Decision Theory and Risk Analysis Guide
Decision Theory and Risk Analysis Guide
Jntnducticn
befnition
becision Theony
t is the shudy
Crguni2ation qents make clicices clen
Deusíen
hraty 6 <
is Skicntaitern
aties
tTCng A
Same Citeric becsSomeanorng
be becision
about
are
UnertaintyAubablihycndtheoy
tesion maximiaing
esçectedis ciion
docisicn
htenaas COmmon ien [Link]
deusicn atemative t cnteria. themakers
quantty
ntd shatagy fheccy
a
gui te potentd anises
onterts
ncus decision expeted deisicn
tbeie
shdegies oriodude:
unteria decison prui may
ohere
saisying censequenEs Kus
des infomation
complete
tack
cat lenten maker pan ublity
makersYaríous wncertobty
nbabilihes
to minimiing
certain
in índeciicsn
may choase t to
sion be chocsirg eir of
oshats doices atomes model
Aternatves a.
notchere 4Uncer
tanty
maximixs
act
heir he Deision
ansiders numeícalpr«{crenes
theoy based
Or hese have Aeng [Link]
mes becision
b CUtcmakers juncertainty
cuteemg
Many akisiong m chen
degsicoacions ublihy providesa fameucrk
naun
docipoblisnievcves
cmsn toced
cith makEr Hne valtuncbon
ue
availcublg decisions
kueioverat
r ecable
pieerenes
decisicn whwkan
tiny t GS
mut cach wlich SumEs
epede tiy dchcea o makers
mibple
dfferent
actcnsane e possibleass'repeanted
usuaiy
gns Kaat
kideasi
e cn peAe
decisien itenctves
unertainihy. ateratv maker [Link]
and
mmigi2es JteNínentsdeisico-
shrates
Moxinmox
oydes assecited Expeced 2ticn Ciganí maiinogent after Decisicn
beision detns
Cc
fronteLocrkfor megene
businas,
tincduding
fields
is
daisicn.
nrking censidenn a
peuides
risk- sJetinq
secking a mcknq
ihe
uslty
anti enhy
sudn
endussion
citn an LA)
maxlmum atcene, cip
ditferent impeuoq
prcELS and a
syslemabi
understand1g
Hhe ted Pgrmme,
cemputei
rarpenibe dtterent and
or
aiernatives coniderinqaverage i0 FsseuoiggS
o
solution
apprachecible pesrible alternaties (cmplex and ecnemie
rihud s,
otennes. er vigoreus
tat the reached and
payof
probabities cr
ophans unerain
multiple
decisicn
makers
cutcmes Jame ditferent RiUhostenity
invclves
outrcnnes cRiskand
baision n sk outomes
Deison happiness ublity1heis |Aecrding tecry
altern
ctive
rabond
hecny, ome invces
thay on ihiaticns
Theory
Cire the where cases,
is itubions qssociied eciion to
intuenceddeasion decision distingwstes Hne
widely deisíen ehere are
maker
mpeced
ct whi'e uhere
uncertanty
knceen
applied by te cf
Theony probabi ith
ldd
interacticns cthersand probabilihes nisk each ulity
in extend
lites dncese
3. oher
unertty reeg,a
Mne
bh è to cf paside
best cutcame. Expecded vae stateg
Problcm fonnton. lnvoles sdechinq the aternatie with tn
t is cnuaal step in decsion analyi highet apeácd valie
and invchves stuconng he decisicn prblem, b Considers both he probabilihes ond paues
payctts
deñninq ckjectives, identiging alkerncthives? aseiatedith duferent tudcemer
understandgg he dsip bin diterent clemerts Maxí mum sbatgy
Jntuence diagam, payctf iables aad the Jnyoives seecing tne alternatve thdt merimí2es
deisicn tees are tocls used in probiem Ahe minímym pasible payott
fomdtien. te represent Cn anyaed deusico |k fs a nisk -Averse apooach
Piublem Minimax Appyect Reqret sheteay
diagiam volves sucing tne aiteYncive tiad mioimies
Intuene diagram sually representa fhe he maximum regret chere regret is Hhe
difference btn the best pasribe outome and
Hetuip and dependenies amang van'eus the actuad outtom e
lemcnts n deis ion Prblem.
cropcrcnta intuence dicgrem Heuristics
DDeaision rode: aresimple practica nies er strategies
Kepresent deision pcints ohere decsion madeers Hhad inividuads use to make decisiens quidely
cCese aneng different cterntive s and wih less cagnitve efort
) Chance rode. Sabsfiung
Fopiesent uncertin foctos thet t s a decision strateqy chee the decwon
ioiuencE PUtome. maker seek a scluton Hhat mecb a satsactry
Ct
ly Tre decisicn
beisier
SCCnant D
clearty Beneh Decision osts
Htemohies
The
reptesentingrepresenting Concider
naie Of
alterntives
belay Prceed payc#
altctnatve in Suows ot
companng a
ent Dayalt preiet deble "Predprjecd
he
Table cemplehicn miqut mangement
consequences
icn and
otPoyf cr
Ccast Ccost) oftPay indude time"Ddlay"
On
slecbing Nceture
tates q time
em1
and vadue or
and dewtcih
decisicn
the ditterent icn
last) Ccast) belqyc asaiated "belagt state
dtng bet
Chance
Dode teimigl
briraomen On tbime Catl paic)
fnhdec r *Proend
implics its con cer ned belagnd Ccetpyet)
1 Cn tine
ith peeas maing decisien [Link] extensio Lbeay Termind node Ccei onyi )
to stahahca theony índudes ceisien thecy degsion ->
Delayed Ciatl pagert)
node Ghane
|mahips in he presence oF stotihal knaoledae hode
which purides into uhere there
table.i9 ccton ,
Medscte
|000
Krleosn
Its monitig
gain he sttes Heche
he Hoceerinfomctíc
by
fom nature
AatsPayofs
PaycA cnd eshitertSUrey n
ich stimate he
Puy
ë or
(an
foleoring matn'x rom f. by doas
nature.
and reason
be kncunCs
diferent Iiber guess
Probab not
ned heanangemEnu.
Can be
usttion. ccoffk
andact islass Or hese have
stetes he
acreper mtnxpayoft from
perfee
fom understeoe or
ats
diteren
e
market
ncture bition
con
rops
before monston
s not Passible
teaveu oill rain hecvilu or nt
om pat
Example
Kuppore manafucturer of buclkets "t Rs-go per can ct mou make
nchction, wat
bucket and eanc Rs.a per buck et He con. yell looc run aod probabihes for dirent hakes
buet dqy he dei ion m makes eshimate a
On he cther hand, s he pruducer a supenor
Gucality packet sel at tORs
and
fom his pat exerene
eadh ha Qam R4 per btket hd he ohers oy by saetific metiods . hus
Can sel ony 6o0 pkb a suerior qualihy iho probcbilifies cf ditkrent atde
We have doade knoo te ypo a t
ratyre qre cnly ashimater.
manufrcturer ldd o due
for
becistor
of
to act
friruple
pesimiahu
Pnnipledeien maling. af
decision
be
act n
ax-mn lo
Rgarded mininam pbm mak'ng undestudiodmaling
tecrvds
pprnci iste diterentstat ew
when uncitainity
hnciple under under
pauct pr
art Q
nct heod
breup.
deided. The
value s Hne best Aot according to
Maxi-max principle