RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

MODULE – 1

Contents: Introduction: Meaning of Research, Objectives of Engineering Research, and

Motivation in Engineering Research, Types of Engineering Research. Ethics in Engineering
Research: Ethics in Engineering Research Practice, Types of Research Misconduct, Ethical
Issues Related to Authorship. Literature Review and Technical Reading: New and Existing
Knowledge, Analysis and Synthesis of Prior Art, Bibliographic Databases, Web of Science,
Google and Google Scholar, Effective Search: The Way Forward, Introduction to Technical
Reading Conceptualizing Research, Critical and Creative Reading.

1. INTRODUCTION: Meaning of Research

Definition of Research:
Research is a careful, systematic, and objective process aimed at discovering new knowledge or
confirming existing knowledge. It involves formulating questions or hypotheses, collecting, and
analyzing data, and drawing conclusions to solve problems or expand our understanding of a
particular subject.

Key Aspects of Research:

➢ Inquisitiveness: Research is driven by a curiosity to explore the unknown. It starts with a
desire to find answers or develop new insights.
➢ Original Contribution: The goal of research is not just to gather existing information but
to make an original contribution that adds to the current body of knowledge.
➢ Systematic Process: Research follows a structured approach, from identifying a problem
to collecting data, analyzing it, and arriving at conclusions.

The Research Cycle:

Research typically follows a cycle as shown in the diagram (Fig. 1):

Fig. 1. The research flow diagram

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 1

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

➢ Practical Problem: The process starts with identifying a practical problem that needs a
solution.
➢ Research Question: This problem motivates a research question, which narrows down the
focus of the investigation.
➢ Research Project: The research question defines the scope of the research project, which
is a set of activities designed to find answers.
➢ Result or Answer: The project leads to results or answers, which help solve the original
problem.

Purpose of Research:
The purpose of research is not just to accumulate information but to connect different areas of
knowledge, solve real-world problems, and gain new insights. A well-conducted research project
strikes a balance between what is achievable and the value of its contribution.

Categories of Knowledge in Research:

Research generates knowledge in three overlapping categories (Fig. 2):
➢ Observation: Gathering data through various methods like measurements, surveys, or
experiments. Observation is the foundation of research as it provides the raw data needed
for analysis.
➢ Models: Simplified representations of complex systems, often using mathematical
equations, graphs, or statistical relationships, to help understand the data collected
through observation.
➢ Processes: These are methods or algorithms that describe how to achieve a particular
outcome, such as a specific procedure or reference design.

Fig. 2. The categories of knowledge in research

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 2

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

Importance of Research in Engineering:

In engineering, research plays a crucial role in:
➢ Solving practical problems.
➢ Advancing technology and innovation.
➢ Developing new processes and models.
➢ Enhancing safety, efficiency, and sustainability in engineering practices.

Research in engineering often involves moving from a broad area (e.g., control systems) to a
specific topic (e.g., control of microbial fuel cells) and then to a focused problem (e.g., adaptive
control of single-chamber microbial fuel cells). This journey can also happen in reverse, where
solving one problem leads to exploring related areas.

In summary, research is an ongoing process of discovery, problem-solving, and knowledge

creation that is essential for innovation and progress in engineering and other fields. By
systematically collecting and analyzing data, research helps us understand the world better and
find solutions to complex challenges.

1.1. Objectives of Engineering Research

The primary objective of engineering research is to solve significant and novel problems that can
lead to advancements in technology and knowledge. Since the outcome of the research is
unknown at the start, the process involves a certain level of uncertainty and exploration.

Key Objectives:
➢ Problem Solving: Engineering research aims to address new and important challenges.
These could range from improving existing technologies to creating innovative solutions
for emerging issues.
➢ Discovery: Research involves discovering new knowledge or insights. The conclusion or
result is unknown at the beginning, making the research process exploratory.
➢ Targeting Unknowns: When starting a research project, the initial guess or hypothesis acts
as a target. This guess, though based on intuition, circumstantial evidence, and
imagination, helps to focus the research efforts. However, the initial hypothesis might be
incorrect, leading to new avenues of investigation.
➢ Adaptation and Serendipity: During the research process, initial targets may need to be
adjusted, new techniques may be required, or unexpected results (serendipity) may lead
to valuable discoveries. The ability to adapt and explore new directions is a crucial
objective in engineering research.
➢ Thorough Investigation: Successful engineering research relies on thorough investigation
into guidelines, standards, and best practices. This ensures that the research is robust and
can prevent failures with significant consequences. The ability to conduct accurate

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 3

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

research and clearly communicate the findings is essential for informed decision-making
in both academic and professional settings.
➢ Application of Scientific Methods: The main aim is to apply scientific approaches to
answer open questions. Research methods may vary depending on the nature of the study
but generally include:
o Exploratory or Formulative Research: Investigating a new area to generate ideas
or hypotheses.
o Descriptive Research: Describing characteristics or functions of a phenomenon.
o Diagnostic Research: Determining the cause of a problem.
o Hypothesis-Testing Research: Testing a hypothesis through experimentation and
observation.
➢ Theoretical and Applied Knowledge: The objective of engineering research is not just
about achieving a desired result but also about expanding both theoretical and practical
knowledge. Even if a desired outcome is not achieved, understanding the reasons behind
the failure is also valuable. This understanding can contribute to ongoing research and
pave the way for others to find alternative solutions.

In essence, the objectives of engineering research involve solving problems, discovering new
knowledge, adapting to unexpected outcomes, and expanding both theoretical and practical
knowledge. The process of research is not linear but requires flexibility, persistence, and the
ability to learn from both successes and failures.

1.2. Motivation in Engineering Research

Motivation in engineering research can stem from various internal and external factors. These
motivations drive researchers to explore, innovate, and solve complex problems, contributing to
the advancement of knowledge and technology.
➢ Intrinsic motivations such as interest, challenge, learning, meaning, and purpose are
linked to strong creative performance in research.
➢ Extrinsic motivating factors, including rewards like money, fame, awards, praise, and
status, can be powerful but may sometimes block creativity.
➢ Research outcomes, such as obtaining a patent, can lead to financial success and
recognition, motivating researchers to excel.
➢ Social influences like competition, collaboration, commitment, and encouragement can
drive individuals to pursue research, often inspired by peers or rivals.
➢ Personal motivation can stem from the desire to solve unsolved problems, intellectual joy,
service to the community, and the pursuit of respectability.
➢ A mix of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations may include wanting to surpass global
achievements, improving technology, contributing to society, and fulfilling a historical
legacy.

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 4

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

➢ External factors such as government directives, funding opportunities in specific areas,

and employment terms can also play a role in motivating researchers.

1.3. Types of Engineering Research

The types of engineering research are as follows:
a. Descriptive vs. Analytical Research
Descriptive research:
• Focuses on describing the current state of a particular topic or problem.
• Involves comparing, correlating and fact-finding to understand what is happening.
• The researcher doesn’t control the variables but reports them as they are.
• Example: Studying traffic patterns to see how they change during rush hours.
Analytical research:
• Uses existing information or data to analyze and evaluate critically.
• It involves deeper investigation into why something is happening, based on
already available data.
• Example: Analyzing the effectiveness of a new traffic signal system using past
data.
b. Applied vs. Fundamental Research
Applied research:
• Aimed at solving specific, real-world problems.
• Often directly useful to organizations or industries.
• Example: Developing a new material to improve car safety.
Fundamental research:
• Focuses on gaining a deeper understanding of natural phenomena or concepts.
• It doesn’t have immediate practical applications but builds a foundation for future
applications.
• Example: Studying the properties of a new metal without a specific end-use in
mind.
c. Quantitative vs. Qualitative Research
Quantitative research:
• Involves collecting numerical data and using statistical methods to draw
conclusions.
• Usually requires a large number of samples to ensure accuracy.
• Example: Measuring the strength of different materials used in construction.
Qualitative research:
• Focuses on understanding behaviors, experiences or concepts through verbal
descriptions or case studies.
• Involves fewer samples but provides detailed insights.

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 5

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

• Example: Interviewing engineers to understand their challenges in using new

technologies.

2. ETHICS IN ENGINEERING RESEARCH

Ethics in engineering research refers to the principles and guidelines that govern the conduct of
researchers, ensuring that their work adheres to moral standards and societal values. These
ethical standards are essential for maintaining the integrity, transparency, and trustworthiness of
research outcomes. While ethics are not laws, they often inform legal frameworks, as they reflect
the shared values and expectations of society. In the context of research, ethics guide decision-
making processes, from the formulation of research questions to the dissemination of results.

The importance of ethics in research has been recognized globally, with international norms
established as early as the adoption of the Nuremberg Code in 1947. These norms serve as a
foundation for ensuring that research is conducted in a manner that respects the rights and
dignity of individuals and communities involved. In engineering research, ethics not only address
issues related to the conduct of research but also examine the responsible application of research
outcomes, ensuring that technological advancements benefit society without causing harm.

Moreover, ethical considerations in research are not limited to individual conduct but extend to
the broader research community. Issues such as authorship, coauthorship, and the fair attribution
of credit are critical in maintaining the integrity of collaborative research efforts. As the research
landscape becomes increasingly interconnected, addressing these ethical challenges is crucial for
fostering a culture of respect, responsibility, and fairness in engineering research.

Overall, ethics in engineering research play a vital role in guiding researchers to make informed
and morally sound decisions, ensuring that their work contributes positively to society while
upholding the highest standards of integrity.

2.1. Ethics in Engineering Research Practice

➢ Ethical Concerns in Technological Development:
o Technological advancements raise various ethical concerns, particularly in areas
such as privacy, data usage, and surveillance systems.
o Engineering researchers must make ethical decisions regarding their research and
are responsible for the outcomes and impacts on society, especially when humans
are directly affected.
➢ Importance of Ethics in Data Usage:
o With unprecedented access to data, researchers must carefully consider the ethical
implications of how they use and analyze this information.
o Not all actions that are technically possible with data should be pursued; ethical
guidelines help determine what is acceptable and what is not.

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 6

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

➢ Ethics as a Guiding Framework:

o Engineering ethics provide a "rule book" that helps researchers navigate decisions
regarding what is permissible in their work.
o This framework guides researchers in making choices that are not only technically
sound but also morally responsible.
➢ Influence of Ethical Decisions on Technology:
o Setting Requirements: At the start of a project, researchers can influence the
ethical impact of their work by setting ethically sound requirements that guide the
development process.
o Design Process: During the design phase, ethical considerations must be
considered when prioritizing different requirements and making design decisions.
o Choosing Alternatives: Researchers often face choices between different solutions
that fulfill similar functions; ethical considerations should guide these choices to
ensure the best outcome for society.
➢ Managing Risks and Unintended Consequences:
o Research outcomes can have unintended and potentially harmful side effects. It is
an ethical responsibility of researchers to minimize these risks and consider safer
alternatives.
o Where possible, designs should be made inherently safe by incorporating safety
factors, multiple independent safety barriers, or supervisory mechanisms that can
take over if the primary system fails.
➢ Responsibility of Researchers:
o Researchers must actively consider the ethical implications of their work
throughout the research process, from the initial design to the final
implementation and beyond.
o Ensuring that their research minimizes harm and maximizes benefits to society is
a fundamental ethical obligation in engineering research.

2.2. Types of Research Misconduct

Research misconduct involves unethical practices that undermine the integrity, credibility, and
progress of scientific and engineering research. Some of them are listed below.
➢ Fabrication (Illegitimate creation of data):
o Fabrication involves inventing data or experiments without actually conducting
them. This often happens when there is pressure to produce results quickly,
leading researchers to create data based on assumptions rather than actual
findings.
o Fabricated data can mislead the scientific community, resulting in false
information entering the literature, and can delay genuine progress in the field.
➢ Falsification (Inappropriate alteration of data):

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 7

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

o Falsification occurs when data or results are altered to fit a desired hypothesis,
even when the real data suggests otherwise.
o This manipulation can significantly harm the credibility of research, leading to
incorrect conclusions and hindering the progress of engineering advancements.
➢ Plagiarism (Taking others’ work without attribution):
o Plagiarism involves using someone else’s work—whether it be text, data, figures,
or ideas-without proper acknowledgment. This also includes self-plagiarism,
where a researcher reuses their own previously published work without citation.
o With the widespread availability of content online, plagiarism has become easier
to commit, but it is also easier to detect using software tools. However, these tools
can only provide similarity scores, and human judgment is still needed to
determine actual plagiarism.
o Simple practices like paraphrasing and summarizing while properly citing sources
can help avoid plagiarism. It’s important to differentiate between one’s own ideas
and those borrowed from others.
➢ Other Aspects of Research Misconduct:
o Serious deviations from accepted research practices, such as fraudulent behavior
that involves both deception and harm, also constitute misconduct.
o Ethical violations, such as submitting the same article to multiple journals
simultaneously, violate publication policies and can lead to retractions or other
consequences.
o Mistakes found in published work are often not publicly reported unless corrected
by a diligent researcher, which can result in misinformation persisting in the
literature.

Research misconduct, including fabrication, falsification, plagiarism, and other unethical

practices, can severely damage the credibility of engineering research. It’s crucial for researchers
to adhere to ethical standards to maintain the integrity of their work and contribute positively to
the scientific community.

2.3. Ethical Issues Related to Authorship

Academic authorship carries the responsibility of communicating scholarly work, establishing
priority for discoveries, and building reputation while ensuring ethical conduct throughout the
research and publication process.

Key ethical issues related to authorship in engineering research include:

➢ Authorship Attribution: Proper credit must be given only to those who have significantly
contributed to the research design, data interpretation, or writing of the paper. Authorship
establishes accountability and should reflect genuine contributions.

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 8

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

➢ Guest and Gift Authorship: Including individuals as coauthors who have made little or no
contribution (guest or gift authorship) dilutes the efforts of those who actually worked on
the research and is considered unethical.
➢ Career-Boost Authorship: Dubiously granting coauthorship to junior faculty or students
to help their career prospects, without their significant contribution, is another form of
unethical authorship.
➢ Career-Preservation Authorship: Adding administrators or superiors as coauthors to
maintain good relations (quid pro quo) without their actual involvement in the research is
also unethical.
➢ Ghost Authorship: Failing to list a significant contributor as an author due to undisclosed
conflicts of interest or other reasons leads to ghost authorship, which is unethical and
misrepresents the true contributors.
➢ Reciprocal Authorship: Listing individuals as coauthors without genuine collaboration,
merely as a reciprocal gesture, undermines the integrity of authorship.
➢ Sole-Authored Work with Unacknowledged Contributions: When a sole author
acknowledges significant contributions from others without granting coauthorship, it
misrepresents the true effort involved.
➢ Coauthor Consent: All coauthors must be fully aware of and agree to the content and
submission of the paper. Ethical authorship requires transparency and mutual consent
among all contributors.
➢ Double Submission: Submitting the same paper to multiple forums simultaneously is
unethical and violates the principle of originality that reputable journals uphold.
Ethical authorship practices ensure that credit is appropriately assigned, accountability is
maintained, and the integrity of the research process is preserved.

3. LITERATURE REVIEW AND TECHNICAL READING

The primary goal of a literature review is to explore existing content, ideas, and approaches
within the literature to accurately identify and define a problem that may only be vaguely
understood at the outset. A well-conducted literature review helps advocate for a specific
approach to understanding the problem and assess the methods used by others. It also ensures
that the research undertaken will contribute something new and innovative to the field. The
quality of the literature review can be judged by its breadth and depth of coverage, clarity, rigor,
consistency, and the effectiveness of the analysis.

3.1. New and Existing Knowledge

New knowledge in research is always built upon the foundation of existing knowledge. It is
essential to understand what is already known in a field to identify gaps and make a case for the
significance and originality of the new research. The interpretation of new knowledge can vary
greatly depending on a researcher’s background, and it gains relevance when placed in the
context of existing problems or challenges.

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 9

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

To generate new knowledge, one must first thoroughly review the existing literature, which
includes both long-established knowledge often found in textbooks and more recent findings
typically published in research papers. Textbooks provide a solid foundation by covering the
basics, while research papers push the boundaries of what is known by introducing new ideas
and discoveries. Understanding both is crucial for creating a strong basis for new research,
making it more resistant to challenge.

The process of conducting a literature review is essential for connecting new research with
existing knowledge. A good literature review explains how new research builds upon what has
been done before, providing context and justification for further investigation. It helps identify
inconsistencies, gaps, and areas for potential growth, ensuring that the new research makes a
meaningful contribution to the field.

A literature review should summarize what is already known, detail key concepts, and describe
the relationships between them. It should also point out any shortcomings or contradictions in the
existing literature, providing a clear rationale for why further work is necessary. A well-executed
literature review not only establishes a strong foundation for new research but also opens new
avenues for exploration.

3.2. Analysis and Synthesis of Prior Art

To conduct a thorough analysis and synthesis of prior art during a literature review, the
researcher must systematically break down the collected sources, typically articles, to identify
valuable content and integrate these findings. The literature survey grid, as illustrated in Table 1,
is a tool to organize and categorize information across various topics and sources.
Table 1. The literature survey grid

Steps in Analyzing Relevant Information:

➢ Understand the Hypothesis: Identify the central question or hypothesis each source
addresses.
➢ Understand Models and Experimental Conditions: Analyze the models and experimental
setups used in the studies to comprehend the methodology.

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 10

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

➢ Make Connections: Establish connections between different sources and identify how
they relate or differ from each other.
➢ Compare and Contrast: Highlight the similarities and differences between the findings of
various sources.
➢ Identify Strengths and Loopholes: Assess the strong points of each study and identify any
gaps or weaknesses in the research.

Critical Evaluation of Sources:

➢ Authority: Check the credentials of the authors and the credibility of the publication.
➢ Accuracy: Evaluate the reliability of the information by checking references and
comparing it with other sources.
➢ Scope: Ensure that the source is suitable for the research level and topic.

Goal of Literature Survey:

The primary aim is to uncover new areas for research by identifying unsolved issues and
problems in existing models or experimental designs. The process involves critically evaluating
each resource to ensure it is appropriate and relevant for the intended research.

Using a literature survey grid allows the researcher to organize their findings effectively, making
it easier to synthesize the information and draw meaningful conclusions.

3.3. Bibliographic Databases

Bibliographic databases are abstracting and indexing services that provide citation-related
information and, in many cases, abstracts of research articles from scholarly literature. These
databases are essential tools for researchers, allowing them to perform comprehensive searches
across a vast array of academic publications. Relying on a single database can be limiting due to
its specific shortcomings, so it is advisable for researchers to use multiple databases to ensure a
thorough and high-quality literature search.

By utilizing various bibliographic databases, researchers can gather a wide range of relevant
information and quickly identify the resources that are most applicable to their research topic or
problem. While there are many bibliographic databases available, here we will focus on a few
that are particularly popular and widely used by engineering researchers. This list is not
exhaustive but provides a starting point for effective literature searching in the field of
engineering.

3.3.1. Web of Science

Web of Science (formerly known as ISI or Thomson Reuters) is a comprehensive platform that
includes multiple databases and specialized tools, making it a valuable resource for scholarly

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 11

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

research. It requires an institutional license and allows researchers to search for materials within
specific fields, such as title, topic, author, and address, using a drop-down menu.

The platform offers various features to refine search results, including sorting by the number of
citations or publication date. Researchers can narrow their search by using quotes around
phrases, adding keywords, or utilizing the "Refine Results" panel to filter by material type, date,
language, and more. Expanding the search can be achieved by exploring alternate word endings,
breaking down search concepts, using alternate search terms, and employing the database’s
features to find additional references.

One of the most powerful tools within Web of Science is the "Cited Reference Search" option,
which allows researchers to trace articles that have cited a previously published paper. This
feature helps in identifying how a familiar idea has been applied, improved, or extended in
subsequent research.

Overall, Web of Science provides a structured and flexible search environment that enables
researchers to effectively find relevant sources, optimize their time, and gather comprehensive
information. The platform's built-in fields and detailed search results-including title, authors,
journal type, volume, issue number, year of publication, abstract, and keywords-assist
researchers in deciding whether to acquire the full version of a paper.

3.3.2. Google and Google Scholar

Google is an excellent starting point for research, particularly when exploring a new topic. It can
help find freely available information, such as reports from governments, organizations, and
companies. However, it comes with certain limitations:
➢ Lack of Quality Control: Google searches the entire internet without filtering the quality
of results, so you may not know the reliability of the sources.
➢ Limited Search Refinement: Google has basic search functionality, making it challenging
to narrow down search results effectively.

Google Scholar offers a more focused search by limiting results to scholarly literature, but it also
has its limitations:
➢ Inconsistent Scholarly Quality: Some results may appear scholarly but might not hold up
upon further inspection.
➢ Incomplete Coverage: Not all publishers make their content available to Google Scholar,
so it may not provide comprehensive search results.
➢ Limited Search Functionality: Similar to Google, Google Scholar has basic search
refinement options.

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 12

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

To improve search results in Google and Google Scholar, you can use search operators. These
operators help refine your searches, making them more relevant:
➢ OR: Broadens your search by including synonyms or variations of a term. Example:
Synchronous OR asynchronous.
➢ Brackets/Parentheses (): Group synonyms together while combining them with another
concept. Example: RAM (synchronous OR asynchronous).
➢ Quotation Marks "": Narrows the search by treating words as a phrase. Example: "Texas
Instruments".
➢ Site: Limits the search to a specific domain or website. Example: site:[Link].
➢ Filetype: Limits the search to a specific file type, like PDFs. Example: filetype:pdf.

Additionally, Google’s "Search Tools" button allows for further refinement, such as filtering
results by date. However, while Google and Google Scholar are useful, they should not be the
only tools used for scholarly research. Academic databases often provide more focused and
higher-quality results due to better quality control and advanced search functionality.

For more effective and reliable research, it's recommended to use academic databases alongside
Google Scholar. Each database offers different coverage based on subject areas, publication
types, and date ranges, but the search techniques remain largely the same.

3.4. Effective Search: The Way Forward

A scholarly publication is typically authored by experts in a specific field, citing all sources used
and often peer-reviewed for accuracy and validity. These works are intended for an audience of
fellow experts and students, making the content more complex and advanced than general
magazines. While most engineering researchers refer to scholarly journals, books, or peer-
reviewed sources, popular publications can also be valuable for understanding trends and news in
the field, although they may not contain original research outcomes.

To conduct a comprehensive search, researchers must utilize all available search tools. No single
source will provide all the necessary information, so it is crucial to explore various resources.
Additionally, not all information is available online, and it can take time for scholarly
information to be published. In cases where specific studies are unavailable, researchers should
seek out related studies or broader information that could apply to their topic.

The search process is iterative and involves:

➢ Experimenting with different keywords and operators.
➢ Evaluating and filtering results.
➢ Modifying the search as needed.
➢ Reviewing citations and references from relevant articles.

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 13

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

After completing the search, critical reading and summarizing of the findings are essential.
Comparing and contrasting the information is necessary to identify missing links and challenges
in study. This process is continuous and cyclical, often requiring revisiting sources as the
research progresses.
Developing the skill to efficiently parse complex, math-heavy articles is crucial for success in
engineering research. This skill is built over time through extensive reading, seeking clarification
on confusing parts, and relevant coursework.

Finally, while it is easy to spend a significant amount of time on a literature survey, it is

important not to lose sight of the goal: to develop one's ideas and build upon the existing
knowledge. Literature surveys and research are ongoing processes that evolve as new literature
emerges and as the researcher's understanding deepens. For Ph.D. scholars, an extensive
literature survey is mandatory, often leading to the development of a synopsis for approval by the
doctoral committee.

3.5. Introduction to Technical Reading

For an active researcher, staying updated with the latest research outcomes in their field is
essential. However, finding the right work to read can be challenging, as the literature is often
fragmented and scattered across various sources. Given the vast number of available research
papers, it is crucial to focus on reading materials that are directly relevant to one’s research
interests. Relying on peer-reviewed journals and books from reputable publishers is generally
more reliable than random articles found on the web.

The goal when reading an engineering research paper is to understand the technical contributions
the authors are making. Given the abundance of journal articles, adopting a quick, purposeful,
and efficient reading strategy is necessary. Unlike reading a newspaper, technical reading may
require multiple readings and significant time investment.

Steps for Effective Technical Reading:

➢ Initial Skim: Start by skimming the paper. Begin with the title and keywords to gauge
whether the paper is of interest. If it doesn't seem relevant, move on to another source.
➢ Abstract: If the title and keywords are promising, read the abstract to get an overview of
the paper. If it doesn't seem important to your field of study, stop reading further.
➢ Conclusion: If the abstract piques your interest, skip to the conclusion to see if the paper
aligns with your research goals.
➢ Figures and Tables: Quickly review the figures, tables, and their captions. These often
provide a good summary of the paper's findings without requiring a detailed read.
➢ Introduction: If the paper continues to be of interest, read the Introduction section to
understand the background, the purpose of the study, and how it advances the field.

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 14

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

➢ Results and Discussion: These sections are the core of the paper. Delve into them to grasp
the main contributions and findings.
➢ Methods/ Experimental Setup: Only read these sections if you need a deeper
understanding of the methodologies or are specifically interested in how the experiments
or models were conducted.

Throughout this process, consider not only the knowledge presented but also the reputation of
the authors who produced it. Continuously searching for and staying up-to-date with relevant
literature is crucial, especially as new work is constantly emerging. For smaller projects, a single
important paper may suffice, but for larger ones, a comprehensive literature search strategy is
necessary to manage the sheer volume of available work.

3.6. Conceptualizing Research

When conceptualizing research, the central focus should be on generating new knowledge that is
both original and significant to the research community. A good research problem should not
only be innovative but also solvable or achievable, which necessitates consideration of the
methods and tools that could be used to acquire this new knowledge. These elements—
significance, originality, and methodology—are typically grounded in the existing literature and
knowledge within the field.

Developing a solid research objective is challenging and requires a deep understanding of the
current state of knowledge in the field. By the time a researcher formulates a strong research
objective, they are likely already an expert on the topic. This level of expertise is crucial for
confidently defining a research objective that contributes meaningfully to the field. For Ph.D.-
level research, this process of conceptualizing research is often done independently, requiring
continuous engagement with the literature to identify a significant problem, the knowledge that
can address it, and a potential method to create that knowledge.

However, for research projects with a smaller scope, such as a master's thesis, conceptualizing
research can be more difficult due to time constraints and a lack of deep expertise. In these cases,
the guidance of a supervisor, who is already an expert in the field, becomes essential. A
knowledgeable supervisor can direct the researcher to key literature and help refine the research
objective.

For engineers, while building things is a natural inclination, it’s essential to ensure that the
research focus remains on generating new knowledge. Even if a project involves creating
something new, it should go beyond what any competent engineer could design. The goal is to
avoid having the work dismissed as obvious or unworthy of being considered true research.

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 15

 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY & INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS [22RIP]

3.7. Critical and Creative Reading

Reading a research paper requires a critical mindset. Rather than assuming the reported results or
arguments are correct, it's essential to approach the paper with a healthy level of skepticism. Key
questions to consider include: Have the authors addressed the right problem? Are there simpler
solutions that haven't been explored? What are the limitations of the study, both acknowledged
and overlooked? Are the assumptions reasonable? Does the paper have a logical flow, or is there
a flaw in the reasoning? These aspects, along with the relevance and importance of the work,
must be carefully evaluated.

A critical reader must exercise judgment and be bold in making assessments, while also being
flexible enough to discard previous erroneous conclusions. It's important to determine whether
the data presented in the paper effectively supports the argument and whether it was collected
and interpreted correctly. Additionally, consider whether a different dataset might have been
more compelling.

While critical reading focuses on identifying mistakes, creative reading is more challenging and
requires a positive, open-minded approach. Creative reading involves looking for other potential
applications, interesting generalizations, or extensions of the work that the authors might have
missed. It encourages exploring plausible modifications that could present important practical
challenges. Through creative reading, one can determine if there are opportunities to expand on
the work and identify the next steps for further research.

In summary, critical reading helps uncover flaws and limitations, while creative reading seeks to
find new opportunities and directions for future research. Both approaches are essential for a
comprehensive understanding of a research paper.

References
1. Deb D, Dey R, Balas VE. Engineering research methodology. A Practical Insight for
Researchers. 2019;153.
2. Thiel DV. Research methods for engineers. Cambridge University Press; 2014 Sep 11.
3. [Link]

DR. MADHU P, MCE, HASSAN 16