Foundations of American Democracy Explained
Foundations of American Democracy Explained
Ideals of Democracy
Types of Democracy
● The US was created a democractic republic by the Founders, meaning that popular
sovereignty exists but people elect officials to represent their interests
● Many people therefore believe that United States citizens can influence government
actions, but different models of democracy have arisen that hold varying opinions.
● A democracy is a system of government in which the power of the government is vested
in the people, who rule directly or through elected representatives.
● Participatory democracy is a model of democracy in which citizens have the power to
decide directly on policy and politicians are responsible for implementing those policy
decisions.
○ Distinct from direct democracy, in which citizens are directly responsible for
policy decisions.
○ Participatory democracy can be represented through local and state forms of
government.
■ Town hall meetings
■ Initiatives allow citizens to bypass their state legislature by placing
proposed laws on the ballot
■ Popular referendums allow voters to approve or repeal an act of the state
legislature
● Pluralist democracy is a model of democracy in which no one group dominates politics
and organized groups compete with each other to influence policy.
○ Pluralist democracy is seen in both state and federal levels of government.
○ Individuals must work through groups formed around common causes.
○ Interest groups are groups of people who attempt to influence policymakers to
support their position on a particular common interest or concern.
■ Interest groups such as the NRA influence politicians through monetary
donations, lobbying, and testifying in Congressional hearings.
● Elite democracy is a model of democracy in which a small number of people, usually
those who are wealthy and well-educated, influence political decision making
○ The Electoral College is an example of elite democracy because it places a small
group in charge of making major political decisions, even if those decisions
contradict the popular will.
● The Articles of Confederation comprised the United States’ first constitution, lasting
from 1776 until 1789. The Articles established a weak central government and placed
most powers in the hands of the states.
○ After the Revolutionary War, America wanted their government to be the
antithesis of that of Great Britain, so they had a weak central government which
they later discovered couldn’t handle the issues faced by the nation.
○ The United States was a confederacy in which states were sovereign and linked
together for limited purposes like national defense. The national government had
few powers like coining money, managing the post office, and negotiating with
foreign powers.
○ The only branch of government was the legislative, the Confederation Congress,
where each state had one vote and 9/13 states had to approve a measure for it to
pass and 13/13 states had to agree to amend the Articles.
● The US economy faltered, since the central government lacked the power to enforce tax
laws or regulate commerce.
○ Only state governments could levy taxes to avoid “taxation without
representation” and the national government had to request money from negligent
states. Thus, paying war debts or securing new funds was difficult. Foreign
countries didn’t want to lend the US money because of their shoddy
representation and the currency was worthless.
○ Since the government also couldn’t impose tariffs on foreign imports or regulate
interstate commerce, it couldn’t protect American producers from foreign
competition.
● Shays’s Rebellion, an uprising of Revolutionary War veterans in Massachusetts that both
the state and national governments struggled to address due to a lack of centralized
military power, illustrated the need to create a stronger governing system.
○ The national government also couldn’t raise an army or navy, although it could
declare war/peace, and had to depend upon states to provide soldiers.
○ Revolutionary war veterans heavily in debt faced retributions, and demanded the
money the Confederation Congress had promised them for their service. But the
government didn’t have the money, so Daniel Shays led others to a courthouse
demanding relief. The MA militia sided with their cause, so the governor
requested help from the national government, but none was available.
○ Revealed the weakness of the Articles of Confederation because the US was
unable to pay its vets and raise a militia. The right to impose taxes, regulate
commerce, and raise an army was imperative.
● Federalists and Anti-Federalists wrote several essays on what type of government would
be strong enough to enforce order and not so strong as to violate the personal liberties of
American citizens. The former were trying to encourage ratification of the Constitution
and the latter prevent it.
● Federalist 10
○ James Madison, 1787
○ Critics of the Constitution argued that the proposed federal government was too
large and would be unresponsive
○ Madison argued that liberty would be safest in a large republic because of factions
and diversity would avoid tyranny
■ Factions inevitable and large government could control them
○ This diversity makes tyranny more difficult since ruling coalitions would always
be unstable
■ Groups would negotiate/compromise, solutions would respect minority
rights
■ Large size of country would make it difficult for factions to gain control
○ Explores minority v. majority rule
● Brutus 1
○ Under pen name, encouraged NY to reject the Constitution
○ Argued that states should not ratify the Constitution because condensing 13 into
one republic would give the federal government “absolute and uncontrollable
power” as shown under the Necessary and Proper clause and Supremacy
Clause
○ State government powerless
○ The federal government had too much power even before the Constitution, our
country won’t survive now because it is too big
● The commerce clause is in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution and gives Congress
the power to regulate interstate commerce (buying and selling of goods across state lines).
● The necessary and proper clause also known as the Elastic Clause is in Article I,
Section 8 of the Constitution and gives Congress the power to create laws that they find
“necessary and proper” for performing their constitutional responsibilities/enumerated
powers.
● Enumerated powers (also called expressed powers, explicit powers or delegated powers)
are powers of the federal government that are explicitly named in the Constitution.
● Implied powers are powers of the federal government that are not explicitly named in the
Constitution but are implied so that the federal government can carry out its enumerated
powers.
● The 9th Amendment states that rights not enumerated in the Constitution belong to the
people.
● The 10th Amendment stipulates that all powers not delegated to the federal government
or prohibited to the states are reserved to the states or the people.
○ Reserved Powers Clause
● The 14th Amendment grants citizenship, equal protection, and due process under the
law to all people born in the United States.
○ Due Process Clause: “nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law” is applicable to STATES
○ Equal Protection Clause: “not shall any state ... deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”
● McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
○ Confirmed the supremacy of the national government over the state government
■ Supremacy clause
○ In 1818, Maryland taxed the Second Bank of the United States
○ The Baltimore Branch Cashier McCulloch refused to pay
○ McCulloch brought to case to the Supreme Court, which 1) overturned the ruling
of a lower Court claiming the Bank was unconstitutional by citing the necessary
and proper clause (art 1, sec 8) and 2) said that Maryland couldn’t interfere with
congressional powers
● US v. Lopez (1995)
○ Limited national power in favor of state power; Congress may not use the
commerce clause to make possession of a gun in a school zone a federal crime
○ First case since 1937 in which the Court maintained that Congress had exceeded
its power under the commerce clause
○ High school student Lopez carried concealed weapon on school grounds and was
charged under federal law, the Gun Free Schools Zones Act of 1990
○ The Court ruled this act was unconstitutional because it exceeded the powers of
the commerce clause
Federalism in Action
● Public Policy
○ Agenda setting (i.e. identifying issues)
○ Policy formulation
○ Policy adoption/legitimization
○ Policy implementation
○ Policy assessment
First Amendment Freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and to petition
Establishment clause - prohibits the establishment of religion by
Congress
Free exercise clause - Congress shall make no law prohibiting
the free exercise of religion
Third Amendment Right to not quarter (or house) soldiers during time of war
Eighth Amendment Right to not face excessive bail, fines, or cruel and unusual
punishment
Ninth Amendment There are other rights besides the ones listed in the Bill of Rights
and the federal government cannot violate those rights
(unenumerated rights)
Tenth Amendment All powers not delegated to the national government or prohibited
to the states are reserved to states or to the people
Reserved Powers Clause
Bill of Rights:
● Protects individual personal liberty by limiting the federal government
● Civil liberties - The rights of citizens to be free from undue government interference in
their lives, including those rights guaranteed in the Bill of Rights and those established by
long legal precedent (such as the right to marry or travel freely)
● Civil rights - The rights of citizens to be free of unequal or discriminatory treatment on
the basis of race, gender, or membership in a particular demographic group
● Individual liberties - Constitutionally-established rights and freedoms protected by law
from interference by the government
1st Amendment:
● Establishment clause - no official religion or preferential treatment for or against a
religion
○ Engel v. Vitale (1962) - A case contesting a New York state law requiring
schoolchildren to recite a nondenominational prayer each morning (although
children could choose not to participate). A group of parents sued the state
arguing that the law was a violation of the establishment clause; the Supreme
Court ruled in their favor, judging that New York state was giving unconstitutional
government support to religion by providing the prayer.
○ Lemon test determines if a law violates the establishment clause devised by the
Supreme Court in the 1971 case Lemon v. Kurtzman. Based on the Lemon test,
laws are constitutional only if they have a legitimate secular purpose, neither
advance nor inhibit religion, and do not result in an “excessive government
entanglement” with religion.
● Free Exercise clause - the right to practice the religion of your choice
○ Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) - A Supreme Court case concerning the mandatory
schooling of three Amish students. The state of Wisconsin fined the students’
families for refusing to send them to school after the eighth grade; the Amish
families argued that higher education conflicted with the free exercise of their
religious beliefs. The Court ruled in their favor, holding that the 1st Amendment’s
protections for free exercise of religion outweighed the state’s interests in
compelling Amish students to attend school past the eighth grade.
● Freedom of Speech
○ Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) - In 1965, a public school district in Iowa suspended
three teenagers for wearing black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War.
Their families sued the school system, and in 1969 the case reached the Supreme
Court. The Court ruled that the school district had violated the students’ free
speech rights. The armbands were a form of symbolic speech, which the 1st
Amendment protects.
○ Outcome: Students have free speech and symbolic speech is a form of protected
speech
■ Protected speech - symbolic speech (wearing black armband), hate speech
(burning US flag)
■ There are limits, but the Constitution/Bill of Rights/1st Amendment does
not address them, covered via SCOTUS cases such as ...
○ Schenck v. United States (1919) - During World War I, socialist antiwar activists
Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer mailed 15,000 fliers urging men to resist the
military draft claiming that it violated the 13th amendment. They were arrested
under the Espionage Act of 1917, which banned interference with military
operations or supporting US enemies during wartime. They appealed to the
Supreme Court on the grounds that the conviction violated their free speech
rights. The resulting Supreme Court case concerned whether the Espionage Act
violated freedom of speech. The Court upheld the Espionage Act, ruling that the
speech creating a “clear and present danger” like shouting fire in a crowded
theater was not protected by the 1st Amendment.
○ Outcome: Speech can be limited if you create a “clear and present danger”; there
are time, place, and manner restrictions on speech
■ To determine time, place, and manner:
● The regulation must be content neutral.
● It must be narrowly tailored to serve a significant governmental
interest.
● It must leave open ample alternative channels for communicating
the speaker’s message.
■ Unprotected speech
● Defamation - damaging someone’s reputation by making false
statements
○ libel - written lies
○ slander - spoken lies
● Obscene - Miller Test applies (The average person finds it obscene,
it offensively depicts sexual content, it lacks serious literary,
artistic, political or scientific value)
● Speech intended to incite “imminent illegal action” and “likely to
produce such a result”
○ Gitlow v. New York (1925)
■ Gitlow, a socialist, distributed a “Left Wing Manifesto" that called for
overthrow of government by force. New York convicted him but he argued
that he was protected under the 1st Amendment’s freedom of speech
clause. The Supreme Court ruled that the 1st amendment does not prevent
a state from punishing political speech that directly advocates for violent
government overthrow and Gitlow was guilty.
● Freedom of Press
○ New York Times Company v. United States (1971) - In 1971, the United States
government under President Richard Nixon attempted to restrain the New York
Times and the Washington Post from publishing excerpts from the Pentagon
Papers, a top-secret history of US military action in Vietnam, based on national
security concerns. In the resulting case, the Supreme Court ruled that the
government’s attempt to bar publication of the Pentagon Papers violated the 1st
Amendment right to freedom of the press, and that publishing a history of the war
did not pose an immediate national security threat to American military forces.
○ Due to freedom of press, there is a heavy presumption against government claims
of prior restraint (censorship), which means that it is very difficult for the
government to prove that they’re right in limiting freedom of the press; in this
case the government could not block publication of the Pentagon Papers
2nd Amendment:
● U.S. v. Miller (1939) - A federal law prohibited sawed-off shotguns, and the Supreme
Court ruled that this did not violate the 2nd Amendment because possession of a
sawed-off shotgun is not used to maintain a well-regulated militia but instead used to
commit crimes.
● D.C. v. Heller (2008) - The District of Columbia banned guns, and the Supreme Court
determined that this violated the Constitution and law abiding citizens are entitled to their
guns.
● McDonald v. Chicago (2010) selective incorporation case - The first case in which the
Second Amendment right to “keep and bear Arms” was incorporated to the states. The
City of Chicago passed a handgun ban in 1982; Chicago resident Otis McDonald filed a
lawsuit challenging the ban in 2008 on the basis that he needed a handgun for
self-defense. The Court declared the handgun ban unconstitutional by a 5-4 majority,
ruling that the Second Amendment right to bear arms for self-defence is fundamental, and
therefore incorporated to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process
clause.
14th Amendment:
● Due process clause - prohibits STATES taking of life, liberty, or property except as
authorized by law
● Selective incorporation
○ Occurs mainly through the due process clause
○ The Bill of Rights is applicable to the states
○ Liberties in the Bill of Rights cannot be taken away by the state or federal
government
○ Bill of Rights has been applied to states on a case-by-case basis
■ McDonald v. Chicago (2010)
■ Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
● Equal Protection clause - prohibits states from denying equal protection under the law
6th Amendment:
● Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) selective incorporation case - In 1961, a Florida court
refused to provide a public defender for Clarence Earl Gideon, who was accused of
robbing a pool bank. In jail, Gideon appealed his conviction to the US Supreme Court on
the grounds that the Fourteenth Amendment incorporated the Sixth Amendment’s right to
counsel to the states. The Supreme Court ruled in Gideon’s favor, requiring states to
provide a lawyer to any defendant who could not afford one, thus incorporating the 6th
amendment’s right to counsel to the states.
8th Amendment:
● The death penalty is constitutional, but there are some limits (e.x. Minors and mentally
deficient personas cannot receive death penalty)
4th Amendment:
● Exclusionary Rule - evidence illegally seized by law enforcement officers in violation of
the 4th Amendment cannot be used against the suspect in criminal prosecution
○ Mapp v. Ohio (1961) - Mapp was convicted of possessing obscene material, the
Court determined that this evidence could not be used because it was taken
through an illegal search of her home; incorporated 4th amendment
● Pretrial rights of the accused and the ban of unreasonable searches and seizures are
intended to ensure that citizen liberties are not eclipsed by the need for social order and
security, including:
○ Protects against warrantless searches of cell phone data
○ Limitations placed on government bulk collection of telecommunication metadata
● Patriot Act (2001) - post 9/11, the government secretly (and illegally - without a
warrant) acquired and examined cell phone data
● USA Freedom Act (2015) - Limitations placed on bulk collection of telecommunication
metadata (cell phone communication info but not the actual communication)
Civil Rights:
● Rights of individuals against discrimination based on race, national origin, religion, sex,
ability, sexual orientation, age, or pregnancy.
○ The Equal Protection clause of the 14th amendment was the basis for social
movements like the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s, the women’s
rights movement, and the LGBTQ rights movement.
● Reconstruction Amendments:
○ 13th - Abolition of Slavery (1865)
○ 14th - Citizenship Rights and Due Process/Equal Protection (1868)
○ 15th - Right to Vote not Denied by Race (1870)
● Letter from Birmingham Jail
○ Demand fulfillment for African-Americans of the ideals of the Declaration of
Independence and the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause
○ “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”
○ 4 steps of any nonviolent campaign:
■ Collection of the facts to determine whether injustices are alive
■ Negotiation
■ Self-purification
■ Direct Action
● Civil Rights Act of 1964
○ Banned discrimination based on race, color, religion, geneder, or national origin,
and now has been extended to sex, in public accommodations or employment
○ It created the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to ensure fair
hiring practices
● Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Allowed Congress and the federal government to oversee
state elections in Southern States
○ Banned literacy tests or other obstacles to vote
○ + 24th amendment which banned the poll tax
○ Required states with a history of voter discrimination to obtain federal approval
for changes to election laws and policies (preclearance)
○ Increase in minority voter turnout
● Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)- In 1892, Homer Plessy entered a whites only railcar and was
7/8 white but technically black, he was asked to leave and refused, Supreme Court ruled
that separate but equal provisions were adequate and do not violate the Equal Protection
Clause of the 14th Amendment
● Brown v. Board of Education (1954) - Oliver Brown was the father of Linda, an African
American third grader who was forced to attend a segregated elementary school. Along
with other African American families in the area, Brown sued the Board of Education of
Topeka, Kansas. Under the leadership of future Supreme Court justice Thurgood
Marshall, the NAACP’s Legal Defense Fund sought to prove with this case that
segregated public schools violated the Fourteenth Amendment’s equal protection clause.
In its decision, the Supreme Court agreed, ruling that “in the field of public education,
separate but equal has no place.” This ruling was a crucial victory for the civil rights
movement, and later cases challenging segregation built on the precedent set in Brown.
● Majority-Minority districts
○ Voting districts in which a minority group makes up a majority
■ Thornburg v. Gingles (1982) - in favor
■ Shaw v. Reno (1993) - against
■ Cooper v. Harris (2017) - against
● Women’s Rights Movement
○ National Organization for Women (NOW) led the womens’ rights movement in
the 1960s and 1970s
■ The Equal Pay Act of 1963 promised equal pay for equal work
■ Civil Rights Act of 1964
○ Title 9 of the Educational Amendments Act of 1972
■ Prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex from any federally funded
educaiton program and allocated more money for female sports
○ The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 bolstered worker protections against pay
discrimination
Affirmative Action:
● Preferential admissions and hiring policies for minorities; allowed but no quota system;
no points for awarded for race
● University of California v. Bakke
○ Race can be a factor in college admissions, but you can’t have quotas (I need X
amount of ___, Y amount of ___, Z amount of ___)
Unit 4: American political ideologies and belief
Political socialization
● Demographic characteristics are socioeconomic characteristics of a population,
including age, race, gender, religion, marital status, occupation, education level, and
more. These characteristics influence how individuals tend to vote and whether they
identify with a political party.
● Globalization is the growth of an interconnected world economy and culture, fueled by
lowered trade barriers between nations and advances in communications technology.
Globalization has influenced American politics by increasing the extent to which the
United States influences, and is influenced by, the values of other countries.
● Political socialization is the process by which a person develops political values and
beliefs, including through interactions with family, friends, school, religious and civic
groups, and the media.
● Characteristics indicative of the Democratic party are: women, low-income, single,
divorced, or widowed, blue-collar, Blacks or Hispanics, Jews or those unaffiliated with a
religion, Northerners and Westerners, younger and older Americans, union members,
Democratic parents
● Characteristics indicative of the Republican party are: men, high-income, married, white
collar workers or housewives, whites, Protestants or Catholics, Midwesterners or
Southerners, middle-aged Americans, non-union members, Republican parents
Changes in ideology
● Generational effects are experiences shared by a group of people who came of age
together (generational cohorts, such as baby boomers or millennials) that affect their
political attitudes; wars and economic recessions that hit one generation particularly hard
have lasting effects on the political attitudes of that generation as its members progress
through life.
○ Those who came of age during the Great Depression and New Deal policies are
still Democratic.
● Lifecycle effects are changes over the course of an individual’s lifetime, which affect
their political attitudes and participation; as individuals develop from young people to
adults to senior citizens, their concerns and values change.
○ Younger Americans tend to be more liberal but less politically active than older
Americans.
● Period effects are major events and social trends that affect the political attitudes of the
entire population; for example, the terrorist attacks on September 11 and the Watergate
scandal had lasting effects on the political attitudes of those who lived through them.
Voter turnout
● Compulsory voting laws require citizens to register and vote in local and national
elections.
● Midterm elections are the congressional elections that occur in even-numbered years
between presidential elections, in the middle of each presidential term.
● Political efficacy is a citizen’s belief that their vote matters and can influence government
policies.
● Presidential elections take place every four years and determine the president and
vice-president.
● Voter registration is a requirement that eligible voters enroll on an electoral roll before
they can vote.
● Voter turnout is the number of registered voters who vote in an election.
● Demographics are characteristics of a population, like age, race, and education. Political
scientists use demographic information to study changes in the makeup of a population.
● State laws influence voter turnout. Policies making it more difficult to vote (requiring
voter IDs) decrease turnout and policies making it easier to vote (allowing early voting or
election-day registration) increase turnout.
● The demographic characteristics of a voting population help predict voter turnout rates in
an election.
○ Associated with varying levels of political engagement and political efficacy
● Many factors such as person demographics, political ideology and party identification,
characteristics of the candidates, and contemporary political issues influence voter choice.
Political parties
● Linkage institutions are groups in society that connect people to the government and
facilitate turning the people’s concerns into political issues on the government’s policy
agenda such as the media, interest groups, political parties, and elections.
● A political party is an organization of people with similar political ideologies that seeks
to influence public policy by getting its candidates elected.
○ The party organization is the structure of national, state, and local parties that
creates a platform, recruits candidates, manages candidates’ campaigns by
providing a fundraising and media strategy, and educates and mobilizes voters.
○ The party in government consists of the party’s elected officials who propose,
debate, vote on, and sign legislation that meets the party’s platform goals.
○ The party in the electorate is composed of all citizens who identify with that
party; it mobilizes voter turnout and donates to candidate’s campaigns.
● A party platform is a list of goals outlining a party’s positions on issues and political
priorities.
Third-party politics
● An independent candidate is a candidate for office who does not have a formal
affiliation with a political party.
● A party platform is a set of goals supported by a political party. Parties design their
platforms to appeal to the concerns of the public and to encourage voters to support the
party.
● A proportional system is an electoral system in which legislative seats are awarded in
proportion to the percentage of votes garnered by a party in an election. This system is
common in Europe and benefits minor political parties, who may win a small number of
legislative seats even if a mainstream party wins most seats.
● A third party, also called a minor party, is a US political party other than the two major
parties (the Republican Party and the Democratic Party). Third parties rarely win
elections in the United States, but frequently influence national politics by drawing
attention to issues previously neglected by the major parties.
● A two-party system is an electoral system in which two major parties dominate voting at
all levels of government.
● A winner-takes-all system is an electoral system in which legislative seats are awarded
only to the party who received the most votes in an election. This is the most common
system in the United States, and it does not benefit minor political parties, since
third-party candidates rarely win the majority of votes in an election.
● Barriers to third-party success are that most US elections operate by the winner-takes-all
system and third-party ideas are often incorporated into the platforms of the two major
parties.
Electing a president
● A caucus is a meeting in a voting precinct at which party members choose nominees for
political office after hours of speeches and debates; caucuses tend to promote the views of
dedicated party members since participating requires a large time commitment.
● A closed primary is a primary election limited to registered members of a political party;
for example, in a state with closed primaries, only registered Democrats can vote in the
Democratic primary to choose candidates for local, state, and national office.
● An open primary is a primary election that is not limited to registered party members.
For example, in a state with open primaries, independent voters or Republicans can vote
in the Democratic primary to choose candidates for local, state, and national office.
● The Electoral College is the group of electors chosen by each state to formally vote for
the next U.S. president based on the result of voting in the state.
● A general election is an election that decides which candidate will fill an elective.
● An incumbency advantage is the tendency of incumbents (officials already holding a
political office) to win reelection; incumbents have advantages in media exposure,
fundraising, and staff.
● A party convention is a meeting of delegates from one political party to vote on policy
and select party candidates for public office.
● The popular vote is the total or percentage of votes won by each candidate.
● A primary election is an election that decides which candidate a party will send on to a
general election; primary elections pit candidates from the same party against one
another.
● Winner-takes-all is an electoral system in which the candidate with the most votes is
elected or, in the case of the U.S. Electoral College, gains all the votes of a state or
district’s electors.
● Presidential election timeline for modern elections
○ The spring/summer before the election year, the most serious candidates declare
their intention to run for president.
○ January-June of the election year, states hold primaries and caucuses to vote for
party nominees.
○ Summer of the election year, parties hold national conventions to formally
nominate their presidential and vice presidential candidates, choosing those with
the most votes from state primaries/caucuses.
○ November of the election year, the presidential election takes place on the
Tuesday following the first Monday in november.
○ December of the election year, the Electoral College takes place and the president
and vice president are formally elected.
Congressional elections
● A midterm election is an election that takes place in the middle of a presidential term.
Midterm elections tend to have much lower voter turnout than presidential elections and
often result in the loss of congressional seats for the president’s party.
● A presidential election is an election where candidates vie for the office of President of
the United States. Held every four years, presidential elections tend to have a much
higher voter turnout than midterm elections.
● A primary election is an election that decides which candidate a party will send on to a
general election; primary elections pit candidates from the same party against one
another.
Modern campaigns
● Campaign finance is the fundraising to support a candidate to run for political office.
● Political consultants are people who promote the election of candidates for political
office by helping advise them on how to best present their ideas to the public.
● Since the 1976 election, both Republicans and Democrats have used state primaries to
select presidential candidates, which resulted in the presidential election cycle becoming
longer.
● Social media has become a hugely important medium for expressing campaign goals,
mobilizing voters, and fundraising. Social media allows candidates to community directly
with voters. It also exables campaigns to micro-target voters with more individualized
messages.
Campaign finance
● The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 banned soft money and reduced attack
ads.
● “Stand by Your Ad” provision was part of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of
2002 and required ads used to support or oppose a candidate to include this line: “I’m
[candidate’s name] and I approve this message.”
● Soft money is money spent in support of a candidate without directly donating to their
campaign, such as paying for ads or campaign events, or giving to the candidate’s party.
● Hard money is cash contributed directly to a political candidate that may only come
from a PAC and follow rules set by the FEC.
● A political action committee (PAC) is an organization, usually representing an interest
group or corporation, that raises money with the goal of supporting or defeating
candidates, parties, or legislation. There are limits to the amount of money a PAC can
donate to a candidate or party in each election.
○ While individuals may only contribute $2,700 directly to a candidate, they can
contribute up to $5,000 per PAC and give to as many PACs as they want.
● A super PAC may raise unlimited funds in support of a candidate or party as long as they
do not coordinate in any way with the candidate or party or donate directly to the
candidate.
● Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (2010) - A Supreme Court case which
ruled that political spending by corporations, associations, and labor unions is a form of
protected speech under the First Amendment. The Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens
United and similar cases have reduced the limits on campaign contributions, encouraged
the creation of Super PACs, and increased debate over the role money can and should
play in elections.
● The Federal Elections Commission was created in 1974 to regulate money in elections.
The media
● “Horse race” journalism focuses on who is winning or ahead in the polls rather than on
candidates’ policy agenda or debates.
● Investigative journalism is deep, original investigation on a specific topic, often
conducted over a long period of time and sometimes involving the exposure of secret
information.
● Linkage institutions are groups that connect citizens to the government and facilitate
turning popular concerns into issues on the government’s policy agenda.
● “Media as a gatekeeper” indicates the media’s role in setting the political agenda by
drawing public and government attention to certain issues.
Changing media
● Agenda-setting is the way the media influences what issues the public considers
important enough to address through the government.
● A citizen journalist is a person who reports on current events who is not trained in
journalism or affiliated with a news outlet. Social media and smartphones have facilitated
the rise of citizen journalists.
● Framing is the way the media defines and portrays an issue, which affects public
perception of that issue.
● Ideologically-oriented programming is TV and radio news programs that cater to
audiences with a particular ideological perspective.
● Media consolidation is the process by which a few large companies have acquired the
majority of news sources in the United States. Today, six companies (CBS, Comcast,
Disney, News Corporation, Time Warner, and Viacom) control 90% of American media
outlets.
● Partisan new sites are websites and blogs that cater to audiences with a particular
ideological perspective.
● American media is more diverse than ever because anyone can access and employ it, but
it is becoming more elitist than ever because a handful of media giants own nearly
everything, diminishing the range of opinions, and Americans can turn toward partisan
new sites that reaffirm people’s views. Negative impacts of these dynamics include false
information spread by citizen journalists and large corporations focusing on money over
content.