Building a Performance-Oriented Culture
Building a Performance-Oriented Culture
[Link]
Literature Review
Building Organizational Culture for
RECOMMENDED READINGS High Performance
JOHN P. KOTTER, “LEADING CHANGE:
WHY TRANSFORMATION EFFORTS FAIL,” Key Questions:
HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW
(MARCH 1995). What is the link between organizational
culture and performance?
CORPORATE LEADERSHIP COUNCIL, What are the characteristics of
BUILDING THE HIGH PERFORMANCE high-performing cultures?
WORKFORCE (2002)
What steps must organizations take to
build a strong culture?
NITIN NOHRIA, WILLIAM JOYCE, AND
BRUCE ROBERSON, “WHAT REALLY
WORKS,” HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW
(JULY 2003)
Catalog No.: This project was researched and written to fulfill the specific research request of a single member of the Corporate Leadership Council
CLC11C4UVP and as a result may not satisfy the information needs of other members. In its short-answer research, the Corporate Leadership Council
refrains from endorsing or recommending a particular product, service or program in any respect. Sources are contacted at random within
the parameters set by the requesting member, and the resulting sample is rarely of statistically significant size. That said, it is the goal of
the Corporate Leadership Council to provide a balanced review of the study topic within the parameters of this project. The Corporate
2003 Corporate
Leadership Council encourages members who have additional questions about this topic to assign short-answer research projects of their
Executive Board
own design.
BUILDING ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE PAGE 2
OCTOBER 2003
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This research provides information regarding the development of a strong organizational culture. In order to allow for
5
actionable steps, these findings are presented following John P. Kotter’s model for organizational change:
! Encourage the group to work together as a team: American University elected a design
team to head its performance culture change project and secured buy-in from the top down.
Four Cultural Models Assess work environment and culture among employees
The British home improvement chain B&Q uses employee engagement surveys to
The Hay Group has identified four
major cultural models that operate measure culture and identify urgent crises or opportunities that must be acted upon.
in organizations today. During its
cultural change, OSRAM Sylvania Figure 2. Culture and Engagement Surveys at BQ
moved from being predominantly
functional to time-based. The focus Industry: Retail
for each model is described below: Employee Size: 99,800
Revenue: $17.7 billion
! Functional—The specialization
of individuals B&Q believes that higher commitment and satisfaction among employees translates
! Process—Meeting obligations into better customer service, which in turn drives profits. The company uses a
to customers and continually 12-question telephone survey by Gallup to identify opportunities to improve employee
improving quality engagement across the company and at local levels. For example, when employees
! Time—Speed and technical responded that they did not have the right equipment for their job, the company
agility realized it needed to invest in more IT equipment for employees.16
! Network—Alliances that bring
together necessary efficiencies
and competencies
Although HR must take an active role in promoting cultural change, the call for
! Assemble a group with change must come from the top of the organization. The vision and direction for
enough power to lead the culture change can only be provided effectively by the CEO or the senior executive
change effort: Council profiled
companies lead efforts with a team. In successful transformations, the company’s top leaders come together and
17
values task force, brand develop a shared commitment to excellent performance through renewal.
manager committee, and values
manager. Assemble a Group to Lead the Change
! Encourage the group to work
together as a team: American While the leadership coalition may grow over time, it is necessary to have a founding
University elected a design team
to head its performance culture coalition that initiates change. In order to create initial coalitions to spur cultural
18
change project and secured initiatives, Council-profiled companies used the following strategies:
buy-in from the top down.
Table 1. Guiding Coalitions at Council-Profiled Companies
The values task force ensures that
company values remain a top priority by
Values Task Force planning values activities at business
units. The VP of HR coordinates
activities with task forces.
The brand manager committee includes
six senior executives responsible for
Brand Manager Committee setting strategic policies and managing
company values and brands.
A top leader, the VP of The VP meets with senior Managing employees are
Finance, spearheads the leaders to gain their buy-in brought into the initiative
change effort before formal meetings. through focus groups.
Build a new culture • Communicate with employees in a timely and candid way
79 percent • Compensate employees competitively, under systems that reward excellence
• Emphasize promotion from within and throughout the company
Support change management • Encourage employee involvement in decisions
81 percent • Focus on the positive behavior of employees
• Maintain effective performance appraisal systems
• Provide training for organizational/individual success
• Select managers and supervisors who demonstrate an appropriate blend of
—"Added Values,"
human relations skills and technical competence
IRS Employment Review
(September 2001)
During the mid-1990s, Alberto-Culver faced high turnover, flattened sales, and
decreasing profit margins on its best-known products. In order to radically boost
company performance, the company focused on strengthening its working culture.
One tactic involved education and rewards programs to awaken employees to their
role in the company’s success, resulting in the following communications avenues:
Communication Vehicles
INDIVIDUAL ECONOMIC VALUES GROWTH DEVELOPMENT LEADERS
Kotter recommends that
organizations use as many avenues IEV’s are short statements that GDLs mentor small groups of
as possible to communicate their describe how individual employees employees, enacting cultural change
vision. Council profiled companies contribute to the company’s at the individual level by helping
used the following avenues: profitability, empowering every employees achieve work-life balance,
employee in their position. live up to company goals, and take
! Banners and posters advantage of benefits. Outstanding
! Booklets and brochures GDLs receive stock bonuses.
! CD-ROM
! CEO e-mail and presentations
! Company newsletters
! Employee recognition kit Teach New Behaviors by Example
! Gift catalog with items that
contain values initiatives
! Manager discussions Kotter emphasizes the importance of the guiding coalition and other senior leaders to
! Training sessions demonstrate the desired culture. In successful cases of major change, executives
! Values toolkits consciously attempt to become a living symbol for the new corporate culture.
26
! Video presentations
! Wallet cards
! Web site Involve middle managers as role models and educators
Middle-managers are the most common leaders of culture change among general
—Corporate Leadership Council
The Implementation and Impact of employees, and it is critical to educate, involve, and support managers during cultural
27
Corporate Values change initiatives through workshops and follow-up activities. Individual
(June 2003) management style is also important in culture. Studies recommend that large firms
encourage managers to use more consultative leadership styles to improve
28
organizational culture. For example, GM used manager leadership training at one
29
of its facilities to improve culture and performance, and generate revenue.
While some organizational systems present a direct barrier to cultural change, others
may undermine the change by not representing the desired vision. In particular, work
environments reinforce culture on a daily basis by encouraging employees to exercise
cultural values. This section highlights the use of employee benefits to shape work
environments around a desired culture.
In 2002, Prudential launched a culture change project to reflect its external brand of
individual empowerment, “Plan from the Pru.” In order to ensure that the company and
its employees represent the brand, Prudential adjusted its benefit policies to instill the
values in the work environment and help employees feel empowered. The new
benefits are divided by corresponding cultural values below.35
To establish momentum and improve morale, any successful culture change effort
! Plan and create visible must show immediate and measurable improvements in performance. According to
performance improvements: Kotter, evidence of success is needed within 12 to 24 months to keep employees
Manager competency training at
motivated. This section presents tactics for creating short-term wins.
General Motors created
$4.4 million dollars in budget
savings. Plan and Create Visible Performance Improvements
! Recognizing and rewarding
employees involved in the These gains should be relevant to objectives, unambiguous in their improvement, and
improvements: Saturn’s visible throughout the organization. GM achieved a short-term performance win
risk/rewards system aligns
compensation with performance through manager competency training at one of its business units, as detailed below.
and development goals.
Figure 9. Manager Competency Training at GM
Industry: Auto Manufacturing
Employee Size: 350,000
Revenue: $186.7 billion
After noticing sub-par performance at its Service Parts Operations unit, General
Motors Corporation focused on leadership development to improve unit-wide culture.
The company used Development Dimensions International Consulting to conduct a
leadership intervention, testing management for desired competencies and providing
38
individualized development plans and coaches.
Two-Year Improvements
Manager
Competency Productivity up
Test 21 percent.
Individual Development $4.4 million saved in
Plan and Coaching operating budget.
The 2003 study published in the Employees should be held accountable for helping the organization achieve the
Harvard Business Review objectives of its cultural change effort. Ideally, senior management will articulate the
reports that 90 percent of key role of employees in the change’s success or failure early in the change process.
high-performing companies link In addition, companies should also tie the specific performance objectives of their
pay to performance, while only 39
change effort to employee rewards. Performance-based compensation is a key
15 percent of low-performing
tactic for aligning employees with corporate goals, used by companies like the Saturn.
companies did the same.
—Nitin Nohria, William Joyce, Figure 10. Linking Performance and Compensation at Saturn
and Bruce Roberson Industry: Auto Manufacturing
“What Really Works,” Subsidiary of GM
Harvard Business Review
(July 2003)
To ensure a performance-oriented culture, Saturn links performance to compensation.
Twelve percent of each employee’s base salary is tied to meeting specific performance
40
and development goals.
Kotter’s model asserts that new approaches are fragile and subject to regression
! Hire, promote, and develop until changes sink deeply into a company's culture. Therefore, it is critical keep the
employees who can implement change growing after initial successes by using the credibility of short-term wins to
the vision: Nokia incorporated
its core values into interview address other areas of the business that must be changed to support a culture of
41
questions to screen job high performance.
candidates for cultural fit.
! Reinvigorate the process with Hire, Promote, and Develop Employees Who Can Implement the Vision
new change agents: Skandia’s
unit-specific cultural
assessments ensure consistent Cultural change becomes permanent when it is rooted in social norms and shared
42
culture across departments and values. Organizations should ensure that cultural values and vision are shared
managers. company-wide through employee development and recruitment.
Organizations undertaking major cultural change develop new change initiatives over
the course of several years and cannot introduce every new initiative at once.
Instead, organizational leadership should continue introducing new change agents,
like the unit-specific assessments that ensure consistent culture at Skandia.
Senior executives at Skandia believe that the company’s innovative culture is a key to
future growth and competitive advantage. In order to ensure that all line managers are
supporting the same culture among employees, Skandia redesigned its balanced
scorecard survey to unit-specific work environments.45
Cultural
Survey
Employees at each unit HR reviews the surveys Line managers are held
complete surveys that to identify any unit accountable for culture;
assess work environment. “hot spots.” interventions occur where
needed.
Despite what success an organization has introducing change, leaders must also
! Articulate the connections plan to embed change in the permanent culture. This section addresses the two
between new behaviors and factors Kotter says are necessary for institutionalizing cultural change.
corporate success: Sears'
Employee-Customer-Profit chain
outlines employee contributions Articulate the Connections between New Behaviors and Success
to economic goals.
! Develop the means to ensure According to Kotter, the first factor in making cultural change permanent is
leadership development and communicating improvements to employees. Organizations must make a conscious
succession: Nokia embedded
its core values into the attempt to show people how the new approaches, behaviors, and attitude have
46
performance management helped improve performance. Sears had major success modeling these
system through values-based connections for employees, as demonstrated in the figure below.
behaviors.
Nokia’s Core Values Develop the Means to Ensure Leadership Development and Succession
The following values:
Kotter’s second factor is developing the next generation of top management to
Customer Satisfaction personify the new approach. Nokia created the values-based metrics for
Seeking the customer as the basis
of all Nokia’s operations
performance management described below to ensure employee development
48
focuses on its core cultural values.
Respect for the Individual
Treating employees, business
partners, and customers with Figure 13. Embedded Values in Performance Management
respect Industry: Telecommunications
Employee Size: 51,700
Achievement Revenue: $31.5 billion
Working toward a well-defined In order to foster a strong, entrepreneurial culture across its decentralized business
common goal and strategy units, Nokia created a set of core company values. To help employees demonstrate
these values, each one was linked to job-specific behavioral competencies which are
Continuous Learning evaluated in the performance management process.
Constantly looking for ways to
improve performance; having the Behavioral
courage to pursue new ideas Competency Performance
Nokia List management
Values __________ assesses
__________ values-based
__________ competencies
__________
Project Aims 1. What is the link between organizational culture and performance?
2. What are the characteristics of high-performing cultures?
3. What steps must organizations take to build a strong culture?
Guide to Tables and Figures Table 1: Guiding Coalitions at Council-Profiled Companies Page 5
Table 2: Methods for Creating Organizational Values Page 6
The Corporate Leadership Council has worked to ensure the accuracy of the information it provides
to its members. This project relies upon data obtained from many sources, however, and the Council
cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information or its analysis in all cases. Further, the Council is
not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. Its projects should not be
construed as professional advice on any particular set of facts or circumstances. Members requiring
such services are advised to consult an appropriate professional. Neither Corporate Executive Board
nor its programs is responsible for any claims or losses that may arise from any errors or omissions in
their reports, whether caused by Corporate Executive Board or its sources.
1
Corporate Leadership Council, Closing the Performance Gap, Washington: Corporate Executive Board (2002).
2
Nitin Nohria, William Joyce, and Bruce Roberson, "What Really Works," Harvard Business Review (July 2003).
(Obtained through EBSCO).
3
W. Matthew Juechter, Caroline Fisher, and Randall J. Alford, "Five Conditions for High-Performance Cultures,"
Training & Development (May 1998). (Obtained through EBSCO).
4
Corporate Leadership Council, Building the High-Performance Workforce,
Washington: Corporate Executive Board (2002).
5
John P. Kotter, "Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail," Harvard Business Review (March 1995).
(Obtained through Factiva).
6
John P. Kotter, "Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail."
7
Stephen Barthorpe, Rosanna Duncan, and Christopher Miller, “The Pluralistic Facets of Culture and Its Impact on
Construction,” Property Management (2000). (Obtained through Lexis-Nexis).
8
Corporate Leadership Council, Building the High-Performance Workforce.
9
Corporate Leadership Council, SAS Institute's Employee-Friendly Corporate Culture,
Washington: Corporate Executive Board (January 2001).
10
Richard Hagberg and Julie Heifitz, “Corporate Culture/Organizational Culture: Understanding and Assessment,”
Hagberg Consulting Group (Date Unknown).
(Obtained through [Link] [Accessed 15 September 2003].
11
Steve Palmer, "Organizational Culture Assessments—What Are They and Why Do One?"
Center for Organization Effectiveness (Fall 1999). (Obtained through [Link]
[Accessed 15 September 2003].
12
Steve Palmer, "Organizational Culture Assessments—What Are They and Why Do One?"
13
James C. Sarros, et. al., "The Organizational Culture Profile of Australian Enterprises,"
International Federation of Scholarly Associations of Management (2002). (Obtained through [Link]
[Accessed 15 September 2003].
14
Frank T. Gallo and James R. Stokely, “Positive Culture Change at OSRAM SYLVANIA,” Human Resources Planning
(Date Unknown). (Obtained through EBSCO).
15
Frank T. Gallo and James R. Stokely, “Positive Culture Change at OSRAM SYLVANIA.”
16
Author Unknown, "Rules of Engagement," IRS Employment Review (9 May 2003).
(Obtained through [Link] [Accessed 16 October 2003].
17
John P. Kotter, "Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail."
18
Corporate Leadership Council, The Implementation and Impact of Corporate Values,
Washington: Corporate Executive Board (June 2003).
19
Corporate Leadership Council, Innovation and Agility.
20
Mike Foster, "Create a Positive Organizational Culture to Reduce Internet Misuse," National Public Accountant
(September 2001). (Obtained through EBSCO).
21
Corporate Leadership Council, The Implementation and Impact of Corporate Values.
22
Author Unknown, “Added Values,” IRS Employment Review 711 (September 2000).
(Obtained through [Link]
23
Corporate Leadership Council, Implementing Values in an Organization,
Washington: Corporate Executive Board (August 2001).
24
John P. Kotter, "Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail."
25
Gerald Ledford, Jon Wendenhof, and James Strahley, “Realizing a Corporate Philosophy,” Organizational Dynamics
(Winter 1995). (Obtained through Lexis-Nexis, a division of Reed Elsevier, Incorporated).
26
John P. Kotter, "Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail."
27
Donald T. Tosti and Rodger D. Stotz, "Building Your Brand from the Inside Out."
28
Julia Connell, "Influence of Firm Size on Organizational Culture and Employee Morale,"
Journal of Management Research (September/December 2001). (Obtained through EBSCO).
29
Steven R. Davis, Jay H. Lucas, and Donald R. Marcotte, "GM Links Better Leaders to Better Business," Workforce
(April 1998). (Obtained through [Link] [Accessed 15 September 2003].
30
John P. Kotter, "Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail."
31
John P. Kotter, "Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail."
32
Angela Baron, “Winning Ways With Culture,” Personnel Management (1 October 1994).
33
Fay Hansen, “Power to the Line People,” Workforce (June 2003).
(Obtained through [Link] [Accessed 15 September 2003].
34
Naomi Weiss, "How Starbucks Impassions Workers to Drive Growth," Workforce (1 August 1998).
(Obtained through Factiva).
35
Author Unknown, "Pru Uses Flex to Level Field," Employee Benefits (3 February 2003). (Obtained through Factiva).
36
W. Matthew Juechter, Caroline Fisher, and Randall J. Alford, "Five Conditions for High-Performance Cultures.”
37
Corporate Leadership Council, Innovation and Agility.
38
Steven R. Davis, Jay H. Lucas, and Donald R. Marcotte, "GM Links Better Leaders to Better Business."
39
Barbara Parus, "Effective Rewards Support Culture Change," Workspan (1 November 2002).
(Obtained through Factiva).
40
Jeanne Meister, “The Quest for Lifetime Employability,” Journal of Business Strategy (May 1998).
(Obtained through Dow Jones Interactive).
41
John P. Kotter, "Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail."
42
John P. Kotter, "Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail."
43
Corporate Leadership Council, Innovation and Agility.
44
John P. Kotter, "Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail."
45
Corporate Leadership Council, Innovation and Agility.
46
John P. Kotter, "Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail."
47
Anthony J. Rucci, Steven P. Kirn, and Richard T. Quinn, "The Employee-Customer-Profit Chain at Sears,"
Harvard Business Review (January 1998). (Obtained through EBSCO).
48
Corporate Leadership Council, Innovation and Agility.