0% found this document useful (0 votes)
143 views3 pages

Salesforce Interview DSA Questions

This document provides a comprehensive list of frequently asked DSA questions in Salesforce interviews, aimed at helping candidates prepare for technical rounds. It includes links to specific problems on LeetCode, covering a wide range of topics and patterns relevant to Salesforce. Additionally, it suggests pairing this resource with LeetCode contests and mentions a YouTube channel for further learning.

Uploaded by

sayan20dutta04
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
143 views3 pages

Salesforce Interview DSA Questions

This document provides a comprehensive list of frequently asked DSA questions in Salesforce interviews, aimed at helping candidates prepare for technical rounds. It includes links to specific problems on LeetCode, covering a wide range of topics and patterns relevant to Salesforce. Additionally, it suggests pairing this resource with LeetCode contests and mentions a YouTube channel for further learning.

Uploaded by

sayan20dutta04
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Introduction

This sheet contains frequently asked DSA questions in Salesforce interviews and is a must-have for
cracking their technical rounds. Use it to master key patterns and topics Salesforce focuses on.

💡 Tip: Pair this with regular participation in LeetCode contests to enhance your problem-solving skills.
For more resources, check out my YouTube channel: [Link]/@shivamlucknowi. 🚀
Shivam Chaudhary

Most Frequently Asked Questions in Salesforce

1. LRU Cache → [Link]


2. Reaching Points → [Link]
3. Letter Combinations of a Phone Number →
[Link]
4. Merge Intervals → [Link]
5. K-diff Pairs in an Array → [Link]
6. Design HashMap → [Link]
7. Find the Smallest Divisor Given a Threshold →
[Link]
8. LFU Cache → [Link]
9. Implement Queue using Stacks →
[Link]
10. Design Search Autocomplete System →
[Link]
11. Maximum Frequency Stack →
[Link]
12. The Skyline Problem → [Link]
13. Flatten 2D Vector → [Link]
14. Two Sum → [Link]
15. Remove Duplicates from Sorted List II →
[Link]
16. Design Tic-Tac-Toe → [Link]
17. Shuffle an Array → [Link]
18. Word Ladder → [Link]
19. Largest Number → [Link]
20. Number of Islands → [Link]
21. Trapping Rain Water → [Link]
22. Valid Parentheses → [Link]
23. Find the Duplicate Number → [Link]
24. Merge k Sorted Lists → [Link]
25. Design Snake Game → [Link]
26. Insert Delete GetRandom O(1) →
[Link]
27. Lowest Common Ancestor of a Binary Tree →
[Link]
28. Remove Duplicates from Sorted List →
[Link]
29. Reverse Words in a String → [Link]
30. Decode String → [Link]
31. Longest Increasing Subsequence →
[Link]
32. Group Anagrams → [Link]
33. Isomorphic Strings → [Link]
34. Find Minimum in Rotated Sorted Array →
[Link]
35. Rotate Image → [Link]
36. 3Sum → [Link]
37. First Missing Positive → [Link]
38. Search in Rotated Sorted Array →
[Link]
39. Word Search II → [Link]
40. Generate Parentheses → [Link]
41. Find Pivot Index → [Link]
42. Search a 2D Matrix II → [Link]
43. Candy → [Link]
44. Top K Frequent Words → [Link]
45. Serialize and Deserialize Binary Tree →
[Link]
46. Validate Binary Search Tree →
[Link]
47. Permutations → [Link]
48. Minimum Window Substring →
[Link]
49. Kth Largest Element in an Array →
[Link]
50. Add and Search Word - Data structure design →
[Link]
51. Invert Binary Tree → [Link]
52. Find Median from Data Stream →
[Link]
53. Course Schedule → [Link]
54. Maximum Subarray → [Link]
55. Binary Tree Vertical Order Traversal →
[Link]
56. Simplify Path → [Link]
57. Fizz Buzz → [Link]
58. Product of Array Except Self →
[Link]
59. Word Break → [Link]
60. Add Two Numbers → [Link]
61. Reverse Words in a String III →
[Link]
62. Symmetric Tree → [Link]
63. Friend Circles → [Link]
64. Integer to Roman → [Link]
65. Valid Sudoku → [Link]
66. Set Matrix Zeroes → [Link]
67. Longest Substring Without Repeating Characters →
[Link]
68. Intersection of Two Arrays II →
[Link]
69. Check If a Number Is Majority Element in a Sorted Array →
[Link]
70. Height Checker → [Link]
71. 3Sum Closest → [Link]

72. Asteroid Collision → [Link]


73. Next Smallest Palindrome
→[Link]
-number/
74. Aggressive Cows : [Link]
75. Product 1 Modulo N : [Link]

Common questions

Powered by AI

In the Number of Islands problem, the Depth-First Search (DFS) algorithm is instrumental in identifying and counting distinct islands in a grid or matrix. The main steps involved include: 1. Iterating through each cell in the grid. When a land cell ('1') is found, it is considered as part of a new island. 2. Initiating a DFS from that cell, marking it as visited while recursively marking all its connected land cells in horizontal or vertical directions. 3. Incrementing the island count for each DFS initiation. This approach is effective because DFS can comprehensively explore all parts of an individual island, modifying the grid to prevent re-counting islands .

The "Friend Circles" problem can be seen through the lens of union-find data structures by treating each friend as a node and friendships as connections that need to be united into circles. Using the union-find structure allows us to easily merge sets and find the root or representative of each set, which indicates a circle of friends. This approach benefits from almost constant time complexity per operation due to the efficient path compression and union by rank strategies, which effectively reduce the overall time taken to identify friend circles. The total complexity benefit arises from handling disjoint set operations efficiently, which would be more costly with other methods for large networks of friends .

The strategy behind using dynamic programming to solve the Longest Increasing Subsequence (LIS) problem involves breaking it down into smaller overlapping subproblems that can be solved individually and combined to form a solution for the whole problem. The reasoning is to maintain an array, where each entry at index i contains the length of the longest increasing subsequence that ends with the element at index i. For each element, iterate over previous elements and update this array if a longer increasing subsequence ending at that element is found. This approach is efficient as it reduces the time complexity from exponential to O(N^2). This dynamic programming strategy effectively handles the challenge of finding the longest subsequence in a potentially unsorted array .

The problem of designing an LRU (Least Recently Used) Cache can be efficiently solved using a combination of a doubly linked list and a hash map. The key design components involved include: 1. A doubly linked list to maintain the order of usage where the head of the list points to the most recently used item and the tail points to the least recently used item. 2. A hash map to provide constant time complexity for get and put operations. The hash map stores the key-value pairs, where each value points to the respective node in the doubly linked list. This design allows for efficient updating of the cache when entries are accessed or replaced, facilitating O(1) time complexity for both adding and removing entries .

Designing a 'Design Search Autocomplete System' presents several challenges, including efficiently handling large datasets, providing quick and accurate completions, and dynamically updating data. These can be addressed by the following strategies: 1. Using a Trie data structure to organize and retrieve data based on prefix queries efficiently. 2. Employing a min-heap or priority queue to sort suggestions based on relevance, frequency, or recency of use, ensuring top suggestions are prioritized. 3. Implementing a strategy for caching frequent queries to minimize the need for repeated computations. By combining these approaches, the system can provide fast autocomplete suggestions while handling dynamic data efficiently .

Implementing a Design HashMap requires careful considerations and trade-offs involving efficiency, storage space, collision handling, and complexity of operations. Some key considerations include: 1. Hash Function: Choosing an efficient hash function to minimize collisions, which directly affects lookup time. 2. Collision Resolution: Use techniques such as chaining or open addressing to handle collisions, with trade-offs between ease of implementation and memory allocation. 3. Load Factor and Resizing: Balancing the load factor to ensure space efficiency while maintaining optimal performance, as resizing can be computationally expensive. 4. Complexity Trade-offs: Ensuring that operations such as insert, delete, and get remain in average O(1) time complexity, requiring careful management of the aforementioned factors. Overall, a well-implemented Design HashMap will guarantee fast access times while handling potential drawbacks of collisions and resizing .

The Breadth-First Search (BFS) algorithm can be effectively utilized to solve the word ladder problem. This approach is effective because it systematically explores all possible words that can be reached from a given word by converting one letter at a time. By using BFS, we can find the shortest transformation sequence between the start word and the end word, ensuring that the path found is the minimal path required. BFS is especially suitable for this problem since it handles the exploration of layers in a manner that guarantees we find the shortest path first .

Using a priority queue, specifically a min-heap, is an effective approach for solving the Kth Largest Element in an Array problem. This method is effective because it maintains a heap of size k while iterating through the array. The priority queue ensures that the smallest element of the heap is accessible in constant time. For each element in the array, if the heap size exceeds k, the smallest element (the root of the heap) is popped from the queue. At the end of the iteration, the root of the min-heap represents the Kth largest element in the array. This approach is particularly efficient in terms of time complexity, allowing for O(NlogK) performance, which is optimal for selecting the Kth largest element without sorting the entire array .

The two-pointer technique is effectively applied in solving the 3Sum problem by following these synthesized steps: 1. First, sort the array to enable binary searching. 2. Iterate through the array, fixing one element at a time as the first element of the potential triplet. 3. Use two pointers starting immediately after the fixed element and at the end of the array for the remaining two elements. 4. Sum these three elements and move the two pointers to adjust the sum to zero; move the left pointer up if the sum is too low or move the right pointer down if the sum is too high. 5. Continue adjusting the pointers and recording valid triplets where the sum is zero. This method is powerful in reducing the complexity from O(N^3) to O(N^2), while eliminating duplicate triplets through careful pointer advancements .

The Course Scheduling problem can be solved using graph theory by modeling courses as nodes and prerequisites as directed edges between nodes. This problem translates to checking for cycles in the graph to determine if the list of courses can be completed. A topological sort, typically implemented using a Depth-First Search (DFS) or Kahn's algorithm, is employed to check for cycles. Potential complexities include handling large graphs efficiently and managing nodes with multiple dependencies. Ensuring the graph is a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) is crucial for a valid schedule. Therefore, detecting any cycles denotes that completing all courses following the given prerequisites is not possible .

You might also like