Cost Analysis for MBA Decision-Making
Cost Analysis for MBA Decision-Making
Unit cost at split-off point is Taka 30,000 ($90,000/3). Selling at split-off nets Taka 50,000. Further processing costs Taka 60 and requires Taka 7,500 fixed, giving Taka 67,500 total with additional revenue of Taka 70,000. The gain is Taka 2,500. Process further only if capacity exists .
Dropping Linens causes the loss of its contribution margin ($600,000) and fixed costs still incur $340,000. Plus, a 10% reduction in Hardware sales ($3,000,000) means a $300,000 revenue loss, reducing its contribution by $210,000 (70% margin). Net Operating Income drops by $540,000 total, decreasing profitability and suggesting retaining Linens .
Conduct a Comprehensive Cost-Volume-Profit (CVP) Analysis combined with Constraint Analysis to determine contribution margin impacts, understand fixed cost behavior via step-fixed and allocated costs, and measure opportunity cost. This ensures accurate profitability estimation and resource utilization .
The cost without special tooling and filigree per bracelet is $149. With added costs, it becomes $155 ($149 + $2 filigree cost + $250/20 unit tool cost). Selling at $154.95 results in a net loss of $0.05 per bracelet. Total loss is $1 (20 * $0.05 loss). Therefore, the order should not be accepted at this price unless strategic gains warrant .
Consider the $150,000 segment margin gain from the new product versus the $30,000 incremental cost saving from buying carburetors. Include capacity constraints, strategic fit of the new product, market conditions, fixed cost absorption, and indirect effects on brand reputation. Revenue from the new line must exceed marginal and indirect costs to justify .
Deco Engines, Ltd., should calculate the relevant costs of producing the carburetors internally versus purchasing them. The internal production cost per unit includes: Direct materials ($14), Direct labor ($10), and Variable manufacturing overhead ($3), totaling $27 per unit. Fixed manufacturing overhead ($6) is not avoidable unless there's value in alternative use. There's a $3 per unit savings if bought externally without alternative use. Therefore, purchasing from the supplier would save $3 per unit ($30,000 total). Without an alternative, they should accept the offer .
Dropping the Linens Department eliminates its $1,000,000 sales and $600,000 contribution margin, but $340,000 of its fixed expenses remain. Removing it means $200,000 loss reduces to a $540,000 net loss impact due to remaining fixed costs. Dropping the Linens Department is not recommended as it worsens Net Operating Income by $340,000 .
Product A yields $240,000 increase after processing ($60,000 net gain); Product B shows a $20,000 net loss if processed; Product C gains $52,000 from further processing. A and C should process further for a gain, while B should sell at split-off due to loss .
The basic unit cost is $149; with $6 extra, it's $155.95. Selling at $154.95 causes a $1 loss per bracelet. To breakeven, raise the price to at least $155.95 or reduce costs, without affecting capacity. Any initial investment is covered at this pricing .
By purchasing the carburetors, Deco Engines can produce a new product that yields a segment margin of $150,000. Internally, the avoided costs are the variable expenses plus the fixed supervisor's salary. The cost of buying externally is $35 per unit. The difference between making or buying ($35 - $27 = $8 saved per unit) multiplies to a $120,000/year advantage. Combined with the new product’s segment margin, accepting the offer would lead to a $150,000 increase in annual income, assuming no alternative use of the fixed overhead .