The graphic shows the layout of the ground floor of a museum between 1990 and 2010.

While the general design and entrance stairs were

remained the same, the statue was moved into the center of the area and other facilities were used for different purposes.
The noticeable lost is the archaeology gallery, in 2010 it was change into the children’s interactive zone and the poster display area. We can easily
see the local history room in the same place between 2 years, but the main focus is the wall of the latter disappeared in 2010, making it more open.
Similarly, the natural history room and museum office stayed the same, but the reception counter was enlarged and moved nearer to the extended
entrance. The gift shop was improved in size and also served coffees for visitors who are visiting the museum. There is a lift at the space between
the gift shop and the natural history room.

The graphic shows two maps of the ground floor of a museum between 1990 and 2010. While the overall design of the floor and entrance stairs
remained the same between 2 years, the other facilities were repurposed and the statue was moved to the center of the area.
On the right side of the entrance, there is a noticeable loss is that the archaeology gallery was repurposed and divided into 2 rooms: a children’s
interactive zone, a poster display area. In contrast, the local history room remained in the same place. Furthermore, the walls of those three rooms
were removed, making it more open.
Similarly, the natural history room and the museum office stayed the same. There is a significant change to the reception counter which was
enlarged and moved nearer to the entrance. Also, the entrance doubled its size compared to its 1990 state. The lift was built at the gap between the
gift shop and the natural history room, helping visitors quickly elevate to a higher floor. Additionally, the gift shop was widened and now
incorporates a café for visitors, making the museum more convenient and attractive to visitors.

The maps illustrate the different layouts of the ground level of a museum between 1990 and 2010. While the overall design and entrance stairs
remained the same, the statue was moved to the center of the area and other facilities repurposed.
On the right of the entrance, we can easily notice a significant change which the archaeology gallery disappeared and was divided into 2 rooms: a
children’s interactive zone, a poster display area. In contrast, the local history room stayed in the same place, but the walls of these three rooms
were removed, making them more open.
Similarly, the natural history room and museum office remained unchanged on the opposite side. A noticeable change is that the reception counter
was enlarged and moved closer to the entrance which also doubled its size compared to its 1990 state. Additionally, the lift was created at the gap
between the gift shop and the natural history room, helping visitors access upper floors more quickly. Also, the gift shop was widened and now
incorporates a café, making the museum more convenient and attractive to visitors.
Overall trend: utilities (electricity/water), food and drink at home
Top 1: maintain Food and drink
Increase: utilities, eating out (double)
Decrease significantly: clothing
Remain: Holidays, sports and cultural, transport (increase slightly)

The graphics show the percentage of spending on seven different categories by students, on average, at a university between 2000 and 2010. The
overall trend is that the proportion of expenditure on food and drink at home and utilities remained the two largest expenditure categories, while
the other areas were fluctuating during these two years.
While the spending on food and drink at home remained unchanged, it still held the largest figure. The utilities category increased quite significantly
by 6% to 27%. However, it still remained the second largest share. Similarly, the spending on eating out by students doubled its figure, reaching 8%.
In contrast, the percentage of expenditure on clothing decreased markedly from 16% to 5%, which was the highest loss among seven categories.
The spending on transport experienced a marginal rise by 1%. Additionally, the holidays and sports and cultural categories stayed the same as 5%
and 17% respectively in these two specific years.

The graphics show the percentage of spending by students on seven different categories, on average, at a university between 2000 and 2010. The
overall trend is that the proportion of expenditure on utilities and food and drink at home remained the two largest expenditure categories in 2000
and 2010, while the other areas were fluctuating during these two years.
Although the spending on food and drink at home remained unchanged, it still held the largest share. The utilities category still stood at the second
place, but its percentage increased quite significantly by 6% to 27%. Similarly, the expenditure on eating out doubled its share/ figure to 8%. In
contrast, the percentage of spending on clothing decreased markedly from 16% to 5%, which was the highest loss among seven categories. The
transport expenditure experienced a marginal rise by 1%, reaching 9% in 2010. Additionally, the holidays and sports and cultural categories stayed
the same as 5% and 17% respectively in these two specific years.

The graphics show the percentage of expenditure by students on seven different areas, on average, at a university between 2000 and 2010. The
overall trend is that students were spending largely on utilities (electricity/water) and food and drink at home and remained the two largest
expenditure categories through the period, while other categories were changing slightly.
Although the proportion of expenditure on food and drink (home) remained at first place, the percentage of utilities increased quite significantly
from 21% to 27%. Similarly, students spent a large amount of money on eating out, as this category doubled its percentage compared with 2000. In
contrast, the expenditure on clothing decreased noticeably by 11% to 5% in 2010. The percentage on transport saw a marginal increase of 1%,
reaching 9% in 2010. Additionally, the proportion of spending on holidays and sports and cultural remained unchanged as 5% and 17% respectively
in these two specific years.

Television: fluctuate
Printed newspaper: decrease
Radio: remain stable
Internet (any device): incease

Internet is close to television

Television: fluctuate
Printed newspaper: decrease
Internet (any device): incease

Radio: remain stable

The graphic shows the variation of methods in accessing news by the public in one country from 2013 to 2017. Overall, the percentage of people
accessing news via internet was emerging to become the second most popular medium, while the proportion of television users remained the first
place among four different media, and the two leading media were significantly bigger than the rest.
Although the figure of people watching news through television fluctuated over the four-year period, it still remained in the first position. Initially,
the percentage of internet users stood at the least popular medium, but its percentage increased noticeably by 36%, reaching 68%, and surpassed
printed newspapers and radio. Actually, its figure was only 3% lower than the proportion of television users. In contrast, the printed newspapers
users decreased markedly from 42% to 22%, dropping from the second place to the lowest position by 2017. Additionally, the percentage of people
accessing news via radio remained stable throughout the years.
The graphic shows variation of methods in accessing news by the public in one country from 2013 to 2017. Overall, the percentage of people
reading news via internet was emgering to become the second most popular medium, while the proportion of television users remained the first
place among four different media, and the two leading media were significantly higher than the rest.
Although the percentage of television users fluctuated over four-year period, it still remained the first position. Initially, the figure of people
accessing news though internet stood at the lowest popular medium, but it increased noticeably by 36%, reaching to 68%, and surpassed printed
newspapers and radio users. Actually, its percentage was only 3% lower than the figure of television users. In contrast, printed newspapers users
declined markedly from 42% to 22%, dropping from the second place to the lowest position by 2017. Additionally, the proportion of people
accessing news via radio remained stable throughout the years.

The graphic shows variation of methods in accessing news by the public in one country from 2013 to 2017. Overall, the proportion of people using
internet was emerging to become the second most popular medium, while the percentage of television users remained the first place among four
different media thoughout the years, and the two leading media were significantly bigger than the rest.
Although the figure of people watching news through television fluctuated over four-year period, it still remained the first place. Initially, the
proportion of internet users stood at the least popular medium, but it increased noticeably by 36%, reaching 68%, and surpassed printed
newspaper and radio. Actually, its percentage was only 3% lower than the figure of television users. In contrast, the proportion of people accessing
news via printed newspaper declined markedly from 42% to 22%, dropping from the second place to the lowest position by 2017. Additionally,
radio users remained stable though the years.

The graphic shows the variation of method in accessing news by people in one country from 2013 to 2017. Overall, the internet was emerging to
become the second most popular medium, while the percentage of people watching television to access news remained the first place among four
different media thoughout 5 years, and the two leading media was significantly bigger than the rest.
Although the proportion of the public accessing news through television fluctuated marginally, it still remained the first place among four different
media. Initially, the percentage of Internet users was the least popular medium, over the four-year period it increased noticeably by approximately
35%, reaching 68% and surpassed newspapers and radio. The figure of using internet to read news was only 3% lower than television in 2017. In
contrast, the proportion of people using newspaper to read news was at the second place, but it decreased significantly from 42% to 22%.
Additionally, radio remained stable throughout the years.
Compare: Age 31-45, 61-75, 76+
Fluctuate: large city residents significant
Other residents: slight difference