Non-Hermitian Metasurfaces Review
Non-Hermitian Metasurfaces Review
Review article
Open Access. © 2018 Xiang Zhang et al., published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-
NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Brought to you by | University of California - Berkeley
Authenticated
Download Date | 6/4/18 5:05 AM
2 X. Ren et al.: Nonconventional metasurfaces
[16, 17], metaholograms [18, 19], and multifunctional system. The original and unperturbed eigenstates in the
metasurfaces [20]. system hybridize to form new eigenstates, and due to the
Our group is interested in developing metasurfaces anti-Hermitian coupling, some of the new eigenstates are
with unique physics that enable novel functionalities. decoupled from the decay channels and have very long
Based on the design principle of phase gradient metas- lifetimes, whereas others have enhanced decay rates and
urface, we have experimentally realized exciting phe- can radiate very strongly (superradiant state).
nomena and functionalities, including strong photonic In plasmonic systems, anti-Hermitian couplings
spin-Hall effect (PSHE) [21] and ultrathin invisibility have played an important role in introducing interfer-
skin cloak at visible wavelength [22]. Furthermore, we ence among different excitation pathways. Aside from
are interested in combining classical phase gradient the well-studied plasmon-induced transparency [27, 28]
metasurfaces with quantum emitters, which may open and interacting dark resonance [29], which comes from
up opportunities for on-chip quantum state engineer- destructive interference between isolated and continuum
ing. By placing a judiciously designed metasurface at the states, opposite phenomena such as electromagneti-
far field of quantum emitters, we theoretically showed cally induced absorption and superscattering have also
that phenomena such as quantum interference between been demonstrated. In 2012, our group showed that the
orthogonal decay channels [23] and qubit entanglement anti-Hermitian coupling could also be used to spatially
[24] could be achieved. manipulate light at the deep subwavelength scale [25].
Classical phase gradient metasurfaces work in the We showed that, by designing an anti-Hermitian coupling
regime where the meta-atoms need to be well separated matrix, a system of plasmonic meta-atoms closely packed
such that the interaction between neighboring meta- within only λ/15 separations can be individually excited
atoms is negligible. Consequently, each meta-atom can be from the far field, which are otherwise indistinguishable
treated independently and the functionality of the whole from each other.
metasurface is derived from individual meta-atoms. Our We begin with a system that consists of two closely
group is interested in developing a novel type of metasur- spaced plasmonic antennas, where the resonant wave-
faces, where the neighboring meta-atoms can be strongly length of each antenna is slightly different (Figure 1A).
coupled and the coupling efficiencies are uniquely engi- Due to the strong coupling between the antennas, the
neered. Specifically, we demonstrated that, by tailoring eigenstates of the system become hybridized excitations
the couplings to be anti-Hermitian, the spatial manipu- of two resonators. Therefore, in general, under plane wave
lation of light at the deep subwavelength scales could be excitation, both antennas will be excited. However, we
realized [25]. We expect that, by introducing coupling as found that, when the coupling is purely imaginary (anti-
a new degree of freedom in the metasurface design, more Hermitian), two simultaneously excited eigenstates inter-
novel properties can be achieved. In this paper, we review fere constructively at one resonator and destructively at
our research in optical metasurface in the past few years, the other, leading to a highly localized state. Although the
including anti-Hermitian coupled meta-atoms, PSHE at coupling coefficient is generally a complex number, anti-
metasurfaces, ultrathin invisibility skin cloak, as well as Hermitian coupling coefficient can be achieved by care-
quantum interference with metasurfaces. fully choosing the antenna separation, such that the real
part from the direct and indirect couplings exactly cancel
each other (Figure 1B).
Figure 1: Optical coupling between two optical antennas, which include real (Hermitian) and imaginary (anti-Hermitian) couplings.
(A) Plasmonic system consisting of two optical antennas made of gold. The system is deep subwavelength. (B) Simulated real part (black
square) and imaginary part (red circle) of optical coupling constant between the two antennas, as a function of their separation s. The
coupling consists both the direct near-field coupling and indirect coupling through the radiation channel. At a very small separation, the
coupling has a huge negative real part that comes from the direct near-field coupling. When the spacing increases, the magnitude of the
near-field coupling decreases rapidly. When s reaches 30 nm, the direct near-field coupling cancels with the real part from indirect far-field
coupling, leaving a pure imaginary (anti-Hermitian) coupling. Reprinted from Ref. [25]. Copyright © 2012 by the American Physical Society.
Figure 2: Experimental verification of the selective excitation of individual antennas in the plasmonic antenna array.
(A–E) Simulated near-field distributions of the antenna array at five different wavelengths: 1200 nm (250 THz), 1300 nm (230.8 THz), 1400 nm
(214.3 THz), 1500 nm (200 THz), and 1600 nm (187.5 THz). (F–J) Corresponding experimental observations show very good agreement with the
simulations. (K) Measured intensity of light integrated along the y-direction, versus the x-direction, at each measured wavelength. (L) Near-
field measurement at 1400 nm wavelength on the control sample, which consists of an array of antennas with the same geometry specifica-
tion but at a large nearest neighbor separation of 300 nm. Reprinted from Ref. [25]. Copyright © 2012 by the American Physical Society.
separations between the antennas were much larger. In We believe that the anti-Hermitian coupling can
this case, no selective excitation was observed and all the open up a route for light manipulation at deep subwave-
antennas were excited simultaneously. length scale and can introduce a new degree of freedom to
3 PSHE at metasurfaces
When meta-atoms are arranged on a surface, spatially
varying phase shift can be engineered at will and novel
device functionalities can be achieved. For example, meta-
surfaces can be an important tool to control and study
the spin-orbit coupling of light. We know from relativistic
physics that particles can have interaction between its spin Figure 3: Giant photonic spin hall effect with metasurfaces.
and its motion (i.e. spin-orbit coupling). Spin-orbit coupling (A) Schematic of the PSHE. When light is propagating along a
curved trajectory, the polarization of light will rotate accordingly.
has been observed in several particles, such as electrons,
This is due to the transverse nature of light. (B) PSHE induced by
protons, and neutrons, and is the origin of many important a metasurface with a strong phase gradient along the x-direction.
phenomena, including the fine structure splitting in atom’s When the light beam is incident onto the metasurface, opposite
energy levels [30] and magnetocrystalline anisotropy [31]. circular components of the beam accumulate on the opposite side
Photon possesses spin as well and theoretically in the transverse directions. (C) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
should also exhibit spin-orbit coupling [32]. However, this image of the fabricated metasurface. Reprinted from Ref. [21]. Copy-
right © 2013 by the AAAS.
coupling is usually very weak for photons and the amount
of splitting can only be detected by performing quantum
weak measurements with preselection and postselec-
the same angle but transversely transported against each
tion of spin states [33]. In 2013, our group experimentally
other. We envision that the use of metasurface will open
demonstrated strong spin-orbit interaction of light in a
a new degree of freedom to control the flow of light and
metasurface that contained spatially varying V-shaped
enable spin polarization-dependent novel functionalities.
nanoantennas [21]. We observed the PSHE, where light
showed a transverse splitting in polarizations when light
was refracted off the metasurface. The PSHE arises from
the fact that the momentum and polarization of light
4 U
ltrathin metasurface invisibility
are always perpendicular to each other (Figure 3). When skin cloak
light is propagating along a curved trajectory, the polari-
zation of the light has to rotate accordingly to maintain Metamaterials have been used to realize invisibility
the transverse property. As a back-action from geomet- cloaks, which can render objects to appear invisible to
ric polarization rotations, the spin-orbit interaction also incoming waves. The design principle of metamaterial
changes the propagation path of light, resulting in a cloaking falls into two categories: scattering cancellation
helicity-dependent transverse displacement of light (i.e. [34, 35] and transformation optics [6, 36, 37]. Scattering
PSHE). For an ordinary interface between two homoge- cancellation aims at cancelling out the major scatter-
neous media, when a Gaussian beam impinges onto the ing field from an object and can be achieved using one
interface at normal incidence, the axial symmetry normal or a few layers of plasmonic materials. This technique is
to the surface eliminates the spin-orbit coupling, and the mostly suitable for cloaking objects that are smaller than a
total angular momentum of the entire beam is conserved. few wavelengths, which have a small number of dominant
In our experiment, we designed a metasurface that intro- scattering harmonics. The other method (transformation
duced a rapid gradient of phase discontinuity along the optics) manipulates the flow of electromagnetic energy
interface, which broke the axial symmetry of the interface using a transformation that stretches and compresses
and allowed us to observe the PSHE. the Cartesian space. Because the Maxwell’s equations
The PSHE manifested by the metasurface can be have the same form under coordinate transformation, the
directly measured with a camera by recording the polar- wave propagation in the transformed space can be inter-
ization-dependent transport (Figure 4). Incident light preted as propagation in the physical space that has a
with opposite helicity are both anomalously refracted at spatial distribution of permittivity ε and permeability μ.
By specifically engineering ε and μ, metamaterials are embedded in dielectrics of higher index, which intro-
therefore capable of controlling the trajectory of light that duces an additional phase shift in the reflected light and
propagates inside. Since transformation cloaks were first makes the optical cloak itself visible by phase-sensitive
proposed by Pendry et al. [36] and Leonhardt [37] in 2006, detection.
the concept was realized not only for electromagnetic The recent development of metasurfaces provides
waves but also extended to acoustic waves [38] and even another way to manipulate wave propagation. Metasurfaces
the matter waves [39]. are able to induce strong phase shift within a deep sub-
Transformation cloaks usually require extreme elec- wavelength distance, providing a route to very thin (h = λ)
tromagnetic properties that are only achievable with cloaks [43–45]. In 2015, our group experimentally demon-
metallic metamaterials and have been experimentally strated a metasurface-based invisibility skin cloak working
demonstrated in microwave frequencies [6]. The realiza- at ~730 nm [22]. The cloak is an 80-nm-thick metasurface
tion of such cloaks at optical frequencies is hindered by tightly wrapped over an object and can hide the object from
a significant optical (ohmic) loss. In 2008, Li and Pendry optical detection (both intensity and phase detection). The
[40] proposed to use quasi-conformal mapping in trans- metasurface skin cloak consists of subwavelength-scale
formation optics, which can reduce the requirement for gold nanoantennas, which can locally manipulate the
extreme refractive index and anisotropy, allowing the use phase of the reflected light over the 2π range, as shown in
of dielectric metamaterials. This method laid the founda- Figure 5. By specifically designing each nanoantennas, for
tion of carpet cloaks, where the objects are hidden under any light incidence, the phase of the reflected light from the
a reflective layer (the carpet). Carpet cloak in visible range metasurface mimics that of light reflected from a flat mirror.
has later been experimentally demonstrated from micro- As a result, the reflected light shows no scattering pattern
wave [41] to optical frequencies [42]. from the object and the object disguises as a flat mirror.
There are a few drawbacks of carpet cloaks, which Moreover, because the phase is totally recovered, the object
hinder their applications in practice. First at all, carpet is undetectable even under phase-sensitive measurements.
cloaks are typically very bulky. This is because they With the complete wavefront and phase recovery from
require a large volume for refractive index modulation the metasurface skin cloak, we experimentally demon-
to avoid extreme electromagnetic properties. As a result, strated concealing a 3D object of arbitrary for a specific light
complex 3D fabrication with very high spatial resolution polarization. In our experiments, we fabricated an arbi-
is needed, and it is challenging to scale up this design trarily shaped 3D object with multiple bumps and dents,
to macroscopic objects. Moreover, in certain regions of and the total size of the object is ~36 × 36 μm (Figure 6A
the cloak, the varying index has to be smaller than the and B). For each nanoantenna on the object, it compen-
environment index, making it difficult to create a cloak sated the phase difference between the light scattered from
that works in air. Consequently, the cloak is usually the object and that from the base plane. The metasurface
was then designed and fabricated according to the height (γ0). Moreover, the change in the decay rate depends on
profile of the object. Experimentally, we showed that, the distance between the dipole and the surface and dies
under both direct wide-field imaging (Figure 6C and E) and off at distances beyond d ~ λ. This orientation-dependent
phase measurement (Figure 6D and F), the metasurface decay rate is the manifestation of anisotropic vacuum in
cloak can successfully hide the 3D object at ~730 nm wave- the vicinity of the mirror. However, it is important to note
length. Because the cloak is an ultrathin 2D structure, it is that two in-plane dipoles (x-y plane) located at the same
much easier to fabricate compared to previous volumetric height will have same decay rates.
cloaks and is fully scalable to macroscopic sizes. In 2015, we proposed and theoretically demonstrated
a judiciously metasurface that can be harnessed at single
photon level, which opened the door for quantum pho-
γ( r0 ) 6 πε0 1
=1+ Im[p*1 · Es ( r0 , r0 , ω)], (2)
γ0 | p1 |2 k 3
the decay rate depends on the scattered field at the the decay rate (rather than suppressing) for an x-dipole by
local of the emitter. One can design the metasurface changing its phase profile. Second, one can also design a
such that the Im[p*1 · Es ( r0 , r0 , ω)] < 0 for the x-dipole, metasurface whose performance is vice versa (i.e. it acts a
γ( r0 ) curved mirror for y-dipole while at the same time it acts as
which yields ∼ 1 (i.e. we suppress the decay rate).
γ0 a flat mirror for x-dipole).
However, with the same metasurface excited by y-dipole Anisotropic optical response yield interesting effects
γ( r0 ) if we consider a multilevel (in particular three-level atom)
Im[ p*1 · Es ( r0 , r0 , ω)] ∼ 0, which yield ~ 1. Such aniso
γ0 quantum emitter as shown in Figure 9 (right). To study
tropic response can be engineered over macroscopic the effect of anisotropic quantum vacuum on the dynam-
distance as shown in Figure 9, where show the decay of ics of a three-level atom with mutually orthogonal transi-
rate of both x- and y-dipoles as a function of the distance tion, we started with an atom in the excited state |a1> and
from the metasurface. For y-dipole, we clearly see (as located at the focal spot of the metasurface (acting as a
designed) a conventional mirror-type response; however, curved mirror). In free space, the population of the level
for x-dipole, one can suppress the decay rate over mac- |a1> will follow exponential decay (linear on the log-scale)
roscopic distances. Interestingly, the upper limit to the as shown by the dashed green curve. However, in the pres-
distance for x-dipole is governed by the photonic coher- ence of the metasurface, the transitions |a1,2 > – > | b > are
ence length. However, other factors such as fabrication coupled and the decay of the level |a1> is slowed down
defects and size of the metasurface also limit the distance (dashed red curve). More interestingly, we have a finite
dmax. Here, we would like to emphasize two points. First, population transferred to the level |a2> (solid red curve).
metasurface design also gives us the flexibility to enhance Such radiative excitation of the orthogonal states is “only”
1.0
1
γyy/γ0
Normalized decay rate
|a〉
(Metasurface)
0.9 γ 0.1 P1
|b〉
0.8 d 0.01 P2
Me
tas
urf
ace z 1E–3
0.7
y x
1E–4 Isotropic quantum vacuum
0.6
γxx/γ0 (No physical boundary)
1E–5
0.5 0 2 4 6 8 10
1 2 3 100
Time (γ0t)
Distance (d/λ0)
possible in the presence of the metasurface. Furthermore, plasmonic waveguide case the qubits are in the near field;
controlling the interaction between the atomic and mole- the metasurface platform provides a route for a more fea-
cular excitation channels has led to several interesting sible experimental demonstration, as it is immune to the
effects [51–55]. stringent plasmonic near-field position requirement of
In 2017, we proposed and theoretically demonstrated the qubits. We would like to highlight that, in the scheme
that an optimally designed metasurface can be used to of our metasurface, the interaction channel between the
generate quantum correlation between two qubits by intro- qubits is a far-field channel; thus, they offer an oppor-
ducing interaction channels mediated by the metasurface. tunity for a spatially scalable architecture to entangle
Figure 10 (left) shows the transient evolution of concur- qubits. By spatially scalable, we refer to the ability of the
rence between two qubits located at h = 10λ from the meta- metasurface to efficiently redirect the light from the source
surface and separated by a distance of d = 20λ and initially qubit to the target qubit for any given separation between
prepared in the separable state |Ψ12(0)⟩ = | a1⟩⊗ | b2⟩. In the them. Such a unique capability results in the dependence
presence of the metasurface (blue line), the maximum of the phase profile imparted by the metasurface on the
value of concurrence is 0.366, which is two orders of mag- separation between the qubits. Figure 10 (right) shows the
nitude higher than vacuum (red line). The heat map in maximum concurrence between two qubits as a function
the inset shows the maximum value of concurrence in the of distance. We see that, in the near-field regime (d = λ),
collective parameters space. Green and black lines denote the entanglement achieved in the presence of metasurface
equal maximum concurrence lines of lossless and actual coincides with qubits in vacuum, however, as the separa-
metasurfaces, respectively. tion between the qubits increases, beyond wavelength, we
Common approaches to entangle qubits use, inter clearly see the advantage of the metasurface.
alia, waveguides [56], localized surface plasmon [57], pho- There are several opportunities to experimen-
tonic crystals [58], and microcavities [59]. Efficient entan- tally verify metasurface-mediated far-field anisotropic
glement via these platforms requires stringent near-field quantum vacuum and entangled qubits. We begin with
position of the qubits, which is imperative for achieving our first choice, which is trapped atoms. In stark con-
high β factor. However, this requirement is an arduous trast to the solid-state quantum emitters, atoms benefit
task in experiments. Moreover, plasmonic waveguides from being identical with well-known atomic transitions
lack scalability to macroscopic distances due to ohmic in optical regime, easily polarizable, and their optical
losses. In light of these inherent limitations of the exist- properties can be controlled on ultrafast time scales. The
ing platforms to enable on-chip quantum entanglement cooling and trapping of single atoms (alkali atoms) are
of macroscopically separated qubits, which are trapped in done very routinely in a cold atom community [60]. More
the far field, the metasurface scheme offers an appealing importantly, the precision in the location of the trapped
platform with novel and unconventional results. As for the atom could be within tens of nanometers from the desired
metasurface case, the qubits are in the far field (located at position. On the contrary, solid-state quantum emitters
a height of 20λ above the metasurface), whereas for the such as quantum dots, color-centers, and defects in 2D
semiconductors could also serve as a two-level system. and thin planar structure, metasurfaces can be a promis-
The key requirements for selecting quantum emitters ing candidate for on-chip quantum studies.
(atomic or solid-state) are (a) in-plane dipole moment and
(b) good quantum yield. The first requirement stems from Acknowledgments: The authors acknowledge the funding
metasurface nanoantennas, which only respond to elec- support from the Multidisciplinary University Research
tric field parallel to the antennas. On the contrary, high Initiative from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research
quantum yield is required for measurable signal-to-noise (AFOSR MURI Award No. FA9550-12-1-0488) and Samsung
ratio. Whereas atoms need to be cooled down to micro- Electronics.
nano Kelvin, solid-state emitters work well at a tempera-
ture of ~4 K. Recently, defects in hexagonal boron nitride
has shown good quantum yield with narrower linewidth References
at room temperature [61] and quantum emission from
these defects has emerged as a new candidate for solid- [1] Pendry JB, Holden AJ, Stewart WJ, Youngs II. Extremely low
state quantum optics. Engineering the quantum vacuum frequency plasmons in metallic mesostructures. Phys Rev Lett
could enable a quantum process that is forbidden in free 1996;76:4773–6.
space and open new opportunities at single photon level [2] Pendry JB, Holden AJ, Robbins DJ, Stewart WJ. Magnetism from
conductors and enhanced nonlinear phenomena. IEEE Trans
with application from fundamental physics to quantum
Microw Theory Techn 1999;47:2075–84.
technologies. [3] Veselago VG. The electrodynamics of substances with
simultaneously negative values of ε and μ. Sov Phys Uspekhi
1968;10:509–14.
[4] Pendry JB. Negative refraction makes a perfect lens. Phys Rev
6 Conclusion and perspective Lett 2000;85:3966–9.
[5] Fang N, Lee H, Sun C, Zhang X. Sub-diffraction-limited
In the recent years, metasurface research has grown tre- optical imaging with a silver superlens. Science
mendously from experiments demonstrating rich physics 2005;308:534–7.
[6] Schurig D, Mock JJ, Justice BJ, et al. Metamaterial
to enormous potentials for technological advancements.
electromagnetic cloak at microwave frequencies. Science
We have demonstrated an invisibility cloak for visible 2006;314:977–80.
light that is only a few tens of nanometers thick. The [7] Holloway CL, Kuester EF, Gordon JA, O’Hara J, Booth J, SmithDR.
ultrathin skin cloak is fully scalable and has no size limita- An overview of the theory and applications of metasurfaces:
tions. We expect that, with the development of large-scale the two-dimensional equivalents of metamaterials. IEEE Anten-
nas Propag Mag 2012;54:10–35.
nanofabrication, macroscopic metasurface skin cloak
[8] Kildishev AV, Boltasseva A, Shalaev VM. Planar photonics with
will 1 day come to practice. In addition to application metasurface. Science 2013;339:1232009.
achievement, we are also interested in developing new [9] Yu N, Genevet P, Aieta F, et al. Flat optics: controlling wave-
design principles of metasurfaces beyond the phase gra- fronts with optical antenna metasurfaces. IEEE J Sel Top Quant
dient regime. Instead of assuming negligible interactions Electron 2013;19:4700423.
between meta-atoms, we have shown that the coupling [10] Yu N, Capasso F. Flat optics with designer metasurfaces. Nat
Mater 2014;13:139.
can be used to manipulate light at the deep subwave-
[11] Yu N, Genevet P, Kats MA, et al. Light propagation with phase
length scale. Observed phenomena such as enhanced discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction.
quality factor and reduced detrimental crosstalk could be Science 2011;334:333–7.
very useful when designing metasurface with very small [12] Ni X, Emani NK, Kildishev AV, Boltasseva A, Shalaev VM. Broad-
pixel size and closely spaced resonators. Moreover, we band light bending with plasmonic nanoantennas. Science
2012;335:427.
are interested in using metasurfaces to study the funda-
[13] Pors A, Albrektsen O, Radko IP, Bozhevolnyi SI. Gap plasmon-
mental properties of light or light-matter interactions. By based metasurfaces for total control of reflected light. Sci Rep
fabricating a metasurface with rapid phase gradient, we 2013;3:2155.
have demonstrated strong PSHE, which is otherwise hard [14] Hasman E, Kleiner V, Biener G, Niv A. Polarization dependent
to observe in nature. Metasurfaces can also be applied in focusing lens by use of quantized Pancharatnam-Berry phase
quantum physics studies. Using metasurfaces to engineer diffractive optics. Appl Phys Lett 2003;82:328–30.
[15] Decker M, Staude I, Falkner M, et al. High-efficiency dielectric
vacuum properties at the far field, we theoretical showed
Huygens’ surfaces. Adv Opt Mater 2015;3:813–20.
that strong quantum interference could be induced in a [16] Khorasaninejad M, Chen WT, Devlin RC, Oh J, Zhu AY,
three-level atom. Due to the their great design flexibility Capasso F. Metalenses at visible wavelengths: diffraction-
limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging. Sci- [41] Liu R, Ji C, Mock JJ, Chin JY, Cui TJ, Smith DR. Broadband ground-
ence 2016;352:1190–4. plane cloak. Science 2009;323:366–9.
[17] Lin D, Fan P, Hasman E, Brongersma ML. Dielectric gradient [42] Gharghi M, Gladden C, Zentgraf T, et al. A carpet cloak for vis-
metasurface optical elements. Science 2014;345:298–302. ible light. Nano Lett 2011;11:2825–8.
[18] Ni X, Kildishev AV, Shalaev VM. Metasurface holograms for vis- [43] Hsu LY, Lepetit T, Kante B. Extremely thin dielectric
ible light. Nat Commun 2013;4:2807. metasurface for carpet cloaking. Prog Electromagn Res
[19] Zheng G, Mühlenbernd H, Kenney M, Li G, Zentgraf T, Zhang 2015;152:33–40.
S. Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency. Nat Nano [44] Orazbayev B, Estakhri NM, Alù A, Beruete M. Experimental
2015;10:308–12. demonstration of metasurface-based ultrathin carpet cloak for
[20] Maguid E, Yulevich I, Veksler D, Kleiner V, Brongersma ML, millimetre waves. Adv Opt Mater 2016;5:1600606.
Hasman E. Photonic spin-controlled multifunctional shared- [45] Estakhri NM, Alù A. Ultra-thin unidirectional carpet cloak and
aperture antenna array. Science 2016;352:1202–6. wavefront reconstruction with graded metasurfaces. IEEE
[21] Yin X, Ye Z, Rho J, Wang Y, Zhang X. Photonic spin Hall effect at Antennas Wireless Propag Lett Spec Cluster Transform Electro-
metasurfaces. Science 2013;339:1405–7. magn 2014;13:1775–8.
[22] Ni X, Wong ZJ, Mrejen M, Wang Y, Zhang X. An ultrathin invis- [46] Novotny L, Hecht B. Principles of nano-optics. Cambridge,
ibility skin cloak for visible light. Science 2015;349:1310–4. England: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
[23] Jha PK, Ni X, Wu C, Wang Y, Zhang X. Metasurface-enabled [47] Agarwal GS. Quantum statistical theories of spontaneous
remote quantum interference. Phys Rev Lett 2015;115:025501. emission and their relation to other approaches. In: Hohler G.,
[24] Jha PK, Shitrit N, Kim J, Ren X, Wang Y, Zhang X. Metasurface- ed. Springer tracts in modern physics: quantum optics. Vol. 70,
mediated quantum entanglement. ACS Photon 2018;5:971–6. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1974.
[25] Zhang S, Ye Z, Wang Y, et al. Anti-Hermitian plasmon coupling [48] Agarwal GS. Anisotropic vacuum-induced interference in decay
of an array of gold thin-film antennas for controlling light at the channels. Phys Rev Lett 2000;84:5500–3.
nanoscale. Phys Rev Lett 2012;109:193902. [49] Vassilios Y, Paspalakis E, Vitanov NV. Plasmon-induced
[26] Okolowicz J, Ploszajczak M, Rotter I. Dynamics of quantum sys- enhancement of quantum interference near metallic nanostruc-
tems embedded in a continuum. Phys Rep 2003;374:271–383. tures. Phys Rev Lett 2009;103:063602.
[27] Liu N, Langguth L, Weiss T, et al. Plasmonic analogue of elec- [50] Li G, Li F, Zhu S. Quantum interference between decay channels
tromagnetically induced transparency at the Drude damping of a three-level atom in a multilayer dielectric medium. Phys
limit. Nat Mater 2009;8:758–62. Rev A 2001;64:013819.
[28] Zhang S, Genov DA, Wang Y, Liu M, Zhang X. Plasmon- [51] Jha, PK. Using quantum coherence to enhance gain in atomic
induced transparency in metamaterials. Phys Rev Lett physics. Coherent Opt Phenom 2013;1:25–41.
2008;101:047401. [52] Jha PK, Mrejen M, Kim J, et al. Coherence-driven topo-
[29] Jha PK, Mrejen M, Kim J, et al. Interacting dark resonances with logical transition in quantum metamaterials. Phys Rev Lett
plasmonic meta-molecules. Appl Phys Lett 2014;105:111109. 2016;116:165502.
[30] Zelevinsky V. Quantum physics volume 1: from basics to sym- [53] Ramezani H, Jha PK, Wang Y, Zhang X. Nonreciprocal localiza-
metries and perturbations. Weinheim, Wiley-VCH; Verlag GmbH tion of photons. Phys Rev Lett 2018;120:043901.
& Co. KGaA, 2011, 551. [54] Tsakmakidis KL, Jha PK, Wang Y, Zhang X. Quantum coherence-
[31] Soshin C, Graham CD. Physics of ferromagnetism. 2nd ed. Vol. driven self-organized criticality and nonequilibrium light
94. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press on Demand, 2009. localization. Sci Adv 2018;4:eaaq0465.
[32] Bernevig BA, Yu X, Zhang SC. Maxwell equation for coupled [55] Dorfman KE, Jha PK, Voronine DV, Genevet P, Capasso F,
spin-charge wave propagation. Phys Rev Lett 2005;95:076602. Scully MO. Quantum-coherence-enhanced surface plasmon
[33] Gorodetski Y, Bliokh KY, Stein B, et al. Weak measure- emission by stimulated emission of radiation. Phys Rev Lett
ments of light chirality with a plasmonic slit. Phys Rev Lett 2013;111:043601.
2012;109:013901. [56] Gonzalez-Tudela A, Martin-Cano D, Moreno E, Martin-Moreno
[34] Alù A. Mantle cloak: Invisibility induced by a surface. Phys Rev L, Tejedor C, Garcia-Vidal FJ. Entanglement of two qubits medi-
B 2009;80:245115. ated by one-dimensional plasmonic waveguides. Phys Rev Lett
[35] Fan P, Chettiar UK, Cao L, Afshinmanesh F, Engheta N, Brong- 2011;106:020501.
ersma ML. An invisible metal-semiconductor photodetector. [57] Nerkararyan KV, Bozhevolnyi SI. Entanglement of two
Nat Photon 2012;6:380–5. qubits mediated by a localized surface plasmon. Phys Rev B
[36] Pendry JB, Schurig D, Smith DR. Controlling electromagnetic 2015;92:045410.
fields. Science 2006;312:1780–2. [58] Goban, A, Hung C-L, Hood JD, et al. Superradiance for atoms
[37] Leonhardt U. Optical conformal mapping. Science trapped along a photonic crystal waveguide. Phys Rev Lett
2006;312:1777–80. 2015;115:063601.
[38] Sanchis L, García-Chocano VM, Llopis-Pontiveros R, et al. [59] Hagley E, Maître X, Nogues G, et al. Generation of
Three-dimensional axisymmetric cloak based on the cancel- Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pairs of atoms. Phys Rev Lett
lation of acoustic scattering from a sphere. Phys Rev Lett 1997;79:1–5.
2013;110:124301. [60] Bloch I. Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices. Nat Phys
[39] Zhang S, Genov DA, Sun C, Zhang X. Cloaking of matter waves. 2005;1:23–30.
Phys Rev Lett 2008;100:123002. [61] Tran TT, Bray K, Ford MJ, Toth M, Aharonovich I. Quantum
[40] Li J, Pendry JB. Hiding under the carpet: a new strategy for emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers. Nat Nano
cloaking. Phys Rev Lett 2008;101:203901. 2016;11:37–41.