0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views14 pages

Principal Stresses and Strains Guide

This study guide covers principal stresses and strains in aeronautical engineering, detailing concepts such as Hooke's law for 3D bodies, plane stress conditions, and principal stresses and planes. It introduces methods for analyzing two-dimensional stress systems and the use of Mohr's circle for graphical representation of stress states. The guide includes references for further reading on aircraft structures and material strength.

Uploaded by

vinod kumar
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views14 pages

Principal Stresses and Strains Guide

This study guide covers principal stresses and strains in aeronautical engineering, detailing concepts such as Hooke's law for 3D bodies, plane stress conditions, and principal stresses and planes. It introduces methods for analyzing two-dimensional stress systems and the use of Mohr's circle for graphical representation of stress states. The guide includes references for further reading on aircraft structures and material strength.

Uploaded by

vinod kumar
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Department of Aeronautical Engineering

Chapter-2
Principal stresses and strains

Study Guide

Prof. Dubbaka Naveen


Aero, PIET
Parul University
1. Hooks law for 3D body ……………..………………...…........................................... 1
2. Plane stress and strain condition..………………….…………………………………….….. 3
3. Principal stresses and principal planes……………………………………………………….4
4. 2-Dimensional stress system………………………………………………………………………6
5. Stresses on an inclined plane……………………………………………………………………..6
6. Mohr’s circle……………………………………………………………………………………………….8
[Link] law for 3D body

Generally, except in cases of uniform stress, the direct and shear stresses on opposite faces of an
element are not equal as indicated in Fig. 2.1 but differ by small amounts. Therefore if, say, the direct
stress acting on the z plane is σ z then the direct stress acting on the z+δz plane is, from the first two
terms of a Taylor’s series expansion, σz +(∂σz/∂z)δz.

Fig2.1 Sign conventions and notation for stresses at a point in a body. (Source: Aircraft Structures
for Engineering Students by megson)

We now investigate the equilibrium of an element at some internal point in an elastic body
where the stress system is obtained by the method just described.
In Fig. 2.2 the element is in equilibrium under forces corresponding to the stresses shown and
the components of body forces (not shown). Surface forces acting on the boundary of the body,
although contributing to the production of the internal stress system, do not directly feature in the
equilibrium equations.

Aircraft Structure-1
1
Fig2.2 Stresses on the faces of an element at a point in an elastic body. (Source: Aircraft Structures
for Engineering Students by megson)

Aircraft Structure-1
2
[Link] stress and strain condition

Most aircraft structural components are fabricated from thin metal sheet so that stresses across
the thickness of the sheet are usually negligible. Assuming, say, that the z axis is in the direction of the
thickness then the three-dimensional case of Section 2.1 reduces to a two-dimensional case in which σ z,
τxz and τyz are all zero. This condition is known as plane stress; the equilibrium equations then simplify to

The triangular element of Fig. 2.3 at the boundary of a two-dimensional body of unit thickness is
then in equilibrium under the action of surface forces on the elemental length AB of the boundary and
internal forces on internal faces AC and CB.

Fig2.3 Stresses on the faces of an element at the boundary of a two-dimensional body. (Source:
Aircraft Structures for Engineering Students by megson)

Aircraft Structure-1
3
where l, m and n become the direction cosines of the angles that a normal to the surface of the
body makes with the x, y and z axes, respectively.

[Link] stresses, principal planes

For given values of σx, σy and τxy, in other words given loading conditions, σn varies with the angle θ
and will attain a maximum or minimum value when dσn/dθ=0.

(2.1)

Two solutions, θ and θ+π/2, are obtained from Eq. (2.1) so that there are two mutually
perpendicular planes on which the direct stress is either a maximum or a minimum. Further, by
comparison of (2.1) it will be observed that these planes correspond to those on which there is no shear
stress. The direct stresses on these planes are called principal stresses and the planes themselves,
principal planes.

Aircraft Structure-1
4
(2.2)

(2.3)

The maximum shear stress at this point in the body may be determined in an identical manner.

(2.4)

(2.5)

Here, as in the case of principal stresses, we take the maximum value as being the greater
algebraic value.
Comparing Eq. (2.5) with Eqs (2.2) and (2.3) we see that

(2.6)

Equations (2.5) and (2.6) give the maximum shear stress at the point in the body in the plane of
the given stresses. For a three-dimensional body supporting a two-dimensional stress system this is not
necessarily the maximum shear stress at the point.

Aircraft Structure-1
5
[Link]-dimensional Stress system
A two-dimensional stress system assumes that stresses act only in a plane (e.g., the x-y plane).
The state of stress at a point can be described using three components:

Normal stresses: σx (along the x-axis) and σy (along the y-axis).


Shear stress: τxy (on the x-face in the y-direction or vice versa).
These stresses are represented as:

[ σ x τ xy
τ xy σ y ]
This matrix describes the stress state at a point in the 2D plane.

[Link] on an inclined plane

The complex stress system of Fig. 2.2 is derived from a consideration of the actual loads applied to a
body and is referred to a predetermined, though arbitrary, system of axes. The values of these stresses
may not give a true picture of the severity of stress at that point so that it is necessary to investigate the
state of stress on other planes on which the direct and shear stresses may be greater.

Aircraft Structure-1
6
Fig2.4 Stresses on a two-dimensional element. (Source: Aircraft Structures for Engineering
Students by megson)

Figure 2.4 shows a complex stress system at a point in a body referred to axes Ox,Oy. All stresses
are positive as defined in Section 2.1. The shear stresses τxy and τyx were shown to be equal in Section
2.1. We now, therefore, designate them both τxy.
The element of side δx,δy and of unit thickness is small so that stress distributions over the sides
of the element may be assumed to be uniform. Body forces are ignored since their contribution is a
second-order term.
Suppose that we require to find the state of stress on a plane AB inclined at an angle θ to the
vertical. The triangular element EDC formed by the plane and the vertical through E is in equilibrium
under the action of the forces corresponding to the stresses shown in Fig. 2.5, where σn and τ are the
direct and shear components of the resultant stress on AB. Then resolving forces in a direction
perpendicular to ED we have

Fig2.5 stresses on an inclined plane at the point. (Source: Aircraft Structures for Engineering
Students by megson)

Dividing through by ED and simplifying

Aircraft Structure-1
7
Now resolving forces parallel to ED

Again dividing through ED and simplifying

[Link]’s circle
The state of stress at a point in a deformable body may be determined graphically by Mohr’s
circle of stress.
In Section 2.5 the direct and shear stresses on an inclined plane were shown to be given by

(2.7)

And

(2.8)

respectively. The positive directions of these stresses and the angle θ are defined in Fig. 2.6(a).

Fig2.6 (a) Stresses on a triangular element; (b) Mohr’s circle of stress for stress system shown in (a).
(Source: Aircraft Structures for Engineering Students by megson)

Aircraft Structure-1
8
Equation (2.7) may be rewritten in the form

Or

Squaring and adding this equation to Eq. (2.7) we obtain

1
which represents the equation of a circle of radius
2 √
(
2 2
σ x −σ y ) + 4 τ xy centre at the point ((σx −

σy)/2, 0).
The circle is constructed by locating the points Q1(σx , τxy) and Q2(σy , −τxy) referred to axes
Oστ as shown in Fig. 2.6(b). The centre of the circle then lies at C the inter section of Q1Q2 and the Oσ
1
axis; clearly C is the point ((σx − σy)/2, 0) and the radius of the circle
2√ 2 2
( σ x −σ y ) + 4 τ xy as required. CQ’

is now set off at an angle 2θ (positive clockwise) to CQ1, Q’ is then the point (σn , −τ) as demonstrated
below. From Fig. 2.6(b) we see that
ON=OC+ CN
Or, since

We have

But

Hence

Aircraft Structure-1
9
Which on rearranging becomes

as in Eq.(2.7). Similarly it may be shown that

The maximum and minimum values of the direct stress, viz. the major and minor principal
stresses σI and σII, occur when N(and Q')coincide with B and A, respectively.
Thus

Or

And in the same fashion

The principal planes are then given by 2θ = β(σI) and 2θ = β + π(σII).


Also the maximum and minimum values of shear stress occur when Q' coincides with D and E at
the upper and lower extremities of the circle.
At these points Q'N is equal to the radius of the circle which is given by

1
Hence τmax,min = ±
2 √
(
2 2
σ x −σ y ) + 4 τ xy as before. The planes of maximum and minimum shear

stress are given by 2θ = β + π/2 and 2θ= β + 3π/2, these being inclined at 45◦ to the principal planes.

Aircraft Structure-1
10
References:

1. Aircraft Structures for Engineering Students by Megson


2. Strength of Materials by Dr R.K Bansal

Aircraft Structure-1
11
Aircraft Structure-1
1

You might also like