0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views2 pages

Filipino Resilience Research Questionnaire

The document is a research questionnaire designed to gather demographic information and assess perceptions of resilience among Filipinos in the context of disasters. It includes a Likert scale section with statements regarding resilience and its implications, as well as open-ended qualitative questions exploring personal experiences and opinions on government responses. The aim is to understand the impact of societal expectations of resilience on individuals and communities during crises.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
52 views2 pages

Filipino Resilience Research Questionnaire

The document is a research questionnaire designed to gather demographic information and assess perceptions of resilience among Filipinos in the context of disasters. It includes a Likert scale section with statements regarding resilience and its implications, as well as open-ended qualitative questions exploring personal experiences and opinions on government responses. The aim is to understand the impact of societal expectations of resilience on individuals and communities during crises.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

RESEARCH QUESTIONNAIRE

Part I: Demographic Profile;

[Link]:___

[Link]:____

[Link] of residence:_________

[Link] of calamities experienced in the past 5 years:_______

Part 2. LIKERT SCALE: ( 5- Strongly Agree, 4- Agree, 3- Neutral, 2- Disagree, 1- Strongly Disagree)

QUESTIONS: 5 4 3 2 1

1.I consider resilience as a positive trait of Filipinos during


times of crisis.

[Link] resilient helps me recover emotionally and physically


after a disaster.

[Link] expects me to remain strong even if I am struggling


after a calamity.

[Link] focus on resilience sometimes prevents people from


demanding better government support.

5.I believe the government uses “resilience” as an excuse for


lack of proper disaster response.

[Link] helps communities unite and suppor6.


Resilience helpst each other.

[Link] too much on resilience leads to neglect of long-


term disaster preparedness.

[Link] should prioritize systemic change and


preparedness, not just rely on the resilience of its people.
QUALITATIVE QUESTIONS (OPEN-ENDED)

QUESTIONS EXPLANATION

1. Can you share an experience where being


resilient helped you or your community
recover after a disaster?

2. In your opinion, when does resilience


become toxic positivity?

3. How do you think government officials


use the idea of “Filipino resilience” in times
of calamity?

4. What changes in governance or disaster


preparedness would you recommend for
Odiongan to reduce over-reliance on
resilience?

5. How has society’s expectation for you to


“be resilient” affected your personal
recovery during crises?

6. Do you think being labeled as “resilient”


sometimes prevents people from showing
their struggles? Why or why not?

8. How does the idea of resilience influence


your trust (or distrust) in government
response during disasters?

9. What do you think are the long-term


effects of constantly being told to “stay
strong” after every calamity?

10. If you had the power to change one


thing about how resilience is used in
governance, what would it be and why?

You might also like