Canada's Treatment of Plains Cree: Myths Unveiled
Canada's Treatment of Plains Cree: Myths Unveiled
TOBIAS
${protocol}://[Link]/doi/pdf/10.3138/CHR-064-04-04 - Tuesday, June 25, 2019 11:21:10 AM - University of Saskatchewan IP Address:[Link]
Canada'sSubjugationof
thePlains Cree,ß879- 885
CanadianHistoricalReview,Lx•v, 4, • 983
ooo8-3755/83/ • 2oo-o5 • 9 $o•. 25/o¸ Universityof TorontoPress
520 THE CANADIAN HISTORICAL REVIEW
${protocol}://[Link]/doi/pdf/10.3138/CHR-064-04-04 - Tuesday, June 25, 2019 11:21:10 AM - University of Saskatchewan IP Address:[Link]
In adoptingthisposition,theCreeweresimplydemonstrating a skill
thattheyhadshownsincetheirinitialcontactwithEuropeans in x67o.
On numerousoccasions duringthefur tradeera,theyhadadaptedto
changedenvironmental and economic circumstances, beginningfirst
ashunters,thenasprovisioners and middlemenin the Hudson'sBay
Companytradingsystem,and finallyadaptingfrom a woodlandto
parkland-prairie buffalohuntingculturetoretaintheirindependence
and their desiredties with the fur trade.•ø Having accommodated
themselves to the PlainsIndian cultureafter x8oo,theyexpandedinto
territoryformerlycontrolledby the Atsina,and asthe buffaloherds
began to declineafter x85o, the Cree expandedinto Blackfoot
territory.• Expansionwas one responseto the threat posedby
decliningbuffaloherds;anotherwasthat somePlainsCree bands
beganto turn to agriculture. •2 Thus, whenthe Cree learnedthat
Canadaclaimedtheir lands, part of the arrangementthey were
•3 Morris,Treaties
ofCanada,77-•23 and •68-239, discusses
the negotiations
of
Treaties4 and6 withtheCreeandhowhe wasforcedto [Link]
described is the Cree concern about their land. The reaction of the Mackenzie
government isdetailedin •,^c,Ro •o, vol.3636,file 6694-2andin particular,
Ministerof the InteriorReportto PrivyCouncil,3• Jan. •877 andorder-in-council,
•o Feb. •877.
•4 Milloy,'The PlainsCree'25o-62; AlexanderJohnson,TheBattleatBellyRiver:
Stories
of theLastGreatIndianBattle(Lethbridge• 966)
•5 HenryYouleHind, vol. •, pp 334, 36ø-•, carriesreportsof Mistickoos
or Short
Stick's comments on a cot•ncil of Cree leaders that resolved to limit white and
Metishuntingprivileges.
Viscount
[Link],TheNorthwest Passage
byLand,BeingtheNarrative
ofanExpedition
fromtheAtlantic
tothePacific,
66, 67,
contains comments on the Cree determination to limit non-Indian involvement in
the hunt. •'^M,E. AdamsArchibaldPapers,letter#2oo, Macdonaldto Archibald,
14 Feb. 1871;letter#•7 o, Englishhalfbreedsto Archibald,•oJan. •87•, all stress
that Creewere takingactionto limit non-Indianinvolvementin the buffalo
hunt.
•6 Morris, Treaties
of Canada,24•
524 THE CANADIAN HISTORICAL REVIEW
${protocol}://[Link]/doi/pdf/10.3138/CHR-064-04-04 - Tuesday, June 25, 2019 11:21:10 AM - University of Saskatchewan IP Address:[Link]
the Cree. Oral tradition among the Cree maintainsthat all three
leaderswishedto see how faithful the governmentwould be in
honouringthetreaties,•7butequallyimportantfor allthreeleaderswas
their belief that the treatieswere inadequateand that revisions
were
necessary. PiapotthoughtTreaty4 (theQu'AppelleTreaty)neededto
be expandedto includeincreasedfarm equipmentand tools,and to
stipulatethat the governmenthad to providemills,blacksmithand
carpentryshopsand tools,and instructors in farmingand the trades.
Only after receivingassurances that Ottawa would considerthese
requests
did Piapottaketreatyin •875.•s Big BearandLittlePine
objectedto Treaty 6 (Fort Pitt and Carlton) becauseCommissioner
Morrishadmadeclearthatin takingtreatytheCreewouldbeboundby
[Link] acceptthe treatieswouldmeanbeingsubjectto an
externalauthorityof whichthe Creeshadlittleknowledge andupon
[Link] LittlePinewould
countenancesucha lossof autonomy.
BigBearhadraisedthematterof Creeautonomyat FortPittin • 876
whenhe met Commissioner [Link] thattimeBig Bearsaid:'I will
makea requestthat he [Morris]saveme from what I mostdread,thatis
theropeaboutmyneck... It wasnotgivento usto havetheropeabout
our neck.'•9 Morrisand mostsubsequent historianshaveinterpreted
BigBear'sstatements to bea specific
referenceto hanging,butsuchan
interpretation ignoresthefactthatBigBear,likemostIndianleaders,
oftenuseda metaphorto emphasizea [Link] • 875, he hadmadethe
samepointbyusinga differentmetaphor whenhespoketo messengers
informinghim that a treatycommission wasto meetwith the Cree in
•876. At that time Big Bear said: 'We want none of the Queen's
presents: whenwe seta foxtrapwe scatterpiecesof meatall around,
butwhenthe fox getsinto the trapwe knockhim on thehead;wewant
no bait ...,20A more accurateinterpretationof Big Bear'swordsto
Morrisin • 876isthathefearedbeingcontrolled or 'enslaved,'just
asan
animaliscontrolledwhenit hasa ropearounditsneck.2•In • 877,when
•7 InterviewwithWalterGordon,Directorof theIndianRightsandTreatiesPro-
gram,Federation of SaskatchewanIndians,Mar. • [Link] madea similar
statementin aninterviewquotedin 'IndianAffairs,'Saskatchewan Herald,• Aug.
• [Link] importanceof Big Bear,Piapot,and LittlePinecannotbeunderesti-
mated,forof thoseCreechiefswhotooktreatyonlySweetgrass hadthestandingof
thesemen,andSweetgrass diedwithina fewmonths of takingtreaty.
•8 Morris, Treaties
of Canada,85-7. More detailedinformationon the adhesions
of
PiapotandCheekukisto befoundin •'•,c,l• •o, vol.36•5, file5489;[Link]
to Laird, 7 Oct. •875
•9 Morris,Treaties
ofCanada,
•4o for thequotation.
Seep 355 for theclauses
in
Treaty 6 respectingacceptanceof Canadianlaws.
•o Ibid., •74
• • Fraser,
'BigBear,IndianPatriot'76-7 agrees
thatBigBearwasnotreferringspeci-
ficallyto hangingbut to the effectthetreatywouldhaveon the Cree.
CANADA'S SUBJUGATION OF THE PLAINS CREE 525
${protocol}://[Link]/doi/pdf/10.3138/CHR-064-04-04 - Tuesday, June 25, 2019 11:21:10 AM - University of Saskatchewan IP Address:[Link]
22 PAC,RG10, vol. 3656, file 9093, Agent Dickiesonto [Link], •4 Sept. •877
•3 PAC,RG2o,vol. 3648, file 838o;vol. 3655,file 9ooo,Laird to Ministerof the Interior,
9 May •878
•4 PAC,RG•o, vol. 3655, file 9ooo,Laird to Ministerof the Interior, 9 May •878; vol.
3636,file 9o9•, Laird to Superintendent-General, •9 Nov. •877; PAC,RG2o,vol.
367o, file •o,771, Laird to Ministerof the Interior, • Nov. •878. PAC,RG•o, vol.
367•, file • o,853,Dickiesonto Meredith,• Apr. • 878;vol.3656,file 9o9•, Inspector
JamesWalker to Laird, 5 Sept. [Link] Indian Affairs and Northern
Development,Ottawa,file •/•-• •-3, Laird to Ministerof the Interior, 3ø Dec.
•878; Dickiesonto Laird, 9 Oct. •878; Walker to Laird, 4 and •6 Feb. •879
(hereafter cited as D2AND,file, letter)
•5 PAC,RG•O,vol.3655,file •oo•, Lairdto Ministerof the Interior,9 May 2878;
vol.367•, file •9,853, Dickiesonto Vankoughnet,•6 July 2878;PAC,MG•6•, E.D.
Clark to Fred White, •6 July •879
•6 'Newsfrom the Plains,'Saskatchewan Herald, •8 Nov. 2878;'From the Plains,'Sas-
katchewan Herald,5 May • 879. 'ContradictoryNewsfrom the West,'FortBenton
Record,3 • Jan. • 879
526 THE CANADIAN HISTORICAL REVIEW
${protocol}://[Link]/doi/pdf/10.3138/CHR-064-04-04 - Tuesday, June 25, 2019 11:21:10 AM - University of Saskatchewan IP Address:[Link]
•7 e^c,Rc •o, vol. 367•, file •o,853, M.G. Dickiesonto Vankoughnet,26July •878;
Opening up theWest:BeingtheOfficialReports toParliament of theNorth-West Mounted
Policefrom•874-•88• (Toronto •973), Reportfor •878, p. •
•8 e^c, Rc •o, vol. 37o4, file •7,858, entire file; vol. 3648, file •6•-•, entire file.
Ibid.,vol. 3699, file •6,58o, order-in-council, 9 Oct. •879; vol.3766,file •,54•;
E.T. Gait to Superintendent-General of Indian Affairs,•7 July •88o; vol.373o, file
•6,•79 , entire file; vol. 3757, file • •,397, entire file
•9 Houseof Commons,Ottawa,Sessional Papers, XVII(1885), ReportNo. 3, •57
(hereafercitedascse,vol.,year,report);EdwardAhenakew,Voices ofthePlains
Cree,Ruth Buck,ed. (Toronto •973), •6. Dewdneyin adoptingthistacticsimply
copiedwhatthefur-tradingcompanies haddonein [Link] Creetolerated
suchpractices because theyimprovedthe opportunities to havebetteraccess to
[Link] J. Ray and Donald Freeman,'GiveUsGoodMea-
sure':AnEconomic Analysis ofRelations between theIndiansandtheHudson's BayCompany
before•763 (Toronto•978), [Link],Indiansin theFur Trade,passim, deals
with the samepracticein the post-•763 [Link],ThePlainsCree,
•o5- •o discusses thenatureof Creepoliticalorganization andleadership that
explainstheir acceptance of suchpractices.
CANADA'S SUBJUGATION OF THE PLAINS CREE 527
${protocol}://[Link]/doi/pdf/10.3138/CHR-064-04-04 - Tuesday, June 25, 2019 11:21:10 AM - University of Saskatchewan IP Address:[Link]
that any attempt to arrest the chief would result in a battle, Irvine
decidedto [Link]
council agreed that Piapot should receive a new reserve next to
Pasquah,in return for which Piapotwould return to Indian Head
temporarily.•4
The agreementreachedbetweenPiapotand Irvine and Reedwasa
victoryfor [Link] gettinga reserveat Qu'Appelleagain,Piapothad
approximately2,oooCreeconcentrated on the Qu'AppelleRiver,and
he wasable to hold his counciland thirst dance,for after goingto
Indian Head, he immediatelyturned aroundand wentto Pasquah's.
Reed and Irvine were aware of Piapot'sruse, but did nothing to
preventhis holdingthe council,for they were awarethat the Cree at
Qu'Appelle were prepared to protectPiapot from what the Indians
regardedas an attack on their leader. Realizingthe effect that an
Indian warwouldhaveon possible settlement,andthatthe policewere
inadequatefor sucha clash,the Canadian officialswishedto avoid
givingcausefor violentreactionby the Cree.• Piapotactedashe did
becausehe realized that if any blood were shed the Cree would
experiencea fate similar to that of the Nez Perc6s,Blackfoot,and
DakotaSiouxin thosepeoples'conflictswith the United States.
Dewdneyandthe policewereto havea similarexperiencewhenthey
attemptedto preventBig Bear from holdinga thirstdanceandcouncil
atPoundmaker's reserveinJune• [Link]'s
council, to which the old chief had invited the Blackfoot and all the
Indiansfrom Treaty 6, wouldresultin a largerconcentration of Cree
than Little Pine had already effected at Battleford. Dewdneyalso
believedthat he had to undo what Little Pinehad accomplished, and
refusedto grantLittle Pineand LuckyMan the reservesitestheyhad
requestednext to [Link] Bearwasagaintold that he would
not be granteda reservein the [Link]
that the Cree chiefswould ignore his order to selectreservesitesat
some distance from Battleford, and that this could be used as a reason
for arrestingthem. To legitimizesuchactionson his part, Dewdney
askedthe governmentto passan order-in-councilto makeit a criminal
offence for a band to refuse to move to a reserve site the Commissioner
suggested.
•6In ordertoavoidviolence
whenheattempted
toprevent
54 Ibid.,vol.3745,file •,9,5o6-4(2),
Reedto Irvine, 18May 1884;Irvineto Comptroller
FredWhite,•'7 May 1884;Whiteto Vankoughnet,19 May 1884
55 Ibid., AgentMacdonaldto Commissioner, •'9 May 1884;vol. 3655,file 9o•,6,
Dewdneyto Superintendent-General, 13June 1884
56 •'ac,Rc lO,vol.3745,file •,9,5o6-4(•),Reedto Superintendent-General, 19Apr.
[Link] vol.3576,file 3o9B.•'ac,Mc •,6a,file 37, Dewdneyto
Macdonald,3 May [Link]'s requestand actionswerecontraryto whatthe
536 THE CANADIAN HISTORICAL REVIEW
${protocol}://[Link]/doi/pdf/10.3138/CHR-064-04-04 - Tuesday, June 25, 2019 11:21:10 AM - University of Saskatchewan IP Address:[Link]
movement.
64BigBear,LuckyMan,andPoundmaker
wentto Duck
Lake for a council with the Cree leaders of the Lower Saskatchewan
district. The Duck Lake council, attended by twelve bands, was
initiatedby Beardyand the chiefsof the [Link],who
actedasspokesmanfor the Carlton chiefs,had beenrelativelyinactive
in the Cree movementsin the 1881- 3 period. He, however,had been
the most vehementcritic of the government'sfailure to deliver the
farm materialspromisedby the treaty commissioners. In the 1877-81
period,Beardywasa man of little influencein the Carlton area, but
when Mistawasis and Ahtahkakoop,the principalCree chiefsof the
CarltonDistrictcameto sharehisviews,Beardy'sstandingamongthe
CarltonCreerosedramatically.
65
The Duck Lake Council, called by Cree leaders who Dewdney
thoughtwereloyaland docile,and of whichthe Commissioner had no
foreknowledge, wasa causeof [Link] vexingwasthe
detailedlist of violationsof the treaty for whichthe Cree demanded
redressfrom the government. The Cree charged that the treaty
commissioners lied to them whentheysaidthatthe Cree wouldbe able
to makea living from agriculturewith the equipmentprovidedfor in
the [Link],rather than provideall the farming goods,what
the governmentdid, accordingto the Cree, wasto withholdmanyof
the cattleand oxen; send inferior qualitywagons,farm tools,and
equipment; and provide insufficientrations and clothes,and no
[Link] petition closedwith the statementexpressingthe
Cree sentiment that they had been deceived by 'sweet promises'
designedto cheat them of their heritage, and that unlesstheir
grievances
were remediedby the summerof 1885, they wouldtake
whatever
measures
necessary,
shortof war,togetredress.
66
Dewdneyoriginally assumed,as did somenewspapersacrossthe
West,that the Duck Lake Councilwaspart of a plot by Louis Riel to
foment an Indian and Metis rebellion. Dewdney'sassumptionwas
based on the fact that the Duck Lake Council was held a short time after
Riel had returned to Canada. It was also known that Riel had attended
it, and that he had advocated such an alliance and a resort to violence
when he had met with the Cree in Montana in 1880.67 Further
64 •'^c, Rc •o, vol. 3576, file 3o9B, Ray to Commissioner,3oJune •884; file 3o9^,
Rayto Commissioner,24, 29July • 884. •'^c,Mc 26^,vol. 2• 2, Dewdneyto
Macdonald,•4July •884; J.A. MacRaeto Commissioner, 7 Aug. 1884;vol. 107,Ray
to Commissioner,•'9July •884
65 •'^c,M• 26^, vol. •o7, Rayto Commissioner, 29 July and 2 Aug. 1884;J.A. MacRae
to Commissioner, •'9July •884
66 •'^c, R• •o, vol. 3697, file •5,423, J.A. MacRaeto Dewdney,25 Aug. •884
67 Ibid., Reedto Superintendent-General, 23Jan. •885; Reedto Dewdney,22, 25
Aug. • 884. •'^c,M• 26^,vol. • o7,J.A. MacRaeto Commissioner, 29July • 884;J.M.
CANADA'S SUBJUGATION OF THE PLAINS CREE 539
${protocol}://[Link]/doi/pdf/10.3138/CHR-064-04-04 - Tuesday, June 25, 2019 11:21:10 AM - University of Saskatchewan IP Address:[Link]
72 Statutesof Canada,43 Vict. I, cap. 27, 'An Act to Amend the Indian Act, •88o,'
•2 Apr. [Link],MG26^, vol. 107, Dewdneyto Macdonald,24 Aug. •884
73 P^c,Mc 26^,vol. 2• 2, Reedto Dewdney,7 Sept.•884; vol. •o7, Dewdneyto
Macdonald,24 Aug. • 884
74 P^c,Rc •o, vol. 3576, file 3o9^, Reedto Dewdney,•2 Sept. •884; vol. 3745,file
29,5o6-4(2),Reedto Dewdney,•4 Sept. 1884;vol. 37o4,file 17,799,entirefile; vol.
3664, file 9834 and 9843; vol. 376•, file 3o,836,entirefile; DewdneyPapers,iv,
file 45, Reedto Dewdney,• 2 Sept. • 884; vol. IV, file 47, Crozierto Comptroller,
NWMP,4 Nov. •884; v, file 57, Crozierto Dewdney,3oJan. 1885
CANADA'S SUBJUGATION OF THE PLAINS CREE 541
${protocol}://[Link]/doi/pdf/10.3138/CHR-064-04-04 - Tuesday, June 25, 2019 11:21:10 AM - University of Saskatchewan IP Address:[Link]
87 Cameron,passim
88 CharlesMulvaney,TheHistoryof theNorth-West Rebellion of •885 (Toronto 1885),
2•,-•6. SettlersandRebels,1882 Report,pp 22, 26- 7. PAC,RG10, vol. 3584, file
x•3o, p. •, SuperintendentHerchmerto Dewdney,5 Apr. •885
89 Ibid.
9ø PAC,RG•O,vol. 3697, file •5,446, entirefile; vol. 3598, file •4• •, entirefile; vol.
7768, file 2•o9-2; vol. 3794, file 46,584
9•VAC,Mg27IC4, vol.7, letters,Dewdneyto White,Mar.-Apr. •885. This
correspondence revealsthat in earlyApr. Dewdneybelievedthat he hadto dealwith
an Indian [Link],he did admitthat thisimpression wasbasedon
scantyand often faultyor [Link] mid-Apr.,Dewdneymakesclearto
White,theNWMP Comptroller,thathe did notbelievethathewasdealingwith
eitheran Indian uprisingor a rebellion.
546 THE CANADIAN HISTORICAL REVIEW
${protocol}://[Link]/doi/pdf/10.3138/CHR-064-04-04 - Tuesday, June 25, 2019 11:21:10 AM - University of Saskatchewan IP Address:[Link]
Dewdney employed tactics such as arresting Cree leaders like Lucky Man and Little Pine, increasing the police presence at Battleford, and instructing Indian agents to purchase Cree's weapons to diminish their capacity for resistance. Despite these efforts, Big Bear's band still managed to elude authorities and gather at Battleford. This suggests a limited immediate effectiveness of Dewdney's methods as Cree leaders resisted and his tactics escalated tensions .
The Cree faced external pressures from American groups like the Crow and existing neighboring tribes whose territories they infrigebled on when seeking resources across borders. This competition for resources and fear of conflict with settlers significantly shaped Cree strategies, necessitating cautious treaty negotiations and occasional migrations .
The 1884-1885 amendments to the Indian Act, empowering authorities like Dewdney to arrest Cree leaders and restrict their movements, marked a significant tightening of Canadian policy aimed at dismantling Cree resistance and aspirations for territorial autonomy. This legislative change underscored the shift to a more aggressive policy framework intended to consolidate government control over Indigenous affairs .
Factors influencing the Cree's decisions included the threat of starvation, loss of buffalo herds, and pressure from Canadian authorities offering rations contingent on treaty acceptance. Leaders like Big Bear sought better terms, refusing immediate treaties in hopes of forming a unified Cree territory, while others accepted to avert immediate crises .
The Canadian government attempted to control Cree movements by denying them rations at Cypress Hills, closing Fort Walsh, and restricting their travel south to the US. These actions coerced the Cree to move northwards, aligning them with government reserves. Despite these measures, Cree efforts to consolidate at Cypress Hills continued, challenging government attempts at control .
Dewdney's enhanced control through new amendments and increased police presence aimed to suppress Cree resistance effectively. His actions limited Cree mobility and autonomy, making resistance difficult. However, his attempts to fracture Cree cohesion only led to more strategic demands for a concentrated territory .
Resource scarcity, particularly the lack of food due to buffalo depletion, forced the Cree to engage with Canadian authorities under unfavorable terms, such as agreeing to treaties to avoid starvation. This situation weakened their negotiating position, compelling them to seek rations and reserves through treaty agreements .
Dewdney transitioned from a purely coercive policy to a mixed approach of rewards and punishments, providing rations, farming tools, and incentives while increasing government surveillance of Cree activities. This change reflected an attempt to pacify the Cree while maintaining control. The implications included short-term appeasement but failed long-term integration, as Cree leaders continued efforts to centralize on their terms .
The Cree aimed to establish an autonomous Indian territory in Cypress Hills resembling reservation systems in the US, opposing Canadian policies of dispersal and control through isolated reserves. This fundamental conflict led to tensions and resistance, impelling further government efforts to subjugate and discourage Cree centralization .
Dewdney's policy disrupted traditional Cree dynamics, as selective rewards fragmented community unity by incentivizing cooperation with governmental policies under duress. This exacerbated internal divisions among leaders, influencing sociopolitical cohesion adversely and impacting long-term Cree strategies for autonomy .