ISI Mock Exam 2025: UGA & UGB Problems
Uploaded by
shrabanighosh366ISI Mock Exam 2025: UGA & UGB Problems
Uploaded by
shrabanighosh366Common questions
Powered by AIFor the problem involving the limit \( \lim_{n\to\infty} \sum \sum \left(\frac{i+j}{i^2+j^2}\right) \), this involves recognizing that as \(n\) becomes large, each term in the double summation tends towards zero. By transforming the double limit and applying integration approximation methods (like trapezoidal rule interpretations for Riemann sums), you can focus on expressions asymptotic to \(n\) and predict behaviour in boundary conditions. Consequently, integrating these insights yield the related limit expression of \(\frac{\pi}{2} - \ln 2\).
The scoring system for Part A (UGA) of the ISI Mock 2 exam is unique because it awards 4 marks for each correct answer, 1 mark for each unanswered question, and 0 marks for incorrect answers. This system encourages candidates to leave questions unanswered if unsure, rather than guessing, which is different from traditional scoring systems where unanswered questions typically receive zero marks .
For the function \( (5x^3 + 3y^5) - (5y^3 + 3x^5) \), you can use calculus to find the critical points by setting the partial derivatives with respect to \(x\) and \(y\) equal to zero. Then, analyze the nature of these stationary points using the second derivative test to identify whether they are maxima, minima, or saddle points. Additionally, symmetry and any constraints in the domain can assist in narrowing where maxima might occur, ultimately finding that the maximum value is 2 .
Eccentricity \(e\) of an ellipse is determined under the condition where tangents to this ellipse and a related parabola are perpendicular at specific points. The condition that the center of the ellipse and the vertex of a parabola coincide, and a shared axis gives constraints involving conics properties, tangent slopes, and responsive coordinate geometry. By examining the typical equations for tangents and comparing these with ellipse equation forms for the descriptions given (especially involutions and perpendicularity conditions), you trace back to an algebraic expression for \(e\), resulting in finding that \(e = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\).
The problem involves finding the area enclosed by the curve \( |z|^2 + |z^2 + 2| = 16 \). Here, recognize that each term in the equation can be interpreted in terms of distance and positions on the complex plane. For example, \( |z|^2 \) is the square of the magnitude of a complex number, representing a circle centered at the origin in the plane. By converting the expression to an equation that represents a circle's equation and applying the formula for the area of a circle, you determine that the enclosed area is \(7\pi\).
To determine the probability that circles \(A\) and \(B\) intersect, you analyze the geometric constraints given that their centers are independent but uniformly chosen from segments parallel to the x-axis. Considering the possible range of center positions and using geometric arguments, like considering overlap based on their relative positions and radii, simplifies calculating the probability. The rectilinear distance between the lines along which each circle's center can vary informs the analysis, leading to a calculated probability of \((2 + \sqrt{2})/4\) that they intersect .
The problem provides vectors \( \overrightarrow{OA} = \overrightarrow{a}, \overrightarrow{OB} = \overrightarrow{a} \times \overrightarrow{b}, \overrightarrow{OC} = (\overrightarrow{a} \times \overrightarrow{b}) \times \overrightarrow{a} \). The centroid \( M \) of the triangle formed by these vectors is given, and the magnitude \(|\overrightarrow{OM}|\) = \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\) is used to determine the angle between \(\overrightarrow{a}\) and \(\overrightarrow{b}\). Using known properties of vector triple products and geometry, the only angle that satisfies the magnitude of the centroid's vector is 60 degrees between \(\overrightarrow{a}\) and \(\overrightarrow{b}\).
Transforming the vertices of a tetrahedron as specified reduces its volume due to the averaging of coordinates: \( \overrightarrow{a} + \overrightarrow{b} + \overrightarrow{c} \over 3 \), etc. This averaging compresses the figure into a smaller volume. The determinant of the transformation matrix reveals this volume scaling factor. The transformation matrix indicates a reduction by a factor of \frac{1}{3}\) per dimension, leading to an overall volume reduction factor of \(\frac{1}{27}\). Accounting for this repetition in transformation calculations gives a total reduction to \(\frac{1}{8}\).
The principle used is the Mean Value Theorem. The problem states \( \int_0^{na} f(x) \,dx = n \int_0^a f(x) \,dx \), which implies that the function \( f \) has a periodic behavior when integrated over these intervals. Applying the fundamental theorem of calculus and considering the periodicity and symmetry of \( f \), the roots of \( f'(x) \) should correspond to the points where changes in intervals occur. Thus, the least number of real roots of \( f'(x) \) would be 2022 .
To find the ratio of \( I_1 = \int_0^1 x^3 (1-x)^5 \,dx \) and \( I_2 = \int_0^1 x^3 (1-x)^5 (1+x)^5 \,dx \), recognize that both integrals share a common factor of \( x^3(1-x)^5 \). This permits simplification primarily by comparing how the extra term \((1+x)^5\) affects the computation versus the original expression. Applying binomial expansion to the \((1+x)^5\) term and integrating term by term would yield the detailed evaluation needed to compute the precise ratio accurately, without needing the full evaluated values of each integral .