Education: Types, Views, and Impact
Education: Types, Views, and Impact
Functionalist view
● Believe that school ensures the smooth running of society.
● Schools pass on norms and values and continue socialization begun by the family. Since children
are socialized into the same values, they might feel a sense of belonging and camaraderie.
● The values children are socialized into are not universal and differ between classes. The
bourgeoisie who send their children to private schools, learn that they are superior to others.
Feminist view
● Believe that schools reinforce patriarchy and the belief that men are superior
● Women regularly have less access to education than men.
● Boys are often taught that they are superior to girls while girls may learn to lower their
expectations and be more likely to accept traditional gender roles.
○ Teachers encourage boys to focus on their careers and assume that girls only have a
future of marriage and motherhood.
○ Head teachers and principals are often male while women work as teachers or assistants.
This can subconsciously reinforce that men are better leaders.
○ Girls are taught different knowledge. The subject of Home Economics is often
encouraged for women which teaches them nutrition, cooking, decorating etc.
Marxist view
● Believe that school reinforces the power of the bourgeoisie and makes the working class feel
inferior.
● School teaches children that society is meritocratic and that earning good grades would mean
success in life. However, marxists believe that this is not true and that it makes the working class
accept their situation, causing fatalism.
● Schools prepare students in the working class and prepare them for skills the capitalist needs.
● Selective schools: schools that only admit pupils of certain academic prowess and exclude others.
● Single sex schools: mostly private schools that segregate students based on sex.
● Comprehensive schools: schools that accept all students regardless of ability.
For Comprehensive schools-
- Equal opportunity and same level of education.
- Inclusive of everyone regardless of gender, ethnicity or class.
Ethnicity
Why do some ethnic groups achieve lower?
● Ethnicity cannot be separated from class. Most ethnic minority groups are immigrants who are in
the working class. This means that pupils face both ethnic and class inequality.
● Ethnicity and gender are often linked. Asian families are more likely to push traditional gender
roles on girls which may limit their aspirations and motivation to study.
● Factors within school:-
○ Teachers may be prejudiced towards certain ethnic groups and label them deviant. This
can cause a self-fulfilling prophecy.
○ Lessons may be ethnocentric and teach the majority history, culture and religion. Pupils
may feel that their culture is undervalued. They may feel the lesson does not apply to
them and thus not focus on it.
○ School administrators and teachers may not take action against racist bullying towards
ethnic minorities. This can harm the mental health of minorities and make them feel
unwanted, leading to underachievement.
● Some minorities may not understand the host language. They could have difficulty understanding
lessons and teachers leading to lower grades.
Social Class
● Working class children are hampered by material and culture deprivation.
● Working class students may be insecure about their status which could be reinforced by teachers.
This could mean that they believe they can’t do w ell and underachieve as a result.
● Children may be labeled or streamed leading to their underachievement.
● Children of a higher class have access to better schooling, private tuitions and other resources.
These disadvantages are called home factors and affect how they do in school. Middle class or the ruling
class are able to provide their children with private tutors, subject books and extra sessions with their
teachers.
Culture Influences
Social Class:-
Some sociologists argue that the working class has formed a culture of their own and it can affect their
achievement in school. This idea refers to cultural deprivation. Cultural deprivation stems from values
and attitudes rather than a lack of money or resources. Some aspects of the working class culture that
hamper educational achievements include:-
● A fatalistic attitude - believing that you cannot change your prospects.
● The need for immediate rather than deferred graduation - those in the working class often prefer
to enter the workforce immediately rather than attain higher education since the job will provide a
wage immediately even though a higher education could lead to higher paid jobs in the future.
● Loyalty - some may think that it is unfair to others if they move up the social ladder.
● The absence of role models who promote education - there might not be any people who received
benefits from education in the community which could mean that families might see it as
unimportant and unnecessary.
However, the existence of a working class culture has been questioned. Many parents do see the
importance of education but may lack the knowledge upper class people hold. They may also lack cultural
capital.
- Culture Capital: comprises the social assets of a person such as tastes, values and behaviors. The
advantages a parent with cultural capital can give to their child can be a familiarity and love of
books, visiting museums and knowing the importance of education.
Through Culture Capital parents would also know how the school system works and how to use it to their
advantage.
Ethnicity:-
A person’s culture and ethnic background can deeply affect how they approach school. Louise Archer, a
British sociologist, researched why Chinese pupils excelled in comparison to other pupils. She found that
Chinese families put a greater emphasis and importance on education and enforced a necessity to excel. A
student she interviewed described it to be as such, White children are told to try their best while Chinese
children are told to be the best.
Gender:-
Boys and girls are socialized into different gender roles which stay with them as they enter school age.
Boys think in terms of attaining a high paying career in the future which makes them more likely to work
hard and enter a good university. Girls believe they are destined for motherhood and marriage, making
them think that achieving high grades isn't necessary.
This is changing nowadays and girls are encouraged to pursue a career and the emphasis on marriage and
motherhood has decreased.
Linguistic Influences
Social Class:-
Sociologist Basil Bernstein divided language into two types; restricted code and elaborated code.
● Restricted Code: a form of language spoken with family and close friends which is usually
informal.
● Elaborated Code: a form of language used in careful explanation and detail which is usually
formal.
He further suggested that due to culture capital, middle and upper class children have an easier time than
working class children in terms of speaking in elaborated code. This ability can make them seem more
able or talented in the eyes of teachers and gives them a competitive advantage.
Ethnicity:-
Students who are part of a ethnic minority may have a different native language. Due to this, they may
have difficulty understanding the teacher and by extension, the lesson. This might also affect their accent
and pronunciation in the host language. Teacher’s might deem how they speak the language inappropriate.
These problems mean that a student might be underachieving even if they have the capacity to understand
and succeed.
The influence of school, teachers, pupil subcultures and the peer group on educational
achievement.
Social Class:-
Studies have shown that good schools make a significant difference in a student’s academics. Features of
a good school include:
● Teachers are well prepared
● Teachers focus on rewards and praise rather than sanctions
● There is a mixture of abilities
Research has also suggested that the teacher-student relationship can also influence educational
achievements. Teachers often have a stereotype of the ideal student based on dressing, speech and
conduct. While middle class students are more likely to meet this stereotype, working class students might
be perceived as lacking familial support or being disruptive.
The way students are perceived by their teachers can heavily affect their achievements. Suppose a teacher
sees a student as lazy, deviant and incapable of study. The student can take this criticism in two ways:-
● Self fulfilling prophecy: the student believes the criticism and believes that they can’t succeed,
causing them to underachieve.
● Self negating prophecy: the student takes the criticism as a challenge and works harder to prove
the teacher wrong causing their grades to improve.
Research by Rosenthal and Jacobson(1968) supported the idea of the self fulfilling prophecy. Students
who were praised and encouraged by teachers achieved higher progress than those who were negatively
labeled and those who weren’t labeled at all.
Students are also labeled through streaming which divides students based on their abilities. This causes
the same effects as teacher perception.
Ethnicity:-
Teachers often label students based on ethnicity which can possibly create a self fulfilling prophecy.
Students from certain ethnic minority groups are likely to be placed in lower level streams which can
negatively impact their self perception.
In the UK, African-Caribbean students are more susceptible to labeling and negative perceptions by
teachers. When students from these groups are labeled negatively such as being troublemakers, it can be
hard to escape from the stereotype and can eventually become the students' master status.
- Master Status: the defining characteristic of an individual and the single most important
describing aspect of the person, in the eyes of others. The person can eventually internalize this
status and believe it to be true.
Chinese and Indian students, on the other hand, have high expectations imposed on them. This means that
students may not be praised for their achievements and might not be offered help since they’re expected
to handle it on their own.
Gender:-
Female peer groups are more likely to be in tune with the school and learning and often support one
another during studies. Such peer groups are also more likely to spend time talking with one another
which can be more helpful than common male hobbies like sports and gaming since it helps with
language skills.
Boys are often surrounded by a masculinity culture which paints studying and working hard as feminine
meaning they often choose not to study due to the fear of appearing uncool and being ostracized by their
friend group.
Girls and boys both have stereotypes imposed on them. Boys are expected to be troublemakers and non
studious while girls are expected to be demure and focused. These stereotypes and labeling can cause a
self fulfilling prophecy.
Intelligence is measured through IQ tests which produce varying patterns in results. For example, middle
class students often achieve higher scores than working class pupils. More controversially, some
sociologists argue that there is a link between ethnicity and intelligence. There are problems with IQ tests
which means these opinions should be questioned:-
● IQ tests are not taken frequently even though intelligence develops meaning results should not be
trusted.
● Performance in IQ tests can be affected by the student’s mental or physical health at the time of
the test.
● Some who do not score high in IQ tests still succeed later in life.
● IQ tests only test logical intelligence meaning it might not represent true intelligence.
Hidden Curriculum
● The hidden curriculum consists of unspoken and implied topics that teach pupils values, norms
and beliefs of society.
● Features of a hidden curriculum:-
○ The physical structure of a teacher at front and rows of students at the back implies that
teachers are in control and have higher authority than students.
○ School rules and deadlines imply that you do what you are told by people of authority
even if you don't agree.
○ The emphasis on punctuality implies that time is not your own.
● Functionalists, Marxists and Feminists all agree to the existence of a hidden curriculum but differ
on the values it encompasses.
○ Functionalists believe that the hidden curriculum teaches skills and values necessary for
the smooth running of society.
○ Marxists believe that the hidden curriculum ensures the power of the ruling class and the
working class to remain passive and conforming.
○ Feminists believe the hidden curriculum encourages both boys and girls to conform to
traditional gender roles.
Vocationalism
● Vocational schools prepare students for a particular trade, craft or profession.
● In many countries, vocational schools have a lower status than traditional schooling and are often
associated with the working class.
● Governments have tried to prevent this phenomenon since they believe its necessary for some
people to enter the workforce earlier and partake in more manual jobs [which vocational schools
often prepare you for]
● Critics of vocationalism have argued:-
○ Pupils from these schools are used as a form of cheap labor under the guise of an
apprenticeship.
○ These schools are often used to occupy individuals without jobs in order to decrease the
unemployment rate.
○ The purpose of education shouldn’t be forming a workforce and should instead be
providing individuals with fulfilling futures which can only be done with a more varied
education.
Measurements of Crime
Official Statistics
● Official crime statistics measure the numbers of criminals and offenders in an area.
● Crime statistics are often taken at face value and assumptions are made about the extent of crime
and characteristics of offenders. However, this data is socially constructed since the data only
represents the type of crime the statistician deems appropriate. Interprevists also argue that the
data tells more about the people who compiled them than the actual extent of criminal activity.
● The main sets of official statistics on crime include:
○ Police counts on different types of crime
○ Court records on the number of convictions for different crimes and characteristics of the
convicted.
● The crimes that are not detected and recorded in these statistics are termed the Dark Figure.
Self-reporting Studies
● Confidential surveys that ask the respondent about if and what type of crimes they have
committed.
● Since their identities are not revealed, criminals are more likely to mention their crimes which
provides a more valid extent of crime and means the dark figure isn’t nearly as large.
● Self reports often provide a different image than official statistics. While data from official
statistics says that most crime is caused by men and working class individuals, self reports show
that a significant number of women and middle class individuals commit crimes.
● However, as the respondent is not being observed, they are more likely to exaggerate, downplay
or lie about their crimes.
○ Some people might only mention trivial crimes like not paying for a train ticket meaning
the data might not represent serious offenses.
○ Most self report studies are conducted through adolescents meaning white collar crimes
and serious crimes like murder are usually ignored.
Victimization Studies
● Surveys that ask the respondent if they have been a victim of a crime, usually within the previous
year.
● Respondents are more likely to report crimes they have been a victim of rather than those they are
an offender of.
● However, these studies do not cover victimless crimes such as drug use or tax fraud.
○ Some topics may be sensitive to talk about leading to more under-reporting
○ The study relies on the victim’s memory. The victim might misremember some details or
may forget a crime that took place.
Social Class
Working class crime
● Official crime statistics suggest that most crimes are committed by working class individuals.
● Crime committed by the working class is also referred to as Blue Collar crime
● Some explanations for blue collar crime include:
○ They have been socialized into a different set of values.
○ They have a different culture which focuses on immediate gratification
○ Relative deprivation - a feeling that you are generally worse off than the people you
associate with and compare yourself to leading to a higher crime rate.
● Marxists argue that official statistics only show what has been defined as crime and the ruling
class decides the definition of crime. This means that the working class’ actions are criminalized
while the ruling class rarely faces punishment. The phenomenon is in favor of the bourgeoisie
because:-
○ By punishing individuals from the working class, the attention is driven away from the
true problem. It reinforces the belief that individuals, not institutions, are to blame for
social problems.
○ Neutralizes potential opposition since working class leaders can just be prosecuted for
crime and be imprisoned.
Gender
Female crimes
● Female crimes are often under-reported which can explain why official statistics show that female
crimes are not committed as often. Female dominant crimes such as prostitution and shoplifting
aren’t as visible as other crimes and offenders are usually good at evading detection. This shows
that while the number of female offenses is underestimated, the statistics regarding serious
offenses are fairly accurate.
● Some sociologists argue the Chivalry Factor which says that women are treated leniently in courts
due to them seeming weak. However some studies have shown that courts are in fact harder on
women since crime is considered “against their nature”.
● Early explanations of less crime committed by women included:-
○ Biological factors - the idea that crime is inherently masculine.
○ Social factors - the idea that men and women are raised differently which leads to
differences in crime rates. It also refers to the idea that girls behave in a ‘’masculine
way’’ because they lack role models.
● Early explanations of the phenomenon are disregarded by most if not all sociologists. Modern and
more common explanations include:-
○ Girls are not socialized into aggressive characteristics unlike boys.
○ Girls have fewer opportunities to commit crimes since they are unable to leave the home
in many cultures.
○ When at work, women are less likely to face situations where they can commit white
collar crimes.
● Crimes committed by women are increasing in recent years. This can be explained by factors
such as:-
○ Women are more likely to have higher positions in society and in the workplace which
gives more opportunities for occupational crimes.
○ Roles associated with men are now acceptable for women as well such as excess drinking
and rowdy behavior. Such aspects can lead to higher crime rates.
○ Women are now increasingly fighting patriarchal norms such as rejecting male
domination. This can also mean that they reject the rules and laws of a patriarchal society.
Male crimes
● The main argument for a high level of male crime is masculinity. Men try to show their
masculinity in various ways. They can show this through raising and providing for their families
but often, they turn to crime to compensate for their inability to provide.
● Examples of these attempts to show masculinity include:
○ Adventurous risk taking behavior - some behavior such as stealing or taking drugs are
considered crimes.
○ Asserting masculinity - they might try to display their power through violence against
others, most commonly domestic violence.
Ethnicity
● Official statistics show that minority groups commit a large proportion of crime despite their
numbers in the population, however, sociologists face a central problem in identifying whether
the statistics represent the actual crime rate or how the judicial systems deal with the suspected
offenders.
● The problems with assuming that statistics are correct and representative are:-
○ Victims might be biased and only report crimes committed by ethnic minorities due to
racial bias.
○ The police might target certain areas with ethnic majorities or might target people of a
certain ethnicity. This police pattern can mean that crimes by ethnic minorities are
recorded more often.
● Explanations for higher crime rates in ethnic minorities are:-
○ Marginalization and relative deprivation - when ethnic minorities are faced with
roadblocks in achieving goals such as education which can force people to turn to crime.
○ Racism and discrimination - when people consistently face racial discrimination, people
can turn to crime in order to rebel and take revenge.
○ Historical context - ethnic minorities whose ancestors faced colonialism might choose
crime as a way of showing their resentment and resistance.
● Much of the research on crime in the UK and US have been done on African-American and
African-Caribbean groups. Other minority groups might attract less attention since they are or
appear to be more law abiding. However, better explanations are that some ethnic minority groups
are closed off meaning they deal with their own crimes. Moreover, some minority groups might
have more economic success that protects them from prosecution.
Marxism
● Marxists believe that the ruling class creates laws that protect themselves and criminalize the
actions of the working class. They support the argument by pointing out that crimes involving
property are punished more severely than crimes of violence.
● Marxists say that law creation is as important as law enforcement and laws that limit inequality or
prevent exploitation need to be passed.
● A criticism of this view can be made by the fact that some laws are clearly in everyone's interests
or even against the ruling class’ interest such as health and safety laws which protect consumers
and can limit profits. However, marxists believe these laws are still in the ruling class’ favor like
health and safety laws help create a loyal, healthy workforce.
New Right
● Early longitudinal studies have shown that offenders are likely to be from poor or single-parent
families.
● New right sociologists extended the theory to say that changes in family structures have led to an
increase in crime. They compare traditional families to modern families and declare that the older
types of families provided stability and structure which helped prevent crime and deviance.
Changes in families include:-
○ Increases in cohabitation
○ Increases in divorce
○ Greater independence of women
○ Fewer male role models
● These changes influence younger people, especially young men, negatively and lead to a higher
level of crime since people no longer have a proper support system in the form of their family.
Relative Deprivation
● Material deprivation refers to a lack of basic material goods such as food or heating.
● Relative deprivation refers to feeling a lack of resources in comparison or relative to another
person/group.
● Marginalization refers to when groups do not have organizations or representatives to protect
their interests so they have no outlet for their anger leading to violence and crime.
● Some sociologists argued that people turn to crime due to marginalization and relative
deprivation. Offenders were often young men and victims were from the same community. They
argue that Marxists ignore that both offenders and victims are often from the working class and
crime was an important topic for victims meaning it couldn’t be written away as an invention of
the ruling class.
Labeling Theory
● Labeling: the ways people and certain acts are labeled as deviant.
● Labeling can give someone a master status that overrides all of their other characteristics. A
master status can also influence the person’s self image which can cause a self fulfilling prophecy
where individuals start committing deviant arts simply because they are labeled deviant.
● People who are labeled can also try to reject the role and prove society wrong.
● Sociologist Howard Becker applied the labeling theory to rule creation pointing out how some
laws are only created due to a change in labeling. For example, marijuana was legal in the US
until 1937 but as opinions changed and the drug was labeled deviant, the law relented and made it
illegal as well.
● Labeling is most likely to be effective when the label has power over those they label.
● Limitations:
○ Some acts are always deviant and are not affected by labeling such as murder.
○ The theory paints those who are labeled as victims but many choose to be deviant and
prefer to adhere to their label.
○ The theory does not explain why some people are labeled more than others.
Masculinity
● Masculinity: attitudes and behaviors expected and associated from men.
● Statistics of all kinds show that men commit more crime and more serious crime than women.
Masculinity is used to explain this phenomenon.
● The dominant form of masculinity is hegemonic masculinity. This involves:
○ Controlling all emotions except anger especially in public.
○ Being physically strong
○ Being competitive.
○ Being willing to use violence
● As boys grow up, they are socialized into masculinity culture. Boys are labeled effeminate if they
do not show at least some aspects of hegemonic masculinity and can be bullied. This is why boys
over attempt to show their masculinity which can lead to juvenile crime. Such behavior in boys is
often written down as ‘’boys being boys’’ which can lead to boys being adult offenders in the
future and committing serious crimes.
● Girls are also socialized into certain values such as valuing appearance but this culture does not
lead to deviance.
● Criticisms of masculinity as an explanation of crime:
○ Assumes that all men are socialized into hegemonic masculinity.
○ Some aspects of masculinity such as protecting the weak are positive and do not lead to
crime.
○ Assumes that all men conform to hegemonic masculinity.