Criminalization of Politics in India
Criminalization of Politics in India
CHAPTER 10
DEMOCRATIC PROCESS
OF POLITICS WITH CRIMINALS AND THE BUSINESS
10.1 NEXUS
10.2 ELECTIONS
STATUS
10.3 ELECTION COMMISSION:
STABILITY, DURABILITY
10.5 COALITION GOVERNMENT:
CORRUPT PRACTICE
10.6 GRASS ROOT DEMOCRACY
WITH
10.1 NEXUS OF POLITICS
CRIMINAL AND THE BUSINESS:
CRIMINALIZATION OF POLITICS
Synopsis
Introduction
What is criminalization of politics?o
Criminalization of Politics: Components and Causes
Government scams in the last few years
Right To Information Act And Criminalization Of Politics
Recent Development in Criminalisation Of Politics:
Persons can't fight from Jail
Conclusion
Introduction
"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely", this phrase
aptly explains the behaviour of our politicians. The politicians misuse their power
and position for their personal gain. The police which is expected to protect tn
rights and property of the citizens has reversed its role.
to
Police with the support of politicians twist and break the law according
their own will. Their ideal role is to follow the law and work accordingly bul
reverse attitude is observed where the police serve their political masterS
work according to their orders, thereby, undermining
the rule of law. They dothis
political
in order to pursue their own interests and serve the interests of their
masters. Ifany one of them dares to oppose them then they are threatened w
transfers, clearly reflecting the abuse of power by the political masters.
[366]
<br>
Such nexus between politicians, police and crime have changed the attitude
of people towards police and politicians. They fear that if they approach any
police authority for help they have to pay bribe for the help or may be subjected
to serious mental and physical torture and hence several instances go unre
ported.
Common people fear reporting against the influential as tiiey knowthat the
nrotection mechanism provided by law has weakened because the protectors no
more serve the law, they serve their greed. The people, by and large., regard the
nolice as agents and mouthpieces of the parties in power who can terrorise and
do allunjust and unlawiul things. The people in general believe that members of
the police force are incompetent, cruel and corrupt and have no will of their own.
They have departed from their moral values and function mostly for their per
sonal and selfish ends and serve their political masters.
This notion that has been created in the minds of the citizens clearly indi
cates that the rule of law has been defeated. The citizens have lost their faith in
public institutions. The makers andthe upholders of law have handled law ac
cording to their ownwill, thereby defeating the rule of law and upholding the rule
of their own whims and fancies. A gradual disbelief towards law will lead to
disobedience of law among individuals, thereby, defeating the spirit of democracy
and law in India. Such nexus has made law the playing field of a few ich people
and has taken it away from the reach of common people.
After 60 years of India's independence the lives of commoners is far worse
than under Britishers. The benefits of independence have reached only few, thus
creating disparity between the few ultra rich people surrounded by vast sea of
utterly poor. The rich people in nexus with those in power are getting favourable
laws enacted to suit their ends.
The criminalization of politics, executive judiciary is almost complete. The
corruption has spread its tentacles far & wide, there is corruption from womb to
tomb, from maternity hospital to grave yard. The injustices done by public ser
vants in the current scenario are worse than at the time of the British Regime.
The biggest factor behind it being the criminalization of politics.
even if he gets elected, the total salary he gets during his tenure as an MP/MLA
will be meagre compared to his election expenses. This is bridged publicly through
donations and secretly through ilegal means.
9There isa need of huge amounts of unaccounted for money that can only
<br>
be generated through criminal activity. That is why you have criminals in politics.
They have money and muscle, so they win and help others in their party win as
well.
(3) Vote Bank:
The political parties and independent candidates buy votes to ensure víctory
and indulge in other illegal activities through criminals or so called "goondas".
The criminals in a way help the politicians to win. This provides a congenial
cimate to political crime whereby the voters and manoeuvred, purchased, etc.
Criminals are wooed by political parties and given cabinet posts because their
msscle and money power fetches crucial votes. Elections are won and lost on
swings of just 1% of the vote, soparties cynically woo every possible vote bank,
including those headed by accused robbers and murderers.
(4) Corruption:
a
In every election all parties without exception put up candidates with crimi
nal background. The corruption has reached this stage because the corrupting
of the institutions in turn has finally led to the institutionalization of coruption. The
failure to deal with corruption has bred contempt for the law. When there is
contempt for the law and this is combined with the criminalization of politics,
corruption flourishes.
(5) Loop Holes In The Functioning Of Election Commission:
The Election Commission must take adequate measures to break the
nexus
between the criminals and the politicians. The forms prescribed by the Election
Commission for candidates disclosing their convictions, cases pending in courts
and so on in their nomination papers is a step in the right direction if it applied
properly.
Too much should not be expected, however, from these disclosures. They
would only inform people of the candidate's history and qualifications, but not
a
prohibit them from casting their votes, regardless, in favour of criminal. The gulf
between the Election Commission and the voter needs to be bridged. Common
people hardly come to know the rules made by the [Link]. Bridging this gap
is essential not only for rooting out undesirable elements from politics but also
for the survival of our democratic polity. The electorate have rnade certain wrong
choices in the past, but in the future national interest sheuld guide them in
making intelligent choices.
(4) Denial of Justice And Rule of Law:
Criminalization is a fact of Indian electoral politics today. The voters, political
parties and the law and order machinery of the state are a'i equally responsible
for this. There is very little faith in India in the efficacy of the democratic process
in actually delivering good govsmance. This extends to accepting criminalization
of politics as a fact of life. Effective laws are required for preventing criminals in
participating in the elections to prevent the criminalization of politics.
New Challenges
370 Indian Constitutional LW :The
no individual is at distr0SS and grief. However
result into an ideal statc wherg This cooperation between police and politi.
human grecd recogniseswrong nothig. thoir
reasons. The politicians in order to rnaintain staturee
cians is famous for all power. politicians reach that
Once the
position need money and muscle and as a result they fail to perform their
to
they tend to dictate terms support
police
advancement in their career. Tho
for SImooth
duties. Police necd political stronger and stronger and ultirnately they find
it
bond between them becomes ofher. Over the last decades, varioUS politirat
difficult to survive without cach force and prevented thern frorm enforcinr
to politicize the police country
parties have tried effectiveness in many parts of the
has lost its
law. The police force an trernd in India. Some of the hir
to show increasing
political-economiC systen of our
Corruption continues count
scandals that hav shaken the entire
are as follows:
were rneant for Kargí! war widoe
1. Adarsh scam, the buildings which
divided up between politicians and bureaucrats at very low
have been Ashok Chavan had plaver
prices. The former chief minister of Maharastra
a
major role in the scam.
2. 2G spectrum case, A. Raja, the former telecom
minister is the prime
come first serve' policy
accused. He did not follow the Government's 'first
in its real sense and went out of the
way to favour, certain telecom
crore to the Government.
companies. He caused a loss of 1.76 lakh
3. Indian Coal Allocation case, this
scam is in regards to Indian
h
Government's allocation of nation's coal deposit to PSU's and private
t companies. The scam happened under Manmohan Singh government
and came out in 2012. The basic premise of this scam was that wrongful
allocation of Coal deposits by Government without resorting to competitive
bidding, which would have made huge amounts to the Govern nent (to
tune of 1.86 Lakh crore). However, the coal deposits were allocated
arbitrarily.
4. Wakf Board Land case In March of 2012, Anwar Maniapddy, the
chairman of Karnataka State Minorities Commission submitted a
e
Sensational report which alleged 27,000 acres of land, which was controlled
by Karnataka Wakf Board had been allocated illegally or misappropriated.
The land managed by Wakf board, a Muslim charitable trust, is typically
donated to under-privileged and, poor, people of Muslim community.
However, the report alleged that nearly 50 percent of the land owned by
Wakf board was misappropriated by Politicians and Board members in
conjunction with real estate mafia at fraction of actual land cost. The
investigations for this are currently ongoing.
5. Commonwealth Games Case 2010, It is estimated that out of Rs. 70000
crore spent on the Games, only half the said amount was spent on
Indian sportspersons. The Central Vigilance Commission, involved in
probing the alleged corruplion in various Commonwealth Games-related
projects, has found discrepancies in tenders like payment to non
iT existent parties, will-ful delays in execution of contracts, over-inflatea
price and bungling in purchase of equipment through tendering -and
misappropriation of funds.
<br>
371
h
Democratic Processe ii
5. Telgi Case in 2002, Abdul Karim Telai had mastered the art of forgery
to banks and other
Pining duplicate stamp papers and sold them
Institutions. The tentacles of the fake stamp and stamp paper casecrore nad
was at a whooping Rs. 20000
penerated 12 states and a estimated
plus. The Telgi clearly had lot of support from government departments
stampS.
that were responsible for the production and sale of high security
I. Satyam Scam in 2009 Satyam is thecrore. biggest fraud in the corporate
history to the tune of Rs. 14000 The company's disgraced
everyone in the dark for a decade
former chairman Ramalinga Raju kept years and inflating revenues
by fudging the books of accounts for several
company was taken over by the
and profit figures of Satyam. Finally, the well to revive the brand
Tech Mahindra which has done wonderfully
Satyam.
8
Bofors Scam in 1980s & 90s
The Bofors scandal is known
as the hallmark of Indian corruption.
2.
in India in the
The Bofors scam was a major corruption scandal several others
1980s; when the then PM Rajiv Gandhi and were
including a powerful NRI family named the Hindujas, winning a bid
accused of receiving kickbacks from Bofors AB for
to supply India's 155 mm field howitzer.
a starliing report about
b. The Swedish State Radio had broadcast
an undercover operation carried out by Bofors, Sweden's biggest
arms manufacturer, whereby $16 milion were allegedly paid to
members of PM Rajiv Gandhi's Congress.
Most of all, the Bofors scam had strong cmotional appeal
a
C.
because it was a scam related to the defence services and
India's security interests.
9. The Fodder Scam-1990s "Chara Ghotala" as it is popularly known in
crore, an
the vernacular language is a coruption scandal worth Rs.900
unholy nexus was traced involved in fabrication of "vast herds of fictitious
livestock" for which fodder, medicine and animal husbandry equipment
was supposedly procured.
-
10. The Hawala Scandal 1990-91 This scam involved payments allegedly
received by country's leading politicians through Hawala brokers. Thus,
for the first time in ndian politics, it gave a feeling of open loot all around
the public, involving allthe major political players being accused of having
accepted bribes and also alleged connections about payments being
channe!led to Hizbul Mujahedeen militants in Kashmir.
It is evident that the politicians are doing nothing but serving themselves.
The politicians ignore the rule of law to pursue their own agenda. The politicians,
police and criminal nexus in India has resulted in loss of principies of the rule of
law. Rule of law which is the primary pillar of a democracy is being shaken by
such a nexus. The politicians who are elected are expected to work for those in
grief and not for their own greed, but this is what is not observed. Promises that
are made during elections are never kept. The poor and the needy get swayed
<br>
New Challcnges
372 Indian Constitutional Law: Thc
most powerful weapon of voting
away by such promises, and thereby lose their overpowers the problems of the
politicians
Once power is achieved, grecd of the
citizens.
mission/ other authorities, as the case may be. These authorities are not
erly verifying these affidavits. Many scams, scandals are coming to light day
in
& day out, politicians are accusing each other of involvement in Scams. W'ereas,
the said authorities are keeping mum, as if those affidavits filed by tainted public
servants are true. The tainted public servants are not even providing full, right
information to public as per RTI Act, lest the truth come out.
This seen is very normal now a day that some public servants, caught red
handed during luxurious spending, they easily say that it is at their political party's
expense or their well wisher's expense. However no entries are found in the
account books of said parties to that respect.
The law forbids public servants from accepting gits, hospitality, favours beyond
,
the value of rupees one hundred (Rs. 100 ) as it may be a form of bribe. But
one may ask allthese under RTI. Right to Know is an inherent attribute of every
peizon. Right to know differs only in one sense with right to information. Right
to kncw is a natural right and right to information is a provision given by govern
ment to its cople. Natural rights do not have any value egally until they are
legally considercd. Hence right to know as such implied in the freedom of speech
and expression which is a legally considered right must have to be given a
special value. Right to information as such vill bring transparency of the govern
ment activities and allow the people to find remedies for those things by which
they suffered.
<br>
Conclusion
India, bcing the largest democracy in the world, has to take certain stringent
steps to break such nexus between the politicians, police and [Link] The
main steps are to be taken up by the citizens who have been given will the
to choose their own govemment. A
proper choice exercised by them lead to
a better future, The politicians should be made to understand that it is the law
that rules them and not vice-versa. The "rule of law" has to be always upheld
whatever may be the circumstances.
Thus, from the instances mentioned above it can be clearly seen that there
is a visible neXus between the politicians, police and criminals which needs to be
broken at the earliest so as to protect the objective of Rule of Law.
Comuption severely undermines national, social and economic development.
Indeed, corruption often leads to national collapse. Corruption has led to bad
roads and decaying infrastructure, inadequate medical services, poor educational
standards and disappearance of foreign aid and foreign loans. In order to uphold
the rule of law the roots of corruption have to be eradicated. This can be done
by making the system more transparent.
Transparency can be achieved by making people aware of the decisions
taken by the politicians and asking them to play a role in such decision-making
process. This would make the politicians more accountable and the fear of law
can be imbibed in them. Certain amendments are needed such as prescribing
minimum educational qualifications for anyone to be eligible as a politician thereby
reducing influx of politicians with criminal background like Shibu Shoren, into the
system and hence saving the political system from the shadow of crime.
The rule of law can be protected by increasing the powers of the judiciary.
The judiciary should be given more powers to scrutinize the acts of the politi
cians. They should be made more observant towards the political systemmore and
should be treated at par with the parliamentarians. Making the judiciary
<br>
REFERENCES
[Link], LECTURES ON ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, 16-17(3rd ed.2003)
[Link] REDDY, DIMENSIONS OF CRIME AND CORRUPTION IN INDIA
84(1ed.2005).
Supriya Bharadwaj, Ruchika Girhotra Case: Molestation of Minor, Abuse of power,
Times Of India, December 23, 2009
Indira Jaising, Slamming The Doors Of Justice on Women, Indian Express, January
20, 1999
Rajshri Mehta, Adarsh Society Scam: Deshmukh, Shinde, Rane are all in it too, DNA,
October 31, 2010
Rajesh Ahuja, ED To Grill Radia, Hindustan Times, November 24, 2010
MATHUR KRISHNA MOHAN, POLICE LAW AND INTERNAL SECURITY 119
120(1ed.1994).
Emily WNax, With Indian Politics The bad
Gets Worse, WNashington Times, July 24,
2008
srideep@[Link]
nidhisorni15@[Link]
Bartoi Curt R. (2001).
Criminal behavior - A
Psychosocial Approach, fifth edition,
REFORM OF THE ELECTORAL LAWS Prentice Hall lnc.
May 1999), Law Commission (Report No. 170)[1999] INLC 170 (1
of IndiaReports.
Representation of the People's Act, 1951
National Election Watch, Lok
Sabha Analysis, http:/[Link]/files/new!
pdfs/Lok%20Sabha%20high%20level%20analysis.
pdf
National Election Watch, -
Post Election Analysis, http:/[Link]/economy/
general/post_election.pdfn i
p M
Bakshi (2009).The Constitution of
India, Universal LawPublications.
http:/[Link]
<br>
aherl }
Democratic Process12sn' tottsati 375
10.2 ELECTION
SYNOPSIS
e
Meaning9oot epnotnd
Historical Background to
Characteristics Of Elections
e
Suffrages
Nomination
Electoral Systemeo0
Scheduling
Election campaigns
Indian Electoral System
Election Commission
Electoral process
Important Considerations Regarding Elections
Ink
-B1 cnoito:O Indelible 3
Government expenditure
Electronic voting machines ho
sit i3yiuerOVoter verifiable paper audit trail system
NOTA
Elections: Problems and DifficultiesiiC
Meaning
formal decision making process by which a population chooses an indi
A
vidualto hold a public office is called as election. Since the 17 century elections
have been the usual operative mechanism for a representative democracy. This
mechanism to fill offices has been used by the legislative, executive, judiciary,
private organization, clubs, corporations, etc.
p
It is used as a tool for selecting representatives in modern representative
democracies Electoral reform describes the process of introducing fair electoral
systems where they are not in place, or improving the fairness or effectiveness
of existing
[Link] vissueu ia vihaa
ioliPsephology is the study of results and other statistics relating to elections
(especially with a view to predicting future results).To elect means "to choose or
make a decision". E) On Eiei D
isiOuO :0K3 tiKi
<br>
Challengcs
Indian Constitutional Law The New
:
376
Historical Background
to as early in history as ancient
History of elections can be traced back period to select rlers
Greece and ancient Rome, and throughout the Medieval
and the Pope.
such as the Holy Roman Emperor organization
Raja (chiefs) of Gana (a tribal
a
In Vedic period of India, the yarma
by the Gana. The raja belonged to the noble Kshatriva
was apparently elected
a son of the previous Raja. However
(warrior class), and was typically In the Chola Empire palo
the Gana members had the final say in his elections.
leaves were used for selecting the village committee members. The leavesith sh
candidate names writtenvoung on them, were put inside a mud pot. To select
boy was asked to take out as many leaves as the
committee members, as the Kudavolai system. Ancion#
number of positions available. This was known
Arabs also used election to choose their caliph in the early medieval period
The modern "election", which consists of public elections of government
officials, didn't emerge until the beginning of the 17th century when the idea
of representative government took hold in North America and Europe.
Characteristics of Elections
Suffrage
The question of who may vote is a central issue in elections. The electorate
does not generally include the entire population; for example, many countries
prohibit those judges mentally incompetent from voting, and all jurisdictions re
quire a minimum age for voting.
Suffrage is typically only for citizens of the country, though further limits may
be imposed. However, in the European Union, one can vote in municipal elec
tions if one lives in the municipality and is an EU citizen; the nationality of the
country of residence is not required.
Insome countries, voting is required by law; if an eligible voter does not cast
vote, he or she may be subject to punitive measures
a.
such as a fine.
Nomination
representative democracy requires a procedure to govern nomination for
A
political office.
Electoral systems
Electoral systems are the detailed constitutional arrangements
systems that convert the vote into a political decision. and voting
votes, for which various vote counting systems The first step is to tally the
systems then determine the result on the basis of and ballot types are used. Voting
categorized as either proportional or majoritarian.
the tally. Most systems can be
While openness and accountability are usually considered cornerstones a
of
democratic system, the act of casting a vote and the content of a voter's ballot
are usually an important exception. The secret ballot a
is relatively modern devel
opment, but it is now considered crucial in most free and fair elections, as it limits
the effectiveness of intimidation.
<br>
Scheduling
are accountable to the
The nature of democracy is that elected officials
neople. and they must return to the
voters at prescribed intervals to seek
reason most demOcratic constitutions
their mandate to continue in ofice. For that This is called as sched
nrovide that elections are held at fixed regular intervals.
is a variety of schedules, for example presidents: the President of
ulina, There of
India is elected every five
years, the President of Russia and the President
every five years, President of the
Finland every six years, the President of France
years.
United States every four
Election campaigns
supporters attempt to influ
When elections are called, politicians and their in what are called
ence policy bycompeting directly for the votes of constituents organized or loosely
for a
campaign can be either formally
campaigns. Supporters
advertising. The most expensive elec
affiliated, and frequently utilize campaign on
tion campaign included US$7 billion
spent the United States presidential elec
billion spent on the Indian general elec
tion, 2012 and is followed by the US$5
tion, 2014.
are indirectly elected, this being achieved by the votes of legislators in the state
are chosen under the sys
and union (federal) territories. The elected members vote.
temof proportional representation by means of the single transferable
The 12 nominated members are usually an eclectic mix of eminent artists
(including actors), scientists, jurists, sportspersons, businessmen and journalists
and common people.
Election Commission
EIn India it is an autonomous, constitutionally established federal authority
responsible for administering all the electoral processes in the Republic of India.
Under the supervision of the commission, free and fair elections have been held
<br>
on exposure to liaht
inkcontains silver nitrate, which on reaction with the nail and
not been altered since
nots darker. the basiC chemical frmula of this ink has
1952.
Government expenditure was Rs 17, a twenty-fold
The cost per voter in the 2014 general elections
incregse over the first election, held in 1952. The total expenditure for the 2014
Rs 3600 crores; the 1952 election cost Rs 104.5 rnillion
general election was
total.
Electronic voting machines
Electronic voting machines (EVM) are being used Indian
in general and state
elections and in total
olections to implement electronic voting in part from 1999 casting a vote and
in both
cince 2004 elections. The EVMs reduce the time system.
paper ballot
declaring the results compared to the old
Voter verifiable paper audit trail system
On 14 August 2013, the Government of India amended the elections rules
(VVPAT) system.
to permit the use the Voter-verified paper audit trail
NOTA
in India that would allow
"None of the above" is proposed voting option
a
to register an official
voters whosupport none of the candidates available to them Court of India
vote of "none of the above". On 27 September 2013, Supreme
Right to Negative Vote by
pronounced a judgement that citizen's of India inhave
EVMs and ballot papers. The
exercising None of the above (NOTA) option Civil Liberties, an
judgment was passed on a PIL filed by the People's Union for
NGO in 2009.
of "none of the above"
The Election Commission has implemented this optionstarting
voting option in EVM machines w.e.f. five states polls from November
2013. However it does not mean that if 'NOTA' gets highest votes then election
will be conducted again, rather even in that case, the candidate with the
highest
votes will be treated as elected candidate.
New Challcnges
380 Indian Constitutional Law: The
2. Unfair rules
ofopposition candidates from eligibility for office,
This can include exclusion are some of the wave
for electoral suCcess
and manipulating thresholds
can to favour a specific faction or candidt
structure of an election be changed
3. Interference with campaigns
in power may arrest or assassinate candidates, Suppress or even
Those headquarters, harass or beat cami
criminalize campaigning, close campaign
violence.
workers, or intimidate voters with
4. Tampering with the election
mechanism
how to vote, violation
This can include confusingor misleading voters about
ballot stuffing, booth capturing, tampering with voting ma.
of the secret ballot,
voter registra
chines, destruction of legitimately cast ballots, voter suppression,
tion fraud, failure to validate voter residency, fraudulent tabulation of
results, and
use of physical force or verbal intimation at polling places.
Equally this list is only some of the ways in which it
can occur, other ex.
amples may include persuading candidates into not standing against them. Some
examples include: blackmailing, bribery, intimidation or physical violence.
Elec
REFERENCES
Basu, Durga D. (2009). "11". Introduction to the Constitution of India. Nagpur, India:
LexisNexis Buttervworths Wadhwa Nagpur. p. 199. ISBN 9788180335599.
"Lok Sabha: Introduction" [Link]. Retrieved 19 August 2011.
Rajya Sabha Secretariat. "Council of States (Rajya Sabha)". The national portal of
India. Parliament of India. Retrieved 26 May 2012.
Shashi Tharoor (16 April 2009). "The recurring miracle of Indian democracy". New
Straits Times
"Number of registered voters in India". [Link]. Retrieved 23 Febru
ary 2014.
Indian General Election Expenditure, from ECI website accessed 14 May 2006. Lok
Sabha Secretariat. "Lok Sabha". Parliament of lndia. Retrieved 26-May 2012.
"Lok Sabha Election Facts: Candidate Seat Ratio
1996" [Link].
increased from 4 in 1952 to 25 in
"A Constitutional Body', Election Commission
of India.
"Election Expenditure per elector up by twenty times in
General Elections". PIB. 11 March 2014. Retrieved 2009 compared to first
12 March 2014.
R"EC Decides to use VVPAT System at Bye-Election in Nagaland" (Press release).
Press Information Bureau, 17 August 2013. Retrieved 18
August 2013. i ehh
"EVM-paper tral introduced in 8 of 543 constituencies".
ber 2014. dna. Retrieved 23 Novem
Press Trust of India (29 April 2014). "LS polls:
Voters to get 'automated-receipts' at
Gandhinagar", [Link]. Retrieved
23 November 2014.
Staff Reporter. "VVPAT
machine to be on demonstration for 10 days". The Hindu.
Retrieved 23 November 2014.
"VVPAT to be introduced in Jadavpur
constituency. [Link], Retrieved 23
November 2014.
<br>
Election Commission
which is responsible for
Election Commission of India is a constitutional body
maintenance of the electoral procedure in the country. The Constitution of
the superintendence, direc
India has vested in the Election Commission of Indiathe
tion and control of the entire
process for conduct of elections to Parliament and
Legislature of every State and to the offices of President and Vice-President of
a permanent Constitutional Body. It was
India. Election Commission of India is on 25th January 1950.
established in accordance with the Constitution
control of elec
According to Article 324, "Superintendence, directin and
tions to be vested in an Election Commission".
of the preparation of the
1(1) The superintendence, direction and control all elections to Parliament and to
electoral rolls for, and the conduct of, to offices of President
the Legislature of every State and of elections the
and Vice President held under this Constitution shall be vested in a
otste Commission (referred to in this Constitution
as the Election Commission)
Commis
(2) The Election Commission shall consist of the Chief Electionany,
as the
sioner and such number of other Election Commissioners,
if
President may from time to time fix and the appointment of the Chief
<br>
: New Challenges
382 Indian Constitutional Law The
Commissioners shall, subiers
Election Commissioner and other Elcction by Parliarment, be mardo
to the provisions of any law made in thaf behalf
by the President so appointed the Chief Elo
Commissioner is
When any other Election
(3)
Commissioner shall act as the Chairman of the Election Cornrnieo e
tion
election to the House of the People and to
(4) Before each general the first general elacti
Legislative Assembly of each State, and before
to the Legislative Councit of
and thereafter before each biennial election may also appoint afar
each State having such Council, the President Commission
consultation with the Election Commission such Regional in
ers as he may consider necessary to assist the Election Commission
on the Commission by claueo
the performance of the functions conferred
(1)
conditione
(5) Subject to the provisions of any law made by Parliament, the
of service and tenure of office of the Election Commissioners and
the
Regional Commissioners shall be such as the President
may by rule
not be
determine; Provided that the Chief Election Commissioner shall
removed from his office except in like manner and on the like grounds
as a Judge of the Supreme Court and the conditions of service of the
Chief Election Commissioner shall not be varied to his disadvantage
after his appointment: Provided further that any other Election Commis
sioner or a Regional Commissioner shall not be removed from office
except on the recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner
(6) The President, or the Governor of a State, shall, when sO requested by
th Election Commission, make available to the Election Commission or
to a Regional Commissioner such staff as may be necessary for the
discharge of the functions conferred on the Election Commission by
clause (1)
Parliament with two-thirds majority in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha on the grounds
of proven misbehaviour or incapacity. Other Election Commissioners can be
removed by the President on the recommendation of the ChiefElection Commis
sioner.A Chief Election Commissioner has never been impeached in India
So. the Election Commission shall consist of Chief Election Commissioner
andsuch other Election Commissioners as the President may from time to time
fix. They are appointed by the President subject to the provisions of
any law
made by Parliament for the purpose. (Article 324 (2).
The President may also appoint after consultation with Election Commission
such Regional Commissioners as he may consider necessary to assist the Elec
tion Commission in its function. (Article 324 (4).
Mr. O.P. Rawat has been appointed as Election Commissioner of India in
the year 2015.
Condition of Service, appointment and Tenure of Com
missioners
Ts2The conditions of service and tenure of office of the election commissioners
may by rule deter
and regional commissioners shall be such as the President
The
mine. These rules, however, are subject to law made by the Parliament.
Chief Election Commissioner can be removed from the office just like the
re
aSupreme tio Court Judge.
moval of
The conditions of service of the Chief Election Commissioner cannot be varied
to his disadvantage after his appointment from office by the President. Other
election commissioners can be removed on recommendation of CEC. Therefore,
they are free and fearless in the perfomance of their duties.
to
The President or the Governor on the request of the EC make available
few staff
the EC such staff as necessary. Thus the EC commission shall have govern
of its own. It can demand necessary staff from the Center and the State
ments whenever required.
In S. S. Dhanoa v. Union of India AlR 1991 SC 1745 the SC held that
Election commissioners cannot be placed on a par with the Chief Election Com
Mr.
missioner in terms of power and authority. The court dismissed the petition of
S. S. Dhanoa challenging his removal from the post. It was held that the remnoval
of the two ECS wer 'not in the case of premature termination of service' but it
was
a case
of the abolition of the posts with termination of service as a consequence.
Hence, the termination nof service was not open to challenge on ground of
illegality. The court said that the protection available to CEC were not available
either to the EC and therefore their condition of service can be varied even to
their disadvantage.
Multi-Member Commission: The decision to make the Election Commission
a
multi-member one was made by the Government due to Some controversial
decisions taken by the CEC T.N. Seshan that had created serious conflict be
tween the Election Commission and the government in 1993.
v. Union of India (1995) 4 ScC
In a significant judgment in T.N. Seshan
611 a five judge constitution bench of the SC upheld the validity of the act
with that
equating the status, power and authority of two electioi commissioners
<br>
: Ncw Challcnges
384 Indian Constitutional Law The
T. N. Seshan. The validity of the act
was
Commissioner, Mr.
of the Chief Election on the ground that it was arbitrary, unconstitu
challenged by Mr. T.N. Seshan was done because the ruling party was
tional, and void. He also alleged that this
with him as he had insisted on strict compliance with model code of
unhappy to Curtail his poWwers. However. tha
so this act was an endeavour
Conduct and
held that the CEC does not enjoy a status
judges delivering the judgement
324 provides for multi-member body
superior to other ECs. The scheme of Article
ECs.
comprising the CEC and the
According to J. Ahmadi, "nobody
can be above the institution which he ic
institution; he can onlv exist
supposed to serve. He is merely the creature of theas mightier than the institution
if the institution exists and to project the individual
would be grave injustice."
The Indian President appoints Chief Election Commissicner
and Election
Commissioners, They have tenure of six years, or up to the
age of 65 years.
as
whichever is earlier. They enjoy the same status and receive salary and perks
Commis
available to Judges of the Supreme Court of India. The Chief Election
sioner can be removed from office only through impeachment by the Indian
Parliament.
(4) The campaign period was reduced by the Election Commission from 21
to 14 days for Lok Sabha and Assembly elections to trim down election
expenditure.
(5) Moreover, Election Commission takes details of the candidate's assets
on affidavit at the time of submitting nomination paper.
The Commission also functions as a quasi-judiciary body in case of electoral
disputes and other matters involving the conduct of elections.
stitution that the Chief Election Commissioner shall not be removed from his
office except in like mnanner and on like grounds as a Judge of the Supreme
Court and conditions of his service shall not be varied to his disadvantage after
his appointment. The other Election Commissioners cannot be removed from
office except on recommendation of the Chief Election Commissioner.
: New Challenges
386 Indian Constitutional Law Thc
3t }
Democratic Proccssssth 387
In so far as the terms and conditions of service [Link] ECs are concerned,
the President was given full authority to docide upon thesame by framing rules.
The relevant constitutional provisions simply laid down the manner of removal of
the CEC. This provision was found necessary to ensure the independent func
tioning of the Commission, by insulating it from executive control.
Clearly, the aim of having an independent and impartial clection machinery
would have been defeated had the executive been in a position to simply remove
the CEC.
Therefore, it may be inferred that there is as such no lack of constitutional
protectionto the ECs. The constitutional protection enjoyed by the CEC may not
be expressly provided to the ECs, but the manner of removal of both the CEC
and the ECs does not appear to give scope for any mala fide action that may
affect the independence of the Commission.
In NP Punnuswami v. Returning Officer, Namakkal Constituency the SC
laid down the requisites of an election machinery to include:
There should be a set of rules and laws making provisions to all matters
in relation to elections. It should be decided as to how these rules are
to be made.
There should be an executive charged with the duty of securing the due
conduct of elections.
There should be a judicial tribunal to decide all disputes arising in con
nection with elections.
Part XV of the Constitution deals with elections. The second requirement is
satisfied by Article 324, while Articles 327 and 328 deal with the first. Article
329 deals with the third one.
New Challengcs
38S Indian Constitutional LIW :The
: New Challenges
390 Indian Constitutional Law The
of any democracy
ensure free and fair elections which is a essential element
The important points
are summarized below:
Appointment of Election Commissioners
Commissioner and Election
The President appoints Chief Election
Commissioners.
They have tenure of six years,
or up to the age ot 65 years, which.
ever is earlier.
are eguiva.
The status, salary and perks of election coriimissioners
of India.
lent to Judges of the Supreme Court
can be removed from office onlv
The Chief Election Commissioner
through impeachment by Parliament.
in consultation
Other members can be removed by the President
with the Chief Election Commissioner
in
The President may appoint Regional Election Commissioners or
consultation with the CEC before elections to the Parliament
Assemblies. The regional election commissioners resign after the
elections
The Chief Election Commissioner cannot hold any office of profit
after retirement.
The Chief Election Commissioner cannot be reappointed to the post
Powers of the Election Commission
The EC enjoys complete autonomy and is insulated from any
interference from the Executive
It also functions as a quasi-judiciary body regarding matters
related to elections and electoral disputes
Its recommendations are binding on the President of India
However, its decisions are subject to judicial review by High
Courts and the Supreme Court acting on electoral petitions
During the election process, the entire Central and state
government machinery (including paramilitary and police
tesalse forces) is deemed to be on deputation to the Commission
The Commission takes effective control of government per
Sonnel, movable and immovable property for successful
Conduct of elections
Functions of the Election Commission
Demarcation of constituencies
Preparation of electoral rolls
Issue notification of election dates and schedules
h
Scrutiny of nomination
papers of candidatesA
Scrutiny of election expenses
to political parties
Allot symbols and accord recognition
regarding disquali
Render advice to the President and Governors
fication of MPs and MLAS
party campaigns
Allot schedules for broadcast and telecast of
imposed by
Grant exemptions to persons from disqualifications
judicial decisions
REFERENCES
Constitutional Law by J.N. Pandey
"A Constitutional Body". Election Commission of India.
"A Constitutional Body". Election Commission of India.
[Link]
[Link]
[Link]
[Link] com/todays-paper/tp-opinion/[Link]
"India devises flawless ballot mechanism".
"VVPAT used or the first time in Noksen bypolls"
[Link] com/news/national/electior. commission-okays-nota-option/
[Link]
htp://timesofindia. [Link]/india/NOTA-to-be-provided-in-general-elections/
articleshow/[Link]
"Now, 'NOTA' hes an electoral symbol too". dna. 18 September 2015. Retrieved 18
September 2015.
Jain, Bharti (18 September 2015). "None of the Above' option on EVMS to carry its
own symbol from Bihar polls".The Times of India. Retrievec: 18 September 2015.
"Contesting the Bihar Polls? Dummy Candidates Beware"
"Now, photos of candidates on EVMs to weed out 'dummies".
"Polls near, but no data of voters with disabilities". Times of India. 27 January 2014
"97?7????? ?? 2?? ????? 7??? ????? ????". Punjab Kesari. 26 January 2014.
A
Critical Study Of The Position Of The Chief Election Commissioner In The Light Of
Cases Such As Ss Dhanoa V. Union Of India And Tn Seshan V. Union Of India
Author :Mr. Ashwini Chawla E33 ii
<br>
New Challengcs
392 Indian Constitutional Law: The
Introduction
A coalitiongovemment is a cabinet of a parliamentary government in which
Several political parties cooperate, reducing the dominance of any one party within
that coalition. The usual reason given for this arrangement is that no party on its
Owncan achieve a majority in the parliament. A coalition government might also
be created in a time of national difficulty or crisis, for example during wartime,
or economic crisis, to give a govemment the high degree of perceived political
legitimacy, or collective identity it desires while also playing a role in diminishing
internal political strife.
When a general election does not produce a clear majority for asingle party.
parties either fom coalition cabinets, supported by a parliamentary majority.
or minority cabinets which may consist of one or more parties. Cabinets based
on a group of parties that commands a majority in pardiament tend to be more
stable and long-lived than minority cabinets. While the former are prone to inter
<br>
393
bsel Democratic ProcCSsss
nal struggles, they have less reason to fear votes of no Confidence. Majority
as
governments based on a sinale party are typically even more stable, as long
their majority can be maintained.
is elected
Coalition cabinets are common in countries whose parliament
by proportional representation, with several organized political parties
often rep
by the executive
resented. They are rarer in countries in which the cabinet is chosen
coalition
rather than by a lower house, such as in the United States (however,
cabinets are common in Brazil).
a govern
Advocates of proportional representation suggest that coalition
ment leads to more consensus-based politiics, as government Comprising
a dif
optima outcome on its own: rather, cOoperation with one or more otherermer actoe
is necessary. Coalition theories purport to shed light on why alliances
why they take the forms they do, how they endure, and why they collarpse
politioot
Much of coalition theory embraces the basic assurmptions of rational
behaviour. Faced with dilemmas about how to maximize gains through coopera
tion with one or more other parties, rational political actors will weigh preferen
con.
tially ordered alternative strategies and consistently pursue coalition options
nected with more preferred outcomes.
jority of votes and seats. Coalitions therefore occur, often between two
parties, Sometimes based on the cooperation of three or more parties.
or
On occasion, a minority government can be formed. The partyor parties
Comprising such a government hold half the number of seats less, but
are allowed to govern as iong as the majority agrees to their actions. The
particular system in place matters, as for instance in NewnoZealand, where
two especially large parties result, leaving them with other options
one of
than to form government together or to form government of
a
the two large parties with several small parties. The system found
in
most Scandinavian countries delivers many parties, but these include
a
three or four larger parties who can often create government with just
two parties.
a parliamentary
Grand coalition is coalition government in multi-party
a
C.
in a coalition. The
system where the two largest political parties unite
are two dominant
term iS most Commonly used in countries where there a
of smaller
parties with different ideological orientalions and number
parties large enough to secure representation the any
in parliament. The two
large parties will each try to secure enough seats
in election to have
a
a majority government alone, and if this fails each will attempt to form
orientation.
Coalition with smaller parties that have similar ideological
a
on major ideological
Because the two large parties will tend toor differ
even
ssues, and portray themselves as rivals, sometimes enemies,
agree on a common direction for
they will usually find it more difficult to
a combined government with each other than with smaller parties.
d. Popular front is broad coalition of different political can
a groupings, often
very broad, they sometimes
made up of leftists and centrists. Being as well as socialist and
include centrist and liberal (or "bourgeois") forces scope
are larger
communist ("working-class') groups. Popular fronts
in
than united fronts, which contain only working-class groups.
Indian Scenario
were the first two
The erstwhile States of Travancore-Cochin and PEPSU
1953-67,
states in the country to form Coalition Governments in 1952. During
were formed ir Andhra Pradesh, Orissa and
three more coalition governments
Kerala.
in 1967, eight states formed Non-Congress C alition Governments, and they
were: Kerala, West Bengal, Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh,
rose to fourteen. Among
Bihar and Orissa. In 1997 the Coalition Governments
states Kerala has had the longest stable Coalition Government with West Bengal
standing second.
In Centre the Congress was replaced by Janata Party which was union of
came to power at the Centre
several parties in 1977. Again coalition government
in 1989 when V.P. Singh became prime minister with support both from the Right
and the Left. The Central also entered in the coalition phase in 1996, having
was coalition in ature. The United
formed the first United FrontGovernment
Front led by Deve Gowda also did not complete its full life as outside support was
<br>
1a
withdrawn by Congress. Then Atal Bihari Vajpayee's Government fell after
days of its regime due to vote of non-confidence
In 1990's India evidenced
a
lot of drama in the Central Government stage
Coalitions led by different paties would appear and fall. In 1998, Atal Bihai
AlADMK
Vajpayee's Government fell due to the ruckus created by Jayalalitha of
The coalition Government was ditched by her resuited in vote of non-confidence
held on 14th April 1999 where the Government fell short of
one vote with 269 and
270 votes against it. The NDA coalition was single government with the Same
a
prime minister and no intervening election or resignation. The stability of the NDA
coalition, 1999-2004, can be explained by a combination of the surplus majority
of its legislative coalition and territorial compatibility, indeed, mutual electoral
interdependence, of the constituent parties of this iegislative coalition due to
state-level electoral arithmetic, and the impossibility of constructing an altemative
coalition, given the lack of necessary numbers, of non-BJP and non-Congress
parties, taken together, and likewise, the impossibility of constructing a Con
gress-led coalition given the rivalry between the Congress and most regional and
Left parties at the state level and the fact that the Congress had only 114 seats.
The NDAgovermment was in effect a surplus majority coalition by my alternative
conceptualization. Earlier, in August 2000, when the Trinamul Congress left the
coalition, Prime Minister Vajpayee was unfazed as it did not threaten his legis
lative majority. Prime Minister Vajpayee was therefore, acting like the leader of
a secure surplus majority coalition whose partners and external supporters had
no other choice, and not like the leader of an insecure minority coalition. This
surplus majority character of the legislative coalition, combined with the territorial
compatibility and mutual electoral interdependence of its partners, most having
clearly demarcated state strongholds not overlapping with others, gave the NDA
a de facto surplus majority coalition status and an
extraordinary stability.
Advantages of Coalition
The disadvantage of single party majority leadership is that the Government
of the time being confident of its own strength allows
passage through Parliament and these are the laws it frames a
made functional with insufficient debate,
majority having already consented to the "leaders" views.
Coalition politics over
Comes this defect by having to reconcile
much wider public opinion, both in
terms of policy and geography, as reflected in
the covenants of different parties
coming together to provide the Government of the county.
Political Homogeneity: In a coalitional Government ministers are invariably
drawn from different political parties and hence they represent
contradictory viewpoints. In coalition politics different different and even
policy advocacy groups,
who are also part of the Government, bring to on
bear pressures
that finally impact on its policy initiatives and make wayforGovernment
If all those who are in charge good of the maximum.
of policy framework are indoctrinated by the same
leadership and by the same doctrine, the possibility of merger
of various thoughts
and possibilities becomes remote and this leads to possible
of various policy initiatives as may have been adverse implications
the case in first few decades Of
India's freedom. It appears that whereas coalitions mav be a
burden to the lead
<br>
party in politicCs, those could be an asset in the area of economics and natiori
building, in general.
Increased Growth Level: Multi-party Governments may be seen as a poS
sible solution to vertically raise the level of growth, as has actually been observed
in Indiaover thepast few years. The weakening of single party Governments has
been accompanied by strengtheningof the economy, since there has been greater
inter-play of diversity of opinion, and greater reconciliation between divergent
policy orientations.
More Democratic: Coalition government is more democratic, ard hence
fairer, because it represents a much broader spectrum of a public opinion than
government by one party alone. In almost all coalitions, majority of citizens
voted for the parties which form the government and so their views and interests
are represented in political decision-making.
Better Governance: Coalitions provide good government because their a
de
cisions are made in the interests of a majority of the people. Because wide
consensus of opinion is involved, any policy will be debated thoroughly within the
more
government before it is implemented. Single-party government is much
likely to impose badly thought-out policies upon parliament and people, perhaps
in the UK).VWhen
for narrowly ideological reasons (for example, the poll tax
or over an
difficult or histcric decisions have to be taken, for example in wartime,
Union or NATO, the consent of
issue such as membership of the European
politicians representing
a
wide range of interests and opinion is important in
committing the country and its people to difficult but
necessary courses of ac
tion.
Disadvantages of Coalition
a) a coalition system the Head of State is always liable to find him playing
In
a more active role in Government formation.
a
b) It is possible to maintain collective responsibility within coalition cabinet
with Prime Minister as the keystone. But it is harder to achieve this ideal
in a coalition Governmnent that in a single party Government.
c) The Prime Minister of a coalition Government is neither able to select his
Colleagues nor exercise control over him.
d) coalition Government is likely to be less able to afford breaches of
A
New Challenges
398 Indinn Constitutional Lay: The
94 ministers. Big cabinets as
a good Cxample of big cabinets which had causes more
to accommodale all the allies of coalition. This
formed only
money of the taxpayers.
of a
coalition gOvornment have to depend on each
h) Sinilarly, members
to maintain the coalition and, thuS, further their individual interocte
other a party with the highest number of MPs necde
In acoalition government,
of the co8
to depcnd on the allics with much lesser MPs for the sake
lition.
The biggest disadvantage of a coalition
government is that the end procduct
depicted is very unstable and vulnerable
as the Core element of the coalition hae
to keep up with all the promises made to its partners and do the
impossible.
or her. By doing so the
make everyone happy with the platter offered to him programs. A
government has to sacrifice on various key policies and important
take
succession of undisciplined activities, horse-trading events and defection narrow
place which lowers the public morality, all just to serve to each party's
political interests.
Coalitions provide bad government because they are unable to take lon.
a
on hand-in-hand, where the former is built by a junk of the latter. This was
introduced keeping in view of the unethical defections which happencd during the
nast. Political leaders often being rcferred as opportunist tend to change their
narties in search of money and power. Members who are elected only because
of the party will turn rebel against their own party to join a party which is short
of members to form a Government.
This antivirus has been used many times in the past to curb defection:
a
CONCLUSION
a mnay call themselves as allies but are
The concerned parties of coalition
can put
actually opportunists. You present them with an issue which, if pursued,
to grab it, pressurize
them in an advantageous position, they will not think twice
the government, bargain totheir advantage, and then
tom-tom about their achieve
ment to secure larger vote banks. In the process, one party gets side-lined while
the other takes the driver's seat.
any coalition, members of one
Compromise is another name for coalition. In
to stay together.
party often have to compromise with their ideologies and ethics
political
Our politicians use the coalition name to safeguard their vested
interests and to blackmail each other in the coalition. Recent
years we have seen
coalition governments getting threats from the coalition
party of ditching the
Government to fulfill their political goals.
A
coalition with a common manifesto without
any threatening from any sides,
working with a common goal is a dream of today and
tomorrow. National parties
often tend to exploit the weaker regional parties
as they have had less action in
the national scene before.
At the root of it all is the fact that the public votes for regional parties often
born on shoddy principles of caste, religion, language, region and gender. Caste
politics should see an end to experience the brighter light of democracy.
or
Minority coalitions propped up by external support whether conditionally
unconditionally, are not likely to be stable.
Factional splits tend to be accommodated in the pursuit of office-seeking
interest. Surplus majority or large-size coalitions are stable than minimal-winning
Coalitions. Coalition between an anchor party and satellite parties tend to be
stable.a
of the
With these even though coalition represents the democratic face
a
long lasting life would not at all be a problem for
Nation, a coalition with
country
Governance. Repeated elections do not show the democratic face of the
but shows the poor sustainability of coalitions Government and
vulnerability of
Governments to give in to allies which also causes tax payers money.
<br>
Powers of Panchayats
Problems and prospects of Panchayati Raj institutions
Weaknesses of Gram Panchayats
Conclusion
Introduction
The Indian democratic structure includes three levels of governance - na
tional or federal, state or regional, and the grassroots level called the Panchayati
Raj and Nagar Palika systems.
The Panchayati Raj system covers the village, the Tehsil and the district, and
the Nagar Palika system serves towns and cities, If democracy means peopie s
participation in running their affairs, then it is nowhere more direct, clear and
significant ihan at the local level, where the contact between the people and their
representatives, between the rulers and the ruled is more constant, vigilant and
manageable.
Lord Bryce said: "The best school of democracy and the best guarantee tor
its success is the practice of local self-government",
Decentralisation is a prime mechanisnthrough which democracy becomes
truly representative and responsive. The democratic ideuls of decentralization,
development, and increased, continuous and active popular participation in the
process of nation-buildingcan be secured only throughthe working of an efficient
system of local government. Without a well organized system of local govern
ment, no democratic political system can be expected to become stable arnd
really developed.
<br>
Ncw Challcngcs
402 Indian Constitutional Law: The
a three-ticr system oí Panchaya Rai
in 1957. The committee recommended
from village iu iie dricvel
-
Gram Panchayat at the village level, Panchayat
at district level.
the
Samiti at the block level and Zilla Parishad
Raj was
As per the Balwant Ray Mehta Committee Scheme, Panchayati
launched on 2nd October 1957 in Nagaur district of Rajasthan. Andhra
Pradesh
and many state governments followed Rajasthan. Yet, by the mid-sixties
the hype
to strengthen the Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) gave way to
a
growing ten
zero.
dency of centralization and the PRIs descended to ground
a
in 1977, the Janata Government iried to revive the PRIs. Accordingly
committee headed by Ashok Mehta was appointed to review the working of the
PRIs. The conmillee Suggested a minor change in the Balwant Ray Mehta
heme. The three tier system of PRIs was to be replaced by a two tier i.e. Zilla
Parishad at the district level and Mandal Panchayat (consisting of a number of
villages) below it. In addition, the committee also recommended the creation of
Nyaya Panchayat. However, owing to the disintegration of the Janata Govern
ment in 1980, the recommendations of the Asoka Mehta Committee could not be
implemented.
For tlhe next five years or So, no progress was made. One committee under
the chaimanship of G.V.K. Rao reported in 1985, suggesting appropriate im
provement in the representative character and strengthening of the capability of
the people's representatives and administrative personnel in the PRIs. In 1986,
the L.M. Singhvi Committee of the Department of Rural Development, Govern
ment of India, recommended constitutional status for Panchayati Raj.
women, reservation of seats for SC/ST in proportion to their population in all the
positions of the three tiers, establishment cf Gram Sabha for enhancing people's
participation for their own development, and establishment of planning committee
for local bodies; and an earmarked list of 29 items under 11th schedule.
More than fifty percent of these grassroot representatives are from the down
trodden and marginalized sections of the society, namely women (one third of the
tota), the sCs, STs and OBCs (as per their proportion of the population). This
kind of constitutional provision has created a scope for accompiishing develop
ment with social justice, which is mandate of the newPanchayat FRaj sysiem. The
new system brings all those who are interested to have voice in decision making
through their participation in Panchayat Raj Institutions. The Panchayati Raj
system is basis for the "Social Justice" and "Empowerment" of weaker section
on which the development initiative have to be built upon for achieving overall,
tWO parts:
human welfare of the society. The local self government is divided into
Rural Level
Village Panchayat
Block Development Committee or Taluka Samiti
Zilla Panchayat or Zilla Parishad
Urban Level
Nagar Panchayat for towns
Municipal council for small cities
Municipal Corporations for big cities.
state legislatures will make
These will form the third tier of govemment. The
Municipalities and conferring
their own laws for establishing Panchayats and
for villages. States with less than
hem with powers and authorities Panchayats
2 million population do not need Panchayats.
at grass root level by inserting
These provisions are a sanction to democracy
the two new parts relating to Panchayats
and Urban Local Bodies. These have
been discussed in detail below:
Local Bodies In Rural Area: The Panchayats
a new part lX consisting of 16 articles
The 73rd Amendment in 1992 added
and the 11th schedule to the Indian
Constitution. It is entitled as The Panchayats'
to 243-0 According to it the Gram
and consists of provisions from Articles 243
System to perform functions and
Sabha is the foundation of Panchayati Raj a Panchayati
powers entrusted to it by the legislature. It provides for three-tier
RajSystem in village, intemediate and district level.
Areas with population less
level. The Panchayat will have
than 20 lacs need not constitute the intermediate
after the lapse of this
t
3 a
assured duration of 5 years, with election mandat0y
period.
Constitutional Provisions regarding Panchayats
Definitions as per Article 243
context otherwise requires,
In this Part, unless the
<br>
perform such functions at the village level as the Legislature of a State may, by
law, provide.
Constitution of Panchayats Article 243B: There shall be constituted in
every State, Panchayats at the village, intermediate and district levels in accor
dance with the provisions of this Part.
Notwithstanding anything in Clause (1), Panchayats at the intermediate level
may not be constituted in a State having a population not exceeding twenty lacs.
D
Composition of Panchayats Article 243C:
1. Subject to the provisions of this Part, the Legislature of a State may, by
law, make provisions with respect to the composition of Panchayats:
Provided that the ratio between the population of the teritorial area of a
Panchayat at any level and the number of seats in such Panchayat to be
filled (by] election shall, so far as practicable, be the same throughout the
State.
2. the seats in a Panchayat shall be filled by persons chosen by direct
All
election from territorial constituencies in the Panchayat area and, for this
purpose, each Panchayat area shall be divided into territorial constituen
cies in such manner that the ratio between the population off each con
stituency and the number of seats allotted to it shall, so far as practi
cable, be the same throughout the Panchayat area.
3. The Legislature of a State may, by law, provide for the representation -
[Link] io S a) of the Chairpersons of the Panchayats at the village
level, in the
Panchayats at the intermediate level or. in the case of a State not
having Panchayats at the intermediate level, in the Panchayats at the
district level;
b) of the Chairpersons of the Panchayats at the intermediate level, in
the Panchayats at the district level:81t 22
<br>
c) of the members of the House of the People and the Members of the
Legislative Assembly of the State representing constituencies which
comprise wholly or partly Panchayat area at a level other than the
village level, in such Panchayat;
d) of the members of the Council of States and the members of the
Legislative Council of the State, where they are registered as elec
-
tors within
i.
a Panchayat area at the intermediate level, in Panchayat at the
intermediate level;
a Panchayat area at the district level, in Panchayat at the district
level.
a
The Chairperson of Panchayat and other members of Panchayat
a
in
whether or not chosen by direct election from territorial constituencies
the Panchayat area shall have the right to vote in the meetings of the
Panchayats.
-
5 The Chairperson of
manner as
a) a
Panchayat at the village level shall be elected in such
the Legislature of State may, by law, provide; and
a
elected
b) a
Panchayat at the intermediate level or district level sha!l be
by, and from amongst, the elected members thereof.
Reservation of seats Article 243D -
1
Seats shall be reserved for
a) the Scheduled Castes; and
b) the Scheduled Tribes, in
every Panchayat and the number of seats
SO reserved shall bear, as nearly as
may be, the same proportion to
Panchayat
the totalnumber of seats to be filled by direct election that
in
area or
as the population of the Scheduled Castes in that Panchayat
area bears to the total
of the Scheduled Tribes in that Panchayat
may be allotted by rotation to
population of that area and such seats
different constituencies in a Panchayat.
2
Not less than one-third of the total number of seats reserved under
women belonging to the Scheduled
clause (1) shall be reserved for
Castes or, as the case may be, the Scheduled Tribes.
for women
3 Not less than one-third (including the number of seats reserved
total
belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes) of the
every Panchayat shall
number of seats to be filled by direct election in
be reserved for women anda such seats
may be allotted by rotation to
different constituencies in Panchayat.
4. The offices of the Chairpersons in the Panchayats at the village
or any
other level shall be reserved for the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled may, by
a
Tibes and women in such manner as the Legislature of State re
law. provide: Provided that the number of offices of Chairpersons
served for the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes in the
may be,
ST Panchayats at each level in any State shall bear, as nearly as
<br>
New Chllcnges
406 Indian Constitutional Law: The
in the Panchayats
samne proportion to the total number of such offices or
the Scheduled Castes in the State
at each level as the population of the population of the
Scheduled Tribes in the State bears to the total
of the one-third of the total number of
State: Provided further that not less than
at each level shall be reserved
offices of Chairpersons in the Panchayats
for under this clause shall
Provided aiso that the number of offices reserved
Panchayats at each level.
be allotted by rotation to different
(1) and (2) and the reservation
5. The reservation of seato Under Clauses
for women) under
of office of Chairpersons (other than theonresevai.n
Clause (4) shall cease to have effect the expiration of the period
specified in Article 334.
a from making
6. Nothing in this Part shall prevent the Legislature of State
any provision for resevation of seats in any Panchayat or offices of
Chairpersons in the Panchayats at any level in favour of backward class
of citizens.
Duration of Panchayats, etc. Article 243E:
1. Every Panchayat, unless sooner dissolved under any law for the time
being in force, shall continue for five years from the date appointed for
its first meeting and no longer.
2.
No amendment of any law for the time being in force shall have the effect
of causing dissolution of a Panchayat at any level, which is functioning
immediately before such amendment, till the expiration of its duration
specified in Clause (1).
3. An election to constitute a Panchayat shall be completed -
a) before the expiry of its duration specified in clause (1);
b) before the expiration of a period of six months from the date of its
dissolution: Provided that where the remainder of the period for which
the dissolved Panchayat would have continued is less than six months,
it shall not be necessary to hold any election
under this clause for
constituting the Panchayat.
4 A Panchayat constituted upon the dissolution of a Panchayat
before the
expiration of its duration shall continue only for the remainder of the
period for which the dissolved Panchayat would have
continued under
Clause (1) had it not been so dissolved.
Disqualifications for membership Article 243F
person shall be disqualified for being
A
GRAM SABHA
A. Zilla Panchayat
Itextends over a district and is the highest level. Each block Panchayat
under a ZP elects one/two/three members directly (depending on number of
voters within it). Presidents of all the Block Panchayats are also ex-officio mem
bers of the ZP. In some states the Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA) and
Member of Parliament (MP) of the district/constituency are also ex-officio mem
bers. It prepares plans for development of its district. It works for social and
economic welfare of people.
B. Block Panchayat or Panchayat Samiti:
Each Gram Panchayat under a Block Panchayat elects one/two/three mem
bers directly to the Block Panchayat. GP pradhans are ex-officio members of the
Block Panchayats. This organization works for the development of a Block
C. Gram Panchayat:
A Gram as defined under the Act (meaning a [Link] a
cluster of villages)
is divided into a minimum of five constituencies (again depending on
of voters the Gram is having).
the number
A
gram Sabha is a general body of a village. It
includes all men and women above the age of 18 years. Their names should be
in the voters list. It by direct election
elects the Panchayat. The Sarpanch is also
directly elected by the Gram Sabha. Body of these elected members is
called
the Gram Panchayat. Size of the GPs varies widely from state to state. In states
like West Bengal, Kerala etc. a GP has about 20000 people on an average,
whle
in many other states it is around 3000 only.
D. Gram Sabha:
In most of the states, each constituency of
the members of the Gram
Panchayat is [Link] Gram Sabha and all the voters of
are members of this body. A gram a
the same constituency
Sabha is general body of a village. t
includes all men and women above the age of 18 vears. Their names should be
<br>
in the voters ist. However, in some states this is called Ward Sabha/Palli Sabha
etc. in West Bengal it is called Gram Sansad (village parliament). Gram Sabha
in West Bengal has a differcnt meaning. Here all the voters of the Gram Panchayat
as whole constitute the Gram Sabha
a
ticie 243S
1. There shall be constituted Wards Committees, consisting of one or more
Wards,within the territorial area ofa Municipality having a population of
three lacs or more.
2. The Legislature of a State may, by law, make provision with respect to
ont n a. the composition and the territorial areaof a Wards Committee:
b. the manner in which the seats in a Wards Committee shall be
ii h2nes filled.
3.
A member of a Municipality representing a ward within the territorial area
of the Wards Committee shall be a member of that Commmittee.
4. Where a Wards Committee consists of -
a. one ward, the member representing
that ward in the Municipality;
or
b. two or more wards, one of
the members representing such
wards in the Municipality elected by the members of the Wards
Committee,
shall be the Chairperson of that Committee.
5. Nothing in this article shall be deemed to prevent the Legislature
of a
State from making any provision for the Constitution of Committees in
addition to the Wards Committees.
d
Democratic Proccss
ts 413
of the Scheduled Castes in the Municipality area or
of the Scheduled
Tribes in the Municipal area bears to the total population
of that area and
such seats may be allotted by rotation to different constituencies in a
Municipality.
p2. Not less than one-third of the total number of seats reserved under
Clause (1) shall be reserved for women belonging to the Scheduled
Castes or as the case may be, the Scheduled Tribes.
3. Not leSs than one-third (including the number of seats reserved for
women belonging to the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes of
the total number of seats to be filled by direct election in every Munici
pality shall be reserved for women and such seats may be allotted by
rotation to different constituencies in a Municipality.
4. The officers of Chairpersons in the Municipalities shall be reserved for
the Scheduled Castes, the Scheduled Tribes and women in such man
ner as the Legislature of a State may, by law, provide.
5. The reservation of seats under Clauses (1) and (2) and the reservation
of offices of Chairpersons (other than the reservation for women) under
Clause (4) shall cease to have effect on the expiration of the period
specified in Article 334.
6 Nothing in this Part shall prevent the Legislature of a State from making
or offices of
319 aiany provision for reservation of seats in any Municipality citi
Chairpersons in the Municipalities in favour of backward class of
zens.
of Municipalities etc.
Powers, authority and responsibilities
Artizle 243W
Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a State may,
-
by law, endow
a. the Municipalities with such powers and authority as may be neces
sary to enable them to function as institutions of self-government and
such law may contain provisions for the devolution of powers and
responsibilities upon Municipalities, subject to such conditions as may
be specified therein, with respect to -
i. the preparation of pians for economic development and social
justice;
the performance of functions and the implementation of
ii.
schemes as may be entrusted to them including those in
relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Schedule;
b. the Committees with such powers and authority as may be necessary
to enable them to carry out the responsibilities conferred upon them
including those in relation to the matters listed in the Twelfth Sched
ule.
Democratic Process b
415
ties, tolls and fees in accordance with such procedure and subject to
such limits:
b. assign to a Municipality such taxes, duties, tolls and fees levied and
collected by the State Government for such purposes and subject to
such conditions and limits,
C. provide for making such grants-in-aid to the Municipalities rom the
Consolidated Fund of the State; and
d. provide for constitution of such Funds for crediting all moneys received.
respectively, by or on behalf of the Municipalities and also for the with
drawal of such moneys there from, as may be specified in law.
Challenges
416 Indian Constitutional Law: The New
or in
may, by law, make provision with respect to all matters relating to,
connection with, elections to the Municipalities.
ro 9o3imtno3
Continuance of existing laws and lunicipalities} Article 243ZF
Notwithstanding anything in this Part, any provision of any law relating to
Municipalities in force in a State immediately before the commencement of the
Constitution. (se:enty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1992, which is inconsistent with
the provisions of this Part, shall continue to be in force until amended or repealed
by a competent Legislature or other competent authority or until the expiration of
one year from such commenCement, whichever is earlier:
Provided that all the Municipalities existing immediately before such com
mencement shall continue till the expiration of their duration, unless sooner dis
solved by a resolution passed to that efect by the Legislative Assembly of that
State or, in the case of a State having a Legislative Council,
n
by each House of
the Legislature of tliat State! 10
iii0 13 wigd
2rath under] Article 243ZA shall not be called in question in any Court;
abat D no election to any Municipality shallbe called in question excert by an
election petition presented to such authority and in such rnanner as iS
provided for by or under any law made by the Legislature of a State.
Features of
the New Panchayati Rai Svstem normcolsv
The 73 rd Constitutional Amendment Act envisages Gramsabha as the foun
<br>
dation of the PRI system to perform the functions of and powers entrusted to it
by the state legislatures. The amendment provides for a three- tier PRI syslern
at thevillage, intemediate and district levels. Small states with population below
20 lakh have been given the option to not to constitute the intermediate level. The
Act provides that the Panchayat bodies will have an assured duratiorn of 5 years
with mandatory elections after this period. Ec
However it might be noted that under the Act the establishmenf of Panchayat
on the PRIs are vested in
and the devolution of necessary powers and authority
state governments. In view uf this it may be said that the success of the PRIs
as a unit of democracy and thereby ushering an all round development of rural
areas will much depend on the intention and support of the state governments.
Without sincere intention and political will these institutions would be misused by
rural elites and the poor and illiterate masses. will remain as mute supporters.
e
Powers and Functions Of Panchayatstonut ovocte stt
alie9Subject to the provisions of this Constitution, the Legislature of a Siate may,
endow the Panchayats with such powers and authority as may be necessary to
enable them to function as institutions of self-government and such law may
contain provisions for the devolution of powers and responsibilities upon
Panchayats at the appropriate level, subject to such conditions as may be speci
fied therein, with respect to:
1. The preparation of plans for economic development and social justice;
1sv 2. The implementation of schemes for economic development and social
justice' as may be entrusted to them including those in relation to the
riue ievmatters listed in the Eleventh Schedule. The matters listed in 11th Schedule
are as follows:
a. Agriculture and extensioi:
b. Land improvement
C. Watershed development
d. Animal husbandrv, Poultry and Diary
e. Fisheries, Social foresiny and small scale industries
Fural Housing, Khadi, Drinking water and Sanitation
eimtnes [Link] Health etc 'owers to impose iiXes and
Funds.
Powers of Panchayats
Article 243 H empowers the legislature of a State to authorize a Panchayat
to levy, collect and appropriate such taxes, duties, tolls and fees in accordance
with such prbcedure and subject to such limits and assign to a Panchayat
such
taxes, duties, tolls and fees levied and collected by the State Government for
such purposes and subject to such Conditions and limits. More over the articie
provide for making such grants-in-aid to the Panchayats
from
Fund of the State. The PRIs are entitled for Constitution ofthe Con:liiated
suct Funds for
crediting all moneys received, respectively, by or on betialf of
also for the withdrawal of such money from the Fanchayats and
the funds
Article 2431 provides for,
1
The establishment of a Finance Commnission for reviewing
sition of Panchayats. The Governor oi a state financial p0
shallwithin one year from
the commencement of the Act, constitute a Finance
2.
Commission.
li shall be the duty of the finance Commission to the principles, which
should govem- The distribution between
the State and the Panchayats of
thenet proceeds of the taxes, duties, tolls and fees leviable by the State,
which may be divided between them
under this Part and the allocation
between the Panchayats at al! levels of
proceeds;
their respective shares of such
3. The delciminauon of
the taxes, duties, tolls
assigned to, or appropriated by, the Panchayat;and fees which may be
Fanchayats from the Consolidated Fund of The grants-in-aid to the
the State;9rfei!
4. The measures needed to improve tie financial position
of the Panchayats,
<br>
423
A
oritical review of the 73rd Amendment and the aSsessment of the wavs in
which different States have followed or resisted the stipulations outlined in the
4003 reforms reveals that the grass root democraCy in India still sufferc from
three limitations- federal constraints, a resistant bureaucracy and local elite cao
ture.
Roviewing experiences from, different states, siudies conducted by Over.
Seas Development
Institute [ODI] gives some propositions about the conditions
can lead to improved accountability for poor and
under which decentralization are:
marginai groups in society. They
1. Active participation among broad elemenis of society, involving
activities such as vating, campaigning, attending meetings, run
ning for office, lobbying represutatives, etc.
2. Fiscal and political support from higher level authorities within
legitimacy
rneonb oitt 3. Ihe. existence of competitive political parties whose
poor.
on the suppot of the
6bnt boucivor depends at least in pat
to nut orit 4.0Deeper economic transformations, which embolden traditionally,
subordinate groups to challenge local authority [Link]
CI 1 According to C. S. Prasad, "In
a
democratic set-up the role of individual is
important but where a community has become depressed, it is the corporate
efforts of men that alone holds promise for any remarkable progress. The 'Gram
Panchayat' has, therefore, a special. relevance for the Indian situation today in
a
which the individual finds himself reduced to a much too insignificant phenom
enon to go it alone. In the march of prosperi.y, he has but to make himself a part
of some organized medium". The organized medium can be nothing but the
panchayats. These panchayats can effectively deal with the countless problems
the village life is beset [Link]
ou
According to some studics it has been shown that political activism to imple
ment PRs the unequal social structure and rigid caste system prevalent in lndian
villages coupledwith power-hungry local bureaucracy kill the spirit ofthe system.
Unfortunately in some other states lack nf political will and administrative
apathy killed the real devolution of power sVy
G0 t617
Yet another problem connectéd to this is had been the love-hate relationship
between the local level bureaucracy and the elected represeritative of PRIs. Botn
use to move in different directions, due to lack of proper co- ordination and clarity
of functions More over there is also a tendencytowarcs Doit cization of local
o
Weaknesses of Gram PanchavatsnE I13qolavsb fysil:uarinco ni
The Gram Panchayats have worked near, acles in maany fields but there
are certain weaknesses of Panchayats too.
0291
Firstly, most of the representatives do not have the requisit e cation and
training to lgok after the varied functions of Panchayats effectively or to shoulder
Lne executive, judicial or socia responsiilit!!
10 iOilS/\i7TI0h D17 i .F4
<br>
Conciusion
India has the largest concentration of rural population than any other country
in the world. Development of villages is development of country. It is the dream
of every Indian tosee a developed India. But it is hard to build a developed India
if we ignore the 70 percent of rural India and keep them away from the fruits of
development.
Panchayati Raj has changed drastically after the 73rd amendment. It is
especially the founding values and specific objects of the new constitutional
amendments that had an unprecedented impact. In the welfare state like India
and in ie wake of introduction of various development programmes, administra
tion is expected to function as a catalytic agent of development and change. It
is more so at tne grassroots level; it becomes highly rolevant in items of redress
and amelioration cf grievances of the common-man, and proper use of resources,
so that the ideal of bridging the gaps among various sections becomes possible.
It is a matter of common belief that the administration at the grass root level
has not measured up to the expeiation of the general masses. It is so, because
of the fact that either it i under heavy influence of political leaders or it treats
itself as the top brass of the society and fails to develop confidence among
masses for a rural development. An assessment of the role of administration is
important in more than one way in this context. The founding fathers of Indian
Constitutio nave laid solid ideological foundations sovereignty,
democracy, SO
cialism, secularism, equality and justice. Though at the level of performance,
the.e are certain deficiencies therein.
Eventually, there are questions about the viability and role of administration
as instrument of development. However, it is important to analyze
whether rural
bureaucracy has acquired the status of a nevw class in itself or it is successful
in contributing to development administration. To
deal with these issues, we have
to pay particular attention to both the content of what can be called developmnent
and to the interpretation of democracy.
B
To reach a viable Panchayats three hurdles have to
be overcome. These
have remained what they always have been.
First, is the domination of the bureaucracy over the PRIs. The agent for
implementation of all major programmes has-been the bureaucracy. Various parallel
<br>
hodies such as the DRDA have grossly undermined the importance of the PRIs.
Either they have to be disbanded or made accountable to the PRIs.
Second is the lack of adequate financial resources to cary vut the admin
istration. grant-in- aids is the major component of the PRis revenue. This need
A
REFERENCES
Wikipedia
The Constitutional Law by J.N. Pandeyioisil 1o ..2ilvw i; l: xirs/s
Democracy and Development at Grassroots in indiai71
Impact Factor(JCC): 1.4507
-
This article can be downloaded [Link]. us}2
from Drinking Water
Asthana Anand N., (Aug 2008),'Decentralization and Corruption:[Link] 3, p.182.2.
Sector Public Administration and Development, Vol. 28, Issue
Bardhan Pranab & Mooikharjee Dilip, (2007),'Decentralization and Local Governance in
Developing Countries: A Ccmparative perspective, OXFORD University Press, New
Delhi, Chatterjee Somnath, (May 2008),'For a new deal to the rural poor, The Hindu, Monday!
May 03, 2008, p.10.4.
Dash Siddhartha, (2007),'Panchayati Raj: Grassroot Democracy,' 'Orissa Review',[Link]-Mar.
of Information and Public Relations, Govt. of Oriss, Bhubaneshwar,
2007,0 11-13.5.2
Dhaliwal s. s., (2004), Good governance in Loca! self-Government', Deep & Deep Publication
Pvt. Ltd.,New Delhi, P.10.6. 0
2inevon etnic ott
biG 2 wsh e t
Gupta Dipankar, (1995),Political Sociology in India -Contemporary Trends, [Link]: Orient
Longman, p.36.7.
IIPA,Strengthening of Panchayats in India: Comparing Devolution across. States, Empirical
Malviya H. D., (1974), Village Panchayat in India', Al india Congress Committee, New Delhi,
p.16.9.
Ministry of Panchayati Raj, Government of India.(Official Website). 10.1VI 90 biOW 193
Mishra A. K. & Other, (2011),"Role of the Panchayati Raj Institution in Rural Development: An
Analyticai Studyof Uttar Pradesh', SMS, Varanasi, p.47.11.
Rai B. C., Local Government', SeH, New Delhi, 1976.12.Nt3 01riovSz 191s iuE
Sen Amartya, (2009),The ldea of Justice, England: Allen Lane & Penguin Group, .346.13.01
Sharda Mridula, (2010),'Evolution of Panchayati Raj in India: From Traditional toK
ConstitutionalizePànchayats,' Kanishka Publishers, New Delhi, p.105.14.
ptven
i3ii:o jyiiaaioit1sa
Thwari A. N.. (2010), Role of Panchayati Raj nstitutions in Good Governance and Welfare
Delivery. Sundar .Ram (ed), 'Grassroots Planning
G
&
Local Governance in India', Kanishka, New
Delhi, p.3.15
)32i1iiOVSI
[Link],com/.iessay-on-panchayatí-raj-the-soul-of-democracy 1. 229 i2091
Zody Richard E., (198O),'The Quality of Rural Administration'
.Public:Administration Review, Vo.. 40,Number 1, January-February, p.13.
Intervievw with Mani
Shanker lyer, Frontline, May21-June 3. 2003. [Link]/fline!
f12211/stories 3 Introduction to the Constitütion of India, [Link]. [Link]
3
Constitution of India, 73rd Amendment Act, 1992 [Link]/amend:13 O
Panchayati Raj institutions play a crucial role in promoting grassroots democratic governance in India by devolving power and responsibilities to local bodies. This decentralization increases political participation by involving people in decision-making processes affecting their communities. It empowers marginalized sections by reserving seats for women and SC/ST categories, fostering social justice and inclusivity. Furthermore, by planning and implementing local development schemes, Panchayats enhance accountability and efficiency in governance, directly addressing local economic and social needs .
Vesting Panchayats with the authority to impose taxes and collect funds as per Articles 243H and 243J can lead to several consequences. Positively, it empowers local self-governance, allowing Panchayats to cater to local needs and priorities using locally generated resources. It can enhance accountability and transparency in the utilization of public funds. On the downside, this power may lead to varied financial capacities among Panchayats, potentially exacerbating regional inequalities if not managed equitably. Additionally, if not monitored, it could lead to misuse of power or financial mismanagement .
In a multi-party coalition system, policy-making requires consensus among diverse parties, each with different ideologies, leading to compromises and a more consensus-based governance. This can result in policies that reflect a broader spectrum of public opinion but may also cause delays and diluted proposals due to the need for agreement. In contrast, a single-party cabinet can enact policies more decisively and rapidly, as decisions stem from a unified ideology and control. However, it may lack the checks and balances commonly found in coalition governments .
The Anti-Defection Law in India, enacted to curb political defections, contributes to the stability of coalition governments by discouraging elected members from switching parties for personal gains. This legal framework acts as a deterrent against the breakdown of coalitions due to shifting allegiances, thus maintaining the government's integrity and continuity .
The model code of conduct ensures free and fair elections by prescribing guidelines for political parties and candidates, aiming to prevent activities like the misuse of official machinery. It helps maintain a level playing field and promotes ethical behavior during elections. However, its main limitation is the lack of statutory backing, as it only functions with a persuasive effect and does not have enforceable legal power, which can lead to violations without stringent consequences .
A coalition government may be considered less transparent and accountable because decisions are often the result of behind-the-scenes negotiations among multiple parties, rather than explicit policy commitments made before the electorate. This opacity can undermine accountability, as voters may find it difficult to attribute responsibility for the government's actions to a particular party. Moreover, the need to maintain coalition harmony can lead to compromises that dilute policy clarity, making it harder for the electorate to hold parties accountable .
The Supreme Court's judgment in T.N. Seshan vs. Union of India implies that within the Election Commission of India, the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and other Election Commissioners possess equal status, power, and authority. This decision highlights the court's stance on maintaining equality and the collective functioning of the multi-member body, ensuring that no single individual dominates the institutional framework .
Coalition governments are often seen as more representative of a democratic process because they require the collaboration and consensus of multiple parties, which often represent a wider range of public opinions and interests. This collaboration can lead to policies that better reflect the diversity of the electorate's views, compared to a single-party system where decisions are usually guided by one party's ideology, potentially excluding minority viewpoints .
The central issue in the case of T.N. Seshan vs. Union of India was the challenge against the validity of the act equating the status, power, and authority of the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) and two other Election Commissioners. T.N. Seshan argued that the act was arbitrary, unconstitutional, and intended to curtail his powers as CEC. The Supreme Court resolved it by upholding the validity of the act, stating that the CEC does not have a superior status to other Election Commissioners, as outlined in the scheme of Article 324 of the Constitution, which provides for a multi-member Election Commission .
The Election Commission faces challenges in enforcing the model code of conduct due to its non-binding nature, which leads to difficulty in enforcing compliance among political parties and candidates. Furthermore, lack of legal sanctions for violations limits the Commission's power to act against offenders effectively. Addressing these challenges could involve legislative reforms to give the code a statutory basis, empowering the Commission with legal authority to penalize breaches and ensuring stricter adherence to ethical norms during elections .