Investment Analysis for OSOPANDA Projects
Investment Analysis for OSOPANDA Projects
FINANCING EXERCISES
AND INVESTMENT
1. The company OSOPANDA, S.L. is considering making an investment, for which it has
two offers. The first offer (project A) involves an outlay of €16,653 and
guarantees cash flows of €6,500 and €13,000 in the first and second year respectively.
the investment, respectively. The second offer (project B) involves an outlay
much greater, at €71,428, but it will only last for one year, at the end of which you will obtain
a cash flow of €76,428.
With this data, you are asked to answer the following questions in a justified manner:
a) Indicate which offer the company will choose if it follows the period criterion.
recovery or payback.
b) Study the level of interest of each of the offers based on the cost of
capital opportunity and the Fisher Rate.
VAN
Project b
Project to
5% 7% 10% i
A company wants to launch a product to the market and needs to make an investment.
for a new plant. The project will take 3 years and the following information is
available
The investment amounts to €250,000
A production level of 10,000 units is expected along with an increase in the
production of 10% over the previous year in each of the next two years
The cost of raw materials is €15 per unit.
Additional workers need to be hired, which represents an annual cost of
30,000€.
Likewise, a maintenance contract for the machinery will be signed with a cost
from 3,000€/year, and a new warehouse will be rented for a cost of 10,000€/year
The company estimates that it will be able to sell the machinery at the end of the three years, for
15,000€.
The cost of capital is 6%. Using this data, respond:
a) What is the minimum price at which the products must be sold for the
Is the project profitable?
a)-250000+p*10000-15*10000-43000+p*11000-15*11000-43000+p*12100-15*12100-43000+15000=0
1.06 1.06 squared 1.06 raised to the power of 3
P=27 €
b) The minimum price will be higher as it will be affected by a higher interest rate. The NPV
It will fall. If the price given in section a) is the one applied, the IRR will remain the same (6%), and it will be higher.
that 6% if the new price is applied.
c) In this case, the selling price will also be higher to cover fixed costs when there is a
lower production. The NPV increases and the IRR falls.
RECOVERY PERIOD:
Project A: It recovers in a year, as after the disbursement of 18,658 monetary units, at the end
From the first year, he perceives 23,614 monetary units, so he will recover the 18,658 disbursed from the current moment.
The recovery period is 1 year.
Project B: It is recovered at the end of year 2, as the disbursement of 10,000 units is not recovered with the
5,000 monetary units of the net cash flow of year 1, with 5,000 monetary units pending to be received along with
another 8,000 units at the end of year 2 (13,000 units).
The payback period is two years. Project A is preferred over B according to this criterion, because the
The recovery period of A is shorter than that of B.
TIR
From the quadratic equation, a single positive real root is obtained, which is the IRR of project A, rA =
39.96478213%. Project A will be profitable as long as the cost of capital, k, is less than that.
39.96478213%
From this quadratic equation, a unique positive real root is obtained, which is the IRR of project B.
rB= 40’84230634%. The project A will be profitable as long as the cost of capital, k, is less than that.
40’84230634%
According to the IRR criterion, project B would be chosen for having a higher rate of return, rB > rA.
VAN:
As the discount rate is unknown to calculate the NPV of the two projects, it will be analyzed
for what values of k the projects are indifferent according to the NPV, as that way it will be known for
What values of k make project A preferable to B and vice versa? The discount rate, k (cost of capital)
It will be obtained by equating the NPV formulas of the two projects.
From this quadratic equation, two positive real roots are obtained. The solution to this equation,
They are a Fisher rate, rf.
The obtained solutions are two:
rf1= 5,1787765% y rf2= 9 ,8131385%.
If 0≤k < rf1, VANB> VANA, project B will be chosen. The NPV for k=0% is 8,456 monetary units, while
that the NPV (0) = 8,500 monetary units.
If rf1 < k < rf2, VANA > VANB, project A will be chosen.
X X €300.000 €500.000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
5. The financial director of the company Lavamax SA, dedicated to distribution and sales
The home appliances department receives the following proposal from a washing machine manufacturer:
Our usual payment formula is to receive the amount for the goods that
os vendemos, a 90 días desde su entrega. Pero en atención a que vuestro pedido
It is very interesting (€500,000), we can give you a 3% discount on it.
invoice, if we collect the payment in cash (discount for prompt payment)
Lavamax only has in cash the money necessary for small expenses.
but she has an open line of credit with her bank, for which the entity
The financial institution is charging a 0.2% annual fee (whether or not the money is used). The type of
the interest that the bank charges on the amounts withdrawn is 4.2% per year
(this cost includes the aforementioned line of credit).
What decision should the financial director make?
RESULT. The saving by paying in cash and asking for credit: 15,000 - 4,850 = 10,150 €
The financial director will opt to pay in cash by obtaining the money from the credit account.
1. What is the Net Present Value of the Lorca-Madrid Airport line, for a
forecast of the cost of money at 10%?
2. Expects to recover the invested money within a maximum period of 3 years; according to the
projections, will it achieve it? (quantify the answer).
Note: consider that the year has 360 days.
Solution
HYPOTHESIS / PERIOD Initial year 1 year 2 year 3 year 4
Inversion 1,000,000
buses 2
maximum passengers/bus 60
day trips / totals 2 1440 1440 1440 1440
occupation 50% 60% 70% 80%
Nº Viajeros 43,200 51.840 60.480 69.120
Traveler price/INCOME 25 1.080.000 1.296.000 1.512.000 1.728.000
COSTES/trayecto /total año 500 720,000 720,000 720,000 720,000
NET CASH FLOW 360,000 576,000 792.000 1.008.000
CASH FLOW DISCOUNTED AT 10% -1,000,000 327.273 476.033 595.041 688.478
VAN 1.086.825
PAY BACK -64.000 66000 -0.96969697 YES, IT RECOVERS IN 2 YEARS AND 1 MONTH
7. In an investment project that is intended to be carried out in four years for the purchase
For machinery, the following information is available:
Initial investment of €125,000.
The net income generated by the production of machinery during those
four years, are respectively €45,000, €55,000, €40,000, and €35,000.
A contract is established for the maintenance of the machinery, for an amount of
3,000€/year. Additionally, in the second year the machinery suffers a breakdown.
which is not provided for in the maintenance contract and the repair has a
additional cost of €2,000.
The machinery at the end of its 4-year useful life is sold for scrap for
10.000€.
The annual discount rate is 10%.
a) Calculate the NPV of the project
b) Reason (it is not necessary to calculate the value) how the following facts would affect:
1. If a discount rate equal to its Internal Rate of Return were considered
The IRR would be greater than, less than, or equal to 10%?
2. If the cash flows were the same but delayed by one year each, similarly
What would happen to the NPV and the IRR if the useful life of the machinery changes?
3. If the project were required to have a payback of less than 3 years, would it be met?
4. If there were a residual value at the conclusion of the project, how does it affect you?
VAN?
a) VAN = -125 + (45-3)/(1+0.1) + (55-3-2)/(1+0.1)² + (40-3)/(1+0.1)³ + (35-3+10)/(1+0.1)⁴ =
10989 €
b.1) If the discount rate is equal to the IRR, the NPV is 0. Since the NPV is positive, the IRR
It must be greater than 10% (it is 14.06%).
b.2) There would be a decrease in NPV and IRR, since the present value of the flows
futures would be reduced by having to wait more years. Here the reduction is quantifiable: the
The NPV would become negative (-1373.22 €) and the IRR would be below 10% (9.64%)
b.3) That's right, the payback of the project is 2 years and 7.5 months.
Having a positive cash flow in the last year increases the NPV.
Knowing that the IRR is the rate (I=K) that makes the NPV equal to 0. We solve for it.
k = 13%
Graphically:
a) Project A
b) The Project B
c) The Project A
VAN
Project b
Project to
i
5% TIRB