Virtualization in Cloud Computing Explained
Virtualization in Cloud Computing Explained
Module 2
Example Scenarios
1
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Benefits of Virtualization
Virtualization Layer
The virtualization layer is a software layer that abstracts physical hardware resources (CPU,
memory, storage, network, etc.) and presents them as virtual resources to applications and
operating systems. It acts as a bridge between the physical hardware and virtual instances,
ensuring proper allocation, isolation, and management of resources.
2
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
3
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
1. Instruction Emulation:
o The source ISA (e.g., MIPS) is emulated on the target ISA (e.g., x86) through
a software layer.
o The software layer interprets or translates the source instructions into target
machine instructions.
4
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
1. Code Interpretation:
o Process: An interpreter program translates source instructions into host
(native) instructions one-by-one during execution.
o Characteristics:
Simple to implement.
High overhead due to the need to process each instruction individually.
o Performance: Slow, as each source instruction may require tens or even
hundreds of native instructions to execute.
2. Dynamic Binary Translation:
o Process:
Instead of interpreting instructions one-by-one, this method translates
blocks of source instructions (basic blocks, traces, or superblocks)
into target instructions.
The translated blocks are cached, so subsequent executions do not need
re-translation.
o Characteristics:
Faster than interpretation due to caching and reuse of translated
instructions.
Optimization opportunities arise from analyzing multiple instructions
in a block.
o Performance: Significantly better than interpretation but requires more
complex implementation.
3. Binary Translation and Optimization:
o Purpose: Enhance performance and reduce the overhead of translation.
o Methods:
Static Binary Translation: Translates the entire binary code before
execution, which avoids runtime translation but can miss opportunities
for runtime optimizations.
Dynamic Binary Translation: Translates instructions at runtime,
enabling better adaptability to runtime conditions.
Dynamic Optimizations: Includes reordering, inlining, and loop
unrolling to improve the efficiency of translated code.
ISA-level virtualization via instruction set emulation opens immense possibilities for
running diverse workloads across platforms, supporting legacy systems, and enabling
hardware independence. The shift from simple interpretation to more advanced
techniques like dynamic binary translation and optimizations has significantly
improved its performance and applicability, making it a key enabler for cross-platform
software execution.
5
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
1. Performance Overhead:
o Emulating an ISA on another is inherently slower due to instruction-by-
instruction interpretation or translation.
o Dynamic binary translation improves performance but still adds runtime
overhead.
2. Complexity:
o Implementing dynamic binary translation and optimizations requires advanced
techniques and significant development effort.
3. Scalability:
o Supporting highly diverse ISAs can become challenging, especially when
optimizing performance for multiple architectures.
1. High Performance:
o Since the hypervisor runs directly on hardware, it minimizes overhead and
provides near-native performance for VMs.
2. Scalability:
o Easily supports multiple VMs, enabling efficient use of physical server
resources.
3. Fault Isolation:
o Problems in one VM (e.g., OS crashes or software bugs) do not impact other
VMs or the host system.
4. Versatility:
o Supports running different operating systems or environments on the same
physical hardware.
Operating System (OS) level virtualization is a type of virtualization that operates at the OS
kernel layer, creating isolated environments called containers or virtual environments within
a single instance of an operating system. This approach allows multiple isolated user spaces to
run on the same physical hardware while sharing the same operating system kernel.
7
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
1. Single OS Limitation:Since all containers share the same kernel, they must use the
same operating system. For example, you cannot run a Windows container on a Linux
host.
2. Weaker Isolation:Compared to hardware-level virtualization, OS-level virtualization
provides less isolation. If the kernel is compromised, all containers are at risk.
3. Compatibility Issues:Applications that require specific kernel modules or features not
supported by the shared kernel may face compatibility challenges.
Applications are written to use standard library calls for their functionality, such as file
access, networking, or graphics.
Library-level virtualization intercepts these calls (using API hooks) and replaces the
original functionality with emulated or redirected behavior.
8
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
1. Cross-Platform Compatibility:
9
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
o Applications written for an abstract VM (e.g., JVM, CLR) can run on any
system with the corresponding VM implementation.
2. Improved Security:
o Applications are isolated from the host OS and other applications, reducing the
risk of system compromise or interference.
3. Simplified Deployment:
o Applications can be distributed as self-contained packages, eliminating the need
for complex installation procedures or OS-level dependencies.
4. Resource Efficiency:
o Compared to hardware- or OS-level virtualization, application-level
virtualization has lower overhead as it focuses only on individual processes.
5. Portability:
o Virtualized applications can be easily moved between systems or platforms.
1. Performance Overhead:
o Running applications in a virtualized environment may introduce some latency
compared to native execution.
2. Limited Scope:
o Unlike OS- or hardware-level virtualization, application-level virtualization
cannot provide a full OS environment or support multiple users.
3. Compatibility Challenges:
o Not all applications can be easily virtualized, especially those with tight
integration with the underlying OS or hardware.
In the above table, the column headings correspond to four technical merits. “Higher
Performance” and “Application Flexibility” are self-explanatory. “Implementation
Complexity” implies the cost to implement that particular virtualization level. “Application
Isolation” refers to the effort required to isolate resources committed to different VMs.
The number of X’s in the table cells reflects the advantage points of each implementation level.
Five X’s implies the best case and one X implies the worst case. Overall, hardware and OS
support will yield the highest performance. However, the hardware and application levels are
10
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
also the most expensive to implement. User isolation is the most difficult to achieve. ISA
implementation offers the best application flexibility.
Efficiency is crucial for VMMs, as slow emulators or interpreters are unsuitable for real
machines. To ensure performance, most virtual processor instructions should execute directly
on physical hardware without VMM intervention.
The VMM manages resources by allocating them to programs, restricting unauthorized access,
and regaining control when needed. However, implementing VMMs can be challenging on
certain processor architectures (e.g., x86), where privileged instructions cannot always be
trapped. Processors not designed for virtualization may require hardware modifications to meet
VMM requirements, a method known as hardware-assisted virtualization.
Key Observations:
VMware Workstation supports a wide range of guest operating systems and uses full
virtualization.
VMware ESX Server eliminates a host OS, running directly on hardware with para-
virtualization.
Xen supports diverse host OSs and uses a hypervisor-based architecture.
11
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
KVM runs exclusively on Linux hosts and supports para-virtualization for multiple
architectures.
To address these challenges and enhance cloud computing efficiency, significant research and
development are needed.
VEs share the same OS kernel but appear as independent servers to users, each with its own
processes, file system, user accounts, network settings, and more. This approach, known as
single-OS image virtualization, is an efficient alternative to hardware-level virtualization.
Figure 3.3 illustrates operating systems virtualization from the point of view of a machine
stack.
12
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
In cloud computing, these features address the slow initialization of hardware-level VMs and
their inability to account for the current application state.
The primary disadvantage of OS-level virtualization is that all VMs on a single container must
belong to the same operating system family. For example, a Linux-based container cannot run
a Windows OS. This limitation challenges its usability in cloud computing, where users may
prefer different operating systems.
13
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
[Link].1 Duplicating resources for each VM: This incur high resource costs and overhead.
[Link].2 Sharing most resources with the host and creating private copies on
demand: This is more efficient and commonly used.
Due to its limitations and overhead in some scenarios, OS-level virtualization is often
considered a secondary choice compared to hardware-assisted virtualization.
Most Linux platforms are not tied to a specific kernel, enabling a host to run multiple
VMs simultaneously on the same hardware.
Linux-based tools, such as Linux vServer and OpenVZ, support running applications
from other platforms through virtualization.
On Windows, FVM is a specific tool developed for OS-level virtualization on the
Windows NT platform.
Key Features:
[Link].1 Isolation:
[Link].1.1Each VPS has its own files, user accounts, process tree, virtual network,
virtual devices, and interprocess communication (IPC) mechanisms.
[Link].2 Resource Management:
[Link].2.1 Disk Allocation: Two levels:
[Link].2.1.1 First level: The OpenVZ server administrator assigns disk space
limits to each VM.
[Link].2.1.2 Second level: VM administrators manage disk quotas for
users and groups.
14
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Advantages:
Challenges:
1. WABI:
o Middleware that translates Windows system calls into Solaris system calls,
allowing Windows applications to run on Solaris systems.
15
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
2. Lxrun:
16
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
o A system call emulator enabling Linux applications designed for x86 hosts to
run on UNIX systems.
3. WINE:
o Provides library support to virtualize x86 processors, enabling Windows
applications to run on UNIX-based systems.
4. Visual MainWin:
o A compiler support system that allows developers to use Visual Studio to
create Windows applications capable of running on some UNIX hosts.
5. vCUDA:
o A virtualization solution for CUDA, enabling applications requiring GPU
acceleration to utilize GPU resources remotely. (Discussed in detail in Example
3.2.)
Key Benefits:
Challenges:
1. Purpose:
o Virtualizes the CUDA library for guest OSes, enabling CUDA applications to
execute GPU-based tasks indirectly through the host OS.
2. Architecture:
o Follows a client-server model with three main components:
vCUDA Library:
Resides in the guest OS as a substitute for the standard CUDA
library.
Intercepts and redirects API calls to the host OS.
Manages virtual GPUs (vGPUs).
Virtual GPU (vGPU):
Abstracts GPU hardware, provides a uniform interface, and
manages device memory allocation.
Tracks and stores CUDA API flow.
vCUDA Stub:
Resides in the host OS.
Receives and interprets requests from the guest OS.
17
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Creates execution contexts for CUDA API calls and manages the
physical GPU resources.
3. Functionality of vGPU:
o Abstracts the GPU structure, giving applications a consistent view of hardware.
o Handles memory allocation by mapping virtual addresses in the guest OS to real
device memory in the host OS.
o Stores the flow of CUDA API calls for proper execution.
4. Workflow:
o CUDA applications on the guest OS send API calls to the vCUDA library.
o The vCUDA library redirects these calls to the vCUDA stub on the host OS.
o The vCUDA stub processes the requests, executes them on the physical GPU,
and returns results to the guest OS.
Benefits of vCUDA:
Challenges:
Relies heavily on the client-server architecture and the efficiency of API call
redirection.
Performance may depend on the complexity of GPU tasks and overhead of
virtualization.
There are three typical classes of VM architectures, differentiated by the placement of the
virtualization layer in the system stack. Virtualization transforms a machine’s architecture by
inserting a virtualization layer between the hardware and the operating system. This layer
converts real hardware into virtual hardware, enabling different operating systems (e.g., Linux
and Windows) to run simultaneously on the same physical machine.
18
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Classes of VM Architectures:
Key Points:
The virtualization layer is crucial for translating real hardware into virtual hardware.
These architectures enable flexibility in running multiple operating systems on the same
machine.
Hypervisors (or VMMs) and other approaches vary in performance, complexity, and
implementation.
The hypervisor (or Virtual Machine Monitor, VMM) enables hardware-level virtualization by
acting as an intermediate layer between physical hardware (e.g., CPU, memory, disk, network
interfaces) and the operating systems (OS). It facilitates the creation of virtual resources that
guest OSes and applications can utilize.
1. Micro-Kernel Hypervisor:
o Only includes essential and unchanging functionalities, such as physical
memory management and processor scheduling.
o Device drivers and other changeable components are kept outside the
hypervisor.
o Examples: Microsoft Hyper-V.
o Advantages: Smaller code size, reduced complexity, and easier maintainability.
2. Monolithic Hypervisor:
o Integrates all functionalities, including device drivers, within the hypervisor
itself.
o Examples: VMware ESX for server virtualization.
o Advantages: Comprehensive functionality but with a larger codebase and
potential complexity.
19
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Supports virtualized access to physical hardware through hypercalls for guest OSes
and applications.
Converts physical devices into virtual resources for use by virtual machines (VMs).
Plays a critical role in resource management and scheduling for multiple VMs.
These architectures allow efficient use of physical hardware while enabling multiple OSes to
run simultaneously.
A key feature of Xen is Domain 0 (Dom0), a privileged guest OS that manages hardware
access and resource allocation for other guest domains (Domain U). Since Dom0 controls the
entire system, its security is critical. If compromised, an attacker can control all virtual
machines.
Xen allows users to manage VMs flexibly creating, copying, migrating, and rolling back
instances. However, this flexibility also introduces security risks, as VMs can revert to previous
states, potentially reintroducing vulnerabilities. Unlike traditional machines with a linear
execution timeline, Xen VMs form a tree-like execution state, enabling multiple instances
and rollbacks, which benefits system management but also creates security challenges.
Note: A key feature of Xen is Domain 0 (Dom0), a privileged virtual machine responsible for
managing hardware, I/O operations, and other guest VMs (Domain U). Dom0 is the first OS
to load and has direct hardware access, allowing it to allocate resources and manage devices
for unprivileged guest domains.
Application
Application
Application
Application
Application
Application
Application
Application
Application
XEN (Hypervisor)
Hardware devices
FIGURE 3.5
The Xen architecture’s special domain 0 for control and I/O, and several guest domains for user applications.
Full Virtualization
20
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Host-Based Virtualization
While host-based virtualization offers flexibility, it is generally less efficient than full
virtualization with a VMM.
Challenges of Para-Virtualization
1. Compatibility & Portability Issues: Since para-virtualization modifies the guest OS,
supporting unmodified OSes becomes difficult.
21
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Para-Virtualization Architecture
Guest OS Modification: The OS kernel is modified, but user applications may also
need changes.
Hypercalls: Privileged instructions that would normally run at Ring 0 are replaced
with hypercalls to the hypervisor.
Intelligent Compiler: A specialized compiler assists in identifying and replacing
nonvirtualizable instructions with hypercalls, optimizing performance.
Improved Efficiency: Compared to full virtualization, para-virtualization
significantly reduces overhead, making VM execution closer to native
performance.
Limitation: Since the guest OS is modified, it cannot run directly on physical
hardware without a hypervisor.
Due to the inefficiency of binary translation, many virtualization solutions, including Xen,
KVM, and VMware ESX, use para-virtualization.
22
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
VMware pioneered the virtualization market, providing solutions for desktops, servers, and
data centers. VMware ESX is a bare-metal hypervisor designed for x86 symmetric
multiprocessing (SMP) servers, enabling efficient virtualization by directly managing
hardware resources.
Para-Virtualization in ESX
The VMkernel interacts directly with the hardware, bypassing the need for a host OS.
Para-virtualized drivers (e.g., VMXNET for networking, PVSCSI for disk I/O) improve
performance.
Provides better efficiency than full virtualization while supporting unmodified guest
OSes via hardware-assisted virtualization (Intel VT, AMD-V).
23
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
1. VMware Workstation
o A host-based virtualization software suite for x86 and x86-64 systems.
o Runs multiple VMs simultaneously on a host OS.
2. Xen Hypervisor
o Works on IA-32, x86-64, Itanium, and PowerPC 970 architectures.
o Modifies Linux to function as a hypervisor, controlling guest OSes.
3. KVM (Kernel-Based Virtual Machine)
o Integrated into the Linux kernel as a virtualization infrastructure.
o Supports hardware-assisted virtualization (Intel VT-x, AMD V) and
paravirtualization via the VirtIO framework.
o VirtIO components include:
Paravirtual Ethernet Card (for networking).
Disk I/O Controller (optimized storage access).
Balloon Device (dynamically adjusts VM memory allocation).
24
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Example 3.4: Hardware Support for Virtualization in the Intel x86 Processor
Figure 3.10 provides an overview of Intel’s full virtualization techniques. For processor
virtualization, Intel offers the VT-x or VT-i technique. VT-x adds a privileged mode (VMX
Root Mode) and some instructions to processors. This enhancement traps all sensitive
instructions in the VMM automatically. For memory virtualization, Intel offers the EPT, which
translates the virtual address to the machine’s physical addresses to improve performance. For
I/O virtualization, Intel implements VT-d and VT-c to support this.
1. Privileged Instructions
o Execute only in privileged mode.
o If executed in user mode, they trigger a trap.
2. Control-Sensitive Instructions
o Modify system resources (e.g., changing memory configuration).
3. Behavior-Sensitive Instructions
25
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
RISC CPUs (e.g., PowerPC, SPARC) are naturally virtualizable since all sensitive
instructions are privileged.
x86 CPUs were not originally designed for virtualization, as some sensitive instructions
(e.g., SGDT, SMSW) are not privileged.
o These instructions bypass the VMM, making virtualization difficult without
software-based techniques like binary translation.
26
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Performance Considerations
High efficiency expected, but switching between hypervisor and guest OS causes
overhead.
Hybrid Approach (used by VMware):
o Offloads some tasks to hardware while keeping others in software.
Combining Para-Virtualization with Hardware-Assisted Virtualization further boosts
performance.
Memory Management Unit (MMU) and Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) help
optimize performance.
Guest OS controls virtual-to-physical mapping but cannot directly access machine
memory.
VMM (Hypervisor) handles actual memory allocation to prevent conflicts.
27
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
4. VMware's Approach
Software-based shadow page tables were inefficient and caused high performance
overhead.
Frequent memory lookups and context switches slowed down virtualized environments.
Hardware-assisted memory virtualization that eliminates the need for shadow page
tables.
Works with Virtual Processor ID (VPID) to optimize Translation Lookaside Buffer
(TLB) usage.
Reduces memory lookup time and improves performance significantly.
28
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Intel increased the size of EPT TLB to store more translations and reduce memory
accesses.
This dramatically improves memory access speed and virtualization efficiency.
29
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Intel VT-d technology supports I/O DMA remapping and device interrupt remapping.
Helps unmodified, specialized, or virtualization-aware guest OSes run efficiently.
30
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Summary
I/O virtualization continues to evolve, with hardware-assisted methods like VT-d and SV-
IO improving efficiency and reducing overhead.
31
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Disadvantages
32
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
As multi-core processors become more prevalent, virtualizing them presents unique challenges
compared to single-core processors. While multi-core CPUs offer higher performance by
integrating multiple cores on a single chip, virtualization introduces complexities in task
scheduling, parallel execution, and resource management.
3. Dynamic Heterogeneity
33
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
The integration of different types of cores (fat CPU cores & thin GPU cores) on the
same chip makes resource management more complex.
As transistor reliability decreases and complexity increases, system designers must
adapt scheduling techniques dynamically.
34
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
o Virtual clusters must be quickly set up, shut down, and switched to optimize
resource use.
o Green computing techniques aim to save energy, but live VM migration can
cause performance overhead.
o Load balancing strategies help distribute workloads efficiently across VMs.
2. High-Performance Virtual Storage
o VM images (software templates) must be stored efficiently to reduce space and
improve deployment speed.
o Copy-on-Write (COW) technology allows creating new VMs quickly by
modifying existing templates instead of duplicating entire disk images.
o Automating VM configurations can save time when managing large numbers of
VMs.
Conclusion:
Virtual clusters provide flexibility, efficient resource usage, and better fault tolerance.
However, they require careful management for fast deployment, effective load balancing, and
optimized storage. Strategies like automated configuration and optimized migration help
improve performance while reducing overhead.
36
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
In a mixed-node cluster, virtual machines (VMs) typically run on physical hosts, but if a host
fails, its VM role can be taken over by another VM on a different host. This enables flexible
failover compared to traditional physical-to-physical failover. However, if a host fails, its VMs
also fail, which can be mitigated through live VM migration.
1. Guest-Based Manager: The cluster manager runs inside the guest OS (e.g., OpenMosix,
Sun’s Oasis).
2. Host-Based Manager: The cluster manager runs on the host OS, supervising VMs (e.g.,
VMware HA).
3. Independent Manager: Both guest and host have separate cluster managers, increasing
complexity.
4. Integrated Cluster Management: A unified manager controls both virtual and physical
resources.
1. Start Migration: Identify the VM and destination host, often triggered by load balancing
or server consolidation strategies.
2. Memory Transfer: The VM’s memory is copied to the destination host in multiple
rounds, ensuring minimal disruption.
3. Suspend and Final Copy: The VM pauses briefly to transfer the last memory portion,
CPU, and network states.
4. Commit and Activate: The destination host loads the VM state and resumes execution.
5. Redirect Network & Cleanup: The network redirects to the new VM, and the old VM
is removed.
Performance Effects:
37
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
The first memory copy takes 63 seconds, reducing network speed from 870 MB/s to
765 MB/s.
Additional memory copy rounds further reduce speed to 694 MB/s in 9.8 seconds.
The total downtime is only 165 milliseconds, ensuring minimal service disruption.
Live VM migration enhances cloud computing by enabling seamless workload balancing and
minimizing downtime during host failures. Platforms like VMware and Xen support these
migrations, allowing multiple VMs to run efficiently on a shared physical infrastructure.
Active VM on Host A
Stage 1: Reservation
Stage 4: Commitment
38
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Shared clusters reduce costs and improve resource utilization. When migrating a system to a
new physical node, key factors include memory migration, file system migration, and
network migration.
1. Memory Migration
3. Network Migration
Precopy Approach:
o Transfers all memory pages first, then iteratively copies only modified pages.
o Reduces downtime but increases total migration time.
Checkpoint/Recovery & Trace/Replay (CR/TR-Motion):
o Transfers execution logs instead of dirty pages, minimizing migration time.
o Limited by differences in source and target system performance.
Postcopy Approach:
o Transfers memory pages once but has higher downtime due to fetch delays.
Memory Compression:
o Uses spare CPU resources to compress memory pages before transfer, reducing
data size.
39
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Key Takeaways
Trade-offs in Migration
The compression algorithm must be fast and effective for different types of memory
data.
Using a single compression method for all memory pages is not efficient because
different memory types require different strategies.
Conclusion
Live migration in Xen, enhanced by RDMA, allows seamless VM transfer with minimal impact
on performance. Techniques like precopying, dirty bitmaps, and compression improve
efficiency while ensuring smooth operation.
40
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
41
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Note:
Virtual clusters help efficiently manage and allocate resources.
COD and VIOLIN show that dynamic adaptation can significantly improve resource
utilization.
Live migration allows VMs to be moved with minimal downtime.
These techniques enable scalable, flexible, and cost-effective cloud computing
solutions.
42
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Chatty workloads (e.g., web video services) that have fluctuating demand.
Noninteractive workloads (e.g., high-performance computing) that require consistent
resource allocation.
To meet peak demand, resources are often statically allocated, leading to underutilized servers
and wasted costs in hardware, space, and power. Server consolidation—particularly
virtualization-based consolidation—optimizes resource management by reducing physical
servers and improving hardware utilization.
43
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
By leveraging virtualization and multicore processing (CMP), data centers can enhance
efficiency, but optimization in memory access, VM reassignment, and power management
remains a challenge.
Parallax is a scalable virtual storage system designed for cluster-based environments. It enables
efficient storage management by using a set of per-host storage appliances that share access to
a common block device.
Efficient Block Virtualization: Uses Xen’s block tap driver and tapdisk library for
handling block storage requests across VMs.
Storage Appliance VM: Acts as an intermediary between client VMs and physical
hardware, facilitating live upgrades of block device drivers.
Parallax enhances flexibility, scalability, and ease of storage management in virtualized data
centers by integrating advanced block storage virtualization techniques.
To function as cloud providers, data centers must be virtualized using Virtual Infrastructure
(VI) managers and Cloud OSes. Table 3.6 outlines four such platforms:
1. Nimbus (Open-source)
2. Eucalyptus (Open-source)
3. OpenNebula (Open-source)
4. vSphere 4 (Proprietary, VMware)
VM Creation & Management: All platforms support virtual machines and virtual
clusters for elastic cloud resources.
Virtual Networking: Nimbus, Eucalyptus, and OpenNebula offer virtual network
support, enabling flexible communication between VMs.
Dynamic Resource Provisioning: OpenNebula stands out by allowing advance
reservations of cloud resources.
Hypervisor Support:
45
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
o Nimbus, Eucalyptus, and OpenNebula use Xen & KVM for virtualization.
o vSphere 4 utilizes VMware ESX & ESXi hypervisors.
Virtual Storage & Data Protection: Only vSphere 4 supports virtual storage along with
networking and data protection.
Eucalyptus is an open-source software system designed for private cloud infrastructure and
Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS). It enables virtual networking and VM management, but does
not support virtual storage.
46
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Eucalyptus provides a flexible and scalable solution for private cloud networking but lacks
some security and general-purpose cloud features.
vSphere 4, released by VMware in April 2009, is a virtualization platform designed for private
cloud management. It extends earlier VMware products like Workstation, ESX, and Virtual
Infrastructure. The system interacts with applications through vCenter and provides
infrastructure and application services.
Users must understand vCenter interfaces to manage applications effectively. More details are
available on the vSphere 4 website.
47
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) help identify unauthorized access. IDS can be:
48
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
A VM-based IDS leverages virtualization to isolate VMs, preventing compromised VMs from
affecting others. The Virtual Machine Monitor (VMM) can audit access requests, combining
the strengths of HIDS and NIDS. There are two methods for implementation:
Garfinkel and Rosenblum proposed a VMM-based IDS that monitors guest VMs using a policy
framework and trace-based security enforcement. However, logs used for analysis can be
compromised if the operating system is attacked.
Besides IDS, honeypots and honeynets are used to detect attacks by tricking attackers into
interacting with fake systems. Honeypots can be physical or virtual, and in virtual honeypots,
the host OS and VMM must be protected to prevent attacks from guest VMs.
EMC and VMware collaborated to develop security middleware for trust management in
distributed systems and private clouds. The concept of trusted zones was introduced to enhance
security in virtual clusters, where multiple applications and OS instances for different tenants
operate in separate virtual environments.
49
Dept of AIML SJBIT
BIS613D Cloud Computing and Security Module 2
The trusted zones ensure secure isolation of VMs while allowing controlled interactions among
tenants, providers, and global communities. This approach strengthens security in private cloud
environments.
50
Dept of AIML SJBIT