0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views4 pages

Reflection Grading Criteria Guide

The document outlines a reflection assessment rubric with criteria for evaluating depth of reflection, completeness, quality of work, and content organization, each rated on a scale from 1 to 4. It specifies the expectations for exemplary, satisfactory, developing, and beginning levels of performance. The total possible score for the reflection is 20 points.

Uploaded by

chanelle.cai
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views4 pages

Reflection Grading Criteria Guide

The document outlines a reflection assessment rubric with criteria for evaluating depth of reflection, completeness, quality of work, and content organization, each rated on a scale from 1 to 4. It specifies the expectations for exemplary, satisfactory, developing, and beginning levels of performance. The total possible score for the reflection is 20 points.

Uploaded by

chanelle.cai
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

REFLECTION

Criteria Ratings Points

4 3 2 1

Exemplary Satisfactory Developing Beginning

Depth of The student The student The student demonstrates The student 8 Points
Reflection demonstrates an in- demonstrates a a minimal reflection on, demonstrates a lack
depth reflection on, general reflection and personalization of, the of reflection on, or
(x2)
and personalization on, and theories, concepts, and/or personalization of, the
of, the theories, personalization of, strategies presented in the theories, concepts,
concepts, and/or the theories, course materials to date. and/or strategies
strategies presented concepts, and/or presented in the
in the course strategies presented course materials to
materials to date. in the course Viewpoints and date.
materials to date. interpretations are
unsupported or supported
Viewpoints and with flawed arguments. Viewpoints and
interpretations are Viewpoints and Examples, when interpretations are
insightful and well interpretations are applicable, are not missing,
supported. Clear, supported. provided or are irrelevant inappropriate, and/or
detailed examples are Appropriate to the assignment. unsupported.
provided, as examples are Examples, when
applicable. provided, as applicable, are not
applicable. provided.
Completeness Output includes all Output includes all Output is missing some Output excludes 4 Points
of Output components and components and components and/or does essential
meets or exceeds all meets all not fully meet the components and/or
requirements requirements requirements indicated in does not address the
indicated in the indicated in the the [Link] requirements
instructions. Each instructions. Each questions or parts of the indicated in the
question or part of the question or part of assignment are not instructions. Many
assignment is the assignment is addressed. Some parts of the
addressed thoroughly. adequately attachments and assignment are
All attachments and addressed. All additional documents, if addressed minimally,
/or additional attachments and/or required, are missing or inadequately, and/or
documents are additional unsuitable for the purpose not at all.
included, as required. documents are of the assignment.
included, as
.
required.
.
Quality of The group exerted a The group is able to The group exerted effort The group displayed a 4 Points
Work great amount of exert effort, pride but displayed a lack of lack of effort,
effort, planning, and enthusiasm enthusiasm in producing enthusiasm,
enthusiasm, and towards the their output, as if coerced. planning, and pride
pride in producing production of the Output appears rushed towards the
and conceptualizing output. However, it and unpolished but does production of the
the output. Every contains some not distract from the output. Poor
detail of the output errors and/or objectives of the project. execution is very
was skillfully curated inconsistencies in evident and distracts
by the group. the output's from the objectives of
objectives, quality, the project.
or other details,
which may still be
refined.
Content All the ideas were Most of the ideas Some of the ideas were Most of the ideas 4 Points
Organization discussed coherently were discussed discussed coherently, but were not discussed
and could be coherently and could not be understood coherently and
understood easily. could be easily difficult to understand
understood.

TOTAL 20 points

You might also like