0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views2 pages

Linear Algebra Problem Set 2 - 2026

This document outlines Problem Set 2 for a Linear Algebra course, detailing the timeline for assignment releases, punctuality expectations, and resources allowed for completion. It includes a series of mathematical problems related to matrix theory, including concepts of invertibility, row operations, and solving linear equations. The assignment is due on January 20, 2026, at 8 PM, and emphasizes the importance of understanding the solutions submitted.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views2 pages

Linear Algebra Problem Set 2 - 2026

This document outlines Problem Set 2 for a Linear Algebra course, detailing the timeline for assignment releases, punctuality expectations, and resources allowed for completion. It includes a series of mathematical problems related to matrix theory, including concepts of invertibility, row operations, and solving linear equations. The assignment is due on January 20, 2026, at 8 PM, and emphasizes the importance of understanding the solutions submitted.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Linear Algebra—Winter/Spring 2026

Instructors: A.S. Arora, S. Das, G. Kurri


Problem Set 2
Due: 8 PM, Tuesday January 20, 2026

Instructions
a. Timeline. The first “half” of a problem set will be released by Tuesday nights (or
whenever the first lecture of the week takes place). The full problem set will be
released Friday nights (or whenever the second lecture of the week takes place). The
full assignment will, typically, be due on Tuesday nights, 8 PM.
b. Punctuality. Aim to get the assignment done three days prior to the deadline. We will
not be able to entertain any requests for extensions. If you seek clarification from us
and we do not respond on time, do the following: (a) assume whatever seems most
reasonable, and solve the question under that assumption and (b) ensure you have
evidence for making the clarification request and report the incident to one of the PhD
TAs.
c. Resources. Feel free to use any resource you like (including generative AI tools) to get
help but please make sure you understand what you finally write and submit. The
TAs may ask you to explain the reasoning behind your response if something appears
suspicious.
d. Graded vs Practice Questions. Problems numbered using Arabic numerals (i.e. 1, 2, 3, . . . )
constitute assignment problems that will be graded. Problems numbered using Roman
numerals (i.e. i,ii,iii,. . . ) are practice problems that will not be graded.

In the following, assume the field (when unspecified) is any subfield of the complex field.
1. Let A be an n × n matrix. Can it be the case that there exist two distinct matrices B
and B ′ such that both B and B ′ are left inverses of A, i.e. BA = B ′ A = I? If so, give
an example. Otherwise, prove that this is impossible.
i. How was an elementary matrix defined? Is it related to an elementary row operation?
ii. Show that every elementary matrix can be inverted.
iii. Show that every matrix A can be written as A = P R where R is in the row-reduced
echelon form and P is an invertible matrix.
iv. Let R be the row-reduced echelon matrix, row-equivalent to a square matrix A. Is the
following true (and if so, give a proof; otherwise give a counter-example): If the last
row of R is not all-zeros, then R is the identity matrix.
2. What is the augmented matrix A′ corresponding to the system AX = Y ? Use Examples
15 and 16 in the textbook to explain how using A′ one might obtain A−1 (when A is
invertible) via two different routes.
v. Let P be the product of elementary matrices that maps A to the row-reduced echelon
matrix R. If A is invertible, show that A−1 = P .
vi. Let A be an n × n matrix. Show that the following two statements are equivalent: (i)
A is row equivalent to the n × n identity matrix and (ii) AX = 0 has only the trivial
solution (i.e. the only solution is X = 0).
3. Describe a general procedure (at a high level) for solving a system of non-homogeneous
linear equations AX = Y and illustrate this procedure by finding an expression for X
(in terms of A and Y ) where  
0 5 −1
A := 1 8 −1 .
2 1 1

4. Let A be an n × n matrix. Show that the following statements are equivalent: (i) A
is invertible, and (ii) the system of equations AX = Y has a solution for each n × 1
column matrix Y .
5. Consider n × n matrices, A, A1 . . . Ak satisfying A = A1 A2 . . . Ak . Show that if A is
invertible, then for each j, Aj is also invertible.
6. Prove the following corollary after Theorem 12 in the textbook: If A is an invertible
n × n matrix and if a sequence of elementary row operations reduces A to the identity,
then that same sequence of operations when applied to I yields A−1 .
7. Suppose A has a left inverse. Show that AX = 0 has only the trivial solution.
8. Let A be an m × n matrix over a field F , and let u1 , u2 , . . . , ur denote the non-zero
row vectors in the row-reduced echelon form of A. Determine whether the following
statement is true or false.
r
P
For scalars c1 , . . . , cr ∈ F , if ci ui = 0, then ci = 0 for all i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , r}.
i=1

You might also like