Introduction to Chemical Reactions Guide
Introduction to Chemical Reactions Guide
The conversion process of any raw materials to products could pass through a
number of steps. For illustration see the following schematic approach:
Raw 1 2 3 4 Wanted
materials products
Unwanted
products
Figure 1.1 Steps of the conversion process
The steps of a chemical process can be simple or complex, depending upon the
purity of the raw material, the desired quality of the products etc. The main objective of
the chemical reaction process is to secure quality of the wanted products with a minimum
cost of production.
In the chemical reaction process stated above, the steps 1, 3 and 4 are physical
treatments and are mainly carried out in unit operations. Step 2 is the chemical treatment,
which is carried out in the reactors. The cost of production depends on step 2. To ensure
good processing result of the chemical treatment under step 2, it needs:
The first question deals with thermodynamics. The second question deals with the
various rates of processes such as chemical kinetics, heat transfer and mass transfer. The
Thermodynamics in chemical treatment is concerned with two main aspects; namely, the
heat liberated (or absorbed) during reaction and the maximum attainable conversion.
Chemical kinetics is the study of the rate of reaction and mechanism. This is the main
concern in this teaching material and as such will be dealt with explicitly.
- Homogeneous Reaction
- Heterogeneous Reaction
- Simple
- Complex
- Catalyzed
- Noncatalyzed
- Reversible
- Irreversible
- Isothermal
- Nonisothermal
- Adiabatic
However, it should be well understood that one reaction may simultaneously belong to
classifications stated above. Example of reaction may be homogenous, simple,
3
In the process of balance, it takes a small volume of the reactor to observe what
happens there in the small interval of time. A material balance on any reactant species
can be drawn up through the following equations:
As a basis for further calculation, we select our system volume as represented in Figure
1.3
4
Fj,o Fj
Figure 1.3 Mole balance for a system volume
Conducting a mole balance on species j at any given instant of time which obeys
the following equation format.
dn j
F j ,0 − F j + G j = (1.3.1)
dt
where Fj,o - represents initial molar flow rates of species j, mol / time
Fj - represents final molar flow rates of species j, mol / time
Fj - represents the number of moles of species j in the system of time t.
G j - represents rate of formation at which a component is formed or disappeared
by reaction, and it is given by the product of the reaction volume, V and the
rate of formation of species j, rj
G j = r jV (1.4)
Suppose that the rate of formation of species j for the system volume varies with
the position in the system. That is, it has a value r j ,1 r j , 2 at location 1 and 2 respectively
which is surrounded by a small volume UV1 and UV2, where the rate of formation of
U G j ,1 = r j ,1 UV1 and U G j , 2 = r j , 2 UV2 respectively. Then, the total rate of formation
with in the system volume would be the sum total of all the rates of formation or by
taking the appropriate limits and following the definitions of integral, it can be expressed
for the rate of formation of species j as:
v
G j = ∫ r j .dv ( 1.4.1)
5
In actual, the subject of mole balance is concerned with the evaluation of this
integral replacing Gj in equation (1.3.1). Thus, substituting equations (1.4.1) to (1.3.1)
we get the basic equation of the mole balance for any chemical species j that is entering,
leaving, reacting and or accumulating within any system volume, v.
v dn j
F j ,0 − F j + ∫ r j dv = (1.3.2)
dt
Using this basis of equation, the design equation can be developed for various types of
industrial reactors. Of course one needs to find rj using chemical kinetics.
dn v
= ∫ r j dV
j
(1.5)
dt
The rate of formation of species j is uniform and is equal to the system average
rate, every where in the reaction, and therefore, we can take the rate of formation out of
the integral and can rewrite the equation of the mole balance in the form of :
dn j
= r jV (1.5.1)
dt
A Product
dn A
− = (− rΑ ) V (1.5.2)
dt
6
In this type of reactors, the chemical reactions occur while the reacting stream is
flowing through the reactor. The reaction is operated at steady-state and this means that
the variables such as concentration, temperature etc. at each point with in the system do
not vary with time. Thus equation (1.3.2) becomes,
v
F j , 0 = F j − ∫ r j dV (1.6)
In this type of reactors, due to continuous stirring, vigorous agitation takes place.
As a result, the contents are thoroughly mixed and the conditions through out the reactor
are the same and equal to the conditions at the outlet. For the same reason, the rate of
formation is constant through out the reactor. Therefore, the rate of formation can be
taken out of integral and the equation can be simplified as
v v
∫ r j dV = r j ∫ dV = r jV
F j , 0 = F j − r jV (1.6.1)
or
F j ,0 − F j
V = (1.6.2)
− rj
In this reactor type, the content of the reactor is perfectly mixed in the radial
direction. No mixing takes place in axial direction. This condition provides the
concentration, temperature, rate of formation etc to vary continuously in the axial
direction. Hence the material balance has to be applied to a differential element of
volume. This can be shown in the Figure 1.4
F in FA Δ V FA + dFA F out
UV ∼ dV
− dFA = − rA dV
or
dFA
(− rA ) = − (1.7.1)
dV
It can be seen that the changes in the composition of a reactor are of two types.
Our interest is to study the structure of chemical reaction chain in the reaction
chain of the reactor system. To understand the phenomena, let us take a well known
reaction,
N2 + 3H2 = 2NH3 (a)
Such type of equations can have two alternative meaning : kinetic and
stoichiometric explanation. In a kinetic explanation, it implies that one molecule of N2
combines directly with three molecules of H2 to form two molecules of [Link] terms of
stoichiometric description of the reaction means that the number of nitrogen and
hydrogen molecules combine to form ammonia in the ratio 1:3. It is clear that if a
reaction expression is true in a kinetic sense, it is also true in stoichiometric sense, but the
converse statement is not [Link] proportions 1:3 in the stoichiometric description are
absolutely definite and an equation such as 3N2 + 3H2 = 3NH3 is non existent.
Let us examine a typical chemical reaction, where the chemicals species present
in the reaction system be represented by the letters A1, A2 - - - - -- etc, assuming there are
other species present, represented by j = 1,2 - - - - - - S. A chemical reaction will not be
split into two sides of an equation, unless as in equation(a) above, are written on one side
and is set equal to zero as expressed below:
If we identify A1 with NH3; A2 with N2 and A3 with H2, then S=3 and the reaction
(b) can be expressed as:
2A1-A2-3A3 = 0 (c)
or
∑υ
s
j Aj = 0 (1.8)
j =1
υ υ υ
where 1 =2 ; 2 = -1 ; 3 = -3 is called the stoichiometric coefficient of Aj in the
reaction. The species with positive stoichiometic coefficients are the product of the
reaction and those with negative stoichiometric coefficients are the reactants. The
important thing to observe at this point is that the meaning of the reaction equation is
unchanged if it is multiplied by non-zero constant. The reaction -2 NH3 + 1 N2 +3H2=0
is multiplied by (-1), the same reaction with the decomposition of NH3, can be viewed
from the other side.
υ A A+ υ B B = υ C C+ υ D D
or
- υ Α A- υ Β B + υ C C+ υ D D =0
As per stoichiometric law, it is true that the change in number of molecules are directly
related to the stoichiometric number, thus
Δn A Δn B Δn C Δn D
= = =
υ A υ B υ C υ D
(1.9)
where Δn j = n j − n j , 0
Δn A Δn B Δn C Δn D
= = = =ϕ
υ A υ B υ C υ D
(1.9.1)
9
n j = n j ,0 + υϕ j (1.9.3)
Equation (1.9.3) expresses the variation of the amount of species j present during the
course of reaction. If j is limiting reactant (i.e. species present in least amount), the
maximum extent of reaction is found when all j is consumed, i.e. equation (1.9.3)
becomes,
0 = n j , 0 + j ϕ max υ (1.9.4)
n A − n A,O − ( n A − n A ,O ) n A, o − n A Δn A
ϕ=
− υ A
=
− (− υ A )
=
υ A
=
υ A
(1.9.5)
n A = n A, 0 − υ A ϕ (1.9.6)
where Δn A = n A,0 − n A
nC − nC , 0
ϕ=
υ C
(1.9.7)
nC = nC , 0 + υϕ
C (1.9.8)
n j ,0 − n j Δn j
Χj = = (1.10)
n j ,0 n j ,0
10
or in other word the conversion of XA is the number of moles of A that have reacted per
mole of A fed to the system,
Moles of A reacted
ΧA = (1.10.1)
Moles of A fed
n A, 0 − n j Δn A
ΧA = = (1.10.2)
n A, 0 n A, 0
Δn j Δn A
=
υj υ A
Δn j =
υ Δn A
υ
j
n j − n j ,0 =
υ (n − n A, 0 )
υ
j
A
A
n A, 0 − n A
ΧA =
n A, 0
υ (n − n ) = υ n Χ
A A
υ υ
j A, 0 A j
= A, 0 A
υ n Χ
A A
=n +
υ
j
nj j ,0 A, 0 A (1.11)
A
υ A+ υ υ C +υ D
B=
−υ
A B C D
n A = n A, 0 +
υ n Χ =n − n A, 0 Χ A
A
A, 0 A A, 0
A
−υ υ n
n B = n B ,0 +
υ n Χ =n −
υ ΧA
B B
A, 0 A B ,0 A, 0
A A
nC = nC , 0 +
υ n Χ =n +
υ n ΧA
υ υ
C C
A, 0 A C ,0 A, 0
A A
n D = n D ,0 +
υ n Χ =n +
υ n ΧA
υ υ
D D
A, 0 A D ,0 A, 0
A A
n I = n I , 0 ( Inerts)
υ (υ D +υC − υ A −υ B ) n
1
nT = nT 0 + A0 ΧA
A
or
υ Δυ n
1
nT = nT 0 + A0 ΧA (1.11.1)
A
where
Δ υ = ∑
υ − ∑
υ
pr υA r υA
Equation (1.11.1) expresses the change of total moles as a function of conversion for a
batch system. Stoichiometric equation can be illustrated in Table 1.1.
d d
n D,0 n A, 0 Χ A nD = nD,0 + n A, 0 Χ A
D a a
I (Inerts) n I ,0 - n I = n I ,0
⎛d c b ⎞
nT = nT ,0 + ⎜ + − − 1⎟n A,0 Χ A
⎝a a a ⎠
Progress Test 1.1 Write stoichiometric relationship for ammonia synthesis using
V2O5 as catalyst .
For several reactions, the total moles of the process can also be defined as
υi Χ
r
1
nT = nT 0 + n A0 ∑ Δ
υ A i =1
A ,i (1.11.2)
Using the above stoichiometric Table 1.1, we can express the concentration of each
component under conversion.
n A, 0 − n A, 0 Χ A n A, 0 (1 − Χ A )
CA = =
Vf Vf
⎡ n B ,0 b ⎤ ⎡ b ⎤
b
nB , 0 − n A , 0 Χ A n A , 0 ⎢ − X A ⎥ n A, 0 ⎢φ B − X A ⎥
a ⎢ n
⎣ A, 0 a ⎥
⎦ = ⎣ a ⎦
CB = =
Vf Vf Vf
⎡ nC , 0 c ⎤ ⎡ c ⎤
c
nC , 0 + n A,0 Χ A n A , 0 ⎢ + X A ⎥ n A, 0 ⎢φ C + X A ⎥
a ⎢⎣ n A, 0 a ⎥⎦ ⎣ a ⎦
CC = = =
Vf Vf Vf
⎡ n D ,0 d ⎤ ⎡ d ⎤
n D,0 +
c
n A, 0 Χ A n A, 0 ⎢ + X A⎥ n A, 0 ⎢φ D + X A ⎥
CD = a = ⎣⎢ n A,0 a ⎥⎦
= ⎣ a ⎦
Vf Vf Vf
n j ,0 C j ,0 y j ,0
where φ j = = = = ratio parameter
n A, 0 C A, 0 y A, 0
In such case,
nj nj
Cj = = (1.12.1)
V f V0
To determine concentration as a function of conversion, when there is no volume
change in the reaction, aA + bB → cC + dD , we proceed as,
14
n A, 0 − n A, 0 Χ A
CA = = C A,0 − C A,0 Χ A = C A,0 (1 − X A )
V0
b
n B ,0 − n A, 0 Χ A
a b ⎛ b ⎞
CB = = C B , 0 − C A, 0 Χ A = C A, 0 ⎜ φ B − C A, 0 X A ⎟
V0 a ⎝ a ⎠
c
nC ,0 + n A, 0 Χ A
a c ⎛ c ⎞
CC = = C C , 0 + C A, 0 Χ A = C A, 0 ⎜ φ C + C A, 0 X A ⎟
V0 a ⎝ a ⎠
d
nD , 0 + n A, 0 Χ A
a d ⎛ d ⎞
CD = = C D , 0 + C A, 0 Χ A = C A, 0 ⎜ φ D + C A, 0 X A ⎟
V0 a ⎝ a ⎠
C j = C j ,0 +
υ C A, 0 Χ A
υ
j
(1.13)
A
PV f = nT RT (1.15)
⎛P ⎞⎛ T ⎞ nT
V f = V0 ⎜ 0 ⎟⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ (1.16.1)
⎝P ⎠⎝ T0 ⎠ nT ,0
15
nT
nT , 0
= 1+ Δ υ nn A, 0
Χ A , for υ A =1 (1.17.1)
T ,0
nj n j ,0
yj = ; y j ,0 = (1.18)
nT nT ,0
Substituting to equation (1.17.1), we get
nT
nT , 0
= 1+ Δ υy A, 0 ΧA (1.17.2)
⎛P
V f = V0 ⎜ 0
⎞⎛ T
⎟⎜⎜
⎞
⎟⎟(1 + Δ υy A, 0 ΧA) (1.16.2)
⎝P ⎠⎝ T0 ⎠
ε =
Change in total number of moles when the reaction is completed
Total number of moles fed to the reaction
In symbols,
ε ⎛ d c b ⎞ n A, 0
= ⎜ + − − 1⎟ =Δ υy A, 0
⎝ a d a ⎠ nT ,0 (1.19)
For constant temperature and pressure equation (1.16.2), variable of volume becomes,
V f = V 0 (1 + εΧ A
) (1.16.3)
υ n Χ
n j ,0 +
υ C
C j ,0 + ΧA
υ υ
j j
A, 0 A A, 0
nj
V (1 + ε Χ )
Cj = = =
1+ε Χ
A A
(1.20)
Vf 0
A A
n A n A, 0 − n A, 0 Χ A n A,0 (1 − Χ A ) C A, 0 (1 − Χ A )
CA = = = =
Vf Vf V0 (1 + εΧ A ) 1+ εΧ A
b b b
nB , 0 − n A, 0 Χ A nB , 0 − n A , 0 Χ A C B , 0 − C A , 0 Χ A
n a a a
CB = B = = =
Vf Vf V0 (1 + Χ A ) ε 1 + ΧA ε
n c c
nC ,0 + C A, 0 Χ A nC ,0 +
n A , 0 Χ A CC , 0 + C A , 0 Χ A
C a a a
CC = C = = =
Vf Vf V0 (1 + Χ A ) ε 1+ Χ A ε
d d d
nD , 0 + n A, 0 Χ A nD , 0 +
n A, 0 Χ A C D , 0 + C A, 0 Χ A
CD a a a
CD = = = =
Vf Vf V0 (1 + Χ A ) ε 1+ Χ A ε
C n nI , 0 CI ,0
CI = I = I ,0 = =
Vf Vf V0 (1 + ε Χ A ) 1+ Χ A ε
FA,0 FA
FB,0 FB
Input Output
FC,0 FC
FD,0 FD
FI,0 FI
where ΔF j = F j − F j , 0 ; F j , molar flow rate, mole / time, and the conversion for
the flow system can be written as
F A , 0 − FA
ΧA = (1.22)
FA, 0
The form of the stoichiometric table for the flow system is identical to that of
a batch system except that we replace n j , 0 by F j ,0 and n j by F j . Taking A as a limiting
reactant we obtain the following stoichiometric table for the system of reaction:
aA + bB → cC + dD
FT = FT ,0 + Δ F υ X
A,0 A
(1.23)
18
This occurs mostly in liquid phase and in some gaseous phase, where the
number of moles of the product equals to the number of moles of the reactant. For
example, it can be seen in the water-gas shift reaction:
CO + H 2 O → CO + H
2 2
Fj Fj
Cj = = (1.24.2)
FV , f FV , 0
We can now express the concentration of A,B,C and D for the reaction:
aA + bB → cC + dD
FA F − FA,0 Χ A
CA = = A0 = C A, 0 − C A , 0 Χ A
Fv , f Fv , 0
b
FB ,0 − FA, 0 Χ A
F a b b
CB = B = = C B ,0 − C A,0 Χ A = C A,0 (φB − X A )
Fv , f Fv ,0 a a
c
FC , 0 + FA,0 Χ A
FC a c c
CC = = = CC ,0 + C A,0 Χ A = C A, 0 (φC + X A )
Fv , f Fv ,0 a a
d
FD , 0 + FA , 0 Χ A
FD a d d
CD = = = C C ,0 + C A, 0 Χ A = C A,0 (φ D + X A)
Fv , f Fv , 0 a a
19
Generally,
C j = C j ,0 +
υ C A, 0 Χ A
υ
j
(1.24.3)
A
Note that the same concentration expressions are also obtained as those for a constant
volume batch system, equation (1.13).
Using an equation of state (ideal gas) for total concentration at any point, we
get
FT P
CT = = (1.25.1)
FV , f RT
At the entrance of the system, it can be expressed as,
FT ,0 P0
CT , 0 = = (1.25.2)
FV ,0 RT0
⎛ F ⎞⎛ P0 ⎞⎛ T ⎞
FV , f = FV ,0 ⎜⎜ T ⎟⎜
⎟⎝ P ⎟⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ (1.26.1)
⎝ FT ,0 ⎠ ⎠⎝ T0 ⎠
Fv , f =
υ
FV , 0 FT ,0 + Δ Fv , 0 FA,0 Χ A ⎛ P0
⎜
⎞⎛ T
⎟⎜⎜
⎞
⎟⎟
FT ,0 ⎝P ⎠⎝ T0 ⎠
⎛ FA , 0 ⎞⎛ P0
= Fv ,0 ⎜⎜1 + Δ υΧ A
⎟⎜
⎟⎝ P
⎞⎛ T
⎟⎜⎜
⎞
⎟⎟
⎝ FT ,0 ⎠ ⎠⎝ T0 ⎠
⎝ ⎠⎝ 0 ⎠
or
FV , f = FV ,0 (1 + εΧ A
⎛⎞
)⎛⎜ P0 ⎞⎟⎜⎜ T
⎟⎟ (1.26.2)
⎝ P ⎠⎝ T0 ⎠
20
Now, for constant temperature and pressure, we can express the concentration of
species j for variable volume flow system as,
F j ,0 +
υ FA, 0 Χ A C j0 +
υ C Χ
υ υ
j j
⎛P ⎞⎛ T0 ⎞
A0 A
Fj
Cj = = = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟⎜ ⎟
(1 + εΧ )
A A
(1.26.3)
Fv , f FV , 0 A ⎝ P0 ⎠⎝ T ⎠
FA FA , 0 − F A , 0 Χ A C A , 0 − C A , 0 Χ A
CA = = =
Fv , f FV ,0 (1 + Χ A ) ε1+ ΧA ε
b b
FB , 0 − FA , 0 Χ A C B , 0 − C A , 0 Χ A
FB a a
CB = = =
FV , f FV ,0 (1 + Χ A ) ε 1+ Χ A ε
c c
FC , 0 + FA,0 Χ A C C ,0 + C A,0 Χ A
FC a a
CC = = =
FV , f FV ,0 (1 + Χ A ) 1+ ΧAε ε
d d
FD , 0 + FA,0 Χ A C D , 0 + C A,0 Χ A
FD a a
CD = = =
FV , f FV , 0 (1 + Χ A ) ε
1+ Χ A ε
Generally,
C j ,0 +
υ C ΧA
υ
j
A, 0
Cj =
1+ε Χ
A
(1.24.2)
A
It is to be noted that the concentration as a function of conversion for different
species expression for variable-volume flow system is represented in the same way as for
the concentration expression in the variable-volume batch system, equation (1.20). Figure
1.4 illustrate concentration of a reactant as a function of conversion for different system.
n j ,0
y j ,0 = (1.27.2)
nT , 0
n j = n j ,0 +
υ n j ,0 Χ A
υ
j
υ Δυ n
1
nT = nT , 0 A, 0 ΧA
A
υ y
y j ,0 + ΧA
υ
j
A, 0
=
A
yj (1.27.3)
υ Δυ y
1
1+ A, 0 ΧA
A
Progress Test 1.3 Considering C2H4 as a limiting reactant, write the mole
fraction as a function of conversion for the following reaction:
2C2 H4 + O2 → 2C2H4O
n j − n j0
ϕ=
υ j
n A − n A, 0 − (n A − n A,0 ) n A, 0 − n A
ϕ= = =
− υ A − (− υ A ) υ A
(1.9.5)
22
n A, 0 − n A
ΧA =
n A, 0
or
n A,0 − n A = Δn A = n A,0 Χ A
ϕ = n A, 0 Χ A (1.29)
Progress Test 1.4 Write mole fraction as a function to the extent of reaction for
ethylene oxidation.
Exercise 1.1 Sulphur dioxide is burned with air at 250C and 1 atm in the
following reaction
1
SO2 +
O2 → SO3
2
The initial mixture contains 7 % SO2, 10 % O2 and 83 % N2 as inert. Determine the
composition of the product in terms of mole fraction of X SO2 =0.85 %.
Solution
υ y
y j ,0 + ΧA
υ
j
A, 0
=
A
yj
υ Δυ y
1
1+ A, 0 ΧA
A
y j ,0 +
υ y A, 0 Χ A
υ
j
yj =
A
(E.1.1.1)
δ
23
υ υy
1 1 1
δ = 1+ Δ A, 0 ΧA = 1+ (− )(0.07)(0.85) = 0.97025 (E.1.1.2)
A 1 2
thus
y SO2 ,0 +
υ SO2
y SO2 , 0 Χ SO2
υ SO2 0.07 − (0.07)(0.85)
y SO2 = = = 0.0108
0.97025 0.97025
y O2 ,0 +
υ O2
y SO2 , 0 Χ SO2
υ SO2
1
0.01 − ( )(0.07)(0.85)
2
y O2 = = = 0.0724
0.97025 0.97025
y SO3 ,0 +
υ SO3
y SO2 , 0 Χ SO2
υ SO2 0 + (0.07)(0.085)
y SO3 = = = 0.0613
0.97025 0.97025
y N 2 ,0 +
υ SO3
y SO2 , 0 Χ SO2
υ SO2 0.83 + (0)(0.07)(0.85)
y N2 = = = 0.8554
0.97025 0.97025
Solution
PCH 4 PH 2O y CH 4 P y H 2O P y CH 4 y H 2O
K eq , P = 3
= 3
= 3
P −2 (E1.2.1)
P H2 PCO y H2 P y CO P y H2 y CO
b c d
A+ B→ C+ D
a a a
Batch Flow
FA FA, 0 (1 − Χ A )
CA = =
n A n A,0 (1 − Χ A ) FV , f FV , f
CA = =
Vf Vf FA FA,0 (1 − Χ A )
CA = =
FV ,, f FV , f
V f = V0 (1 + εΧ A
⎛
)⎜⎜ T
⎞⎛ P0 ⎞
⎟⎟⎜ ⎟
⎝ T0 ⎠⎝ P ⎠
FV , f = FV ,0 (1 + εΧ A
⎛
)⎜⎜ T
⎞⎛ P0 ⎞
⎟⎟⎜ ⎟
⎝ T0 ⎠⎝ P ⎠
Constant
Constant temperature &
temperature& presure
pressure
ε
V f = V0 (1 + Χ A ) FV , f = FV ,0 (1 + X )
A
ε
n A,0 (1 − Χ A ) FA, 0 (1 − Χ A )
CA = CA =
V0 (1 + εΧ A ) FV ,0 (1 + εΧ A )
C A,0 (1 − Χ A ) C A, 0 (1 − Χ A )
CA = CA =
1+ Χ ε A
1+ Χ ε A
To find the expression for mole fraction as a function of extent of reaction, we use
stoichiometric relationship,
nT = nT , 0 − 2ϕ (E1.2.3)
nCH 4 ϕ
y CH 4 = (E1.2.4)
nT nT ,0 − 2ϕ
nCO nCO , 0 − ϕ
y CO = (E1.2.5)
nT nT ,0 − 2ϕ
n H 2 n H 2 ,0 − 3ϕ
yH2 = (E1.2.6)
nT nT , 0 − 2ϕ
n H 2O ϕ
y H 2O = (E1.2.7)
nT nT ,0 − 2ϕ
Solving the equilibrium constant,
ϕ 2 (nT , 0 − 2ϕ ) 2
K equ , P = P −2 (E1.2.8)
(n H 2 − 3ϕ ) 2 (nCO ,0 − ϕ )
When more than one reaction takes place in the reactor system like,
CO + 2H 2 → CH 3 OH
CO 2 + H 2 → CO + H 2 O
It is more convenient to write the equation in terms of modified conversion, which can be
defined as follows:
τ j ,i =
ϕi
nT ,0
(1.30)
26
n j − n j ,0 n j ,0 − n j Δn j
ϕj = = =
υ υ υ
m ,i
j j j
where, Δn j m ,i - is the change of the mole of the main reactant in reaction i, then,
Δn j
τ j ,i =
υ nT , 0
i (1.31.1)
j
τ j ,i =
ϕi
V0
(1.31.2)
τ j ,i =
ϕi
mT , 0
(1.31.3)
Relationship between the modified conversion and the reaction conversion can be shown
as,
τ j ,i nT ,0 = ϕ i = n j ,0 Χ j for υj = 1
τ j ,i =
n j ,0
nT , 0
Χ j = y j ,0 Χ j (1.32)
Taking moles as a function of conversion for a single reaction, the expression of modified
conversion can be replaced by:
n j = n j ,0 +
υ n A, 0 Χ A
υ
j
υ y n Χ
A
= y j ,0 nT ,0 +
υ
j
A, 0 T , 0 A
A
⎡
= nT ,0 ⎢ y j ,0 +
υ y Χ⎤
υ
j
⎥ A, 0 A
⎢⎣ ⎥⎦
A
⎡
∴ n j = nT ,0 ⎢ y j ,0 +
υτ ⎤
υ ⎥
j
A (1.33)
⎢⎣ A ⎥⎦
27
⎡
n j = nT , 0 ⎢ y j , 0 + ∑
r υ τ ⎤
A ,i ⎥
j ,i
⎢⎣ L =1 υ A ,i ⎥⎦
(1.34.)
where, τ A,i - selected as reference reactant in the reaction i. It might be different for
different reactions; r number of independent reactions.
⎛ r
nT = nT ,0 ⎜1 + ∑
Δ υτ ⎞
⎟
υ
i
(1.35)
⎜ L =1 A ,i
⎟
⎝ A ,i ⎠
From the equations (1.34.) and (1.35), it is evident for several reactions that
r υ j ,i
y j ,0 + ∑υ
i =1
τ A, i
yj =
υτ
A ,i
(1.36)
r
Δ
1+ ∑
υ
i
A ,i
L =1 A ,i
Cj = C j ,0 + CT , 0 ∑
r υ τ
υ
j ,i
A ,i (1.37)
L =1 A ,i
r
P
( y j , 0 + ∑ υ j ,i )
RT
Cj =
υ
τ A ,i
i =1
(1.38)
r
Δ i
1+ ∑
L =1 υ A ,i
28
Exercise 1.3 Given that, for the synthesis of Methanol, the following reactions
take place:
CO + 2H 2 → CH 3 OH (1)
CO 2 + H 2 → CO + H 2 O (2)
5
The reaction is carried out at T = 493 K and P = 51x10 Pa with initial mole fraction of
y H 2O ,0 = 0.7438 ; y CO2 ,O = 0.1000 ; y CO ,O = 0.1180 ; and y In,0 = 0.0382 . The outlet
composition of the mixtures contain y CO = 0.1044 ; y CO2 = 0.0902 ; y H 2 = 0.7045 ,
y CH 3OH = 0.0414 ; y H 2O = 0.0181 ; and y In = 0.0413 . Using reference substances CO
and CO2, find modified conversion and conversion of CO and CO2.
Solution
The mole fraction of each species will be computed using equation (1.36)
r υ j ,i
y j ,0 + ∑υ
i =1
τ A, i
yj =
υτ
Ai
r
Δ
1+ ∑
υ
i
A ,i
L =1 A ,i
thus
y CO , 0 − τ 1
y CO = (E.1.3.2)
1 − 2τ 1 − 2τ 2
y CO2 , 0 − τ 2
y CO2 = (E.1.3.3)
1 − 2τ 1 − 2τ 2
y H 2 , 0 − 2τ 1 − 3τ 2
yH2 = (E.1.3.4)
1 − 2τ 1 − 2τ 2
τ1 + τ 2
y CH 3OH = (E.1.3.5)
1 − 2τ 1 − 2τ 2
29
τ2
y H 2O = (E.1.3.6)
1 − 2τ 1 − 2τ 2
y In, 0
y In = (E.1.3.7)
1 − 2τ 1 − 2τ 2
y CH 3OH τ1 + τ 2
= (E.1.3.8)
yH O 2
τ2
Taking equation ( E.1.3.7 ) and rearrange, we have
1 y In,0
τ1 + τ 2 = (1 − ) (E.1.3.9)
2 y In
1 y H 2O y In, 0
τ2 = (1 − ) (E.1.3.10)
2 y CH 3OH y In
y C H 3OH
τ1 = τ 2 ( − 1) (E.1.3.11)
y H 2O
1 0.0184 0.0383
τ2 = ( )(1 − ) = 0.01668
2 0.0414 0.0413
0.0414
τ 1 = 0.01668( − 1) = 0.02147
0.0181
The relationship between conversion and modified conversion is given by equation (1.32)
X =
n j ,0
τ =
τ j ,i
j ,i
j nT ,0 y j ,0
30
thus,
X CO =
τ 1
=
0.02147
= 0.1819
y CO ,0 0.1180
X CO2 =
τ 2
=
0.01668
= 0.1668
y CO2 ,0 0.1000
aA + bB → cC + dD (1)
gA + fC → eE (2)
A form of modified equation ( 1.34) expresses the number of moles of species j at any
time
υ
r
n j = n j , 0 + n A, 0 ∑ j ,i Xi (1.41)
L =1
where, υ ji is the stoichiometric coefficients for species j in the ith - reaction and Xi is the
conversion for ith - reaction i. Equation (1.41) can be used to develop the stoichiometric
relationship for the above multiple reactions. This is given in Table 1.4
nj
Cj =
Vf
31
nT ⎛P ⎞⎛ T ⎞
Vf = V0 ⎜ 0 ⎟⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
nT ,0 ⎝ P ⎠⎝ T0 ⎠
nT n
= T ,0 + Δ
nT ,0 nT ,0 1
υ
n A, 0
nT ,0
Χ A,1 + Δ
2
n A, 0
nT ,0
Χ A, 2 υ
= 1 + Δυ y A, 0 Χ A,1 + Δυ y A, 0 Χ A, 2
1 2
+τ Χ τ2 Χ
nT
= 1 A,1 + A, 2
nT , 0 1
aA + bB → cC + dD (1)
gA + fC → eE (2)
Moles
initially
present Change in mole Remaining Mole in the system at time t
− (n A, 0 Χ A,1 + n A,0 X A, 2 )
A n A, 0 nA = nA, 0 − nA, 0 Χ A,1 − nA, 0 Χ A, 2
−b b
n B,0 n A,0 Χ A,1 nB = nB0 − n A,0 Χ A,1
B a a
c f
nA, 0 Χ A,1 − nA,0 Χ A, 2
a g c f
nC = nC , 0 + n A,0 Χ A,1 − n A,0 Χ A, 2
C nC , 0 a g
d d
n D,0 n A, 0 Χ A,1 n D = n D , 0 + n A,0 Χ A,1
D a a
Error! Objects cannot e
be created from editing n E = n E , 0 + n A, 0 Χ A, 2
E n E ,0 field codes. g
I (Inerts) n I ,0 - n I = n I ,0
V f = V 0 (1 + τ1 Χ A ,1 + τ2 Χ A,2 ) (1.42)
32
C A,0 ( 1 − Χ A,1 − Χ A, 2 )
CA =
1 + τ1 Χ A,1 + τ2 Χ A, 2
(1.43)
Analogy
b
C A, 0 ( φ B −
Χ A,1 )
CB = a
1 + Χτ
1 A,1
+ Χ
2 A, 2
τ
c f
C A, 0 ( φ C +Χ A,1 − Χ A, 2 )
a g
CC =
1 + τ
Χ
1 A,1
+ Χ
2 A, 2
τ
d
C A, 0 ( φ D +
Χ A,1 )
CD = a
1 + Χτ
1 A,1
+ Χ
2 A, 2
τ
e
C A, 0 ( φ E +
Χ A, 2 )
g
CE =
1 + Χτ
1 A,1
+ Χτ
2 A, 2
C j ,0
where, φ j =
C A, 0
Invariably, in a reaction from a reactant, both the desired and undesired products are
obtained simultaneously. For an example,
In the complexity of such types of reactions, only conversion factor is not important but
to have the reaction to be controlled through two parameters i.e., selectivity and yield.
33
1.4.1 Selectivity
nP
SP = (1.44.1)
nΧ
SP =
υ nP
υ (n
A ,i
A, 0 − n P )
(1.44.2)
P
Δn A
SP = m
(1.44.3)
Δn A
Equation is simply derived from stoichiometric relationship and it is our interest. Let us
develop the stoichiometric relationship for the following complex reactions :
υ A ,1 A→ υP P desired
υ A, 2 A →υ Χ Χ
product (1)
undesired
Product (2)
Δn A,1 Δn P
=
− υ A,1 υ P
where, Δn A = n A − n A,0 ; Δn P = n p − n p ,0
34
Δn A,1 = − υ υ
Δn
A,1
P
P
Introduction to Chemical Reaction
(n − n A, 0 ) 1 = −
υ Δn P
υ
A,1
A
P
(−n + n A, 0 ) 1 =
υ Δn p
υ
A,1
A
P
Δn A =
υ Δn p
υ
A,1
m
(1.45)
P
Substituting equation (1.45) in to equation (1.44.3) we have the combination equation for
selectivity,
SP =
Δn A
=
υ A,1 Δn P
=
υ (n
A,1 − n P ,0 )
υ υ (n
m P
− nA )
(1.46.1)
Δn A P Δn A P A, 0
SP =
υ nP
υ (n
A,1
A, 0 − n A )
(1.47)
P
1.4.2 Yield
It refers to the amount of a specific product formed in a given reaction process per
mole of entering reactant.
A → P
Υp =
υ A,1 np
υ P n A, 0
(1.48)
It should be noted that both the selectivity and yield vary between 0 and 1. Both
factors are considered when complex reactions take place and where reactions are
competing with each other. However, in the reactor's product separation section, the key
reactant A can be recovered and recycled to the reactor section, where the selectivity
35
which is based on the amount of reactant A converted in the reactor. It is the key factor
in the economic operation of the plant.
If on the other hand, reactant A cannot be recovered from the product stream and
the non-converted A is wasted in the operation, then the yield, which is based on the
amount of feed, is the economic factor. Yield and selectivity are usually more important
than total conversion for complex reaction systems. The relationship between these
parameters is described in the following equations.
From the equations (1.48) and (1.46.1) for equal stoichiometric coefficient of
reactant and product by combining and rearranging the equations gives us,
nP np np
ΥP = and S P = =
n A, 0 n A, 0 − n A Δn A
S P Δn A S P (n A, 0 − n A )
ΥP = =
n A, 0 n A, 0
ΥP = S P Χ (1.49)
YP = Χ A
(1.50)
S P = 1
1.0
SP
0.5 ΥP
0 0.5 1
36
Problems
P1.1 Soap is composed of the sodium and potassium salts of various fatty
acids such as oleic, stearic, palmitic, and myristic acids. The saponification for the
formation of soap from aqueous caustic soda and glyceryl stearate is
i) 20 %
ii) 90 %
P1.2 A mixture of 28% SO2 and 72% air is charged to a flow reactor in
which SO2 is oxidized for sulphuric acid production,
2SO2 + O2 → 2SO3
Taking SO2 as the base of calculation for the case when the total pressure is 1485 K Pa
and the temperature is constant at 227oC express:
H2O → H2 + ½ O2
37
Find expression which relate the mole fraction of each chemical species & conversion of
H2O to the extent of reaction.
Filename: cha1
Directory: C:\Documents and Settings\Teme\Desktop\Lecture
Notes\yo\Kinetics Lecture
Template: C:\Documents and Settings\Teme\Application
Data\Microsoft\Templates\[Link]
Title: 1
Subject:
Author: cbc
Keywords:
Comments:
Creation Date: 5/1/2005 4:28:00 PM
Change Number: 15
Last Saved On: 7/17/2005 4:08:00 PM
Last Saved By: cbc
Total Editing Time: 197 Minutes
Last Printed On: 3/25/2010 3:14:00 AM
As of Last Complete Printing
Number of Pages: 37
Number of Words: 6,485 (approx.)
Number of Characters: 36,965 (approx.)