Briefing on the Economic History of
Indian Agriculture, 1857-1947
Executive Summary
This document synthesizes the economic history of agriculture in India from 1857 to 1947,
based on the analysis of Tirthankar Roy. While agriculture was the primary source of
livelihood for over two-thirds of the population, its overall growth was unimpressive, rarely
exceeding 1% per year before World War I and becoming disastrously low during the
interwar period. This slow growth was marked by significant and lasting regional inequality,
with areas that prospered during the colonial era often being the same ones that
experienced the post-Independence Green Revolution.
The period from 1860 to 1925 was characterized by the commercialization of agriculture,
driven by global demand, new infrastructure like railways and canals, and a declining real tax
burden. This led to a notable divergence in performance between commercial
(non-foodgrain) crops, which saw output growth, and subsistence (foodgrain) crops, which
stagnated. Regional experiences varied dramatically: Punjab, with its extensive canal
colonies, became a "showpiece" of development, while Bengal suffered from population
pressure, land degradation, and declining output.
Commercialization triggered significant changes in factor markets for land, labor, and credit.
While a land market emerged, it remained sluggish due to legal ambiguities and weak
incentives. The labor market saw an increase in wage and migrant labor, but long-term real
wages for agricultural laborers remained largely stagnant, defining the persistence of
poverty. The credit market expanded, but was increasingly dominated by a rising class of
rich and middle peasants rather than a distinct moneylender class.
Contrary to theories of widespread peasant dispossession, the evidence suggests that
inequality in landholdings did not increase. Instead, the period saw the consolidation and
economic strengthening of a "middle peasantry," which reaped the benefits of
commercialization. The primary explanation for India's overall agricultural stagnation lies not
in colonial exploitation or class structure, but in fundamental resource endowments. In
high-rainfall eastern India, high population density and land fragmentation constrained
growth, while in the vast dry lands of the Deccan, the prohibitively high cost and risk of
securing water were the overwhelming constraints on productivity.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Trends in Agricultural Production and Income
Analysis of agricultural output during the colonial period reveals a pattern of slow, uneven
growth, followed by stagnation, particularly in the critical foodgrain sector.
A. The Nineteenth Century (Post-1858)
Fragmentary data from the second half of the nineteenth century indicates two primary
patterns:
1. Expansion of Cultivated Area: A significant expansion in the net sown area
occurred in major regions, a phenomenon confirmed by land-use statistics. This
growth was most pronounced for widely traded commercial crops. The availability of
cultivable wastes and the development of canal irrigation, which made previously
uncultivable land arable, were key drivers.
2. Moderate Yield Increase in Commercial Crops: Specific commercial crops, notably
cotton and wheat, showed evidence of a moderate rise in yield per acre.
Growth in this period was overwhelmingly driven by bringing more land under cultivation
rather than by significant improvements in productivity per acre.
B. Agricultural Production, 1890–1947
George Blyn's reconstruction of agricultural statistics for this period provides a more detailed
picture, highlighting seven key findings:
1. Slow Overall Growth: The average growth rate of all crop output was a mere 0.37%
per year.
2. Food vs. Non-Food Disparity: Foodgrain output was stagnant (0.11% growth),
while non-foodgrain (commercial crop) output grew at a much healthier rate of
1.31%.
3. Sources of Slow Growth: The low overall output growth was a result of both
minimal acreage growth (0.40%) and slow yield growth (0.01%), with yields for food
crops actually declining.
4. Interwar Decline: Yields for both food and non-food crops grew until World War I.
However, in the interwar period, food crop yields experienced a marked decline.
5. Stagnation in Rice: Among food crops, the primary source of stagnation was rice,
which saw an output decline of -0.09%. Wheat, by contrast, continued to grow
(0.84%).
6. Regional Disparities: Regional experiences varied significantly. Greater Bengal
suffered a severe decline, with below-average growth in output and yield for both
food and non-food crops. In contrast, Greater Punjab experienced robust growth of
1.57% in all crop output.
7. Declining Per Capita Food Availability: Until World War I, food output grew faster
than population. This trend reversed in the interwar period (1921-46), as population
growth (1.12% annually) accelerated while food output growth decelerated (0.13%),
leading to a fall in food availability per head. This was especially acute in Bengal.
Growth Rates of Net Domestic Product (NDP), 1868-1947 (% Annual)
Period Agriculture NDP Total NDP Population Per Capita NDP
1868–98 1.01 0.99 0.40 0.59
1900–46 0.31 0.86 0.87 -0.01
Trend Growth Rates of Crop Output, 1891–1946 (% Annual)
Crop Category Output Acreage Yield per Acre
All crops 0.37 0.40 0.01
Foodgrains 0.11 0.31 -0.18
Non-foodgrains 1.31 0.42 0.67
II. Resources and Agricultural Techniques
The fundamental constraints and modest technological changes in Indian agriculture were
central to its performance.
A. Soil and Fertility
● Soil Types: India's agricultural conditions were dictated by four main soil types: the
generally nitrogen-deficient 'red' soil of peninsular India; the fertile black cotton soil
(regur) of the Deccan; the deep alluvium of the Indo-Gangetic plains; and the less
conducive laterite soils of the Ghats and central India.
● Declining Fertility Debate: In the interwar period, economists like Radhakamal
Mukherjee argued that soil fertility was declining due to problems like waterlogging
and erosion, exacerbated by deforestation and canal irrigation. The Royal
Commission on Agriculture (1928), however, found no definitive evidence of declining
returns, concluding instead that yields were maintained at a "low but stable level of
fertility."
● The 'Manurial Problem': Experts identified a key issue in the low intensity of manure
usage compared to regions like East Asia. The export of nitrogen-rich materials
(oilseeds, animal hides), the use of cow dung as fuel, and the rarity of using green
manure or night soil prevented the restoration of nitrogen to the soil, creating a
low-level equilibrium.
B. Water and Irrigation
Water availability was a crucial differentiator between rural poverty and prosperity.
● Expansion of Irrigation: The percentage of cropped area under irrigation increased
from 12.4% in 1885 to 22.1% in 1938. This expansion occurred mainly through
government canals and private wells.
● Regional Concentration: Irrigation, both canals and wells, was concentrated in four
regions: Punjab, deltaic Madras, western UP, and Sind. This was due to favorable
geography (snow-fed rivers, alluvial soil) and the complementary nature of the two
systems; canals encouraged cropping pattern changes that stimulated private
investment in wells.
● The Importance of Wells: Constructing a private well was a critical investment for a
farmer. Favorable conditions in western UP, with a high water table and firm subsoil,
made well construction cheap and common. In contrast, in regions like Bundelkhand
and the Deccan plateau, deep rock formations made wells prohibitively expensive
(costing up to 400 times more), severely limiting agricultural potential.
C. Equipment, Seeds, and Livestock
● Equipment: The basic set of agricultural implements changed little, though there
was a gradual shift toward using more iron. Efforts by agricultural scientists to
promote heavy iron ploughs for dry areas saw limited success outside of Punjab due
to "missing markets" for new equipment and seeds.
● Seeds: Government agricultural research stations, especially at Pusa, successfully
identified and developed superior wheat strains from indigenous varieties, which
became popular.
● Livestock: The use of animal power (primarily bullocks) was inefficient compared to
other agrarian societies. India used 67 heads of cattle per 100 acres, compared to 25
in Egypt. Experts attributed this to the underuse of sturdier buffaloes and the poor
quality of Indian bullocks, a problem linked to an oversupply of cattle against
insufficient fodder.
III. The Commercialization of Agriculture
The period from 1860 to 1925 witnessed a significant shift towards production for sale in
distant markets, a process that marked a quantitative and qualitative break from the
pre-colonial era.
A. Drivers of Commercialization
● Demand-Side Factors:
○ Industrialization in Europe stimulated massive demand for food and raw
materials.
○ Technological advances like steam ships and the opening of the Suez Canal
(1869) reduced transport costs and time between Europe and India.
○ The development of railways integrated local and regional markets,
connecting areas of supply and demand within India.
● Supply-Side Factors:
○ The real burden of land taxes, fixed in money, progressively lightened as
agricultural prices rose, increasing the profit motive.
○ Railways dramatically lowered the cost for farmers and merchants to access
ports.
○ Large-scale canal irrigation made wastelands cultivable and increased
cropping intensity.
B. Key Commercial Crops
● Early Wave (Declining after 1860):
○ Indigo: Shifted from Bengal to Bihar and UP before declining due to the
discovery of mineral dyes.
○ Opium: Remained a lucrative trade and a major source of government
revenue (16-17% between 1850-1880) before declining due to rising rice
prices, Chinese efforts to reduce consumption, and international pressure.
● Later Wave (Post-1850s):
○ Cotton: The American Civil War (1861) created a "Cotton Famine," turning
India into a major supplier for Lancashire mills. Demand was sustained by the
growth of mills in Bombay and exports to Japan. Key growing regions
included Khandesh, south Gujarat, the Deccan, and Punjab.
○ Wheat: Exports to Europe grew rapidly from the 1870s, driven by falling
transport costs. Punjab, UP, and the Bombay-Deccan were the primary
exporting regions.
○ Rice: Bengal, Burma, and Southeast Asia became the world's main sources
of rice. Bengal rice was exported to other Indian provinces and colonies, while
Burma rice went to Europe.
○ Sugarcane: While facing competition from beet sugar in global markets, the
domestic market for traditional sweeteners (gur and khand) grew, stimulated
by the introduction of more efficient two-roller crusher mills. UP, Punjab, Bihar,
and Bengal were the main cultivation areas.
IV. Regional Experiences in Agrarian Change
The impact of commercialization was highly variable, creating distinct regional trajectories of
development and stagnation.
● Punjab: Considered a "showpiece" by British administrators. The construction of a
massive canal system created nine "canal colonies," turning vast arid wastes into
fertile arable land. This led to a huge expansion in cultivated area, a shift to
high-value crops like wheat and cotton, and the rise of new market towns.
● The Upper Doab (Western UP): A dense network of canals encouraged the
cultivation of water-intensive cash crops like sugarcane and wheat. A regional
specialization emerged, with the Doab focusing on these crops while peripheral
areas shifted to other grains and oilseeds.
● The Deccan Plateau: A dry, millet-growing region where the railways were the key
catalyst, connecting the black soil cotton-growing zones to the port of Bombay.
Acreage expansion was limited due to the high cost of irrigation, but there were
significant shifts in crop composition toward cotton and oilseeds.
● Eastern India (Bengal): The historical narrative is largely pessimistic. Despite
access to railways and demand from Calcutta's jute mills, the region remained
paddy-based. High population density led to pressure on land, fragmentation of
holdings, and a view that the peasantry was progressively impoverished. Rice yields
and overall output declined in the interwar period.
● Coastal Andhra & Tamil Nadu: Canal irrigation in the Godavari-Krishna and
Cauvery deltas stimulated paddy cultivation and diversification into crops like tobacco
and oilseeds. In the drier districts of Tamil Nadu, the growth of cotton and groundnut
exports, coupled with rising profits, encouraged significant private investment in
irrigation wells, laying the groundwork for future growth.
● Central India: The railways were the key driver, linking the wheat-growing Narmada
Valley and the cotton-growing regions of Berar to major ports. Berar became a major
destination for migrant farm laborers from Chhattisgarh.
● Sind: Already having a high proportion of irrigated land, the region saw further
expansion of its canal network. Net sown area more than doubled between 1885 and
1925, with wheat and cotton growing in relative importance due to export markets.
V. Development of Factor Markets and Social Effects
Commercialization induced profound changes in the markets for land, labor, and credit,
reshaping the rural economy and social structure.
A. Land, Tenancy, and Labor
● Land Market: The establishment of private property rights theoretically made land
marketable. However, the market remained sluggish due to the embedding of
individual ownership within the rights of the extended family, creating legal ambiguity
and high transaction costs. After 1900, as land became scarce, prices began to rise
sharply, outpacing agricultural prices.
● Tenancy: The scale of tenancy increased. A series of tenancy acts strengthened the
rights of long-settled "occupancy tenants," but this often encouraged subleasing
("subinfeudation"), leaving a large number of leases unregulated. Rents rose in
prosperous regions from the late 19th century onward.
● Labor Market: The period saw an increase in wage labor and migration. The decline
of older, caste-based systems of attached labor led to a rise in casual wage-labor
markets, increasing the participation of women. Large streams of seasonal migrants
moved from poorer regions to work in the expanding cash-crop zones. Despite this
increased mobility, real wages for agricultural laborers remained largely stagnant
over the long run, with a catastrophic fall during World War II.
Wage Laborers in Agricultural Workforce (%)
Year Men Women Total
1901 14.3 30.2 19.5
1931 19.5 43.8 36.3
B. Credit Market
● Expansion: Commercialization increased the demand for credit to finance inputs for
cash crops and to bridge gaps between harvests and tax payments. The supply of
credit grew as property rights enhanced the mortgage value of land.
● The Role of the Moneylender: The relationship between debtor and creditor
became a source of official concern, particularly after the anti-moneylender "Deccan
Riots" of 1875. This led to legislation like the Punjab Land Alienation Act (1900) to
restrain land transfers.
● Shift in Creditors: Despite fears of a professional moneylender class taking over
peasant land, this occurred on a limited scale. Over time, rural credit came to be
dominated by rich and middle peasants, who were also landowners and cultivators.
Credit, commerce, and growth were often positively correlated.
C. Class Structure and Standard of Living
● Consolidation of the Middle Peasantry: Evidence does not support a thesis of
increasing polarization or the disappearance of the middle peasantry. Instead,
commercialization strengthened farmers from peasant stock with secure rights over
sufficiently large plots. These groups (e.g., Jats in Punjab, Patidars in Gujarat,
Vellalas in Tamil Nadu) grew richer, became less dependent on moneylenders, and
consolidated their economic and social power, forming the class later known as
"bullock capitalists."
● Limited Mobility for Small Peasants: Small peasants, constrained by small
holdings, insecure tenancy, and limited capital, found upward mobility difficult,
especially in the 20th century.
● Famines: The argument that foodgrain exports intensified famines is challenged.
Evidence suggests that infrastructure like railways and market integration had a
mitigating effect by allowing for easier movement of food from surplus to deficit areas.
Famines due to harvest failure became rare after 1900.
VI. Explaining Agricultural Stagnation
Two primary schools of thought attempt to explain the slow overall growth of Indian
agriculture.
A. The Class and Power Thesis
This influential argument posits that colonial policies and "forced commercialization" left
peasants indebted to a powerful moneylender class. This class, it is argued, was reluctant to
invest in land improvement because it profited more from usury and crop shares from
indebted tenants (the "Bhaduri model"). However, the source material largely refutes this by
arguing:
● Commercialization was largely a voluntary response to price signals.
● The real tax burden fell, strengthening the profit motive.
● The credit business was increasingly dominated by rich peasants who did invest in
productivity, particularly in cash crops.
● There is no evidence of extensive land transfers from peasants to a non-agricultural
moneylender class.
B. The Resource Endowment Thesis
This explanation, favored in the source text, identifies environmental conditions as the
fundamental constraint on growth. It highlights a critical divergence between two types of
regions:
● High-Rainfall, High-Density Regions (e.g., Eastern India): In these rice-growing
areas, high population density led to the fragmentation of holdings and the cultivation
of inferior land. Income was shared among too many people, and land degradation
made investment in improvements expensive and uncertain.
● Low-Rainfall Dry Lands (e.g., Deccan Plateau): Here, the primary constraint was
the overwhelmingly high cost and risk of securing water. Sinking wells was
prohibitively expensive due to low water tables and hard rock formations, making
investment in land improvement unprofitable for most.
The overall stagnation in the interwar period is attributed to the fact that the earlier growth,
driven by the expansion of land and water, had reached its limits. When the supply of new
land slowed, output growth decelerated, awaiting the technological breakthroughs of a later
era.