0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views11 pages

Vendor Vetting in Healthcare SCM

Uploaded by

brianhilary917
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views11 pages

Vendor Vetting in Healthcare SCM

Uploaded by

brianhilary917
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Module 5: Vendor Role / Vetting / Overview

- Ensure the vendor is safe to your institution and patients.

- How would you ensure safety / efficacy / cost?

- Start from top to bottom


- Supplier may be required to perform an audit / certification / disclose relationships or partnerships.
- Create an entry system for suppliers to facilitate healthcare system analysis and some work on suppliers to prove their
safety.

- You cannot have all 4. You have to choose.


- Points 2-4 are trade-offs.
- Point 2: Financial instability may run the risk of supply chain disruption or cost-cutting at the expense of quality.

- Make trade-offs (high quality at low price is impossible)


- Relationship between hospital and supplier: Adversary or Partner
- Partner: strategic long-term relationship (aligned strategies between two organizations); generally, few partners for
hospitals; high degree of reliability and openness; high volume of business (frequent communications); expect a
synchronous shift in values (flexibility)
- Adversary: Transactional vendor: lots of them; come and go; match and beat price points; no need for frequent
communications; fairly low businesses and flexibility; not much time for investment.

- Purpose: to bring us values (Points 2-4, 6, 8)


- Hospitals can be transparent to their expectations of what can be achieved from supplier partnerships.
- Expect strategic partners to offer us one or more of the following things: cost, high quality, agility, customer service
and competitive advantage
- From a technology management standpoint, we hope to see benefits and risk mitigation (e.g., IT).
- IT has many inherent risks --> even if it reduces risks only (not cost), it is still very helpful to healthcare SCM.

- We may step some suppliers (perceived to be of higher risk or long-term strategic partnership) through the process of
certification.
- Point 1: basic industry standards
- Point 2: bidding contest: RFP, RFQ, RFI
- Point 3: top 5-10% suppliers in terms of certification
- Point 4: step through the pain of certification together to another level.
- Point 5: upgrade deficiency through certification process; anticipate failures along the way; not all have to pass.
- Point 6: ensure certification program changes with businesses, and the suppliers can adapt themselves.
- Point 3: ongoing review of accepted suppliers

- Risks you may see across the vendor sector.


- Many of these risks are present (while not vendors present all these risks)
- Brand damage: Mayo Clinic; hard to measure, but crucial (both hospital and vendor are linked together)
- Point 1-2: impact assessment – if something went wrong, what would be the impact of vendor failure on our
organization? (Background checks)
- Point 3: especially if you have not dealt with the vendor before; ask for examples of work to prove the vendor’s
capability.

- Emerging in healthcare industry (IT & Software development); already common in financial services
- Create a cross-functional group across the healthcare organization that is responsible for vetting, approving and
monitoring on an ongoing basis.
- Not all are necessary; but high-profile strategic relationships may involve some levels.
- Holistic risk appetite profile for supplier on an internal, cross-functional basis.
- Start with registration.
- Look at the risk --> due diligence --> RFP --> contracting for goods or service --> once contracting is in place, ongoing
monitoring of vendor performance (not restricted to contract T&C; include security breaches checking from an IT
perspective) --> Audit & inspection (e.g., IT infrastructure) --> Resolve issues through issue management (continue till
the contract end)
- If termination, need to close doors (e.g., if sharing of patient data has been involved, request return / disable
electronic access)
- Third-party risk management process: manage a supplier through contract lifecycle (holistic)
- Tier 1: highest risk (e.g., IT infrastructure concerns) --> warrant onsite audits; Strategically high risk, but high reward
vendors.
- Organization to align due diligence with the tier classification a vendor falls under.

- A simple example
- Determine whether Tier 1 or 2 --> Determine if due diligence is required --> Multi-team review (survey your vendor
population and decide what you are going to from there; sometimes, you may need more information from the
answer with more due diligence)
- Context: security team is involved in the selection process; perform assessments to determine security of data sharing
- How security staff from the organization steps into SCM and advises whether a supplier should be selected.

- Vendors deserve to be guided through the healthcare SCM


- Point 1: Be transparent about what the organization expects and what the vendor is responsible for.
- Point 2: create barriers to mitigate risks and deal with them proactively.
- Point 3: encourage learning and sharing of things happening in other organizations.

- Point 1: few hospitals have a complete list of vendors; very risky for the organization.
- Point 2: IT infrastructure and security, ISO standards; ensure the vendors buy in and demonstrate compliance with
your internal requirements.
- Point 3-4: ensure the right risk classification (Tier 1-3).
- Point 5: design on the frequency and what you are going to (e.g., onsite inspection); always document them.
- A lot of paperwork, but the key is to mitigate the risk within your organization; it is worthwhile.

You might also like