RESEARCH QUESTIONNAIRE
Part I: Demographic Profile;
[Link]:___
[Link]:____
[Link] of residence:_________
[Link] of calamities experienced in the past 5 years:_______
Part 2. LIKERT SCALE: ( 5- Strongly Agree, 4- Agree, 3- Neutral, 2- Disagree, 1- Strongly Disagree)
QUESTIONS: 5 4 3 2 1
1.I consider resilience as a positive trait of Filipinos during
times of crisis.
[Link] resilient helps me recover emotionally and physically
after a disaster.
[Link] expects me to remain strong even if I am struggling
after a calamity.
[Link] focus on resilience sometimes prevents people from
demanding better government support.
5.I believe the government uses “resilience” as an excuse for
lack of proper disaster response.
[Link] helps communities unite and suppor6.
Resilience helpst each other.
[Link] too much on resilience leads to neglect of long-
term disaster preparedness.
[Link] should prioritize systemic change and
preparedness, not just rely on the resilience of its people.
QUALITATIVE QUESTIONS (OPEN-ENDED)
QUESTIONS EXPLANATION
1. Can you share an experience where being
resilient helped you or your community
recover after a disaster?
2. In your opinion, when does resilience
become toxic positivity?
3. How do you think government officials
use the idea of “Filipino resilience” in times
of calamity?
4. What changes in governance or disaster
preparedness would you recommend for
Odiongan to reduce over-reliance on
resilience?
5. How has society’s expectation for you to
“be resilient” affected your personal
recovery during crises?
6. Do you think being labeled as “resilient”
sometimes prevents people from showing
their struggles? Why or why not?
8. How does the idea of resilience influence
your trust (or distrust) in government
response during disasters?
9. What do you think are the long-term
effects of constantly being told to “stay
strong” after every calamity?
10. If you had the power to change one
thing about how resilience is used in
governance, what would it be and why?