SCHOOL OF POSTGRADUATE STUDIES
PROJECT / THESIS CORRECTIONS FORM
NAME: ABDI BASHIR AGANE REG. No: MBA/2024/58561
SCHOOL OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
section For official use only
S/No. Page/chapter Panelist Comments/observations Action taken to address Verification and Remarks
/section the comment/observation
in the
document
Revised the scope
section to consistently
Chapter Inconsistent listing of key digital include all five tools:
1 One: transformation tools; five tools ERP systems, e-
Variables / mentioned elsewhere but only four listed Procurement systems,
Scope (1.6) in the scope. EDMS, Automated
Revenue Collection
Systems, and IFMIS.
Chapter Separated limitations
One: and delimitations into
2 Limitations Blurring of limitations and
delimitations; unintentional limitations distinct subsections and
and revised content to
Delimitation mixed with intentional boundaries. clearly reflect their
s (1.7)
conceptual differences.
Strengthened the
problem statement by
Chapter incorporating Nairobi
One: Problem statement underdeveloped; County–specific
3 Problem relies on general citations with limited quantitative evidence
Statement Nairobi-specific evidence. (e.g., audit queries and
(1.2)
reporting weaknesses)
and clearly linking gaps
to the study’s novelty.
1
Revised assumptions to
Chapter be precise, study-
4 One: Assumptions are generic and lack
Assumption justification. specific, and aligned
s (1.8) with the study variables
and context.
Revised the section to
clearly indicate how
Chapter findings will support
One: Significance section is broad and lacks data-driven decision-
5 Significance practical specificity.
of the Study making, policy
(1.5) formulation, and system
reforms in Nairobi
County.
Added explicit linkages
Chapter showing how each
6 Two: TAM, DOI, and RBV are well chosen theory informs specific
Theoretical but not integrated. study variables and how
Framework the theories
complement each other.
Revised the empirical
review to include
Chapter thematic comparison,
Two: Limited critical analysis; studies are methodological
7 Empirical summarized without synthesis or
critique. critique, and
Review identification of
contextual and
empirical gaps.
Corrected section
Chapter Missing or misnumbered sections; jump numbering and inserted
8 Three: from Section 3.8.6 to 3.10, omitting 3.9. the missing Section 3.9
Structure
to ensure logical flow.
9 Chapter Inconsistency between use of Clarified the research
Three: Data questionnaires and mention of interview approach and revised
Collection data without details.
Instruments Section 3.6 to align
(3.6 & 3.8) instruments used with
the stated methodology,
including justification
or removal of
2
interviews.
Added justification for
selecting Kiambu
Chapter Kiambu County selected without
10 Three: Pilot adequate justification; pilot sample size County and clearly
Study not specified. specified the pilot study
sample size and
procedure.
Reconciled the research
Chapter design with analytical
Three: Descriptive design conflicts with
11 Research advanced inferential tests and regression techniques by revising
Design vs analysis. the design description
Analysis and justifying the use of
inferential analysis.
Added a detailed
Chapter description of the
12 Three: Thematic analysis mentioned but not thematic analysis
Thematic explained. process, including
Analysis coding procedures and
theme development.
Chapter Revised the regression
Three: model to incorporate
13 Regression Model omits moderator variables
included in Chapter Two framework. moderator variables
Model consistent with the
(3.8.6)
conceptual framework.
This section is to be completed after the defense
3
Corrections confirmed by:
Supervisors
Signature Date
Signature Date
Signature Date
School / Campus Postgraduate Coordinator
Signature Date
Dean of relevant School
Signature Date
Dean, School of Postgraduate Studies
Signature Date