Differential Equations II Lecture Notes
Differential Equations II Lecture Notes
(MATH 450)
LECTURE NOTES
Math 450 : Differential Equations II J.K.A
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Definitions & Terminology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Approaches to Problems in ODE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3 Linear Systems 25
3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.2 Homogeneous Linear Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3
Math 450 : Differential Equations II J.K.A
A Lipschitz Condition 89
Introduction
1
Math 450 : Differential Equations II J.K.A
2. Are solutions stable? In order words, how does a given solution change
if the initial data is changed by a small amount?
5. Can we gain any qualitative insights? Can you derive qualitative fea-
tures of the solution without actually having a solution?
dy
= f (x, y)
dx
is said to be separable if f (x, y) can be written as the product of a
function g(x) that depends on only x and a function h(y) that depends
on only y such that
dy
= h(y)g(x) (2.1)
dx
Method of Solution
To solve
dy
= h(y)g(x), (2.2)
dx
separate variables to get
dy
= g(x)dx,
h(y)
5
Math 450 : Differential Equations II J.K.A
W need to understand the importance of the theorem and how it can be used
to analyze first order differential equations.
2) there is a unique solution to the IVP. That is, if we can find a solution,
then it is the only solution for the IVP. Uniqueness also implies that
there is only one solution curve that passes through the initial point
(t0 , x0 ). Thus, two solutions cannot cross anywhere in the rectangle.
3) the existence and uniqueness of the solution holds only in some neigh-
borhood (t0 − δ, t0 + δ). However, the theorem does not tell us the span
(2δ) of this neighborhood.
dx
= 3x2/3 , x(2) = 0.
dt
Does Theorem 1 imply the existence of a unique solution?
Solution. We have f (t, x) = 3x2/3 and ∂f /∂x = 2/x1/3 . Though the func-
tion f is continuous about the initial point (2, 0), its partial derivative ∂f /∂x
is not continuous or even defined at x = 0. So the hypotheses of Theorem 1
are not satisfied. Therefore we cannot use Theorem 1 to determine whether
the IVP has or does not have a unique solution.
Remark. Why did the problem violate the hypotheses of the theorem? First
notice that the equation can be solved via integration:
dx
= 3x2/3
dt
Z Z
−2/3
=⇒ x dx = 3dt
=⇒ 3x1/3 = 3t + C1
=⇒ x1/3 = (t + C)
=⇒ x = (t + C)3
Applying the initial condition results in the solution
x = (t − 2)3 .
Also notice that x(t) ≡ 0 is another solution to the IVP since it satisfies the
equation. So the IVP has two solutions and therefore cannot have a unique
solution as required by Theorem 1.
dx
= 3x2/3 , x(2) = 1.
dt
Does Theorem 1 imply the existence of a unique solution?
Solution. We see that the function f and its partial derivative are continu-
ous, guaranteeing the existence of a unique solution. However, we will find
that the solution does not exist for all t ∈ R.
dx
= 2tx2 , x(0) = 1,
dt Z Z
dx
= 2tdt,
x2
1
− = t2 + C,
x
1
=⇒ x(t) = , (2.5)
1 − t2
after applying the initial condition. We note that the solution blows up (goes
to infinity) as t approached ±1, therefore the solution (as in Definition 3)
only exists in the interval −1 < t < 1.
Example 7.
dx
= αx, x(t0 ) = x0 , (2.6)
dt
where α is a parameter. Separating variables, the solution is given by
Figure 2.2 displays the qualitative behaviour of the solutions. We find that
for α > 0 all nonzero solutions tend away from the equilibrium point as
t → ∞. On the other hand, for α < 0, all nonzero solutions tend toward
the equilibrium solution as t → ∞. So the sign of α plays a critical role
in determining the qualitative behaviour of the solutions. For instance, if
α > 0, we can replace α by another number with the same sign as α and the
qualitative nature of the solution does not change. However, if α = 0, then
the slightest change in α leads to a radical or drastic change in the behaviour
of solutions. Such a situation is what is called a bifurcation at α = 0 for
the family of differential equations dx/dt = αx.
The question is, suppose we do not have the solutions given by equation
(2.7), can we still obtain a sketch or plot of the qualitative behaviour of
solutions, such as those displayed in Figure 2.2? The answer is yes. We are
going to explore the qualitative behaviour of solutions using the concept of
direction fields and phase lines as described below.
Figure 2.2: (a) Solution curves from equation (2.7) for α > 0. (b) Same as
(a) but for α < 0.
Direction Field
In this section, we study how to use the direction field of a differential
equation to sketch the graphs of solutions of first order ODEs. The idea
is to obtain a qualitative view of the graph of solutions to a differential
equation without actually solving the equation. We first assume that we
have a family of solutions and calculate their direction field as outlined below.
After obtaining the direction field, we can then sketch the solutions of interest
depending on the initial condition(s).
Example 8. Sketch the direction field for equation (2.6), repeated here for
convenience:
dx
= αx.
dt
where α = 1. Hence sketch the solution satisfying the initial condition
(i) x(−2) = 0.5
Solution.
1 1
V (t, x) == =
f (t, x) x
Below are a few of the vectors corresponding to V (t, x).
1 1
V (0, 0) = , V (0, 1) =
0 1
1 1
V (−2, 1) = , V (−1, 1) =
1 1
1 1
V (0, 2) = , V (0, 3) =
2 3
1 1
V (0, 4) = , V (1, 4) =
4 4
Notice that vectors on the same horizontal line have the same slope because
f is independent of t. Figure 2.3a displays the direction field using a couple
of points. The solution curve starting from the initial point (−2, 0.5) is
shown as the red solid curve. This curve is comparable to the solution curves
shown in Figure 2.2 (left panel for x > 0), which were obtained analytically.
Similarly, we can sketch the direction field corresponding to the case when
α = −1 to get the graph in Figure 2.3b with a solution curve starting from
about (−1.6, 4.5).
Figure 2.3: (a) Direction field for equation (2.9) with α = 1. (b) Same as (a)
but for α = −1.
dx
= t 2 + x2 .
dt
Hence sketch the solutions satisfying the initial conditions
Solution.
dx
= t2 + x2 ; so f (t, x) = t2 + x2
dt
1 1
V~ (t, x) = =
f (t, x) t + x2
2
These vectors are sketched in Figure 2.4. Figure 2.5 is the same as Figure
2.4 but with additional vectors plotted to enable sketching of the the solution
curves starting at the initial conditions. For plotting purposes, it is usually
advisable to rescale the vectors by a suitable constant since we are mainly
interested in the direction of the vectors and not their magnitudes. Figure 2.6
shows the full direction field with the solution curves starting at the initial
values. Without normalizing the vectors Figure 2.6 severely lack clarity.
dx
= x(x − 1)(x − 2). (2.10)
dt
Hence sketch the solutions satisfying the initial conditions
Figure 2.4: Direction field for a few points of the ODE dx/dt = t2 + x2 .
Figure 2.5: Same as Figure 2.4 but with additional vectors and the solution
curves through the inital values sketched.
Phase Lines
Autonomous equations are of the form
dx
= f (x), (2.11)
dt
where the function f is independent of t. As mentioned previously, the direc-
tion field for such equations are much easier to sketch. However, the direction
field for autonomous equations contain much redundant information. Since
f does not depend on t, there is little point in sketching the arrows in the
(t, x)−plane. So we can drop the t−coordinate and draw arrows only on the
x−axis; this is called a phase line. These concept is illustrated using the
equation below:
dx
= −A(x − x1 )(x − x2 )(x − x3 )2 , (2.12)
dt
for A > 0 and x1 , x2 , x3 are numbers. So
Figure 2.6: Same as Figure 2.5 but with additional vectors and the solution
curves through the inital values plotted using MATLAB.
f (x) = 0 =⇒ x = x1 , x = x2 , x = x3 .
b) The slopes in the direction field are all identical along horizontal lines
as shown in Figure 2.8 (left panel).
c) New solutions can be generated from old ones by time shifting (i.e.
replacing x(t) with x(t − t0 )).
Figure 2.7: Direction field for equation (2.10) together with the solution
curves; plotted with MATLAB.
Figure 2.8: [Left] Direction field for equation (2.12) together with some so-
lution curves. [Right] Phase line of the direction field on the left.
Figure 2.9: [Left] Direction field for equation (2.13) together with some so-
lution curves. [Right] Phase line of the direction field on the left.
2.4 Applications
2.4.1 The Logistic Population Model
The simple model
dx
= ax (2.14)
dt
is a simple example of a model for predicting population growth for a > 0.
The equation was briefly analyzed previously (see equation 2.6). It is called
the Malthusian model. x(t) measures the population of a species at time t.
It is based on the assumption that the rate of growth of the population is
proportional to the size of the population. It neglects several circumstances
of actual population growth, for example, actually populations cannot grow
without bound. Modifying the Malthusian model results in the logistic pop-
ulation model
dx x
= ax 1 − (2.15)
dt N
where a is the rate of population growth and N > 0 is called the “carrying
capacity” or “ideal population”. The model assumes that, if the population
is small, the growth rate is Malthusian. But if the population grows too
large, the growth rate becomes negative. Normalizing (2.15) results in
dx̃
= ax̃(1 − x̃)
dt
where x̃ = x/N . Neglecting the tilde sign on x, we get
dx
= ax(1 − x). (2.16)
dt
Now x represents the fraction of the ideal population at time t (0 ≤ x ≤ 1).
Qualitative Analysis
dx
= ax(1 − x). (2.17)
dt
Let the right hand side be represented by fa (x) = ax(1 − x). At the equilib-
rium points fa (x) = 0. This implies that
x = 0, x = 1
Analytical approach
The behaviour of solutions determined above may also be obtained analyti-
cally. Consider
f (x) = ax(1 − x), a > 0.
=⇒ f 0 (x) = a − 2ax = a(1 − 2x)
Thus,
f 0 (0) = a > 0 and f 0 (1) = −a < 0
(i) f 0 (0) > 0 implies that slopes must increase through x = 0. That is,
slopes (dx/dt) are negative below x = 0 and positive above it. There-
fore x = 0 is a source.
(ii) f 0 (1) < 0 implies that slopes must decrease through x = 1. So slopes
are positive for x < 1 and negative for x > 1. Hence x = 1 is a sink.
This is illustrated in the Figure ... below
x = 0, 1, −1
g 0 (x) = 1 − 3x2 .
=⇒ g 0 (0) = 1 > 0
So the equilibrium solution x = 0 is a source.
g 0 (1) = −2 < 0,
g 0 (−1) = −2 < 0
imples that the equilibrium solution x = −1 is also a sink. From the in-
formation above, we can draw the phase line, and subsequently the solution
curves of the differential equation as displayed in Figure...
x2 − x + h = 0
√
1 ± 1 − 4h
=⇒ x = .
2
We note the following points
(iii) If 1 − 4h < 0 (i.e. h > 1/4), we get no real solutions (complex roots).
Linear Systems
3.1 Introduction
Consider the linear system of the form
x1 = a11 (t)x1 + a12 (t)x2 + + a1n (t)xn + b1 (t)
x2 = a21 (t)x1 + a22 (t)x2 + + a2n (t)xn + b2 (t)
···
xn = an1 (t)x1 + an2 (t)x2 + + ann (t)xn + bn (t),
where the functions aij , 1 ≤ i, j ≤ n, bi , 1 ≤ i ≤ n are continuous real-valued
functions on the interval I. The equations above may be written in vector
equation form as
x0 (t) = A(t)x(t) + b(t) (3.1)
where
x1 x01
x2 x02
x= , x0 =
.. ..
. .
xn x0n
a11 (t) · · · a1n (t) b1 (t)
A(t) = .. .. .. b(t) = ... .
, (3.2)
. . .
an1 (t) · · · ann (t) bn (t)
Note that equation (3.1) also applies to nth order linear ODEs of the form
y (n) + pn−1 (t)y (n−1) + · · · + p0 (t)y = r(t)
25
Math 450 : Differential Equations II J.K.A
Then, with
x1
x2
x=
..
.
xn
we have that
0 1 0 ··· 0 0
0 0 1 ··· 0
0
A(t) = .. .. ... ... .. ..
, b(t) =
. . . .
0 0 0 1 0
−p0 (t) −p1 (t) −p2 (t) · · · −p(n−1)(t) r(t)
(3.3)
NOTE:
1) A matrix function is continuous on an interval I if and only if all of its
entries are continuous on I.
2) The matrix function A is called the companion (or coefficient) matrix
of the differential equation (3.1).
3) From the Picard-Lindelof theorem for systems of equations, the deriva-
tive matrix is given by
Df (t, x) = A(t).
Remark. (1) Note that the differential equation (3.1) can be written in
the form
Lx = x0 (t) − A(t)x(t) = b
where L is the linear operator defined in (3.4), and is called a linear
vector differential equation.
(2) If b is not the trivial vector function (b 6= 0), then the equation
Lx = b
c1 φ1 + c2 φ2 + c3 φ3 = 0,
c1 t + c2 t2 + c3 t3 = 0,
for all t ∈ I. Taking three derivatives of both sides of the equation above
results in 6c3 = 0, giving c3 = 0. Letting c3 = 0 in the equation and taking
two derivatives of the resulting equation yields c2 = 0. It then follows that
c1 = 0. Hence the three vector functions are linearly independent on I.
Theorem 4. The linear vector differential equation (3.6) has n linearly in-
dependent solutions on I, and if Φ1 , Φ2 , · · · , Φn are n linearly independent
solutions on I, then
x = C1 Φ1 + C2 Φ2 + · · · + Cn Φn
Ax = λx (3.7)
(ii) If λ0 is a number such that the vector equation (3.7) with λ replaced
by λ0 has a nontrivial solution x0 , then λ0 is called an eigenvalue of A
and x0 is called a corresponding eigenvector. (λ0 , x0 ) is an eigen pair
of A.
(A − λI)x = 0
has a nontrivial solution. From linear algebra we get that the characteristic
equation
det(A − λI) = 0
is satisfied. If λ0 is an eigenvalue, then to find a corresponding eigenvector
we want to find a nonzero vector x so that Ax = λ0 x or, equivalently, (A −
λ0 I)x = 0.
x0 (t) = λ0 eλ0 t x0
x0 (t) = eλ0 t λ0 x0
= eλ0 t Ax0
= Aeλ0 t x0
= A(t)x
for t ∈ R.
−λ 1
det(A − λI) = =0
−2 −3 − λ
=⇒ λ2 + 3λ + 2 = (λ + 2)(λ + 1) = 0.
Thus, the eigen values are λ1 = −2, λ2 = −1. We find its corresponding
eigenvectors for λ1 = −2 :
(A − λ1 I)x = (A + 2I)x = 0.
2 1 x1 0
= =0
−2 −1 x2 0
x1 1
=
x2 −2
1
So −2, is an eigen pair for A.
−2
For λ2 = −1
(A − λ2 I)x = (A + I)x = 0.
1 1 x1 0
= =0
−2 −2 x2 0
x1 1
=
x2 −1
1
So −1, is an eigen pair for A. So the Theorem on solutions of LVDE,
−1
the vector functions Φ1 , Φ2 defined by
−2t 1 −t 1
Φ1 (t) = e , Φ2 (t) = e
−2 −1
λ2 + 4 = 0
λ1 = 2i, λ2 = −2i.
For λ1 = 2i,
(A − 2iI)x = 0
3 − 2i 1 x1 0
=
−13 −3 − 2i x2 0
=⇒ (3 − 2i)x1 + x2 = 0
x1 1
=⇒ =
x2 −3 + 2i
1
Thus, 2i, is an eigen pair for A. Therefore, the vector function
−3 + 2i
Φ defined by
2it 1
Φ(t) = e ,
−3 + 2i
1
= [cos(2t) + i sin(2t)] ,
−3 + 2i
cos(2t) sin(2t)
= +i ,
−3 cos(2t) + 2 sin(2t) 2 cos(2t) − 3 sin(2t)
is a solution.
By the Theorem above, the vector functions Φ1 , Φ2 defined by
cos(2t)
Φ1 =
−3 cos(2t) + 2 sin(2t)
sin(2t)
Φ2 =
2 cos(2t) − 3 sin(2t)
are real vector-valued solutions of the D.E. Since Φ1 , Φ2 are linearly indepen-
dent on R by the Theorem above, the general solution is given by
X 0 = A(t)X (3.8)
where
x11 x12 ··· x1n x011 x012 ··· x01n
x21 x22 ··· x2n
0
x021 x022 ··· x02n
X := and X :=
.. .. .. .. .. ..
. . ··· . . . ··· .
xn1 xn2 ··· xnn xn1 x0n2
0
··· x0nn
x(t) = Φ(t)c
X = A(t)X, X(t0 ) = X0 ,
35
Math 450 : Differential Equations II J.K.A
x0 = Ax
where
1 9
A= .
−1 −5
1−λ 9
det(A − λI) = = 0,
−1 −5 − λ
−(1 − λ)(5 + λ) + 9 = 0,
=⇒ 5 + λ − 5λ − λ2 − 9 = 0,
=⇒ λ2 + 4λ + 4 = 0,
=⇒ (λ + 2)2 = 0
Thus, the eigenvalues are λ1 = −2, λ2 = −2 (repeated). We find the corre-
sponding eigenvector to λ1 = −2 as
(A − λ1 I)x = (A + 2I)x = 0.
3 9 x1 0
=
−1 −3 x2 0
x1 + 3x2 = 0, =⇒ x2 = 1, x1 = −3
x1 −3
=⇒ =
x2 1
−3
So −2, is an eigen pair for [Link], one solution of the system is
1
−2t −3
y1 (t) = e .
1
where
−3
(A − λ1 I)w = .
1
3 9 w1 −3
=
−1 −3 w2 1
w1 + 3w2 = −1. w2 = 0 =⇒ w1 = −1.
w1 −1
=⇒ =
w2 0
−2t −3 −2t −1
∴ y2 (t) = te +e
1 0
−3t − 1
=⇒ e−2t
t
The general solution is given by
−2t −3 −2t −3t − 1
y = C1 e + C2 e .
1 t
where
a b
A= .
c d
Definition 11. Every solution of (4.6) may be written as a curve, say φ(t) =
(x(t), y(t)), in the plane. The solution curves are called trajectories or orbits.
Remark. (a) The existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that tra-
jectories do not cross.
|A − λI| = 0,
λ1 − λ 0
=⇒ =0
0 λ2 − λ
=⇒ (λ1 − λ)(λ2 − λ) = 0,
=⇒ λ = λ1 , λ2
Now,
AV0 = λV0
x
where V0 = is an eigenvector. For the eigenvector λ1 :
y
λ1 0 x1 x1
=⇒ = λ1
0 λ2 x2 x2
=⇒ λ1 x1 = λ1 x1 =⇒ x1 = 1,
where any value of x1 (not just x1 = 1) satisfies the equation; we chose x1 = 1
for simplicity. Also
λ2 x2 = λ1 x2 =⇒ x2 = 0,
1
since λ1 , λ2 are distinct. Thus, an eigenvector associated with λ1 is .
0
For λ2 , we have
λ1 0 x1 x1
=⇒ = λ2
0 λ2 x2 x2
=⇒ λ1 x1 = λ2 x1 =⇒ x1 = 0,
and
λ2 x2 = λ2 x2 =⇒ x2 = 1,
where we again
chose x2 = 1 for simplicity. Thus, an eigenvector associated
0
with λ2 is .
1
Thus, the two solutions of the system are
λ1 t 1 λ2 t 0
X1 (t) = e , and X2 (t) = e .
0 1
The type of orbits for a system may also be derived analytically as illustrated
below. Let
Then,
dx dy
= αλ1 eλ1 t , = βλ2 eλ2 t
dt dt
dy dy/dt βλ2 eλ2 t
=⇒ = =
dx dx/dt αλ1 eλ1 t
dy λ2 y
=⇒ =
dx λ1 x
Figure 4.3: (a) A stable node for λ1 = −3, λ2 = −1, and (b) unstable node
for λ1 = 1, λ2 = 2.
Figure 4.4: (a) A unstable star for λ1 = λ2 > 0, and (b) a stable star for
λ1 = λ2 < 0.
x0 (t) = Ax(t)
where
α β
A= .
−β α
α−λ β
|A − λI| = 0 =⇒ = 0,
−β α − λ
=⇒ (α − λ)2 + β 2 = 0,
=⇒ α − λ = ±iβ
=⇒ λ = α ± iβ.
The eigenvector corresponding to α + iβ is given by
−iβ β x1 0
= ,
−β −iβ x2 0
=⇒ −iβx1 + βx2 = 0,
ix1 = x2 , =⇒ x1 = 1, x2 = i.
1
Hence is an eigenvector. Thus, a complex solution is given by
i
(α+iβ)t 1
X(t) = e ,
i
αt 1 cos βt + i sin βt
αt
= e (cos βt + i sin βt) =e ,
i − sin βt + i cos βt
αt cos βt αt sin βt
=e + ie ,
− sin βt cos βt
=⇒ X(t) ≡ XRe (t) + iXIm (t),
where XRe and XIm yield two real solutions. Hence, the general solution
becomes
αt cos βt αt sin βt
X(t) = C1 e + C2 e .
− sin βt cos βt
Using the eigenvalue α − iβ should yield the same general solution. Try it.
Remark. From the general solution, we get the x, y coordinates as
=⇒ x2 + y 2 = C12 + C22 = R2 ,
which is the equation of a circle centered at (0, 0). The equilibrium
point in this case is called a center.
(ii) If α 6= 0, the term eαt causes solutions to spiral into the origin for α < 0
or away from the origin for α > 0. For the case α < 0, the equilibrium
point is a spiral sink, and it is a spiral source for α > 0. The spiral
sink is called a stable focus and the spiral source is unstable focus.
(iii) How are the circles or spirals traversed? To answer this question, we
need to re-write the system in polar coordinates:
0
x α β x
=
y0 −β α y
=⇒ x0 (t) = αx(t) + βy(t)
=⇒ y 0 (t) = −βx(t) + αy(t)
Let x = r cos θ and y = r sin θ. Then r(t)2 = x(t)2 + y(t)2 .
=⇒ 2rr0 = 2xx0 + 2yy 0
=⇒ rr0 = x(αx + βy) + y(−βx + αy),
=⇒ rr0 = αx2 + βxy − βxy + αy 2 ,
=⇒ rr0 = α(x2 + y 2 ) = αr2
∴ r0 = αr (4.8)
Notice that the solution to (4.8) is r = Ceαt , where C is a constant.
This also indicates the circular (for α = 0) and spiral (for α 6= 0) nature
of the solutions.
Now,
y(t)
tan θ(t) =
x(t)
Differentiating both sides yields,
xy 0 − yx0
sec2 θ · θ0 = .
x2
Since sec2 θ = 1 + tan2 θ, we get
r2 θ0 = xy 0 − yx0 = x(−βx + αy) − y(αx + βy),
=⇒ r2 θ0 = −βx2 + αxy − αxy − βy 2 ,
=⇒ r2 θ0 = −βr2 ,
∴ θ0 = −β. (4.9)
Hence
(a) If θ0 > 0 (i.e. β < 0), then the trajectories spiral counterclockwise
around the origin.
(b) If θ0 < 0 (i.e. β > 0), then we get clockwise trajectories around the
origin.
Figures (4.6) and (4.6) display various phase portraits for complex eigenval-
ues.
Figure 4.6: Spiral sink (stable focus) (a) α < 0, β > 0, and (b) α < 0, β < 0.
Spiral source (unstable focus) (c) α > 0, β < 0, and (d) α > 0, β > 0
For a second linearly independent solution to the system, we can solve the
system directly:
x0 = λ 1 x + y
y 0 = λ1 y =⇒ y = C2 eλ1 t
=⇒ x0 = λ1 x + C2 eλ1 t
=⇒ x0 − λ1 x = C2 eλ1 t
This is a linear first order differential equation which can be solved using an
integrating factor, given by
R
µ = e− λ1 dt
= e−λ1 t
d −λ1 t
=⇒ e x = C2
dt
=⇒ e−λ1 t x = C2 t + C1
=⇒ x = c2 teλ1 t + C1 eλ1 t
Thus,
x C1 eλ1 t + C2 teλ1 t
=
y C2 eλ1 t
x λ1 t 1 λ1 t t
∴ = C1 e + C2 e .
y 0 1
This is, in fact, the general solution. It may be written as
λ1 t 1 λ1 t 1 0
X(t) = C1 e + C2 e t + .
0 0 1
Alternatively,
(iii)
dy C2 λ1
= (4.11)
dx C2 + C2 λ1 t + C1 λ1
dy
Thus, → 0 as t → ∞ for nonzero C2 , λ1 . This implies that slopes
dx
tend to be flat as t → ∞. That is, solutions tend toward
or away from
1
the origin in a direction tangent to the eigenvector . Alterna-
0
tively, note from equation (4.10) that as t → ∞, the dominant
term is
1
X ≈ C2 eλ1 t tV1 . So solutions are tangent to V1 = . Notice that
0
equation (4.11) may also be written as
dy C 2 λ1
= , (4.12)
dx C2 + C2 ln Cy2 + C1 λ1
Direction of Trajectories
Remark. In general
(a) Trajectories in these cases always emerge from (or move into) the origin
in a direction that is parallel to the eigenvector.
(b) They often start in one direction before turning around and moving off
into the other direction.
(c) The directions in which they move are opposite depending on which
side of the trajectory corresponding to the eigenvector we are on.
(d) As the trajectory move away from the origin it should start becoming
parallel to the trajectory corresponding to the eigenvector.
The direction of the trajectories for the case of repeated eigenvalues can
be a little confusing. One approach is to compute the direction of vectors
using the coefficient matrix at a few representative points in the plane. For
example, suppose
x0 = Ax
−1 1
where A = . Then λ1 = −1.
0 −1
−1 1 0 1
At the point (0, 1), we get the vector = , which
0 −1 1 −1
is pointing in the southeast direction.
−1 1 0 −1
At the point (0, −1), we get the vector = ,
0 −1 −1 1
which is pointing in the northwest direction. In this particular case, these
two test should be enough to get the direction of the trajectories. Other
calculations are shown below:
−1 1 1 0
At the point (1, 1), we get the vector = , which
0 −1 1 −1
is pointing downward.
−1 1 −1 0
At the point (−1, −1), we get the vector = ,
0 −1 −1 1
which is pointing upward.
−1 1 −1 2
At the point (−1, 1), we get the vector = ,
0 −1 1 −1
which is pointing to the southeast.
Example 24. Find the general solution of the following system, and sketch
the phase portraits.
0 7 1
x = x
−4 3
=⇒ 2x1 + x2 = 0 =⇒ x2 = −2x1
1
Thus, V = is an eigenvector. For a second eigenvector, we need to
−2
solve
(A − λI)w = V
2 1 w1 1
=⇒ =
−4 −2 w2 −2
2w1 + w2 = 1 =⇒ w2 = 1 − 2w1
w1 = 0 =⇒ w2 = 1
0
Thus, is an eigenvector, and the general solution is given by
1
5t 1 5t 1 5t 0
X(t) = C1 e + C2 te +e
−2 −2 1
To sketch the phase portrait, we will start in the same way that we do for the
real, distinct eigenvalue
case. We first sketch the trajectory that is parallel to
1
the eigenvector , and since the eigenvalue is positive the trajectory
−2
will be moving away from the origin. The rest of the trajectories are sketched
as explained in the remarks above. The graph is displayed in Figure 4.8.
Solution.
−7 − λ 1
|A − λI| = 0 =⇒ =0
−4 −3 − λ
(7 + λ)(3 + λ) + 4 = 0,
=⇒ λ2 + 10λ + 25 = 0,
=⇒ (λ + 5)2 = 0,
∴ λ = −5, −5.
For λ = −5, we have
−2 1 x1 0
=
−4 2 x2 0
=⇒ −2x1 + x2 = 0 =⇒ x2 = 2x1
1
Thus, V = is an eigenvector. So one solution is
2
−5t 1
X1 = e .
2
where
(A − λI)w = V.
−2 1 w1 1
=⇒ =
−4 2 w2 2
−2w1 + w2 = 1 =⇒ w2 = 1 + 2w1
w1 = 0 =⇒ w2 = 1.
0
Thus, is an eigenvector, and so
1
−5t 1 −5t 0
X2 = te +e .
2 1
y − 2x 1 y − 2x
e−5t = , t = − ln
C2 5 C2
Hence,
C1 1 y − 2x
x = (y − 2x) − ln .
C2 5 C2
The graph is displayed in Figure 4.9.
a−λ b
=⇒ = 0,
c d−λ
=⇒ (a − λ)(d − λ) − bc = 0,
1 √ 1 √
λ+ = (T + T 2 − 4D and λ− = (T − T 2 − 4D.
2 2
Remark. (i) The following equations show the relationship between the
eigenvalues, and the trace and determinant of A.
√ √
T + T 2 − 4D T − T 2 − 4D
λ+ + λ− = +
2 2
T T
= + =T
2 2
∴ T = λ+ + λ− .
√ √
T+ T 2 − 4D T− T 2 − 4D
λ+ λ− =
2 2
1 2
T − T 2 + 4D = D
=
4
∴ D = λ+ λ−
(iv) The sign of the discriminant T 2 − 4D tells us that the eigenvalues are
Case 1: T 2 − 4D < 0
This case yields complex eigenvalues so the phase portraits are spirals or
a center. Because the real part of the eigenvalues is T /2, we obtain the
following scenarios:
(c) a center if T = 0.
Case 2: T 2 − 4D > 0
In this case both eigenvalues are real, and result in the following scenarios.
(b) If D > 0 and T < 0 then we get a sink (this could be a nodal sink
or star sink). Recall that D = λ+ λ− and T = λ+ + λ− . Now D > 0
implies that both eigenvalues must either be positive or both must be
negative, but since T < 0, both eigenvalues must be negative. That is
the reason for the sink in this case.
(c) If D > 0 and T > 0, then we get a source, since both eigenvalues are
positive.
Case 3: D = 0, T 6= 0
In this case we get one zero eigenvalue.
Case 4: D = 0, T = 0
Both eigenvalues vanish in this case. The different cases are summarized in
the TD-plane in Figure with sample plots in the various regions/sections.
Remark. (i) There are infinitely many different matrices for each point
on the T D−plane. This is because the T D−plane is actually a 2D
representation of a 4D space, since the 2 × 2 matrices are determined
by four parameters.
(ii) The T D−plane is the analog of the bifurcation diagram for planar
systems. For example, crossing the parabola T 2 − 4D = 0 or the
T −axis results in the phase portrait undergoing a major change in its
geometry.
(iv) One limitation with using only D and T to analyze the geometry of pla-
nar systems is that we do not have the luxury of the actual eigenvalues
to help obtain accurate sketches of the phase portraits. For instance,
even though we obtain a saddle for D < 0, we cannot determine the
direction of trajectories from D and T .
5.1 Introduction
Consider the homogeneous system
x0 (t) = Ax(t), (5.1)
where x is a vector and A is a matrix. Following the approach for linear
equations, we assume a solution of the form
x(t) = ert u (5.2)
where r is a constant and u is a constant vector. Substitute (5.2) into (5.1)
to get
rert u = Aert u = ert Au
=⇒ ru = Au
∴ (A − Ir)u = 0. (5.3)
This implies that:
(i) Equation (5.2) is a solution to (5.1) iff (5.3) is satisfied. The r0 s are the
eigenvalues and the nonzero u0 s are called the eigenvectors. We have
already encountered this method in the previous chapters.
(ii) If a matrix A is not symmetric, it is possible for A to have a repeated
eigenvalue but not to have two linearly independent eigenvectors. For
example, the system with
1 −1
A= ,
4 −3
63
Math 450 : Differential Equations II J.K.A
(A − Ir1 )w = u; s = 1,
x(t) = eAt · C
where eAt is called the matrix exponential, and C is a constant vector. Hence-
forth, we let A = A, x = x and C = C.
Definition 16. Suppose A is an n × n constant matrix. Then
t2 tn
eAt = I + At + A2 + · · · An + · · · (5.5)
2! n!
for t ∈ R and I is the identity matrix. That is
∞
At
X tn
e = An .
n=0
n!
Similar to the scalar exponential eat , the series (5.5) converges for all t;
but the proof is beyond the scope of this course. The computation of eAt is
more involved if A is not a special type of matrix. We would consider the
special cases before tackling the general case, after outlining some properties
of the matrix exponential:
Now,
t2 tn
eAt = I + At + A2 + · · · + An + · · ·
2! n!
2
2 s 0 s 0 s 0
A = · =
0 g 0 g 0 g2
2 3
3 2 s 0 s 0 s 0
A =A A= =
0 g2 0 g 0 g3
..
.
n
n s 0
A = .
0 gn
Thus
At 1 0 st 0 s2 t2 /2! 0 sn tn /n! 0
e = + + 2 2 + ··· + n n + ···
0 1 0 gt 0 g t /2! 0 g t /n!
1 + st + s2 t2 /2! + · · · + sn tn /n! + · · · 0
=
0 1 + gt + g t /2! + · · · + g n tn /n! + · · ·
2 2
st
e 0
=
0 egt
e−2t 0
At
e = .
0 e3t
Remark. Also find the solution of the same system by (a) finding the eigen
pairs (b) solving the individual equations directly. Did you get the same
solution as above?
t2 tk−1
eBt = I + Bt + B 2 + · · · + B k−1
2! (k − 1)!
2 3
Example 28. Let A = . Then the characteristic polynomial equa-
4 1
tion for A is given by
2−r 3
P (r) = = r2 − 3r − 10 = 0.
4 1−r
0 0 0
=⇒ (A − I)2 = 0 0 0
0 0 0
(Note that (A − I)2 = 0 is purely coincidental, it has nothing to do with
nilpotency). Thus,
1 0 0 1 1 1
eAt = et 0 1 0 + 1 1 1 t
0 0 1 −2 −2 −2
t
e (1 + t) tet tet
= tet et (1 + t) tet .
t t t
−2te −2te e (1 − 2t)
A general procedure for computing eAt if nilpotency does not hold is given
in the next few sections. The first approach we want to consider is by using
generalized eigenvectors. An alternative method, which would be considered
later, is referred to as the Putzer algorithm.
(A − rI)k u = 0
where the ri0 s are distinct eigenvalues of A and mi is the multiplicity of the
eigenvalue ri , then for each i there are mi linearly independent eigenvectors
associated with ri . If u is a generalized eigenvector associated with ri , then
(A − ri I)mi u = 0.
x0 (t) = Ax,
P (r) = |A − rI|
Example 30. Using generalized eigenvectors, compute eAt for the system
x0 (t) = Ax, where
1 1
A= .
−1 3
Hence, find the solution of the system.
Solution. We first solve |A − rI| = 0 such that
1−r 1
=0
−1 3 − r
=⇒ (1 − r)(3 − r) + 1 = 0
=⇒ 3 − r − 3r + r2 + 1 = 0, =⇒ r2 − 4r + 4 = 0
=⇒ (r − 2)2 = 0.
Therefore r = 2, with multiplicity 2. For the eigenvector corresponding to
r = 2, we solve
(A − 2I)U = 0
−1 1 u1
=⇒ =0
−1 1 u2
=⇒ −u1 + u2 = 0, u1 = u2
1
∴ U1 =
1
is an eigenvector. So a solution is
2t 1
X1 = e .
1
(A − 2I)2 u = 0.
Now,
2 −1 1 −1 1 0 0
(A − 2I) = = .
−1 1 −1 1 0 0
0 0 u1 0
=⇒ =
0 0 u2 0
Thus, any vector U2 , linearly independent of U1 , will suffice. So we choose
0
U2 = .
1
is given by
At 2t 1−t 2t t
x(t) = e · C = C1 e + C2 e .
−t 1+t
Example 31. Find the fundamental matrix eAt for the system
1 0 0
0
x (t) = Ax, A = 1 3 0 .
0 1 1
Solution.
1−r 0 0
P (r) = |A − rI| = 1 3−r 0 ,
0 1 1−r
3−r 0
= (1 − r) = (1 − r)(3 − r)(1 − r),
1 1−r
= (1 − r)2 (3 − r) = −(r − 1)2 (r − 3).
Therefore, the eigenvalues are r = 1 with multiplicity 2, and r = 3 with
multiplicity 1. For r = 1, we need two linearly independent eigenvectors.
Let’s represent them by U1 and U2 . We start with
(A − rI)U1 = 0, =⇒ (A − I)U1 = 0
0 0 0 u1
=⇒ 1 2 0 u2 = 0
0 1 0 u3
=⇒ u1 + 2u2 = 0
But from the last row, we have
u2 = 0. =⇒ u1 = 0.
(A − rI)2 U2 = 0. =⇒ (A − I)2 U2 = 0
0 0 0 0 0 0
=⇒ 1 2 0 1 2 0 U2 = 0
0 1 0 0 1 0
0 0 0 u1
2 4 0 u2 = 0
1 2 0 u3
=⇒ u1 + 2u2 = 0.
In general, we can let u3 = s, and u2 = v, so that
−2v −2 0
U2 = v = v 1 + s 0 .
s 0 1
(A − 3I)U3 = 0
−2 0 0 u1
=⇒ 1 0 0 u2
0 1 −2 u3
=⇒ −2u1 = 0 =⇒ u1 = 0.
u2 − 2u3 = 0
Solution.
|A − λI| = 0 =⇒ λ2 − 4λ + 4 = 0
=⇒ (λ − 2)2 = 0, =⇒ λ1 = λ2 = 2.
1
X
At
e = Pk+1 (t)Mk
0
Thus,
d −2t
e P2 = 1, =⇒ e−2t P2 = t + C2
dt
77 c Dr. Joseph K. Ansong
Math 450 : Differential Equations II J.K.A
=⇒ P2 = te2t + C2 e2t .
But P2 (0) = 0 =⇒ C2 = 0. Thus,
P2 (t) = te2t .
Hence
P1 e2t 2t 1
P = = =e .
P2 te2t t
From equation (*), we have
At 2t 1 0 −1 1 2t
e =e + te
0 1 −1 1
2t 1 0 −t t
=e +
0 1 −t t
2t 1−t t
=e .
−t 1 + t
Note that we also solved the problem above using generalized eigenvectors.
Compare the two methods. We can find the solution of the system x0 = Ax
if we need to; the solution is given by
At 2t 1−t 2t t
x(t) = e c = c1 e + c2 e .
−t 1+t
Solution.
2−λ 0 0
|A − λI| = 0 =⇒ 1 2−λ 0 = 0.
1 0 3−λ
=⇒ (λ − 2)2 (λ − 3) = 0.
=⇒ λ1 = λ2 = 2, λ3 = 3
are eigenvalues. By the Putzer algorithm
1
X
At
e = Pk+1 (t)Mk
0
Thus, we get the three IVPs below, which need to be solved sequentially:
P1 = e2t .
where we assume that the ξi (i = 1, 2) are small (|ξi | 1). By carrying out
a 2-dimensional Taylor expansion, we get
∂f1 ∗ ∂f1 ∗
f1 (x) = f1 (x∗ ) + ξ1 (x ) + ξ2 (x ) + higher order terms,
∂x1 ∂x2
∂f1 ∗ ∂f2 ∗
=⇒ f1 (x) ≈ ξ1 (x ) + ξ2 (x ),
∂x1 ∂x2
81
Math 450 : Differential Equations II J.K.A
This linear system is called the linearized equation of (6.1) and it is the equa-
tion which describes the behaviour of the sytem near the fixed point. We
would like to know if solutions of the nonlinear system (6.1) and the linear
system (6.3) behave similarly, at least close to the fixed point x∗ . So the
stability of the equilibrium points of the nonlinear system is now reduced to
analyzing the behaviour of the linearized system.
Remark. The equilibrium points to which the theorem applies are sta-
ble/unstable nodes, stable/unstable spiral points and saddle (hyperbolic)
points. In the other cases not mentioned in the theorem, the behaviour of
the fixed point may remain the same as in the linear system or may behave
completely different from the linear case! The following examples demon-
strate the application of the linearization theorem.
Example 34. Find the equilibrium points and determine their nature for
the system
ẋ = 2y + xy, (6.7)
ẏ = x + y.
Hence plot a possible phase diagram of the system.
Solution. We determine the equilibrium point (x, y) from the simultaneous
equations
2y + xy = 0,
x + y = 0.
From the first equation, we find that y = 0 or x = −2, and the from the
second equation we get y = −x. So the equilibrium points are (0, 0) and
(−2, 2). We consider each equilibrium point.
Case 1: Equilibrium point (0, 0).
The eigenvalues
of A are λ1 = −1 and λ2 = 2 with corresponding
−2 1
eigenvectors and . Thus, (0, 0) is a saddle point for the
1 1
linear system, and hence, by the linearization theorem, also a saddle
point for the nonlinear system.
The eigenvalues
of Aareλ1 = 1 and λ2 = 2 with corresponding eigen-
0 1
vectors and . Thus, (−2, 2) is an unstable node for the
1 1
linearized system, and hence, by the linearization theorem, also for the
nonlinear system. A possible phase diagram of the linearized system is
shown in Figure (6.1).
The Jacobian matrix at (0, 0) has eigenvalues ±i. Hence (0, 0) is a center for
the linearized system, and the Linearization Theorem cannot be applied to
Figure 6.1: A phase diagram of the linearized system for equation (6.7).
draw any conclusions about the stability of the nonlinear system at (0, 0).
From (6.8), we get
p
ẋx = xy − x2 x2 + y 2 ,
p
ẏy = −xy − y 2 x2 + y 2 ,
d 2
Note that (x + y 2 ) = 2xẋ + 2y ẏ, therefore
dt
d 2
(x + y 2 ) = 2xẋ + 2y ẏ = −2(x2 + y 2 )3/2 < 0. (6.9)
dt
So the function V (x, y) = x2 + y 2 is a strictly decreasing function of t.
Since V (x, y) measures the separation from the origin, we deduce that x(t)
gets closer to (0, 0) as t increases. Thus we deduce that (0, 0) is a stable
equilibrium point of (6.8). This conclusion can be proved in this particular
example by integrating (6.9) to
1
x2 (t) + y 2 (t) = ,
(t + c)2
showing that V tends to 0 as t → ∞. The technique above is often useful in
establishing whether an equilibrium point is stable or not, and the function
V = x2 + y 2 can be replaced by any function with similar properties.
The following definitions and theorem are helpful in analyzing the stabil-
ity, asymptotic stability, and unstability of the trivial solution (or equilibrium
point) of nonlinear autonomous systems. Consider the nonlinear system
ẋ = f (x), (6.10)
where the function f = (f1 , · · · , fn ) and its partial derivatives are assumed
to be continuous in an open set Ω ∈ Rn containing the origin. Let V (x) be
a scalar continuous function defined in Ω and V (0) = 0.
Example 35. The function V (x1 , x2 ) = c1 x21 + c2 x22 , where c1 > 0, c2 > 0 is
positive definite in Ω = R2 .
Example 36. The function V (x1 , x2 , x3 ) = c1 x21 + c2 x22 , where c1 > 0, c2 > 0
is positive semidefinite in Ω = R3 since it vanishes on the x3 −axis.
(i) d
dt
(V (x(t))) ≤ 0, then x∗ is a stable equilibrium point,
(ii) d
dt
(V (x(t))) > 0, then x∗ is an unstable equilibrium point,
(iii) d
dt
(x(t))) < 0, then x∗ is an asymptotically stable equilib-
(V
rium point.
Thus, the derivative of V (x) with respect to t along the solution x(t) of the
nonlinear system is known, although we do not have the explicit solution.
In general, it is difficult to find a Lyapunov function for a given system
of equations. It is sometimes possible to guess a Lyapunov function from
geometrical or physical considerations.
dV (x)
V∗ = = −2(x21 + x22 )(x22 + x22 − r2 ).
dt
ẋ = −xy 4 ,
ẏ = yx4 .
∂V ∂u1 ∂V ∂u2
V∗ = +
∂u1 ∂t ∂u2 ∂t
= 2c1 u1 u̇1 + 2c2 u2 u̇2
= 2c1 u1 (2u1 u2 + u31 ) + 2c2 u2 (−u21 + u52 )
= 4c1 u21 u2 + 2c1 u41 − 2c2 u21 u2 + 2c2 u62
= u2 u21 (4c1 − 2c2 ) + 2(c1 u41 + c2 u62 )
Let c1 > 0, then c2 > 0 and so V = c1 u21 + c2 u22 = c1 (u21 + 2u22 ) > 0 for
(u1 , u2 ) 6= (0, 0). Also, V ∗ > 0 for c1 > 0 and therefore the equilibrium point
(0, 0) is unstable.
Remark. Note that the case c1 < 0, and therefore c2 < 0, is unacceptable
since this violates requirement (1) in the Theorem 14.
Lipschitz Condition
= |3y2 − 3y1 |
= 3|y2 − y1 |.
∴ f is Lipschitz with L = 3.
Example 41. Show that f (x, y) = x2 y + x2 ex satisfies a Lipschitz condition
on the interval D = {(x, y)|1 ≤ x ≤ 2; −2 ≤ y ≤ 5}. We have
2 2
|f (x, y1 ) − f (x, y2 )| = y1 + x2 ex − y2 − x2 ex
x x
2
= |y1 − y2 |
x
≤ 2|y1 − y2 |.
The inequality holds by applying the bounds on x. Thus, f satisfies a Lips-
chitz condition on D with L = 2.
89
Math 450 : Differential Equations II J.K.A
= |x||y1 + y2 ||y1 − y2 |
is not bounded by any constant times |y1 − y2 |, so f is not Lipschitz on the
domain R × R. However, f is Lipschitz on any rectangle [a, b] × [c, d] since
we have
x|y1 + y2 | ≤ 2 · max{|a|, |b|} · max{|c|, |d|}
on R.
Remark. a) There are examples of functions that are Lipschitz but not
differentiable, as for example f (y) = |y|, and Theorem 15 applies for
such functions.
Theorem 16. []
Let the domain D be convex and the function f (x, y) be differentiable
with respect to y in D. Then for the Lipschitz condition to be satisfied,
it is necessary and sufficient that
∂f (x, y)
Sup ≤ L. (A.3)
D ∂y
f (x, y1 ) − f (x, y2 )
=⇒ ≤L
y1 − y2
Taking the limit as y2 → y1 on both sides, we get
Example 43. Show that f (x, y) = 1+x sin(xy) satisfies a Lipschitz condition
on 0 ≤ x ≤ 2 and −∞ < y < ∞.
Solution. The set {0 ≤ x ≤ 2 and − ∞ < y < ∞} is convex.
∂f
= x2 cos(xy)
∂y
∂f
=⇒ = x2 |cos(xy)| ≤ x2
∂y
≤4
So f is Lipschitz with L = 4.
∂f (x, y) 2 2
= ≤ ≡ L.
∂y 3|y 1/3 | 3 (y0 /2)1/3
and conversely.
Proof. Let
dy
= f (x, y(x)),
dx
92 c Dr. Joseph K. Ansong
Math 450 : Differential Equations II J.K.A
Z x Z
dy
=⇒ dt = xf (t, y(t))dt
x0 dt x0
Z
=⇒ y(x) − y(x0 ) = xf (t, y(t))dt
x0
Z
∴ y(x) = y0 + xf (t, y(t))dt
x0
dy
= f (x, y(x)).
dx
ar2 + br + c = 0. (B.3)
c) If b2 − 4ac > 0, the roots r1 and r2 are real and distinct. Then the
solutions are y1 = er1 t and y2 = er2 t . Combining the solutions gives the
general solution
y = C1 er1 t + C2 er2 t
where C1 and C2 are unknown constants.
95
Math 450 : Differential Equations II J.K.A
d) If b2 − 4ac = 0, then r1 and r2 are real repeated roots, and the solutions
are given by y1 = er1 t and y2 = ter1 t . The general solution is then given
by
y = C1 er1 t + C2 ter1 t
a) y 00 − y 0 − 2y = 0
b) y 00 + 8y 0 + 16y = 0
c) y 00 − 6y 0 + 10y = 0
Solution. a)
y 00 − y 0 − 2y = 0
Substitute y = ert into the equation to get
r2 − r − 2 = 0
=⇒ (r − 2)(r + 1) = 0
=⇒ r = 2, −1
S we get
y = C1 e2t + C2 e−t
b)
y 00 + 8y 0 + 16y = 0
=⇒ r2 + 8r + 16 = 0,
=⇒ (r + 4)2 = 0,
=⇒ r = −4, −4;
a repeated root.
=⇒ y = C1 e−4t + C2 te−4t
c)
y 00 − 6y 0 + 10y = 0
=⇒ r2 − 6r + 10 = 0,
√
6 ± 36 − 40
=⇒ r =
2
6 ± 2i
=⇒ r =
2
=⇒ 3 ± i
=⇒ α = 3, β = 1.
Thus, the general solution is given by
y 00 + 2y 0 − 8y = 0,
y 0 (0) = −12. (B.4)
Solution.
y 00 + 2y 0 − 8y = 0,
=⇒ r2 + 2r − 8 = 0
=⇒ (r + 4)(r − 2) = 0
=⇒ r = −4, 2
=⇒ y = C1 e−4t + C2 e2t
Applying the initial conditions:
y(0) = 3 =⇒ C1 + C2 = 3
ay 00 + by 0 + cy = ktm ert ,
with
or
ay 00 + by 0 + cy = ktm eαt sin(βt)
use the following form for the particular solution
with
(b) 2y 00 + y = 9e2t
(c) y 00 − y = t sin(t)
Solution. (a)
y 00 − y = −11t + 1
The characteristic equation is given by
r2 − 1 = 0 =⇒ r = 1, −1.
yh = C1 et + C2 e−t .
yp = At + B
=⇒ yp0 = A
=⇒ yp00 = 0
Substituting into the original equation results in
−yp = −11t + 1
=⇒ −At − B = −11t + 1
Comparing coefficients gives
A = 11, B = −1.
yp = 11t − 1
(b)
y 00 − y = t sin(t)
=⇒ r2 − 1 = 0 =⇒ r = ±1.
The form of the particular solution is
=⇒ 9A = 9, =⇒ A = 1
Thus
yp = e2t .
y 00 + 2y 0 − 3y = f (t)
where f (t) is
(f) f (t) = t2 et
yp = t(At2 + Bt + C)et
s (B.6)
Eigenvectors play a critical role in solving matrix differential equations by forming a basis for the space of solutions. When the matrix A has sufficient linearly independent eigenvectors, the solutions to the differential equation x' = Ax can be expressed in terms of these eigenvectors. They help in constructing the general solution and calculating the matrix exponential, which is crucial for expressing the solution as a relation involving time .
Direction fields provide a graphical representation that helps in obtaining a qualitative view of solution graphs of a differential equation without solving it. A direction field is a map that assigns a tangent vector to every point in the plane defined by the differential equation. By sketching these directional vectors, we can visualize solution trajectories to understand their qualitative behavior .
The constant solutions, or equilibrium points, for the differential equation dx/dt = x(x - 1)(x - 2) occur when f(t, x) = 0, leading to the solutions x = 0, 1, 2. These points represent the values where the system does not change over time, indicating equilibrium where the direction field lines are horizontal .
The matrix exponential, eAt, defined for a constant matrix A, is crucial in solving linear differential systems as it provides a method for expressing the solution in a compact form involving time. It satisfies the matrix differential equation x'(t) = Ax(t) and forms a fundamental matrix, thus allowing solutions of the form x(t) = eAt · C where C is a constant vector. This is particularly important for systems where the direct solution is non-trivial .
Isoclines are lines for which the slope of the direction field, dy/dx, is constant. By plotting isoclines, one can interpret the direction and steepness of trajectories across different segments of the field. This makes the assessment of vector directions and slopes more systematic, assisting in sketching accurate solution paths in the phase plane .
The sign of α plays a critical role in determining the qualitative behavior of solutions to the differential equation dx/dt = αx. If α > 0, solutions tend toward the equilibrium solution as t →∞, and the qualitative nature of solutions remains unchanged if α is replaced by another positive number. Conversely, if α = 0, any slight change in α can lead to a drastic change in solution behavior, resulting in a bifurcation at α = 0 .
In autonomous differential equations, where the function does not explicitly depend on time, solutions can be transformed by time shifting without altering their qualitative behavior. This means generating new solutions from existing ones merely by changing the time variable, hence making the equations invariant to such transformations .
Phase portraits provide a visual representation of the qualitative behavior of trajectories in planar systems by illustrating how solutions evolve over time in the phase plane. They help in identifying equilibrium points, stability, and overall system dynamics by highlighting how trajectories approach, spiral around, or repel from equilibrium. This holistic view aids in understanding complex behaviors without explicit solutions .
In matrix differential equations, the linear independence of eigenvectors is essential as it determines the ability to form a fundamental solution set. If the eigenvectors are linearly independent, they span the solution space, allowing the construction of the general solution. When there are fewer independent eigenvectors, further analysis is required to handle cases such as those with repeated eigenvalues .
An equilibrium point is considered stable if solutions starting close to this point remain close as time progresses towards infinity. Mathematically, this indicates that neighboring solutions are attracted towards the equilibrium point, such as what is termed as 'sink' in phase lines where solutions naturally converge with time .