0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views11 pages

Shipbuilding Scantling and Framing Guide

The document discusses the design and calculation of scantlings in shipbuilding, focusing on the midship section's structural integrity and the various framing systems used. It details the calculations for different plating thicknesses, including bottom shell, side shell, and deck structures, based on DNV-GL rules. Additionally, it specifies the dimensions for main frames, web frames, and deck beams to ensure the ship can withstand operational loads.

Uploaded by

maherniger99
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views11 pages

Shipbuilding Scantling and Framing Guide

The document discusses the design and calculation of scantlings in shipbuilding, focusing on the midship section's structural integrity and the various framing systems used. It details the calculations for different plating thicknesses, including bottom shell, side shell, and deck structures, based on DNV-GL rules. Additionally, it specifies the dimensions for main frames, web frames, and deck beams to ensure the ship can withstand operational loads.

Uploaded by

maherniger99
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Introduction

In shipbuilding, the scantling refers to the collective dimensions of the framing (apart
from the keel) to which planks or plates are attached to form a hull. The structure’s dimensions
and the plate thickness is determined to withstand the load that is going to apply on the vessel
during operation. The design is one of the key part because midship represents the structural
integrity of a ship, the longitudinal strength of hull girder depends on the section modulus of that
element. Either the ship can withstand the cyclic load of waves or not, it depends greatly at the
construction of the middle portion of their hull.

Basically, midship drawing is the cross section of a ship’s amidships that represents main frames,
web frames, keelsons, girder, longitudinals, holes, brackets etc. The design helps in the
production sector in order to construct a block. Also, in times of tender, choosing right material
is important.

Midship Elements Dimensions are found by using DNV-GL rulebook, a Norwegian and
German Based Classification Society.

Framing System

There are three types of framing systems that are considered in ship building.

• Transverse framing system


• Longitudinal framing system
• Combined framing system

Generally, for larger ships, Longitudinal Framing is preferred by the designers. Since the length
overall of our ship is 71.5m, the adopted framing system for the assigned project is Longitudinal
framing system.

Scantling Calculation

Bottom Shell Plating: [Ref: Chapter 01, section 6, Paragraph B, Page (6-2)]
The thickness 𝑡𝐵 of the bottom shell plating is not to be less than determined by the following
formula:
𝑡𝐵= max [𝑡𝐵1,𝑡𝐵2]

𝑡𝐵1 = 1.9 ×𝑛𝑓 × a × √PB . k + 𝑡𝑘 [mm]

𝑡𝐵1 = 1.21 × a × √PB . k + 𝑡𝑘 [mm]

Where,
𝑛𝑓 = factor to take the framing system into account
𝑛𝑓 = 0.83 [for longitudinal framing]

𝑃𝐵 = Load on bottom
= 10T + 𝑃𝑜. 𝐶𝐹 kN/𝑚2 [Ref: Chapter 01, section 4, Paragraph B5, Page (4-5)]

Where,
T= draft
𝑃𝑜= Basic external dynamic load for wave direction with or against ship
𝑃𝑜= 2.1 (𝐶𝐵+ 0.7) 𝐶𝑜. 𝐶𝐿. f [Ref: Chapter 01, section 4, Paragraph A3(Symbols), Page (4-2)]
Where,
𝐶𝐵 = Block co-efficient

𝐶𝑜 = Wave co-efficient

Now we know,
Wave co-efficient [Ref: Chapter 01, section 4, Paragraph A3(Symbols), Page (4-3)]

𝐿
CO =[ 25 + 4.1]×CRW for L<90 m

69.05
=[ + 4.1]×0.6 CRW = for restricted service area RSA (SW)
25

=4.117 = 0.6

𝐿 69.05
Length Co-efficient, 𝑪𝑳 = √90 = √ = 0.876
90

Probability factor, f = 1 [Ref: Chapter 01, section 4, Paragraph A3(Symbols), Page (4-2,3)]

Material Factor, K = 1.0

Distribution factor, 𝐶𝐹= 1.0

𝑃𝑜= 2.1 (𝐶𝐵+ 0.7) 𝐶𝑜. 𝐶𝐿. 𝑓


= 2.1 × (0.76 + 0.7) × 4.117 ×0.876× 1.0
= 11.06 kN/𝑚2
𝑃𝐵= 10 T + 𝑃𝑜. 𝐶𝐹
= (10× 3 .34) + (11.06×1)
= 44.46 kN/𝑚2
Now,

𝑇𝑘 = Corrosion addition = 1.5

𝑡𝐵1 = 1.9 ×𝑛𝑓 × a × √PB . k + 𝑡𝑘 [mm]

= 1.9 × 0.83× 0.6 ×√44.46 × 1 + 1.5 mm

= 9.1 mm

𝑡𝐵2 = 1.21 × a × √PB . k + 𝑡𝑘 [mm]

= 1.21 × 0.6 × √44.46 × 1 + 1.5 mm


= 6.080 mm
Since the value of 𝑡𝐵1 > 𝑡𝐵2 we take the thickness of Bottom Shell Plating 9.5 mm

7.3.2 Inner Bottom Shell Plating:

t = 1.1 × a ×√p. k + tk

=1.1 × 0.6 × √38.50 × 1 +1.5


=5.59 mm
Therefore, we take the thickness of Inner Bottom Shell Plating 6 mm

Flat keel Plating:


The thickness 𝑡𝐹𝐾 of the Flat keel Plating is not to be less than determined by the following
formula:
𝑡𝐹𝐾 = 𝑡𝐵1 + 2.0 [Ref: Chapter 01, section 6, Paragraph B.4.1, Page (6-4)]
= 9.1 + 2.0 mm
= 11.1 mm
Therefore, we take the thickness of Flat Keel plating 11.5 mm
Bilge Plating:
Bilge Plating is considered to be taken same as flat keel plating.
Therefore, we take the thickness of Bilge plating 11.5 mm.

Side Shell Plating: [Ref: Chapter 01, section 6, Paragraph C, Page (6-4)]

The thickness 𝑡𝑠 of the bottom shell plating is not to be less than determined by the following
formula:
𝑡𝑠= max [𝑡𝑠1,𝑡𝑠2]

𝑡𝑠1 = 1.9 ×𝑛𝑓 × a × √Ps . k + 𝑡𝑘 [mm]

𝑡𝑠2 = 1.21×a ×√Ps . k + 𝑡𝑘 [mm]

𝑃𝑠 = Load on Ship’s Side [Ref: Chapter 01, section 4, Paragraph B.2, Page (4-5)]
20
= Po. Cf . 10+𝑧−𝑇 kN/𝑚2
20
= 11.06. 1. 10+1.775−3.34 Where Z=1.775

= 26.22 kN/𝑚2
Now,
𝑡𝑠1 = 1.9 ×𝑛𝑓 × a × √Ps . k + 𝑡𝑘 [mm]

[Ref: Chapter 01, section 6, Paragraph C, Page (6-4)]

=1.9 × 1 × 0.6 × √26.22 × 1 + 1.5


= 7.74 mm
𝑡𝑠2 = 1.21×a ×√Ps . k + 𝑡𝑘 [mm]
[Ref: Chapter 01, section 6, Paragraph C, Page (6-4)]
= 1.21× 0.6 ×√26.22 × 1 + 1.5 [mm]
= 5.52 mm
Therefore, we take the thickness of Side Shell plating 𝒕𝒔 7.5 mm.

Inner Shell Plate Thickness: (Ref: Chapter 01,Section 11,Paragraph B1,Page 11-2)
The inner shell can be considered as a bulkhead. So, the thickness t of the bulkhead (Inner Shell)
plating is not to be less than determined by the following formula:
cp= 0.9 √f Here, cp = Coefficient of plating

= 0.9 × √1 f = material factor


= 0.9
p = 9.81 × h p = design pressure (kN/𝑚2)
= 9.81 × 3.925
= 38.50 kN/𝑚2
h= distance [m] from the load centre of structure to a point 1 m above the bulkhead deck at
the ship's side

t = cp × a × √p +tk

= 0.9 × 0.6 ×√38.50 + 1.5


= 4.85 mm
Therefore, we take the thickness of Inner Side Shell plating 𝒕 5 mm.

Tween Deck: (Ref: Chapter 01,Section 7,Paragraph C1,Page 7-6)

The thickness 𝑡min of the tween deck is not to be less than determined by the following
formula:

tmin = 5.5 + 0.02 × L200 × √𝑘


= 5.5 + 0.02 × 69.05 × √1
= 6.88 mm
Therefore, we take the thickness of Tween Deck 𝒕min 1190×7 mm.

Main Deck Thickness: (Ref: Chapter 01,Section 7,Paragraph B.[Link],Page 7-6)

The thickness t of the main deck within 0.4 L amidships outside line of hatchways is not to
be less than determined by the following formula:
tmin = 4.5 + 0.05 × L200 × √𝑘
= 4.5 + 0.05 × 69.05 × √1
= 7.95 mm
Therefore, we take the thickness of Main Deck 𝒕min 8 mm.
Sheer Strake: [Ref: Chapter 01, section 6, Paragraph C.3.1, Page (6-5)]

The width, b of the Sheer Strake is not to be less than determined by the following formula:
B = 800 + 5L mm [ b ≤ 𝑏𝑚𝑎𝑥=1800 mm]
= 800 +5×69.05
= 1145.3 mm
Therefore, we take the width of Sheer Strake B 1200 mm.

The thickness ‘t’ of the sheer strake is not to be less than determined by the following
formula:

t = (𝑡𝐷 + 𝑡𝑠) × 0.5 mm [Ref: Chapter 01, section 6, Paragraph C.3.2, Page (6-5)]
= (7.95 + 7.34) × 0.5
= 7.64 mm
where,

𝑡𝑠 = required thickness of side shell= 7.34 mm


𝑡𝐷= required thickness of strength Deck= 7.95 mm

Therefore, we take the thickness of Sheer Strake t 8 mm.

Deck Stringer: (Ref: Chapter 01,Section 7,Paragraph B.4.2.2,Page 7-6)


If the thickness of the strength deck plating is less than that of the side shell plating, a stringer
plate is to be fitted having the width of the sheer strake and the thickness of the side shell plating.

Therefore, we take the thickness of Deck Stringer t 7.5 mm.

Hatch Coaming:
Double Bottom Height = 1 m
Height of two tier = 5.2 m
Coaming Height = Double Bottom Height + Height of two tier - Depth
= 1+5.2-4.7
= 1.5 m
𝐿300
tmin= 6 + 100 + tk
69.05
=6+ + 1.5
100

= 8.19 mm
Therefore, we take the thickness of Hatch Coaming t min 8.5 mm.

Section modulus for Main frame: (Ref: Chapter 01,Section 9,Paragraph B.2.1,Page9-2)
The section modulus WR of the main frames including end attachments are not to be less than
determined by the following formula:

WR= n. mk3. (1-ma2). mc. a. l2. p. k [cm3]


Here,
n= 0.9- (0.0035×69.05) = 0.66
𝑙𝑘𝑢 𝑙
mk3 = 1- ( +0.4 𝑘𝑜 )
𝑙 𝑙
0.5 0.5
= 1 – ( 3.7 + 0.43.7 )

= 0.81 m
𝑎 𝑎
ma = 0.201× 𝑙 ×(4 - ( 𝑙 )2 )
0.6 0.6
= 0.201×3.7×(4 - (3.7)2)

= 0.13 m
WR= n. mk3. (1-ma2). mc. a. l2. p. k [cm3]
= 0.66×0.81×(1-0.132)×0.75×0.6×3.72×26.22×1
= 84.76 cm3
Therefore, we take the dimension of Main Frame L-80×80×9 mm.

Section modulus for Web frame: (Ref: Chapter 01,Section 9,Paragraph B.5.3.1,Page9-2)
Where web frames and supporting stringers are fitted instead of tiers of beams, their section
modulus W to be determined by the following formula:

W= 0.55. e. l2. p. nc. k [cm3]


= 0.55× 1.65× 3.72× 26.22× 1× 1
= 325.71 cm3
Therefore, we take the dimension of Web Frame T-250×100×7 mm.

Deck Beam: (Ref: Chapter 01, Section 10, Paragraph B.1.1, Page 10-2)
The section modulus Wd and shear area Ad of transverse deck beams and of deck longitudinals
not contributing to the longitudinal strength are to be not less than determined by the following
formula:
Wd = c. (m2k1-m2a). a. l2. p. k [cm3]

𝑙𝐾𝐼 −𝑙𝐾𝑗
mk1 = 1-
103 .𝑙

1
lKI = hs + 0.3hb + 𝑐
1

= 0.2 + 0.3×0.25 + 0
= 0.275
lKJ = hs + lb
= 0.2 + 1.2
= 1.2

0.275−1.2
mk1 = 1-
103 ×3.7

= 0.99

Wd = c. (m2k1-m2a). a. l2. p. k
= 0.75× (0.992-0.132)× 0.6× 3.72× 26.22× 1
= 112.74 cm3

Therefore, we take the dimension of Deck Beam T-100×100×10 mm.


Deck Girder: (Ref: Chapter 01, Section 10, Paragraph B.2.2.1, Page 10-3)
The section modulus W not to be less than determined by the following formula:

W = c. e. l2. p. k [cm3]
= 0.75×1.65×3.72× 18.63× 1
= 315.63 cm3
Therefore, we take the dimension of Deck Girder T-250×6 +100×8 mm

Deck Longitudinal: [Ref: Chapter 01, section 09, Paragraph C.3.2, Page (9-8)]

The section modulus 𝑊𝐿 of longitudinal and longitudinal beams of strength deck is


determined bythe following formulae:

83
𝑊𝐿= σ × (𝑚2𝑘𝐼-𝑚2𝑎) × a × 𝑙2× p [cm3]
pr

𝜎𝑝𝑟= Permissible local stress [ kN/𝑚2]


=𝜎𝑝𝑒𝑟m - |𝜎𝐿|
𝜎𝐿=30= Longitudinal bending stress
L 230
𝜎𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚 = (0.8+ 450) × 𝐾
69.05 230
= (0.8 + )×
450 1

= 219.29
𝜎𝑝𝑟=𝜎𝑝𝑒𝑟m – |𝜎𝐿|
= 219.29 – 30
= 189.29
83
𝑊𝐿= σ × (𝑚2𝑘𝐼-𝑚2𝑎) × a × 𝑙2× p [cm3]
pr

83
= 189.29 ×(0.992-0.132 ) × 0.6 × 3.72 × 18.63

= 65.91 cm3
Therefore, we take the dimension of Deck Longitudinal L-80×80×8 mm
Bottom Longitudinal:
The section modulus of bottom longitudinal should not be less than

83.3
𝑊𝐵𝐿 = × (𝑚2𝑘𝐼-𝑚2𝑎) × a × 𝑙2× 𝑃𝐵 [cm3]
σpr

83
=189.29 × (0.992-0.132 ) × 0.6 × 3.72 × 44.46

= 157.85 cm3
Therefore, we take the dimension of Bottom Longitudinal L-100×100×12 mm

Side Longitudinal: [Ref: Chapter 01, section 09, Paragraph C.3.3, Page (9-8)]
The section modulus of side longitudinal should not be less than

83.3
𝑊S𝐿 = × (𝑚2𝑘𝐼-𝑚2𝑎) × a × 𝑙2× 𝑃S [cm3]
σpr

83
= 189.29 × (0.992-0.132 ) × 0.6 × 3.72 × 26.22

= 93.08 cm3
Therefore, we take the dimension of Side Longitudinal L-90×90×9 mm

Center Girder:
The web thickness within 0.7L amid-ship are not be less than determined by the following
formula:
𝑡𝑤= 0.07L + 5.5 mm
= 0.07×69.05 + 5.5
= 10.33 mm
𝐴𝑓 = 0.07L + 12 𝑐𝑚2
= 0.07×69.05 + 12
= 16.83 𝑐𝑚2
Therefore, we take the dimension of Centre Girder I-1000×10.5 mm
Summary Table of Midship Scantling

Stiffening Members Dimensions [mm]


Center Keelson I - 1000x10.5
Side Keelson I - 1000x8
Bottom Longitudinal L - 100x100x12
Side shell Longitudinal L - 90x90x9
Deck Longitudinals L - 80x80x8
Webframe T - 250x100x7
Mainframe L - 80x80x10
Deck Beam L - 80x80x8
FB Stiffener 75x8
Twin Deck Longitudinals L - 80x80x8

Plate Width [mm] Thickness [mm]


Keel Plate 1200 11.5
Bottom Plate 2000 9.5
Bilge Plate 1200 9.5
Side Shell Plating 2000 7.5
Shear Strake Plating 1200 8
Deck Stringer 1200 7.5
Inner Shell Plating 2000 5
Inner Bottom Plating 2000 6
Tween Deck 1190 7
Hatch Coaming 1000 8
Bulwark 1000 8.5

Common questions

Powered by AI

The section modulus is a critical factor in determining the longitudinal strength of a ship's hull girder because it measures the distribution of a ship's cross-sectional area relative to its neutral axis. This determines the hull's ability to withstand longitudinal loads and bending moments. The integrity and cyclic load resistance, especially in rough sea conditions, are largely dependent on an adequately sized section modulus that assures structural stability and prevents failures .

Calculating the center girder's web thickness within 0.7L amidship is important because this region endures significant flexural and shear stresses due to its central location in the hull. This calculation ensures that the girder provides sufficient resistance to these forces, supporting the overall structural integrity of the midship section. The formula used to determine this thickness considers the ship's length and the expected load distribution, ensuring the girder can adequately handle operational pressures .

Design pressure influences the thickness of the inner shell plating by dictating the structural capacity needed to withstand internal forces from cargo and external marine pressures. Increased design pressure necessitates thicker plating to provide adequate strength and prevent failures. The correct thickness is established using a formula that factors in the design pressure, a plating coefficient, and a material factor, ensuring that the bulkhead can support both active and passive loads. This element is crucial as it protects against breaches that could compromise the vessel's buoyancy and operational integrity .

Web frames and supporting stringers replace tiers of beams by enabling a more continuous support structure that distributes loads more efficiently along the ship's length. In this context, the section modulus of such structures determines their capacity to resist bending moments and shear forces, ensuring the structural integrity of the hull. The formula for section modulus incorporates aspects like load application points and length parameters, which are essential for assessing the frames' and stringers' ability to support the ship’s full operational load without failure .

The choice of material for the midship section is significant because the midship area is critical for the ship's overall structural integrity. This section experiences the most intense stresses and loads due to its size and position. Using materials with inadequate properties could lead to structural failures under operational stresses, compromising the vessel’s safety and serviceability. Selecting the right material ensures the section modulus and other structural characteristics meet the necessary standards, which is paramount for withstanding cyclic loads and maintaining the ship's longevity and safety .

The longitudinal framing system differs from the transverse framing system mainly in the orientation of its structural elements: longitudinal framing involves frames running parallel to the ship's length, while transverse framing involves frames running horizontally across. Longitudinal framing is preferred for larger ships because it enhances the longitudinal strength of the hull, allowing it to better withstand wave-induced loads and stresses, which are critical for the vessel's stability and structural integrity during operations .

The DNV-GL rulebook provides a comprehensive set of guidelines and standards for determining the scantling dimensions of a ship’s structure. It ensures that the vessel's hull and frame components are designed to withstand the operational stresses and environmental conditions they will encounter. By adhering to these standards, shipbuilders can ensure compliance with international safety regulations, enhance the ship's durability, and optimize material usage to achieve economic efficiency while maintaining safety .

When calculating the thickness of bottom shell plating, several factors must be considered: the framing system factor (nf), the load on the bottom (PB), the ship's draught (T), the basic external dynamic load (Po), the wave coefficient (Co), the block coefficient (CB), the length coefficient (CL), and the material factor (K). Additionally, a corrosion addition (Tk) is also included to account for degradation over time. These elements are integrated into a formula to determine the adequate thickness needed to ensure structural integrity and compliance with safety standards .

The calculation of side shell plating thickness involves different loading considerations than bottom shell plating. For side shell plating, the primary load is the hydrostatic pressure experienced along the sides of the ship when navigating through water. The formula incorporates a distribution factor (CF), a load factor (Ps) derived from basic external dynamic loads, and an adjusted load distribution reflecting the ship’s varying operational depths and design pressures. These factors differ from the bottom shell’s focus on vertical pressure and are crucial for ensuring lateral stability and integrity .

Sheer strakes contribute significantly to the structural integrity of a ship by acting as a critical reinforcement at the ship's hull/superstructure interface. Their placement and size help distribute stress and maintain structural rigidity, especially for longitudinal strength. The thickness of sheer strakes is determined by averaging the required thickness of the strength deck and side shell plating, ensuring they meet or exceed both structural and durability criteria .

You might also like