0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views4 pages

Key Historical Environmental Movements

The document outlines various historical environmental movements in India, highlighting their leaders, aims, and significant events. Key movements include the Bishnoi Movement, Chipko Movement, Save Silent Valley Movement, Jungle Bachao Andolan, Appiko Movement, Narmada Bachao Andolan, and the Tehri Dam Conflict, each advocating for the protection of natural resources and local ecosystems. These movements reflect the growing awareness and activism surrounding environmental conservation in India over the centuries.

Uploaded by

tanujsingh180089
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views4 pages

Key Historical Environmental Movements

The document outlines various historical environmental movements in India, highlighting their leaders, aims, and significant events. Key movements include the Bishnoi Movement, Chipko Movement, Save Silent Valley Movement, Jungle Bachao Andolan, Appiko Movement, Narmada Bachao Andolan, and the Tehri Dam Conflict, each advocating for the protection of natural resources and local ecosystems. These movements reflect the growing awareness and activism surrounding environmental conservation in India over the centuries.

Uploaded by

tanujsingh180089
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

HISTORICAL ENVIRONMENT MOVEMENTS

 An environmental movement can be defined as a social or political movement,


for the conservation of the environment or for the improvement of the state of
the environment. The terms ‘green movement’ or ‘conservation movement’ are
alternatively used to denote the same.
 The environmental movements favour the sustainable management of
natural resources. The movements often stress the protection of the
environment via changes in public policy. Many movements are centred
on ecology, health and human rights.

BISHNOI MOVEMENT

 Year: 1700s
 Place: Khejarli, Marwar region, Rajasthan state.
 Leaders: Amrita Devi along with Bishnoi villagers in Khejarli and surrounding
villages.
 Aim: Save sacred trees from being cut down by the king’s soldiers for a new
palace.

What was it all about: Amrita Devi, a female villager could not bear to witness the
destruction of both her faith and the village’s sacred trees. She hugged the trees and
encouraged others to do the same. 363 Bishnoi villagers were killed in this
movement.

The king who came to know about these events rushed to the village and
apologized, ordering the soldiers to cease logging operations. Soon afterwards, the
maharajah designated the Bishnoi state as a protected area, forbidding harm to trees
and animals. This legislation still exists today in the region.

CHIPKO MOVEMENT

 Year: 1973
 Place: In Chamoli district and later in Tehri-Garhwal district of Uttarakhand.
 Leaders: Sundarlal Bahuguna, Gaura Devi, Sudesha Devi, Bachni Devi,
Chandi Prasad Bhatt, Govind Singh Rawat, Dhoom Singh Negi, Shamsher
Singh Bisht and Ghanasyam Raturi.
 Aim: The main objective was to protect the trees on the Himalayan slopes from
the axes of contractors of the forest.

What was it all about: Mr. Bahuguna enlightened the villagers by conveying the
importance of trees in the environment which check the erosion of soil, cause rains
and provide pure air. The women of Advani village of Tehri-Garhwal tied the sacred
thread around the trunks of trees and they hugged the trees, hence it was called the
‘Chipko Movement’ or ‘hug the tree movement’.

The main demand of the people in these protests was that the benefits of the forests
(especially the right to fodder) should go to local people. The Chipko movement
gathered momentum in 1978 when the women faced police firings and other
tortures.

The then state Chief Minister, Hemwati Nandan Bahuguna set up a committee to
look into the matter, which eventually ruled in favour of the villagers. This became a
turning point in the history of eco-development struggles in the region and around
the world.

SAVE SILENT VALLEY MOVEMENT

 Year: 1978
 Place: Silent Valley, an evergreen tropical forest in the Palakkad district of
Kerala, India.
 Leaders: The Kerala Sastra Sahitya Parishad (KSSP) an NGO, and the poet-
activist Sughathakumari played an important role in the Silent Valley protests.
 Aim: To protect the Silent Valley, the moist evergreen forest from being
destroyed by a hydroelectric project.

What was it all about: The Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) proposed a
hydroelectric dam across the Kunthipuzha River that runs through Silent Valley. In
February 1973, the Planning Commission approved the project at a cost of about Rs
25 crores. Many feared that the project would submerge 8.3 sq km of untouched
moist evergreen forest. Several NGOs strongly opposed the project and urged the
government to abandon it.

In January 1981, bowing to unrelenting public pressure, Indira Gandhi declared that
Silent Valley will be protected. In June 1983 the Center re-examined the issue
through a commission chaired by Prof. M.G.K. Menon. In November 1983 the Silent
Valley Hydroelectric Project was called off. In 1985, Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi
formally inaugurated the Silent Valley National Park.

JUNGLE BACHAO ANDOLAN

 Year: 1982
 Place: Singhbhum district of Bihar
 Leaders: The tribals of Singhbhum.
 Aim: Against the government’s decision to replace the natural sal
forest with Teak.

What was it all about: The tribals of the Singhbhum district of Bihar started the
protest when the government decided to replace the natural sal forests with the
highly-priced teak. This move was called by many “Greed Game Political Populism”.
Later this movement spread to Jharkhand and Orissa.
APPIKO MOVEMENT

 Year: 1983
 Place: Uttara Kannada and Shimoga districts of Karnataka State
 Leaders: Appiko’s greatest strengths lie in it being neither driven by a
personality nor having been formally institutionalised. However, it does have a
facilitator in Pandurang Hegde. He helped launch the movement in 1983.
 Aim: Against the felling and commercialization of natural forest and the ruin of
ancient livelihood.

What was it all about: It can be said that the Appiko movement is the southern
version of the Chipko movement. The Appiko Movement was locally known as
“Appiko Chaluvali”. The locals embraced the trees which were to be cut by
contractors of the forest department. The Appiko movement used various techniques
to raise awareness such as foot marches in the interior forest, slide shows, folk
dances, street plays etc.

The second area of the movement’s work was to promote afforestation on denuded
lands. The movement later focused on the rational use of the ecosphere by
introducing alternative energy resource to reduce pressure on the forest. The
movement became a success. The current status of the project is – stopped.

NARMADA BACHAO ANDOLAN (NBA)

 Year: 1985
 Place: Narmada River, which flows through the states of Gujarat, Madhya
Pradesh and Maharashtra.
 Leaders: Medha Patker, Baba Amte, Adivasis, farmers, environmentalists and
human rights activists.
 Aim: A social movement against several large dams being built across
the Narmada River.

What was it all about: The movement first started as a protest for not providing
proper rehabilitation and resettlement for the people who have been displaced by the
construction of the Sardar Sarovar Dam. Later on, the movement turned its focus
on the preservation of the environment and the eco-systems of the valley. Activists
also demanded the height of the dam to be reduced to 88 m from the proposed
height of 130m. World Bank withdrew from the project.

The environmental issue was taken into court. In October 2000, the Supreme Court
gave a judgment approving the construction of the Sardar Sarovar Dam with a
condition that the height of the dam could be raised to 90 m. This height is much
higher than the 88 m which anti-dam activists demanded, but it is definitely lower
than the proposed height of 130 m. The project is now largely financed by the state
governments and market borrowings. The project is expected to be fully completed
by 2025.
Although not successful, as the dam could not be prevented, the NBA has created
an anti-big dam opinion in India and outside. It questioned the paradigm of
development. As a democratic movement, it followed the Gandhian way 100 per cent

TEHRI DAM CONFLICT

 Year: 1990’s
 Place: Bhagirathi River near Tehri in Uttarakhand.
 Leaders: Sundarlal Bahuguna
 Aim: The protest was against the displacement of town inhabitants and the
environmental consequence of the weak ecosystem.

Tehri Dam attracted national attention in the 1980s and the 1990s. The major
objections include seismic sensitivity of the region, the submergence of forest areas
along with Tehri town etc. Despite the support from other prominent leaders like
Sunderlal Bahuguna, the movement has failed to gather enough popular support at
the national as well as international levels.

Common questions

Powered by AI

Both the Chipko and Appiko movements aimed to protect forests by embracing non-violent resistance through tree-hugging actions. The Chipko movement started in 1973 in the Himalayan slopes, initiated by leaders like Sundarlal Bahuguna to prevent deforestation by contractors . Similarly, the Appiko movement began in 1983 in Karnataka, led without a central personality but facilitated by Pandurang Hegde, also protesting against commercial logging . While the Chipko movement had strong women's involvement directly tied to local ecological knowledge, Appiko emphasized diverse methods of raising public awareness like foot marches and performances .

Women played a pivotal role in the Chipko Movement, transforming gender roles within environmental activism. Women leaders such as Gaura Devi were at the forefront, organizing tree-hugging protests and educating peers about the ecological importance of forests. Their leadership shifted traditional gender dynamics, as women emerged as vocal custodians of natural resources. By asserting their agency, these women catalyzed a broader movement that challenged patriarchal norms, highlighting the interlinkage between gender justice and ecological preservation. This movement marked a significant shift in environmental activism, proving that women could be central actors in sustainability efforts .

The Jungle Bachao Andolan, initiated in 1982 by tribal communities in Bihar, emphasized the intersection of environmental activism and indigenous rights by protesting the replacement of natural sal forests with teak plantations. The movement underscored how government decisions often overlooked the traditional rights and ecological wisdom of indigenous peoples. By resisting this 'Green Game Political Populism,' tribals defended their environment and underscored their intrinsic connection to the land. This movement broadened the discourse on conservation by linking ecological preservation with the protection of indigenous peoples' livelihoods and cultural heritage .

The Bishnoi Movement, led by Amrita Devi in the 1700s in the Marwar region of Rajasthan, exemplifies the integration of environmental protection with cultural and religious values by portraying trees as sacred. This was evident when Amrita Devi and 363 villagers sacrificed their lives to prevent the cutting of sacred trees by the king's soldiers, demonstrating their deep commitment to preserving their spiritual beliefs alongside their environment. The king, recognizing this deep cultural significance, designated the Bishnoi state as a protected area, an ordinance that remains today .

Local knowledge and traditional practices were integral to the Appiko Movement's success, demonstrating the power of indigenous environmental stewardship. The movement leveraged these traditional practices to promote sustainable interactions with the forest, emphasizing indigenous methods of conservation over commercial exploitation. Techniques like foot marches, street plays, and folk dances resonated culturally, educating communities while fostering local participation. This integration of cultural heritage and environmental action reinforced the community's environmental ethos, enabling the movement to halt deforestation effectively and inspire similar strategies in other regions .

The Narmada Bachao Andolan reshaped public perception by challenging the prevailing notion that large dams are unequivocally beneficial. Led by activists like Medha Patkar, the NBA brought attention to issues of displacement, lack of proper rehabilitation, and environmental degradation. The movement's activities, including international advocacy leading to the World Bank's withdrawal, raised awareness about the societal and environmental costs of such projects. Although the Supreme Court eventually permitted the development of the Sardar Sarovar Dam at a reduced height, the NBA's efforts highlighted the need for a balanced approach in development, ushering a paradigm shift towards sustainability and respect for local communities .

The Bishnoi movement's success in establishing protected areas highlighted the efficacy of grassroots interventions in conservation. By persuading the Maharajah to legally protect trees and wildlife, the movement set a historical precedent for localized environmental governance predicated on communal values. This legislative outcome underscored the potential of cultural and religious advocacy driving impactful conservation policies, inspiring future movements by demonstrating the power of community-led protection of natural resources. Its enduring legacy affirms the viability of integrating cultural values with ecological sustainability .

The Tehri Dam conflict centered on the potential ecological impacts and displacement of local communities. The primary environmental concern was the dam's location in a seismically sensitive area, which posed risks to both the ecosystem and nearby inhabitants. Additionally, the submergence of forest lands, including the town of Tehri, threatened local biodiversity and disrupted the socio-cultural fabric of the community. Despite Sundarlal Bahuguna's efforts to halt the project through international awareness, the lack of broad-based support meant that environmental and displacement issues did not gain enough traction, highlighting the challenges of activism in the face of economic developmental pressures .

The Save Silent Valley movement, led by NGOs like the KSSP and activists including Sughathakumari, significantly influenced government policy by exemplifying how sustained public pressure can alter developmental plans. Initially approved by the Planning Commission, the hydroelectric project faced widespread opposition due to concerns about ecosystem destruction. The movement’s persistence led to Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's intervention, resulting in the abandonment of the project and the subsequent establishment of Silent Valley as a National Park in 1985. This marked a critical shift in government policy, showcasing a greater willingness to consider ecological impacts, spurring future policy decisions to more thoroughly evaluate environmental concerns .

Both the Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA) and the Tehri Dam conflict sought to influence water management policies through highlighting human and ecological costs of large dam projects. The NBA, primarily focused on resettlement issues and environmental preservation, managed to bring about debate on dam construction ethics, even influencing the World Bank’s withdrawal . Despite partial success in reducing dam height, it reshaped public discourse on sustainable development. In contrast, the Tehri Dam protest lacked sufficient traction but highlighted the importance of considering seismic risks and broader environmental impact, impacting future policy discussions. Collectively, these movements underscored the need for more inclusive and sustainable water resource management strategies .

You might also like