A STUDY ON STRESS MANAGEMET OF EMPLOYEES OF

KERALA FEEDS LIMITED,KARUNAGAPPALLY

PROJECT REPORT

Submitted In partial fulfillment of the Requirement For the Award of the Degree
BACHELORS OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

UNIVERSITY OF KERALA
By
NIRMAL GK
ADHIL N
KIRAL SAJU
VINAYAK
Under supervision and guidence of

SHREE VIDYADHIRAJA COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCE

Karunagapally,Thevarkavu
 INDUSTRY PROFILE

Production of cattle feed is an important activity in rural and semi-urban areas. Apart
from farming activity, a large part of rural livelihood depends on cattle. It is the only
source of milk. Organic manure and fuel requirement is met from the excreta of the
cattle. Entire diary industry and meat is depending fully on the cattle rearing. Therefore,
the requirement of cattle feed for both as domestic animals as well as commercial cattle
in huge.

The demand for the milk and milk products has been increased. This makes it absolutely
necessary for rearing cattle which produce high yield. From this arouse the concept of
producing cattle feed, wherein there is no compromise over the nutritional composition.
Feed manufacturing, a commercial and scientific basis started around 1965 with the
setting up of medium sized feed plants in the Northern and Western India.

Nutrients abstracts and reviews, July 1994; in India, we have very large livestock
population comprising of 220 million cattle, 80 million buffaloes and 70 millions of
sheep. 120 million goats besides non ruminants and other species of livestock.

Kerala Feeds headed in palletized marketing introduced the cooking process. Improved
feed technology has resulted in better control and eradication of disease. The age old
feeding pattern practiced in India is a mixed variety consisting of green grass, dry grass,
cotton seed cake, coconut cake, rice bran etc..From the time immemorial, the cows were
fed by grazing in open areas. But, as time elapsed/due to changes both environmental and
social, there has been gradual shift from the age old pattern to Compouned Cattle Feed
(CCF).
GLOBAL SCENARIO

The global livestock industry refers to the raising of animals and the processing of animal
products. Animals raise for livestock industry purpose includes pigs, sheeps, cattle,
horses, and goats. Industrialization has led to significant changes within the livestock
industry allowing mass production of animal products to meet the growing needs of an
expanding global population. The global animal feed market is growing at a steady pace
and has a promising future because of the globally increasing demand for the meat and
meat products. Feed additives are becoming an important part of feed for animal growth
and nutrition. The feed industry has modern computerized plants and the latest
equipments for analytical producers and least cost ratio formulation and it employs the
latest manufacturing technology.
The organized sector of the compound feed industry is facing serious problems resulting
from a huge idle capacity to the extent of 50% or more. Global participants of the feed
business and by national as well as multinational integrators are adding new capacities.
Animal feeds play a leading role in the global food industry and feed is the largest and
most important component to ensuring safe, abundant and affordable animal proteins.
World compounded feed production is fast approaching an estimated 1 billion tones
annually. The Europe and the US are the largest markets for animal feed additives and
Asia is emerging as a high growth market. The UN Food and Agricultural Organization
(FAO) estimates that the world will have to produce 60% more feed by 2050. One of the
challenges is that on top of the almost 1 billion tones of feed is produced by the feed
industry and around 300 tones of feed are produced directly by its own farm mixing. IFIF
believes it is vital for the feed industry and for the sustainability of the whole feed and
food chain that clear standards apply throughout the whole feed chain. We believe both
industrial and on farm mixers should be controlled and inspected on a regular basis. that
clear
standards apply throughout the whole feed chain. We believe both industrial and on farm
mixers should be controlled and inspected on a regular basis.
NATIONAL SCENARIO

The Indian feed industry is about 35 years old. It is mainly restricted to diary and poultry
feed manufacturing. The quality standards of Indian feeds are high and up to international
levels. Raw materials for feed are adequately available in India. The industries population
is about 3 million tones which represent only 5% of the total potential and exporters are
not very high. The feed industry has modern computerized plants and the latest
manufacturing technology. In India most research work on animal feeds is practical and
focuses on the use of byproduct, the upgrade of ingredients and the enhancing of
productivity. The country has entered into a period of liberalization and this is bound to
influence the livestock industry. The per capital consumption of milk, egg and broiler
meat will grow. Today the Indian industry is undergoing a very exciting phase of growth
for the next decade.

STATE SCENARIO

There are about 33 companies manufacturing compounded cattle feed in the state, out of
this only 6 companies are in the organized sector rest of them are in the small scale
sector. They manufacture and sell their products under different brand names. The cattle
industry in Kerala is developing rapidly which create demand for the cattle feed. There
are many cattle farmers as well as laboratories, so cattle feed industry is growing. The
major players in Kerala are Kerala Feeds, Godrej Feeds Ltd, Milma Feeds, Prima Feeds,
SKM, Kerala Solvents and Extraction Ltd.
FUTURE SCOPE OF THE INDUSTRY

Recent liberalization of exterior trade in livestock products has made the feed industry
very competitive. In order to withstand in such a competitive environment it has become
very necessary for the domestic processing industries to improve its quality of work.

This decade is expressing significant changes in re-structuring mergers, acquisitions,

amalgamation, joint-ventures, diversifications, integration and efficient service chains,
commerce and largest information technology in global tender, trading, export/import and
other commercial activities. The root of all these development will be the scientific
development of feed manufacturing technology. The Indian feed industry will
increasingly use biotechnology and genetically modified organisms to support the feed
industry which is entering a very exciting phase of growth for the remaining portion of
this decade in order to complete this ever changing environment.
 2.2 COMPANY PROFILE

Kerala Feeds Limited is a pioneering venture of the State Government under the
Department of Dairy and Animal Husbandry. Kerala Feeds Limited, a Kerala
Government Company, was set up in 1995, incorporated under the Company’s Act. The
total project was approximately Rs. 3,240 lacks, out of which Rs. 2,109 lacks are
Government equity. Rs. 631 lacks is shareholding of various Co-operative or Public
sector undertakings and Rs. 500 lacks is term loans from Nationalized Banks. The
company is headed by Board of Directors. The plant was commissioned in late 1998 and
commercial production could start in January 1999, with one shift only. The second and
thirds shift operations commenced in June 1999 and July 2000 respectively.

The Head Office is located in Kallettumkara village in Mukundapuram Taluk of Thrissur

district. Being an ISO 9001-2008 Company, all the process and technology in Kerala
Feeds Limited is also an ISI certificate holder company in India. Kerala Feeds Limited
was also selected by the State Government for the most Result Oriented energy
conservation drives during 2002-03.

The organization has procured and developed material handling system in which its
requirement to lighten the burden of the employees. The plant and its Milling, Mixing,
Cooking and Pelletizing (MMCP) technology were imported from Nether land. These
machines have helped the company to produce quality pellets and capture the markets
which was in the hands of private sector companies. The raw-material is checked for its
quality, stored in go down, filled in bins, drawn in fixed proportion ground to fine
particular size, mixed homogeneity, cooked for better digestibility and palletized keeping
the need of the cattle in mind. Only dumping of raw-materials and sacking of finished
feed is manual while the other process are fully automated and controlled from the plant
Control Room. The plant has dedicated PLC software controlling all activities of the
plant from dumping up to bagging.
The unit produces 500 tones of cattle feed as per day. Apart from Kerala, the company
caters to Karnataka and Lakshadweep. While making product, Kerala Feeds Limited
follow BIS standard.

The units presently owned by the company are:

 650 TPD Cattle Feed Plant – Kallettumkara, Thrissur
 Mineral Mixture Plant – Athavanad, Malappuram
 Densified Fodder Block Unit – Muthalamada, Palakkad
 300 TPD Cattle Feed Plant – Karunagapally, Kollam
 300 TPD Cattle Feed Plant – Chemmenchery, Kozhikode

Ongoing projects of the company are :

 50 TOD Bye pass Protein Plant, Karunagappally, Kollam
 500 TPD Cattle Feed Plant, Idukki
 60 TPD Goat Feed Plant, Chemmenchery, Kozhikode

VISION
Kerala Feeds Limited is committed to provide quality livestock feed and services to
farmers at lowest cost.

MISSION
 Increase the production of Balanced Compound Cattle Feed (BCCF) in pellet form
from 950MT/ day to 1810MT/day.
 To manufacture appropriate type of feed and feed supplements for different stages
of livestock.
 To become a market driving company from market driven company.
 To achieve a turnover of Rs. 500 crore
 To evolve the cultures of innovation and creativity amongst the employees,
 To become a model for Government public sector undertakings.
Features of Kerala Feeds Limited
 Advanced technology.
 Computerized control system
 The only feed company which uses MMCP technology.
 The quality of product is ensured from collection of raw material up to the finished
feed.
 Moisture content is fully removed by heating at 80 degrees.
 High homogeny.
 Different kinds of mineral, protein, vitamins etc are contained in right quality.
2.3 PROUCT PROFILE
K. F Elite and K.F Rich are the main products of Kerala Feeds Limited. Other products of
Kerala Feeds Limited are Keranin, Densified Fodder Block and K.F Malabaree Goat
Feed.
 K.F. ELITE
It is a high energy feed for high yielding animals. It consists of 70% of total Detestable
Nutrients. This feed is rich in protein and calcium which helps to prevent Milk Fever. It
also helps to increase resisting power among cattle. K.F. ELITE consists of Digestable
protein, Kilated zinc, chromoium, manganese etc…
 K.F RICH
It is a protein rich balance feed for late lactation and pregnancy. It helps to increase the
fat content in the milk.
 KERAMIN
Keramin is produced by Kerala Feeds with the technical guidance of National Diary
Development Board. T is a mineral rich livestock supplement.
Mineral contents of KERAMIN :-
1. Calcium
2. Phosphorous
3. Manganese
4. Iron
5. Magnesium
6. Potassium
7. Sodium
8. Cobalt
9. Copper
10. Zinc
11. Iodine
Keramin helps to improve the health of cattle, improved the amount and quality of
milk. It also helps to grow the teeth, bones and muscles of the cattle
 Densified Fodder Block
It is a complete feed containing roughage and minerals.
 K.F. Malabaree Goat Feed
This feed consists of 18% of crude protein which improved the growth of goat. It does
not contain urea. This feed is rich in vitamins and minerals. It consists of de-oiled
groundnut extraction, de-oiled cotton seed extraction, de-oiled rape seed extraction,
soyabean meal etc…It is a high protein feed for better growth rate and reproduction.
MAIN COMPETITORS
1. Kerala Solvents and Extractions Ltd.
2. Godrej Feeds Ltd.
3. Prima Feeds
4. SKM
5. Milma Feeds
6. Koyenco Feeds Ltd
7. AVM
Kerala Feeds Cattle Feed : Process

Kerala Feeds Limited, is engaged in the production and sales of cattle feed. Presently, the
company is manufacturing three varieties of cattle feed to meet the requirement of
various type of cattle. Summary of the various process involved in the production of
Kerala Feeds cattle feed are given below :

Nearly twelve types of raw materials including different types of grains, de-oiled cakes,
minerals, salt, urea, molasses etc…are used in the production process. The agro based
raw materials are stored in the storage silos or raw material godown while molasses is
stored in the molasses tank. Depending on the formulation of the cattle feed to be
produced, the various raw materials are drawn from the silos automatically, or manually
dumped at the dump pits in the raw material godown. These raw materials are stored in
the proportionate bins, weighted to the proportion in the weighing hopper and transferred
to the buffer bin. This material then moves through the grinder sieve to the hammer mill
where it is powdered. Material from the hammer mill is then mixed with molasses and
transferred to the mash bins. Steam at optimum pressure is then applied to this material in
the pellet mill, where it is cocked and pelletised, The pellets are then cooled in the cooler
and collected in the pellet bins. The collected pellets are bagged and stitched.
MMCP Technology
In KFL, MMCP Technology is used for the manufacturing of cattle feeds. The word
MMCP is framed as an acronym for Milling, Mixing, Cooking and pellesting technology.
Using MMCP technology required quantities of raw materials, such as maize, bran,
wheat flakes etc are powdered to the required size using the milling process and these are
mixed according to the formula, formulated by Quality Control Department. The mixing
of raw materials resulted in a semi solid form of cattle feed. The mixture is cooked at
approximately 60 degree by a process called gelatinization. Finally the cooked
ingredients are allowed to extrude through a dye which gives shape of pellets.
 INGREDIENTS
Sl. No Ingredients % Remarks
Grains
1 Maize
2 Jowar
3 Rice 25% Minimum 2 grains
4 Ragi Powder
5 Wheat Powder
6 De-oiled rice bran 30%
7 Rice Polish 10%
De-Oiled Cakes
8 De-oiled ground nut extraction.
9 De-oiled cotton seed extraction
10 De-oiled rape seed extraction 20% Minimum 4 de-oiled
cakes.
11 De-oiled sunflower extraction
12 De-oiled coconut cake
13 Soya bean meal
14 Tamarind seed powder
15 Mango kernel extraction Seasonal
16 Turmeric Spent
17 Mineral Mixture
18 Calcium Powder 12%
19 Salt
20 Urea
21 Molasses 8%
2.4 DEPARTMENT PROFILE
The top management of the company is headed by Board of Directors constitute the
executive body of the company. Chairman and Ten Directors constitute Board of
Directors. The Managing Director controls day to day affairs of the company. The Board
of Directors has been appointed by Government of Kerala. The Managing Director gives
dynamic leadership to a team of professional managers. Each Department is headed by
either Manager or Deputy Manager.
As a new firm, Kerala Feeds, Karunagappally unit lacks some departments. Almost all
activities are controlled by Head Office. There are mainly six departments working
smoothly here. Functional department of Kerala Feeds Ltd, Karunagappally unit are asl
follows :

1. Human Resources Department

2. Production Department
3. Material Department
4. Quality Control Department
5. Finance Department
6. Marketing and Sales Department

5.1 HUMAN RESOURCE DEPARTMENT

Human resources department is one of the important departments in every organization.

It is mainly for the welfare of all employees. The Human Resources Management is the
process of acquiring, training, appraising and compensating employees and of attending
to their labour relation. In Kerala Feeds, the human resources department delivers its
responsibility by efficiently using and controlling the manpower of the company.
Structure of Human Resource Department

UNIT HEAD
(HRM)

JUNIOR OFFICER

OTHER STAFFS

Function of HR Department

 Recruitment
In Kerala Feeds Limited, all the recruitment process is done by the Company Board
directly.

 Selection Process
The steps that Kerala Feeds follow is selection process are :
 Inviting and receiving applications.
 Screening the applications.
 Selection Test
 Aptitude Test
 Personality Test
 Achievement Test
 Trade Test
 Training and Development
Kerala Feeds provides training to its employees both internally and externally. Industrial
training programs are designed for both existing and newly recruited employees.

 Manpower Planning
Manpower Planning is the process which determines how an organization should move
from its current manpower position to its desired manpower position

Manpower Strength

Category Total
Employees 70
Workers 115
Total 185

 Welfare Measures
The company has a very peaceful atmosphere. Trade union is a voluntary association of
workers formed to protect and promote their interest through collective action. The
company has 6 registered trade unions. They are :-
INTUC – Indian National Trade Union Congress
AITUC – All India Trade Union Congress
UTUC – United Trade Union Congress
BMS – Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh
HMS – Hind Mazdoor Sabha
CITU – Centre of Indian Trade Union
Other Functions of HR Department are :-
 Recruiting and examination of applicants.
 Development of job classification, including wages and benefits.
 Responsibility for labour relations, union negotiations and employee relations.
 Maintenance of personnel records.
 Development of implementation of personnel policies and programs.
 Implementation and administration of employee development and training programs.

5.2 PRODUCTION DEPARTMENT

Kerala Feeds Karunagappally unit is a 300 TPD Cattle feed plant (Commissioned)
Project cost Rs. 52.4 crores. Production is the fundamental function of the unit. The
production department of Kerala Feeds maintain one of the highest standards of
excellence found anywhere in the country. Since Kerala Feeds Limited is fully
mechanized cattle feed factory, the number of workers and the hardness of workload is
less when we compare with other cattle feed industries.

The functions of Production and maintenance Department include planning and execution
of production schedule, maintenance of equipments and machineries. Major products of
Kerala Feeds Limited are:-

K.F Elite
K. F Rich
Goat Feeds
KERAMIN
FLOW CHART OF PRODUCTION PROCESS

Pre-mix Plant Raw materials Silo Plant

Bins

Wait achievement process

Batching

Grinding Process

Hammering

Batch Mixing

Cooking

Pelletizing

Cooling Process

Storage Plant

Bagging and Packing

 Structure of Production Department

Manager
Production In-
charge

Engineers

Technical Non- Control Mechanical

Staff Technical Room Staff Staff
Staff

5.3 MATERIALS DEPARTMENT

The function of materials department are :

 Receipt of Raw-materials
 Issue of Raw-materials
 Receipt of spares
 Issue of spares
 Receipt of finished feed
 Dispatch of finished feed
 Inventory control
 Structure of Materials Department

Materials Department

Raw material Finished Fitting and Weigh

section Products Spares Bridge

Supervisor Supervisor Supervisor Supervisor

Workers Workers Workers Workers

5.4 FINANCE DEPARTMENT

All the financial activities are performed by the finance department Kalletumkara,
Thrissur. So the firm does not has any role in financial accounts maintenance. The firm
only enters the daily transaction is head office financial software. They provide receipts
for the cash received from agents and the amount and the receipt number enters in head
offices account.

Finance Department Functions

 Optimum utilization of funds without endangering the finance solvency of the

Company through decisions such as Capital Budgeting, Profit Planning, Tax
Management and Working Capital Management.
 To ensure control over expenses by constantly monitoring actual with that of
budgeted figures.
 To find out room for cost control and cost reduction by constantly monitoring
various operational activities.
Accounting Functions
 Receipts and payments of money are accurately recorded so that all payables and
receivables are correctly reflected.
 All assets and liabilities are recorded and classified properly in accordance with
statutory requirements to reflect the financial position of the company as at a
particular date.
 All income and expense of a particular period are accurately reflected in
accordance with relevant statues to gauge the working results of the period.
 To ensure truth and fairness of financial statements namely Balance Sheet and
Profit and Loss Account.

Structure of Finance Department

Manager (Finance and Accounts)

Junior Accounts Officer

OTHER STAFFS

5.5 QUALITY CONTROL MANAGEMENT

The main task of the quality control department is to completely analyze the raw-
materials and point out defect in it, Normally every week the nutrition has to after the
formula of cattle feed which in time governed the availability, rate and quality of raw-
material.
 Structure of Quality Control Department

Deputy Manager( Q C )

Chemist

Lab Assistant

OTHER STAFFS

Functions

 Incoming raw-material quality control.

 In process quality control.
 Finished feed quality control.
 Extension activities related to feeds and feeding.
 Analysis of external feed and raw-material samples.
 Research and development activities

Quality Parameters
1. Moisture
2. Crude protein
3. Acid insoluble ash.
4. Calcium
5. Crude Fiber
MARKETING AND SALES DEPARTMENT
Marketing is a social and managerial process by which the product and services reach to
the ultimate customer. The company has a good marketing network which includes 400
dealers and 450 co-operatives.

Structure of Marketing Department

Deputy Manager (Marketing)

Junior Officer

Sales Executives

Transporter

Other Staffs

Objective of Department
 Maximum Turnover
 Maximum Profit
 Maximum customer relation
 Maximum customer satisfaction

Marketing Strategies of Kerala Feeds

1. Necessary publicity will be provided for assistance. The company reduced its
advertising expenditure and concentrates more on different medias.
2. Cost of operation kept to minimum.
3. Sales representatives will be providing for assistance.
4. Supply quality products at reasonable prices using advanced production
technique.
5. Other marketing strategies.
 5.6 ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF KERALA FEEDS LTD.

Board of Directors

Chairman

Managing Director

Assistant General Manager

HR Material Finance Production Marketing Quality

DEPT DEPT DEPT DEPT DEPT DEPT

Assistant Assistant Finance Production Marketing Assistant

Manager Manager Manager Manager Manager Manager

Assistant Store Officer Officers Deputy Manager Officer Chemist

Office Store Keeper Assistants Assistant Junior Lab

Attendant Manager Officer Attender

Drivers
Shift Office
Engineers Assistant

Junior Field
Engineers Assistant

Technician Workers
TABLE 1

[Link] you agree that practicing mindfulness reduces your daily stress levels?

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant Percentage

1 Strongly disagree 12 24
2 Disagree 10 20
3 Neither agree or disagree 13 26
4 Agree 12 24
5 Strongly Agree 3 6
Total 50 100

CHART 1

30

25

20

15

10

0
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree Agree Strongly Agree
or disagree

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 74% of respondents (24% strongly disagree and 20% disagree)
expressed agreement with the opinion, 26% remaining neither agree or disagree, and 24% agree and
6%strongly agree.
TABLE 2

[Link] would you rate the effectiveness of your current stress management techniques?

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Very bad 3 6
2 Bad 10 20
Neither Bad or
3 Good 8 16
4 Good 20 40
5 Very Good 9 18
Total 50 100

CHART 2

25

20

15

10

0
Very bad Bad Neither Bad Agree Strongly Agree
or Good

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 60% of respondents (6%Very bad and 20% Bad) expressed
agreement with the opinion, 16% remaining neither bad or good, and 40% good and 18%very
good
 TABLE 3

[Link] you given enough flexibility to choose your own stress relief activities during work?

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Strongly disagree 9 18
2 Disagree 16 32
3 Neither agree or disagree 6 12
4 Agree 12 24
5 Strongly Agree 7 14
Total 50 100

CHART 3

30

25

20

15

10

0
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree Agree Strongly Agree
or disagree

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 50% of respondents (18% strongly disagree and 32% disagree)
expressed agreement with the opinion, 12% remaining neither agree or disagree, and 24% agree and
14%strongly agree.
 TABLE 4

[Link] you agree that your colleagues support you in managing work related stress?

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Strongly disagree 6 12
2 Disagree 10 20
3 Neither agree or disagree 5 10
4 Agree 21 42
5 Strongly Agree 8 16
Total 50 100

CHART 4

30

25

20

15

10

0
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree Agree Strongly Agree
or disagree

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 62% of respondents (12% strongly disagree and 20% disagree)
expressed agreement with the opinion, 10% remaining neither agree or disagree, and 42% agree and
16%strongly agree.
TABLE 5

5. In your experience, do you involve others in making decisions that help reduce your job stress?

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Strongly disagree 8 16
2 Disagree 10 20
3 Neither agree or disagree 10 20
4 Agree 17 34
5 Strongly Agree 5 10
Total 50 100
CHART 5

30

25

20

15

10

0
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree Agree Strongly Agree
or disagree

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 74% of respondents (16% strongly disagree and 20% disagree)
expressed agreement with the opinion, 20% remaining neither agree or disagree, and 34% agree and
10%strongly agree.
TABLE 6

[Link] you agree that regular physical activity helps you cope with work related stress?

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Strongly disagree 7 14
2 Disagree 12 24
3 Neither agree or disagree 15 30
4 Agree 11 22
5 Strongly Agree 5 10
Total 50 100
CHART 6

30

25

20

15

10

0
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree or Agree Strongly Agree
disagree

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 54% of respondents (14% strongly disagree and 24% disagree)
expressed agreement with the opinion, 30% remaining neither agree or disagree, and 22% agree and
10%strongly agree.
TABLE 7

7. How would you rate the overall effectiveness of the stress relief resources offered by your organization?

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Very bad 2 4
2 Bad 12 24
Neither Bad or
3 Good 17 34
4 Good 10 20
5 Very good 9 18
Total 50 100
CHART 7

18

16

14

12

10

0
Very bad Bad Neither Bad or Agree Strongly Agree
Good

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 58% of respondents (4%Very bad and 24% Bad)
expressedagreement with the opinion, 34% remaining neither bad or good, and 20% good and
18%verygood
 TABLE 8

8. Are you given sufficient freedom to choose when and how you take short breaks during the day?

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Strongly disagree 10 20
2 Disagree 6 12
3 Neither agree or disagree 9 18
4 Agree 20 40
5 Strongly Agree 5 10
Total 50 100

CHART 8

30

25

20

15

10

0
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree Agree Strongly Agree
or disagree

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 60% of respondents (20% strongly disagree and 12% disagree)
expressed agreement with the opinion, 18% remaining neither agree or disagree, and 40% agree and
10%strongly agree.
TABLE 9

[Link] you feel that your manager encourages open discussion about stress and well being?

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Strongly disagree 11 22
2 Disagree 8 16
3 Neither agree or disagree 12 24
4 Agree 14 28
5 Strongly Agree 5 10
Total 50 100

CHART 9

30

25

20

15

10

0
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree Agree Strongly Agree
or disagree

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 52% of respondents (22% strongly disagree and 16% disagree)
expressed agreement with the opinion, 24% remaining neither agree or disagree, and 28% agree and
10%strongly agree.
TABLE 10

[Link] your experience, do you involve teammates in planning how to handle

high pressure projects

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Strongly disagree 6 12
2 Disagree 11 22
3 Neither agree or disagree 6 12
4 Agree 14 28
5 Strongly Agree 13 26
Total 50 100

CHART 10

30

25

20

15

10

0
Strongly disagree Disagree Neither agree Agree Strongly Agree
or disagree

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 50% of respondents (12% strongly disagree and 22% disagree)
expressed agreement with the opinion, 12% remaining neither agree or disagree, and 28% agree and
26%strongly agree.
 TABLE 11

[Link] you take short breaks when you feel stressed?

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 YES 30 60
2 NO 20 40
Total 50 100
CHART 11

20
30

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 60% of respondents answered "yes," while 40% answered "
no"
 TABLE 12

12 Is regular physical activity part of your routine to relieve stress

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 YES 28 56
2 NO 22 44
Total 50 100
CHART 12

28
22

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 56% of respondents answered "yes," while 44% answered "
no"
 TABLE 13

13. Do you practice deep breating or meditation during the workday

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 YES 21 42
2 NO 29 58
Total 50 100

CHART 13

29 21

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 42% of respondents answered "yes," while 58% answered "
no"
 TABLE 14

14.1 am satisfied with the overall work environment in my organization.

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Very dissatisfied 6 12
2 Dissatisfied 3 6
3 Neutral 14 28
4 Satisfied 15 30
5 Very satisfied 12 24
Total 50 100

CHART 14

30

25

20

15

10

0
Very dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very satisfied

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 58% of respondents (12% very dissatisfied and 6% dissatisfied)
expressed agreement with the opinion, 28% remained neutral, and 30% very satisfied and 24% very
satisfied
TABLE 15

15. 1 am satisfied with the level of cooperation among

colleagues.

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Very dissatisfied 12 24
2 Dissatisfied 5 10
3 Neutral 9 18
4 Satisfied 11 22
5 Very satisfied 13 26
Total 50 100
CHART 15

30

25

20

15

10

0
Very dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very satisfied

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 58% of respondents (24% very dissatisfied and 10%
dissatisfied) expressed agreement with the opinion, 18% remained neutral, and 22% very satisfied
and 26% very satisfied
TABLE 16

16.1 am satisfied with the organization's efforts to maintain a stress free environment.

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Very dissatisfied 11 22
2 Dissatisfied 10 20
3 Neutral 11 22
4 Satisfied 16 32
5 Very satisfied 2 4
Total 50 100

CHART 16

30

25

20

15

10

0
Very dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very satisfied

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 76% of respondents (22% very dissatisfied and 20%
dissatisfied) expressed agreement with the opinion, 22% remained neutral, and 32% very satisfied
and 4% very satisfied
 TABLE 17

17. I am satisfied with the clarity of my job responsibilities.

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Very dissatisfied 11 22
2 Dissatisfied 11 22
3 Neutral 10 20
4 Satisfied 10 20
5 Very satisfied 8 16
Total 50 100
CHART 17
30

25

20

15

10

0
Very dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very satisfied

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 84% of respondents (22% very dissatisfied and 22%
dissatisfied) expressed agreement with the opinion, 20% remained neutral, and 20% very satisfied
and 16% very satisfied
TABLE 18

18.1 am satisfied with communication between management and employees

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Very dissatisfied 9 18
2 Dissatisfied 13 26
3 Neutral 6 12
4 Satisfied 17 34
5 Very satisfied 5 10
Total 50 100

CHART 18

30

25

20

15

10

0
Very dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very satisfied

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 50% of respondents (18% very dissatisfied and 26%
dissatisfied) expressed agreement with the opinion, 12% remained neutral, and 34% very satisfied
and 10% very satisfied
TABLE 19

[Link] satisfied with my work life balance.

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Very dissatisfied 9 18
2 Dissatisfied 11 22
3 Neutral 12 24
4 Satisfied 8 16
5 Very satisfied 10 20
Total 50 100

CHART 19

30

25

20

15

10

0
Very dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very satisfied

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 46% of respondents (18% very dissatisfied and 22%
dissatisfied) expressed agreement with the opinion, 24% remained neutral, and 16% very satisfied
and 20% very satisfied
TABLE 20

20.1 am satisfied with how stress is managed in my organization.

SL NO Opinion No: of respondant percentage

1 Very dissatisfied 11 22
2 Dissatisfied 9 18
3 Neutral 12 24
4 Satisfied 8 16
5 Very satisfied 10 20
Total 50 100

CHART 20

30

25

20

15

10

0
Very dissatisfied Dissatisfied Neutral Satisfied Very satisfied

INTERPRETATION

From the analysis, it was found that 46% of respondents (22% very dissatisfied and 18%
dissatisfied) expressed agreement with the opinion, 24% remained neutral, and 16% very satisfied
and 20% very satisfied