Constitution of India, Law and
Engineering
1
INDEX
TOPIC
Introduction
Constitutional Provisions:
Article 356
Effects on the State Executive
Effects on the State
Legislature
Impact on the Federal
Structure
Judicial Review and
Safeguards
Criticism and Misuse
Conclusion
2
Introduction
The President's Rule, also known as a 'State
Emergency' or 'Constitutional Emergency,' is one of the
most powerful provisions in the Indian Constitution that
impacts the governance of a state. It represents a
temporary but complete shift in the federal balance
of power, bringing the state under the direct control of
the Union Government.
Concept: It is the suspension of the State
Government and the imposition of direct rule by
the Central Government in a state.
Constitutional Basis: It is primarily invoked
under Article 356 of the Constitution of India,
which deals with the 'failure of constitutional
machinery in State.'
Purpose: The original intent was to act as a
safety valve to preserve the democratic and
constitutional structure of the state and the unity
of the nation. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar had hoped it
would remain a "dead letter" (used rarely).
The Query: This assignment focuses specifically
on the consequences of this imposition, detailing
the practical effects it has on the governance
machinery—the executive, the legislature, and the
overall administrative functioning of the state.
3
Constitutional Provisions: Article
356
Article 356 grants the President the power to issue a
proclamation imposing President's Rule. This power is
exercised based on certain conditions and provisions.
2.1. Grounds for Proclamation
The President can proclaim an emergency if they are
satisfied that a situation has arisen where the
government of the state cannot be carried on in
accordance with the provisions of the
Constitution. This satisfaction can be reached in two
ways:
1. On the basis of a report from the Governor of
the State.
2. Otherwise, i.e., based on information or discretion
available to the President (acting on the aid and
advice of the Union Council of Ministers).
2.2. Article 365: Failure to Comply with Union
Directions
Another ground is provided under Article 365, which
states that if any state fails to comply with or give
effect to any directions given by the Union in the
exercise of its executive power, the President may
lawfully hold that a situation has arisen in which the
government of the state cannot be carried on in
accordance with the provisions of the Constitution.
4
5
Constitutional Provisions (Cont.)
2.3. Parliamentary Approval and Duration
The proclamation imposing President's Rule is not
permanent and is subject to parliamentary oversight.
Initial Approval: A proclamation must be laid
before both Houses of Parliament and must be
approved by both Houses within two months from
its date of issue.
Duration: Once approved, it remains in force for
six months.
Maximum Extension: It can be extended for a
maximum period of three years with the approval
of Parliament every six months.
Limitation beyond one year (44th
Amendment Act, 1978): Beyond one year, it can
only be extended if two conditions are met:
1. A National Emergency is in operation in the
whole or any part of India/State.
2. The Election Commission of India (ECI)
certifies that the general elections to the
Legislative Assembly cannot be held due to
difficulties.
2.4. Revocation
A proclamation can be revoked at any time by a
subsequent proclamation of the President. Importantly,
Parliament's approval is not required for revocation
6
7
Effects on the State Executive
The imposition of President's Rule causes the most
drastic and immediate changes in the Executive wing
of the state government.
3.1. Dismissal of the Council of Ministers
The State Council of Ministers, led by the Chief
Minister, is dismissed.
This is a direct suspension of the democratic and
responsible government in the state.
3.2. Assumption of Functions by the President
The President, by proclamation, assumes to himself
all or any of the functions of the State Government
and the powers vested in the Governor or any
other executive authority in the state.
Effectively, the entire executive authority of
the state shifts to the Union Government (the
President, acting on the advice of the Union
Council of Ministers).
8
Effects on the State Executive
(Cont.)
3.3. Role of the Governor
During President's Rule, the Governor becomes
the de-facto Chief Executive and the primary
administrative authority of the state.
The Governor acts as the representative of the
President (and thus the Union Government).
The Governor administers the state with the help
of the Chief Secretary and/or other advisors
who are usually appointed by the Central
Government.
All major administrative and policy decisions are
taken by the Governor and their team, reporting
directly to the Central Government.
3.4. Impact on State Administration
The implementation of state-specific policies may
be halted or modified to align with the central
government's priorities.
Decision-making authority is centralized,
leading to faster action in some cases (e.g., during
law-and-order crises) but also potentially leading to
bureaucratic delays as local context is
sometimes missed.
The accountability shifts from the elected
representatives (CM and Cabinet) to the non-
9
elected, centrally appointed Governor and
administrators.
Effects on the State Legislature
The impact on the Legislature (Vidhan Sabha/State
Legislative Assembly) is equally significant, as it leads
to the suspension of the state's law-making body.
4.1. Suspension or Dissolution of the Assembly
The President has the power to take one of two actions
regarding the State Legislative Assembly:
1. Suspend the Assembly: The Assembly is kept in a
state of suspended animation, meaning it exists
but cannot conduct business. This is often done to
keep the option open for a new coalition
government to be formed and prove its majority.
2. Dissolve the Assembly: The Assembly is dissolved,
necessitating fresh elections to be held.
4.2. Vesting Legislative Powers in Parliament
The President declares that the powers of the
State Legislature shall be exercisable by or
under the authority of Parliament.
10
This means that the Union Parliament gains the
full authority to make laws for that state on any
subject, including those in the State List.
11
Effects on the State Legislature
(Cont.)
4.3. Delegation of Legislative Power (Article 357)
Since Parliament is often busy, it usually
delegates the power to make laws for the state to
the President or to some other authority specified
by the President.
The President, in turn, can then promulgate
Ordinances for the state even when the
Parliament is not in session.
4.4. Financial Control
The State Budget and other financial bills related
to the state are also passed by the Parliament.
The President is authorised to sanction expenditure
from the Consolidated Fund of the State,
pending its approval by the Parliament.
4.5. Status of Laws Made
Any law made by Parliament or the
President/delegated authority during the
President's Rule continues to be in force even
after the Rule is revoked and the popular
government is restored.
The new State Legislature can, however, repeal or
alter such laws later.
12
13
Impact on the Federal Structure
The President's Rule has profound consequences for the
federal character of the Indian Constitution, which is
based on a division of powers between the Union and
the States.
5.1. Centralization of Power
The most visible effect is the massive
centralization of power. The entire
administrative, legislative, and financial control of
the state is assumed by the Centre.
This action temporarily converts the nature of the
Indian polity from a quasi-federal structure to a
unitary one, overriding the principle of state
autonomy.
5.2. Erosion of State Autonomy
Elected state governments are sidelined, and
policy decisions are made by non-elected
bureaucrats and the Governor, reducing the state's
capacity to chart its own course and respond to
local needs through its own elected
representatives.
This undermines the democratic process at the
state level.
14
15
Impact on the Federal Structure
(Cont.)
5.3. Political Implications
Misuse as a Political Tool: Article 356 has
historically been criticized and often misused by
the ruling party at the Centre to dismiss state
governments run by opposition parties on flimsy or
partisan grounds.
The mere existence of this power is seen by many
as a potential threat to healthy Centre-State
relations, leading to mistrust and weakening the
spirit of cooperative federalism.
5.4. Breakdown of Accountability
The principle of Executive accountability to the
Legislature is temporarily suspended.
The state administration, being run by the
Governor and advisors, is accountable primarily to
the Central Government, not to the people's
representatives in the state. This can lead to a gap
between the administration and the public
16
Judicial Review and Safeguards
Due to the frequent misuse of Article 356, the Judiciary
has intervened to establish significant safeguards, most
notably in the landmark S.R. Bommai v. Union of
India (1994) case.
6.1. The S.R. Bommai Case (1994)
The Supreme Court, in this historic 9-judge bench
decision, laid down strict guidelines for the use of
Article 356, bringing the proclamation under Judicial
Review.
President's Satisfaction is not Absolute: The
Supreme Court held that the President's
satisfaction must be based on 'relevant and
cogent material' and is not beyond judicial
scrutiny. If the Court finds the imposition is mala
fide (in bad faith) or based on extraneous grounds,
it can be struck down.
Floor Test is Mandatory: The Court stated that
the only way to test the majority of the ruling party
in the Assembly is on the floor of the House. The
Governor cannot make the determination based on
his own subjective assessment or external
representations.
17
18
Judicial Review and Safeguards
(Cont.)
6.2. Restrictions on Assembly Dissolution
The most crucial safeguard: The Supreme Court
held that the President cannot dissolve the
Legislative Assembly until the proclamation has
been approved by both Houses of Parliament.
If the Parliament does not approve the
proclamation, the Assembly revives, and the
dismissed Council of Ministers is reinstated. This
acts as a check, preventing a hasty and irreversible
step.
6.3. Recommendations by Commissions
Various commissions have suggested further restraints
on the use of Article 356:
Sarkaria Commission (1983): Recommended
that Article 356 should be used 'very sparingly,
as a measure of last resort,' after exhausting all
other alternatives.
Punchhi Commission (2010): Recommended
amending the articles to allow for 'Localized
Emergency'—Governor's Rule could be imposed in
a specific area of the state rather than taking over
the entire state.
These judicial and extra-constitutional checks aim to
limit the negative impact of the President's Rule and
preserve the federal and democratic character of the
Constitution.
19
20
Criticism and Misuse
Despite the judicial safeguards, Article 356 remains a
controversial provision due to its frequent and
sometimes arbitrary use, which often has detrimental
effects on governance.
7.1. Threat to Federalism
Critics argue that it violates the fundamental
principle of federalism, where states are not mere
administrative units of the Centre but are
autonomous entities within their own sphere.
It is seen as a provision that grants the Centre
excessive power to interfere in the affairs of the
states.
7.2. Undermining Democracy
The power to dismiss an elected government
and dissolve a popularly elected Assembly is seen
as a serious blow to democratic principles.
It substitutes a temporary, nominated
administration for a legitimate, elected
government, thereby weakening the faith of the
public in the democratic process.
7.3. Governance Paralysis
The non-elected administration may lack the
political mandate and local connect to take
major policy decisions or implement essential
reforms.
21
22
Conclusion
The imposition of President's Rule under Article 356,
while intended as a constitutional safety valve to
maintain order and constitutional integrity,
fundamentally and temporarily alters the governance of
a state.
Key Effects: It dismisses the elected executive
(CM and Council of Ministers) and either suspends or
dissolves the elected legislature, vesting the
State's administrative, legislative, and financial powers
in the Union Government via the Governor.
Safeguard: The Supreme Court's verdict in the S.R.
Bommai case has served as a powerful check,
ensuring that this extraordinary power is not used
arbitrarily for political gains but only as a 'last
resort'.
For a vibrant democracy like India, maintaining the
delicate balance between the Union's authority to
protect the Constitution and the States' right to self-
governance remains a critical challenge. The use of
President's Rule, therefore, must always be guided by
the strictest constitutional necessity.
23