Instructional Research & Practice Guide
Instructional Research & Practice Guide
SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL COMMUNICATION & TECHNOLOGY
CBC FRAMEWORK FOR CURRICULUM REVIEW FOR CORE UNITS
AUGUST 2020
MODULE DEVELOPERS
Dr. Florence Nyamu (Coordinator)
Dr. Marguerite O’Connor
Prof. Samson Ondigi
Dr. Michael Waititu
Dr. Gichuhi Waweru
Dr. Mary Nasibi
1 COURSE DESCRIPTION...................................................................................................................4
2 COURSE OUTLINE...........................................................................................................................7
CHAPTER 1: TEACHER AS RESEARCHER AND THE REFLECTIVE TEACHER...............................................8
1.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................8
2.1 Lesson learning outcomes.....................................................................................................8
2.2 The concept of the teacher researcher..................................................................................8
2.3 Importance of a teacher researcher....................................................................................10
2.4 Qualities of a teacher researcher.........................................................................................11
2.5 The concept of a reflective teacher.....................................................................................13
Chapter 2: Approaches of teacher research........................................................................................17
2.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................17
2.2 Lesson Learning Outcomes......................................................................................................17
2.3 Approaches to Teacher Research..............................................................................................17
2.4 Action Research.........................................................................................................................18
2.4.1 Methods of Action Research................................................................................................19
2.5 Lesson Study............................................................................................................................22
2.6 Assessment Questions..............................................................................................................25
2.7 Further Reading.........................................................................................................................26
CHAPTER 3: Principles and Methods of Instructional Research and the Research Process, Collecting
and Analyzing Data..............................................................................................................................28
3.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................................28
3.2 Learning Outcomes/Objectives..................................................................................................28
Chapter 4: Bridging instructional research and practice......................................................................38
4.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................38
4.2 Learning outcomes..............................................................................................................38
CHAPTER 5: Principles of collaborative and multidisciplinary research in instructional research........43
5.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................43
5.2 Learning outcomes..............................................................................................................43
5.3 Definitions of collaborative and multidisciplinary research.................................................44
5.4 Principles of collaborative and multidisciplinary research.........................................................47
5.5 Examples of collaborative and multidisciplinary research.........................................................49
5.6 Benefits of collaborative and multidisciplinary research...........................................................51
Title of course:
Unit Code: ECT 340
Unit Name: Instructional Research and Practice
Contact Hours: 35
Pre-requisites: ECT 339
By the end of the course, the teacher trainee should be able to:
Course Content
Concepts of the teacher as a researcher and reflective teacher. Categories of Action research
(classroom; positivist, interpretive and critical). Principles and methods of research and the
Research Process. Bridging research and practice - Characteristics of a research problem.
Action research methodology: Principles of collaborative and multi-disciplinary research.
Classroom research across learning areas- ways to identify problems to investigate and
selection of appropriate research methods. Application of research in instruction (for
evidence-based teaching methodology). Proposal & Report writing principles - Collecting
and analysing data. Report writing. Drawing conclusions from research, Publishing and
Dissemination of action research.
Modes of Delivery
a. Library research, Case studies,, Group discussion - small group activities, Lecturer
consultations
b. Seminar ppresentations, Individual and or group research projects, Problem Solving,
Inquiry, Reflective Discussion, Online – asynchronous learning
Computer Laboratories, Computers, Online resources, research books, Thesis and journals,
Library
a. Formative 40%
b. Summative 60%
c. Pass Mark: 50% (Aggregate)
Text Books
ii. Feldman, A., Altrichter, H., Posch, P., Somekh, B., (2018) Teachers investigate their
work: An introduction to Action Research, Routledge
iii. Kervin, L et al (2016) Research for Educators, Cengage, South Melbourne, 2016 2nd
edition
iv. Wilson, E. (Ed) (2013) School-based Research: a guide for education students. Sage
Publications, University of Cambridge
Journals
e-Materials
Textbooks
ii. Barak Rosenshine 2012 Principles of Instruction: Research Based Strategies That
ALL Teachers should know. American Educator Journal 2012
iv. Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2000). Research Methods in Education,
London, Routledge Falmer.
vi. Grellier, J. & Goerke, V (2018) Communications toolkit (4th Edition), Cengage
Learning Australia, South Melbourne, Victoria
vii. Mills G. E., (2003). Action Research: A guide for the teacher researcher. 2nd Ed.
Merill Prentice Hall: Columbus.
Journals
e-Materials
i. [Link]
ii. Research gate [Link]
iii. Khan academy [Link]
1.1 Introduction
This first lesson focuses on the meaning of concepts at the core of the course namely; teacher
researcher and the reflective teacher. Its importance lies in establishing the foundation for the
place of research in teaching and learning; and the undisputed role of the teacher as a
researcher. The lesson will also look at the importance of the teacher researcher and what
qualities one should strive to have to effectively fulfill this role. The last sub-theme will be on
the meaning of a reflective teacher and what reflective teaching entails.
A teacher research therefore refers to research carried out by the teachers among their
students and in the classroom as they carry out their duties. It is about their teachings, how
schools are administered and even the attitude of students towards learning and teaching and
eventually how the learning environments can be improved to enhance teaching and learning.
The person who does all these activities is known as a teacher researcher.
Numbering, 1.2.1
pacing and
sequencing
Title The concept of research and teacher researcher
Purpose The purpose of this e-tivity is to help you understand the meaning of research ,
teacher research and teacher researcher
Brief Watch videos1 and2 on these links on research and teacher researcher.
summary [Link] this video for the first 0.49mins on meaning of research:
overall task [Link]
[Link] the video for the first 2.46 minutes to understand more about a teacher as a
researcher: Https on Teacher research forms and possibilities.
Individual a) Based on the first and second videos explain why a teacher should not only be a
task teacher but also a researcher.?.Post your answer on Kusoma platform.
.
b) From the third video identify three things Lagerwaard says about the life of a
teacher [Link] this on the discussion forum.
Spark
Interaction a) Post on the discussion forum two themes that are common in the meaning of a
teacher researcher
b) Provide positive and constructive feedback on the explanation given by your
colleagues on the meaning of a teacher researcher and on individual tasks.
E-moderator 1,Ensure that learners are focused on the content and context of the discussion
interventions 2. Stimulate further learning and generation of new ideas
3. Provide feedback on the learning progress
[Link] the e-tivity
Schedule This task should take one hour.
and time
Numbering, 1.2.2
pacing and
sequencing
Title The importance of teacher researcher
Purpose The purpose of this e-tivity is to enable you to explain the importance of teacher
. research
Brief Watch videos1 and read pdf on these links.
summary
orall task [Link]://[Link]/watch?v=fykjs5482FA( watch for the first 2.47 mins).
2. [Link]
3. [Link]
resources/pubs/Value%20of%20Teacher%[Link] ( read the information on
page 4 on the value of teacher research)
Spark
Individual a) Using bullet points, outline the key themes in the importance of teacher
task researcher .
b) In a sentence explain what you understand by each [Link] of the points
Interaction a) Post two themes that are common in the importance of a teacher researcher.
b) Provide positive and constructive feedback on the explanation given on the
importance of a teacher researcher by your colleagues..
E-moderator 1,Ensure that learners are focused on the content and context of the discussion
interventions 2. Stimulate further learning and generation of new ideas
3. Provide feedback on the learning progress
[Link] the e-tivity
Schedule This task should take one hour.
and time
Next The characteristics of a teacher researcher
i. innovativeness
ii. Creativity
iii. Curiosity
iv. Resourcefulness
v. Open-mindedness
vi. Patience
vii. Inquisitive
Numbering, 1.2.3
pacing and
sequencing
Title The qualities of teacher researcher
Purpose The purpose of this e-tivity is to enable you to understand that a teacher researcher
need to strive to have certain characteristics or qualities to be effective in research.
Brief Watch videos1 and2 on these links.
summary
orall task [Link]://[Link]/watch?v=fykjs5482FA ( watch from 2.46 to 3.26mins
2. [Link]
Individual a) Explain why the qualities identified in the notes are important for the success of a
task teacher researcher. .
b) how do the qualities mentioned in the above links tie with the characters tics of a
teacher researcher.
Interaction a) Post two themes that are common in the characteristics of a teacher researcher.
b) Provide positive and constructive feedback on the explanation given by any of
your two collegues..
E-moderator 1,Ensure that learners are focused on the content and context of the discussion
interventions 2. Stimulate further learning and generation of new ideas
3. Provide feedback on the learning progress
[Link] the e-tivity
Schedule This task should take one hour.
and time
Next The concept of a reflective teacher
A reflective teacher therefore is one who thinks about his/her teaching along these lines.
According to Dewey (1933) in Nasibi (2003) ,she is one who develops a willingness to
Numbering 1.2.2
, pacing
and
sequencing
Title A reflective teaching and a reflective teacher
Purpose The purpose of this e-tivity is to enable you to understand better reflective teaching and th
meaning of a reflective teacher .
Brief [Link] the video on this link [Link] by [Link]
summary of
overall task 2. Watch the video on reflective teaching for the first 1.15 mins : [Link]
[Link] content at the attached link
content .[Link]
%20or%20improvement
Spark
by one of your colleague. How would you rate their answers on a scale of 10 :..
E- 1,Ensure that learners are focused on the content and context of the discussion
moderator 2. Stimulate further learning and generation of new ideas
interventio 3. Provide feedback on the learning progress
ns [Link] the e-tivity
Schedule This task should take one hour.
and time
Next The 2nd lesson
Questions
3. Explain how the identified four qualities of the teacher researcher help enhance his/her
work as a researcher?
4.’’ Most teachers in African schools operate as mere instructors, rigidly sure of their of their
facts, unwilling to tolerant critical questions, and highly authoritarian in their behaviour ‘’.
Discuss this statement in relation to the role of reflective teacher.
References
In the first lesson you learned about what teacher researcher is all about. In this lesson you will learn
about some strategies that teacher use for classroom research. You will be able to determine the
context in which these strategies can be effectively applied for your specific subject content area and
the unique learning environments. The purpose of this lesson is to help you begin to consider the
concept of classroom research as an important component of the practice of teaching
Teachers respond to students’ issues based on information gathered during lesson actualization.
Most of this information is given in student reports aimed at supporting learners make better
progress in the studies. Classroom based research tends to gather information on both teaching and
learning process. Beyond the student performance reports, there is need for teachers to share
evidence based data on student , content, learning environment using approaches that are not
intrusive.
There several approaches that teachers may take note of issues in the context of their own schools
and classrooms and then propose investigative methods appropriate to address the problems.
These approaches are used to systematically observe and analyze the results in the light of their
professional knowledge, and share the results with others, while enacting change in their own
classrooms. This is the teacher research , a school-based research that is carried out by teachers for
teachers and serves as an explicit and practical way of creating educational knowledge (Hargreaves,
1998), provide ongoing and meaningful opportunities for professional development, foster
advancement in their pedagogical expertise (Atay, 2008) and hence transform themselves into
researchers of their own practice. Teacher research is thus a means to facilitate this professional
growth of both pre-and in-service teachers, through the promotion of critical reflection, change and
reform in pedagogical strategies as well as school settings. Classroom research remains the most
powerful and applicable tool to examine and evaluate an issue or phenomenon in a systematic and
rigorous way
Strategies that are used by teachers to conduct research in the classroom and at school may vary
slightly in principle and practise but all aim at generating data to address issues encountered at the
classroom level. Some of these strategies include; Action Research, Practitioner Research,
Collaborative Inquiry, Critical Inquiry, Self-study, and Lesson Study. In this lesson we shall discuss
three strategies of Teacher Research (i) Action research and (ii) Lesson study
Teacher research is systematic and intentional inquiry about teaching and learning as well as
schooling that is carried out by teachers in their own school and classroom setting. Teacher research
helps to bridge the gulf between theory and practice, between research and implementation. It
enables the teachers to become active in the learning process. Through this type of research,
teachers acquire the skills of problematizing their seemingly good practices and ask questions about
their daily teaching routine. Such reflection is important in developing plans of actions to find
answers to the questions, make careful observations, draw conclusions from the evidence they
gather, and use what is learned to facilitate changes in their own pedagogy (Shakir-Costa & Haddad,
2009). Teacher research has also been shown to have positive effects on the professional
competence of teachers when it forms an integral part of the process of developing teaching as an
evidence-based profession. When teachers are reflective professionals they build theory from
practice making them in charge of their own practice
There are two categories of teacher research, one empirical—involving data collection and
interpretation, the other conceptual—involving analysis of ideas. The empirical Research may use
Journals, Oral Inquiries, and Classroom/School Studies. The Conceptual Research use essays.
a. Develop research questions based on their own curiosity about teaching and learning in
their classrooms.
b. Systematically collect data and research various methods of conducting research.
c. Analyze and interpret the data and the research methodology.
d. Write about their own research.
e. Share findings with students, colleagues, and members of the educational community.
f. Discuss with colleagues’ relationships among practice, theory, and their own research.
g. Examine their underlying assumptions about teaching and learning.
h. Assume responsibility for their own professional growth
In this lesson we shall discuss the two strategies (1) Action research and (2) Lesson study approach
Action research is popularly used to represent all forms of classroom research. This model uses an
approach in which the teacher alone or with others collaborate in the diagnosis of the problem and
in the development of a solution based on the diagnosis. In this approach, the action study assumes
classroom learning environment is part of the social world that is constantly changing and both the
researcher and research being one part of that change.
There are many methods to conducting action research. Some of the methods include:
Researchers can also use more than one of these methods to assist them in collecting rich and
meaningful data. While there are various methods to conducting action research, there are also
various types of action research in the fields of education, including individual action research,
collaborative action research and school-wide action research.
Action research can be used in many educational settings. It can be a reflexive critique, a process of
becoming aware of our own perceptual biases allowing for a dialectical critique, a way of
understanding the relationships between the elements that make up various phenomena in our
context. The collaborative characteristic is intended to mean that everyone’s view is taken as a
contribution to understanding the situation. Action research requires risking disturbance with the
understanding of our own taken for granted processess and willingness to submit them to critique.
Action research has three categories: (a) Positivist, (b) Interpretive and (c) Critical.
(a) The Positivist approach to action research, also known as classical action research perceives
research as a social experiment. Accordingly, action research is accepted as a method to test
hypotheses in a real world environment. The approach is based on the assumption of absolutism,
objectivism and determinism. The characteristics of positivism include the following: (a) science is
the only valid knowledge(b) Fact is the object of knowledge and (c) Philosophy does not possess a
method different from science. Settings used by these researchers vary but science remains the
main way to learn the truth. Only factual knowledge gained through observation (senses) including
measurement is trustworthy. In this research the role of researcher is limited to data collection and
interpretation in an objective way. In this study category, findings are usually observable and
quantifiable leading to statistical analysis. It has the ontological view of the world as comprising
discrete observable elements and events that interact in an observable determined and regular
manner and has no human interests within the study. Since only deductive approach is adopted, the
researcher need to concentrate on facts. The positivist research has the following five main
principles;
(1)There are no differences in the logic of inquiry across sciences (2) The research should aim to
explain and predict (3) Research should be empirically observable via human senses. (4) Inductive
reasoning should be used to develop statements ( hypothesis) to be tested during the research
process (5) Science is not the same as the common sense. The common sense should not be allowed
to bias the research findings. Science must be value free and it should be judged only buy logic
(b) Interpretive action research, also known as ‘contemporary action research’ perceives business
reality as socially constructed and focuses on specifications of local and organisational factors when
conducting the action research.
© Critical action research is a specific type of action research that adopts critical approach towards
business processes and aims for improvements.
Individual task [Link] key bullets indicate the action research steps that were used
by one teacher from this video
The terms action research, and practitioner inquiry (or practitioner research) are often used almost
interchangeably.
Action research in its strict sense thus refers to research activities that use a cyclical, action
reflection model to investigate and attempt to make change in an organization, for example, a whole
school. The term participatory action research emphasizes, within this action reflection cycle, the
involvement of those who, in other research methods, would be called research “subjects.” In
participatory action research, they are seen as co-researchers, participants in the conceptualization,
implementation, and interpretation of the research project as it unfolds.
To simplify, all action research conducted by practitioners can properly be termed teacher research,
but not all teacher research can properly be labelled action research. Here are three ways in which
teacher research can differ from action research:
Teacher research allows for but does not necessarily require a team element—one teacher can
conduct practitioner inquiry in his or her own classroom, for his or her own benefit.
Teacher research does not necessarily require a specific action or improvement as an outcome—it
can produce a change in a teacher’s perceptions, attitudes, or thinking that will eventually result in
particular changes, but the immediate result of a practitioner inquiry project need not be a set of
specific actions
Exemplary teachers want collaborative environments in which they can refine their craft within an
organized structure. Lesson study provides teachers with such a structure. Good teaching should
always analyze whether or not the lesson met its intended outcome to support this research should
occur in the trenches at the classroom level. This is where real-time data can be collected and
instructional impacts can be captured. Originated from Japan the practice of lesson study can
greatly impact education
Lesson study is a form of classroom inquiry in which several teachers collaboratively plan, teach,
observe, revise and share the results of a single class lesson. Teachers work through the steps listed
below. (To learn more about the process, Follow this link Lesson Study Guide.)
In a lesson study, teachers carefully explore how student learning, thinking and behavior change as a
result of the lesson. The practice of lesson study can lead to instructional improvement as teachers
become more knowledgeable about how their students learn and think and how instruction affects
student thinking. The following process is used
Develop Learning Goals: Team members articulate what they would like students to know and be
able to do as a result of the lesson.
Design the Lesson: The team designs a lesson to achieve the learning goals.
Plan the Study: The team decides how to observe and collect evidence of student learning.
Teach and Observe: One team member teaches the lesson while others observe and collect evidence
of student learning.
Analyze and Revise: The team discusses the results and assesses student progress toward learning
goals.
Document and Disseminate: The team documents the lesson study and shares their work with
colleagues
The lesson being called a ‘research lesson’ in part because it is the lesson and the learning
(not the teacher) that are subjected to systematic analysis by participants. The evaluation of
the lesson draws on the observations of pupil learning in order to revise the lesson for
teaching to a parallel group or prepare subsequent lessons. Typically, a Lesson Study cycle
will follow the stages presented in the figure 1 below.
Collecting data for improving learning is the general focus of classroom based research., in Lesson
study , the strategy differs from Action research in the process and focus. While issues may be the
focus of action research, Lesson study focuses on the learning process. Lesson study involves
backward design which starts with the clarification of the goal or endpoint of the learning process
and then the design of instructional experiences that lead to the goal. During the lesson design
phase teachers talk about how students are likely to respond to each element of the lesson. Besides
anticipating how students will interpret the subject matter, the kinds of difficulties learners may
experience and what kinds of experiences are likely to support their learning are also discussed. The
pervasive concern with student learning throughout lesson study distinguishes it from other types of
teaching improvement activities such as Action research. In lesson study, teachers:
base the lesson design on their ideas about how students learn
observe student learning when the lesson is taught
analyze observations of student learning after the lesson is taught, and
use information about student learning to revise the lesson.
Lesson study is a mirror of peer teaching activities that are practised in teacher education programs.
When carried out using scientific research approach it becomes a useful tool for;
Teaching Improvement. lesson study looks directly at one's classroom. Teachers focus on how their
students learn and what kinds of instructional activities support student learning and thinking. By
focusing on one lesson, instructors can learn about students, instruction, goals, and subject matter
without undertaking extensive course revision.
Instructional Materials: Lesson study results in a field tested lesson and materials that can be used
and adapted by other instructors. The systematic, evidence-based approach makes it possible for
teachers to build on one another's work. By the end of the lesson study process, teams produce
knowledge about how students learn from instruction.
Teaching Community: The Lesson study process helps build communities of practice around
teaching. Instructors report that collaborating with their peers is a particularly rewarding experience.
Lesson study cultivates mutual understanding of goals, teaching practices and student learning
among teachers.
Scholarly Inquiry: Lesson study is a form of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning—the final
products are suitable for professional presentations and publication. Lesson study integrates
teaching and research, theory and practice.
Spark
Individual task [Link] key bullets indicate the lesson study video and take note of the
process used. List the steps and determine the most important aspect of
lesson study
Make your observation from the video clip on introducing Lesson study
3. Which characteristic does not belong to the lesson study approach to teacher
research
Base the lesson design on their ideas about how students learn
Oobserve student learning when the lesson is taught
Analyze observations of student learning after the lesson is
taught,
Use information about student learning to revise the lesson
Use data to solve discipline issues in the school
Banford, H., Berkman, M., Chin, C., Cziko, C., Fecho, B., Jumpp, D., et al. (1996).
Cityscapes: Eight views from the urban classroom. Berkeley, CA: National Writing
Project.
Cerbin, B. (2011). Lesson study: Using classroom inquiry to improve teaching and learning in higher
education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
Cerbin, B. & Kopp, B. (2006). Lesson study as a model for building pedagogical knowledge and
improving teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 250-
257
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2009). Inquiry as stance: Practitioner research for the
next genera-tion. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hubbard, R. S., & Power, B. M. (1999).Living the questions: A guide for teacher
[Link], ME: Stenhouse.
Mohr, M., Rogers, C., Sanford, B., Nocerino, M., MacLean, M. S., & Clawson, S. (2004).
Teacher research for better schools. New York: Teachers College Press/National Writing
Project.
Teel, K. M., & Obidah, J. E. (Eds.). (2008). Building racial and cultural competence in the
class-room: Strategies from urban educators. New York: Teachers College Press.
Related Websites
3.1 Introduction
Instructional research will broadly follow the steps of any other research. Research is an in-depth
inquiry into a problem. It is systematic thereby seeking correlation of information thus and
ultimately leading to new knowledge. It is therefore important to consider some of the key points of
research but focus on instruction. Broadly it can be defined as the process of scientific inquiry to
solve the problems within the educational sector from policy to classroom practice.
Broadly there are two types of instructional research. These are qualitative and
quantitative research methods.
This is an open-ended approach that can be adopted whilst a research is ongoing. It has
key types and characteristics.
b) Focus Group—This involves a group discussion. The size of the group is determined
by the researcher. It aims to find out answers to “why, what, how, and when”
questions.
Quantitative research methods depend on the type of the research on board. The
following discussion focuses on this idea.
Longitudinal Survey
--These are conducted across various time durations, for example, in medicine.
--They are useful where sequence is critical for example progress in education, growth in
plants, effect of medicine on a patient and so on.
There are two categories of data collection. These are based on probability sampling and
non-probability sampling
Probability Sampling
3. Systematic Sampling—The starting point of a sample is chosen randomly. All others are
chosen using a fixed interval. This interval is determined by dividing the population size by
the sample size.
Non-Probability Sampling
3. Quota Sampling—In this form the researcher can select elements using his/her
knowledge of the target population. The members of various groups are chosen as per the
researchers understanding of the groups’ characteristics.
4. Snowball Sampling—This is used with target audiences which are difficult to contact. It is
useful with populations that are far apart.
Initial data is disorganized and does not reflect order. Therefore it needs to generate
a pattern. Data analysis is the action that attempts to find patterns in research information
and to make meaning out of such patterns. Data analysis is closely tied to the objectives of
the research. In turn the objectives of the research are a precursor to the research design. In
data analysis the first step is to determine descriptive statistics. These are sometimes
described as measures of central tendency. They are the mode, median and mean.
Mode
The mode is a measure that occurs most frequently. Equal samples of the same
population can have different modes. Take this example
1, 1, 3, 4, 4, 4, 6, 7, 5, 9
Median
The median is that number that divides ranked scores into two halves. The ranked scores
are arranged in ascending order. If the the number of scores are are even then the median
is the average of the two middle scores. Take these examples;-
2, 3, 4, 5, 6…….The median is 4
Example 2
Mean
The mean and average are used interchangeably. It is the only measure of central tendency
that takes all scores in the distribution. It is calculated by adding the sum of the entries and
dividing by the number of entries. It is by far the most commonly used measure.
Example
10, 2, 8, 6, 4,
Mean= 30/5=6
Range
In all data there is the smallest and the largest. The range is the difference between the
lowest and highest score in a data set. The smaller the range the closer the scores.
Obviously the opposite happens when the bigger it is then the larger the spread.
Variance
The variance is a measure of how far a set of numbers are spread out from their mean
(average) value. Variance is useful in science as a beginning in statistical analysis. To
calculate the variance follow these steps.
Standard Deviation
Correlation
Correlation is a technique of showing how strongly pairs of variables are related. These can
be, for example, height and weight, weight and age, gradient and crop growth etc. If you
take these examples then taller people tend to be heavier than shorter people. People of
the same height vary in weight. Correlation will tell you how much of the variation in
peoples’ height relates to weight. Correlation works for quantifiable data i.e. quantities of
one sort or another. When working with quantities correlations are precise. When working
with ratings they provide general indications.
The main result of a correlation is called correlation coefficient. It ranges from -1.0 to + 1.0
and it is indicated as r. The closer r is to -1 or + 1 the closer are the two variables. The closer
to 0 then the further apart are the variables. If r is positive it means that as one variable gets
larger the other gets larger. If r is negative it means that that as one variable gets larger the
other gets smaller. This is called inverse correlation.
The Collins English dictionary defines inference as the process by which a conclusion
is obtained from certain facts or premises. Inferential statistics follows from this definition.
The purpose of inferential statistics is to see whether sample findings can be representative
of a population parameter. We use inferential statistics to deduce the probability of what
might happen in a population. There are two main areas of inferential statistics;-
[Link] – That is taking a statistic from a sample and using it to estimate a population
trend.
1.e-Tivity
ECT 340 for teaching sem 2 2022-23 Page 35 of 90
a).Goto Google Search
e). Click on any of them and familiarize yourself with the content there-in
2.e-Tivity
a) Goto Youtube
Assessment Questions
References
[Link] Britannica
3. Ojo O.O., Tella A., Opateye J.A., Apata S.O., (ODL 709) Research Methods in Distance
Education, National Open University of Nigeria, Module
6. rafeedalimu @ [Link]
7. [Link]
[Link]
9. [Link]
By
The purpose of this course is to help you build skills for instructional research aimed at improving
classroom practice. In particular it will guide you to develop observational and analytical skills.
Further, it will guide you on how you can carefully and systematically ask and answer own questions
about teaching and learning, and how to apply the instructional research in your own classroom
practices.
IV.1 Introduction
Bridging instructional research and practice is a professional engagement in which the
teacher examines and applies action research methodologies and findings for instructional
improvement. In this lesson we will explore the process of bridging instructional research
and practice.
The process of bridging and applying instructional research starts from a clear understanding of
classroom research techniques. These techniques have been shared with you in the previous
lessons. The instructional research techniques include identification of the problem, stating the
specific objectives, the theoretical underpinnings. It further includes suggesting appropriate
research design and methodology of collecting and analyzing data. The final component in this
process is to interpret and discussion of the analyzed data.
Besides clear understanding of the research techniques, you would require examining the
findings and identifying those that can relate to your class. Some of the study findings that
would impact on your instructional practices relate to differentiated learning, given in
appendix 1.
V. Self-assessment questions
a) Explain the process of bridging instructional research and practice.
b) What challenges would limit extent and quality of application of instructional research in
your teaching and learning?
c) Explain how you would overcome some of the challenges identified in (b) above
Ruth Shaguory, Ruth Hubbard and Brenda Miller Power (2003), The Art of Classroom inquiry:
A handbook for Teacher Researchers, Pearson Education Publishers, California.
Lieberman, Ann & Miller, Lynne. Eds (2009). Teachers in professional communities:
Improving teaching and learning, Journal of Educational change 10(1) 79-82
DOI:10.1007/s10833-008-9094-6
Students have distinct aptitudes and diverse learning styles. It is therefore imperative for teachers to
plan lessons that use differentiated instructions. Differentiated instructional strategies can involve
adjusting
Content – the media and methods teachers use to impart and instruct skills, ideas and
information
Processes – the exercises and practices students perform to better understand content.
Product – The materials, such as tests and projects, students complete to demonstrate
understanding.
To help create lessons that engage and resonate with a diverse classroom the teacher can apply the
following differentiated instructional strategies:
1. Creating learning stations – provide different types of content by setting up learning stations
(divide sections of the classroom through which groups of students rotate) . Each station should
use a unique method of teaching a skill or concept related to the lesson, for example students
can rotate between stations that involve: Watching a video, creating art, reading an article,
completing puzzles, listening to you explain. To help students process the content after they
have been through the stations, you can hold a class discussion or assign questions to answer.
2. Use task cards – Task cards allows the teacher to give students a range of content. Such task
cards can have different learning activities and can be sourced from worksheets or in text books.
Organize the class into groups to rotate through the different tasks.
3. Interview schedule – Asking questions about learning and studying styles can help the teacher to
pinpoint the kinds of content that will meet your class needs. While running learning stations or
group activities, pull each student aside and ask about:
Their favorite types of lesson
Their favorite in=class activities
Which projects they are most proud of
Which kind of exercises help them remember key lesson points
Track your results to identify themes and students with uncommon preferences. This would
help you determine which methods of instruction suit their abilities.
4. Target different senses within lessons – Appeal to a range of senses visual, tactile, auditory and
kinesthetic senses. You can use plying cards, infographics, audiobooks, getting students to act
out a scene; incorporating charts and illustrations within texts, giving both spoken and written
directions to tasks, using relevant physical objects, allotting time for students to create artistic
reflections and interpretations of lessons.
5. Share your own strengths and weaknesses – Explain to your students that not everyone builds
skills and process information the same way. Explain, on a personal level, how you study and
review lessons. Share tactics that do and don’t work for you.
6. Use the think=pair share strategy – start by asking students to individually think about a given
topic or answer a specific question. Next, pairt students together to discuss their results and
5.1 Introduction
In chapter four of this module, we learnt about bridging instructional research and
practice and ways of applying research in instruction. In this chapter, we shall explore
ways of collaborating in research and ways of carrying out research that involves more
than one discipline. In particular, we shall learn the definitions and principles of
collaborative and multidisciplinary research, rationale for collaborative research,
designing collaborative research and rules governing participation in collaborative
research. We shall also explore benefits of collaborative and multidisciplinary research
for teachers in various disciplines and/or schools or localities, challenges that teachers
may face in collaborative research and ways of mitigating them.
Collaborative and multidisciplinary research has an impact not only on the practice of
teaching and learning, but also provides a platform for teachers to engage, learn and
generate new knowledge aimed at improving practice. The findings of collaborative and
multidisciplinary research are intended to improve ways of teaching and learning as well
as improve learning outcomes across disciplines and learning areas.
This chapter will cover a discussion of collaborative and multidisciplinary research, the
principles and examples of collaborative and multidisciplinary research and benefits of
collaborative research. It will also cover how to design a collaborative and
multidisciplinary study and carry out a collaborative research. We shall also discuss how
to participate actively, challenges likely to be faced and ways of mitigating them.
T-Together
E-Everyone
A-Achieves
M-More
There is sufficient evidence that collaborations improve the quality of work and
effectiveness. According to Dolovich (2015), working in teams:
can integrate ideas across disciplines, advance thinking within and across
disciplines, and go deeper and broader to create knowledge that can be used to
develop novel, more meaningful solutions. Individual team members can also get
to know new people (their fellow team members), achieve greater personal
Numbering, 5.3.1
pacing &
sequencing
Title Definitions of collaborative and multidisciplinary
research
Purpose The purpose of this e-tivity is to define collaborative
and multidisciplinary research and differentiating
collaborative and multidisciplinary research from
other types of research.
Brief summary a) Read
of the overall [Link]
task [Link]
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
Spark
Source:
[Link]
action/
According to the Cambridge English dictionary, a principle is ‘a basic idea or rule that explains
or controls how something happens or works.’ In collaborative and multidisciplinary research,
the most important principle is common interest in addressing an issue or solving a problem that
is of mutual benefit to all participants in the research. Other guiding principles include:
Effective leadership: is for a collaboration to have a leader with a vision that the leader
is able to share and explain to the members for effective ‘buy-in’ such that it becomes a
shared vision for all members of the collaboration. An effective leader is able to resolve
conflicts in a way that ensures continued progress towards the achievements set for the
collaboration.
Effective communication: is communication that is received and understood by the
intended audience in the way that is envisaged by the sender. In addition, effective
communication is clear (easy to understand such that the recipient has adequate
information needed to take the expected action), concise (brief and to the point, avoiding
unnecessary repetitions), concrete (clarity of expression), correct (free of errors),
coherent (logical and connected to the main topic), complete (contains the relevant
information needed for the intended action by the recipient) and courteous (friendly,
honest, empathetic and assertive rather than aggressive).
For members of a multidisciplinary team it is important to understand the language in the
discipline for communication to become effective.
Numbering, 5.4.1
pacing &
sequencing
Title Principles of collaborative and multidisciplinary research
Purpose The purpose of this e-tivity is to understand the principles
that guide collaborative and multidisciplinary research.
Brief a) Read the provided links
summary of [Link]
the overall [Link]
task
b) List guiding principles relevant to collaborative and
multidisciplinary research
Spark
[Link]
Individual Using the content in one of your teaching subjects, identify a
task topic for research through collaborative and
multidisciplinary research approach
There are several variations of collaborative and multidisciplinary research for teachers.
Numberin 5.5.1
g, pacing
&
sequencing
Title Examples of collaborative and multidisciplinary research
Purpose The purpose of this e-tivity is to build your understanding
of collaborative and multidisciplinary research by providing
real life examples.
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
There are several benefits in the use of collaborative and multidisciplinary research.
c. Teams that engage in collaborative research has a strong sense of purpose and
participation is on a collegial basis (titles and positions do not matter that much);
increases the chances of finding
Numbering 5.6.1
, pacing &
sequencing
Title Benefits of collaborative and multidisciplinary research
Purpose The purpose of this e-tivity is to understand the importance
of collaborative and multidisciplinary research.
Brief a) Read the provided link
Spark
[Link]
naturejobs/2017/09/11/multidisciplinary-research-pros-
and-cons/
Individual Using the content in one of your teaching subjects, list some
task benefits that would accrue from collaborative and
multidisciplinary research.
The purpose of a collaborative and multidisciplinary research is to solve a problem in teaching and
learning aimed at improving learning outcomes. A problem is generally perceived as a gap between
what is desired and what is exists in a given situation. For example, as a Mathematics teacher, you have
observed that the performance in geometry among form two students is below your expectations and in
your assessment, if the trend continues, the students will reach form four without requisite knowledge
and skills to perform well in the national examination and proceed to university. There are several steps
needed in the design of a collaborative and research study.
1. The first step is to analyse available information in the school about performance
over a period of time so you are able to assess the magnitude of the problem.
Through discussions with other teachers and the administration, you learn that the
problem is not specific to the school. It is actually a problem in the entire zone.
2. The second is to document the problem in a way that others you decide to share
with will understand the problem so they join you in the looking for a solution.
Once others are convinced of the need to solve the problem, then discussion
begins on the need for collaboration and the design of the study.
Numberin 5.7.1
g, pacing
&
sequencin
g
Title Designing a collaborative and multidisciplinary research
Outline the steps you would take when designing collaborative and
multidisciplinary research
Spark
[Link]
collaborative-multidiscipinary-research/
Individual Using the content in one of your teaching subjects, design a
task collaborative and multidisciplinary research covering a teaching
area of your choice
Interaction Provide your assessment on the given collaborative and
begins multidisciplinary research design by the team learners. Do this on
the discussion forum on the Kusoma platform.
E- 1. Ensure that learners are focused on the contents and
moderator context of discussion.
interventio 2. Stimulate further learning and generation of new ideas.
ns 3. Provide feedback on the learning progress.
4. Close the e-tivity.
Schedule This task should take one hour.
and time
Next Carrying out a collaborative and multidisciplinary research
full/10.
1002/geo2.46
Individual task Using the content in one of your teaching subjects, outline
the steps needed to build a multidisciplinary team and state
how you would maintain the team to successfully complete
the research project
Interaction Provide your assessment on feedback given by the team. Do
begins this on the discussion forum on the Kusoma platform
E-moderator 1. Ensure that learners are focused on the contents
interventions and
The main principle governing the success of collaborative and multidisciplinary research projects
is for every team member to abide by the rules set by the team at the beginning of the study and
as revised from time to time. The quality of the product depends entirely on the modus operandi
of the team. It is important to note that a winning team competes outwards with other teams not
inwards among the team members.
While it is important to set the rules of operation and everyone tries to follow them strictly, it is
important to recognize that there will be challenges dealing with a team that may arise and need
to be mitigated for the success of the research.
a. Unclear guidelines on the modus operandi. It is important that the team have a written
agreement on the way they will operate, who the team leader is and the responsibilities
for each individual and discipline needed for smooth operation of the research
b. Engaging in the research process without a thorough knowledge of the research methods
and the expected results. Before embarking on the research projects, all the participants
must be taken through the methodology of the research.
c. Infrequent communication with the team leader and other team members can cause
misunderstanding that hampers progress of the project. It is important for the team leader
to continually provide guidance on the research project. Poor communication gets on the
way of the progress of the research. It is important to agree on the frequency of
communication to clarify the doubts regarding the research topic and to know what the
team leader expects from the participants
d. Time management is needed for each member of the team. People working in a team
tend to slacken on timelines for deliverables and this tends to slow down progress of the
Assessment questions
Knowledge
1. Which of the following best describes the reason for engaging in a collaborative and
multidisciplinary research?
a. Common area of interest
b. Friendship between teachers
c. The need to make money
d. All the above
2. Which one of the following is a principle of collaborative and multidisciplinary
research?
a. Tasks not shared out equitably
b. Effective communication
c. One member taking all the credit for the success of the project
d. Members quarreling one another
3. Which one of the following is an example of a collaborative and multidisciplinary
research?
a. Factors that influence teaching and learning of Mathematics in Kawaida
county in Azure
b. Influence of agriculture on the economy of Mukutano district in Zanco
Republic
c. An assessment of the production and uptake of educational research in Uzuri
Republic
d. Impact of watching television on mastery of English language skills among
secondary school students in Upendo county in Ziwa Republic
Comprehension
ii. Outline the main steps in undertaking the collaborative research involving Mathematic
and Chemistry teachers
Application
State and explain three benefits that you as a teacher will accrue from participating in a
collaborative and multidisciplinary research
Analysis
You are the principal investigator in a collaborative study with fellow teachers in your school.
List three challenges you are likely to face and how you will mitigate them.
Synthesis
You have been appointed to lead a team to investigate the impact of online learning on
performance at secondary school level. List the collaborators you will bring into this study and
the reason why
Evaluation
You have been involved in a study assessing the impact of music concepts on performance in
geometry at secondary school level. Explain the recommendations you are likely to make on
improving the performance of geometry using music concepts.
REFERENCES
In research, report writing is about the researcher telling the readers a story that has emerged
from the research findings. Once a study is undertaken, a report is written to present factual
information based on the investigation to solve a problem or make a decision on an issue being
investigated. It is necessary once a study is done for a report to be processed and shared among
the interested parties for sharing information can help to develop common purposes and aims,
spread successful innovations, build on successes, and avoid reinventing wheels and duplicating
mistakes (Lowcay, 2003). According to Kalucy (2014), reports can be written in different forms
depending on the nature of study and the most common types of reports are:
a) contractual reports which are primarily required for accountability and performance
assessment purposes to keep people focused on desired change and to help them decide what
b) project reports that provide details on the overall project at the point of completion and
are written in a way that enables the reader to assess the quality and importance of the
information with the aim of persuading the reader to agree with the conclusions and
recommendations.
project/ program. They generally cover most if not all evaluation indicators, including the
d) an annual report which is a good marketing tool that presents the actions and
Two forms of a report are: a memo or long term report as in a paper or a printed book. When
According to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA) (2010),
a report must follow a standard format which should include all the necessary structures of a
i. Title Page
vi. Conclusions
viii. References
a. Cover letter
b. Bibliography
c. Glossary and
d. Appendices
It is a practice in research that writing a good report is a skill and as such requires training and
discipline to develop the good writing skills. The principles of good report writing as a practice
a] writes in the third person, e.g.: According to the examiner…, There seems to be …, It is the
b] uses single space to condense the length of the report for a long report can be daunting to the
c] keeps being concise and to the point as too many words is not always a good thing,
d] writes in past tense as often as possible for the work has already been done,
e] to underline, bold or italicize paragraph headings so that they stand out and are easy to locate,
f] write reports using complete sentences and be sure your sentences make sense and you have
checked the spelling and grammar to be sure there are no errors and
g] stays subjective for the report is about listing the facts, not our opinions.
Richardson (2017) argues that whether it's a book report, a lab report, a memo or a formal report,
all reports share common principles, or rules. The purpose of a report in an academic setting is to
communicate what was done by whom, how it was done, what the results were and what
conclusions can be drawn from it. Reports can be written in any field about any subject, from
writing, there are basically four principles of report writing, that is:
i] be relevant, by thoroughly searching the existing literature about your topic, and clearly define
the problem under investigation. This is to ensure that the topic is addressing current issues and
those relevant to the area of study right from the introduction through the entire paper in order to
answer gaping questions in the field of study.
ii] organize the report logically for any research work should make sense to the reader and thus
the report must be organized in a logical and formulaic format. The researcher must ensure that
the methods used are clear enough for anybody to follow the study as the major findings and
discussions on how they either answer or do not answer your original question or problem under
investigation.
iii] report accurately for the researcher should ensure that the report is well researched and
contain factual information. It is important that the report should be objective and accurate to
support the findings.
iv] succinctly summarize the report for the reader will appreciate the findings by looking in both
your introduction and your discussion to find a summary of your report, including the main
focus, or problem, and the results of your investigation and a summary thereof for clarity.
Kaplan and Norton, (1992) argue that a good reporting process requires that the researcher thinks
through the research process to ascertain the accuracy and adequacy of information that can be
verified at any one point and this can be expressed as exemplified in figure 1 below:
struggle to make out the meaning of what you write for the elements of good style in writing can
be summed up very simply as be brief; be clear and be human when presenting the report
(Forsyth, 2010; Evans, & Gruba 2002). Essentially in research, report writing cannot be done
until most of the data has been collected and analyzed to establish meaning and then present
these views in a form of a report. In some cases, data already exist in the form of archival
documents or literary texts from which a researcher can begin the interpretation
much earlier in the research process in the form of report writing. The process of research results
in a collection of facts and ideas that emerge from your analysis. This wealth of information need
to be into a written text that will make sense to a reader, and do justice to your findings. The task
of writing a report is daunting and nerve breaking. How then will you decide which aspects of
your findings are the most interesting and important to report on?
The most important starting point is to remind yourself what the task of writing up research is all
about and according to Golden-Biddle & Locke (1997) “…the major task of writing involves
working out how to make contextually grounded theoretical points that are viewed as a
contribution by the relevant professional community of readers. Essentially, this means the
research should be focused in presenting the ideas of the findings, that is, you need to make
thesis-chapters/reporting-and-discussing-your-findings)
6.2 Activity 1
In doing research, the researcher needs to be clear in the mind what the research is all about and
how it is going to be conducted. In writing a report, the researcher summarizes the facts about
the study. Pick a topic of choice or a written research paper and carry out the following activity:
a.) Write down all the things you know now that you didn't know when you started the research.
b.) Sort the sentences into groups. Give each group a heading. Now check the headings against
your research question(s). Do all the headings relate to the research question(s)? Do the
questions need refining? Do the refining to crystalize the meaning for the reader.
c.) Use these groups and headings to make a plan of the points you want to make in your
discussion.
6.3 Activity 2
1. Write about your data for Five (5) minutes. You don't have to show what you write to anyone.
2. Stop.
3. Now read over what you've written. Have you learnt anything? Is there anything there you
want to develop further? You could try highlighting key words, or identifying any points that
The presentation of results from the study should have a logical organization that reflects:
the aim(s) or research objectives and/or question(s) of the study including any hypotheses
study.
Thus, writing professionally requires that you are not simply describing the data but you need to
make connections, and make apparent your reasons for your thinking so in order to make sense
to 3the reader. This summary is important and necessary in tying together the loose ends in a
study.
6.3 Conclusion
A conclusion is not merely a summary of the main topics covered or a re-statement of a research
problem, but a synthesis of key points and, if applicable, where the researcher recommends new
areas for future research. It is often argued that for most college-level research papers, one or
two well-developed paragraphs is sufficient for a conclusion, although in some cases, three or
research project and any scientific discipline, drawing conclusions is the final, and most
important, part of the process. Essentially, here a researcher tries to summarize what they believe
has been learned from the research, and will try to assess the strength of the hypothesis or
thinking. It is arguable therefore that conclusions are not simply a summary of the findings in
research that you have conducted. The conclusion in writing provides the potential to explore in
depth and detail the broader implications of the findings, while stating the limitations of the
research and clearly delineating the parameters of the study meant to create understanding of the
facts ([Link]
In research, the most critical part is to be able to analyze, apply and draw conclusions from the
information and then ultimately make the best recommendations of the study. This in the eyes of
goals and recommendations for the reader to appreciate a piece of writing and the results
achieved. When writing a conclusion, it is worthy ensuring that you conclude an essay with one
c) Use a quotation.
A conclusion provides a thoughtful end to a piece of writing but unfortunately, many conclusions
in college-level papers are a little more than summaries of what has already been said. Here are
b. Introducing a new idea or subtopic to your conclusion although you may end with a
provocative question.
c. Focusing on a trivial point that will not contribute much to the conclusion.
d. Apologizing for your view by saying such things as "I may not be an expert" or "At least
this is my opinion."
The salient and final step in the research process is to put all the pieces of thoughts together in a
lively discussion of key findings as supported by facts and their implications for theory and
practice, together with the limitations associated with those conclusions, and recommendations
thereof for future research. The challenge is how will you draw conclusions from the work under
study or what are the limitations that you have identified in the design thus far that impacts your
study? The conclusion should directly address the purpose statement of your study and the
expected the expected outcome of the study as directly linked to the problem statement. The
conclusions drawn should help the reader and practitioners use this new knowledge as necessary.
Because research generates further research, a conclusions drawn from your research are
important and meaningful. A well-researched piece of work through writing creates a good bond
among researchers who strive always for truth and clarity and to eschew falsehood and
deception. In the conclusion to your report, it is recommended you do the following important
things ([Link]
a. Summarize the main points you made in your introduction and review of the literature
b. Review (very briefly) the research methods and/or design you employed.
e. Mention the limitations of your research (due to its scope or its weaknesses)
Therefore, in any research project and any scientific discipline, drawing conclusions is the final,
whichever reasoning processes and research methods that were used, the final conclusion is
It is necessary when drawing a conclusion to summarize the main ideas of the Study. Identify a
2.1.1 Activity
a] List at least three (3) reasons why drawing a conclusion in research is necessary.
b] Read an identified piece of research and summarize the conclusions drawn by the writer of
that paper
c] Having read the paper and the conclusions drawn by the researcher, how are your conclusions
different from those drawn in the paper you have read and why?
Activity 2.1.2
a] Design a study and hypothetically identify the likely conclusions you will draw from that
b] List at least three (3) challenges you think you have experienced from drawing a conclusion
c] Briefly summarize to a college student why drawing a conclusion in research is necessary and
Research shows that a well-written conclusion provides you with important opportunities to
demonstrate to the reader your understanding of the research problem and these include
([Link]
i) Remember just as the introduction gives a first impression to your reader, the conclusion
iv)Demonstrating the importance of your ideas by not shying for the conclusion offers you
v) Introducing possible new or expanded ways of thinking about the research problem.
Further research has shown that when drawing a conclusion to your study use the following
general rules:
State your conclusions clearly by re-stating the purpose of your study by showing what
were the unique or new contributions your study made to the overall research about your
topic.
Do not simply reiterate your results or the discussion of your results for it is advisable to
provide a synthesis of arguments presented in the paper to show how these converge to
address the research problem and the overall objectives of your study
Indicate opportunities for future research and also highlight the need for further research
to provide the reader with evidence that you have an in-depth awareness of the research
problem.
It is also important to consider the following points to help ensure your conclusion is presented
i) If the argument or purpose of your paper is complex, you may need to summarize the
or if you are proceeding inductively, use the end of your paper to describe your main
iii) Move from a detailed to a general level of consideration that returns the topic to the
context provided by the introduction or within a new context that emerges from the data.
Report writing in research and drawing conclusions are two important activities as this gives the
researcher chance to reflect on the study and tie together the findings for the reader to make
In writing an effective report, the researcher needs to be clear and succinctly compel the
narrative to the reader. The researcher should move beyond merely summarizing the facts and
knowledge.
ii. Cite a relevant quotation from your literature review to lend authority to the
iii. Explain the consequences of your research in a way that elicits action or demonstrates
iv. Illustrate your concluding point with a relevant narrative drawn from your own life
experiences.
statement that you want the reader to remember about your study.
It is evidently clear that drawing conclusions in research is necessary and requires the researcher
to crystalize his findings in a manner meant to establish the truth. It is clear from the discussions
why drawing a conclusion comes at the end of a research process for it is intended to help the
reader understand why a research should matter to them after they have finished reading a piece
of work. Therefore, a conclusion is not merely a summary of the main topics covered or a re-
statement of your research problem, but a synthesis of key points and, if applicable, the
6.4.3 Assignments
This topic emphasized on the need to be organized in report writing in research and the steps to
consider in each case you are teaching a lesson. The assignment here for discussion is to help the
student teacher develop skills in handling a report writing and drawing conclusions in research
a) Identifying six problems that a teacher trainee should avoid when drawing conclusions
i. [Link]
ii. [Link]
Evans, D., & Gruba, P. (2002). How to Write a Better Thesis (2nd ed.). Parkville: Melbourne
University Press.
Golden-Biddle, K., & Locke, K. (1997). Composing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Publications.
Forsyth, P. (2010). How to write reports, and proposals. 2nd rev. ed. London: Kogan Page.
Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. (2010). 6th ed. Washing, DC:
APA.
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
writing/tutorial/chapter4/[Link]
[Link]
Kaplan, R and Norton, D (1992) in [Link]
that-drive-performance-2
([Link]
Further Readings
Magdalinski, T. (2013). Study skills for sports studies. Abingdon, Oxon.: Routledge. Chapter 7:
[Link]
Information
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
reporting-findings/
[Link]
7.1. Introduction
After going through the research process, the last step is to disseminate information to the
education , curriculum developers and policy makers .In this lesson therefore , we will focus on
strategies of dissemination information and lastly the challenges faced by the teacher researcher
3. Discuss the challenges faced by the teacher researcher in disseminating research findings
objectives are attained and the target audience is reached with the findings.
The concept dissemination connotes either an act or a process of spreading information, ideas,
news to a wider audience or public. Research dissemination therefore the process by which
producers of micro data from surveys and from public and official statistics make their data
that is specific and potentially useable, from one social system to another. (Louis and van
doi=[Link].5286&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
In the case of teacher researcher, it refers to a planned process of reaching out to education
stakeholders and communicating to them and the wider audience the findings of the research
research-dissemination).
Numberin 1.2.3
g, pacing
and
sequencin
Purpose The purpose of this e-tivity is to help you to understand the meaning of research
dissemination.
summary 1. [Link]
orall task
Dr. Gregory Price; only the first slide for 0.20 mins
Spark
Individual a) Using bullet points, outline the key themes in the definition of dissemination .
Interactio a) Post two themes that are common in the dissemination of a teacher research
E- 1,Ensure that learners are focused on the content and context of the discussion
and time
i. Creates awareness among the stakeholders of the state of education and improves on
ii. Moves research from theory to policy and into practice where the targeted audience will
vii. It gives voice to the teacher and ensures that the research findings reach a wider audience.
N 1.2.3
be
ri
ng
pa
ci
ng
se
ue
nc
in
tle
P The purpose of this e-tivity is to enable you to explain the importance of research dissemination.
ur
po
se
ri 1. [Link]
ef [Link]://[Link]/publication/
ta 309603344_The_Role_of_Dissemination_as_a_Fundamental_Part_of_a_Research_Project_Lessons
sk _Learned_from_S[Link]
309603344_The_Role_of_Dissemination_as_a_Fundamental_Part_of_a_Research_Project_Lessons
_Learned_from_SOP
pa
rk
In a) Using bullet points, outline the key themes in the importance of dissemination.
vi
ua
ta
sk
In a) Post two themes that are common in the importance of a teacher research
te b) Provide positive and constructive feedback on the explanation given on the dissemination of
cti [Link] .
on
at
or
in
te
rv
en
ti
on
he
ul
an
ti
ex
1. What is being disseminated? This refer to the message of dissemination which must be
2. Who is recipient of the message and is she, the best audience for this message?
3. Who is carrying out the dissemination? It could be a single researcher, or a group of teacher
researchers or the principal doing it on behalf of the school and research team.
5. When will the dissemination done. This is referring to when the information is likely to reach
The answers to these questions will influence the strategies for dissemination the strategies of
dissemination in teacher based research include but are not limited to the following:
Report writing which will be at two levels; during the research to inform the
funders, the parents and the school administration on the progress of the research.
a. Mass media is an effective tool which can inform the parents, the wider
teacher community and the community in general of the findings .The media
Numbering, 1.2.3
pacing and
sequencing
Purpose The purpose of this e-tivity is to enable you to understand the questions raised during
summary 1. [Link]
orall task
[Link]://[Link]/academy/lesson/strategies-for-disseminating-educational-research-
Spark
Individual a) Using bullet points, explain the importance of the questions raised in the notes and
b) Identify any of the strategies highlighted in the video and pdf and explain which
Interaction a) Post your response to any two importance in ( a.) above on the forum.
E-moderator 1,Ensure that learners are focused on the content and context of the discussion
and time
of research itself, their own characteristics and school environment. Among the difficulties they
face are;
a. Lack of expertise in research dissemination tools. This is a new area and many teachers
b. Limited time for research and teaching. Many teachers feel overloaded with their
body. Both writing manuscripts for publication and publication is costly for the average
d. There is no clear valid method of dissemination. This leaves new teacher – researchers
open to trial and error and criticism from older and more experienced researchers.
Number 1.2.3
ing,
pacing
and
sequenci
ng
researcher in dissemination.
summar 1. [Link]
y orall Challenges%20in%20disseminating%20review%20findings%20a%20case%[Link]
task
Spark
Individu a) Using bullet points outline the key themes in the challenges of research dissemination.
Interacti a) Post two themes that are relevant but are not in the notes but can be inferred
[Link]
[Link] [Link]
E- 1,Ensure that learners are focused on the content and context of the discussion
tions
e and
time
Questions
1. Using your own words define the phrase teacher research dissemination.
4 . A part from information given on strategies of dissemination, explain other approaches which