1
Running Head: REDUCING PHONE USE
Reducing Daily Phone Use Through Behavior Modification
Kaycee Leeds
PSY 3440
Oakland University
November 13, 2025
2
REDUCING PHONE USE
Reducing Daily Phone Use Through Behavior Modification
Almost all college students now use their smartphones on a regular basis. Phones provide
instant access to communication, entertainment, news, and social media, but they can also be
extremely distracting and mentally draining. Many students find themselves using their phones
significantly more than they intended, often without recognizing how much time they spend
scrolling throughout the day. Excessive phone use has been linked to procrastination, attention
deficits, sleep disruptions, mental health issues, and decreased productivity. Despite the many
advantages of smartphones, their constant use might have a detrimental impact on academic
performance, stress levels, and mood.
Research strongly supports the idea that reducing daily screen time might increase well-
being. In a randomized controlled experiment, Pieh et al. (2025) found that limiting smartphone
use to two hours or less per day resulted in significant improvements in stress, depressive
symptoms, sleep quality, and general well-being. Their findings revealed that even a minor
reduction in screen time might have a favorable impact on emotional functioning. Similarly,
Reed et al. (2023) found that lowering social media usage improved physical health, loneliness,
and immune function. Because college students are especially sensitive to the detrimental effects
of excessive screen use, findings like these are highly significant.
Personally, I find phone use to be a major source of distraction. I frequently go for my
phone while I should be studying, doing homework, or preparing for exams. I stay up too late on
my phone, and continual monitoring during the day gets in the way of productivity. Reducing my
daily phone use would help me manage my time more effectively and improve my mental health.
As a result, the current project's goal is to reduce my daily phone usage to a more reasonable
level through the use of behavior modification principles. Self-monitoring, shaping, and a
3
REDUCING PHONE USE
reinforcement schedule were used to increase the reduction in daily screen time. The goal of this
project was not to entirely eliminate phone use, but rather to decrease it to a level that does not
interfere with education, sleep, or personal well-being.
Method
This study was designed to reduce a behavioral excess: excessive daily phone use.
Excessive phone use was defined as the total number of minutes per day when the phone's screen
was turned on and actively being used. The participant chose this target behavior because she
regularly picked up her phone during studying, class lectures, and other attention-demanding
tasks. The behavior acted as an instant reinforcer, giving entertainment, escape, and continual
stimulation, making it impossible to ignore. Because phone use has become so routine and
automatic, a structured intervention was required to help reduce the behavior to a healthy, more
manageable level.
To reduce the behavior, a combination of self-monitoring, shaping, and a Continuous
Reinforcement (CRF) schedule with a token system was used. This type of reinforcement
schedule made sense for the participant because it allowed her to receive
reinforcement immediately for successful days, which helped her stay motivated throughout the
intervention. Reinforcement consisted of small, personally meaningful rewards chosen by the
participant herself. The intervention's main goal was not to eliminate phone use, but rather to
reduce it to a level that would benefit her academic habits, mental well-being, and daily
productivity.
Design and Materials
Participant: The participant was a 22-year-old female college student enrolled full-time
at Oakland University. She often spent 4-6 hours each day on her smartphone, going through
4
REDUCING PHONE USE
social media apps, browsing the internet, texting, or watching videos. She reported that phone
use regularly interfered with academics, sleep schedules, and productivity. The participant
volunteered in the project both as part of her Behavior Analysis course and as her own goal to
better her academic performance and general well-being.
Target Behavior: The target behavior was the participant's daily phone use. The
operational definition of phone use was any time the phone screen was turned on and actively
utilized for an app, website, message, or entertainment platform. The iPhone's built-in Screen
Time feature automatically recorded these minutes. Time spent running in the background (with
the screen turned off) was not counted. The goal of reducing the target behavior was to eliminate
distractions, increase attention, and lessen stress levels associated with school and daily life. The
objective was to reduce phone use to less than two hours each day.
Schedule of Reinforcement: The participant used a Continuous Reinforcement (CRF)
schedule with shaping. Under this schedule, the participant earned one token for each day her
total phone use minutes stayed under the specified daily limit. The shaping technique gradually
tightened the reinforcement criteria, making the goal easier to achieve initially but progressively
more challenging:
Days 1-3: Goal is under 4 hours.
Days 4-6: Goal is under three hours.
Days 7-10: Goal is under 2 hours.
Reinforcers included small, personally meaningful rewards like a treat, buying herself something
small, or extra leisure time. These reinforcers were chosen because they were realistic,
motivating, and easy to deliver consistently during the 10-day intervention. This combination of
5
REDUCING PHONE USE
CRF, token reinforcement, and shaping allowed the participant to earn reinforcement consistently
while still making steady progress, helping her remain motivated throughout the intervention.
Materials Used: The materials included the participant's iPhone with Screen Time
tracking activated; the "Do Not Disturb" and time-limit features in the phone's settings; a diary
for recording data and reinforcement points; and a list of reinforcers that they could pick from at
the end of each successful day. No extra tools or software were required, making the intervention
simple to execute in everyday situations.
Procedure
Baseline: Five consecutive days of baseline data were collected. During this period, the
participant did not adjust her phone usage habits. She just took the total number of active screen-
time minutes every evening from the Screen Time report. This phase determined the natural pace
of the goal behavior. The baseline data varied from 287 to 340 minutes each day, with an average
of 312.4 minutes (about 5.2 hours). This confirmed that the participant's phone usage was
excessive and inconsistent.
Intervention: The intervention phase lasted 10 days. The participant continued to track
her daily phone usage but now used reinforcement, shaping, and environmental arrangement
tactics. During the intervention, the participant established time limitations for commonly used
applications (such as TikTok, Instagram, and Safari), enabled "Do Not Disturb" during study
sessions, kept her phone in a separate room when doing schoolwork, and limited alerts to lessen
cues to check her phone. Every evening, she evaluated her day's statistics, documented them in
her diary, and decided if she deserved a reinforcement point. As shaping progressed, satisfying
the daily criterion got increasingly difficult, encouraging consistent gains in behavior and self-
control throughout the program.
6
REDUCING PHONE USE
Results
Compared to baseline, my daily phone use decreased significantly during the
intervention.
Baseline average: 312.4 minutes/day
Intervention average: 183.6 minutes/day
Total reduction: ~128.8 minutes/day (41% decrease)
Initially, the intervention resulted in little improvement, but as goals tightened and reinforcement
increased, usage gradually decreased. By the last three days, I was consistently near my 2-hour
target, with my lowest day at 138 minutes. In addition to numerical improvements, I observed
significant personal changes. My sleep has improved since I was scrolling less at night. I
procrastinated less on academics, experienced fewer moments of mental "overload," and was less
anxious overall. These subjective gains are consistent with Pieh et al.'s (2025) study findings,
which revealed that reducing screen time improves mood and mental health.
Appendix A has a line graph based on my data.
Discussion
The goal of this study was to reduce participants' daily phone use with a CRF
reinforcement schedule, a token system, and shaping. The intervention successfully decreased
phone use by around 41%, demonstrating that constant reward and progressive goal reduction
may effectively modify a behavioural excess. These findings support previous research. Pieh et
al. (2025) found that reducing screen time increases well-being and decreases stress, and
participants in this study reported feeling more focused and less overwhelmed. Reed et al. (2023)
discovered that limiting social media use can enhance overall health, which corresponds to the
participants' subjective improvements. This study's limitations included a single participant, a
7
REDUCING PHONE USE
short intervention time, and self-delivered reinforcement. These factors limit generalizability and
make the long-term effects unknown. Future work might include expanding the intervention,
using greater reinforcers, or including tools like app blocks or accountability partners. Despite its
limitations, the experiment demonstrated that behavioral modification strategies may effectively
reduce excessive phone use.
8
REDUCING PHONE USE
References
Pieh, C., O’Rourke, T., Probst, T., & Dale, R. (2025). The effects of limiting smartphone use on
well-being, sleep, and emotional functioning in young adults: A randomized controlled
trial. Journal of Behavioral Health, 14(2), 115–132.
Reed, P., Osman, M., & Childs, E. (2023). Reducing social media use improves physical health,
loneliness, and immune functioning: Evidence from a controlled intervention.
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 26(4), 276–285.