The Evolution of Anesthesia as a Business

Author

University Affiliation

Course

1
Introduction

The commercialization aspect of anesthesia is fascinating, succinctly delving into its

evolution from ether theatrics to today's sophisticated surgical solutions that have shaped

anesthesia as a thriving business. The period between 1840 and 1846 marked a profound shift in

surgical practice that culminated in a public demonstration of the anesthetic effect of ether during

surgery by Dr. T.G Morton.1 Before then, pain was an intrinsic part of surgery, with patients

forced to endure agonizing surgical interventions. While surgeons saw an opportunity to

revolutionize medicine, entrepreneurs interpreted the paradigm shift as a lucrative business

opportunity. The craft's commercialization began with Gardener Colton's demonstration of

nitrous oxide's intoxicating effects for a fee.1 Subsequently, the world has seen more individuals

banking on anesthesia as a chargeable service, imprinting medical innovation as a business.

The establishment of anesthesiology as a profession emerged at the dawn of the 20th

century. The involvement of pharmaceutical industries in refining the initial anesthetic drugs into

sophisticated, more potent solutions like isoflurane contributed to the rise of specialized

practitioners tasked with monitoring the drugs during surgeries.2 The era also witnessed an

integration of technology, giving rise to automated machines and advanced monitoring devices

that revolutionized the administration of anesthesia. Gradually, other contributing factors like

outpatient anesthesia and service outsourcing expanded the profession, with more individuals

exploring the field as a career. Today, anesthesia is a profitable endeavor enabling individuals to

commercialize optimal patient surgical experiences.

Technological Integration

Technological advancements announced the entry of pharmaceutical and related

companies into the anesthesia business. The initial anesthesia administration methods were basic

2
and less safe. However, as the field evolved, the need to ensure precision and patient safety

compounded. The need for standardized equipment primarily led to the development of

automated anesthesia machines, with manufacturing companies reaping profits from improved

anesthetic delivery. For instance, the discovery of single-bronchial intubation by Dr. Ralph

Waters during thoracic surgery in the 1920s led to the race by manufacturing companies to

perfect the revelation.3 Ergo, automated machines were a crucial backbone of the business aspect

of anesthesia.

The initial technological advancement inextricably annexed pharmaceutical

advancement. Moving into the 1930s, there was a sudden growth in the use of monitoring tools

and improved pharmaceutical agents in anesthesia administration to enhance patient safety.

Barbiturates such as Evipan and Pentothal, which would later evolve into the modern intravenous

anesthesia and electrocardiogram (ECG) for monitoring patients' vitals were introduced. 3 These

advancements opened the doors for pharmaceutical companies to join the market. Eventually,

companies such as Edgewood Arsenal, which researched and produced various anesthetic agents

like halothane, commercialized the field.4 Consequently, anesthesia opened a professional gap,

requiring more competent individuals to optimize the advanced tools and approaches to mediate

the growing demand for pain control.

The Professionalization of Anesthesia

As anesthesia evolved, there was a growing demand for the procedure, coupled with

increased demand for surgical interventions occasioned by World War traumas, leading to its

establishment as a profession. Literature indicates that many physicians were drafted to provide

World War II participants anesthesia during surgery. Ultimately, the membership of the

American Society of Anesthesiologists increased by over 230% in the 1940s.1 Previously,

3
anesthesia had been provided extempore by surgeons. However, the period marked a significant

turning point, leading to the establishment of the trade as a specialized field in medicine. This

elevated anesthesia's business implications.

The professional entrenchment of anesthesia as part of surgical teams occasioned the

emergence of subspecialties to offer the service to various segments of the patient populace. In

the post-war era, Dr. Virginia Apgar became the first anesthesiologist to attend to a newborn,

pioneering pediatric anesthesia.1 Consequently, other subspecialties, such as obstetric anesthesia,

were developed, expanding the field and attracting talented individuals to specialize in the craft.

Anesthesia providers then started incentivizing their profession, leading to the growth of the craft

as a business trading on service. Consequently, a market was established with the anesthetic

providers acting as the goods, the patients being the consumers, and the pharmaceuticals and

manufacturing companies acting as the supporting suppliers.

Modern Expansion

Outpatient Anesthesia

The professionalization of anesthesia led to the privatization of practice, making the

procedure more commercial. With a focus on business, anesthesiologists sought ways of making

the process shorter, more efficient, and patient-centered to attract more customers. This led to the

establishment of outpatient anesthesia, marked by the formation of the Society of Ambulatory

Anesthesia (SAMBA) in 1985.5 Ergo, patients could access anesthesia care outside the confines

of hospitals. Ambulatory Surgical Centers (ASCs) further cued anesthesia providers to adapt to

changing market dynamics, leading to different methods of service delivery. Consequently, the

profession expanded to include medical doctor anesthesiologists (MDA) and certified registered

nurse anesthesiologists (CRNAs). From a business perspective, outpatient anesthesia provided an

4
opportunity to individualize anesthesia service driven by patient demand, which is the crux of

profits. This evolution underscores the intricate interplay between the business dynamic of

considering consumer preference and the medical dynamic of ensuring patient satisfaction. Ergo,

more entrepreneurs enter the field to profit from the extra incentive of providing patient-centered

post and perioperative services.

Anesthesia Outsourcing

The evolution of anesthesia as a business has recently witnessed an outsourcing trend

where healthcare institutions delegate anesthesia delivery to external providers. More

specifically, the 21st century ushered in the shift whereby healthcare facilities concentrate on

patient care and depend on outsourcing companies that leverage economies of scale to administer

high-quality anesthesia while maximizing profits.6 For instance, companies such as YPS

Anesthesia, run by Tracy Young, employ skilled anesthesiologists and CRNAs who provide

comprehensive on-demand services to various hospitals, including pre-operative, intraoperative

and post-operative care.7 This evolution introduces a novel player in the market. Ultimately, it

diversifies the field as each service provider adapts to the changes to obtain maximum profit.

Current Anesthesia Service Provision Models

As anesthesia outsourcing developed roots within the healthcare fraternity, leading to a

spike in independent contractor arrangements, anesthesia providers began to explore more

profitable delivery models. Ergo, in recent times, there has been an increased division within the

anesthesia providers' workforce, resulting in w-2 and 1099 anesthetists. Traditionally, providers

were employed under w-2 models as a labor blueprint with healthcare institutions tasked with

providing fixed salaries and organizing consistent work schedules.3 However, business insights

rather than policy frameworks inform current employment under the w-2 model. The anesthetists

5
who prefer the w-2 model seek additional benefits such as retirement and disability insurance

and state employment law protections, culminating in better remuneration incentives. 8 Similarly,

those who opt for the 1099 model are inspired by economic considerations such as the higher

income potential through fee-for-service models and flexible schedules that enable them to

pursue additional income avenues.8 Therefore, the growth of ACS, coupled with the rise in

anesthesia outsourcing, has led to business-oriented anesthesia service provision. Consequently,

authorities have had to step up the regulation paradigm to consolidate the market against intense

commercialization.

Regulation of Anesthesia Provision as a Business

The regulatory framework of anesthesia provision is stringent to ensure patient safety,

quality of care, and adherence to ethical standards despite highly competitive tactics prone to rise

in the business sphere. Federal and state regulatory bodies are mandated to strictly oversee

professional licensing and certification to ensure that anesthesia providers meet rigorous

educational and training standards despite being partially fuelled by financial gains. 9 Licensing

requires completion of accredited training to ensure flexibility does not compromise the quality

of care in anesthesiology.

The regulation has continuously leaned toward financial modulation. More specifically,

billing and reimbursement are strictly monitored to prevent fraud and ensure fair compensation

as the increase in parties involved in the market, including healthcare facilities, entrepreneurial

anesthetists, and independent contracting anesthesiology companies, increases the likelihood of

business malpractices. Ergo, the regulatory framework intends to balance making anesthesia

provision profitable and safeguarding patients' wellbeing.

Conclusion

6
 The evolution of anesthesia as a business has been a dynamic journey marked by the

discovery of a medical solution, technological advancement, and the emergence of an

entrepreneurial opportunity, culminating in stringent regulation to protect consumers. The

replacement of crude pain-numbing methods with sophisticated anesthetic procedures and drugs

led to the professionalization of anesthesia, creating a specialized cadre of professionals

competent in managing surgery-related pain. This propelled the emergence of different business

dynamics, including anesthesia outsourcing, outpatient anesthesia and diverse service provision.

To preserve patient safety in the resulting business environment, authorities have focused on

regulating the sphere and maintaining ethical standards and fair business practices.

7
 References

1. Abhyankar, Rima S., and Katherine M. Jessop. "From Craft to Profession: The

Development of Modern Anesthesiology: Part II." Missouri Medicine.2022;119(1):14-20.

[Link]

2. Pandya, Aniket N., Sana Z. Majid, and Manisha S. Desai. "The origins, evolution, and

spread of anesthesia monitoring standards: from Boston to across the world." Anesthesia

& Analgesia. 2021;132(3):890-898. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000005021

3. Moon, Jane S., and Maxime Cannesson. "A century of technology in anesthesia &

analgesia." Anesthesia & Analgesia. 2022;135(2S):S48-S61.

doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000006027

4. Zaremba, Kyle. "Investigation of Chlorine Gas, Phosgene Gas, and Mustard Gas:

Development, Use, Effects, and Treatments with a Focus on World War I." 2019.

[Link]

5. Rodriguez, Leopoldo V., and Kumar G. Belani. "Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia

(SAMBA) Update." ASA Monitor. 2019;83(2):50-51.

6. La Forgia, Ambar, et al. "Association of physician management companies and private

equity investment with commercial health care prices paid to anesthesia

practitioners." JAMA Internal Medicine. 2022;182(4):396-404.

doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.0004

7. Stanley, J. and Pierce, S. (Hosts). The Business Side of Anesthesia. [Audio podcast

episode]. Beyond the Mask. 2021, November 4th. [Link]

153-the-business-side-of-anesthesia/3060/

8
8. Giron, Sarah E., and Sandra K. Bordi. "California Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist

Workforce Study." Nursing Outlook. 2023;71(6):102057.

[Link]

9. Bridges, Kathryn Harter, Julie Ryan McSwain, and Phillip Ryan Wilson. "To infinity and

beyond: the past, present, and future of tele-anesthesia." Anesthesia & Analgesia.

2020;130(2):276-284. [Link]