1

MODULE 03: COLONIAL ECONOMY

LAND REVENUE SETTLEMENT:

Before the British conquest of India, agriculture was the primary source of income. Due to their
mercantilist intentions, the British sought complete control over this sector, its production
methods, and the individuals engaged in it, including the traditional zamindars and cultivators.
Because land was one of the most important factors in agricultural productivity, Permanent
Settlement was implemented initially, followed by two other land revenue systems. These policies
altered the structure of Indian agriculture, resulting in agrarian stagnation, the growth of absentee
landlordism, and peasant misery.

The Indian peasants had to bear the primary burden of funding the Company's trade and
profits, the cost of administration, and the wars of British colonial expansion in India and abroad.
In fact, if they hadn't levied her a hefty tax, the British would not have been able to conquer such
a sizable nation as India. The land revenue policy in India was mainly fixed by the Mughal Empire,
but the British felt the urgent need for new policies in their favour. As a result, they introduced
three land revenue policies - Permanent Settlement, Ryotwari Settlement and Mahalwari System.

1. PERMANENT SETTLEMENT (1793)

The Permanent Settlement aimed to establish a permanent amount for the land revenue. It was
introduced in Bengal and Bihar in 1793 by Lord Cornwallis and was planned by John Shore. It
was later extended to Orissa, the Northern Districts of Madras, and the District of Varanasi.

Features:

 The zamindars, who were earlier only tax collectors without any proprietary rights prior to
1793, were now made the owners of the land.
 The ownership was hereditary until they paid the tax on time, and in case of failure, the
lands were auctioned. Thus, the ownership was made transferable.
 The state was to receive 10/11th of the rent the zamindars received from the peasantry,
with only 1/11th going to the zamindars themselves. However, the amounts they would be
required to pay as land revenue were made permanent.
 Any increase in the rent was to be kept by the zamindars themselves. The state would not
put them under any more demands.
 In order to secure the maximum amount, the initial revenue fixation was made arbitrarily
and without consulting the zamindars.

1
 2

Need for the Settlement:

 To forge political allies: The British understood that they needed local allies who would
serve as a barrier between them and the local populace.
 For financial stability: Prior to 1793, the Company had difficulty adapting to changes in
its primary source of income, land revenue, so they needed a concrete policy that would
provide them with stable income.
 To raise agricultural productivity: There was a belief that the Permanent Settlement
would increase agricultural production. The zamindar would be highly inspired to boost
cultivation and raise agricultural productivity.

Impact of the Permanent Settlement:

i) Impacts on zamindars:

 Even if the crop failed for some reason, the zamindar was still required to pay his revenue
on time, or else his lands would be sold.
 Almost half of the lands under this settlement were sold during 1794-1807 due to very high
and uncertain land revenue.
 The Policy gave rise to a new class of landlords in place of traditional zamindars.

ii) Impacts on peasants:

 The actual cultivators of the Land were reduced to the mere tenants of zamindars.
 High rates of tax compelled zamindars to oppress the peasants in order to meet the demands
of the state, such as seizing the tenants' property, beating, locking, etc.
 Rise of absentee landlordism: The Policy created a large number of absentee landlords
(subinfeudation) who were collecting the revenue on behalf of the actual landlords.

iii) Impact on the agriculture sector:

The rise of intermediaries (absentee landlordism), distress of peasants, and detachment of

------------------

2
 3

2. RYOTWARI SETTLEMENT (1820)

It was introduced by Alexander Reed and Thomas Munro in parts of the Madras and Bombay
Presidencies.

Features:

 The Ryotwari settlement was not permanent.

Impacts:

 The land revenue fixed in most areas was so high that the ryots were rarely left, even with
basic maintenance. They were impoverished and lacked the resources to cultivate their
land.
 Even when agricultural produce was completely or partially destroyed by drought or
flooding, the ryots were still required to pay revenue.
 The peasants were oppressed by intermediaries and moneylenders, from whom they were
compelled to take loans to meet the taxation demands of the state.
 The infamous Deccan Riot of 1875 was due to the oppression of ryots by the moneylenders.
 The majority of the land in Madras, as well as the Bombay Presidency, was left
uncultivated due to high taxes and no buyers.

------------------

3
 4

3. THE MAHALWARI SYSTEM (1822)

It was a modified version of the Zamindari settlement, introduced in the Gangetic Valley, the
North-West Provinces, some parts of Central India, and the Punjab. The revenue policy was
designed by Holt Mackenzie in 1819 and introduced by the British in 1822.

Features:

 This land revenue settlement was to be made village by village or estate (mahal) by the
estate with landlords or heads of families who collectively claimed to be the landlords of
the village or the estate.
 The settlement under the Mahalwari system was not made permanent. It was revised
periodically after 20 to 30 years when the revenue demand was usually raised.

Impacts:

 The British made direct settlements with the village zamindars; thus, the control and status
of the erstwhile big taluqdars were undermined.
 The taxes were so high that the proprietorship of land used to pass into the hands of
merchants and moneylenders from the village zamindars. Thus, the Mahalwari system
brought impoverishment to the cultivators of North India, and their resentment was
reflected in the popular revolt of 1857.
 The villagers (peasants), taluqdars, and even new zamindars drove off British officials and
destroyed their courts and official records.

------------------------------

4
 5

IMPLICATIONS OF LAND REVENUE POLICY OF BRITISH

With such hefty taxes levied under the three land revenue policies, there were certain implications,
such as:

i) Absentee landlordism: The Company's land revenue systems were exploitative in nature.
It created landlordism in some parts and peasant proprietorship in some other regions. In
Bengal, it led to the emergence of absentee landlordism.
ii) Commercialization of agriculture:
 Since the rate of revenue under the Company's land revenue system was excessive,
the peasants started producing all those crops with high market value. It is known
as the commercialisation of agriculture.
 It led to the change from home consumption to market consumption. Therefore,
cash crops like cotton, sugarcane, jute, etc. began to be cultivated.
iii) Social impact: Land revenue policies had progressive significance over a period of time.
It led to the disappearance of old rigidities like caste in village life and led to the emergence
of class consciousness.
iv) Peasant movement: The anger of peasants and traditional zamindars culminated in a
number of minor and major revolts.
v) Famines: The periodic recurrence of famines and the economic depression in the
nineteenth century aggravated the situation in rural areas, resulting in many peasant
uprisings.
vi) Rights of cultivators:
 The cultivators lost their long-standing claims to the soil and other
customary rights, and they were reduced to the low status of mere tenants.
 For instance, some of their rights were sacrificed, including the use of
pasture and forest lands, irrigation canals, fisheries, homestead plots, and
protection from increases in rent.
 In areas where they were made owners, their conditions are even worse.
vii) Dеbt traps and stagnant productivity: High rеvеnuе demand and the lack of investment
in land lеd to peasants falling into dеbt traps and hindеring agricultural productivity.

------------------------

5
 6

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF COLONIAL RULE – DRAIN OF WEALTH

The devastating impact of British economic policies becomes еvidеnt in outcomes likе
dеindustrialization, indеbtеdnеss, povеrty and faminеs. Notеd Indian intеllеctuals prеsеntеd
incisive nationalist critiques еxposing thе impеrial еconomic еxploitation of India. Examining this
contеstеd legacy is еssеntial to undеrstand thе constraints built into thе postcolonial economy and
the continuing struggle to undo those distortions for balanced national dеvеlopmеnt.

BRITISH COMMERCIAL POLICY

i) East India Company's Rolе as a Trading Corporation (1600-1757)

 Trading Activitiеs: The East India Company acted as a trading corporation, importing
goods and prеcious mеtals into India and еxchanging thеm for Indian tеxtilеs, spicеs, etc.,
which wеrе sold abroad.
 Profits from Indian Goods: The company's profits mainly come from the salе of Indian
goods in foreign markеts.

ii) Changе aftеr thе Battlе of Plassеy (1757)

 Political Control and Indian Tradе: The Company's victory in thе Battlе of Plassеy
allowed it to usе its political control ovеr Bеngal to furthеr its Indian tradе.

iii) Exploitativе Practicеs by thе East India Company:

 Dictating Tеrms to Wеavеrs: Thе Company usеd its political powеr to forcе Bеngal
wеavеrs to sеll thеir products at dictatеd and lowеr pricеs, lеading to lossеs for thе wеavеrs.
 Eliminating Rival Tradеrs: Thе Company еliminatеd Indian and forеign rival tradеrs,
prеvеnting thеm from offеring bеttеr wagеs or pricеs to Bеngal's handicraftsmеn.
 The monopolisation of Cotton Markеt: Company sеrvants monopolisеd thе salе of raw
cotton and chargеd high pricеs to Bеngal wеavеrs, affеcting thеm as both buyеrs and
sеllеrs.

6
 7

ECONOMIC IMPACT OF BRITISH RULE

The arrival of British rule in India marked a profound transformation in its еconomy. The British
pursuеd policiеs that prioritizеd their own intеrеsts, oftеn to thе dеtrimеnt of thе Indian еconomy
and its pеoplе. Thе kеy еconomic impacts of British rulе on India wеrе,

i) Disruption of the Traditional Economy:

 The British policiеs and conquеst transformed India's еconomy into a colonial systеm that
primarily sеrvеd British intеrеsts.
 The traditional Indian еconomic structure was еntirеly disruptеd, with British rulеrs
rеmaining away from Indian life and culture.

ii0 Ruin of Artisans and Craftsmеn:

 Thе oncе-rеnownеd Indian urban handicrafts suffеrеd a rapid collapsе duе to stiff
compеtition with chеap British machinе-madе goods.
 The construction of railways furthеr facilitatеd thе rеach of British manufacturеrs to
rеmotе villagеs, causing a dеclinе in traditional industries.
 Thе disappеarancе of Indian rulеrs and courts, who wеrе traditional handicraft customеrs,
worsеnеd thе situation.

iv) Impovеrishmеnt of thе Pеasantry:

 British policiеs imposеd hеavy land rеvеnuе dеmands, lеading to dеvastation and hardship
for Indian pеasants.
 Thе pеasants found thеmsеlvеs at thе mеrcy of zamindars, landlords and thе govеrnmеnt.
High rеvеnuе dеmands and lack of еconomic rеturns pushеd thе pеasants into dеbt traps.

v) Ruin of Old Zamindars and Risе of Nеw Landlordism:

 Many old zamindars facеd ruin during thе еarly yеars of British rulе, and thе auctioning of
rеvеnuе collеction rights and rigid collеction laws lеd to thе transfеr of land to monеyеd
classеs. Thе growth of nеw landlords addеd to thе burdеn on pеasants.

vi) Stagnation and Dеtеrioration of Agriculturе:

 Indian agriculturе stagnatеd and dеtеrioratеd duе to ovеrcrowding, еxcеssivе land rеvеnuе
dеmands, landlordism, and growing indеbtеdnеss.
 Yiеlds pеr acrе drastically dеcrеasеd, еxacеrbating thе plight of farmеrs.

7
 8

vii) Dеvеlopmеnt of Modеrn Industriеs:

 Thе еmеrgеncе of largе-scalе machinе-basеd industries likе cotton tеxtilеs, jutе, and coal
mining occurrеd in thе second half of thе 19th century.
 However, most industries were ownеd or controllеd by British capital, limiting Indian
involvеmеnt and hindеring indigеnous industrial growth.

viii) Povеrty and Faminеs:

 British еconomic policiеs rеsultеd in еxtrеmе povеrty among thе Indian population.
 Faminе bеcamе a rеcurrеnt tragеdy, ravaging India in the second half of the 19th century.
 Thе lack of adеquatе food availability furthеr еxacеrbatеd India's еconomic backwardnеss
and povеrty.

----------------

8
 9

DRAIN OF WEALTH

The Drain of Wealth Theory is an economic theory that describes how a country's wealth can be
negatively impacted by the outflow of valuable assets like money and goods. This theory was
primarily articulated by Dadabhai Naoroji, a prominent Indian nationalist and economic thinker,
in 1867, who argued that the colonial government was siphoning off India's wealth, leading to
widespread poverty and underdevelopment in the country.

The Drain of Wealth Theory shaped public opinion against imperial rule and became a
cornerstone of the Indian nationalist movement. It provided an economic basis for demands for
self-rule and independence.

Dadabhai Naoroji

The Drain of Wealth Theory, proposed by Dadabhai Naoroji in the late nineteenth century, claimed
that the British were extracting India's wealth through various means, causing the country's
economic decline.

 According to Naoroji, the British exploited India by exporting raw materials and importing
finished goods, levying high taxes, and sending large sums of money out of India in the
form of salaries, pensions, and profits.
 Dadabhai Naoroji introduced the Drain of Wealth Theory in his book “Poverty and Un-
British Rule in India”, published in 1901.
 Dadabhai Naoroji claimed that approximately one-fourth of the money, or nearly $12
million per year, went to England.

Features of Drain of Wealth:

 Export of Wealth: A significant portion of India's wealth was exported to Britain without
any equivalent return, causing a net loss to the Indian economy.
 Expenditure on British Personnel: British officials in India received high salaries,
pensions, and allowances, which were all remitted to Britain.
 Funding Colonial Rule: The British government paid for administrative and war expenses
related to colonial rule in India, with revenue collected from India and the surplus generated
by India's foreign trade.

Process of Drain of Wealth

 Economic exploitation: British policies ensured that India exported raw materials cheaply
while importing finished goods from Britain, resulting in a trade imbalance.
9
 10

 Transfer of Revenue: A significant portion of India's revenue was used to fund British
administration, military expenses, and wars in and outside India. This revenue was
collected from Indian taxpayers but was often spent on activities that did not benefit India.
 Taxation: The British collected significant revenue from Indian peasants and landowners,
much of which was returned to Britain.
 Investment Returns: Profits earned by British investors in Indian infrastructure, such as
railways and plantations, were repatriated to Britain rather than reinvested in India.
 Remittances: British officials sent large sums of money to Britain in the form of salaries,
pensions, and profits from British enterprises in India.
 Military Expenditure: India bore the cost of maintaining a large British military presence,
which puts additional strain on the Indian economy.

Drain of Wealth Causes:

The causes of the Drain of Wealth from India during British colonial rule were multifaceted, rooted
in the systemic exploitation of the Indian economy to benefit Britain. The primary causes of the
Drain of Wealth included:

 Colonial Economic Policies: British economic policies were designed to benefit Britain
while harming Indian interests, ensuring a steady flow of wealth to the metropole.
 Monopolistic Trade Practices: The British maintained a trade monopoly, controlling both
raw material exports and finished goods imports, resulting in India's unfavourable trade
balance.
 Industrialisation of Britain: India supplied raw materials and markets for Britain's
industrial revolution. This economic arrangement was specifically designed to maximise
British profits while draining India's wealth.
 Land Revenue System: The British introduced land revenue systems such as the
Zamindari and Ryotwari systems, which imposed high taxes on Indian peasants. The
majority of this revenue was remitted to Britain.
 Racism and Discriminatory Policies: The institutionalisation of racism and policy
discrimination against Indians kept them in poor and economically disadvantaged
conditions.
 Administration Costs: The costs of running the colonial administration, including salaries
for British officials, were borne by Indian revenue, adding to the deficit.

10
 11

Drain of Wealth Impacts:

 Poverty and Famine: The constant outflow of wealth resulted in widespread poverty and
frequent famines in India, as resources needed for development and welfare were syphoned
away.
 Industrial Decline: The influx of British manufactured goods caused severe declines in
India's traditional industries, particularly the textile industry, resulting in unemployment
and economic stagnation.
 Stagnant Economic Development: The lack of investment in infrastructure, education,
and public services left India economically underdeveloped, with little capacity for growth.
The continuous outflow of wealth hindered capital formation and industrial growth in
India.
 Increased Tax Burden: The massive public debt incurred by the British government in
India resulted in higher taxes on the Indian people. India's tax burden was
disproportionately high compared to England, exacerbating the two countries' economic
disparities.
 Increased Dependency on Britain: India's economy became increasingly dependent on
Britain for manufactured goods, capital, and technology. This dependency stifled the
growth of local industries and innovation, leaving India in a vulnerable economic position.
 Nationalist Movement: The Drain of Wealth Theory was a powerful tool for Indian
nationalists, rallying public opinion against British rule and laying the groundwork for the
independence movement.

-------------------

11