0% found this document useful (0 votes)
144 views18 pages

Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing Q&A

Uploaded by

ahmedalgushi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
144 views18 pages

Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing Q&A

Uploaded by

ahmedalgushi
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

ASNT

Q&A
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
BOOK

MAGNE T IC
FLU X
L E AK AGE
T EST ING
Levels I, II, and III Review Questions
Book MF

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
The American Society for Nondestructive Testing Inc.

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The American Society for Nondestructive Testing Inc. is grateful for the volunteer contributions, technical expertise,
knowledge, and dedication of the following individuals who have helped make this work possible.
Technical Reviewers Publications Review Committee
Timothy S. Roach, Technical Editor Joseph Mackin
Martin T. Anderson, Technical Editor Martin T. Anderson
Mark R. Pompe
Danny L. Keck
Ravindran Krishnamurthy
Joseph Mackin
Hari Muthuswami
Russ Pack
Hussein Sadek
Ram P. Samy

Copyright © 2020 by The American Society for Nondestructive Testing.

The American Society for Nondestructive Testing Inc. (ASNT) is not responsible for the authenticity or accuracy of information herein. Published opin-
ions and statements do not necessarily reflect the opinion of ASNT. Products or services that are advertised or mentioned do not carry the endorse-
ment or recommendation of ASNT.

No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form, by means electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording
or otherwise, without the expressed prior written permission of The American Society for Nondestructive Testing Inc.

IRRSP, NDT Handbook, The NDT Technician, and [Link] are trademarks of The American Society for Nondestructive Testing Inc. ACCP, ASNT, Level
III Study Guide, Materials Evaluation, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, Research in Nondestructive Evaluation, and RNDE are registered trade-
marks of The American Society for Nondestructive Testing Inc.

first printing 08/20


ebook 08/20

Errata, if available for this printing, may be obtained from ASNT’s website, [Link]. Ebooks contain all corrections and updates, including the latest
errata.

ISBN: 978-1-57117-467-3 (print)


ISBN: 978-1-57117-468-0 (ebook)

Printed in the United States of America.

Published by:
The American Society for Nondestructive Testing Inc.
1711 Arlingate Lane
Columbus, OH 43228-0518
[Link]

Publications Team:

Toni Kervina, Director of Publications

Editorial:
Cynthia M. Leeman, Educational Materials Supervisor

Production:
Joy Grimm, Production Manager
Synthia Jester, Graphic Artist/Illustrator

ASNT Mission Statement:


ASNT exists to create a safer world by advancing scientific, engineering, and technical knowledge in the field of nondestructive testing.

Code of Ethics:
The ASNT Code of Ethics was developed to provide members of the Society with broad ethical statements to guide their professional lives. In spirit
and in word, each ASNT member is responsible for knowing and adhering to the values and standards set forth in the Society’s Code. More infor-
mation, as well as the complete version of the Code of Ethics, can be found on ASNT’s website, [Link].

ii

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
Contents
Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ii
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iv
Recommended References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iv
Reference Codes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iv
Reference Usage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iv
Level I – Review Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
Answers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3
Level II – Review Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Answers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
Level III – Review Questions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9
Answers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12

iii

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
References
Recommended References In this example, the letter “A” refers to Reference A in the
list above and 95 is the specific page in Reference A where
The following references were used in formulating the ques-
the answer to the question is located.
tions in this book.
Reference A
Reference Usage
ASNT, 2008, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, Vol. 8:
Magnetic Testing, third edition, The American Society for Total Reference A Total = 13
Nondestructive Testing, Columbus, OH. Level I (7)
Reference B Level II (1)
ASNT, 2004, Nondestructive Testing Handbook, Vol. 5: Level III (5)
Electromagnetic Testing, third edition, The American
Society for Nondestructive Testing, Columbus, OH. Reference B Total = 19
Reference C Level I (8)
ASNT, 2010, MFL Compendium: Articles on Magnetic Flux Level II (0)
Leakage, The American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Level III (11)
Columbus, OH. Reference C Total = 9
Reference D
Level I (2)
ASNT, 2017, Magnetic Particle Classroom Training Book, Level II (5)
The American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Level III (2)
Columbus, OH.
Reference E Reference D Total = 3
ASNT, 2018, Electromagnetic Testing Classroom Training Level I (1)
Book, The American Society for Nondestructive Testing, Level II (1)
Columbus, OH. Level III (1)
Reference F
Reference E Total = 44
Bray, D.E., and R.K. Stanley, 1996, Nondestructive
Evaluation: A Tool In Design Manufacturing and Service, Level I (17)
CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, FL. Level II (24)
Level III (3)
Reference G
ASM, 2018, ASM Handbook, Volume 17: Nondestructive Reference F Total = 5
Evaluation of Materials, ASM International, Materials Park, Level I (0)
OH. Level II (0)
Reference Codes Level III (5)
Each question in this book is followed by letter(s) and page Reference G Total = 2
number(s) indicating the specific recommended reference
where the answer may be found. For example: Level I (0)
Level II (0)
Level III (2)
12. Which of the following is a diamagnetic material?

a. Cobalt.
b. Nickel.
c. Silver.
d. Iron.
A.95

iv

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
Level I
Review Questions

1. Magnetic flux leakage testing (MFL) will most easily 6. Magnetic flux leakage is most reluctant to travel in:
detect changes in the following materials:
a. high-carbon steel.
a. paramagnetic. b. air.
b. nonferromagnetic. c. ferromagnetic materials.
c. ferromagnetic. d. diamagnetic materials.
d. diamagnetic.
D.165
A.8; E.7
7. MFL search coils detect a change in the material
2. In NDT, the term “method” refers to: because:
a. a group of techniques that share a common a. at a discontinuity the flux leakage is forced out of
probing energy. the material and into the air.
b. the order in which the work is completed. b. the temperature of the flux field changes.
c. a group of procedures detailing the work. c. a harmonic vibration is established.
d. a strategy to accomplish the inspection. d. the polarity rapidly changes.
B.2 E.19

3. Which of the following is strictly considered a 8. Hall effect sensors are:


“surface” method?
a. nonconductive material.
a. Radiographic testing. b. ferromagnetic material.
b. Magnetic flux leakage testing. c. semiconductor material.
c. Ultrasonic testing. d. wound carbon material.
d. Liquid penetrant testing.
E.50
B.5, 6
9. A document that provides recommendations for the
4. When testing thin-wall steel pipe with MFL, the qualification and certification of NDT test personnel
indication may be detected: is:
a. in the middle of the pipe wall. a. ANSI/ASNT CP-105.
b. on the outer surface. b. ASQ-2121.
c. near the long seam. c. ISO 7928.
d. on the inside and outside diameters. d. SNT-TC-1A.
C.11; E.192 B.16; E.219

5. A unit of magnetic flux density is the: 10. Which of the following is a flux-sensing device that is
dependent on some sort of time variation of field
a. henry.
intensity?
b. tesla.
c. oersted. a. Search coil.
d. ohm. b. Magnetodiode.
A.34 Table 7 c. Transducer.
d. Ferroprobe.
A.143; E.82

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing l Level i

11. A coil is a passive device and follows whose law in 17. What is the major factor that affects the amount of
the presence of a magnetic field? flux leakage?
a. Hellier’s Law. a. The size of the discontinuity.
b. Faraday’s Law. b. The depth of the discontinuity.
c. Gauss’ Law. c. The orientation of the discontinuity in relation to
d. Weber’s Law. the direction of the flux lines.
B.388 d. The age of the test piece.
A.48
12. Which of the following is a diamagnetic material?
18. One tesla is equal to:
a. Cobalt.
b. Nickel. a. 100 weber
c. Silver. b. 10 gauss
d. Iron. c. 10 000 gauss
A.95 d. 440 oersted
E.42
13. The distance of a sensing coil from a test surface is
called the: 19. The only theoretical difference between magnetic
particle testing and MFL is:
a. liftoff.
b. buffer. a. the use of sensors for detection of the flux
c. lag gap. leakage.
d. gauss void. b. the way to induce magnetism into the part.
E.218 c. the direction of the magnetic field to the
discontinuity to be detected.
14. Flux leakage changes can be detected with which of d. false indications are eliminated with MFL.
the following coils? A.140; E.7
a. Fluxer. 20. When using an MFL scanning unit and a coil as the
b. Absolute. sensor, a change in scanning speed will have a major
c. Halt. effect on what property?
d. Exciter.
E.81, 215 a. Voltage induced in the coil.
b. Noise reduction.
15. A solid-state sensor of magnetic flux leakage is the: c. False indication enhancement.
d. Retentivity.
a. bridge probe.
b. hall effect probe. B.388
c. differential probe. 21. As material thickness increases, the flux density
d. bobbin probe. decreases. This will also decrease the:
B.152; E.83
a. liftoff.
16. A magnetic alternating current (AC) bridge is b. flux leakage.
usually made of what type of material? c. inspection time.
d. resistance.
a. Low permeability.
b. Paramagnetic. E.193
c. Diamagnetic. 22. MFL pipeline pig inspection can detect:
d. High permeability.
C.107 a. internal linings.
b. external coatings.
c. unburied pipe.
d. internal and external corrosion.
E.20

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
Review Questions

23. Another word for probe is: 27. In order to produce a voltage in the pickup coil:
a. transducer. a. the pickup coil must be energized with direct
b. inducer. current (DC).
c. test tip. b. the pickup coil must be energized with
d. flux generator. alternating current (AC).
B.128, 508 c. the flux density passing through the pickup coil
must be changing.
24. While performing a magnetic flux leakage test d. the pickup coil must be connected to an
utilizing a search coil, an increase in the flux leakage amplifier.
will result in what in the coil? E.82
a. Resistance. 28. Ferrites are used with pickup coils to:
b. Amperage.
c. Liftoff. a. provide a wear surface to protect the pickup coil.
d. Voltage. b. concentrate the flux density through the pickup
B.156, Eq. 18 coil.
c. concentrate the amperage output of the pickup
25. With a hall effect sensor, the output is proportional coil.
to the: d. add electrical conductivity of the detection
a. thickness of the hall effect sensor. assembly.
b. cycles per second. E.81
c. magnetic flux density.
d. inverse square law. 29. Which of the following has the greatest effect on the
voltage output of a pickup coil?
A.147
a. Gauge size of the wire in the coil.
26. If the degree of magnetization is too low,
b. Shape of the coil.
discontinuities may:
c. Temperature of the coil.
a. result in false indications. d. Rate of change of the flux density through the
b. go undetected. coil.
c. disappear during test. E.82
d. appear sharp and defined.
E.177

Answers
1c 2a 3d 4d 5b 6d 7a 8c 9d 10a 11b 12c 13a 14b
15b 16d 17c 18c 19a 20a 21b 22d 23a 24d 25c 26b 27c 28b
29d

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
LEVEL II
Review Questions

1. The MFL method is applicable to: 6. Which one of the following types of magnets could
be easily adjusted?
a. ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic materials.
b. ferromagnetic materials. a. Rare earth magnets.
c. nonferromagnetic materials. b. Inductive magnets.
d. paramagnetic materials. c. Electromagnets.
d. Resistive magnets.
E.39, 183
E.188
2. To detect gradual wall loss, which of the following
detectors must be used? 7. By comparison, which magnets would be excessively
bulky and heavy?
a. Coils.
b. Hall effect. a. Powerful rare earth magnets.
c. Permanent magnets. b. Inductive magnets.
d. Piezoelectric transducers. c. Electromagnets.
d. Resistive magnets.
E.183
E.188
3. To detect sharp discontinuities, which of the
following detectors must be used? 8. Which system should be used for inspecting
petroleum and gas pipelines?
a. Coils.
b. Hall effect. a. Tank floor scanner.
c. Permanent magnets. b. Smart pig.
d. Piezoelectric transducers. c. Tube scanner.
d. Magnetodiode.
E.183
E.178
4. Which one of the following materials is not used as a
permanent magnet? 9. An MFL wire rope inspection will detect:

a. Neodymium. a. cross-sectional area loss only.


b. Iron-boron. b. internal and external broken wires only.
c. Copper. c. cross-sectional loss and internal/external broken
d. Samarium cobalt. wires.
d. cross-sectional loss, internal/external broken
E.178
wires, and tensile strain.
5. What type of test is MFL? E.184

a Qualitative.
10. One of the systems used to inspect round bars is:
b. Quantitative.
c. Paramagnetic. a. pipe scanner.
d. Diamagnetic. b. differential pair of magnetodiodes.
E.188 c. saturation system.
d. remote field electromagnetic testing.
E.185

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing l level ii

11. Which type of magnet is normally used in smart 15. In a magnetizing coil, the strength of the magnetic
pigs? field is dependent upon:
a. Electromagnet. a. only the number of turns in the coil.
b. Permanent magnet. b. the number of turns in the coil and its length.
c. Magnetodiode. c. only the magnitude of the current.
d. Hall effect magnet. d. the number of turns in the coil and the
E.178 magnitude of the current.
E.43
12. In the heat exchanger tubes inspection, the system
would have: 16. The magnetic properties and hysteresis loops are
affected by:
a. one magnet and two inductive coil sensors.
b. one magnet and one inductive coil sensor. a. the number of wraps in the coil.
c. two magnets and one inductive coil sensor. b. the microstructure of the material.
d. two magnets and two inductive coil sensors. c. the current in the magnetizing coil.
E.183 d. the distance from the magnetization to the part.
E.47
13. Which of the following materials may be used for the
conductor in Figure 1? 17. Which of the following flux leakage sensing elements
is equivalent to a flux gate magnetometer?
a. Ceramic.
b. Glass. a. Inductive coils.
c. HDPE. b. Hall effect sensors.
d. Aluminum. c. Ferroprobes.
A.126; D.11 d. Magnetodiodes.
E.84

18. An energized semiconductor that varies the voltage


across two faces of its crystal base on the flux density
of a magnetic field passing through it is:
a. an inductive coil.
b. a hall effect sensor.
c. a ferroprobe.
d. a magnetodiode.
Tube E.83

19. What kind of sensor is a solid-state device, the


resistance of which changes with magnetic field
Conductor
intensity?
a. Inductive coil.
b. Hall effect sensor.
c. Flux gate magnetometer.
Figure 1 d. Magnetodiode.
E.84

14. How do the lines of force outside of a magnet travel? 20. To detect perturbations in a static magnetic field,
a. East to west. which kind of sensors must have relative motion
b. South to north. between the sensor and the field (such that flux
c. North to south. within the sensor changes)?
d. West to east. a. Inductive coils.
E.41 b. Hall effect sensors.
c. Ferroprobes.
d. Magnetodiodes.
E.81

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
Review Questions

21. A reduction in the permeability in a part, together 26. In order to discriminate indications between the top
with an increase in the magnetic flux density, causes: and bottom sides in aboveground storage tank floor
inspections, it is convenient to use:
a. the flux to leak into the surrounding medium.
b. the hall effect sensor to read a zero value. a. ultrasonic testing (UT).
c. the value ampere/meter not to show changes. b. eddy current testing.
d. the inductive coil sensor to read a zero value. c. leak testing (LT).
E.175 d. radiographic testing (RT).
C.39
22. Magnetization that is too strong may:
27. The MFL inspection of wire rope is a:
a. result in excessive magnetic noise.
b. go unnoticed. a. surface only test.
c. disappear during testing. b. quantitative test.
d. not exist due to saturation. c. qualitative test.
E.177 d. center test.
C.1, 68
23. Typical MFL equipment carries 32 sensors. Each
sensor generates an electronic signal that is sampled 28. Magnetodiode is a solid-state device that:
at 4 KHz. How many data points must be processed
every second? a. changes resistance as magnetic field intensity
changes.
a. 8000 b. changes inductance as magnetic field intensity
b. 128 000 changes.
c. 125 c. changes impedance as magnetic field intensity
d. 128 changes.
C.13 d. changes permeability as magnetic field intensity
changes.
24. In an inspection with an MFL scanner on
aboveground storage tank floors, signal response is E.51, 84
significantly higher from indications generated from 29. When using magnetodiodes for tube inspection, the
the: flux leakage is excited by:
a. topside. a. full-wave rectified AC.
b. bottom side. b. half-wave AC.
c. topside and bottom side are similar. c. DC.
d. sensor liftoff. d. AC.
C.27
E.86
25. The evaluation of aboveground storage tank floor 30. The ratio between flux density and the magnetic field
indications is generally done with: strength is expressed as:
a. liquid penetrant testing (PT).
a. frequency/gauss.
b. radiographic testing (RT).
b. B/H.
c. magnetic particle testing (MT).
d. ultrasonic testing (UT). c. average flux line strength × number of flux lines.
C.27 d. amperes × number of turns in the coil.
E.46

Answers
1b 2b 3a 4c 5a 6c 7c 8b 9c 10b 11b 12a 13d 14c
15d 16b 17c 18b 19d 20a 21a 22a 23b 24b 25d 26b 27c 28a
29d 30b

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
8

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
LEVEL III
Review Questions

1. Which of the following flux-sensitive devices has the 4. In the MFL of wire rope, a system using an annular
major advantage of not requiring movement coil with integrator is frequently used. (See Figure 3.)
(scanning) to detect and evaluate a leakage field? What is the main reason for using such a system?
a. Long straight wire passing through a magnetic a. To compensate for the influence of testing speed
field. variations.
b. Search coil. b. To find the radial location of wire breaks.
c. Search coil derivative. c. To detect small cracks inside the rope.
d. Hall element. d. To detect cross-sectional area changes.
A.143 B.438–439

2. Using Figure 2, which of the following best describes


the signal produced in a search coil, with its plane
parallel to the part surface, at slot A when compared Integrator
to slot B?
a. It is wider. N S Tested rope
b. It is narrow.
c. It has the same amplitude.
d. It has a lower amplitude.
N S
B.235

Search coil
Figure 3

Travel
5. During an MFL test using peak-to-peak signal
5 mm (0.2 in.) 5 mm (0.2 in.) processing for imperfection severity, it is possible to
encounter false positives. This would mean:
5 mm 10 mm a. that rejectable defects are likely to be missed due
(0.2 in.) (0.4 in.) to incorrect signal processing.
Slot A Slot B b. that acceptable imperfections are marked as
rejects by the incorrect signal processing.
Figure 2 c. that the rectified signals lose intensity during
processing.
d. that the rectified signals gain intensity during
processing.
3. Which devices are used to detect flux leakage? C.11
a. Coils, hall probes, and magnetodiodes. 6. A discontinuity having an inclined angle to the
b. Coils, hall probes, and transistors. surface has a flux leakage that is:
c. Piezoelectric crystals, hall probes, and
magnetodiodes. a. asymmetrical.
d. Piezoelectric crystals, transistors, and b. equal to a similar normal discontinuity.
magnetodiodes. c. higher than a similar normal discontinuity.
F.311 d. the same as a similar normal discontinuity.
A.140
9

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing l level iii

7. Eddy current shielding, the name given to the 11. What has the most influence on the magnetic
unidirectional eddy current flow in products properties of steel?
inspected by MFL, is caused by:
a. Chemistry, microstructure, and grain size.
a. the interaction between the test magnetic field b. Cross-sectional area, microstructure, and heat
and a residual field in the product. treatment.
b. fluctuations in the DC magnetizing current. c. Cross-sectional area, grain size, and chemistry.
c. rapidly occurring flux changes in the product d. Heat treatment and length.
created by the rotation of the magnetic field. A.56
d. rapidly occurring impedance changes in the
pickup coils. 12. If a ferromagnetic part is energized with a DC
F.280–282 encircling coil to the point of magnetic saturation,
and the current is turned off, what point in Figure 4
8. Too high a rotational test speed or too high active will represent the result?
pole rotating head speed can cause the loss of an
indication from an inside diameter (ID) a. R
discontinuity. What can this be attributed to? b. B+
c. H–
a. Excessive generated surface noise. d. P
b. Limitations of the flux sensor elements. E.45
c. Eddy current shielding.
d. Reverse magnetization effect.
F.280–282
B+
For questions 9 and 10, use the following
formula: P

R
RPM  detector length  number of detectors
linear speed (per minute) = H– H+
percentage of coverage

Note: detector length and linear speed must be in the same


units (inches, feet, meters).
B–
9. What is the maximum throughput speed per minute
for a 100% inspection coverage of a flux leakage pipe
inspection system with two inspection heads, each Figure 4
having 152 mm (6 in.) long detectors and rotating at
180 rpm on a 178 mm (7 in.) diameter tube?
13. What is the SI unit for magnetic flux density?
a. 201 m (660 ft)
b. 55 m (180 ft) a. Weber.
c. 49 m (162 ft) b. Gauss.
d. 27 m (90 ft) c. Tesla.
G.564
d. Ampere.
B.507
10. What throughput speed per minute provides 110%
inspection coverage of a flux leakage pipe inspection 14. What is the SI unit for magnetic field strength?
system with two inspection heads, each having
a. Weber.
152 mm (6 in.) long detectors and rotating at
b. Tesla.
180 rpm on a 178 mm (7 in.) diameter pipe?
c. Ampere.
a. 60 m (198 ft) d. Ampere per meter.
b. 49 m (162 ft) B.498
c. 45 m (146 ft)
d. 25 m (81 ft)
G.564

10

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
Review Questions

15. When inspecting wire rope, the annular coil 20. When comparing magnetic field intensities of MFL
approach measures: and MT, which best describes the relationship?
a. the magnetic flux in the rope locally. a. Field intensities are higher in MFL than in MT.
b. the normal component of flux leakage. b. Field intensities are the same as for both.
c. the tangential component of flux leakage. c. Field intensities are lower in electronic flux
d. the voltage induced in the rope locally. leakage than for MT.
B.438, 439 d. There is no relationship.
A.142
16. A flux gate magnetometer is a device that measures
fields by utilizing: 21. Which of the following is a factor in determining flux
leakage?
a. linear magnetic characteristics of ferromagnetic
core materials. a. Probe surface speed.
b. linear magnetic characteristic of b. Density of the materials.
nonferromagnetic core materials. c. Chemistry of the material.
c. nonlinear magnetic characteristic of d. Relative permeability of the materials.
nonferromagnetic core materials. B.238
d. nonlinear magnetic characteristic of
ferromagnetic core materials. 22. The sensitivity of a pickup coil is improved by:
E.84 a. lengthening the coil.
b. widening the coil.
17. A ferromagnetic part can be demagnetized by: c. using a ferrite core.
a. keeping its temperature below the curie point. d. using a diamagnetic core.
b. withdrawing the part from a DC coil. B.236
c. increasing the applied field.
d. alternately reversing and reducing the applied 23. The only component of the flux leakage detected by a
field. search coil is:
D.85 a. parallel to the axis of the coil (or perpendicular to
the plane of the coil).
18. When performing a flux leakage inspection of b. perpendicular to the axis of the coil (or parallel to
aboveground storage tanks, interpreting indications the plane of the coil).
normally involves: c. the 45° vector field.
a. signal amplitude only. d. the internal field normal to the axis of the coil.
b. signal width only. B.235
c. visual and ultrasonic evaluation.
d. signal amplitude and width. 24. The reduction in cross-sectional area caused by a
discontinuity causes:
B.389
a. an increase in the internal flux density of the part.
19. Permeability of a material can be numerically written b. a decrease in the internal flux density of the part.
as: c. no change in the internal flux density of the part.
a. RIB. d. a reversal of direction in the magnetic field at the
b. B/H. reduction in cross-sectional area.
c. Hc/Hb. B.48
d. ampere turns/number of turns.
E.46

11

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing l level iii

25. When using search coils to reduce or eliminate the 27. Permanent magnets are usually made from alloys of
signal from long, nonrelevant indications such as the what type of material?
weld trim of electric welded pipe, which coil
configuration would give the best advantage? a. Low carbon.
b. Alloys of cobalt and nickel.
a. Lengthen the coil. c. Super ferrites.
b. Widen the coil. d. Tungsten carbides.
c. Use a ferrite core. A.45
d. Link two coils wound in opposite directions in
the series. 28. An engine burn fracture is associated with what type
F.323 of MFL inspection?

26. What is the function of ASTM International? a. Tank bottoms.


b. Wire rope.
a. To provide guidance for material management. c. Rail.
b. To provide direction for qualification of NDT d. Pipelines.
personnel. C.54
c. To provide requirements for ET, MT, and MFL.
d. To provide standards for the establishment of test
techniques.
B.16

Answers
1d 2b 3a 4d 5b 6a 7c 8c 9b 10b 11a 12d 13c 14d
15a 16d 17d 18c 19b 20a 21d 22c 23a 24a 25d 26d 27b 28c

12

ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]
The American Society for Catalog Number: 10122
Nondestructive Testing Inc. ISBN: 978-1-57117-467-3
ASNT grants non-exclusive, non-transferable license of this material to Bassam AbdElFattah AbdelAzeem.
All rights reserved. © ASNT 2024. To report unauthorized use, contact: customersupport@[Link]

Common questions

Powered by AI

Material properties such as permeability, electrical conductivity, and microstructure significantly influence flux leakage characteristics in MFL testing. High permeability materials, typically ferromagnetic, are more conducive to maintaining a magnetic field and exhibiting distinct flux leakage at discontinuities . Conversely, materials with lower permeability or non-magnetic properties show reduced flux leakage, challenging detection sensitivity . The microstructure affects flux flow paths, influencing the depth and size of indications detected, thereby affecting interpretation . Thus, a thorough understanding of material properties is essential for effective MFL testing.

Coil sensor parameters such as the number of turns, core material, and size directly influence MFL testing effectiveness. Increasing the number of turns enhances sensitivity by improving the coil’s ability to pick up changes in magnetic flux, allowing finer detection of discontinuities . The core material, especially if it's ferromagnetic, can significantly enhance the coil’s magnetic properties, improving detection sensitivity . The size and geometry of the coil determine its spatial resolution and the area it can effectively monitor, affecting the precision in locating and characterizing defects.

Signal processing plays a crucial role in enhancing MFL data interpretation by filtering noise, amplifying genuine signal features, and distinguishing real defects from artifacts. Techniques such as filtering, amplitude modulation, and frequency analysis are employed to clean data, enhancing feature extraction and defect characterization . Advanced processing algorithms can also leverage machine learning models to recognize patterns and improve predictive accuracy and efficiency . Thus, signal processing is pivotal for turning raw sensor data into actionable insights for decision-making in industrial contexts.

Magnetic saturation significantly impacts NDE methods like magnetic particle testing by limiting the increase in magnetic field strength and potentially reducing the effectiveness of detecting surface and subsurface discontinuities. Once saturation is reached, any further application of magnetizing force does not increase the degree of magnetization, leading to diminished detection sensitivity because additional defects may not cause enough magnetic disturbance to be visible . This limits the indication clarity for further defects leading to potential missed identifications. Controlling saturation levels is thus critical to maintaining detection sensitivity.

Conducting MFL inspections on wire ropes presents unique challenges compared to solid materials due to their complex geometry and variable thickness. The rope’s cylindrical construction causes rapid flux leakage changes, making it difficult to maintain consistent proximity and inspection conditions across its length . Additionally, the mobility of individual wires within the rope can create dynamic conditions that affect signal interpretation, requiring advanced signal processing techniques to differentiate real defects from noise and artifacts . These factors necessitate highly sensitive sensors and skilled interpretation for accurate MFL inspections of wire ropes.

The choice of sensor type in MFL testing significantly impacts detection capabilities. Inductive coils, Hall effect sensors, and flux gate magnetometers each offer different advantages. Inductive coils require motion between the sensor and the magnetic field to detect changes in flux, making them suitable for dynamic applications . Hall effect sensors, being semiconductor-based, are excellent for detecting static magnetic fields without requiring motion, enhancing detection in stable environments . Flux gate magnetometers, utilizing nonlinear magnetic characteristics, offer high sensitivity and precision for detecting minor flux changes . Selecting the appropriate sensor type aligns with the specific detection needs and conditions of the inspection task.

The use of Hall effect sensors in electromagnetic testing provides several advantages, including high accuracy in measuring magnetic fields and the ability to detect static fields without relative motion, which is beneficial in stable testing environments . However, such sensors have limitations, including their susceptibility to temperature variations, which can affect accuracy, and a generally lower frequency response compared to inductive coils. They are also less effective in detecting rapid changes in flux due to their inherent operational principles . These factors must be balanced against the specific requirements of the testing environment.

Liftoff effects, or the gap between the sensor and the test surface, are critical in MFL testing as they influence the magnitude of the detected signal. Increased liftoff can diminish signal strength, leading to reduced sensitivity and potentially missed detections of minor discontinuities. This is because the magnetic field strength decreases with distance, weakening the flux leakage signal . Additionally, liftoff variations can introduce noise and inaccuracies, complicating signal interpretation. Therefore, minimizing and controlling liftoff is essential for consistent and accurate results in MFL testing.

Magnetization intensity in MFL testing is crucial as it affects the sensitivity and detection capability of the inspection. High magnetization can enhance the signal response, making it easier to detect flux leakage at discontinuities. However, if the magnetization is too strong, it may lead to saturation where additional increase provides no greater benefit, and it may introduce excessive noise, complicating the interpretation of signals . Thus, achieving the right level of magnetization is essential for optimal performance in MFL testing.

Interpreting MFL signals in aboveground storage tank inspections involves evaluating both the signal amplitude and width. These characteristics help discern between different types of discontinuities and their severity. Signal amplitude often correlates with the depth and size of a defect, while the width can provide clues about the extent and nature of the defect . Additionally, considerations such as liftoff effects and the material properties must be accounted for to ensure accurate interpretation.

You might also like