Project Report

By Sahil V Singh

CONTENTS

Sr. Topic Page

No. No.
1. Case Study 2
2. Procedure for Preparation & Approval of 6
Accounts
3. Audit Report Procedure under Section 143 10
4. Audit Committee Section 177 15
5. Board of Directors Section 149 18
6. Difference between AS and Ind AS 22
7. Section 186 – Loans, Guarantees, 23
Securities, and Investments
8. Audit Materiality and Sampling SA 320 & 27
SA 530
9. Conclusion 32
10. References 32

1|Page
 1. Case Study
1.1 Satyam Computer Services Fraud Case Study
The Satyam scam, exposed in January 2009, was one of India’s biggest corporate accounting
frauds.
Chairman Ramalinga Raju admitted to inflating profits, assets, and cash balances for several
years.
The company’s financial statements were artificially boosted to attract investors and maintain
stock prices.
Fake invoices, fictitious assets, and manipulated bank statements were used to hide the real
financial position.
The fraud went undetected due to weak controls and over-reliance on management-generated
data.
The scandal led to a complete overhaul of India’s corporate governance and auditing
regulations.

Accounting Aspects of the Satyam Fraud

 Fictitious Cash & Bank Balances:
Over ₹5,000 crore of cash was shown in books, supported by fake bank statements
and forged confirmations.
 Inflated Revenues:
Fake invoices, fake customer entries, and non-existent projects were recorded to show
higher sales.
 Overstated Profits:
Expenses were suppressed and revenues inflated, making profits seem much higher
than reality.
 Fake Debtors (Receivables):
Around ₹2,600 crore of receivables were fabricated to show strong business
operations.
 Manipulated Assets:
Assets like accrued interest, fixed deposits, and investments were shown even though
they did not exist.
 Concealed Liabilities:
Real liabilities were hidden to avoid showing the company’s financial stress.
 Round-Tripping & Window Dressing:
Funds were moved around group companies to make the balance sheet appear
healthy.

2|Page
What the Auditors Did Wrong (Auditor Failures)
 Did Not Verify Bank Balances Independently:
PwC relied on management-provided documents instead of obtaining direct
confirmations from banks.
 Ignored Red Flags:
Huge cash balances with no corresponding interest income should have been
questioned.
 Over-reliance on Management Representations:
Instead of applying professional scepticism, auditors trusted statements given by the
company.
 Failure to Test Internal Controls:
No proper testing of IT systems, revenue recognition controls, or invoice authenticity.
 Insufficient Audit Sampling & Evidence:
Did not test large transactions, debtor balances, or fake invoices thoroughly.
 Conflict of Interest & Lack of Independence:
PwC was accused of being too close to Satyam’s management, compromising
independence.
 Poor Documentation:
Many audit working papers were incomplete or lacked proper justification for
conclusions.

Items Rs. in crore Actual Reported Difference

Cash and Bank 321 5361 5040
Balances
Accrued Interest NIL 376.5 376
on Bank Fixed
Deposits
Understated 1230 None 1230
Liability
Overstated Debtors 2161 2651 490
Total NIL NIL 7136
Revenues (Q2 FY 2112 2700 588
2009)
Operating Profits 61 649 588

3|Page
1.2 Enron Scandal
The Enron scandal, revealed in 2001, is one of the biggest corporate frauds in global history.
Enron, once a top U.S. energy company, used complex financial structures to hide debt and
inflate profits.
Executives manipulated earnings through Special Purpose Entities (SPEs) to deceive
investors and regulators.
The company filed for bankruptcy after its true financial condition surfaced, shattering public
trust.
Thousands of employees lost jobs and pensions, and investors lost billions of dollars.
The scandal led to major reforms in corporate law, including the Sarbanes–Oxley Act (SOX)
of 2002.

Accounting Aspects of the Enron Fraud

 Use of Special Purpose Entities (SPEs):
Enron created hundreds of off-balance-sheet SPEs (like LJM1, LJM2, Chewco) to
hide massive debt and bad assets.
 Off-Balance Sheet Accounting:
Loss-making assets and liabilities were parked outside the financial statements,
making Enron look financially healthy.
 Mark-to-Market Accounting Abuse:
Enron recorded future projected profits as present income, creating artificial
revenue.
This resulted in huge discrepancies between reported earnings and actual
performance.
 Inflated Revenues:
Fake trading transactions and round-tripping inflated Enron’s revenue figures to
appear fast-growing.
 Manipulated Financial Ratios:
Profitability, leverage, and liquidity ratios were distorted to mislead analysts and
shareholders.
 Misclassified Assets and Liabilities:
Assets were overvalued and liabilities were deliberately underestimated to maintain
the illusion of financial stability.
 Complex Derivatives & Energy Contracts:
Hard-to-value derivatives were used to misstate fair value, confusing even regulators
and financial experts.

What the Auditors (Arthur Andersen) Did Wrong

 Failure to Maintain Independence:
Arthur Andersen earned huge consulting fees from Enron, creating a conflict of
interest with audit duties.

4|Page
  Ignored Red Flags:
Massive off-balance-sheet structures, unrealistic profits, and unusual related-party
deals were not questioned sufficiently.
 Destruction of Audit Evidence:
Andersen employees shredded documents and erased emails once investigations
began — an act that destroyed credibility.
 Insufficient Testing of SPEs:
Auditors did not examine whether SPEs met accounting requirements for off-balance-
sheet treatment.
 Over-reliance on Management:
Similar to Satyam, they trusted management explanations instead of verifying
independently.
 Lack of Skepticism:
Andersen failed to challenge the aggressive and unusual accounting techniques used
by Enron’s management.
 Failure to Verify Fair Value Measurements:
Mark-to-market valuations were not cross-checked with market realities, allowing
inflated numbers to pass.
 Poor Audit Documentation:
Work papers lacked depth, justification, and verification of key assumptions.

5|Page
 2. Procedure for Preparation & Approval of Accounts
(Covering Sec 128, 129, 133, 134, 136, 137)

Books of Accounts – Maintenance (Section 128)

Before accounts are prepared, companies must maintain proper books of account:

 At the registered office (can be kept elsewhere with ROC notice)

 On accrual basis
 Using double-entry system
 Maintain for 8 years

Preparation of Financial Statements (Section 129)

Once books are maintained, management prepares Financial Statements (FS) consisting of:

 Balance Sheet
 Profit & Loss / Income Statement
 Cash Flow Statement (except small companies, OPC, dormant)
 Statement of changes in equity (for Ind AS)
 Notes to accounts

Financial statements must:

✔ Comply with Schedule III format
✔ Comply with Accounting Standards (AS/Ind AS) under Section 133
✔ Present a true and fair view

Consolidated Financial Statements (CFS)

If the company has one or more subsidiary / associate / JV:

→ It must prepare CFS also (Sec 129(3)).

CFS must also follow:

 Schedule III
 AS/Ind AS
 True and fair view

6|Page
Draft Financial Statements Given to Auditor

Once prepared, draft FS are sent to the statutory auditor for audit.

Auditor performs:

 Audit procedures
 Verification
 Obtaining evidence
 Checking compliance with law and AS/Ind AS

Then auditor prepares:

✔ Independent Auditor’s Report (Sec 143)
✔ CARO Report (if applicable)

Board Approval of Financial Statements (Section 134)

After audit, financial statements + audit report are placed before a Board Meeting.

At this stage, the Board must:

 Review the FS
 Review the Auditor’s Report
 Approve the accounts
 Approve the Board’s Report

Signing of Financial Statements (Section 134(1))

Financial Statements must be signed by:

 Chairperson (if authorised)

OR
 2 Directors, including the MD if available
AND
 CEO, if appointed
AND
 CFO, if appointed
AND
 Company Secretary, if appointed

Auditor signs the Audit Report separately.

7|Page
Board's Report (Section 134(3))

Prepared by the Board and must include:

 Directors’ responsibility statement

 Details of loans/guarantees/investments (Sec 186)
 Related party transactions (Sec 188)
 CSR (Sec 135)
 Auditor qualifications and explanations
 Financial highlights
 Internal financial controls adequacy

Board’s Report must be signed by the Chairperson or two directors.

Circulation of Financial Statements to Members (Section 134(1))

After Board approval, the following must be sent to all shareholders:

✔ Financial Statements
✔ Board’s Report
✔ Auditor’s Report

This must be done at least 21 clear days before the AGM.

Adoption of Financial Statements at the AGM (Section 129 & 136)

In the Annual General Meeting:

Members:

 Review the FS
 Ask questions
 Seek explanations

Then shareholders pass an ordinary resolution to adopt the accounts.

8|Page
Filing of Financial Statements with ROC (Section 137)

After adoption:

Company must file:

 Financial Statements
 Board’s Report
 Auditor’s Report
 CFS (if any)

Filing Forms:

✔ AOC-4 for standalone FS

✔ AOC-4 CFS for consolidated FS
✔ Filing time: 30 days from the AGM

If AGM not held → still file within 30 days mentioning “AGM not held”

9|Page
 3. Audit Report Procedure under Section 143
Section 143 of the Companies Act, 2013 defines in detail the powers, rights, duties, and
reporting responsibilities of statutory auditors appointed under Section 139. It is one of the
most important provisions in corporate law, as it outlines what an auditor must examine, how
they must report, and the level of responsibility they carry while ensuring the financial
statements present a true and fair view.

This section strengthens the auditor’s accountability and ensures that financial reporting is
transparent, accurate, and compliant with legal and regulatory requirements.

Right of Access to Books, Accounts, and Information

Under Section 143(1), the auditor has the unrestricted right to:

 Access the company’s books of account at all times

 Examine vouchers, documents, and records
 Access the accounts of branch offices
 Seek explanations from officers and employees

This ensures that auditors can independently verify all financial information.

Auditor’s Duty to Enquire into Specific Matters

Section 143(1) requires the auditor to make specific inquiries, such as whether:

 Loans and advances have been properly secured

 Transactions are prejudicial to company interest
 Book entries represent genuine transactions
 Assets (like shares and securities) are sold at fair value
 Personal expenses are not charged to revenue
 Cash and bank balances actually exist
 The company maintains proper records for fixed assets

These inquiries prevent manipulation and ensure financial integrity.

Reporting Requirements
Section 143(2)

The auditor must provide an Independent Auditor’s Report to the members, stating:

10 | P a g e
  Whether the financial statements give a true and fair view
 Whether accounting policies and standards were appropriately applied
 Whether the financial statements comply with the Companies Act

This report is attached to the financial statements and is essential for shareholders.

Additional Reporting Requirements

Section 143(3)

The auditor must include several specific statements in the audit report, such as:

(a) Proper Books of Account

Whether the company has maintained proper books as required.

(b) Agreement with Books

Whether the financial statements are in agreement with the books.

(c) Compliance with Accounting Standards

Whether the company followed AS/Ind AS as required under Section 133.

(d) Director Disqualification

Whether any director is disqualified under Section 164.

(e) Adequacy of Internal Financial Controls (IFC)

Under Section 143(3)(i), the auditor must comment on:

 Adequacy of internal controls

 Operating effectiveness of such controls

This is one of the most critical responsibilities of the auditor.

(f) Observations & Adverse Remarks

Report any comments, qualifications, reservations, or adverse remarks.

(g) Other legal or regulatory requirements

Include matters mandated by CARO issued under Section 143(11).

11 | P a g e
Reporting on Fraud
Section 143(12)

If an auditor has reason to believe that a fraud has occurred, is occurring, or is likely to
occur, involving officers or employees, they must:

Step 1: Report to Audit Committee/Board

Include description and evidence.

Step 2: Board replies within 45 days

Step 3: Auditor forwards report + Board reply to the Central Government

Within 15 days of receiving the reply.

If no reply is received:

Auditor must still forward the fraud report to the Central Government with an explanation.

This ensures complete transparency in fraud-related matters.

CARO Reporting
Section 143(11)

The Central Government may require auditors to report on additional matters through the
Companies (Auditor’s Report) Order (CARO).

CARO includes detailed questions relating to:

 Fixed assets
 Inventory records
 Loans to related parties
 Statutory dues
 Internal controls

CARO forms an annexure to the main audit report.

12 | P a g e
Auditor’s Powers for Branch Audit
Section 143(8)

The auditor has the right to:

 Visit and inspect branch accounts

 Rely on reports of branch auditors (if appointed)
 Ensure that consolidation of branch accounts is accurate

Auditor’s Duty to Sign the Report

Section 143(9)

The auditor must:

 Sign the audit report

 Mention membership number
 Mention firm registration number (FRN)
 Provide date and place of signing

This ensures accountability and authenticity.

Compliance with Auditing Standards

Section 143(10)

Auditors must comply with Standards on Auditing (SAs) issued by:

 ICAI
 As approved by the Central Government

Failure to comply may amount to professional misconduct.

Protection for Auditors

Section 143(13)

If an auditor reports a fraud in good faith, they are protected from civil or criminal
liability.

This encourages auditors to report irregularities without fear.

13 | P a g e
Penalties for Non-Compliance
Auditors may face:

 Fines
 Imprisonment
 Action under professional misconduct rules
 Liability for damages caused due to improper reporting

This ensures professionalism and diligence.

14 | P a g e
 4. Audit Committee Section 177
Section 177 deals with the Audit Committee, which is a key corporate governance committee
responsible for overseeing financial reporting, internal controls, and auditor functioning.

Applicability (Who must form an Audit Committee)

(Section 177(1) + Rule 6)

Audit Committee is mandatory for:

1. Every listed public company

2. Public companies that meet ANY of the following:
o Paid-up share capital ≥ ₹10 crore
o Turnover ≥ ₹100 crore
o Loans/borrowings/deposits/debentures > ₹50 crore

Figures are based on the latest audited financial statements.

Composition of Audit Committee

(Section 177(2))

 Minimum 3 directors
 Majority must be Independent Directors
 Chairperson = Independent Director
 All members must be financially literate
 At least one member must have accounting/financial expertise

Key Functions of the Audit Committee

(Section 177(4))

The committee must handle:

A. Auditor-related functions

 Recommend appointment & remuneration of auditors

 Review auditor independence and performance
 Oversee the effectiveness of the audit process

15 | P a g e
B. Financial reporting functions

 Scrutinise the financial statements

 Review the auditor’s report
 Look into internal financial controls
 Evaluate risk management systems

C. Transaction monitoring

 Approve / modify related party transactions

 Scrutinise inter-corporate loans & investments
 Review valuation of assets / undertakings
 Monitor use of funds raised (like IPO money)

Omnibus Approval for Related Party Transactions (RPTs)

(Rule 6A)

Audit Committee can give omnibus approval for repeated RPTs, subject to:

 Maximum value limit

 Validity period (usually 1 year)
 Review of transactions every quarter

Powers of the Audit Committee

(Section 177(5) & 177(6))

The committee has the authority to:

 Call for comments of auditors

 Ask for any information from the company
 Investigate any matter related to its functions
 Seek professional advice from outside experts
 Have full access to company records

Attendance of Auditors & KMP

 The statutory auditor and key managerial personnel may attend meetings
 They have the right to be heard, but not to vote

16 | P a g e
Relationship with the Board
(Section 177(8))

 The Board must consider all recommendations of the Audit Committee

 If the Board disagrees, it must explain reasons in the Board’s Report

Vigil Mechanism (Whistle-blower system)

(Section 177(9)–(10) + Rule 7)

The Audit Committee must oversee the company’s Vigil Mechanism, which should:

 Allow employees/directors to report concerns

 Protect whistle-blowers from victimization
 Provide direct access to Audit Committee Chairperson
 Be disclosed in the Board’s Report and on the website

This applies to:

 Listed companies
 Companies borrowing ≥ ₹50 crore
 Companies accepting public deposits

17 | P a g e
 5. Board of Directors Section 149
Section 149 defines how the Board of Directors (BOD) of a company must be structured. It
ensures that the Board is qualified, independent, diverse, and accountable.

Minimum & Maximum Number of Directors

(Section 149(1))

 Public Company: Minimum 3 directors

 Private Company: Minimum 2 directors
 One Person Company (OPC): Minimum 1 director

Maximum number of directors = 15

More than 15 allowed only through a Special Resolution.

Resident Director Requirement

(Section 149(3))

Every company must have at least one director who stays in India for minimum 182 days
in the previous calendar year.

This ensures local presence and accountability.

Woman Director Requirement

(Second Proviso to Section 149(1))

Mandatory for:

 Every listed company

 Public companies with:
o Paid-up share capital ₹100 crore or more, OR
o Turnover ₹300 crore or more

This provision promotes gender diversity on the board.

18 | P a g e
Independent Directors (IDs)
(Section 149(4) – 149(12))

Listed public companies must appoint at least one-third Independent Directors.

Certain large public companies must appoint at least two Independent Directors (as per
Rule 4).

Key features of Independent Directors:

 High integrity & experience

 No material or financial relationship with the company
 Not related to promoters or management
 Cannot receive remuneration except sitting fees
 Term: Up to 5 years, renewable for one more term
 Maximum 2 consecutive terms allowed
 Must follow Code of Conduct under Schedule IV

They strengthen governance and maintain transparency.

Small Shareholders’ Director

(Section 151)

Listed companies may appoint one director elected by small shareholders (shareholders
holding shares of nominal value ≤ ₹20,000).

This provides minority shareholder representation.

Roles & Responsibilities of the Board

(Section 166)

The Board is responsible for:

 Ensuring true and fair financial reporting

 Approving financial statements
 Appointing and supervising auditors
 Overseeing internal controls
 Ensuring compliance with laws
 Strategic decision-making (policies, budgets, investments)
 Protecting shareholder interests

19 | P a g e
The Board is the main governing body of the company.

Disqualifications of Directors
(Section 164)

A person cannot be a director if they:

 Are of unsound mind

 Are insolvent
 Have been convicted (imprisonment ≥ 6 months)
 Failed to file financial statements/returns for 3 consecutive years
 Defaulted in repayment of deposits, debentures, or loans

This ensures only credible individuals run the company.

Retirement by Rotation
(Section 152 – applicable to public companies)

 Two-thirds of directors must be liable to retire by rotation

 One-third retire every AGM
 Retiring directors may be reappointed

This avoids concentration of power.

Types of Directors Recognized on the Board

 Executive Directors
 Non-Executive Directors
 Independent Directors
 Nominee Directors (appointed by banks/institutions)
 Woman Directors
 Small Shareholders’ Director

Each type has a different role and level of responsibility.

20 | P a g e
Liability of Directors
(Section 149(12))

Independent and Non-Executive Directors are liable only for acts:

 Done with their knowledge,

 With their consent/connivance, or
 Where they did not act diligently

This protects them from unfair prosecution.

21 | P a g e
 6. Difference between AS and Ind AS
Basis AS (Accounting Ind AS (Indian Accounting
Standards) Standards)
Origin / Framework Based on old Indian GAAP Converged with IFRS (International
Financial Reporting Standards)
Applicability Applicable to non-corporates Applicable to companies meeting net worth
and smaller companies criteria, listed companies, and groups
Fair Value More use of historical cost Extensive fair value accounting
Balance Sheet Format Assets are disclosed after Equity Assets are disclosed before Equity and
and Liabilities Liabilities
Consolidation Based on voting power (>50%) Based on control concept (power + returns)
under Ind AS 110
Presentation of Format prescribed under Detailed guidance under Ind AS 1 +
Financial Statements Schedule III Schedule III
Revenue Recognition AS 9 – simple recognition Ind AS 115 – 5-step revenue model
Impairment AS 28 – one-step impairment Ind AS 36 – two-step, more rigorous
Goodwill Goodwill is shown under Disclosure of Goodwill separately from
Intangible Assets Other Intangibles
Component Not mandatory Mandatory under Ind AS & Schedule II
Accounting
EPS AS 20 – Combined EPS Ind AS 33 Disclosure of EPS for continuing
disclosure operation and discontinuing operation
separately.
Related Parties Basic disclosures Detailed disclosures (Ind AS 24)
Consolidated FS Only if subsidiary exists Mandatory for all companies with “control”
Changes in Allowed only under AS or by Allowed if required by Ind AS or improves
Accounting Policy law relevance/reliability

22 | P a g e
 7. Section 186 – Loans, Guarantees,
Securities, and Investments
Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013 regulates how companies give loans, issue
guarantees, provide securities, and make investments.
It ensures financial discipline, transparency, and protection of shareholders and
creditors.

Scope of Section 186

Section 186 applies to the following transactions:

 Giving Loans
 Providing Guarantees
 Offering Securities in connection with a loan
 Making Investments in other companies or entities

This applies even when the recipient is not a company (e.g., an LLP or individual).

Note: Loans to directors are not covered here; they fall under Section 185.

Statutory Limits for Loans & Investments

Companies can make loans, guarantees, securities, or investments up to the following limits:

Limit A:

60% of:

 Paid-up Share Capital

 Free Reserves
 Securities Premium

OR

Limit B:

100% of:

 Free Reserves
 Securities Premium

23 | P a g e
A company may use whichever limit is higher.

These are called the automatic approval limits.

When Limits Are Exceeded

If the proposed amount exceeds the limits:

 A Special Resolution (SR) must be passed in the General Meeting

 Explanations must be provided to shareholders regarding the purpose and necessity

This ensures transparency in major financial decisions.

Mandatory Board Approval

Every transaction under this section requires unanimous approval of the Board.
Cannot be approved by:

 Circulation resolution
 Delegation
 Committee decision

This ensures that all directors are aware and involved.

Rate of Interest on Loans

Any loan given must carry an interest rate not less than the prevailing Government
Security (G-Sec) yield for a similar tenure.

This prevents companies from giving:

 Interest-free loans
 Extremely low-interest loans
 Indirect benefits to related parties

Restrictions When Company Is in Default

A company cannot give loans, guarantees, or investments if it has defaulted in:

 Repayment of deposits

24 | P a g e
  Payment of interest on deposits
 Loan or interest repayment to banks or institutions

This restriction applies until the default is fully corrected.

Register of Loans, Guarantees, Securities & Investments

(MBP-2)
Companies must maintain a register containing:

 Name of the recipient

 Amount and nature of transaction
 Purpose and terms
 Board approval details

The register must:

 Be maintained at the registered office

 Be updated within 7 days of each transaction
 Be open for inspection by members

Disclosures in Financial Statements

Companies must disclose:

 Full details of loans, guarantees, securities, and investments

 Purpose of such transactions
 Compliance with limits
 Approvals taken (Board/SR)
 Loans or guarantees to subsidiaries/associates

This promotes transparency.

Exemptions from Section 186

Section 186 does not apply to:

 Banking companies/NBFCs
 Insurance companies
 Housing finance companies
 Infrastructure Facility

25 | P a g e
  Loans/Guarantees/Securities given to a Wholly-Owned Subsidiary (WOS) or Joint
Venture (only Board approval needed)

Penalties for Non-Compliance

For the Company:

 Fine: ₹25,000 to ₹5,00,000

For Officers in Default:

 Fine: ₹25,000 to ₹1,00,000

 Imprisonment up to 2 years (in severe cases)

This ensures responsible financial management.

Summary of Section 186

✔ Governs loans, guarantees, securities, and investments
✔ Requires unanimous Board approval
✔ Requires Special Resolution if limits exceed
✔ Mandates MBP-2 register
✔ Includes strict disclosure requirements
✔ Contains exemptions for financial-sector companies
✔ Includes penalties for misuse or non-compliance

Section 186 promotes financial discipline, transparency, and corporate accountability.

26 | P a g e
 8. Audit Materiality and Sampling SA 320
& SA 530
Auditors use Materiality and Sampling to plan and perform audits efficiently.
Materiality helps decide what matters, while sampling helps decide how much to check.

Audit Materiality – As per SA 320

Materiality means the level of misstatement that would influence the economic decisions
of users of financial statements.

It helps the auditor decide:

 What is important
 What errors could change the view of users
 Where to focus audit efforts

Objective of Materiality
SA 320 requires the auditor to:

 Identify material misstatements

 Plan audit procedures based on risk and significance
 Ensure financial statements present a true and fair view
 Concentrate audit efforts on significant areas

Materiality ensures the audit is effective and efficient.

Types of Materiality
Overall Materiality (OM)

The maximum error allowed in the financial statements as a whole.

Often based on benchmarks such as:

 5% of profit
 1% of revenue
 1–2% of total assets

Performance Materiality (PM)

27 | P a g e
Lower than overall materiality.
Used to reduce the risk that total uncorrected errors exceed OM.

Materiality for Specific Items

Used for areas that are sensitive or important, such as:

 Related party transactions

 Directors’ remuneration
 Fraud-prone items

Factors Considered While Setting Materiality

 Size of the company
 Nature of business
 Needs of users
 Level of risk
 Past misstatements
 Regulatory requirements

Materiality is professional judgment, not a fixed formula.

Revision of Materiality
If circumstances change during the audit (e.g., profits drop sharply), the auditor revises
materiality and adjusts the audit plan accordingly.

Relationship Between Materiality and Audit Risk

✔ Higher materiality → Less work
✔ Lower materiality → More work
✔ Higher risk → Lower materiality

The auditor balances risk and materiality to design audit procedures.

Summary of SA 320
Materiality helps the auditor decide:
✔ What misstatements are important

28 | P a g e
✔ How much evidence is needed
✔ Where to focus most work
✔ When to revise the audit plan

Audit Sampling As per SA 530

Audit sampling means checking less than 100% of transactions and still forming a
conclusion about the whole population.

Sampling is used because:

 Checking everything is impractical

 Cost and time constraints
 Large volume of transactions

Objectives of Sampling
SA 530 requires sampling to provide:

 Reasonable assurance
 A representative selection of items
 A basis to draw conclusions about the entire population

Sampling ensures efficiency without reducing audit quality.

Types of Audit Sampling

Statistical Sampling

Uses math, probability, and formulas.

Examples:

 Random sampling
 Systematic sampling
 Stratified sampling

Provides measurable confidence levels.

Non-Statistical Sampling

29 | P a g e
Based on the auditor’s judgment.
Examples:

 Haphazard sampling
 Judgmental selection
 Targeted sampling (high-value items)

Used when auditor wants flexibility.

Sample Selection Methods

Random Sampling

Every item has equal chance of selection.

Used for unbiased results.

Systematic Sampling

Selection based on every “nth” item.

Example: every 20th invoice.

Stratified Sampling

Population divided into groups (strata) such as:

 High-value transactions
 Medium-value
 Low-value
Used to increase audit efficiency.

Judgmental Selection

Auditor selects:

 High-value items
 Risky items
 Unusual entries

Useful when certain transactions carry higher risk.

Sample Size Considerations

Sample size depends on:

30 | P a g e
  Level of risk
 Materiality
 Nature of controls
 Complexity of items
 Size of population

Higher risk → larger sample size.

Sampling Risk
Two types of sampling risk:

Risk of Incorrect Acceptance

Auditor concludes no error, but the accounts are actually misstated.

Very dangerous.

Risk of Incorrect Rejection

Auditor believes there is an error, but there isn’t.

Leads to unnecessary work.

SA 530 aims to minimize these risks.

Projection of Errors
Any error found in the sample is projected to the entire population.
If projected errors exceed materiality, auditor must:

 Increase sample size

 Perform additional procedures
 Modify the audit opinion (in extreme cases)

Summary of SA 530
Audit sampling helps the auditor:
✔ Check fewer items with reliable results
✔ Reduce cost and time
✔ Keep risk low
✔ Draw conclusions about the entire population

31 | P a g e
Combined Summary SA 320 & SA 530
✔ SA 320 (Materiality) tells the auditor how big an error matters.
✔ SA 530 (Sampling) tells the auditor how much to check.
✔ Both standards ensure the audit is efficient, effective, and risk-focused.

9. Conclusion
Through the case studies of Satyam and Enron, the report highlights how governance failures,
manipulation of accounts, and auditor negligence can lead to catastrophic consequences. These
events strengthened global and Indian regulatory frameworks, resulting in:

 Stricter auditing standards

 Enhanced disclosure requirements
 Stronger internal financial controls
 Increased accountability of directors and auditors

The sections on AS vs Ind AS, Section 186, audit report procedures, and materiality &
sampling provide a detailed understanding of the statutory and practical aspects that govern
corporate reporting. Furthermore, the description of board and audit committee composition
reinforces the critical role of oversight mechanisms.

Overall, this project emphasizes that ethical conduct, compliance with standards, and sound
corporate governance are essential pillars for sustaining investor trust and long-term business
success.

10. References
 ICAI Standards on Auditing
 Companies Act, 2013
 SEBI Regulations
 Class notes and materials

32 | P a g e