0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views3 pages

Deriving the sd-Hamiltonian from Anderson Model

The document derives the sd-Hamiltonian from the Anderson impurity model, detailing the Hamiltonian's structure and the decomposition of the total wavefunction. It presents the matrix elements of the Hamiltonian and discusses the effects of virtual excitations, leading to an effective Hamiltonian acting on the subspace |1⟩. The final result is the sd-Hamiltonian, which incorporates interactions between the impurity spin and the itinerant electrons.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views3 pages

Deriving the sd-Hamiltonian from Anderson Model

The document derives the sd-Hamiltonian from the Anderson impurity model, detailing the Hamiltonian's structure and the decomposition of the total wavefunction. It presents the matrix elements of the Hamiltonian and discusses the effects of virtual excitations, leading to an effective Hamiltonian acting on the subspace |1⟩. The final result is the sd-Hamiltonian, which incorporates interactions between the impurity spin and the itinerant electrons.
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

In this problem we derive the sd-Hamiltonian from the Anderson impurity model.

The Anderson
Hamiltonian is given by
Xh † i X
H= ✏k ck ck + Vk d† ck + h.c. + ✏d nd + U nd" nd# (1)
k

where the operators d create electrons of spin at the localized impurity, and c†k creates an itinerant

electron of spin and energy ✏k in the metallic host. The total wavefunction of the Hamiltonian,
| i, can be written as the sum of three terms, | 0 i, | 1 i and | 2 i, where the subscript refers to the
occupancy of the impurity site. Using this decomposition, we can write the Schrödinger equation in
matrix form,
2
X
Hmn | ni =E| mi (2)
n=0

where Hmn = Pm HPn . The operators Pn are the projectors onto the subspace with n electrons on
the impurity site. They satisfy the relation P0 + P1 + P2 = 1, and are g given by
8 Q
>
< P0 = (1 nd )
P1 = 1 P0 P2 (3)
>
:
P2 = nd" nd#
Now, let’s find the matrix elements Hmn . The diagonal elements leave the occupation number
fixed, and they can be identified with the diagonal terms of the Anderson Hamiltonian,
8 P †
>
<H00 = Pk ✏k ck ck
H11 = k ✏k c†k ck + ✏d (4)
>
: P †
H22 = k ✏k ck ck + 2✏d + U
P
The off-diagonal terms are due to the hybridization term of the Hamiltonian, Hhyb = k (Vk d† ck +
h.c.). This term only contains one d operator, and therefore it can only connect states that differ by
one impurity electron. For this reason, H20 = H02 = 0. The other matrix elements can be found using
the explicit expressions of P0 and P2 ,

X
H10 = P1 Hhyb P0 = (1 P2 P0 )Hhyb P0 = Hhyb P0 = Vk d† ck (1 nd" )(1 nd# )
k
X X
= Vk d† ck (1 nd¯ ) = Vk d† (1 nd¯ )ck (5)
k k

X X
H21 = P2 Hhyb P1 = P2 Hhyb (1 P0 P2 ) = P2 Hhyb = Vk nd" nd# d† ck = Vk d† nd¯ ck (6)
k k

where we have used nd" nd# d†" = nd" d†" nd# = d†" nd# and nd" nd# d†# = d†# nd" . The other matrix elements
follow from Hmn = Hnm

,
( P
H01 = k Vk⇤ c†k (1 nd¯ )d
P (7)
H12 = k Vk⇤ c†k nd¯ d
We are interested in the effect of virtual excitations from the | 1 i subspace. Thus, we have to write
(2) only in terms of | 1 i. Using (2), we can formally write | 0 i and | 2 i in terms of | 1 i,

1
1
H00 | 0i + H01 | 1i =E| 0i ! (E H00 ) H01 | 1i =| 0i

1
H21 | 1i + H22 | 2i =E| 2i ! (E H22 ) H21 | 1i =| 2i

Now we have


1 1
E| 1i = H10 | 0i + H11 | 1i + H12 | 2i = H10 H01 + H11 + H12 H21 | 1i (8)
E H00 E H22

In order to simplify the above expression we have to commute the terms (E H) 1


and H. First,
we commute only the matrix elements,

X X
H00 H01 = Vk⇤0 ✏k nk ck0 0 (1 nd¯ 0 ) d 0 = Vk⇤0 ✏k c†k ( kk0 0 c†k0 0 ck )(1 nd¯ 0 )d 0

kk0 0 kk0 0
X X
= Vk⇤0 ✏k0 c†k0 0 (1 nd¯ 0 )d 0 Vk⇤0 ✏k c†k c†k0 0 ck (1 nd¯ 0 )d 0 = H01 (✏k0 + H00 )(9)
k0 0 kk0 0

X X X
H00 H21 = Vk0 ✏k nk d† 0 nd¯ 0 ck0 0 = Vk0 ✏k d† 0 nd¯ 0 nk ck0 0 = Vk0 ✏k d† 0 nd¯ 0 ( kk0 0 ck0 0 c†k )ck
kk0 0 kk0 0 kk0 0
X
= Vk0 d† 0 nd¯ 0 ck0 0 ( ✏k0 + H00 ) = H21 ( ✏k0 + H00 ) (10)
kk0 0

Using the above expressions it’s straightforward to obtain

X
1
(E H00 ) 1
H01 = H01 (E ✏k 0 H00 ) = Vk⇤0 ck0 0 (1 nd¯ 0 )d 0 (✏k0 ✏d E + ✏d + H00 ) 1

kk0 0

X ✓ ◆ 1 X
c†k0 0 (1 nd¯ 0 )d 0 E ✏d H00 c†k0 0 (1 nd¯ 0 )d 0
= Vk⇤0 1 ' Vk⇤0 (11)
✏k 0 ✏d ✏k 0 ✏d ✏k 0 ✏d
kk0 0 kk0 0

X
1
(E H22 ) 1
H21 = H21 (E + ✏k0 H22 ) = Vk0 d† 0 nd¯ 0 ck0 0 (E U 2✏d H00 + ✏k0 ) 1

kk0 0

X ✓ ◆ 1 X
d† 0 nd ¯0 ck0 0 E ✏d H00 d† 0 nd ¯0 ck0 0
= Vk 0 1 ' Vk 0 (12)
U + ✏d ✏k 0 U + ✏d ✏k 0 U + ✏d ✏k 0
kk0 0 kk0 0

where we have expanded the expressions in parentheses to leading order in U and ✏d . Plugging these
expressions in (8) we get

" #
X d †
(1 nd¯ )ck c†k0 0 (1 nd¯ 0 )d 0 c† nd¯ d d† 0 nd¯ 0 ck0 0
(E H11 ) | 1i ' Vk0 Vk⇤ + Vk Vk⇤0 k | 1i
✏k 0 ✏d U + ✏d ✏k 0
kk0 0

(13)
The one-particle terms nd¯ can be dropped, becuase they act on a single-particle subspace. If we
swap k and k 0 in the first term, we obtain

2
" #
X d† 0 ck0 0 c†k d c†k d d† 0 ck0 0
(E H11 ) | 1i = Vk Vk⇤0 + | 1i
✏k ✏d U + ✏d ✏k 0
kk0 0
2⇣ ⌘ ⇣ ⌘3
X 0 c†k ck0 0 d† 0 d c†k ck0 0 0 d† 0 d
= Vk Vk⇤0 4 + 5| 1i
0 0
✏k ✏d U + ✏d ✏k 0
kk
✓ ◆ !
X 1 1 X c†k ck0 nd
= Vk Vk⇤0 + c†k ck 0 0 d 0 d†
| 1i
U + ✏d ✏k 0 ✏k ✏d U + ✏d ✏k 0 ✏k ✏d
kk0 0 kk0

The last term in the second parenthesis is a constant, and can be absorbed into a shift of the
single-particle energy of the itinerant electron. This expression can be related to the spin operators by
using the Pauli identity,

↵ =2 ↵ ↵ (14)
In particular, we can rewrite

X X 1 X †
c†k ck0 0 d† 0 d = c†k↵ ck0 d† d ↵ = ck↵ ck0 d† d ( ↵ + ↵ )
0
2
↵ ↵
1 X † 1X † 1X †
= ck↵ ↵ c k 0 d† d + c c k 0 nd 0 = 2skk0 ·Sd + c ck0 n(15)
d 0
2 2 ↵ k↵ 2 0 k

P P
where Sd = 2 ↵ d†↵ ↵ d is the impurity spin and skk0 =
1
↵ c†k↵ ↵ ck0 is the lattice electron
spin. Using this result, we can finally write

!
X 1X † X c†k ck0
(E H11 ) | 1i = Jkk0 2skk0 ·Sd + c c k 0 nd 0 | 1i Vk Vk⇤0 | 1i
2 0 k U + ✏d ✏k 0
kk0 kk0
!
X X
= 2Jkk0 skk0 ·Sd + Kkk0 c†k ck 0 | 1i (16)
kk0

where
8 ⇣ ⌘
<Jkk0 = Vk Vk⇤0 1
+ 1
⇣ ✏ k ✏d U +✏d ✏k0 ⌘
Vk Vk⇤0 (17)
:Kkk0 = 1 1
2 ✏k ✏d U +✏d ✏k0

The total effective Hamiltonian acting on the subspace | 1 i is


" #
X † X X †
Hef f = ✏k ck ck + 2Jkk0 skk0 ·Sd + Kkk0 ck ck 0 (18)
k kk0
The energy scale of the typical excitations is much smaller than U +✏d and ✏d . Thus, we can neglect
the energy dependence of Jkk0 and Kkk0 . In that case, the interaction Jkk0 can be treated as local,
and the scattering term Kkk0 can be absorbed into a shift of the single-particle energy of the itinerant
electron. These approximations lead to the sd-Hamiltonian,
X †
Hsd = ✏k ck ck + 2JSd ·s(r = 0) (19)
k

You might also like