Employee Rewards & Recognition

HR Policy: QSP-HR-026

POLICY TITLE: Rewards and Recognition Policy

EFFECTIVE FROM 18-September-2025

VALIDITY The policy is valid till the following review

DRAFTED/MODIFIED BY Ms. Urvashi Jha

VALIDATED BY Mr. Ram K, DGM-HR

APPROVED BY

Mr. Ram K, DGM-HR

Date of Description of
Ver. No. Authored / Revised By Reviewed By Approved By
Revision Change

S. Raghunathan/
1 01/01/20 Implemented Sudeshna Pal / Ruchi Soban Bisht Soban Bisht
Ahuja

2 01/01/21 Process change Purba Maity Sushil Ekka Sushil Ekka

Revamped Structure Ajay Singh Sushmita

3 01/01/23 Priyanka Banerjee
of the Star Awards Shekhawat Choudhury
Ajay Singh Ajay Singh
4 12/03/25 The Star Awards – Urvashi Jha
Shekhawat Shekhawat
New Categories
Introduced &
5 18/09/25 Urvashi Jha Ram K Ram K
Structural
Enhancements

Page 1 of
 Employee Rewards & Recognition
HR Policy: QSP-HR-026

The Rewards and Recognition (R&R) Policy of Pinnacle Infotech Solutions is designed to motivate and
acknowledge the exceptional efforts of our employees in various functions and capacities, whose individual or
team performances significantly contribute to the company's overall objectives and business performances.

The R&R scheme is revamped, and the recognition program is renamed “STAR AWARDS,” introducing a variety of
awards tailored to the significance of the contributions.

A. OBJECTIVE:
The scheme is designed to provide a continuum of opportunities:
▪ To encourage a performance-driven culture
▪ To recognize the outstanding contribution/effort by an individual/team based on their contributions.
▪ To motivate employees towards achieving success, fostering a culture of mutual respect, and
building a positive work environment.

B. SCOPE & ELIGIBILITY:

The scope aims to cover all employees across all PIS employees. It is conducted bi-annually.

The R&R Framework is designed to recognize and acknowledge the performance of the employees at:
▪ Business Excellence
▪ People and Culture

C. REWARD CATEGORIES AND DEFINITIONS:

The winning Reward is a one-time monetary award along with a certificate for significant outstanding
performance in areas identified and defined. Every reward category is specified along with the nomination
criteria and validation checks for final selection. (Refer to the annexure- R&R matrix)

The R&R matrix provides information regarding the target groups/individuals (achievers), the qualifying
criteria, and the reward quantum.

D. OPERATIVE GUIDELINES:

I) Nomination Process:
▪ Individuals or Managers from all departments and functions can nominate themselves or their team
members through the Web Portal (BPMS Portal R&R section)
▪ Nomination can be in not more than two categories.
▪ Supporting Documents must be furnished against each Award Category for proper validation.
▪ The nominations must be submitted in the BPMS portal, which will be enabled across locations. The
announcement for nomination will follow through.

II) Validation and Evaluation:

All nominations are validated by the designated departments according to the applicable qualifying
criteria. The final filtered/shortlisted list of awardees is presented to the Evaluation Committee (Jury
Members), and the final names are selected.

Page 2 of
 Employee Rewards & Recognition
HR Policy: QSP-HR-026

III) Guiding Principles:

The R&R policy will be guided in its design and implementation by the following principles:
▪ The policy reinforces individual accountability and contribution to PIS’ achievements and results.

▪ Consistent and meaningful evaluation processes drive the policy to determine the transparency of
relevant and specific rewards and sanctions.

▪ The policy focuses on formal recognition and reward measures. It will neither specify nor abolish
other informal ways of appreciation and encouraging good behavior and results (such as regularly
providing relevant and timely feedback, Appreciation Cards, etc.).

▪ The policy will be fair and transparent. HR will maintain the confidentiality of the nominations and
announce the results to the nominees who will be present at the R&R ceremony to receive the
awards.

▪ In case of any absence of awardees during the R&R program event, the award will not be entertained
after the ceremony. Both the certificates and the prize money will be forfeited in such circumstances.

IV) Award Distribution:

▪ The list of winners in each reward category is handed over to the Accounts Department after the
program.
▪ The prize (award) money is credited to the account of the respective winners in each category.

E. POWER TO AMEND:
HR / Management reserves the right to change or discontinue any/all provision(s) of this directive,
including but not limited to the entitlement and procedure, at any point in time. This policy is subject to
periodic review and amendments to align with the company's evolving goals and objectives.

In the event of confusion or opinions of a diverse nature concerning the interpretation of one or any part
of the Star Awards program, including its implementation, the opinion provided by HR head /
Management will be considered final and conclusive.

-x-

Page 3 of
 Employee Rewards & Recognition
HR Policy: QSP-HR-026

R&R STAR AWARDS

CATEGORY 1: BUSINESS EXCELLENCE
Total no.
NOMINATED BY
of Awards
Sl. Selection Criteria & Weightage (Total weightage Frequency of
REWARD NAME Definitions Division Break up Supporting Documents / Data Required Validated by PIS Tenure
No All Self/PDH/ is 100) Award
Locations Organization/Peer

This award recognizes

individuals who demonstrate
exceptional skill in negotiating
business terms, building client 1. No of meetings done in a project in 6 months
1. No of meetings done in a project in 6
The Strategic trust, and driving agreements BSD (30)
1 3 Winner SELF & PDH months HOD All Tenure Twice a year
Negotiator Award that create win-win outcomes (Estimation) 2. Value of project in 6 months (40)
2. Value of the project in 6 months
for both the organization and 3. Risk nature of client (30)
the client. It celebrates
strategic thinking, relationship-
building, and value creation.
1. Number of new clients achieved (40)
Recognizes the BD professional 2. Highest revenue % achieved in the last 6
The Consistency who maintains reliable Self, Peer, 1. Meetings done in last 6 months months (30)
2 3 BD Winner BD Manager All Tenure Twice a year
Champion Award performance in achieving Manager 2. Number of new clients onboarded 3. Highest number of meetings fixed in the last 6
targets month after month. months (30)
1. Number of new clients achieved (40)
Celebrating the powerhouse
2. Highest revenue % achieved in last 6 months
The Titan of Closures performer who achieves Self, Peer, 1. Meetings done in last 6 months
3 3 BD Winner BD Manager All Tenure (30) Twice a year
Award unmatched success in new Manager 2. Number of new clients onboarded
3. Highest number of meetings fixed in last 6
client acquisitions.
months (30)
Recognizes employees who Winner of 1st
Place 1. Client Feedback /Appreciation Email from
have significantly contributed
client/ RM Feedback (40)
to new client acquisition, client Winner of 2nd 1. Work completion percentage in 6 months
The Client Champion 2. Revenue Score (20)
4 satisfaction, and revenue 9 BIM Place SELF (PM's only) (logged hr/assigned hrs) R&D, COE All Tenure Twice a year
Award 3. No. of Headcount in the projects in last 6
growth through effective 2. % invoice of total contract amount
Winner of 3rd months (20)
collaboration and exceptional
Place 4. Avg. COE audit score (20)
delivery.

This award recognizes the top Winner

performer from R&D, COE, BSD
Winner Note: A detailed nomination write-up is
Estimation, and BED teams who
mandatory to support the application,
5 The Trailblazer Award leads the way with innovation, 12 HOD Jury Members > 1 Yrs PIS Exp Department Heads Feedback Twice a year
highlighting achievements, contributions, and
accuracy, and measurable Winner
impact(100 words mandatory)
impact, setting new BED
benchmarks for excellence. Winner

Honoring an employee whose

Winner
innovative spirit and 1. Reports on the successful and timely
The Horizon Award SELF, OSD > 3 months at
6 extraordinary efforts have led 6 BIM completion of orders on OSD Jury Members FH Feedback Twice a year
(OSD) Manager OSD site
to the successful completion of 2 Feedback from the Client site
Winner
assignments at the client site.
Presented to the design
1. Client Feedback /Appreciation from client (40)
engineer who has consistently
1. No. of projects involved 2. Revenue Score (20)
7 Best Design Engineer managed and executed the 3 BIM - Design Winner Self/PDH/FH R&D, COE, PDH All Tenure Twice a year
2. Timely completion of projects 4. Avg. COE audit score (20)
highest number of project
5. PDH Feedback (20)
orders on schedule.

Page 4 of
 Employee Rewards & Recognition
HR Policy: QSP-HR-026

R&R STAR AWARDS

CATEGORY 1: BUSINESS EXCELLENCE
Total no.
NOMINATED BY
of Awards
Sl. Selection Criteria & Weightage (Total weightage Frequency of
REWARD NAME Definitions Division Break up Supporting Documents / Data Required Validated by PIS Tenure
No All Self/PDH/ is 100) Award
Locations Organization/Peer

For R&D professionals who

Note: A detailed nomination write-up is
develop forward-looking
Pinnacle Excellence in mandatory to support the application,
8 innovations that prepare the 3 R&D Winner Self, PDH, Peer HOD > 1 Yrs PIS Exp HOD Feedback Twice a year
Innovation Award highlighting achievements, contributions, and
organization for tomorrow’s
impact.(200 words mandatory)
success.
Winner of 1st
Award recognizes the Place 1. Timely completion of major projects 2. New 1. Feedback of FH/HOD (50)
BIM, CAD
employee for his/her best work Winner of 2nd initiatives undertaken 2. HR - A+ Ratings (50)
over the years through Place
FH/HOD, HR &
9 The Trend Setter consistent performance and 12 SELF, Peer > 2 years 1. Feedback of FH/HOD (50) Twice a year
BSD Winner Jury members
best professional practices. The 2. HR - A+ Ratings (50)
1. No. of new initiatives taken and executed
one who is looked up to by
successfully 1. Feedback of FH/HOD (50)
fellow employees. BED Winner
2. HR - A+ Ratings (50)

>2Yrs to ≤5Yrs
Winner
PIS Exp. 1. [Link] automation tools utilized in the projects
This award celebrates in last 6 months - Feedback from PiVDC team
employees who successfully Production 1. Number of automation tools utilized in the >5Yrs to ≤8 Yrs (35)
Winner SELF & PDH
implement process (BIM & CAD) projects in last 6 months PIS Exp. 2. No. of HIT counts used to implement the
Process Improvement Department
10 improvements or new 12 2. No. of HIT counts used to implement the projects - Feedback from PiVDC team (35) Twice a year
Excellence Award Head, R&D
technologies that contribute to projects 3. PDH Feedback (30)
Winner >8 Yrs PIS Exp.
operational excellence and 3. PDH Feedback
sustainable business growth.
BSD (except
All Tenure
R&D) BED & Winner SELF & Manager Manager's Feedback (100)
(Estimation)
Estimation

Projects undertaken where there was

This award will be given to the
Winner of 1st involvement of active participation in client/ ≥2Yrs to ≤4 Yrs
employee who demonstrates
Place internal stakeholder communication PIS Exp.
outstanding communication
Communication Production
11 skills with clients and internal 6 SELF & PDH Jury Members Jury Members Twice a year
Excellence Award (BIM & CAD) Note: A detailed nomination write-up is
stakeholders, ensuring clarity,
mandatory to support the application,
collaboration, and effective Winner of 2nd ≥2Yrs to ≤4 Yrs
highlighting achievements, contributions, and
grievance resolution. Place PIS Exp.
impact.(200 words mandatory)

Winner ≤2 yrs PIS Exp.

This reward will be given to an >2Yrs to ≤5Yrs

Winner
The Absolute employee for maximum PIS Exp.
12 12 All Functions HR NA HR Supported by HR One Data Twice a year
Attendance Award attendence and efficeint in >5Yrs to ≤8 Yrs
time management Winner
PIS Exp.

Winner >8 Yrs PIS Exp.

Page 5 of
 Employee Rewards & Recognition
HR Policy: QSP-HR-026
R&R STAR AWARDS
CATEGORY 1: BUSINESS EXCELLENCE
Total no.
NOMINATED BY
of Awards
Sl. Selection Criteria & Weightage (Total weightage Frequency of
REWARD NAME Definitions Division Break up Supporting Documents / Data Required Validated by PIS Tenure
No All Self/PDH/ is 100) Award
Locations Organization/Peer

1. Brief write-up (How did you support USA in FH Feedback - 40

Winner - PDH, the best way?)(200 words mandatory) Revenue Growth - 40
Self, FH, Peer VP Production > 2 Yrs PIS Exp
DPDH 2. Evidence of revenue/business impact HR - 10
[Link]/manager appreciation (if any) COE - 10

1. Write-up – How you are contributing

For employees in India who to/supporting USA operations.(100 words
Pinnacle Global
13 provide seamless support to 6 BIM mandatory) Twice a year
Synergy Award - USA Winner - Any level FH Feedback - 40
USA operations. 2. Work Samples/Deliverables – Screenshots,
employee BPMS Performance - 40
Self, PDH, Peer reports, or files showing quality. Technical Head > 1 Yrs PIS Exp
(excluding PDH & HR - 10
3. Collaboration Proof – Appreciation mails
DPDH) COE - 10
from clients and peers
4. Learning Evidence – Training or upskilling
certificates.

1. Brief write-up (How did you support Japan in FH Feedback - 40

Winner - PDH, the best way?)(200 words mandatory) Revenue Growth - 40
Self, FH, Peer VP Production > 2 Yrs PIS Exp
DPDH 2. Evidence of revenue/business impact HR - 10
[Link]/manager appreciation (if any) COE - 10

Pinnacle Global Recognizing employee for 1. Write-up – How you are contributing
14 Synergy Award - outstanding collaboration and 6 BIM to/supporting Japan operations.(100 words Twice a year
Japan support to Japan from India. mandatory)
Winner - Any level FH Feedback - 40
2. Work Samples/Deliverables – Screenshots,
employee BPMS Performance - 40
Self, PDH, Peer reports, or files showing quality. Technical Head > 1 Yrs PIS Exp
(excluding PDH & HR - 10
3. Collaboration Proof – Appreciation mails
DPDH) COE - 10
from clients and peers
4. Learning Evidence – Training or upskilling
certificates.

1. Brief write-up (How did you support Europe FH Feedback - 40

Winner - in the best way?)(200 words mandatory) Revenue Growth - 40
Self, FH, Peer VP Production > 2 Yrs PIS Exp
PDH,DPDH 2. Evidence of revenue/business impact HR - 10
[Link]/manager appreciation (if any) COE - 10

Pinnacle Global For an employee who 1. Write-up – How you are contributing
Synergy Award - demonstrates excellence in to/supporting Europe operations.(100 words
15 6 BIM Twice a year
Europe (Canada supporting European and mandatory)
included) Canadian projects from India. Winner - Any level FH Feedback - 40
2. Work Samples/Deliverables – Screenshots,
employee BPMS Performance - 40
Self, PDH, Peer reports, or files showing quality. Technical Head > 1 Yrs PIS Exp
(excluding PDH & HR - 10
3. Collaboration Proof – Appreciation mails
DPDH) COE - 10
from clients and peers
4. Learning Evidence – Training or upskilling
certificates.

Page 6 of
 Employee Rewards & Recognition
HR Policy: QSP-HR-026
R&R STAR AWARDS
CATEGORY 1: BUSINESS EXCELLENCE
Total no.
NOMINATED BY
of Awards
Sl. Selection Criteria & Weightage (Total weightage Frequency of
REWARD NAME Definitions Division Break up Supporting Documents / Data Required Validated by PIS Tenure
No All Self/PDH/ is 100) Award
Locations Organization/Peer

1. Brief write-up (How did you support

FH Feedback - 40
Singapore in the best way?)(200 words
Winner - Revenue Growth - 40
Self, FH, Peer mandatory) VP Production > 2 Yrs PIS Exp
PDH,DPDH HR - 10
2. Evidence of revenue/business impact
COE - 10
[Link]/manager appreciation (if any)

Pinnacle Global For employee who delivers 1. Write-up – How you are contributing
16 Synergy Award - precision-driven support to 6 BIM to/supporting Singapore operations. Twice a year
Singapore Singapore from India. 2. Work Samples/Deliverables –(100 words
Winner - Any level FH Feedback - 40
mandatory) Screenshots, reports, or files
employee BPMS Performance - 40
Self, PDH, Peer showing quality. Technical Head > 1 Yrs PIS Exp
(excluding PDH & HR - 10
3. Collaboration Proof – Appreciation mails
DPDH) COE - 10
from clients and peers
4. Learning Evidence – Training or upskilling
certificates.

1. Brief write-up (How did you support UAE in FH Feedback - 40

Winner - the best way?)(200 words mandatory) Revenue Growth - 40
Self, FH, Peer VP Production > 2 Yrs PIS Exp
PDH,DPDH 2. Evidence of revenue/business impact HR - 10
[Link]/manager appreciation (if any) COE - 10

1. Write-up – How you are contributing

For employee whose dedicated to/supporting UAE operations.(100 words
Pinnacle Global
17 efforts have strengthened UAE 6 BIM mandatory) Twice a year
Synergy Award - UAE Winner - Any level FH Feedback - 40
projects. 2. Work Samples/Deliverables – Screenshots,
employee BPMS Performance - 40
Self, PDH, Peer reports, or files showing quality. Technical Head > 1 Yrs PIS Exp
(excluding PDH & HR - 10
3. Collaboration Proof – Appreciation mails
DPDH) COE - 10
from clients and peers
4. Learning Evidence – Training or upskilling
certificates.

1. Brief write-up (How did you support KSA in FH Feedback - 40

Winner - the best way?)(200 words mandatory) Revenue Growth - 40
Self, FH, Peer VP Production > 2 Yrs PIS Exp
PDH,DPDH 2. Evidence of revenue/business impact HR - 10
[Link]/manager appreciation (if any) COE - 10

Celebrating employee’s 1. Write-up – How you are contributing

Pinnacle Global outstanding contribution to to/supporting KSA operations.(100 words
18 6 BIM mandatory) Twice a year
Synergy Award - KSA Saudi Arabia’s growth from Winner - Any level FH Feedback - 40
India. 2. Work Samples/Deliverables – Screenshots,
employee BPMS Performance - 40
Self, PDH, Peer reports, or files showing quality. Technical Head > 1 Yrs PIS Exp
(excluding PDH & HR - 10
3. Collaboration Proof – Appreciation mails
DPDH) COE - 10
from clients and peers
4. Learning Evidence – Training or upskilling
certificates.

Page 7 of
 Employee Rewards & Recognition
HR Policy: QSP-HR-026
R&R STAR AWARDS
CATEGORY 2: PEOPLE AND CULTURE
Total no.
NOMINATED BY
of Awards
Sl. Selection Criteria & Weightage (Total weightage Frequency of
REWARD NAME Definitions Division Break up Supporting Documents / Data Required Validated by PIS Tenure
No All Self/PDH/ is 100) Award
Locations Organization/Peer

This award recognizes new Winner of 1st

joiners and BOPT trainees who Place 1. Training Exam Score & Overall Feedback – 30
1. New Initiatives: List of initiatives taken, brief
have consistently (Knowledge, skill readiness, adaptability during
description (200 words mandatory), and
demonstrated extraordinary Winner of 2nd training)
proof of successful execution (reports,
potential, exceptional BIM Place 2. HOD/FH Feedback – 50
feedback, outcomes). > 6 months and
The Rising Rockstar performance, and strong PDH, Training, (Performance on live tasks/projects, team
19 12 SELF < 12 months Twice a year
Award alignment with our core values. HR contribution, ownership, and successful
Winner of 3rd 2. Projects: Details of projects handled, PIS exp.
It celebrates individuals who, execution of tasks/initiatives)
Place role/contribution, outcome achieved, and
even in the early stages of their 3. HR – Attendance & Overall Conduct – 20
supporting evidence (status reports,
journey with us, stand out as (Punctuality, reliability, participation in
client/manager feedback).
future talent for the BSD/BED Winner engagement activities, and disciplinary)
organization.
This award honors individuals 1. Nomination Form/Write-up from PDH (200
who not only excel in their own words mandatory) – Detailing how the
performance but also uplift and Winner nominee has empowered, supported, or
inspire those around them. It inspired others.
The Empowerment celebrates people who
20 6 All Functions Self, PDH Jury Members > 1 Yrs PIS Exp PDH Feedback Twice a year
Award demonstrate confidence, 2. Evidence of Initiatives/Activities – Any
inclusivity, and a positive programs, projects, or actions led by the
spirit—empowering others Winner nominee that demonstrate empowerment
through their actions, values, (e.g., mentoring, guiding peers, inclusion
and collaboration. drives).
Recognizes individuals who,
through exceptional
1. Overall teams performance in a period of
mentorship and guidance, have
last 6 months in terms of timely delivery of
The Legacy Builder shaped future leaders, inspired DPDH, PDH, Management Team's Feedback based on last 6
21 3 All Functions Winner SELF project orders Jury Members Twice a year
Award growth, and created a lasting FH, HOD months' performance
2. Chart showing efficiency improvement and
impact by empowering others
output.
to achieve their highest
potential.

Winner of 1st Demonstrated ability to effectively manage

1. COE audit score for respective new PM's (30)
Place and deliver multiple projects.
Recognizes individuals who 2. Project efficiency of new PM's- like no of
BIM, CAD PM & Above
nurture and develop talent by projects handled and time taken to complete
Successful and timely completion of key/major
mentoring new project Winner of 2nd major projects (40+30)
projects with measurable outcomes. COE, R&D, Jury
22 The Nurturer Award managers, taking the initiative, 9 Place Self/Manager Twice a year
Members
and supporting team members
Note: A detailed nomination write-up is
through additional
mandatory to support the application,
responsibilities and guidance.
BSD & BED Winner highlighting achievements, contributions, and All Tenure 1. Manager feedback (BED & BSD) (100)
impact.

1. Number of Add-Ins Usage - R&D (25)

Celebrates new joiners who 1. Number of Add-Ins Usage
Winner of 1st 2. HIT Count - R&D (25)
have quickly created impact 2. HIT Count
Place 3. PDH Feedback (25)
through innovation,
>6 Month to ≤ 4. FH Feedback (25)
23 The High Flyer Award outstanding contributions, and 6 BIM Self/Manager Note: A detailed nomination write-up is R&D, PDH, FH Twice a year
2Yrs PIS Exp.
active participation in training mandatory to support the application,
and organizational initiatives Winner of 2nd highlighting achievements, contributions, and
within their initial tenure. Place impact. (200 words mandatory)

Page 8 of
 Employee Rewards & Recognition
HR Policy: QSP-HR-026
R&R STAR AWARDS
CATEGORY 2: PEOPLE AND CULTURE
Total no.
NOMINATED BY
of Awards
Sl. Selection Criteria & Weightage (Total weightage Frequency of
REWARD NAME Definitions Division Break up Supporting Documents / Data Required Validated by PIS Tenure
No All Self/PDH/ is 100) Award
Locations Organization/Peer

Winner of 1st 1. No of Topics (20)

place 1. Number, hours & topic of training provided 2. Hours of training (20)
Training Team
Honors individuals who BIM in 6 months 3. Training feedback (20)
Winner of 2nd & R&D Dept.
introduce innovative practices 2. New tool requisition 4. No of solutions provided at PKBS (20)
Place 5. New Tool requisition (20)
in talent management, learning
24 The Maestro Award & development, or business 12 Self/Manager > 2 Yrs PIS Exp Twice a year
improvement initiatives that Winner of 1st 1. No. of new initiatives taken and executed
Jury Members Department Heads Feedback
drive measurable impact on place successfully
organizational growth BSD & BED
Winner of 2nd 1. No. of new initiatives taken and executed
Jury Members Department Heads Feedback
Place successfully

< = 4 Yrs PIS

Winner 1. Department Exp 1. Reporting Manager (30)
1. Overall team's performance in the last 6 Head
This award honors an employee Winner > 4 Yrs PIS Exp 2. FH (20)
months in terms of timely delivery of project 2. HR
who exemplifies expertise, BIM 3. R&D (15)- HIT count Twice a year
orders 3. R&D < = 4 Yrs PIS
professionalism, and integrity— Winner 4. COE (15) - Audit score
25 The Polymath Award 18 SELF 2. Chart showing efficiency improvement and 5. COE Exp
earning respect, fostering 5. Training (20) - Training imparted
output. 6. Training
harmony, and upholding the Winner > 4 Yrs PIS Exp
organization’s reputation. BSD - Winner HOD > 4 Yrs PIS Exp
BSD & BED HOD feedback Twice a year
BED - Winner 1. Overall performance in the last 6 months HOD > 4 Yrs PIS Exp

This award recognizes the

Project Manager of the Half
ACS Winner
Year who has exemplified
reliability through consistent,
1. Revenue achievement in 6 months
The Reliable PM outstanding performance. It
26 6 PDH 2. Client feedback in last 6 months Jury Members PMs FH Feedback Twice a year
Award honors a leader who delivers
3. COE Score in last 6 months
with excellence, earns trust,
and demonstrates unwavering MEP Winner
commitment to successful
project execution throughout.

The Power of Unity Team 1. Revenue Achieved in % (20)

Winner of 1st 2. Value addition made - PDH Feedback (20)
Award recognizes a group of
Place 3. Timely completion of the project- PDH
individuals who exemplify
exceptional collaboration, MEP & Design Feedback (20)
synergy, and teamwork in Winner of 2nd 4. Attrition (20)
The Power of Unity achieving shared goals. This Place 5. COE Score (20)
From System
27 Team Award (ACS / award honors teams whose 12 NA Jury Members NA Twice a year
Data
MEP) collective efforts, seamless
coordination, and mutual Winner of 1st
support have led to outstanding Place
ACS & Design
results, setting an example of
unity and cooperation within Winner of 2nd
ACS/MEP. Place

Page 9 of
 Employee Rewards & Recognition
HR Policy: QSP-HR-026
R&R STAR AWARDS
CATEGORY 2: PEOPLE AND CULTURE
Total no.
NOMINATED BY
of Awards
Sl. Selection Criteria & Weightage (Total weightage Frequency of
REWARD NAME Definitions Division Break up Supporting Documents / Data Required Validated by PIS Tenure
No All Self/PDH/ is 100) Award
Locations Organization/Peer

Winner
This award celebrates project Project Size <=
teams whose joint efforts have 300 hrs
led to exceptional MEP & Design Winner
achievements in quality, Project Size >
efficiency, and innovation. It 300hrs
Team Excellence in 1. Client Satisfaction & Feedback (40)
highlights the strength of From System
28 Project Award 12 NA Jury Members NA 2. COE Score (30) Twice a year
teamwork in overcoming Data
(MEP/ACS) Winner 3. Outstanding Invoice - Accounts team (30)
challenges and creating
impactful, revenue-driven Project Size <=
results. The COE team 300 hrs
ACS & Design
determines the winner through Winner
project audits. Project Size >
300hrs
Security,
This award is presented to the
Housekeeping Winner
support staff whose dedication,
& Canteen
reliability, and hard work form
Pillars of Support the backbone of the Winner
29 9 Admin Head NA Admin Head All Tenure Admin Twice a year
Award organization. It recognizes their
vital role in maintaining a Landscape &
smooth, safe, and positive work Office Boys
Winner
environment.

This award recognizes the Winner

trainer who has been a true ACS
guiding light, imparting Winner
knowledge and skills that Winner 1. Number of training programs he has 1. No. of training programs he has imparted in
empower trainees to excel in MEP Training Head
Guiding Mentor Winner Self, HOD, imparted in the last 6 months last 6 months - 30
30 their domains. It honors 18 & Jury > 1 Yrs PIS Exp Twice a year
Award Training Head 2. Feedback received from trainees 2. Feedback received from trainees - 40
exceptional mentorship, Winner Members
3. Feedback of Training Head 3. Feedback of Training Head -30
dedication, and the ability to
inspire growth and BSD/BED
development throughout the Winner
year.
This award is presented to E - Excellence Winner
employees who embody the A - Agility Winner An employee or manager assessment for the
core PIS values of Excellence, R - Reliability Winner nominee, highlighting specific examples of
Value Champion of Agility, Reliability, Teamwork, > 1 year of any
31 15 T - Teamwork Winner PDH, Peer, FH how they demonstrated and lived the core PIS HOD & HR HOD & HR Feedback Twice a year
PIS Award and Honesty throughout the department
values in their day-to-day work and
year, serving as true champions
H - Honesty Winner interactions.
and role models of our
organizational culture.

This award recognizes the Best

Shared Services team for the
Performance and support provided to all other
32 Best Shared Services Half year who have been 3 BED Winner Organization Jury Members All Tenure Jury Members Twice a year
functions in last 6 months
providing continuous support
and collaboration

Page 10 of
 Employee Rewards & Recognition
HR Policy: QSP-HR-026
R&R STAR AWARDS
CATEGORY 2: PEOPLE AND CULTURE
Total no.
NOMINATED BY
of Awards
Sl. Selection Criteria & Weightage (Total weightage Frequency of
REWARD NAME Definitions Division Break up Supporting Documents / Data Required Validated by PIS Tenure
No All Self/PDH/ is 100) Award
Locations Organization/Peer

This award honors employees Winner Yearly Once

Pinnacle Icon Award - who embody elegance,
33 6 All Functions SELF, Peer, PDH NA Jury Members > 1 Yrs PIS Exp By Voting - Before the
Male/Female confidence, and presentability at
FY ends
work, while also making Winner
remarkable contributions to
employee engagement and co-
curricular activities. They set an
inspiring benchmark for others
to follow, both in
professionalism and in creating a
vibrant workplace culture
This award aims to recognize
the high-potential high
BIM (MEP,
performer talent who has Yearly Once
The CEO ACS, CAD, Overall Performance of PDH/FH/HOD in the PDHs/FH/
34 shown outstanding 3 Winner CEO CEO CEO - Before the
Distinguished Award Design), BSD, last 6 months HODs
performance and contribution FY ends
BED
during his career at PIS and
been an asset for the Company
This award recognizes
Yearly Once
Campus Builder individuals who have made Centrally 1
35 1 BED/BIM CEO Overall Performance in the last 6 months CEO > 2 Yrs PIS Exp CEO - Before the
Award significant contributions to Winner
FY ends
strengthening our campus.

Page 11 of