Understanding Correlation in Education
Understanding Correlation in Education
16.1 INTRODUCTION
In Units 13 & 14, we have discussed those statistical measures that we use
for a single variable i.e. the distribution relating to one quantitative variable. Now,
we shall study the problem of describing the degree of simultaneous variation
of two or more variables. The data in which we secure measures of one variable
for each individual is called a univariate distribution. If we have pairs of measures
on two variables of each individual, the joint presentation of the two sets of
scores is called a bivariate distribution.
You may want to study the possibility of a relationship between two variables
and see what kind of relationship exists. For example if you want to study
70 the relationship between height and weight - whether the change in one will
bring a change in other or not. Or if you want to find the relationship between Correlation: Importance
and Interpretation
hours of study and achievement, sex and enrolment etc., you can do so by
finding correlation between them. In simple words, we can say that the statistical
tool which helps us to study the relationships between two or more than two
variables is called correlation. According to Tuttle, “Correlation is an analysis
of the co-variation between two or more variables”. With the change in one
variable, the other related variable changes is known as correlation. You know
that as the child grows, the height as well as weight increases. Similarly, if a
person has more height than the other, the person is likely to have more weight
than the latter and we can say height and weight are positively correlated. You
will study about correlation in greater details in this unit.
16.2 OBJECTIVES
After reading this Unit, you will be able to:
define correlation;
define co-efficient of correlation;
recognize various types of correlation;
calculate the co-efficient of correlation according to nature of scores and
their distribution;
interpret the results obtained i.e. interpret the Co-efficient of correlation;
take necessary precautions in interpreting the co-efficient of correlation; and
discuss the importance of correlation and its coefficient.
1 25 35
2 20 30
3 35 45
4 28 39
5 45 50
6 36 47
7 50 65
8 18 25
9 12 20
10 40 48
Now you can see that the marks of Urdu and History achieved by all the ten
students are moving in the same direction i.e. increasing/decreasing in the same
order. Thus, we say achievement of students in Urdu and History is positively
correlated.
(ii) Negative Correlation: If the two paired variables under study vary in
opposite direction with any change, then they are said to be negatively correlated.
It means that if one of them increases, the other related variable will decrease
and if one of the related variable decreases, the other will increase. Both the
74
variables have opposite direction of change. For example, the supply and the
prices of commodities. You know, if the commodity is available in abundance,
the prices fall and if it is in shortage, the prices will rise. The same could be Correlation: Importance
and Interpretation
the case with absenteeism and achievement. More the students absent themselves
from the school, the lesser will be the achievement and vice versa. These are
common examples which must have clarified the concept of negative correlation.
You could give some more examples of negative correlation at your end. Negative
correlation is not very common in our studies but it may appear, needing
explanation in many of your studies.
16.5.2 Simple, Multiple and Partial Correlation
This classification is based on the number of variables being studied.
(i) Simple Correlation: In simple correlation only two variables are studied.
For example, in most of bi-variate studies like the correlation between height
and weight, correlation between the hours of study and achievement,
correlation between the method of teaching and achievement of students
etc., we have to find simple correlation.
(ii) Multiple Correlation: In multiple correlation three or more variables are
studied simultaneously. For example, when you want to study method of
teaching, sex, social-economic status and achievement and find the
correlations among them simultaneously, you have to see the effect of
interactions among the variables along with correlation and these are studied
through multiple correlations.
(iii) Partial Correlation: Partial correlation is also used in study of correlation
of more than two variables, but in this case it is supposed that we want
to study only two variables which are said to be influencing each other,
the effect of other influencing variables being kept constant. For example,
if we want to study the effect of hours of study and achievement but the
third variable intelligence is all the time influencing, then its effect has to
be kept constant or partialled out.
16.5.3 Linear and Curvilinear Correlation
(i) Linear Correlation: Most of the correlations you will deal with in your
research studies will be linear correlations and in common sense correlation
is generally understood by the term simple linear correlation only. If the
amount of change in one variable tends to bear a constant ratio to the
amount of change in the other related variable, then the correlation is said
to be linear correlation.
Example:
The scores obtained by students of Class VIII on two variables say intelligence
and achievement are as under:
1 60
2 65
3 72
4 78
5 83
EFFICIENT OF CORRELATION
(UNGROUPED DATA)
In case of ungrouped data of bivariate distribution, the following three methods
are used to compute the value of co-efficient of correlation.
1. Rank Difference Co-efficient of Correlation or Spearman’s Rank Order
Co-efficient of Correlation.
2. Pearson’s Product Moment Co-efficient of Correlation.
3. Pearson’s Product Moment Co-efficient of Correlation from Scatter
Diagram.
2. After giving ranks to both the set of variables, find the difference between
these ranks of two set of scores. This is calculated as an absolute score
because the sign of these differences does not effect and is of no importance
as the differences have to be squared in the next step.
Example:
Suppose you have administered a Personality test and a Mental Ability test to
some students of your school and you are interested in finding the degree of
association between personality and mental ability. Let us assume that you got
the following scores on the two tests. These scores are taken for convenience
only.
To find the rank order correlation coefficient among these two variables, let
78 us find the ranks and form another table for computations.
Table 16.1 : Table for Computation of Rank Order Coefficient of Correlation: Importance
and Interpretation
Correlation
Student Personality Mental Rank Rank D = D2
Score Ability Personality Mental R1-R2
Score (R1) Ability
(R2)
1 60 60 1 2 1 1
2 54 68 2 1 1 1
5 49 51 4.5 4.5 0 0
6 47 38 6 14 8 64
8 45 32 9 17 8 64
9 45 39 9 13 4 16
10 45 41 9 10 1 1
11 43 50 11 6 5 25
13 39 36 13 16 3 9
15 32 40 15.5 11.5 4 16
17 30 37 17 15 2 4
D2 =
386.5
Now in this Table:
(i) First find the ranks of Personality scores. In column P these ranks have
been calculated like 60 is the highest score which has been given rank
1. 54,53 being the next scores have been given ranks 2,3 respectively
whereas, 42 is repeated two times. So on averaging 4 and 5, both of
these are given the rank 4.5 each. Similarly, 32 is repeated two times and
is given the rank of 15.5 each on averaging 15 and 16 ranks. So all the
personality scores are given the ranks from 1 to 17.
(ii) Similarly, find the ranks of Mental Ability scores. In column Q, these ranks
have been calculated like, score 68 is given rank one, 60 and 52 have
been given ranks 2 and 3 respectively whereas, 51 appears two times
and has been given the ranks of 4.5 each. Similarly, 48 appears two times 79
Analysing and Interpreting and is given rank of 7.5 each being an average of 7 and 8. Similarly 40
Learner’s Performance
is also repeated and is given the rank of 11.5 each, being an average of
11 and 12. Thus, scores are awarded the ranks from 1 to 17.
(iii) Now find the difference of Ranks of each of the score pairs of Personality
and Mental ability in each row. Thus, the difference of ranks of each of
these ranks is column R = Column Q – Column P without sign.
(iv) In next column find the squares of the difference of ranks, i.e. S column
is the square of the Difference. Column S is (column R)2. For example,
in Table you have got D2 = 1,1,72.25, 2.25 etc. for the first four students.
Hence Column S = Column R2.
(v) Apply the values in the formula to find rank order coefficient of correlation:
6 D2
() = 1
N(N 2 1)
In this example
D2 = 386.50
N = 17
N2 = 289
() = 1 – 6×386.5
17 (289 – 1)
() = 1 – 2319.0
4896
= 1 – 0.47 = 0.53
16.6.2 Pearson’s Product Moment Coefficient of
Correlation (r)
Pearson’s Coefficient of correlation is determined when the data of variables
consists of scores paired in some meaningful way. There are several ways of
calculating ‘r’ in such cases.
(a) Deviation Score Method
In this method, coefficient of correlation is calculated on the basis of deviations
of the scores from their means and is defined by the following formula.
xy
rxy = 1
nSx Sy
Suppose you have the scores of ten students in Physics and Mathematics as
follows and are interested in finding the coefficient of correlation between them.
X 2
Sx = = 4.57
N
Y 2
Sy = = 4.76
N
In this Method,
i. Find means of both the scores i.e. scores of Physics and Mathematics
as calculated above are 39.1 and 77.6
ii. Then find deviation of each score from means as (x) and (y).
iii. Then find deviation squares in each case as calculated below and sum them
up. These values in this example are: X2=208.9 and X2=226.4
81
Analysing and Interpreting Table 16.3 : Table for Calculation of Product Moment Coefficient of
Learner’s Performance
correlation by Deviation Score Method
Student Phy Maths x y xy x2 y2
(x) (y) Deviation Deviation
xy
rxy
nSx Sy
= 129.4 / (10×4.57×4.76)
= 129.4 / 217.53
= 0.59
(b) Computation of ‘r’ by Raw Score Method
In the raw score method if you substitute the values of deviations in raw score
form and value of standard deviations in raw score form you will get the following
formula for the calculation of coefficient of correlation from raw scores :
NΣXY– ΣX ΣY
r=
NΣX – ΣX NΣY –(ΣY)
2 2 2 2
Let us take an example for formula and find out the coefficient of correlation.
In following example, raw scores and the steps for calculating ‘r’ by Raw score
82 method have been provided.
Example Correlation: Importance
and Interpretation
Table 16.4: Table for Computation of ‘r’ by Raw Score Method
S. Score Score X2 Y2 XY
No. in in
language History
(x) (y)
1 20 12 400 144 240
2 18 16 324 256 288
3 16 10 256 100 160
4 15 14 225 196 210
5 14 12 196 144 168
6 12 10 144 100 120
7 12 9 144 81 108
8 10 2 100 4 20
9 8 7 64 49 56
10 5 8 25 64 40
(i) First find sum of all raw scores of language and History X and Y
Where, X = 130 and Y = 100 as above
(ii) Then find squares of the scores of language and History X2 and Y2 which
are calculated in column no. 4 and 5.
(iii) Find sum of squares of raw scores of language and History as above
X2 = 1878 and Y2 = 1138
(iv) Then find multiple of raw scores of each pair (XY)
(v) Find sum of multiple of raw scores of each pair as above.
XY = 1410
(vi) Now find Coefficient of Correlation by substituting each value.
NΣXY– ΣX ΣY
r=
NΣX – ΣX NΣY – ΣY
2 2 2 2
14100 –13000
r=
18780 –16900 11380 –10000 83
Analysing and Interpreting
1100
Learner’s Performance
1880 1380
= 1100 / 1610.7
= 0.68
(c) Standard Score or Z – Score Method
In this method, we neither use raw scores nor their deviations from the mean.
In stead we use the standard scores to find the coefficient of correlation. Thus
in this case first we transform both the variables into their standard scores and
then find coefficient of correlation by the following formula:
Σ Zx Z y
r=
N
x y
Zx = and Zy =
Sx Sy
(v) Then find multiple of both the Z scores (Zx) (Zy) and sum it up
(vi) Find correlation coefficient by substituting the above value in the formula
Σ Zx Z y
r=
N
Let us illustrate it with the same example as in the previous case of scores
of language and scores of history.
Example
Table 16.5 : Table for the calculation of Coefficient of correlation
by Standard Score of Z – Score Method
[Link]. X Y X Y Zx Zy ZxZy
1 20 12 7 2 1.61 0.54 0.8694
2 18 16 5 6 1.15 1.62 1.8637
3 16 10 3 0 0.69 0.00 0
4 15 14 2 4 0.46 1.08 0.4968
5 14 12 1 2 0.23 0.54 0.1242
84
Correlation: Importance
6 12 10 –1 0 –0.23 0.00 0 and Interpretation
X = 13 Y = 10 Sy=3.71
6.8317
r=
10
= 0.68
The above calculation is similar to the one calculated by other method. It does
not change for the same set of data. Thus we can say that the coefficient
of correlation calculated from deviation method, raw score method or the
standard scores method will remain unchanged because all these methods
are derived from the common formula of deviation in product moment coefficient
of correlation.
35 109 72 87
88
Analysing
Performance
Analysing and
25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80-84 85-89 P Q R S T
f y’ f y’ f y’ 2 y ’ x’
24
114-116 24 1 1 6 6 36 24
5 20 25
111-113 5 1 20 1 25 1 3 5 15 75 50
12
108-111 121 1 4 4 16 12
9 6 0 6 9 12 18
105-107 9 1 6 1 0 2 6 1 91 12 1 18 1 8 3 24 72 30
102-104 0 2 0 0 0
99-101 2 12 3 13 2 1 2 2 1
0
96-98 010 01 2 0 0 0 0
0 3
93-95 6 16 02 3 1 4 1 4 4 3
6
90-92 12 26 61 8 18 4 2 8 16 10
87-89 3 3 9 27 18
Y-Axis Achievement
12 1 12 623
4
84-86 20 1 20 41 4 14 12 2 1 2 4 4 16 64 8
81-83 20 1 20 1 5 5 25 20
78-80 12 26 2 6 12 72 12
A f 1 1 2 3 2 3 5 4 1 7 4 1 1 N=35
B x’ 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
C f x’ 6 5 8 9 4 3 0 4 2 21 16 5 6 fx’ = 33
2
D f x’ 2 36 25 32 27 8 3 0 4 4 63 64 25 36 x’ = 327
T x’ y’ 6 20 32 3 8 10 0 11 6 15 48 25 18 x’ y’ = 164
Let us understand the calculations in this scattergram table through the steps Correlation: Importance
and Interpretation
we had studied.
1. Paired set of scores are there in the form of mental ability scores and
achievement scores.
2. The classes of mental ability are formed from 78 to 116 with class intervals
of 4 as shown on Y axis.
4. Now scores are tallied as per their value on both the axis as shown in
between the Table. We enter first score pair (80, 61) in their respective
column and row. Similarly next (95, 28) pair is placed as tally in the
respective position and so on.
6. Add the tally on either side in their respective columns and rows to get
frequency as shown in row A and column P. These sums of all frequencies
of A and P will be same i.e. total N. This will recheck the tallies.
7. Now mark moments as the deviation from the middle class interval.
These are there in column Q and row B. The deviation of starting class
is ‘O’ and above the class, deviations are +1, +2, +3 .... and below the
class 1, 2, 3.... etc.
P × Q = R and A × B = C
9. Now again multiply them by moment on each column and in each row
to get S and D column and row respectively in this table. It is the product
of R × Q = S column and
10. Now sum all the rows and columns to get their sum ( ) i.e. get f x’,
fx’ 2, y’ and y’ 2.
11. Now find the product of the moments, i.e., the product of the x’ and y’
in T column.
12. Add the product moments which are there in column T i.e. you get x’y’.
89
Analysing and Interpreting 164 (33 6 / 35)
Learner’s Performance r=
327 - (332 /35) 409 6 2 / 35)
164 5.66
=
(327 - 31.11) (409 - 1.03)
158.34
=
295.89 407.97
158.34
= = 0.46 (Approx)
347.44
Check Your Progress 3
Note: a) Write your answers in the space given below.
b) Compare your answers with those given at the end of the Unit
READINGS
Aggarwal, Y.P. (1990), ‘Statistical Methods – Concepts, Applications and
Computation’, Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
Anderson, Richard L. (1952), ‘Statistical Theory in Research’, McGraw hills
Book Co., New York.
Best John W and James V. Kohn (2004), ‘Research in Education’, Prentice
Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.
Downie, N.M. (1983), ‘Basic Statistical Methods’, HarperCollins College Div.,
New York.
Ferguson, G.A. (1974), ‘Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education’,
McGraw Hill B.K. Co., New York.
Garrett. H.E. & Woodworth, R.S.(1969), ‘Statistics in Psychology and
Education’. Vakils, Feffer & Simons Pvt. Ltd., Bombay.
Guilford, J.P. & Benjamin, F.(1973), ‘Fundamental Statistics in Psychology
and Education’, McGraw Hill B.K. Co., New York.
Kerlinger, F.N.(1993), ‘Foundations of Behavioural Research: Educational
and Psychological Inquiry’. Holt, Rinchart & Winston, New York.
Loether, H.L. & McTavish, D.G. (1988), ‘Descriptive and Inferential Statistics:
An Introduction’, 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Sonedecor, G.W. & Cochran, W.G.(1967), ‘Statistical Methods’ (6th ed.),
Lowa State University Press, Ames, Lowa.
95