Linear Programming Case Studies and Solutions
Linear Programming Case Studies and Solutions
The production of RMC is limited by the availability of the three raw materials.
cousins. For the current production period, RMC has available the
the following quantities of each of the raw materials
Available quantities
Raw Material for production
Raw material 1 20 tons
Raw Material 2 5 tons
Raw material 3 21 tons
The RMC problem is to determine how many tons of each product should be
produce to maximize the total contribution of utility. If you were to
position of production programming for RMC. What decision would you make?
That is, how many tons of fuel additive and how many tons
What solvent base would you produce for the current production period?
Write your decisions below and find your results.1
Solution:
Design of the mathematical model:
Definition of variables
X1 = número de toneladas de aditivo para combustible
X2 = número de toneladas de base disolvente
Objective function:
Maximize the contribution to utility, Z = 40 X1 + 30 X2
Restrictions
Tons of raw material 1 2/5X1 + 1/2X2 ≤ 20
Tons of raw material 2 1/5X2 ≤ 5
Tons of raw material 3 3/5X1 + 3/10X2≤21
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
Output of results
1
Anderson Sweeney Williams. Quantitative Methods for Business. 7th Edition. Publisher
Thomson. Page 220.
Problem report:
Production order:
25 tons of additive
20 tons of solvent base
con:
20 tons of raw material 1,
4 tons of raw material 2, and
21 tons of raw material 3
The client wants to minimize risk but wants to have an annual income on
the investment of at least 60,000 dollars. According to the system of
measurement of Innis risk, each unit acquired in the stock fund
it has a risk index of 8, and each unit acquired in the fund of
the money market has a risk index of 3. The highest risk index
high with the background of actions indicates, simply that it is about a
riskier investment. The Innis client has also specified that it
Invest at least 3,000 dollars in the money market fund.
How many of each of the funds should Innis acquire for the client, if the
Is the objective to minimize the total risk index for that portfolio?2
Solution:
Mathematical model design:
Definition of variables
X1 = número de unidades adquiridas en el fondo de acciones
X2 = number of units acquired in the market fund of
money
Objective function:
Minimize the risk, Z = 8 X1 + 3 X2
Restrictions
Available funds 50X1 + 100X2 ≤ 1,200,000
Annual income 5 X1 + 4X2 ≥ 60,000
Units in fund 100X2≥3.000
2
Anderson Sweeney Willams. Métodos Cuantitativos para los Negocios. 7ma Edición. Editorial
Thomson. Page 242.
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
Advisory report:
Production time
Cut and Sewing Inspection Completed Use by
The manufacturing director estimates that during the next three months they will be
630 hours of cutting and dyeing time available, 600 hours of time
sewing, 708 hours of completion time and 135 hours of inspection time
and packaging for the production of golf bags.
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1= Cantidad de unidades de bolsas de golf estandar
X2= Cantidad de unidades de bolsas de golf de lujo
Objective Function
Z max = 10X1 + 9X2
Restrictions
0.7X1 + 1.0X2 ≤ 630 Cutting and dyeing hours
0.5X1 + 0.8334X2 ≤ 600 Sewing Hours
1.0X1 + 0.6667X2 ≤ 708 Finished Hours
0.1X1 + 0.25X2 ≤ 35 Inspection and Packing Hours
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
Graphical solution:
3
Anderson Sweeney Williams. Quantitative Methods for Business. 7th Edition. Publisher
Thomson. Page 264. Problem 15.
Solver Solution:
a) You must manufacture 539.98 standard golf bags and 252.01 golf bags of
Luxury.
b) Contribución total = $ 7.667,942
c) 620 hours of Cutting and Dyeing will be scheduled, 480.02 hours of Sewing,
708 hours of Finished and 117 hours of Inspection and Packing.
d) The slack times are 119.98 for Sewing and 18 hours for
Inspection and Packaging. The Cutting and Dyeing operations, and Finishing are not
they have slack.
Production time
Court and Sewing Inspection Finished Utility by
Product dyed and packaging Bag
Standard 7/10 1/2 1 1/10 $10
Deluxe 1 5/6 2/3 1/4 $9
The manufacturing director estimates that over the next three months there will be
available 630 hours of cutting and dyeing time, 600 hours of time for
sewing, 708 hours of finishing time and 135 hours of inspection time
and packaging for the production of golf bags.
Solve the described problem and then answer the following questions:
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1= Cantidad de unidades de bolsas de golf estandar
X2= Cantidad de unidades de bolsas de golf de lujo
Objective Function
Z max = 10X1 + 9X2
Restrictions
0.7X1 + 1.0X2 ≤ 630 Cutting and dyeing hours
0.5X1 + 0.8334X2 ≤ 600 Sewing Hours
1.0X1 + 0.6667X2 ≤ 708 Finished Hours
0.1X1 + 0.25X2 ≤ 135 Inspection and Packaging Hours
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
LPG Solution
665
630 Payoff:10.0000X1+9.0000X2=7667.9417
595
560
525
490
455 :0.5000X1+0.8334X2=600.0000
420
385
350
315 :0.1000X1+0.2500X2=135.0000
:0.7000X1+1.0000X2=630.0000
280
245
210
175
140 1.0000X1+0.6667X2=708.0000
105
70
35
0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 720 780 840 900 960 1020 1080 114
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(539.9842,252.0110)
0.7000X1+1.0000X2<=630.0000
0.5000X1+0.8334X2<=600.0000
1.0000X1+0.6667X2<=708.0000
0.1000X1+0.2500X2<=135.0000
4
Anderson Sweeney Williams. Quantitative Methods for Business. 7th Edition. Publisher
Thomson. Page 265. Problem 16.
Solver Solution:
a)
b)
c)
c) What is the total contribution to the profit that Nelson can earn with
the aforementioned production quantities?
d) How many hours of production would be scheduled in each
department?
e) What is the free time of each department?5
Solution:
Objective Function
Z max = 5X1 + 8X2
Restrictions
X1 + 1.5X2 ≤ 900 hours of Cutting and Sewing
0.5X1 + 0.3334X2 ≤ 300 hours of Completion
0.125X1 + 0.25X2 ≤ 100 hours of Packing and Shipping
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
LPG Solution
5
Anderson Sweeney Williams. Quantitative Methods for Business. 7th Edition. Publisher
Thomson. Page 266. Problem 22.
455
Payoff: 5.0 X1 + 8.0 X2 = 3699.9
420
385
350
315
280
245
210
175
140
105
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(500.0,150.0)
1.0X1 + 1.5X2 <= 900.0
0.5X1 + 0.3X2 <= 300.0
: 0.1X1 + 0.3X2 <= 100.0
Solver Output:
Solution:
Definition of variables
X1 = amount of money invested in bond fund
X2 = cantidad de dinero invertido en fondo de acciones
Objective Function
Zmax = 1X1 + 1X2
Restrictions
X1≥30% (100) investment in bond fund
6% X1 + 10% X2 ≥ 7.5% (100) total yield
X1 + X2 ≤ 100 relationship between investments
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
6
Anderson Sweeney Willams. Métodos Cuantitativos para los Negocios. 7ma Edición. Editorial
Thomson. Page 266. Problem 23.
Solver results:
Graphical solution:
7. The owner of Sea Warf Restaurant would like to determine the best way
to assign a monthly advertising budget of 1,000 dollars among
newspapers and radio. The administration has decided that at least 25% of
the budget should be used for each of these two types of media and that the
the amount of money spent on advertising in local newspapers must have for the
less than double what is spent on radio. A marketing consultant has
developed an index that measures audience exposure per dollar of
advertising on a scale from 0 to 100, where higher index values
indicate higher exposures to the audience. If the value of the index for advertising
In local newspapers it is 50, and for the radio announcement it is 80, how
the administration should allocate the advertising budget in order to
maximize the total exposure value in the auditorium?
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad de dólares asignados a periódicos
X2 = Cantidad de dólares asignados a radio
Objective Function
Zmax= 50X1 + 80X2
Restrictions
X1 ≥ 0.25(X1 + X2) minimum for newspapers
X2 ≥ 0.25(X1 + X2) minimum for radio
X1 ≥ 2X2 relationship between periodicals and radius
X1 + X2 ≤ 1000 budget
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
LPG solution
7
Anderson Sweeney Willams. Métodos Cuantitativos para los Negocios. 7ma Edición. Editorial
Thomson. Page 266. Problem 24.
X2
400 Payoff:50.00X1+80.00X2=46000.00
380
360
340
320
300 : 1.00 X1 + 2.00 X2 = 1000.00
280
260 0.75 X1 - 0.25 X2 = 0.00
240
220
200
180
160
140
120 :-0.25X1+0.75X2=0.00
100
80
60 1.00 X1 - 2.00 X2 = 0.00
40
20
0
0 33 66 99 132 165 198 231 264 297 330 363 396 429 462 495 528 561 594 627 660
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(600.00,200.00)
0.75X1 - 0.25X2 >= 0.00
:-0.25X1+0.75X2>=0.00
1.00X1 - 2.00X2 >= 0.00
1.00X1 + 2.00X2 <= 1000.00
The risk index per action is a classification of the relative risk of two
investment alternatives. For the given data, it is thought that U.S. OIL is the
investment subject to higher risk. By restricting the total risk of the portfolio, the firm
of investments avoids placing excessive amounts of the portfolio in investments
potentially high yield and high risk. For the current portfolio, it
It has set an upper limit of 700 for the total risk index of all the
investments, the company has also established an upper limit of 1,000
shares for the riskier U.S. OIL values. How many shares of each
one of these values must be acquired in order to maximize performance
annual total?8
Solution:
8
Anderson Sweeney Willams. Métodos Cuantitativos para los Negocios. 7ma Edición. Editorial
Thomson. Page 267. Problem 25.
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad de acciones en [Link]
X2 = Cantidad de acciones en Hub Properties
Objective Function
Z max = 3X1 + 5X2
Restrictions
0.50X1 + 0.25X2 ≤ 700 for risk
X1 ≤ 1000 investment in U.S. OIL
25X1 + 50X2 = 80,000 investment in stocks
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
LPG solution
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(800.00,1200.00)
0.50X1 + 0.25X2 <= 700.00
1.00X1 + 0.00X2 <= 1000.00
25.00X1+50.00X2<=80000.00
No
Restrictions Used Limit Utilize
Risk 0.5 0.25 0.75 ≤ 700 699.25
In U.S. Oil 1 1≤ 1000 999
Investment 25 50 75≤ 80000 79925
SOLVER Output Data
No
Restrictions Used Limit Utiliz
Risk 0.5 0.25 700≤ 700 -7.4E-10
In U.S. Oil 1 800≤ 1000 200
Investment 25 50 80000≤ 80000 -7.3E-08
Tom produces several Mexican food products and sells them to Western.
Foods, a chain of grocery stores located in Texas and New Mexico.
Tom's sauce factory: Western Foods Salsa and Mexico City Salsa.
Essentially, both products are mixtures of whole tomatoes, 30% sauce.
20% tomato and 20% tomato paste. The Mexico City Salsa, which has a
thicker and chunkier consistency, made with 70% tomatoes
whole tomatoes, 10% tomato sauce and 20% tomato paste. Each jar of
salsa produced weighs 10 ounces. For the current production period, Tom's
you can acquire up to 280 pounds of whole tomatoes, 130 pounds of sauce of
tomato and 100 pounds of tomato paste, the price per pound of these ingredients
$0.96, $0.64, and $0.56 respectively. The cost of the spices and of the
other ingredients are approximately $0.10 per container. Tom's purchase
empty glass jars for $0.02 each, and the labeling and filling costs are
they estimate at $0.03 for each jar of sauce produced. Tom's contract with
Western Foods results in sales revenue of $1.64 for each jar of
Western Foods Salsa and $1.93 for each jar of Mexico City Salsa.
[Link] a linear programming model that allows Tom's
determine the sauce mix that maximizes the total contribution to profit.
b. Make a graph of the feasible region.
c. Solve the appropriate simultaneous linear equations in order to determine
the coordinates of each endpoint.
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad de tarros de salsa Western Foods
X2 = Cantidad de tarros de salsa México City
Objective Function
Z max =
(1.64 - (0.10 + 0.02 + 0.03 + 50% (10)(0.96) / 16 + 30% (10)(0.64) / 16 + 20% (10)(0.56) / 16)) X1 +
(1.93 - (0.10 + 0.02 + 0.03 + 70%(10)(0.96)/16 + 10%(10)(0.64)/16 + 20%(10)(0.56)/16)) X 2
Restrictions
5X1 + 7X2 ≤ 4480 pounds of whole tomatoes
3X1 + 1X2 ≤ 2080 pounds of tomato sauce
2X1 + 2X2 ≤ 1600 pounds of tomato paste
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
9
Anderson Sweeney Williams. Quantitative Methods for Business. 7th Edition. Publisher
Thomson. Page 267. Problem 26.
800
750
700
Payoff: 1.00 X1 + 1.25 X2 = 860.00
650
600 : 2.00 X1 + 2.00 X2 = 1600.00
550
: 3.00 X1 + 1.00 X2 = 2080.00
500
450
: 5.00 X1 + 7.00 X2 = 4480.00
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
1 50 99 148 197 246 295 344 393 442 491 540 589 638 687 736 785 834 883 932
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(560.00,240.00)
5.00X1 + 7.00X2 <= 4480.00
3.00X1 + 1.00X2 <= 2080.00
: 2.00X1 + 2.00X2 <= 1600.00
Western Mexico
SALSA Foods City
Number of jars 1 1 Max
Utility 1 1.25 2.25
Solver output
Planning for Tom's
Western Mexico
SALSA Foods City
Number of jars 560 240 Max
Utility 1 1.25 860
Solution:
Formulation of the model:
Definition of variables
X1 = cantidad de páginas revisadas por Erhan
X2 = cantidad de páginas revisadas por Sue
Objective Function
Z max = 9X1 + 6X2
Restrictions
3X1 + 2X2 ≤ 4,800 budget
X1 + X2 = 1.800 number of pages
X1/100 ≤ 10 days available of Erhan
X2/150 ≤ 12 available days of Sue
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
LPG solution
10
Anderson Sweeney Willams. Métodos Cuantitativos para los Negocios. 7ma Edición. Editorial
Thomson. Page 267. Problem 27.
X2
2000 : 3.0 X1 + 2.0 X2 = 4800.0
1900
1800 0.0 X1 + 1.0 X2 = 1800.0
1700
1600
1500
1400 : 1.0 X1 + 0.0 X2 = 1000.0
1300
1200
1100
1000
900 : 1.0 X1 + 1.0 X2 = 1800.0
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540 600 660 720 780 840 900 960 1020108011401200 X1
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(1000.0,800.0)
3.0X1 + 2.0X2 <= 4800.0
1.0X1 + 1.0X2 <= 1800.0
1.0X1 + 0.0X2 <= 1000.0
0.0X1 + 1.0X2 <= 1800.0
Output SOLVER
[Link] Phones sells two models of car phone: X and Y. The records
it shows that 3 hours of sales time are used for each model of
X phone sold, and 5 hours of sales time for each phone of the model.
Y. A total of 600 hours of sales are available for the next period.
four weeks. In addition, the administration's planning policies
they require minimum sales targets of 25 units, both for the X and for the
Y.
a. Show the feasible region
b. If the company obtains a contribution to profit of 40 dollars for each
Model X sold and a contribution to the profit of 50 dollars for each
Y model sold. What is the optimal sales goal for the company during
the 4-week period?
c. Develop a constraint and show the feasible region if the administration
add the restriction that Car Phones must sell at least as many
phones And like phones X.
d. What is the new optimal solution if the constraint is added to the problem?
of clause (c)?11
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Número de unidades de teléfonos modelo X
X2 = Número de unidades de teléfonos modelo Y
Objective Function
Zmax = 40X1 + 50X2
Restrictions
3X1 + 5X2 ≤ 600 available sales hours
X1 ≥ 25 minimum sales meta
X2 ≥ 25 minimum sales target
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
LPG Solution
11
Anderson Sweeney Williams. Quantitative Methods for Business. 7th Edition. Publisher
Thomson. Page 268. Problem 28.
X2
2
2 X1
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(158.3,25.0)
3.0X1 + 5.0X2 <= 600.0
1.0X1 + 0.0X2 >= 25.0
0.0X1 + 1.0X2 >= 25.0
Model Model
Telephone X Y
Quantity 1 1 Max
Utility 40 50 90
No
Restrictions Used Limit Utilize
Available hours 3 5 8≤ 600 592
Sale min X 1 1≥ 25 -24
Minimum sale Y 1 1≥ 25 -24
Model Model
Telephone X Y
Quantity 158.3333 25 Max
Utility 40 50 7583.333
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad de onzas de comida Bark Bits
X2 = Cantidad de onzas de comida Canine Chow
Objective Function
Zmin = 0.06X1 + 0.05X2
Restrictions
0.3X1 + 0.2X2 ≥ 5 protein content
0.15 X1 + 0.3 X2 ≥ 3 fat content
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
LPG solution
12
Anderson Sweeney Willams. Métodos Cuantitativos para los Negocios. 7ma Edición. Editorial
Thomson. Page 269. Problem 34.
36
30
24
12
0.15 X1 + 0.30 X2 = 3.00
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(15.00,2.50)
0.30X1 + 0.20X2 >= 5.00
0.15X1 + 0.30X2 >= 3.00
Bark Canine
Food Bits Chow
Quantity 1 1 Min
Quality 0.06 0.05 0.11
No
Restrictions Used Usage limit
Proteins 0.3 0.2 0.5 ≥ 5 4.5
Fats 0.15 0,3 0.45 ≥ 3 2.55
Bark Canine
Food Bits Chow
Quantity 15 2.5 minutes
Quality 0.06 0.05 1,025
No
Restrictions Used Usage limit
-3.3E-
Proteins 0.3 0.2 5 ≥ 5 12
-2.2E
Fats 0.15 0.3 3≥ 3 12
13. The New England Cheese Company produces two cream cheeses by mixing cheeses.
both mild and extra strong cheddar. Cream cheeses are packaged in
12-ounce containers, which are then sold to distributors all over the
northwest. The Regular blend contains 80% mild cheddar and 20%
extra strong and the Zesty mix contains 60% mild cheddar and 40%
extra strong. This year, a local dairy cooperative has offered to deliver up to
8.100 pounds of cheddar cheese at $1.20 per pound and up to 3,000 pounds of cheese
extra strong cheddar at $1.40 per pound. The cost of mixing and packing these
cream cheeses, excluding the cost of the cheese itself, is $0.20 per container.
If each Regular container sells for $1.95 and each Zesty container sells
at $2.20. How many containers should New England Cheese produce of Regular?
and Zesty?13
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad (en miles) de recipientes de queso Regular
X2 = Cantidad (en miles) de recipientes de queso Zesty
Objective Function
Zmax = (1.95–0.20 - 0.80*0.75*1.20–0.60*0.75*1.40)X1 +
(2.20–2.0–0.20*0.75*1.20–0.40*0.75*1.40)X2
Zmax = 0.40X1 + 1.40X2
Restrictions
0.80*0.75X1 + 0.60*0.75X2 ≤ 8.1 soft cheddar cheese
0.20*0.75X1 + 0.40*0.75X2 ≤ 3.0 extra strong cheddar cheese
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
LPG Solution
13
Anderson Sweeney Williams. Quantitative Methods for Business. 7th Edition. Publisher
Thomson. Page 269. Problem 35.
0.82 X1 + 0.64
X2
10
Payoff: 0.4 X1 + 1.4 X2 = 14.0
9
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 X1
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(0.0,10.0)
: 0.8X1 + 0.6X2 <= 10.8
0.2X1 + 0.4X2 <= 4.0
No
Restrictions Used Usage Limit
Soft Ch. cheese 0.8 0.6 1.4≤ 10.8 9.4
Production time min 0.2 0.4 0.6 ≤ 4 3.4
No
Restrictions Used Limit Utilize
Soft Ch. cheese 0.8 0.6 6 ≤ 10.8 4.8
Production time min 0.2 0.4 4≤ 4 -5.5E-12
Note that each ounce of cereal A provides two grams of dietary fiber and that
each ounce of cereal B provides 1.5 grams of dietary fiber, so if Healthtech
going to develop the new product using a blend made of 50% of
cereal A and 50% of cereal B, one ounce of this would contain 1.75 grams of fiber
dietetic. The nutritional requirements of Healthtech demand that each ounce of the
new food should have at least 1.7 grams of dietary fiber, no more than 2.8
grams of fat and no more than 3.6 grams of protein. The cost of cereal A is
at $0.02 per ounce and that of B is $0.025 per ounce. Healthtech wants
determine how much of each cereal is needed to produce one ounce of
new product at the lowest possible cost.
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad de onzas de cereal A
X2 = Cantidad de onzas de cereal B
Objective Function
Zmin = 0.02X1 + 0.025X2
Restrictions
2X1 + 1.5X2 ≥ 1.7 for dietary fiber
2X1 + 3X2 ≤ 2.8 for fats
4X1 + 3X2 ≤ 3.6 for proteins
X1 + X2 = 1 ounce
14
Anderson Sweeney Willams. Métodos Cuantitativos para los Negocios. 7ma Edición. Editorial
Thomson. Page 269. Problem 36.
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
LPG solution
X2
1
Payoff:0.020X1+0.025X2=0.017
:4.000X1+3.000X2=3.600
:2.000X1+3.000X2=2.800
0 :2.000X1+1.500X2=1.700
0 1 X1
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(0.850,0.000)
2.000X1+1.500X2>=1.700
2.000X1+3.000X2<=2.800
4.000X1+3.000X2<=3.600
Cereal A B
Quantity in ounces 1 1 min
Cost 0.02 0.025 0.045
No
Restrictions Used Limit Use
dietary fiber 2 1.5 3.5 greater than or 1.7
equal to 1.8
for fats 2 3 5≤ 2.8 -2,2
for proteins 4 3 7≤ 3.6 -3.4
Cereal A B
Quantity in ounces 0.85 0 min
No
Restrictions Used Limit Utilize
9.12E-
dietary fiber 2 1.5 1.7≥ 1.7 13
for fats 2 3 1,7≤ 2.8 1,1
by proteins 4 3 3.4 ≤ 3.6 0.2
15.MD Chemical produces two products that are sold as raw materials for
companies that manufacture bath soaps, laundry detergents, and others
soap products. Based on an analysis of the current levels of
inventories and potential demand for the next month, the administration
of MD has specified that the total production of products 1 and 2
combinations must be at least 350 gallons. It must also comply with
an order from a client of importance for 125 gallons of product 1. The
processing time of product 1 requires two hours per gallon, and of the
product 2 requires one hour; for the following month, there are availabilities
600 hours of process. The production costs are 2 dollars per gallon of
product 1 and 3 dollars of product 2.
a. Determine the production quantities that meet the requirements
specified at the minimum cost.
b. What is the total cost of the product?
c. Identify the amount of any excess production.15
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad de galones del producto 1
X2 = Cantidad de galones de producto 2
Objective Function
Zmin = 2X1 + 3X2
Restrictions
X1 + X2 ≥ 350 gallons produced
X1 ≥ 125 customer order
2X1 + 1X2 ≤ 600 process hours
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
LPG solution
15
Anderson Sweeney Williams. Quantitative Methods for Business. 7th Edition. Publisher
Thomson. Page 270. Problem 37.
X2
440
418
396
374
352
330
308
286
264 Payoff: 2.0 X1 + 3.0 X2 = 800.0
242
220
198
176
154
132
110
88 : 2.0 X1 + 1.0 X2 = 600.0
66
44 : 1.0 X1 + 0.0 X2 = 125.0
22
0 : 1.0 X1 + 1.0 X2 = 350.0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 380 400 X1
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(250.0,100.0)
1.0X1 + 1.0X2 >= 350.0
: 1.0X1 + 0.0X2 >= 125.0
2.0X1 + 1.0X2 <= 600.0
Product 1 2
Gallons amount 1 1 min
Cost 2 3 5
No
Restrictions Used Limit Utilize
Gallons
produced 1 1 2≥ 350 -348
Customer order 1 1≥ 125 124
Process hours 2 1 3≤ 600 597
Product 1 2
Quantity gallons 250 100 min
Cost 2 3 800
[Link] Chemicals produces two types of fluid for photographic development. Both
products cost the company one dollar per gallon to produce. Based on
an analysis of current inventory levels and outstanding orders for the
Next, the management of Photo Chemicals has decided that during
the following two weeks at least 30 gallons of the product are produced
1 and at least 20 gallons of product 2. The administration has also said
that the inventory should be used within the next two weeks
existing of a very perishable raw material necessary in the production of
both fluids. The current inventory of this highly perishable raw material is
80 pounds. Although if necessary, more of this material can be ordered.
First, any unused part of the current inventory will go to waste.
within the following two weeks; hence the requirement of the
administration that at least 80 pounds are used in the following two
weeks. Additionally, product 1 requires one pound of this raw material
perishable per gallon, and product 2 requires 2 pounds of the raw material per
gallon. Since the objective of management is to keep costs of
production at the lowest possible level, they are looking for a production plan of
minimum cost that utilizes all 80 pounds of the raw material
perishable and that obtains at least 30 gallons of product 1 and for
less than 20 gallons of product 2. What is the minimum cost solution?16
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad de galones de fluido tipo 1
X2 = Cantidad de galones de fluido tipo 2
Objective Function
Zmin = X1 + X2
Restrictions
X1 ≥ 30 minimum production of product 1
X2 ≥ 20 minimum production of product 2
X1 + 2X2 ≥ 80 pounds of raw material
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
16
Anderson Sweeney Williams. Quantitative Methods for Business. 7th Edition. Publisher
Thomson. Page 270. Problem 38.
LPG solution
X2
25 : 1.0 X1 + 2.0 X2 = 80.0
24
23
22
21
20
19 : 0.0 X1 + 1.0 X2 = 20.0
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11 1.0 X1 + 0.0 X2 = 30.0
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 X1
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(40.0,20.0)
1.0X1 + 0.0X2 >= 30.0
0.0X1 + 1.0X2 >= 20.0
1.0X1 + 2.0X2 <= 80.0
Solution:
Formulation of the model:
17
Anderson Sweeney Willams. Métodos Cuantitativos para los Negocios. 7ma Edición. Editorial
Thomson. Page 270. Problem 39.
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad de Pizzas Normales
X2 = Cantidad de Pizzas De Lujo
Objective Function
Zmax = 1X1 + 1.5X2
Restrictions
X1 + X2 ≤ 150 flour dough
0.25X1 + 0.5X2 ≤ 50 stuffing pasta
X1 ≥ 50 sale of regular pizzas
X2 ≥ 25 luxury pizza sales
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
LPG solution
160
152
144
136
: 1.00 X1 + 0.00 X2 = 50.00
128
120
112
104
96
88
80 : 1.00 X1 + 1.00 X2 = 150.00
72
64
Payoff: 1.00 X1 + 1.50 X2 = 175.00
56
48
40
32 : 0.00 X1 + 1.00 X2 = 25.00
24
: 0.25 X1 + 0.50 X2 = 50.00
16
8
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(100.00,50.00)
: 1.00X1 + 1.00X2 <= 150.00
0.25X1 + 0.50X2 <= 50.00
1.00X1 + 0.00X2 >= 50.00
0.00X1 + 1.00X2 >= 25.00
No
Restrictions Used Limit Used
Pasta flour 1 1 2 ≤ 150 148
Filling 0.25 0.5 0.75 ≤ 50 49.25
Regular Pizzas 1 1≥ 50 -49
Luxury Pizzas 1 1≥ 25 -24
No
Restrictions Used Limit Utilize
Flour pasta 1 1 150≤ 150 -3.4E-10
Filling 0.25 0.5 50≤ 50 -6E-11
Normal Pizzas 1 100≥ 50 50
Luxury Pizzas 1 50≥ 25 25
18. English Motors, Ltd. (EML) has developed a new sports vehicle.
utility, with all-wheel drive. As part of the campaign
marketing, EML has developed a sales presentation on video tape
that will be sent to owners of four-wheel drive vehicles
Current EMLs, such as for owners of four-wheel drive utility vehicles.
wheels offered by EML competitors refer to these two markets
objective as current customer market and new customer market. The
Individuals who receive the new promotional video will also receive a coupon.
for a test drive of the new EML model, over a weekend.
A key factor in the success of this new promotion is the response rate, it is
say the percentage of individuals who receive the new promotion and make the
test run of the new model, EML estimates that the response rate
for the current customer market is 25% and for the customer market
New is 20%. The sales rate is the percentage of individuals who receive
the new promotion, take the test drive and make the purchase. The
Market research studies indicate that the sales rate is 12%
for the current customer market and 20% for the new customer market.
The cost of each promotion, excluding the costs of the trial run, is
5 dollars for each promotion sent to the current customer market and 4
dollars for each promotion sent to the market of new customers. The
the administration has also decided that the new promotion should be sent to
un mínimo d 30.000 clientes actuales y a un mínimo de 10.000 clientes nuevos.
In addition, the number of current customers who take the test drive of the
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad de promociones enviadas a clientes actuales
X2 = Cantidad de promociones enviadas a clientes nuevos
Objective Function
Zmax = 0.12*5X1 + 0.20*4X2
Restrictions
X1 ≥ 30,000 current customers
X2 ≥ 10,000 new clients
0.25X1 ≥ 2*0.20X2 relationship between customers who respond to the promotion
5X1 + 4X2 ≤ 1,200,000 budget
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
LPG Solution
18
Anderson Sweeney Willams. Métodos Cuantitativos para los Negocios. 7ma Edición. Editorial
Thomson. Page 274. Problem 61.
X2
273
260
247
234
221 Payoff: 0.60 X1 + 0.80 X2 = 176.00
208
195
182 : 5.00 X1 + 4.00 X2 = 1200.00
169
156
143 : 1.00 X1 + 0.00 X2 = 30.00
130
117
104
91
78
65 : 0.25 X1 - 0.40 X2 = 0.00
52
39
26 : 0.00 X1 + 1.00 X2 = 10.00
13
0
0 13 26 39 52 65 78 91 104 117 130 143 156 169 182 195 208 221 234 247 2
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(160.00,100.00)
1.00X1 + 0.00X2 >= 30.00
0.00X1 + 1.00X2 >= 10.00
: 0.25X1 - 0.40X2 >= 0.00
5.00X1 + 4.00X2 <= 1200.00
Clients Clients
Promotions Current New
Quantity in
miles 1 1 max
Sales 0.6 0.8 1.4
No
Restrictions Used Limit utilize
Current clients 1 1≥ 30 29
New clients 1 1≥ 10 9
Client relationship 0.25 -0.4 -0.15≥ 0 -0.15
Budget 5 4 9≤ 1200 -1191
Clients Clients
Promotions Current New
Quantity in
miles 160 100 max
Sales 0.6 0.8 176
19. Creative Sports Designs (CSD) manufactures standard size rackets and
extragrande. The company's rackets are extremely light due to
use of a magnesium and graphite alloy invented by the founder of the
company. Each standard-sized racket uses 0.125 kilograms of alloy and
each extra-large racket uses 0.4 kilos; for the next period of
Production for two weeks only has 80 kilos of alloy available. Each
Standard size racket takes 10 minutes of manufacturing time and each
The oversized racket takes 12 minutes. Contributions to the
profit is 10 dollars for each standard racket and 15 dollars for each
super oversized racket and 40 hours of production time are available for
week. The administration has specified that at least 20% of the
Total production must be of standard sized rackets. How many rackets
each type must manufacture CSD in the following two weeks, in order to
maximize the contribution to profit? Assume that, due to the nature
unique to its products, CSD can sell as many rackets as it can
produce.19
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad de unidades de raquetas estandar
X2 = cantidad de unidades de raquetas extra grande
Objective Function
Zmax = 10X1 + 15X2
Restrictions
0.125X1 + 0.4X2 ≤ 80 kilograms of alloy
10X1 + 12X2 ≤ 40*60 minutes of production time
X1 ≥ 0.20(X1 + X2)
No negativity
Xi ≥ 0; i = 1, 2
LPG solution
19
Anderson Sweeney Williams. Quantitative Methods for Business. 7th Edition. Publisher
Thomson. Page 274. Problem 62.
X2
200
190 :0.125X1+0.400X2=80.000
180
170 Payoff:10.000X1+15.000X2=2896.551
160
150
140 10,000X1+12,000X2=2,400,000
130
120
110
100
90
80
:0.800X1-0.200X2=0.000
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 X1
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(41.379,165.517)
0.125X1+0.400X2<=80.000
10.000X1+12.000X2<=2400.000
:0.800X1-0.200X2>=0.000
No
Restrictions Used Limit Utilize
Alloy kilos 0.125 0.4 0.525 ≤ 80 79,475
Production time min 10 12 22≤ 2400 2378
20% production standard 0.8 -0.2 0.6 ≥ 0 0.6
20. The management of High Tech Service (HTS) wants to develop a model that will
help assign the time of your technicians between service calls for
contract for both regular and new clients. During the planning period of
In two weeks, a maximum of 80 hours of technician time is available. In order to
to meet cash flow requirements, at least 800 must be generated
dollars of income (per technician) during the two-week period. The time
technician for regular clients generates 25 dollars per hour, but for
new clients only generate an average of 8 dollars per hour, because in
In many cases, contact with the client does not result in billable services.
To ensure that new contacts are maintained, the technician's time
used in contacts with new clients must be at least 60% of the
time spent in contacts with normal clients. For the requirements of
income and stated policies, HTS would like to determine how to allocate the
time of technicians between regular and new clients, in order to maximize the
total number of clients in contact during the two-week period. The
Technicians require an average of 50 minutes for each customer contact.
normal and one hour for each contact with a new client.
a. Develop a linear programming model that allows HTS to allocate the
time of the technicians between regular and new clients.
b. Make a graph of the feasible region
c. Solve the appropriate simultaneous linear equations to determine the
values of X1 and X2 at each extreme point of the feasible region.
d. Find the optimal solution20
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Numero de horas de técnico asignado a clientes normales
X2 = Numero de horas de técnico asignado a clientes nuevos
Objective Function
Zmax = 60X1/50 + 60X2/60 number of customers
Restricciones
X1 + X2 ≤ 80 available hours of technician
X2 ≥ 0.6X1 relationship of technician time
25X1 + 8X2 ≥ 800 income in dollars
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
20
Anderson Sweeney Williams. Quantitative Methods for Business. 7th Edition. Publisher
Thomson. Page 274. Problem 63.
LPG Solution
104
78
65
52
39
:25.00X1+8.00X2=800.00
:-0.60X1+1.00X2=0.00
26
0
0 11 22 33 44 55 66 77
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(50.00,30.00)
1.00X1 + 1.00X2 <= 80.00
-0.60X1+1.00X2>=0.00
25.00X1+8.00X2>=800.00
Clients Clients
New normal working hours
Number of hours 1 1 max
Number of clients 1.2 1 2.2
Clients Clients
New regular working hours
Number of hours 50 30 max
Number of clients 1.2 1 90
Solution:
Formulation of the model:
Definition of variables
X1 = Numero de horas de trabajo de maquina M100
X2 = Numero de horas de trabajo de maquina M200
Objective Function
Zmax = (20X1*18–40X1*6–50X1) + (40X2*18–50X2*6–75X2)
21
Anderson Sweeney Willams. Métodos Cuantitativos para los Negocios. 7ma Edición. Editorial
Thomson. Page 275. Problem 64.
Restrictions
X1 ≤ 15 maximum working hours M100
X2 ≤ 10 maximum working hours of M200
X1 ≥ 5 minimum working hours of M100
X2 ≥ 5 minimum working hours of M200
40X1 + 50X2 ≤ 1000 pounds of available raw material
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
LPG solution
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(12.5,10.0)
1.0X1 + 0.0X2 <= 15.0
0.0X1 + 1.0X2 <= 10.0
1.0X1 + 0.0X2 >= 5.0
0.0X1 + 2.0X2 >= 5.0
40.0X1 + 50.0X2 <= 1000.0
Machine Machine
Working hours M100 M200
Number of hours 1 1 max
Contribution utility 70 345 415
Machine Machine
Working hours M100 M200
Number of hours 12.5 10 max
Contribution utility 70 345 4325
Profit data, costs, and effort of the sales staff for Electronic
Effort of
Channel of Utilities by Cost of personal sales advertising
distribution unit sold per unit sold per unit sold
Marine Distribution $90 $10 2 hours
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Numero de radios asignados a distribuidores de equipo marino
X2 = Numero de radios asignados a distribuidores de equipos de oficina
X3 = Numero de radios asignados a cadenas nacionales de tiendas
X4 = Numero de radios asignados a pedidos por correo
Objective Function
Zmax = 90X1 + 84X2 + 70X3 + 60X4
Restrictions
10X1 + 8X2 + 9X3 + 15X4 ≤ 5,000 for budget
2X1 + 3X2 + 3X3 ≤ 1,800 hours of sales effort
X3 ≥ 150 minimum units for national chains
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,4
USE OF
RESTRICTIONS RESOURCES Used LIMIT Do not use
Budget 10 8 9 15 42≤ 5000 4958.00
Labor effort 2 3 3 8≤ 1800 1792.00
Nation chain contract 1 1≥ 150 -149.00
22
Anderson Sweeney Willams. Métodos Cuantitativos para los Negocios. 7ma Edición. Editorial
Thomson. Page 298.
USE OF
RESTRICTIONS RESOURCES Used LIMIT Do not use
Budget 10 8 9 15 5000≤ 5000 0.00
Labor effort 2 3 3 1800≤ 1800 0.00
Chain contract
nation 1 150≥ 150 0.00
Action
Financial data A B C D
Price per share ($) 100 50 80 40
Annual yield rate 0.12 0.08 0.06 0.10
Irrigation measure per dollar 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.08
The risk measure indicates the relative uncertainty associated with the action, in
function of its ability to reach its projected annual performance; values
higher values indicate greater risk. Risk measures are provided
by the main financial advisor of the company.
The general administration of National has stipulated the following courses of action.
for investments:
The annual return rate of the portfolio must be at least 9%
None of the values can represent more than 50% of the investment.
total in dollars.
Solution a):
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad de acciones asignados a opción A
X2 = Cantidad de acciones asignados a opción B
X3 = Cantidad de acciones asignados a opción C
X4 = Cantidad de acciones asignados a opción D
Objective Function
Zmin = 10X1 + 3.5X2 + 4.0X3 + 3.2X4
Restrictions
100X1 + 50X2 + 80X3 + 40X4 ≤ 200,000 dollars available
12X1 + 4.0X2 + 4.8X3 + 4.0X4 ≥ 0.09*200,000 output
100 times 1 is less than or equal to 0.5 times 200,000.
maximum investment of X1
50X2 ≤ 0.5 * 200,000 maximum investment of X2
80X3 ≤ 0.5 * 200,000 maximum investment of X3
40X4 ≤ 0.5 * 200,000 maximum investment of X4
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,4
Input data SOLVER
National Insurance Associates
Actions
Assigned actions to A B C D
Cantidad 1 1 1 1 Min
Risk 10 3.5 4 3.2 20.7
23
Anderson Sweeney Williams. Quantitative Methods for Business. 7th Edition. Publisher
Thomson. Page 316. Problem 16.
Solver Results
National Insurance Associates
Actions
Assigned actions to A B C D
Quantity 333.3333 0 833.333333 2500 Min
Risk 10 3.5 4 3.2 14666.67
USE OF
RESTRICTIONS RESOURCES Used LIMIT I do not use
Available dollars 100 50 80 40 200000≤200000 0.00
Annual performance 12 4 4.8 4 18000 ≥ 18000 0.00
Max investment in A 100 33333.33 ≤ 100000 66666.67
Max investment in B 50 0≤100000 100000.00
Max investment in C 80 66666.67 ≤ 100000 33333.33
Max investment in D 40 100000≤100000 0.00
24. The management of Carson Stapler Manufacturing Company forecasts for the
next quarter a demand of 5000 units for its Sure-Hold model.
This stapler is assembled from three main components: the
base, the staple cartridge and the handle. So far Carson has manufactured the three.
components. However, the forecast of 5000 units is a new
maximum sales volume and the company may not have enough capacity to
production for the manufacture of all components. The management is
thinking of hiring a local maquiladora company to produce at least
a part of the components. The production time requirements for
unit are as follows:
Time
Production time (hours) available
Department Base Cartridge Handle (hours)
A 0.03 0.02 0.05 400
B 0.04 0.02 0.04 400
C 0.02 0.03 0.01 400
a. Determine what the decision to manufacture or buy would be for Carson, that makes
that the demand for 5000 units can be met at a minimum total cost.
For each component, how many units should be manufactured and how many
should be acquired?
b. What departments are limiting the production volume? If I could
considered overtime at an additional cost of $3 per hour, what
Should department or departments be a reason for extra time?
Explain.
c. Suppose that in department A up to 80 hours can be scheduled
overtime. What would you recommend?24
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X11 = Numero de bases para grapadoras producidas
X12 = Numero de cartuchos para grapadoras producidos
X13 = Numero de manijas producidas para grapadoras producidas
X21 = Numero de bases para grapadoras adquiridas
X22 = Numero de cartuchos para grapadoras adquiridos
X23 = Numero de manijas para grapadoras adquiridas
Objective Function
Zmin = 0.75X11 + 0.40X12 + 1.10X13 + 0.95X21 + 0.55X22 + 1.40X23
Restrictions
0.03X11 + 0.02X12 + 0.05X13 ≤ 400 available hours Dep. A
0.04X11 + 0.02X12 + 0.04X13 ≤ 400 available hours Dep. B
0.02X11 + 0.03X12 + 0.01X13 ≤ 400 available hours Dep. C
X11 + X21 = 5,000 quantity of bases
X12 + X22 = 5.000 quantity of cartridges
X13 + X23 = 5.000 cantidad de manijas
No negativity
Xij≥0; i=1,2; j=1,3
24
Anderson Sweeney Williams. Quantitative Methods for Business. 7th Edition. Publisher
Thomson. Page 316. Problem 17.
[Link] Shafts (GSI) produces graphite shafts for various club manufacturers.
golf. Two manufacturing facilities of GSI, one located in San Diego and another
in Tampa, they have the capacity to produce rods in various degrees of stiffness,
from normal models, primarily used by average golfers, to
ultra-rigid models, primarily used by golfers with a low handicap and
professionals. GSI has just received a contract for the production of 200,000
normal poles and 75,000 rigid ones. Given that both plants are currently
producing golf clubs to fulfill previous orders, none of the
The plant has sufficient capacity, on its own, to fulfill the new order.
The San Diego plant can produce up to a total of 120,000 sticks, and the one in
Tampa, up to a total of 180,000 golf clubs. Due to differences in
equipment in each of the plants and different labor costs,
unit production costs are different, as shown in
continuation:
Solution a):
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Numero de unid. de palos de golf normales fabricados en San Diego
X2 = Numero de unid. de palos de golf extrarígidos fabricados en San Diego
X3 = Numero de palos de golf normales fabricados en Tampa
X4 = Numero de palos de golf extrarígidos fabricados en Tampa
Objective Function
Zmin = 5.25X1 + 5.45X2 + 4.95X3 + 5.70X4
Restrictions
X1 + X3 = 200,000 normal golf clubs
X2 + X4 = 75,000 extra stiff golf clubs
X1 + X2 ≤ 120,000 poles manufactured in San Diego
X3 + X4 ≤ 180,000 poles manufactured in Tampa
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,4
Input data SOLVER
Golf Shafts (GSI)
San Diego Tampa
Golf Clubs Normal Extrarigid Normal Extrarigid
Quantity 1 1 1 1 Min
Costs 5.25 5.25 4.95 5.7 21.15
25
Anderson Sweeney Williams. Quantitative Methods for Business. 7th Edition. Publisher
Thomson. Page 317. Problem 18.
26. The Pfeiffer Company manages approximately 15 million dollars for its
clients. For each Client, Pfeiffer chooses a blend of three types of
investments: a growth equity fund, an income fund, and a
money market fund. Each client has different investment goals.
and different risk tolerances. To cater to these differences, Pfeiffer
set limits on each portfolio for the percentages that can be invested
in these three funds and assigns a risk index to each client.
Just as this system works for Dennos Hartmann, one of the clients of
Pfeiffer Based on an assessment of Hartmann's risk tolerance,
Pfeiffer has assigned a score of 0.05 to Hartmann's portfolio. In addition,
to maintain some diversity, the fraction of Hartmann's portfolio invested
in growth and income funds must be at least 10% each
at least 20% must be invested in money market funds.
Solution a):
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad de dólares asignados a valores de crecimiento
X2 = Cantidad de dólares asignados a ingresos
X3 = Cantidad de dólares asignados a mercado de dinero
Objective Function
Zmax = 0.20X1 + 0.10X2 + 0.06X3
Restrictions
X1 ≥ 0.10*300,000 for growth values
X2 ≥ 0.10*300,000 for income
X3 ≥ 0.20*300,000 for money market
X1 + X2 + X3 ≤ 300,000 portfolio
0.10X1 + 0.05X2 + 0.01X3 ≤ 0.05*300,000 portfolio risk
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,3
Solver Input Data
The Pfeiffer Company
Assigned to Market Revenue Growth
Quantity of
dollars 1 1 1 Max
Performance 0.2 0.1 0.06 0.36
26
Anderson Sweeney Willams. Métodos Cuantitativos para los Negocios. 7ma Edición. Editorial
Thomson. Page 317. Problem 19
27
Anderson Sweeney Williams. Quantitative Methods for Business. 7th Edition. Publisher
Thomson. Page 317. Problem 18.
Solution b):
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad de galones de vino blanco
X2 = Cantidad de galones de vino rosado
X3 = Cantidad de galones de jugo de frutas
Objective Function
Zmax = 2.5*(X1+X2+X3)–1X1–1.5X2 -0.5X3
Restrictions
X1 ≤ 10.000 maximum quantity of white wine
X2 ≤ 8.000 maximum amount of rosé wine
X1 ≥ 0.5(X1 + X2 + X3) maximum dosage of white wine
X2 ≥ 0.2(X1 + X2 + X3) minimum dosage of rosé wine
X2 ≤ 0.3(X1 + X2 + X3) maximum dosage of rosé wine
X3 ≤ 0.2(X1 + X2 + X3) fruit juice dosing
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,3
28. The programming manager of Channel 10 wants to determine the best way to
assign the time for the evening news broadcast from 11:00 to
11:30. Specifically, he would like to determine the number of minutes of time.
of broadcasting dedicated to local news, national news, the weather and the
sports. Throughout the 30 minutes of broadcasting, 10 minutes are reserved for
cloudiness. The broadcasting policy states that at least 15% of the time
available will be dedicated to covering local news the time dedicated to
local and national news should be at least 50% of the total time of
broadcast; the time dedicated to the weather segment should be less than or equal to
time dedicated to the sports segment; the time spent on
the sports segment should not exceed the total time dedicated to
local and national news; and at least 20% of the time should be dedicated
to the climate segment. The production costs per minute are 300 dollars
{"local_news":"200 dollars for local news,","national_news":"100 dollars for national news,"}
weather and 100 dollars for sports.
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = número de minutos para noticias locales
X2 = número de minutos para noticias nacionales
X3 = número de minutos sobre clima
X4 = número de minutos sobre deportes
Objective Function
Min Z = 300X1 + 200X2 + 100X3 + 100X4
Restrictions
X1 ≥ 15%(X1 + X2 + X3 + X4) local news time
X1 + X2 ≥ 50%(X1 + X2 + X3 + X4) local and national news time
X3 ≤ X4 weather news time
X4 ≤ (X1 + X2) time for sports
X3 ≥ 20%(X1 + X2 + X3 + X4) time for weather
X1 + X2 + X3 + X4 = 20 available time in minutes
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,4
MINUTES in
News National Locales Weather Sports
Quantity 1 1 1 1 Min
Costs 300 200 100 100 700
29. Gulf Coast Electronics is ready to award contracts for the printing of its
annual report. In recent years, a four-color annual report has
printed by Johnson Printing and Likeside Litho. A new company,
Benson Printing has inquired about the possibility of carrying out part of the
print. The quality and service level of Likeside Litho has been
extremely high; in fact, only 0.05% of their reports had to
be discarded due to quality issues. Johnson Printing has also had
a historically high level of quality, producing an average of only 1%
unacceptable reports. Since Gulf Coast Electronics has not had
experience with Benson Printing has estimated its defect rate at 10%.
Gulf Coast Electronics would like to determine how many reports will be needed.
prints by each of these companies, to obtain 75,000 reports of
acceptable quality. To ensure that Benson Printing will receive a part
the administration contract has specified that the number of reports
assigned to Benson Printing shall be at least 10% of the volume that is
assigned to Johnson Printing. In addition, the total volume assigned to Benson Printing,
Johnson Printing and Likeside Lithono must exceed 30,000, 50,000, and 50,000.
respective specimens. Due to the long relationship developed with Likeside
Litho, the administration has also indicated that Likeside Litho should be
assign at least 30,000 reports. The cost per copy is 2.45 dollars
for Benson Printing, 2.50 dollars for Johnson Printing, and 2.75 dollars for
Likeside Litho.
a. Formulate and solve a linear program to determine how many copies
each company printer should be assigned to maximize the total cost of
obtain 75,000 reports of acceptable quality.
b. Suppose that the quality level of Benson Printing is much better than that
Dear. What effect, if any, would it have?
c. Suppose that the management is willing to reconsider its requirement of
that Likeside Litho is given at least 30,000 reports. What effect, if any
Is there any, would this have it?
Solution:
Model formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = cantidad de ejemplares asignados a Litho
X2 = cantidad de ejemplares asignados a Johnson
X3 = cantidad de ejemplares asignados a Benson
Objective Function
Zmax = 2.75X1 + 2.5X2 +2.45X3
Restrictions
99.5%X1 + 99%X2 + 90%X3 ≤ 75,000 copies of good quality
X3 ≥ 10%X2 minimum allocation Benson
X3 ≤ 30.000 maximum assignment to Benson
X2 ≤ 50,000 maximum assignment Johnson
X1 ≤ 50,000 maximum allocation to Litho
X1 ≥ 30,000 minimum allocation to Litho
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,3
The formulation:
Given
X1= número de unidades del producto A para producción
X2 = number of units of product B for production
28
Sets, Matrices, and Linear Programming. Robert L. Childress
Subject to:
2X1 + 3X2 ≤ 120 (resource machine 1)
2X1 + 1.5X2 ≤ 80 (resource machine 2)
X1 ≥ 0 (no negativity)
X2 ≥ 0 (no negativity)
Input data for Solver
Solution: option b)
Solution a) b) c) d) e)
Z max 213.33 213.33 313.33 213.33 213.33
X1 20 20 25 15 20
X2 25 26.667 26.667 25 16.667
Given,
X1= número de toneladas de acero para producción de aleación
X2 = number of tons of chunk for alloy production
Analysis:
(1-10%)X1 + (1-20%)X2 ≥ 40
0.90X1+ 0.80X2≥ 40
Subject to:
2X1–X2≥ 0 (1)
1X1+ 4X2≥ 80 (2)
0.90X1 + 0.80X2 ≥ 40 (3)
X1 ≥ 0 (no negativity)
29
Sets, Matrices, and Linear Programming. Robert L. Childress
X2 ≥ 0 (no negativity)
Solution: option a)
Solution a) b) c) d) e)
Z max 1.440 1.440 144 1.440 1.044
X1 16 32 16 15 32
X2 32 16 26.667 25 16.667
next information about the hours required for the manufacturing of each
model and the capabilities of the factory departments.30
Man-Hours Required Capacity
Departments Model Z- Model Z- Departmental (hours
1200 1500 daily)
Dep. 1 2 0 300
Dep. 2 0 3 540
Dep. 5 2 2 440
Dep. 4 1 1/5 1 1/2 300
Contribution
per unit $ 50 $40
Problem formulation:
X1= Cantidad de unidades del modelo Z-1200
X2= Cantidad de unidades del modelo Z-1500
Función Objetivo: Maximizar Z = 50 X1+ 40 X2
Restrictions:
2 X1 + 0 X2 ≤ 300 by Dep. 1
0 X1 + 3 X2 ≤ 540 by Dep. 2
2 X1 + 2 X2 ≤ 440 by Dep. 5
1.2 X1+ 1.5 X2≤ 300 by Dep. 4
No negativity:
X i ≥ 0; i =1,2
Computer graphics solution (using the GLP)
30
Robert J. Thierauf and Richard A. Grosse. Decision making through Research
Operations. Limusa. Page 273
Input data
Output data:
Reddy Mikks produces paints for both interiors and exteriors from
from two raw materials, M1 and M2. The following table provides the basic data
from the problem:
Problem formulation:
Definition of variables:
X1= Número de toneladas de Pintura para Exteriores
X2= Número de toneladas de Pintura para Interiores
Restrictions
6 X1 + 4 X2 ≤ 24 for disp. Raw material M1
1 X1 + 2 X2 ≤ 6 for disposal. Raw material M2
0 X1 + 1 X2 ≤ 2 maximum daily internal paint.
-1X1 + 1 X2 ≤ 1 daily demand
No negativity:
X i ≥ 0; i =1,2
31
Handy A. Taha. Investigación de Operaciones. Una Introducción. Prentice Hall. Pag. 11
Output data:
Solution:
Answers
Industry a b c d e
Pint. Ext (ton) 1.5 3.0 3.0 1.5 3.5
Pint. Int (ton) 3.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 2.0
Earnings. max.($) 21,000 20,000 21,000 20,000 21.000
34. Ozark Farms uses 800 pounds of special feed daily. The feed
special is a mixture of corn and soybean, with the following
compositions:
The daily dietary requirements of the special food stipulate that for
less than 30% protein and at most 5% fiber. Ozark Farms wishes
determine the minimum daily cost of the feed mixture.32
Problem formulation:
Definition of variables:
X1= Cantidad de libras de Maíz
X2= Cantidad de libras de Semilla de Soya
32
Handy A. Taha. Investigación de Operaciones. Una Introducción. Prentice Hall. Pag. 18
Restrictions:
0.09 X1 + 0.60 X2 ≥ 0.30 * (X1 + X2) for proteins
0.02 X1 + 0.06 X2 ≤ 0.05 * (X1 + X2) by fiber
X1+ X2≥800 production
No negativity:
X i ≥ 0; i = 1, 2
Input data
Output Data:
Solution:
How should Jack allocate his time to maximize his satisfaction in both
Does it work like in the game?33
Problem formulation:
Definition of variables
X1= número de horas de juego
X2= número de horas de trabajo
Función objetivo: Maximizar Z = 2X1+ X2
Restrictions:
X1 + X2 = 10 availability of time
X2 is greater than or equal to X1
X1–X2≤ 0 work at least as much as he/she plays
X1 ≤ 4 game limit
No negativity
Xi ≥ 0; i = 1, 2
LPG solution
X2
33
Handy A. Taha. Investigación de Operaciones. Una Introducción. Prentice Hall. Pag. 18
Answers
Industry a b c d e
Play 1.5 3.0 3.0 4.0 6.0
Work 3.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 2.0
Maximum satisfaction 14.0 20.0 14.0 14.0 21,000
number of hours worked in the store. How many hours should he work in
each store?34
Problem formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = number of hours worked in store 1
X2 = number of hours worked in store 2
Restrictions:
X1 ≥ 5
X1 ≤ 12
X2 ≥ 6
X2 ≤ 10
X1 + X2 ≥ 20
No negativity
Xi ≥ 0; i = 1, 2
LPG solution
OptimalDecisions(x1,X2):(10.0,10.0)
1.0x1 + 0.0X2 >= 5.0
1.0x1 + 0.0X2 <= 12.0
0.0x1 + 1.0X2 >= 6.0
0.0x1 + 1.0x2 <= 10.0
1.0x1 + 1.0X2 >= 20.0
34
Handy A. Taha. Investigación de Operaciones. Una Introducción. Prentice Hall. Pag. 20
Solution:
Answers
Sector a b c d e
Store 1 11 10 10 10 10
Store 2 11 10 6.0 10 10
Minimum stress 14.0 20.0 14.0 140 21,000
Unit requirements
time (hours)
Departments Model Model S- Available hours in
S-1000 2000 the present month
From Main Structure 4 2 1600
Electric fencing 2.5 1 1200
Of Ensemble 4.5 1.5 1600
The contribution of model S-1000 is $40,000 per unit, and that of model S-
2000 is $10,000 per unit. Assuming that the company can sell
any amount of each of your products, due to the conditions
market favorable. Determine the optimal output for each model, the
highest possible contribution for the current month and the remaining time in the
three departments.35
Problem formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = número de unidades del modelo S-1000
X2 = number of units of model S-2000
LPG Solution
35
Robert J. Thierauf and Richard A. Grosse. Decision making through Research of
Operations. Limusa. Page 273
0
221 229 237 245 253 261 269 277 285 293 301 309 317 325 333 341 349 357 365 373 38
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(355.6,0.0)
4.0X1 + 2.0X2 <= 1600.0
2.5X1 + 1.0X2 <= 1200.0
4.5X1 + 1.5X2 <= 1600.0
Answers
Sector a b c d e
Model S-1000 255.5 355.5 355.5 350 350
Model S-2000 0.0 0.0 10.0 6.0 10.0
Maximum contribution 14.210 14,222.2 14.222,2 14.220 14,222.2
38. The Cincinnati Chemical Company must produce 10,000 pounds of a mixture
special for a client. The mixture consists of the ingredients: X1, X2 and
X3. X1 costs $8/pound, X2 $10/pound, and X3 $11/pound. No more than can be used.
3,000 pounds of X1 and at least 1,500 pounds of X2 should be used. Additionally
At least 2,000 pounds of X3 are required.
36
Robert J. Thierauf and Richard A. Grosse. Decision making through Research
Operations. Limusa. Page 274
No negativity
Xi ≥ 0; i = 1, 3
Solution:
Answers
Branch a b c d e
Ingredient X1 3.000 2,500 3,000 4,000 3.000
Ingredient X2 5,000 6.000 6,000 4,000 5,000
Ingredient X3 2.000 1.500 1.000 2.000 2.000
Minimum cost 96,000 69,000 69.000 96,000 69,000
Are there any leftovers? No If No Yes No
Product K 25 units
Product L 30 units
Product M 30 units
Product N 25 units
The production requirements and the available time for the week
next are:
Time
available the
Time required per product (hours)
next week
Departamento K L M N (hours)
Department1 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.25 400
Department 2 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.30 1000
Department 3 0.25 0.30 0.25 0.30 500
Department 4 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 500
Contribution by
unit $ 10.50 $ 9.00 $ 8.00 $ 10.0
Problem formulation:
Definition of variables
X1= Número de unidades del producto K
X2= Número de unidades del producto L
X3= Número de unidades del producto M
X4= Número de unidades del producto N
Objective function:
Maximize Z = 10.5X1 + 9.0X2 + 8.0X3 + 10.0X4
Restrictions
0.25X1+ 0.20X2+ 0.15X3+ 0.25X4≤ 400 Disp. Dep. 1
0.30X1 + 0.40X2 + 0.50X3 + 0.30X4 ≤ 1000 Disp. Dep. 2
0.25X1 + 0.30X2 + 0.25X3 + 0.30X4 ≤ 500 Disp. Dep. 3
0.25X1 + 0.25X2 + 0.25X3 + 0.25X4 ≤ 500 Disp. Dep. 4
X1 ≥ 25 Minimum sale of K
X2 ≥ 30 Minimum sale of L
X3 ≥ 30 Minimum sale of M
X4 ≥ 25 Minimum sale of N
No negativity
Xi ≥ 0; i = 1, 4
37
Robert J. Thierauf and Richard A. Grosse. Decision making through Research
Operations. Limusa. Page 275
Answers
Sector a b c d e
Optimal mix? Yes No If No Yes
Contribution act 18.433,2 16.856,5 16.556.0 16.856.5 16.500.0
Opt. contribution 16.856,5 18.433,25 14.055.0 18.500.0 14.500.0
Product K 976.5 976.5 906.5 950 976
Product L 30 30 25 30 30
Product M 957.5 957.5 975.6 956.0 950.0
Product N 25 25 30 25 35
Product
1 2 3 4
Wholesale selling price (40% of
discount $ 100 $ 150 $ 125 $ 140
Variable costs - Method A $ 80 $ 135 $ 120 $ 135
Variable costs - Method B $ 110 $ 150 $ 100 $ 110
Quantity that can be sold 1000 3000 4000 6000
The manufacturing section of the company has determined that the times of
manufacturing for each process is as follows:
Product
1 2 3 4
Method A
Department 20 3.0 3.6 2.0 3.5
Department 21 9.0 10.0 8.0 9.0
Department 22 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5
Method B
Department 31 4.0 4.0 2.0 4.0
Department 32 5.0 8.0 4.0 3.0
Department 20 15 000
Department 21 50 000
Department 22 8 000
38
Robert J. Thierauf and Richard A. Grosse. Decision making through Research
Operations. Limusa. Page 275
Department 31 10 000
Department 32 10 000
Problem formulation:
Definition of variables
X11= Número de unidades del producto 1 elaborados con el método A
X21 = Number of units of product 2 made with method A
X31= Número de unidades del producto 3 elaborados con el método A
X41= Número de unidades del producto 4 elaborados con el método A
X12= Number of units of product 1 made using method B
X22= Número de unidades del producto 2 elaborados con el método B
X32= Number of units of product 3 made using method B
X42= Número de unidades del producto 4 elaborados con el método B
Objective Function:
Maximize Z = (100-80)X11 + (150-135)X21 + (125-120)X31 +
(140-135)X41+ (100-110)X12+ (150-150)X22+ (125-100)X32+
(140-110)X24
Restrictions
X11 + X12 ≤ 1000 Sale of product 1
X21 + X22 ≤ 3000 Sale product 2
X31 + X32 ≤ 4000 Sale of product 3
X41 + X42 ≤ 6000 Sale of product 4
3.0X11+ 3.6 X21+ 2.0X31+ 3.5X41≤ 15.000 Hours Dep. 20
9.0X11 + 10.0X21 + 8.0X31 + 9.0X41 ≤ 50.000 Hours Dep. 21
1.0X11 + 1.0X21 + 0.5X31 + 0.5X41 ≤ 8.000 Hours Dep. 22
4.0X12+ 4.0X22+ 2.0X32+ 4.0X42≤ 10.000 Hours Dep. 31
5.0X12+ 8.0X22+ 4.0X32+ 3.0X42≤ 10.000 Hours Dep. 32
No negativity
Xij ≤ 0; i = 1, 4; j = 1, 2
Solution:
Contribution, $153,000.00
41. A factory produces two products, A and B. Each of them must be processed.
on two different machines. One machine has an available capacity of 24
hours and the other of 16 hours. Each unit of product A requires two hours
on both machines. Each unit of product B requires three hours on the
first machine and one hour in the second. The incremental utility is $6
for $5 per unit of product A and $7 per unit of product B, and the factory can
sell as many units of each product as I can manufacture.
Resumen:
Products Capacity of
Machines A B the machines
1 2 hours 3 hours 24 hours
2 2 hours 1 hour 16 hours
Utility in $ 6 7
Problem formulation
Definition of variables
X1= número de unidades del producto A
X2 = number of units of product B
Restrictions
2X1 + 3X2 ≤ 24 machine 1 capacity
2X1 + 1X2 ≤ 16 machine capacity 2
No negativity
Xi≥0 ;i=1,2
39
Bonini, Hansman, Bierman. Quantitative Analysis for Business. Ninth Edition. Irwin McGraw-Hill.
Hill. Page 43
7
: 2 X1 + 1 X2 = 16
5 : 2 X1 + 3 X2 = 24
3
Payoff: 6 X1 + 7 X2 = 64
2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(6,4)
: 2X1 + 3X2 <= 24
: 2X1 + 1X2 <= 16
Solution:
X1= 6
X2= 4
Z = 64
When gasoline is combined, the resulting mixture has an octane rating and a
vapor pressure proportional to the volume of each type of gasoline that is
mixed. For example, if 1,000 barrels of type 1 gasoline are mixed with 1
000 barrels of type 2 gasoline, the resulting gasoline will have an octane rating of 99:
1,000x5 1,000x9
7
2,000
Problem formulation:
Definition of variables
X1= número de barriles de gasolina Tipo 1, utilizada para gasolina de avión
X2= número de barriles de gasolina Tipo 1, utilizada para gasolina de carro
X3= número de barriles de gasolina Tipo 2, utilizada para gasolina de avión
X4= número de barriles de gasolina Tipo 2, utilizada para gasolina de carro
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,4
40
Bonini, Hansman, Bierman. Análisis Cuantitativo para los Negocios. Novena Edición. Irwin McGraw-
Hill. Page 46
Solution:
Z = 3,355,454.5
X1 = 7.272,72
X2 = 22,727.27
X3 = 1,818.18
X4 = 68.181,82
The factory has 120,000 hours of machining time and 160,000 hours.
of assembly time. Furthermore, it cannot have more than one million dollars in
inventory in process.
Summary:
Product Available
Process A B C D (hours)
Machining 2 hr 1 hr 2,5 hr 5 hr 120,000
Assembly 1 hr 3 hr 2.5 hr 0 hr 160,000
Inventory $10 $5 $2 $121 ’000.000
Utility $40 $24 $36 $23
Problem formulation:
Definition of variables:
X1 = Número de unidades del producto A
X2 = Número de unidades del producto B
X3 = Número de unidades del producto C
X4 = Número de unidades del producto D
Restrictions:
2X1 + X2 + 2.5X3 + 5X4 ≤ 120.000 machining availability
X1 + 3X2 + 2.5X3 + 0X4 ≤ 160.000 mounting availability
10X1 + 5X2 + 2X3 + 12X4 ≤ 1,000,000 inventory availability
X1 ≤ 20.000 sales limit product A
X3 ≤ 16.000 sales limit of product C
X4 ≥ 10.000 product D contract
No negativity:
Xi≥0 ;i=1,4
41
Bonini, Hansman, Bierman. Análisis Cuantitativo para los Negocios. Novena Edición. Irwin McGraw-
Hill. Page 57
Solution:
Z = 1’830.000
X1 = 10.000
X2 = 50,000
X3 = 0
X4 = 10.000
44. The U-Save Loan Company is planning its operations for the next year.
The company offers five types of loans, which are listed below, with
an annual return (in percentage) for her.
The legal requirements and the company's policy establish the following
limits on the amounts of the different types of loans.
Unsecured loans cannot exceed 10% of the total amount of the type of
Loans. The amount of unsecured loans and those for furniture cannot
exceeding 20% of the total type of loans. First-degree mortgages
they must be at least 40% of the total mortgages and, at least, 20%
of the total amount of types of loans. Second-degree mortgages do not
They can exceed 25% of the total amount of the type of loans.
Problem Formulation:
Definition of variables
X1= Monto en dólares para Préstamos Quirografarios
X2= Monto en dólares para Préstamos para Muebles
X3= Monto en dólares para préstamos para Automóviles
X4= Monto en dólares para Hipotecas de bienes raíces en segundo grado
X5= Amount in dollars for first-degree real estate mortgages
Objective function:
Maximizar Z = 0.15X1+ 0.12X2+ 0.09X3+ 0.10X4+ 0.07X5
Restrictions
X1 ≤ 0.10 (X1 + X2 + X3 + X4 + X5) limit on amount of unsecured credit.
0.90X1 - 0.10X2 - 0.10X3 - 0.10X4 - 0.10X5 ≤ 0
42
Bonini, Hansman, Bierman. Análisis Cuantitativo para los Negocios. Novena Edición. Irwin McGraw-
Hill. Page 58
No negativity
Xi≥0 ;i=1,5
Product A Product B
Selling price $60 $40
Incremental cost $30 $10
Incremental utility $30 $30
The two products are manufactured within a common process and are sold in
two different markets.
Problem formulation
Definition of variables
X1 = Número de unidades del producto A
X2 = Número de unidades del producto B
No negativity
Xi≥0 ; i=1,2
LPG solution
X2
11995 : 0.0 X1 + 1.0 X2 = 12000.0
11400
10805
10210
: 3.0 X1 + 1.0 X2 = 30000.0
9615
9020
8425
7830
7235
6640
6045
5450
4855
4260 : 1.0 X1 + 0.0 X2 = 8000.0
3665
3070
2475
1880
1285
690
95
30 428 826 1224 1622 2020 2418 2816 3214 3612 4010 4408 4806 5204 5602 6000 6398 6796 7194 7592 7990 X1
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(6000.0,12000.0)
3.0X1 + 1.0X2 <= 30000.0
: 1.0X1 + 0.0X2 <= 8000.0
0.0X1 + 1.0X2 <= 12000.0
43
Bonini, Hansman, Bierman. Análisis Cuantitativo para los Negocios. Novena Edición. Irwin McGraw-
Hill. Page 58
The production of sausages involves meeting two essential requirements for the
product. The percentage of protein, by weight, must be at least 15%, and the
fat percentage by weight must not exceed 30% (the remaining weight is
filler). The company has four raw materials available for the blend, with
the following characteristics:
Formulate the linear programming problem that will help the company to
determine the most appropriate mixing problem44
Problem formulation:
Definition of variables
X1= Cantidad en libras del ingrediente A
X2= Cantidad en libras del ingrediente B
X3= Cantidad en libras del ingrediente C
X4= Cantidad en libras del ingrediente D
Objective function
Minimize Z = 1.80X1 + 0.75X2 + 0.40X3 + 0.15X4
Restrictions
0.40X1 + 0.20X2 + 0.10X3 + 0.05X4 ≥ 0.15 proteins
0.10X1 + 0.15X2 + 0.35X3 + 0.40X4 ≤ 0.30 fats
X1 + X2 + X3 + X4 = 1 total pound of mixture
No negativity
Xi≥0 ;i=1, 4
44
Bonini, Hansman, Bierman. Análisis Cuantitativo para los Negocios. Novena Edición. Irwin McGraw-
Hill. Page 58
Problem formulation
Definition of variables
X1= Número de unidades de escritorios estándar
X2= Número de unidades de escritorios ejecutivos
Restrictions
0.8X1+ 1.2X2≤ 16 cut-off times
2.0X1 + 3.0X2 ≤ 30 assembly hours
0.6667X1 + 2.0X2 ≤ 16 pre-finishing hours
5.3334X1+ 4.0X2≤ 64 hours finished final
No negativity
Xi ≥ 0; i = 1, 2
LPG solution
45
Hans G. Daellenbach. Introduction to Operations Research Techniques. CECSA. Page 59
11
10
Payoff:40.000X1+50.000X2=559.998
7 :5.333X1+4.000X2=64.000
5
:0.667X1+2.000X2=16.000
4 :0.800X1+1.200X2=16.000
:2.000X1+3.000X2=30.000
3
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(9.000,4.000)
0.800X1+1.200X2<=16.000
2.000X1+3.000X2<=30.000
0.667X1+2.000X2<=16.000
5.333X1+4.000X2<=64.000
Problem formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad de Kg. de ingrediente Tipo 1
X2 = Cantidad de Kg. de ingrediente Tipo 2
No negativity
Xi≥0 ;i=1,2
Restrictions
100X1 + 200X2 ≥ 90 Nutrient A
80X1 + 150X2 ≥ 48 Nutrient B
40X1 + 20X2 ≥ 20 Nutrient C
10X1 + 0X2 ≥ 1.5 Vitamin X
46
Hans G. Daellenbach. Introduction to Operations Research Techniques. CECSA. Page 90
Problem formulation
Definition of variables
X1 = Tons of compound X
X2 = Tons of compound Y
47
Hans G. Daellenbach. Introduction to Operations Research Techniques. CECSA. Page 90
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,2
LPG solution
Payoff:500.0000X1+600.0000X2=6396.1630
8
7
:0.2500X1+0.1000X2=2.0000
:0.2500X1+0.5000X2=4.0000
3
0.0834X1+0.0834X2=1.0000
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(7.9808,4.0096)
0.2500X1+0.5000X2>=4.0000
0.2500X1+0.1000X2>=2.0000
0.0834X1+0.0834X2>=1.0000
50. The Palysafe Insurance Company of Knockville, ME, has idle funds for
a total of $20 million, available for short and long-term investments. The
government specifications require that no more than 80% of all the
investments should be long-term; no more than 40% should be invested in the short term; and
that the ratio of long-term to short-term investments not exceed 3 to 1.
Currently, long-term investments yield 15% annually; while
The annual rate for short-term investments is 10%. Consider this.
problem as a linear program with the objective of maximizing profit
weighted.48
Problem Formulation
Definition of variables
X1= Cantidad en millones de dólares para inversión a corto plazo
X2= Cantidad en millones de dólares para inversión a largo plazo
Restrictions
X1 + X2 ≤ 20 investment funds
X2 ≤ 0.80(X1 + X2)
0.80X1–0.20X2≥ 0 long-term investments
X2 ≤ 0.40(X1 + X2)
0.40X1 - 0.60X2 ≥ 0 short-term investments
X2/X1 ≤ 3/1
3X1 - X2 ≥ 0 relationship between investments
No negativity
Xi≥0 ;i=1,2
GLP solution
48
Hans G. Daellenbach. Introduction to Operations Research Techniques. CECSA. Page 90
X2
12
11
: 0.4 X1 - 0.6 X2 = 0.0
10 : 0.8 X1 - 0.2 X2 = 0.0
9
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 X1
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(12.0,8.0)
1.0X1 + 1.0X2 <= 20.0
0.8X1 - 0.2X2 >= 0.0
: 0.4X1 - 0.6X2 >= 0.0
: 3.0X1 - 1.0X2 >= 0.0
Composed of
Molding Assembly Finished molding Benefit
Model (h/unit) (h/unid) (h/unid) (gall/unid) ($/unid)
1 2.8 5 10 200 160
2 2.1 3 7.5 200 124
3 4 6 12 280 212
4 3 4 3 220 170
Capacity.
week 48 h 96 h 160 h 4800 gallons
Restrictions
2.8X1 + 2.1X2 + 4X3 + 3X4 ≤ 48 molding hours
5X1 + 3X2 + 6X3 +4X4 ≤ 96 assembly hours
10X1 + 7.5X2 + 12X3 + 3X4 ≤ 160 finishing hours
200X1 + 200X2 + 280X3 + 220X4 ≤ 4800 gallons for molding
49
Hans G. Daellenbach. Introduction to Operations Research Techniques. CECSA. Page 91
X4 ≤ 8
No negativity
Xi≥0 ;i=1,4
2 10 3 8 C2
Variable cost
/min ($) 0.40 0.50 0.24 0.30
Problem formulation:
Definition of variables
X1= número de unidades del producto A, con el proceso 1
X2= número de unidades del producto B, con el proceso 1
X3= número de unidades del producto B, con el proceso 2
X4 = number of units of product C, with process 1
X5= número de unidades del producto C, con el proceso 2
Objective function:
Minimize Z = 0.40(10X1 + 8X2 + 8X4) + 0.50(6X3 + 10X5) + 0.24(6X1 + 10X2
+ 16X4 + 3X5 + 0.30(3X1 + 9X3 + 8X5)
Minimize Z = 6.34X1 + 5.6X2 + 5.7X3 + 7.04X4 + 8.12X5
Restrictions
10X1 + 8X2 + 8X4 ≤ 480 machine X capacity
6X3+ 10X5≤ 480 machine Y capacity
6X1+10X2+ 16X4+ 3X5 ≤ 480 machine capacity S
3X1+ 9X3+ 8X5≤ 480 machine capacity T
X1 ≥ 36 demand for product A
X2 + X3 ≥ 45 demand for product B
X4+ X5≥ 10 demand for product C
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,4
50
Hans G. Daellenbach. Introduction to Operations Research Techniques. CECSA. Page 92
53. You are organizing a party and have the following amounts of
licor: 48 onz líquidas de whisky, 72 onz líquidas de vodka, 64 onz líquidas de
white vermouth, 72 ounces of red vermouth, 24 liquid ounces of brandy and 18 ounces
Coffee liqueur liquids. You plan to prepare the following drinks:
Chauncies, Black Russians, Sweet Italians, Molotov Cocktails (Russian Martins) and
Whiskey on the rocks. A Chauncy consists of 2/3 whiskey and 1/3 vermouth.
red. A Black Russian consists of ¾ vodka and ¼ coffee liqueur. An Italian
The sweet consists of ¼ brandy, ½ red vermouth, and ¼ white vermouth.
Molotov cocktails are a mixture of 2/3 vodka and 1/3 white vermouth.
Finally, the whisky on the rocks consists only of whisky. Each sip contains 4.
liquid ounces. Its purpose is to mix the ingredients in such a way that it can
prepare as many drinks as possible. However, you
consider that it is necessary to prepare at least double the Cocktails
Molotov from Black Russians, to provide a balanced selection.
Formulate it as a linear programming problem.51
Summary:
51
Hans G. Daellenbach. Introduction to Operations Research Techniques. CECSA. Page 94
Problem formulation:
Definition of variables:
X1= Número de tragos de Chauncies
X2= Número de tragos de Rusos Negros
X3= Número de tragos de Italianos Dulces
X4= Número de tragos de Cócteles Molotov
X5 = Number of rocks whiskey drinks
Restrictions:
2/3*4 X1 + 4X5 ≤ 48
2X1 + 3X5 ≤ 36 for whisky content
¾*4X2+ 2/3*4X4≤ 72
9X2+ 8X4≤ 216 for vodka content
¼*4X3 + 1/3*4X4 ≤ 64
3X3 + 4X4 ≤ 192 for the content of White Vermouth
1/3*4X1 + 2/4*4X3 ≤ 72
4X1 + 6X3 ≤ 216 for vermouth Red content
¼*4X3≤ 24
X3 ≤ 24 for Brandy content
¼*4X2≤ 18
X2 ≤ 18 for coffee liqueur content
2X2 ≥ X4
2X2 - X4 ≤ 0 relationship of Molotov cocktails/Black Russians
No negativity
Xi≥0 ;i=1,5
Solution:
54. ProTrac, Inc. produces two lines of heavy machinery. One of its lines of
products, called excavation equipment, is primarily used in
construction applications. The other line, called forestry equipment,
is intended for the wood industry. Both the largest machine in the line
of excavation (the E-9), as the largest of the entire line of forestry equipment
(the F-9) are manufactured in the same departments and with the same equipment.
Using the economic projections for the following month, the
Marketing Manager of ProTrac has considered that during that period
It will be possible to sell all the E-9 and F-9 that the company is capable of producing.
Management now has to recommend a production goal for the month.
next. That is, how many E-9 and F-9 should they manufacture if the ProTrac management
wants to maximize the contribution of the next month to the profit (that is,
contribution margin, defined as revenue minus variable costs
Resumen de datos:
HOURS
Maq. E-9 Mach. F-9 Total available
Dep. A 10 15 150
Dep. B 20 10 160
Test time 30 10 135 (150-10%)
2. Objective function
Maximize Z = 5000 E-9 + 4000 F-9
52
Eppen. Investigation of oppressions in administrative science. Prentice Hall. Page 69
Graphic solution:
{"Definiciones de datos para SOLVER y resolver":"Data definitions for SOLVER and to solve:"}
Model results:
55. The company Crawler Tread wants to mix iron ores from four mines.
different to manufacture bearings intended for a new Protrac product:
a medium-sized crawler tractor, the E-6, specifically designed for
competing in the European market. Through analysis, it has been shown that,
to produce a mixture endowed with the appropriate traction qualities,
minimum requirements must be met in relation to three basic elements
which, for simplification, we will refer to here as A, B, C. In specific terms,
each ton of ore must contain at least five pounds of the
basic element A, 100 pounds of basic element B and 30 pounds of the element
basic C.
The mineral extracted from each of the four mines contains the three elements.
basics, but in different quantities. These compositions expressed in pounds
per ton, are listed in the following table:
Problem formulation:
1. Definition of variables
T1 = fraction of tons from mine 1
T2 = fraction of tons from mine 2
T3 = fraction of tons from mine 3
T4 = fracción de toneladas de la mina 4
2. Objective function
Minimize Z = 800 T1 + 400 T2 + 600 T3 + 500 T4
3. Restrictions
10 T1 + 3 T2 + 8 T3 + 2 T4 ≥ 5 (element A)
90 T1 + 150 T2 + 75 T3 + 175 T4 ≥ 100 (element B)
45 T1 + 25 T2 + 20 T3 + 37 T4 ≥ 30 (element A)
T1 + T2 + T3 + T4 = 1 balance
T1, T2, T3, T4 ≥ 0 (no negativity)
53
Eppen. Investigation of oppressions in administrative science. Prentice Hall. Page 97
Results :
56. A company (ASTRO Y COSMOS) that manufactures TVs produces two models of
television sets, the star and the Cosmo. There are two production lines, one
for each model, two departments are involved in the production of each
model. The production line capacity of the Astro is 70 devices of
TV per day. The capacity of the Cosmo line is 50 televisions per day. In the
In department A, the cathode ray tubes are manufactured. This department requires
one hour of work for each Astro model and two hours of work for each
Cosmo model. Currently, a maximum of 120 hours can be assigned.
daily work for the production of both types of devices
Department A. In department B, the chassis is built. Here it is required
one hour of work for each Astro television and also one hour for each
Cosmo model. Currently, 90 hours of work can be assigned to
Department B for the production of both models. The contribution to the
profits are $20 and $10, respectively, for each Astro television and
Cosmo.
If the company knows that it can sell all the Astro and Cosmo devices that
be able to manufacture. What should the production plan be for each day (is
say, the daily production) for each model?54
Problem formulation:
Definition of variables
X1 = number of units of Astro TV
X2= número de unidades de TV Cosmo
LPG solution
54
Eppen. Investigation of oppressions in administrative science. Prentice Hall. Page 100
X2
40
38
36
34
32
30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12 : 0.0 X1 + 1.0 X2 = 50.0
10
8 : 1.0 X1 + 0.0 X2 = 70.0
6
4 1.0 X1 + 1.0 X2 = 90.0
2
0 : 1.0 X1 + 2.0 X2 = 120.0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 X1
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(70.0,20.0)
1.0X1 + 2.0X2 <= 120.0
1.0X1 + 1.0X2 <= 90.0
1.0X1 + 0.0X2 <= 70.0
0.0X1 + 1.0X2 <= 50.0
57. Of the many products that Arco Manufacturing Company produces, only the
products C, D, E, and F go through the following departments: brushing,
milling, drilling, and assembly. The requirements per product unit in
hours and contribution are as follows:
Department
Producto Cepillado Fresado Taladrado Ensamble Contr./Unidad
C 0.5 2.0 0.5 3.0 $8
D 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.0 $9
E 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 $7
F 0.5 1.0 1.0 3.0 $6
The available capacities this month for products C, D, E, and F, as
the minimum sales requirements are:
Department Capacity(hours) Product Minimum Sales Requirements
Problem formulation
Definition of variables
X1= Número de unidades del producto C
X2 = Number of units of product D
X3 = Number of units of product E
X4= Número de unidades del producto F
55
Thierauf. Decision Making through Operations Research. Limusa. Page 274
Restrictions
0.5X1 + 1.0X2 + 1.0X3 + 0.5X4 ≤ 1.800 brushing capacity
2.0X1 + 1.0X2 + 1.0X3 + 1.0X4 ≤ 2.800 Milling capacity
0.5X1 + 0.5X2 + 1.0X3 + 1.0X4 ≤ 3.000 drilling capacity
3.0X1 + 1.0X2 + 2.0X3 + 3.0X4 ≤ 6.000 assembly capacity
X1≥ 100 sale of C
X2 ≥ 600 sale of D
X3 ≥ 500 sale of E
X4 ≥ 400 sale of F
No negativity
Xi≥0 ;i=1,4
RENDIMIENTO
ANNUAL INVERSION
PRICE PER ESTIMATED FOR MAXIMUM POSSIBLE
ACTIONS ACCION($) ACCION ($) ($)
Gofer Crude 60 7 60,000
Can Oil 25 3 25,000
Sloth Petroleum 20 3 30,000
Problem formulation:
Definition of variables
X1= Número de acciones de Gofer Crude
X2= Number of Can Oil shares
X3 = Number of shares of Sloth Petroleum
No negativity
Xi≥0 ;i=1,3
56
Eppen. Investigation of oppressions in administrative science. Prentice Hall. Page 115
57
Eppen. Investigation of oppressions in administrative science. Prentice Hall. Page 117
Problem formulation
Definition of variables
X1= cantidad en dólares en Bonos de Tesorería
X2= cantidad en dólares en Acciones Ordinarias
X3 = amount in dollars in Money Market
X4= cantidad en dólares en Títulos Municipales
Restrictions
X1 + X2 ≥ 0.30(X1 + X2 + X3 + X4)
0.70X1+ 0.70X2–0.30X3–0.30X4≥ 0 30% investment
X3 + X4 ≤ 0.40(X1 + X2 + X3 + X4)
-0.40X1 - 0.40X2 + 0.60X3 + 0.60X4 ≤ 0 40% investment
X1 ≤ 5,000,000 investment in Treasury Bonds
X2≤ 7,000,000 investment in common stocks
X3 ≤ 2,000,000 investment in Money Market
X4≤ 4,000,000 investment in Municipal Bonds
X1 + X2 + X3 + X4 ≤ 10,000,000 total investment
No negativity
Xi≥0; i=1,4
58
Eppen. Research on Oppressions in Administrative Science. Prentice Hall. Page 114
No negativity
Xi≥0 ;i=1,4
Input data for Solver
Definition of variables
X1= Cantidad en libras de producto A
X2= Cantidad en libras del producto B
X3= Cantidad en libras del producto C
62. McNaughton, Inc. Produces two salsas for meat: Spicy Diablo and Red Baron.
smoother). This sauce is made by mixing two ingredients, A and B. It is allowed
certain level of flexibility in the formulas of these products. The percentages
permissibles, as well as the information on income and costs, appear in the
next table. It is possible to buy up to 40 liters of A and 30 of B. McNaughton
You can sell all the sauce you produce. Formulate a programming model.
linear whose objective is to maximize the net profits obtained from the sale of
these sauces.60
Restrictions
X1 ≥ 0.25(X1 + X3)
0.75X1 - 0.25X3 ≥ 0 content of A in the Spicy sauce
X2 ≤ 0.75(X2 + X4)
0.25X2 - 0.75X4 ≤ 0 content of A in the Red sauce
X3 ≥ 0.50(X1 + X3)
-0.50X1 + 0.50X3 ≥ 0 content of B in the Spicy sauce
X1 + X2 ≤ 40 maximum purchase of liters of A
X3 + X4 ≤ 30 maximum purchase of liters of B
No negativity
Xi≥0 ;i=1,4
60
Eppen. Investigation of oppressions in administrative science. Prentice Hall. Page 115
Solver Output
INGREDIENTS PRICE
(ONZ/BOTELLA) DEMAND SALE
HB01 HB02 HB03 BOTTLES / BOTTLE
Turmeric 4 2 1 1700 3.25
Paprika 3 2 3 unlimited 2.75
Availability
61
Eppen. Investigation of oppressions in administrative science. Prentice Hall. Page 115
Objective function
Maximize Z = 3.25X1 + 2.75X2 + 0.60(8000 - 4X1 - 3X2)
+ 0.70(9000–2X1–2X2) + 0.55(7000–X1–3X2)
Z = 14.950 - 5.45X1 - 6.95X2
Restrictions
4X1 + 3X2 ≤ 8000 for ounces of HB01
2X1 + 2X2 ≤ 9000 for ounces of HB02
1X1+ 3X2 ≤ 7000 by ounces of HB03
X1 ≤ 1.700 Turmeric bottles
X2 ≥ 600 contract for Paprika
No negativity
Xi ≥ 0; i = 1, 2
LPG solution
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(0.0,600.0)
: 4.0X1 + 3.0X2 <= 8000.0
2.0X1 + 2.0X2 <= 9000.0
1.0X1 + 3.0X2 <= 7000.0
1.0X1 + 0.0X2 <= 1700.0
0.0X1 + 1.0X2 >= 600.0
Solver Output
64. Guy Chung, superintendent of the buildings and the surrounding land of the
Gothic University has planned to apply fertilizer to the grass in the area.
quadrangular at the beginning of spring. That meadow needs at least the
quantities of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium listed in the following table:
There are three types of commercial fertilizer available; the analyses and prices for
1000 pounds are listed in the following table. Guy can buy any
amount of any fertilizers you want and combine them before
apply them to the grass. Formulate a PL model that determines the amount of
each fertilizer that you need to buy to meet the requirements with a
minimum cost.62
62
Eppen. Investigation of oppressions in administrative science. Prentice Hall. Page 116
65. The Ebel Mining Company owns two mines that produce a certain type
of mineral. These mines are located in different parts of the country and,
consequence, they show differences in their production capacities and in the
quality of your mineral. After the mineral is crushed, it is classified into three
classes depending on the quality: high, medium, and low. Ebel has been hired.
to supply weekly to the foundry plant of its parent company
12 tons of high-quality ore, 8 tons of medium quality, and 24
tons of low quality. It costs Ebel $20,000 a day to operate the first one.
I have $16,000 for the second. However, on the first day of operation.
I produce 6 tons of high-quality ore, 2 tons of medium, and 4.
tons down, while the second produces 2 tons daily of
high quality material, 2 medium and 12 low. How many days a week
each mine will have to operate to meet Ebel's commitments
most economical way possible? (In this case, it is acceptable to schedule the
operation of the mines in fractions of a day63
Definition of variables
X1= Number of days per week (fraction of a week) of work of
the Mine 1
X2= Number of days per week (fraction of week) of work of the
Mine 2
Restrictions
6X1+ 2X2≥ 12 high-quality mineral
2X1 + 2X2 ≥ 8 medium quality mineral
4X1 + 12X2 ≥ 24 low quality mineral
X1 + X2 = 5 maximum time 1 week (5 days)
No negativity
Xi≥ 0; i=1,2
63
Eppen. Investigation of oppressions in administrative science. Prentice Hall. Page 116
LPG Solution
0
0 2 4 6 8 10
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(1.0,3.0)
6.0X1 + 2.0X2 >= 12.0
2.0X1 + 2.0X2 >= 8.0
4.0X1 + 12.0X2 >= 24.0
1.0X1 + 1.0X2 <= 5.0
Mina
Production in Mine 1 2
Days of the week 1 1 MIN
Daily operating cost 20000 16000 36000
USE OF NO
RESTRICTIONS RESOURCES USED LIMIT USED
High mineral production c. 6 2 8≥ 12 -4
Medium mineral production c. 2 2 4≥ 8 -4
Mineral production down c. 4 12 16≥ 24 -8
Maximum time one week 1 1 2≤ 5 3
Mine Mine
Production in 1 2
Days of the week 1 3 MIN
Daily operating cost 20000 16000 68000
NO
RESTRICTIONS USED LIMIT USED
High mineral production c. 6 2 12≥ 12 9.32E-12
Medium mineral production
c. 2 2 8≥ 8 9.32E-12
Mineral production low c. 4 12 40≥ 24 16
Maximum time one week 1 1 4≤ 5 1
66. The Sally Solar Car CO. has a plant that manufactures sedan cars.
sports cars and trucks. The selling prices, variable costs and fixed costs
corresponding to the manufacturing of these vehicles are presented in the
next table:
Rally has recently received orders for a total of 100 sedan cars.
200 vans and 300 sports cars. You must attend to all of these.
orders. She wants to plan production in such a way that she can achieve the
break-even point as quickly as possible, that is, wants to ensure
that the total contribution margin equals the total fixed costs and that the
variable production costs are minimized. Formulate this problem as a
linear programming model and solve it.64
64
Eppen. Investigation of Oppressions in Administrative Science. Prentice Hall. Page 116
Solver Output
Definition of variables
X1 = Cantidad de unidades de Umidaire
X2 = Cantidad de unidades de Depollinator
65
Eppen. Research on Oppressions in Administrative Science. Prentice Hall. Page 117
LPG solution
:210.0X1+0.0X2=150000.0
Payoff:240.0X1+360.0X2=425546.2
X2
1000
950
900
850 1.0 X1 + 0.0 X2 = 500.0
800
750
700
650
600
550
500
450
400
350
300 : 0.0 X1 + 340.0 X2 = 240000.0
250
200
150
100
50
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950 1000 X1
OptimalDecisions(X1,X2):(714.3,705.9)
210.0X1+0.0X2>=150000.0
0.0X1 + 340.0X2 >= 240000.0
1.0X1 + 0.0X2 >= 500.0
Exit Solver
WORKING HOURS
Hectares AVAILABLE
FARM TOOLS PER MONTH
1 500 1700
2 900 3000
3 300 900
4 700 2200
In addition, the total number of hectares that can be dedicated to any crop
in particular are limited by the requirements associated with the concept of
blind team. In order to maintain a workload more or
less uniform among the different farms, the administration's policy
It is recommended that the percentage of planted hectares should be equal for
all the farms. However, on any of those estates, it can grow.
any combination of crops, as long as all are met
restrictions (including the requirement for the workload to be uniform). The
the administration wants to know how many hectares of each crop it will have to
Definition of variables
X11 = Cantidad de Ha del Cultivo A en la Granja 1
X12 = Cantidad de Ha del Cultivo A en la Granja 2
X13 = Cantidad de Ha del Cultivo A en la Granja 3
X14 = Cantidad de Ha del Cultivo A en la Granja 4
X21 = Cantidad de Ha del Cultivo B en la Granja 1
X22 = Cantidad de Ha del Cultivo B en la Granja 2
X23 = Cantidad de Ha del Cultivo B en la Granja 3
X24 = Cantidad de Ha del Cultivo B en la Granja 4
X31 = Cantidad de Ha del Cultivo C en la Granja 1
X32 = Cantidad de Ha del Cultivo C en la Granja 2
X33 = Cantidad de Ha del Cultivo C en la Granja 3
X34 = Cantidad de Ha del Cultivo C en la Granja 4
No negativity
Xij≥ 0; i=1,3; j = 1, 4
i = Cultivo; j = Granja
66
Eppen. Research on Oppressions in Administrative Science. Prentice Hall. Page 117
Exit Solver
that the mixtures A, B, and C be prepared. Formulate a PL model that takes advantage of
in the best way the available harvests and solve it.67
Harvest Price of
Mix 1 2 3 4 sale/gallon
A * at least 75% 2 and 3 when
in any proportion minus 8% 80
B * at least when
10% much 35% 50
C * At least 35% 2 and 3 *
in any proportion 35
Stock 130 200 150 350
gallons
* indicates that there are no restrictions
Definition of variables
X11 = Cantidad de galones de vino de la cosecha 1 para mezcla A
X12 = Cantidad de galones de vino de la cosecha 1 para mezcla B
X13 = Cantidad de galones de vino de la cosecha 1 para mezcla C
X21 = Cantidad de galones de vino de la cosecha 2 para mezcla A
X22 = Cantidad de galones de vino de la cosecha 2 para mezcla B
X23 = Cantidad de galones de vino de la cosecha 2 para mezcla C
X31 = Cantidad de galones de vino de la cosecha 3 para mezcla A
X32 = Cantidad de galones de vino de la cosecha 3 para mezcla B
X33 = Cantidad de galones de vino de la cosecha 3 para mezcla C
X41 = Cantidad de galones de vino de la cosecha 4 para mezcla A
X42 = Cantidad de galones de vino de la cosecha 4 para mezcla B
X43 = Cantidad de galones de vino de la cosecha 4 para mezcla C
Objective Function
Maximize Z = 80X11 + 80X21 + 80X31 + 80X41 + 50X12 + 50X22 + 50X32 +
50X42 + 35X13 + 35X23 + 35X33 + 35X43
Restrictions
X21 + X31 ≥ 0.75(X11 + X21 + X31 + X41) at least 75% of 2 and 3 in A
X41 ≥ 0.08(X11 + X21 + X31 + X41) at least 8% in A
X22 ≥ 0.10(X12 + X22 + X32 + X42) at least 10% in B
X42 ≤ 0.35(X12 + X22 + X32 + X42) at most 35% in B
X23 + X33 ≥ 0.35(X13 + X23 + X33 + X43) at least 35% of 2 and 3 in C
X11 + X12 + X13 ≤ 130 maximum of harvest 1 gallons
X21 + X22 + X23 ≤ 200 maximum of harvest 2 gallons
X31 + X32 + X33 ≤ 150 maximum of harvest gallons 3
X41 + X42 + X43 ≤ 350 maximum gallons of harvest 4
No negativity
Xij≥ 0; i=1,4; j = 1, 3
67
Eppen. Investigation of oppressions in administrative science. Prentice Hall. Page 118
i = Cosecha; j = Mezcla
Solver Output