Republic of the Philippines
Region X – Northern Mindanao
Department of Education
Division of Lanao del Norte
LINAMON DISTRICT
SAMBURON INTEGRATED SCHOOL
Samburon, Linamon, Lanao Del Norte
The Price of Greed: Corruption in Flood Control Infrastructure”
Prepared by Sampurna, Aminola [Link] the People of the Philippines
The Current Reality
The Philippines currently does not recognize same-sex marriage. The Family code, the legal
framework governing marriage, defines marriage as solely between a man and a woman. This
exclusion creates a system of legal and social inequalities that disproportionately affects
LGBTQ+ Filipino.
During last year’s presidential election campaign, Duterte said he was open to the idea. “If
[draft same-sex marriage legislation] reaches me in whatever capacity, I’ll consider it,”
Duterte said in February 2016. The remark boosted Duterte’s popularity in the lesbian, gay,
bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community and gave credibility to his image as a
politician respectful of LGBT rights. Pantaleon Alvarez, the speaker of the House of
Representatives and a close Duterte ally, responded by promising to support same-sex
marriage legislation.
Critics quickly denounced the president’s turnaround. A Filipino LGBT activist decried the
flip-flop as a blow to the LGBT community’s efforts to establish a legal foundation for
“property rights and even in caring for children both parties decide to adopt.” While same-sex
“holy unions“ do occur in the Philippines, they are not legally recognized under marriage
laws, forcing couples to resort to legal instruments including “special power of attorney”
documents to provide their relationships a modicum of legal protection. Duterte’s reversal is
not just about campaign promises – it jeopardizes the fundamental rights of LGBT partners
and families.
Allowing same-sex marriage would enable gays and lesbians in the Philippines to marry the
person they love and would strengthen everyone’s rights. From a human rights perspective,
broadening civil marriage to couples of the same sex demonstrates respect for the
fundamental rights of equality and nondiscrimination. It should be enshrined in Philippine
law.
The Philippines should join countries including the United States, South Africa, Brazil,
Colombia, Argentina, Uruguay, New Zealand, Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Portugal,
Sweden, and Ireland, all of which have enshrined marriage equality in their laws. In Asia,
lawmakers in Taiwan are mulling a draft law that would legalize same-sex marriage.
Duterte’s backtracking is easily remedied. He and his government should demonstrate the
political will to push through legislation to protect the rights of the country’s LGBT
population, starting with same-sex marriage.
The Philippines is known to be one of the most LGBT-friendly countries in Asia, despite its
deeply entrenched Catholic culture. The argument over same-sex marriage centres on
whether or not it is appropriate for people of the same gender to be able to legally wed. Civil
rights, societal standards, religious convictions, and even the definition of marriage itself are
all touched upon in this hotly debated subject. When arguing against equal marriage rights,
opponents frequently point to religious or traditional beliefs, saying that marriage should only
be between a man and a woman. Supporters of equal marriage rights emphasise the values of
love, equality, and non-discrimination. Over the years, this discussion has prompted
legislative and societal reforms in numerous nations, reflecting shifting opinions and beliefs.
A Case for Equality, Human Rights, and Strong Families
The legalization of same-sex marriage is not merely a matter of choice or personal
preference, but a fundamental issue of equality, human rights, and the strengthening of
families.
Equality Under the Law: The Philippine Constitution explicitly guarantees equality
to all citizens. Denying same-sex couples the right to marry denies them this
fundamental right and effectively treats them as second-class citizens. Legalizing
same-sex marriage would ensure that LGBTQ+ individuals enjoy the same rights and
protections under the law as heterosexual couples.
A Universal Right: The right to marry is recognized as a fundamental human right in
various international declarations. The denial of this right to same-sex couples
constitutes a form of discrimination that violates international human rights norms.
Forging Strong Families: Legalizing same-sex marriage would provide stability
and recognition for same-sex couples and their families. It would offer legal
protections for children raised by same-sex parents, guaranteeing them rights to
inheritance and adoption, ensuring their security and well-being.
III. Addressing Concerns: Myth Busting
Opponents of same-sex marriage often raise concerns that have been repeatedly debunked by
research and evidence-based arguments.
Traditional Values: Marriage is an evolving institution that has always adapted to
changing societal norms. Granting rights to same-sex couples does not diminish the
validity of heterosexual marriage. It simply expands the definition of marriage to
encompass the diverse forms of love and commitment that exist in society.
Religious Concerns: The Philippines, like many countries, has a principle of
separation of church and state. Civil marriage is a legal institution separate from
religious institutions, which can maintain their own interpretations and definitions of
marriage. Legalizing same-sex marriage does not force any religious institution to
change its beliefs.
Impact on Children: Extensive research consistently demonstrates that children
raised by same-sex parents fare just as well as those raised by heterosexual parents.
Children’s well-being is primarily determined by the love, care, and stability they
receive, regardless of their parents’ sexual orientation.
The Path Forward: A Call to Action
The Philippines stands at a crossroads. Continuing to deny marriage equality not only
perpetuates discrimination and inequality but also harms LGBTQ+ individuals, their families,
and society as a whole. To achieve a truly just and equitable society, we must take decisive
action.
Legislative Action: Congress should pass legislation legalizing same-sex marriage,
ensuring equal legal rights for all Filipinos regardless of their sexual orientation.
Judicial Recognition: The Supreme Court should uphold the constitutional right to
marriage equality, recognizing that the Constitution guarantees equal protection under
the law.
Public Education: Public education campaigns are crucial to promoting
understanding and acceptance of same-sex marriage, challenging outdated prejudices
and fostering a more inclusive society:
The Importance of Equality: A More Just Future
The denial of marriage equality has a profound impact on LGBTQ+ Filipinos, preventing
them from fully participating in society and enjoying the fundamental rights and protections
that everyone else has access to. Legalizing same-sex marriage would be a powerful step
towards affirming the dignity and worth of all Filipinos, creating a more just and equitable
society where everyone can live with dignity and respect.
Conclusion
The Philippines has a unique opportunity to join the growing number of nations that have
recognized marriage equality, setting a positive example for the region and the world. By
taking the courageous step to legalize same-sex marriage, the Philippines can demonstrate its
commitment to upholding human rights, fostering a more inclusive and equitable society, and
creating a future where love, commitment, and equality prevail.
Reference
Adolescent Drug Testing Policies in Schools Sharon Levy, MD, MPH, FAAP, Miriam
Schizer, MD, MPH, FAAP, COMMITTEE ON SUBSTANCE ABUSE, American Academy
of Pediatrics, PEDIATRICS Volume 135, number 4, April 2015.
Preventing Drug Use Among Child and Adolescents. A Research
based Guide for Parents, Educators, and Community Leaders., Second Edition, National
Institute on Drug Abuse.
[Link], B.A.,[Link] B.A., and [Link], PhD. The Influence of Substance Abuse
on Adolescent Brain Development. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2009 Jan. 40(1):31-38.
Cheon JW. Best Practices in Community-Based Prevention for Youth Substance Reduction:
Towards Strengths-Based Positive Development Policy. Journal of Community Psychology,
Vol 36 Issue 6.
Frequently Asked Questions About Drug Testing in Schools. National Institute on Drug
Abuse. Rev May 2017.