SAMPLE ESSAY 2
Topic:
As computers can translate quickly and accurately with the development of technology,
learning foreign languages is a waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Understanding the Question:
Some people believe that with advanced translation technology, learning foreign
languages is no longer necessary. The task is to discuss to what extent you agree or
disagree.
Position:
Completely disagree. Machine translation cannot replace human communication, and
learning languages brings many benefits.
Detailed Outline:
1. Introduction
• Paraphrase the question.
• Clearly state opinion: I completely disagree with the statement.
Example: With the rapid advancement of technology, computer-based translation of
languages has become faster and more accurate than ever before. However, I completely
disagree with the idea that learning foreign languages is a waste of time, as language
learning brings both practical and intellectual benefits that machines cannot replace.
2. Body Paragraph 1 – Machines cannot replace human communication
• Translation tools are useful but cannot handle context, tone, and emotion.
• Real communication involves cultural understanding and emotional nuance.
• Example: Automatic translators often misinterpret humor or idioms, leading to
confusion.
3. Body Paragraph 2 – Learning languages has broader cognitive and social benefits
• • Learning languages improves memory, problem-solving, and multitasking skills.
• • Creates better job opportunities in the global market.
• • Promotes cross-cultural understanding and tolerance.
• • Example: Multinational companies prefer bilingual employees who can adapt to
diverse environments.
4. Conclusion
• • Summarize key reasons.
• • Restate strong disagreement.
Example: In conclusion, although translation technology is becoming more advanced, it
can never replace the deep understanding and personal growth that come from learning
a foreign language. Therefore, studying languages remains a valuable and essential
pursuit.