Strategic Project Management Guide
Strategic Project Management Guide
Code: 708200023
Class: E/2
Classification
Categories Indicators Standards Note
Punctuation
do Subtotal
maximum
tutor
Index 0.5
Introduction 0.5
Aspects
Structure Discussion 0.5
organizational
Conclusion 0.5
Bibliography 0.5
Contextualization
(Clear indication of 1.0
problem)
Introduction Description two
1.0
objectives
Appropriate methodology
2.0
to the object of the work
Articulation and dominance
of academic discourse
Content expression writing 2.0
care, coherence
Analysis textual cohesion
discussion Literature review
national and international
2.0
relevant in the area of
study
Data exploration 2.0
Contributions theoretical
Conclusion 2.0
practical
Pagination, type e
Aspects size of lyrics
Formatting 1.0
general paragraph, spacing
between the lines
APA Standards
Rigour and coherence of
References 6th edition in
citations/references 4.0
Bibliographic quotes e
bibliographic
bibliography
Index
1. Introductiono ................................................................................................................................ 4
2. Projecto.................................................................................................................................... 5
3. Conclusion 9
3
1. Introduction
Planning takes place right after the decision-making, aiming at the search for solutions.
for a certain reality, for what the necessary actions will be ordered then. "These
decisions are explained, systematized, interpreted, and detailed in documents that
represent rising degrees of decision-making levels: plans, programs, and projects." The Work
the objective is to provide a detailed analysis around the theme, thus talking about the
The methodologies used for the execution of the work were those of bibliographic review, and during the
During the execution of the work, some not very important difficulties were encountered, which is the
scarcity of information as it is a more talked about theme nowadays, scarcity of information is
solid.
4
2. Project
According to Tumam (1983) cited by Rabecheri, Carvalho, and Laurindo (2002), a complete definition and
However, in the context of project management, Patah and Carvalho (2012) emphasize that projects
can be defined as organizations that arise in the midst of routine and are 'forgettable',
integrating individuals who possibly will not work together again.
According to Armani (2004), projects do not happen in isolation; they are part of a
decision-making process that encompasses three levels of formulation: the level of the great
objectives and strategic axes of action, the policy (which in our study we will address as
plans); the intermediate level at which plans are translated into main lines of action
themes, the programs; finally, the level of concrete actions, marked in time and space,
the projects.
According to Baptista (2002), planning occurs right after the decision-making process.
as a target the search for solutions to a certain reality, to which they will be organized.
actions then necessary. "These decisions are clarified, systematized, interpreted and
detailed in documents that represent increasing degrees of decision-making levels: plans,
programs and projects.
For a project to be effective in its development, one must consider its entire cycle
life, contemplating all stages, from beginning, middle and end. In this sense, all
Methodology that addresses project management considers phases or stages within its scope.
for its implementation. The PMBoK, among its contents, addresses the phases that comprise the
project life cycle, composed of management areas, which will be discussed in the
next sections of this chapter.
5
2.1.1. The Phases of Project Management
The phases that make up a project, according to PMBoK, are five, namely Initiation,
Planning, Execution, Control and Closure.
[Link].Initiation
The project, as the name itself suggests, begins by identifying the needs of
company, the viability of the project, because not every project is viable to be developed, the
formation of the team that will work on the project and the proposal that the hired company of
management will do.
[Link]. Planning
This phase begins still within the initiation phase. In it, all information is collected.
necessary to define and improve the project's objectives, in addition to developing a plan for
action to achieve these objectives.
[Link]. Execution
In this phase, the plans made in the previous phase will be put into practice, people
resources and expectations will be focused in order to execute the activities of
project in accordance with the project management plan.
This phase aims to analyze the progress of the project. It consists of analyzing, monitoring and
organize the development and performance of the project. Identify if there will be changes and in
which areas will be, and thus, put them into practice.
[Link]. Closure
After the execution of these four phases, the final phase of the project begins. At this moment, it is
expected to finish all activities aiming to formally conclude the project. Thus, when
completed is verified if all phases are complete and have been successful.
6
For Baptista, (1981). After the context analysis, the next step will be to prepare the
project objectives. It is not easy to formulate objectives, but their elaboration and delimitation, their
clarity and legitimacy are fundamental for the success of any project, since it will depend on
Two objectives outlined that all actions will be planned, executed, and evaluated. It is necessary
that they are well understood by everyone: project team, partners, and beneficiaries of
action, enabling a common language and understanding of what is being proposed and
of desired results.
Acceptability - it must be acceptable to the people whose actions are involved in the
its execution.
Enforceability – it must be enforceable within a reasonable time.
Motivation – must have qualities that are motivating.
Simplicity – it must be simple and clearly established.
Communication - it must be communicated to everyone who is, in some way, connected to
project.
General objective - the one that expresses greater amplitude, requiring more time.
long to be achieved and the action of other actors who, like us, contribute to the
resolution of the same problem.
Thus, the general objective is one that can only be achieved by the summation of the actions of many.
actors. Different actors, different actions, all contributing to achieve the same
purpose.
7
I need each objective to also specify its quantitative, temporal, and meta-objective.
specifically dimensioned, that is, besides expressing what we want, we need to delimit the
how much, in what time and in what place it will take place, (Baptista, 1981).
There are several ways to approach the issues related to the planning of a social project.
I emphasize here three dimensions that seem fundamental to us for understanding the dynamics of this
process:
It is also necessary to remember that these three dimensions are permeated by another, the dimension
pedagogical: describe, analyze and synthesize facts and information; be able to communicate, persuade,
convince; understand and operate in our social environment; recognize and accept differences; know
working in a participative group manner, all of this is part of an important learning
social, (Bolay, 1993).
8
3. Conclusion
9
4. Bibliographic References
Armani, D. (2004). How to develop projects? - Practical guide for project preparation and management.
Baptista, M. V. (2002). Social Planning: intentionality and instrumentation (2nd ed.). São
You will see.
10