the telescope centered on the secondary mirror aperture with its focus centered on the ball defining the
system focus. Alignment of the secondary followed the same sequence as the primary but now the collimator was set at
infinity focus with its source on axis. Fig. 12 shows this phase of the alignment with the PSM barely visible behind the
telescope while the monitor shows the image from the telescope in the crosshair. The kinematic base at which the ball
screwdriver is pointing accepts the posts (lying on their sides) that hold the balls that define the locations of the primary
and secondary foci.
First the secondary mirror was adjusted in tilt and decenter so that the image was centered on the PSM crosshairs and
was focused as well as could be determined given the residual astigmatism. Then the secondary was adjusted using a
combination of tilt and decenter to reduce the astigmatism to give a well focused, symmetrical image while keeping the
image centered on the PSM display crosshairs. Once this alignment had been performed we knew that the telescope
focus was located the correct distance behind the test fixture and that the optical axis of the telescope as defined by the
line between the primary focus and the telescope of secondary focus was perpendicular to the test fixture and correctly
positioned relative to the three kinematic mounting locations on the test fixture.
The main difference between this telescope alignment technique and those described previously is that by using
aberrations as well as locations, the PSM can monitor alignment in five degrees of freedom, something that would be
impossible using an alignment telescope. Further, because the PSM operates with a relatively fast cone of light it is
much less confusing than an alignment telescope in terms of selecting the reflection from the surface of interest. The
alignment of telescope took less than a day and the secondary, which had more refined adjustments on the mount, took
less than ½ hour including PSM setup time.
Fig. 12 Secondary mirror alignment phase with PSM behind the telescope, the image spot on the PSM computer monitor and
kinematic locating bases for the posts (lying on their sides) and balls that define conjugate locations
interchangeable with the telescopes so the center of the field had to be defined relative to a mechanical datum, namely
the mounting plate coupling the telescope to the prism housing. To align these various paths two fixtures were used, a
projector that produced a converging cone of light that matched the telescopes f/11 focus and a mounting fixture for the
prism housing that exactly simulated the mounting plate. This approach is shown schematically in Fig. 13 where the ball
in the foreground represents the projector source; the joined base of the cones represents a positive lens to produce the
f/11 cone that ends with the far ball at the conjugate focus.
Image of source
0
Relay lens
Fig. 13 Location of the source projector relative Fig. 14 The various optical paths produced by the prisms
to the prism housing in the housing with a ball centered at the focus of each
Figure 14 shows the prisms in the housing and the paths into which the prisms direct the beams. These beams need to be
correctly positioned to a few pixels on each detector so the final alignment can be accomplished by a very slight lateral
adjustment of the sensors themselves. To accomplish this, the test fixture that held the prism housing was drilled and
bushings inserted directly beneath the foci of the various paths and rods of the correct lengths were cut to hold balls at
the foci as shown in Fig. 15, a picture of the actual fixture set up for locating one of the paths.
)T Th.
Prisms and
fold mirrors
Fig. 15 Prism housing mounted to the test fixture with ball on metering rod to define the path focus and the PSM adjusted using the
x-y-z stage so the its objective focus is at the center of the ball in the three translational degrees of freedom
Figure 15 is instructive in that it shows almost all of the elements of the alignment discussed to this point. The f/11 light
cone is coming in from the left and going through the prism visible in the prism housing that is attached to the test
fixture via the three kinematic locators clearly visible on the back of the fixture. A metering rod is located in one of the
bushings and has a ball sitting on its top. The PSM is aligned pointing down the diverted beam path and the PSM
objective focus is aligned to the center of the ball. The PSM is supported by a substantial x-y-z stage to facilitate its
alignment with the ball center. The PSM tilt adjustments are relaxed because they only control vignetting.
The next step in the alignment of this beam path was to remove the ball and metering rod so light diverted by the prism
could be viewed by the PSM. Crude adjustment of the prism was made with the projector source set at maximum
intensity. The focus of the projected beam was easily visible on a card in front of the objective and the prism was tapped
lightly to tilt the prism and bring the beam focus in front of the objective. Once the beam entered the objective the
source intensity was reduced and the beam position monitored on the computer display. The real-time visual feedback
of spot location and focus made positioning the prism straightforward and rapid. Another feature of the PSM allows
left/right and up/down image flips so the displayed image always had the expected or natural orientation independent of
mirror flips of the beam. This ergonomic feature make alignment easier because adjustments appear to work in the
direction expected instead of the way they actually move.
Using the CMM eliminates two aspects of the fixture. Using the example of the prisms above, a source projector is still
required but the location of the source focus and the position of the optical axis can be determined using the PSM and
stored in the CMM. To accomplish this, the first step is to mount the PSM on the CMM ram in place of a touch tip
probe and set the probe tip radius set to zero in the CMM software. Next the PSM objective is focused at the center of
the CMM master ball and the coordinate system zeroed in all three directions simultaneously. Then the PSM is moved
to the projector source and the PSM focus made coincident with the source focus. The coordinates of the source are
noted. Then the PSM is moved to the image of the source and that location noted. This defines the five degrees of
freedom of the source location as shown in Fig. 16, four degrees define the axis and one is the axial location of the
focus.
Fig. 16 PSM used in five positions on a CMM to locate the source projector axis and focus (2 - left facing),
and prism housing (3 - right facing)
Now the PSM would be rotated 180 degrees about a vertical axis and the PSM focus zeroed again on the master ball.
Then the locations of the three balls defining the location of the prism holder can be found, see Fig. 16. The telescope
mechanical design defines where these three balls must be relative to the optical axis and focus of the source projector
to be aligned. Using COTS alignment stages the prism housing can be brought into alignment with those three positions
to locate it correctly relative to the source projector. Once the housing is correctly positioned, the PSM can be rotated to
look down the first path to be aligned, zeroed again on the master ball and moved to the first path focus ready to sense
the position of the first beam. The CMM software displays the global coordinates of PSM objective focus after each
zeroing on the master ball. All that is necessary is to read from the design where the next focus is and move the PSM to
that location and lock the CMM axis motions until the prism is aligned. Once the concept of using a CMM as an
assembly tool is understood, the implementation is straight forward, and the CMM takes on added value as an assembly
tool in addition to its traditional use as an inspection tool through use of the PSM.
Now that various methods of using the PSM for the alignment of complex optical systems has been explained, we
compare the features of the PSM with other more familiar optical alignment tooling. First, it should be said that the
PSM is a compliment to existing tooling, not a replacement for it. For example, in Figs. 12 and 15 an alignment
telescope is clearly visible. At the same time, there are other situations where it is very handy to have more than one
PSM available.
4.1 Autocollimators
Although no examples have been given of the PSM used as an autocollimator, it is one if the objective is removed
because the microscope is based on infinite conjugate optics. With the 100 mm tube lens and tenth pixel sensitivity, the
PSM has angular sensitivity of about 5 seconds in reflection over a 6 mm beam diameter. While this is almost an order
of magnitude worse than what can be achieved with a Davidson14 or Nikon15 autocollimator, there are situations where
this electronic autocollimating capability is very useful, particularly in cramped locations and for use in conjunction
with a CMM to move the PSM without pitch or yaw from interrogating one plane surface to another for parallelism.
An ergonomic feature of the PSM in this mode is the display on a computer monitor as opposed to looking through an
eyepiece that might not be conveniently located. A very practical advantage of the PSM used as an autocollimator is
that it is easy to align initially under normal lab lighting because of the bright laser source. With the more traditional
autocollimators it is often difficult to find the return beam initially even if the lab lights are turned off.
The PSM is perhaps best thought of as a null or end point detector in three dimensions and it does this to about 1 µm
laterally and a few µm axially. The ideal way to use the PSM is either mounted on the ram of a CMM where it can
locate spherical and cylindrical features to better than the accuracy of most CMM’s over any reasonable distance, or in
conjunction with a fixture like that described for aligning the prisms. In both cases, the PSM can locate centers of
curvature and axes of cylinders to as well as or better than the mechanics of the CMM, or fixtures can establish the
desired mechanical datums in three dimensional space. In this sense the PSM has a sensitivity of at least an order of
magnitude better than an alignment telescope. Coupled with its small size, light weight, ability to be used as an
autocollimator and ergonomically convenient to use display, the PSM can turn tedious assembly and alignment
operations into rapid, accurate and easily documented procedures.
We have described the Point Source Microscope and illustrated its usefulness in the alignment of various optical
systems by accurately linking mechanical datums to optically functional surfaces and these surfaces to each other. In
comparison with other optical tooling, the PSM is a flexible compliment to, rather than replacement for, traditional
autocollimators and alignment telescopes. A combination of the PSM’s accuracy and its use aligning the optically
significant features of an opto-mechanical system make it possible to achieve higher alignment accuracy than
attempting alignment via strictly mechanical features. This leads to systems with better optical performance than can
presently be achieved at a reasonable cost.
With insight as to how the PSM works it is clear that the PSM, in a very practical sense, makes many alignment
operations easier and quicker to perform to a higher level of accuracy, particularly for optical systems that are
distributed in three, rather than two, dimensions, or do not have circular symmetry. Although difficult to document
specifically, we have seen the time taken to align complex optical systems drop by a factor of ten while achieving better
alignment than more traditional methods. Furthermore, by aligning using the optically functional surfaces of a system,
both tolerance build up and the expense of precisely made parts can be largely eliminated.
6. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The telescope referred to in Sec. 3.4 was a team effort of Breault Research Organization, Inc (BRO)16 and Optical
Perspectives Group, LLC (OPG). The lead optical engineer on the project was Matthew Dubin of BRO who had many
insightful and useful comments regarding the use of the PSM. OPG’s primary responsibility was assembly and test of
the system that was performed at BRO with the able assistance of Joe Barcelo. The optical design of the telescope and
sensor optics was performed by Richard Buchroeder of Optical Design Service under contract to BRO. The mechanical
design of the telescope was done by Kris Tvedt of BRO. The details of the kinematic location features were due to
Bryan Loucks, an opto-mechanical design consultant working with OPG.
7. REFERENCES
1
See [Link]/[Link], for example
2
[Link]/technology/[Link]
3
US Patent pending
4
[Link]
5
[Link]/eng/page/products/[Link]
6
[Link]/products/flea/[Link]
7
[Link]/nips/cds/view/p/lang/en/nid/12892
8
[Link]/TechInfo/[Link]
9
A. Offner, US Patent 3,748,015
10
D. M. Williamson, “Evolution of ring field systems in microlithography”, Proc. SPIE, 3482, 369-76, (1998).
11
R. E. Parks, “Alignment of off-axis conic mirrors”, Optical Fabrication and Testing Workshop Technical Notebook, OSA,
Falmouth, MA Sept. 1980, pp. 139-45. Revised reprint available at [Link]/Documents/Alignment%20of%20Off-
axis%20Conic%[Link]
[Link].
12
R. E. Parks and W. P. Kuhn, “Using a CMM for optical system assembly and alignment”, ASPE Proceedings Spring Topical
Meeting on Coordinate Measuring Machines, 29, 3-8, (2003)
13
US Patent Application 20020054296
14
[Link]/[Link]
15
[Link]/[Link]?cat=3&grp=30&productNr=6B6D
16
[Link]/consulting/[Link]