Polymer Injection for Enhanced Oil Recovery
Polymer Injection for Enhanced Oil Recovery
Summary
Introduction
Chapter [Link] injection in enhanced recovery
Description of the polymer injection process
Factors that favor polymer injection
Unfavorable factors considered for the process:
Procedure for enhanced recovery with polymer drainage
Factors that control polymer injection recovery
Geometry of the deposit
Types of injection
Peripheral or external injection
Injection in arrayso dispersa
Porosity
Permeability
Depth and temperature
Initial water saturation
Water salinity
Spacing between wells
Optimal time for the start of the injection process of polymers
Properties that a well must have for polymer injection
Main parameters that characterize well arrangements
CHAPTERII Field experience in injectione ppolymers
General situation
Characteristics of the deposit
Project development
Results
Chapter III:
Properties and characteristics of polymers in the environmento pgolden
Polymer retention
Pore volume (PV)
Reduction of permeability
Injectability characteristics of polymers in RMH processes
Heterogeneous deposits
Characteristics of fluids
Ventajas y desventajas de la inyeccion de polimeros
Types of polymers used in recoveryn mimproved
Polyacrylamides
Polysaccharides
Common problems in injection de poligomers
Conclusions
Bibliographic references
SUMMARY
It includes information regarding the application of polymers in a reservoir, taking into account
account for important factors of it in order to proceed with a polymer injection and with
the purpose of successful recovery; it also describes what relates to the process of
injection of polymers into the well.
The characteristics that the polymer must meet for selection are mentioned.
of polymers in order to maximize production and minimize volume cost
of chemicals injected into the reservoir; also, verify the conditions of the crude oil that
remains at the site to determine if it is correct to apply a drainage of
chemicals.
.
INTRODUCTION
There is currently a great need to recover the crude oil that exists in the
declining wells, as this represents 60 to 80% of the total crude that arrives at
to produce a well, that is to say, it is necessary to extract that last part of hydrocarbon
contained in these and that cannot be achieved with conventional methods, in addition to
which makes it very difficult and uneconomical to extract it, for this reason there are options for
recovery calls enhanced or assisted, which is a great challenge for the
companies that are in charge of crude extraction implement new methods of
recovery, one of these is recovery through the immiscible drainage of
polymers and surfactants, so assisted recovery is of paramount importance
importance in working with the well to make the most of performance
economic of the same.
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
Extensive fractures.
Strong push of water.
Cover ofgas.
High permeability contrast.
Highly saline formation water.
Front
It is the area that corresponds to the initial state of the deposit after drainage with
water. The oil saturation is typically 30%, just a little above saturation.
of used oil in English (SOR). It can be said that the oil is found
in the form of disconnected globules trapped in the pores by capillary forces.
This area indicates the part of the oil bank, referring to a state in which both
Fluids exhibit continuity. In this area, a two-phase flow occurs.
Types of injection
According to the position of the injection and production wells, the water injection
it can be carried out in two different ways:
It consists of injecting water outside the oil zone, on the flanks of the reservoir. It
also known as traditional injection and in this case, water is injected into the
aquifer near the water-oil contact.
Injection in arrays or sparse
It consists of injecting water into the oil zone. The water invades this area and
it displaces the fluids from the invaded volume towards the production wells. This type of
injection is also known as internal water injection, as the fluid is injected
in the oil zone through a considerable number of injection wells that form
a geometric arrangement with the producing wells as shown below in the
Porosity
The initial water saturation is the amount of water that exists in the reservoir when
moment of its discovery, it is considered as the amount of remaining water
which was initially deposited in the formation and which, due to the forces of pressure
existing capillaries, I cannot move with the hydrocarbons when they migrated to the
reservoir. When water is injected into a reservoir, the water that is present
Originally in the well varies in terms of its composition.
Water salinity
The salinity of the brine from the deposit can have a favorable or unfavorable effect.
in some polymers, this depends on the total salt concentration, taking into account
the monovalence or divalence of this and the concentration of the polymer used.
The sample shows the behavior of salt concentration in ppm vs viscosity of the
polymeric solution, this relationship is inversely proportional, in addition two are shown
commercial polyacrylamides PAPH-500 and PAPH-700, it is observed that the latter is better.
PAPH-700 as it supports higher salt concentrations unlike the PAPH-
500.
The start of the polymer injection process, in the same way as in injection
of water, is a function of different variables of the deposits, among which are
they find the following:
the initial pressure.
the mechanisms of production.
the presence and size of aquifers and/or gas cap.
and the properties of fluids, in particular, bubble pressure.
Mobility controls the relative ease with which fluids can flow in a medium.
porous. Given that the relative permeabilities to oil and water are a function of
saturation, the mobilities also depend on saturation.
The mobility ratio is the quotient of the mobility of the displacing fluid (water) and the
mobility of the displaced fluid (oil).
If M < 1: The displacement is favorable.
If M > 1: The displacement is unfavorable.
MAIN PARAMETERS THAT CHARACTERIZE WELL ARRANGEMENTS
d: it is the shortest distance between lines of wells of different types, located one to
continuation of the other in the same column.
the shortest distance between wells of the same type found in the same row,
one after the other.
It is the smallest portion of the array that represents it. It is also known as an element of
symmetry of the arrangement and must include at least one injector well and one producer. All the
Studies are being conducted on this element.
CHAPTER II
EXPERIENCE IN POLYMER INJECTION FIELD
Results of two pilot injection tests in the central area of the Daqing field in the
Heilongjiang province, China.
Location of the Daqing field, China
provide some technical and practical experiences to expand this technique towards
other areas of the Daqing Field.
Daqing is one of the largest sandstone fields in the world, and has 52
oil and gas wells covering an area of 6,000 square kilometers.
General situation
The selection of the polymers in the pilot tests consisted of a pilot test 1
In the East with a single layer in the Putaoahua formation and a pilot test 2 (PP2)
in the West area with two layers, Saertu formation. The distance between these 2 areas was
approximately 150m. Each piloting consisted of 4 inverted '5 spots', as well as
2 observation wells for sampling. The area of each pilot test was
approximately 90m. 2
In the classic "five spot" with the injector well at the center as indicated in the gradient of
pressure is exerted directly between the injection well and each production well and, therefore,
thus, it varies considerably from one point to another of the deposit.
All these factors mean that the multiphase flow cannot be considered of type
piston at the scale of the deposit and that the sweep efficiency can be notably
reduced by the existence of preferential pathways.
Arrangement "five spots", layout of 1 injector well in the center and 4 producing wells
around
Characteristics of the deposit
The formations are channels of sandstones with thickness layers of 2.3 to 11.6 meters with
promedio de 6.1m y 11.6 a 19.2m con promedio en 15m. Promedio de permeabilidad de
1100 milliDarcy (Saertu formation) and 1400 mD in the PP1 area and coefficient of
permeability of 0.5 and 0.7 mD (Saertu formation) and interval of 0.6 to 0.8 mD (formation
Temperatures of 43°C for both formations. Viscosities of
9.5 cp. Salinity around 7,000 ppm for formation water and from 800 to 1,300.
ppm for injected water and from 2,000 to 4,000 for produced water.
The formations that contain hydrocarbons consist of several sandy layers and
Many times these layers are defined in the deposit as geological units.
independent; and are characterized by variations in porosity, permeability and
fluid saturation. The criterion for defining a productive net thickness is sometimes
arbitrary.
Project development
A proposal for water injection prior to the polymer injection process was
carried out with the purpose of:
1) The communication between the injectors and producers and the productivity of the
producers can be obtained to provide a basis for the project design
of polymer injection.
2) Decrease the salinity of the formation water so that a high value of
the viscosity of the polymer solution is maintained in the reservoir.
For its part, the polymer used in the pilot tests was a powder of polyacrylamide.
partially hydrolyzed with a molecular weight of 10 million. The polymer solution
it has good viscosity and injectability. These activities began in 1990 and
they finished in 1992.
Pilot One.- The injection of polymer solution began on August 5, 1990, and ended
On February 20, 1992. The cumulative injection of polymer solution was 213,019.
m3 is equal to 66.7% of the pore volume in the pilot unit. The average rate of the
3 in each well. The amount of polymer solution injected
the injection was 100 m/d
It was 504 ppm •VP.
Pilot Two.- The injection of polymer solution began on November 7, 1990 and
it ended on February 24, 1992. The accumulated injection was 335,225 m and 3equal to
57.6% of the pore volume. The average injection rate was 200 m/d of each 3
well, because there were two oil fields. The amount of polymer solution
injected was 491 ppm •VP.
Before the polymer injection, 1,000 ppm of formaldehyde solution was injected.
each well per day according to the water injection rate. In the injection process of
polymers, 100 ppm of formaldehyde solution and 150 ppm of a chelating agent
added to the polymer solution in order to increase the stability of the solution and
maintain its high viscosity.
The chelating agents are used to treat or remove deposits or thickening agents in
drilling fluids of reservoirs. During acid treatments or removal of
inclusions, different compounds can be dissolved in the treatment fluid. A
as the acid reacts and the pH increases, products can precipitate out.
reaction as an insoluble gelatinous mass. If this occurs within the matrix of
formation, it is almost impossible to remove and can cause permeability damage
permanent. Chelating agents prevent precipitation by keeping the ions in
soluble form until the treatment fluid can flow back from the
formation during cleaning. Typical chelating agents for the oil field
includes EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), HEDTA (hydroxyethyl ethylenediamine)
triacetic), NTA (nitrilotriacetic acid) and citric acid.
Results
The polymer injection increased the injection pressure and adjusted the profiles of
injection.
The polymer injection significantly reduced water cut and
oil production increased in the producing wells. The production of
The accumulated oil from the 'Pilot Unit One' was 119,556 tons.
the increase in oil production due to polymer injection was
59,767 tons and 209 tons of crude oil per ton of polymer
injected.
The polymer injection reduced water consumption, increased the coefficient of
water usage and accelerated the oil production rate. For each ton
of crude oil produced, the amount of water injected was 29.5 m and 3
Polymer retention
When a polymer flows through the pores of the rock, the amount of
retained polymer. However, this is not entirely true, as small amounts of
polymer can be removed from the porous medium. Retention causes loss of
polymer of the solution, which may cause the efficiency in the control of the
reduced mobility.
Polymer molecules are larger than water molecules and are more
larger than some pores in the porous medium. Because of this, the polymers do not flow to
throughout the porous space in contact with the brine.
Reduction of permeability
Polymers reduce the apparent permeability of the rock. The reduction of the
permeability depends on the type of polymer, the amount of polymer retained, the
distribution of pore size and the average size of the polymer in relation to the
pores of the rock.
If the reservoir is heterogeneous, the properties of the reservoir vary depending on the
spatial localization. These properties can include permeability, porosity, thickness,
saturation, failures, fractures, among others. For an appropriate description of a
deposit, it is necessary to predict the variation of these properties as a function of
spatial locations.
CHARACTERISTICS OF FLUIDS
ADVANTAGES
They improve the vertical sweep.
Polymers are classified in various ways, which generally depend on their use.
they want to give them, either by their origin, composition or application; those that are used in
The oil industry for enhanced recovery processes can be classified into two.
groups: polyacrylamides and polysaccharides (biopolymers).
Polyacrylamides
Polysaccharides
Polysaccharides are polymers found in nature and it is said that they are the
most abundant organic matter. The most important are starch and cellulose, which
supplies the material of the cell walls.
In chemical injection processes, the most commonly used is hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC)
and xanthan gum.
COMMON PROBLEMS IN POLYMER INJECTION:
When a polymer injection is performed, there are various problems during the
development stage largely depending on the type of polymer that will be used for the
injection.
Most of these problems can be solved by injecting additives into the solution.
polymeric or also through the injection monitoring, however, if these
problems not detected in time can lead to a serious failure problem in the
oil recovery.
CONCLUSIONS
The study concludes that the best polymer to be used in enhanced recovery is the
Partially Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide (PAPH), because at low concentrations, of the order
From 500 to 1500 ppm the yield is great; because the viscosity of water increases.
quickly. It is also used for its low costs, compared to Hydroxyethylcellulose whose
Prices are high and large concentrations are also required to make water viscous.
Most studies for the application of polymer injection worldwide have been conducted
in sandstone deposits, but nationally the majority of these are characterized by having a
matrix of naturally fractured carbonates which poses a challenge for the study of the
feasibility of performing a polymer and surfactant injection to avoid a poor injection
effective from the polymeric solution in addition to mechanical degradation, so it must be carried out
a detailed study of the well fractures and to verify if they do not cover a very extensive area of the
deposit.
If the injection of polymers is carried out without taking into account the fractures of the reservoir, one runs the risk
the risk that production will decline in a very short time, caused by the loss of the
Polymeric solution in the fractures of the reservoir generating high costs due to its loss.
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES
1) [Link]
2)[Link]
3) [Link]
4)[Link]
5)[Link]
6)[Link]
[Link]
7)[Link]
8)[Link]
a%20de%20Petroleum%20Deposits%20-%20Jose%[Link]
9)[Link]
[Link]
10) [Link]
[Link]
11)[Link]
[Link]
12)[Link] ENGINEERING FOR
NON-PETROLEUM/Presentations/Fundamentals of Exploration
y Production of [Link]
13) [Link]
14)[Link]
Enhanced Hydrocarbon Recovery Page 27