Guarantee Checks in Business Law Risks
Guarantee Checks in Business Law Risks
Semester 1
MODULE : DROIT PENAL DES AFFAIRES
Framed by:
Made by:
Ghanmi Omar
Eloirdi Halima
INTRODUCTION
business...................................................10
CONCLUSION………………………………………………...16
BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………….17
1
INTRODUCTION
2
change and the promissory note. The new commercial code of 1996 eventually incorporated
the latest being the legislation on checks which was contained in the dahir of 1939 in its
articles 239 to 328 with very significant modifications, especially in
criminal law.
The offenses related to checks are more numerous; we can mention: the offenses
of a bounced check, acceptance or endorsement of a forged check or
counterfeit...
What concerns us is the offense related to the check as a guarantee. Thus, the
The concept of a guarantee check does not exist in Moroccan law.
Legally, the guarantee check is obviously illegal. The law
severely sanction those who issue or accept a guarantee check.
Article 316 of the commercial code and Article 544 of the penal code are clear.
As well as on a practical level, whether they are traders or not The traders
they use it as a guarantee tool, even if the latter should only be used as
what means of payment. This is how the guarantee check has become a
phenomenon that threatens the monetary policy of the State due to the creation of a
fake currency and it is of no use for true wealth.
The issuer is supposed to have the provision in their bank account. Yet this
practice is very common among several establishments (rental agencies of
cars, private clinics, etc.) which also require the check to be signed, made out to
bearer and undated, which exposes the issuer to great risks.
It was previously mentioned that the security deposit check is considered as a
Infraction in Morocco, it is the same for Egypt. The Egyptian commercial code
Since 1999, the acceptance of guarantee checks is not independently provided for.
but it associates acceptance with knowledge and perfect understanding and
complete absence of provision.
Unlike French law, issuing or accepting a check is not at all
an offense, nor even a misdemeanor. This is the case in Anglo-Saxon law.
French law considers the guarantee cheque as a deposit cheque on the
price. For example, in a deed or sales contract, if one of the parties gives a
The cheque as a guarantee, the sale is considered definitively concluded. Thus
that the guarantee check can also be considered as a deposit,
that is to say an amount paid allowing the buyer to reserve the business for a
certain time before making a final decision.
Therefore, the issue of our subject will revolve around the guarantee check, its
sanctions and their risks. So the pertinent question that arises is as follows:
3
What are the sanctions imposed by the Moroccan legislator, and what are they
risks arising from its practice?
To better understand the idea, we will first address the legal regime of
guarantee check (CHAPTER 1), and then the guarantee check between the risks and
the difficulty of proof (CHAPTER 2).
4
CHAPTER 1: the legal regime of the guarantee check
The check is exclusively a payment instrument that meets a
very strict regulation, however the security deposit remains a tumor in the
society that must be uprooted. Although the latter is considered as a
infraction committed by the parties (the sender/receiver) in Morocco (section 1)
it still exists, not only in Morocco, but also in other countries. Good
Of course, each country has its own rights and its own laws, so it is necessary to...
savoir le système pénal du chèque de garantie à la lumière des droits comparés
(section 2).
3Michel Jeantin, commercial law, payment and credit instruments, distressed businesses, Dalloz Delta, E 4,
1995, p 8
4Ibid p 14
5Article 241 Paragraph 1 of the Commercial Code
5
The security check is a check given for a purpose other than the one intended.
by the legislator it is used as a credit instrument because in
In principle, the check is a means of payment on demand, a payment instrument, this
which differentiates it from the bill of exchange. It refers to any check with the intention
the parties' commune should not be presented for immediate payment or should not be.
that has a determined date. Thus, the acceptance of such a check is equivalent to a kind of
in advance of the amount stated on the check granted by the beneficiary for the benefit of
The shooter is required to set aside the provision at the agreed time.6.
Legally, the guarantee check is an illegal act; any guarantee check
presented for payment before the agreed date is considered unpaid due to insufficient
provision. The issuer in this case may find themselves in an embarrassing situation.
It is for this reason that the legislator severely punishes in article 544 of the code
The issuer and the recipient of this check are penalized, as it provides: "Is punishable by penalties
stated in the first paragraph of article 5407from one to five years in prison, and a fine
from 500 to 5,000 DH without the fine being less than the amount of the check,
Anyone who issues or accepts a check on the condition that it is not cashed.
immediately but retained as collateral. These legislative provisions
come to fill the legislative gaps at this level, because the check is
considered more as a means of payment than credit and also as a
formidable pressure tool that the creditor has over the issuer in case of non-
payment8.
On the other hand, article 316 of the commercial code in paragraph 6 provides
that: "any person who, knowingly, agrees to receive or
to endorse a check on the condition that it is not cashed immediately and that it
to be kept as a guarantee a prison sentence of one to five years and
a fine of 2,000 to 10,000 dirhams without this fine being less than
twenty-five percent of the amount of the check. Here the sanction targets only the
beneficiary for the acceptance of the guarantee check and the issuer for another at
to know the issuance of a check for which the funds are nonexistent or insufficient.
The Moroccan Court of Cassation has been decisive regarding the
decriminalization of the offense of the guarantee check at least on the part of the drawee, that is how it is
in its landmark ruling delivered in a joint session of two chambers on 29/05/2005, it has
confirmed the implicit abrogation of the provisions of article 544 of the penal code by the
6[Link] 27/10/2021
7Article 540: Anyone who, in order to obtain or to provide to a third party, an illegitimate financial profit, induces
deviously misleading a person with fallacious claims, or by concealing true facts, or
cleverly exploit the mistake where a person was and thus determine them to actions harmful to their interests
Those who are guilty of fraud involving monetary issues or those of a third party are punishable by imprisonment for one to five years and a fine.
from 500 to 5,000 dirhams
826ﻱﻥﻝ ﻛﺮﺓﺫﻡ
ﺭﻟﻤﺎﺳﺖﺍ ﺩﺓﻫﺎﺵﻝ، ﺍﻝﺩﺍﻙﻣﺲﻟﺨﺎﺍ ﺣﻤﺪﻡ ﺓﻣﻊﺟﺎ، ﻉﺭﻱﻟﺘﺶﺍ ﺑﻴﻦﻥﻟﻀﻤﺎﺍ ﻳﻚﺵ، ﻟﻘﻀﺎﺋﻴﺔﺍ ﻟﻤﻤﺎﺭﺳﺔﺍﻭ ﻉﻭﺍﻕﺍﻝ2012-2011 ﺹ
6
articles 316 and following of the commercial code advocating in a specific case
particularly the retroactive application of the milder law9.
The Court of Cassation decided not to pursue criminal action against the issuer.
a signed blank check "as long as it is proven by expertise that the amount
it is supposed that the provision has not been set by him10.
For the commission of this offense, the meeting of two essential elements is
mandatory: a material element and a moral element.
The material element: is the acceptance of receiving or endorsing a check.
provided that it is not cashed immediately.
The moral element: the offense is the intention not to cash the check
immediately.
In this regard, a movement founded by Professor CHOKRI SBAII.11comes to strengthen the
position of the legislator who incriminates the offense of the guarantee check, which does not
do not consider that the provisions of article 316 of the commercial code have been repealed
those of article 544 of the penal code.
On the other hand, another approach adopted by Professors EL FAROUJJI and AL HARTI
who is advocating for the decriminalization of the guarantee check due to the utility of the check in
commercial transactions.
In other foreign legislation, some of them opt for the
pénalisation du chèque de garantie et autres qui partent à la dépénalisation de ce
last.
917197/95ﺍﺉﻥﺝﺍﻝ
ﻑﻝﻟﻢﺍﻱ2002 ﻱﺍﻡ29 ﺭﺩﺍﺹﺍﻝﻓﺘﻴﻦﺭﺑﻎ ﻳﺦﺑﺘﺎﺭ1263/6 ﺭﺭﺍﻟﻖﺍ ﺩﺩﻉ
10Consultthe guarantee check: The issuers protected by jurisprudence.
27/10/2021
113ﺏﺱﺍﻝﻱﺭﻙﺵ ﻣﺪﺡ
ﺓﺑﻊﻁ ﺑﺎﻁﺭﺍﻝ ﺓﺩﻱﺩﺝﺍﻝﻑﺍﺭﻉﻟﻢﺍ ﺓﻣﻄﺒﻊﻧﻲﻟﺜﺎﺍ ﺯﺀﺝﺍﻝ" ﺓﻱﺍﺭﺝﻟﺖﺍﻕﺍﻷﻭﺭﺍﻱﻑ ﻁﺳﻲﻭﺍﻝ "ﻱﻉﺍ2010 ﺹ
7
SECTION 2: The penal system of the guarantee cheque in light of the law
compared
We will address the positions of European legislation by studying the French model.
as comparative law of the subject.
The law "December 30, 1991"12has repealed the act of issuing a check without
provision13and replaced it with a civil penalty that obliges the payer to make the payment
a fine and preventing it from issuing new checks.
The guarantee check is only an arrangement between the parties that, by
its simplicity retains a real appeal in practice, from which it is not
considered as an offense in France. For Christian Gavalda and Jean
Stoufflet, "a check cannot of course fulfill a credit function"
» 14and Michel Juglar warned that a deposit check "does not bear any
guarantee for the creditor15.
Mr. Ahmed CHOKRI SBAII explains that French legislation has
decriminalized the guarantee check due to the complexity of the offense of its presentation and
the spread of its use16.
Among the provisions that state that a check is a means of payment is that
The beneficiary can present it for payment, even if it is given to him as collateral.
Moreover, French legislation does not sanction, according to the 1991 law, the act of
to accept the check without funds, this crime is committed with criminal intent,
represented in the act of voluntarily accepting a check as a guarantee without
provision after its issuance, in order to harm or prejudice the issuer. Except that the
12Law no. 91-1382 of December 30, 1991, official journal of the French Republic of January 1, 1991.
13Christian GAVALDA and Jean STOUFFLET, 'Commercial paper, checks, payment and credit cards', Litec-
Paris, 3rd edition, 1998, p 306.
14HESPRESS/ Christian GAVALDA and Jean STOUFFLET, [Link]., P 206.
15HESPRESS/Michel JUGLART and Benjamin IPPOLITO, [Link]., P 242.
16
ﻋﻲﻟﺴﺒﺎﺍﻱﺭﻙﺵ ﺃﺣﻤﺪ، “ﺟﺎﺭﻳﺔﺕﺍﻝﻕﺍﻷﻭﺭﺍ ﻓﻲ ﻟﻮﺳﻴﻂﺍ/ﻱﻟﺜﺎﻥﺍ ﻟﺠﺰﺀﺍ: ﻑﻟﻮﺍﺕﺍﺃﺩﻭ ﺃﻭ ﺁﻟﻴﺎﺕ ﻓﻲ
ﺍﺀ: ”ﻷﺧﺮﻯﺍ ﺀﺍﻷﺩﺍﻝﻭﻭﺳﺎﺉ ﻟﺸﻴﻚﺍ، ﻑﻟﻤﻌﺎﺭﺍ ﻣﻄﺒﻌﺔ
323ﺓﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪﺍ- ﻟﺮﺑﺎﻁﺍ، ﻯﻷﻭﺍﻝ ﻟﻄﺒﻌﺔﺍ1998 ﺹ.
8
legislation still punishes the act of withdrawing the provision after the check is issued or
the act of accepting a bounced check after it has been issued, except that it
requires the assertion of the bad faith of the acceptor17.
According to French doctrine and according to Christian Gavalda and Jean Stoufflet,
in their work "Effects of Commerce" that the acceptance of a check to
condition that it is held as collateral may constitute a criminal practice,
which is unfortunately present in society, and that the check cannot be
un moyen de crédit. En revanche Reed Business Information, spécialisée dans la
dissemination of legal and economic information to the public, it is admitted that "
the guarantee check has become admissible, that is to say the beneficiary has the
right to submit the check for immediate payment, even if he commits to
do not do it.
For jurisprudence, on its part, a ruling of the French Court of Cassation in 22-
09-2015 N14-17.90118regarding the cashing of a check of
guarantee. A brief summary can be given about this matter. It concerns a
issuer of a non-dated check of 500,000 euros which he had given to his beneficiary
in guarantee of a loan of the same amount. The loan has not been repaid, so the
The beneficiary wrote the date, then he submitted the check for payment after two years.
since its creation. The issuer opposed paying the check, considering that
the subsequent placement of a false date with the aim of allowing its presentation to
payment without limitation of duration and in order to avoid the prescription constituted
fraudulent use, knowing that in another case law it has already been judged
that a check given as a guarantee does not constitute an offense.
Furthermore, if the check must contain the indication of the date of its creation, the Court of
cassation ruled that, even if postdated, it produces the effects of a check. It follows that
therefore, the deposit of a post-dated guarantee check does not constitute
not in itself a fraudulent use justifying the opposition.
17 26ﻛﺮﺓﺫﻡ
ﺭﻟﻤﺎﺳﺖﺍ ﺩﺓﻫﺎﺵﻝﻱﻥﻝ، ﺍﻝﺩﺍﻙﻣﺲﻟﺨﺎﺍ ﺣﻤﺪﻡ ﺓﻣﻊﺟﺎ، ﻉﺭﻱﻟﺘﺶﺍ ﺑﻴﻦﻥﻟﻀﻤﺎﺍ ﻳﻚﺵ، ﻟﻘﻀﺎﺋﻴﺔﺍ ﻟﻤﻤﺎﺭﺳﺔﺍﻭ ﻉﻭﺍﻕﺍﻝ2012-2011 ﺹ
[Link]. 22-9-2015 n°14-17.901
19The Permanent Manual of Tunisian Business Law, Nov. 2008 P-5
9
CHAPTER 2: the security check between risks and the difficulty of
Proof
2026ﻛﺮﺓﺫﻡ ﺭﻟﻤﺎﺳﺖﺍ ﺩﺓﻫﺎﺵﻝﻱﻥﻝ، ﺍﻝﺩﺍﻙﻣﺲﻟﺨﺎﺍ ﺣﻤﺪﻡ ﺓﻣﻊﺟﺎ، ﻉﺭﻱﻟﺘﺶﺍ ﺑﻴﻦﻥﻟﻀﻤﺎﺍ ﻳﻚﺵ، ﻟﻘﻀﺎﺋﻴﺔﺍ ﻟﻤﻤﺎﺭﺳﺔﺍﻭ ﻉﻭﺍﻕﺍﻝ2012-2011 ﺹ
10
It should be specified that not only those who use it in this way, even the big ones
companies resort to this practice terribly.
The traders provide various justifications for this illegal practice, they
they think that this will be an excuse for them and even exonerate them from the
criminal liability21.
Citizens have made their voices heard on social media, denouncing the use
current of this practice by private care structures. This controversy had
spawnedthe reaction of Khalid Aït Taleb,Minister of Health. The latter had
reminded that from a legal standpoint, in accordance with article 75 of law 131.13 related to
in the practice of medicine, "it is prohibited for the clinic, in the case of third-party payment, to
ask insured individuals or their beneficiaries for a cash guarantee, by
check or any other means of payment outside of the portion remaining for their responsibility
"And to add that this practice is the result of the absence of a system"
electronic device allowing access to the data held by companies
insurance to know whether the patient is insured by a company or not. Note that
2126ﻛﺮﺓﺫﻡ ﺭﻟﻤﺎﺳﺖﺍ ﺩﺓﻫﺎﺵﻝﻱﻥﻝ، ﺍﻝﺩﺍﻙﻣﺲﻟﺨﺎﺍ ﺣﻤﺪﻡ ﺓﻣﻊﺟﺎ، ﻉﺭﻱﻟﺘﺶﺍ ﺑﻴﻦﻥﻟﻀﻤﺎﺍ ﻳﻚﺵ، ﻟﻘﻀﺎﺋﻴﺔﺍ ﻟﻤﻤﺎﺭﺳﺔﺍﻭ ﻉﻭﺍﻕﺍﻝ2012-2011 ﺹ
22[Link]
23Guarantee check: stop the bleeding! By SARA OUZIAN
11
in order to respond to the outrage and complaints of Moroccans, the ministry
The Ministry of Health has made available to them a complaint portal called Allo Chikayati.
The objective is to penalize offenders in case of violation through the Order of
doctors, waiting to find a viable solution to the illegal practices of
certain private clinics.24
On the other hand, Professor Redouane Semlali, President of the national association
private clinics (ANCP) expressed support for this guarantee instrument
of payment during a media outing "certainly, it is an act prohibited by law but
which greatly facilitates the admission of patients in very serious situations
adding that "the clinic directors are always trying to find a solution
with the patient or their family to settle the file.
And to escape the criminal penalty, "some clinics cash the check.
immediately, he noted, adding that some checks are made out to
benefit from nominees in order not to be reported to the tax authorities.
However, these subterfuges are merely a reckless escape in the face of citizens' rights.
to receive dignified care at reasonable prices, while allowing clinics
to cover their costs and generate a profit like any business," pointed out Mr.
Arji, also president of the Business Support Commission of the Chamber
French Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Morocco (CFCIM)25.
According to the law, "Any commitment arising from an abuse is deemed null by the force of the law.
weakness or ignorance of the consumer, who reserves the right to be
reimburse the amounts paid and be compensated for the damages suffered.26,
as stated in Article 59 of Law 31.08 on the protection of
consumers. The same article emphasizes the preservation of the right of
consumer who subscribed to a bond by exploiting their weakness or their
ignorance, to recover the amounts paid by himself and to compensate him for the
subsequent damages.
This situation applies to the case of citizens who are forced to submit to
security deposits to private clinics, given that the latter is in
position of strength, while the consumer is in a state of weakness.
Finally, we can quickly address the practice of the security deposit cheque used at
during a car rental, the owner requests a deposit of a check for
caution which will be used, if necessary, to repair any damages suffered by the property
rented (this can also be furniture / real estate). This check will be valid
immediately collected by the service provider, professional or individual28.
Indeed, the check remains a means of payment and the misuse that is made of it in the
The practice has not been validated by the courts.
In cases where the evidence has been established, the competent jurisdictions condemn.
in the case of non-existent or insufficient provision, the drawer for the offense of issuance
of a bounced check, and the beneficiary of the offense of accepting a check of
guarantee. In the event that the provision existed at the time of the check issuance,
the acceptor will be prosecuted for the acceptance of the check given as a guarantee and
the issuer for its issuance in accordance with the provisions of Article 544 of the code
penal.
The difficulty of proving the incrimination of the guarantee check persists in the
means used by the beneficiary to escape the provisions of the law on
the acceptance of the guarantee check.
Regarding case law, the Court of Cassation in ruling no. 1343 Date
from 06/03/1996, specify: as long as the signature on the check is not disputed by the
From this logic, there is an overlap between the offense of issuing a check without
supply and the guarantee check, where often the drawer is caught for an offense
to issue the check without funds, the beneficiary is acquitted of the offense of
the acceptance of the guarantee check based on the issue of the difficulty of proving the
bad faith of the latter.
So proving the bad faith of the beneficiary is a realistic problem for the authority.
judiciary, where this could be a claim from the drawer that the beneficiary
accept a check as a guarantee. This is a malicious act aimed at repudiating
the bearer and have him introduced into a circle of guarantee check crime, He
belongs to the court to search for clues that may help it achieve the
truth30.
30 2015-2014,ﻥﻟﻀﻤﺎﺍ ﻳﻚﺵ ﻣﺔﺭﻱﺝ ﺣﻮﻝﺭﺽﻉ، ﺍﻝﺩﺍﻙ ﺑﺎﻁﺭﺑﺎﻝﻣﺲﻟﺨﺎﺍ ﺣﻤﺪﻡ ﺓﻣﻊﺟﺎ، ﺭﻭﻙﺏ ﻟﻤﺨﺘﺎﺭﺍ ﺭﻭﺕﻙﻟﺪﺍﻑﺍﺷﺮﺍﺕﺡﺕ
15
CONCLUSION
Ultimately, the security deposit remains difficult to prove due to the ambiguity of.
its function and the complexity of its repressive system. In this regard, efforts have been made
permanently by case law in the face of this practice which constitutes a
tumor that needs to be removed.
16
BIBLIOGRAPHY
WORKS
Michel Jeantin, commercial law, payment and credit instruments,
companies in difficulty, Dalloz Delta, E 4, 1995
Piedelièvre, Stéphane,Payment and Credit Instruments Ed. 10,Dalloz,
2018
Giudicelli-Delage, GenevièveBusiness Criminal Law Ed. 6Dalloz, 2006
ﻱﻉﺍﺏﺱﺍﻝﻱﺭﻙﺵ ﻣﺪﺡﺃ، “ﺓﻱﺍﺭﺝﻟﺖﺍﻕﺍﻷﻭﺭﺍﻱﻑ ﻁﺳﻲﻭﺍﻝ/ﻧﻲﻟﺜﺎﺍ ﺯﺀﺝﺍﻝ: ﻓﺎﺀﻭﺍﻝﺍﺕﻭﺩﺃ ﺃﻭﺕﺁﻟﻴﺎﻱﻑ: ﻟﺸﻴﻚﺍ
1998”ﻯﺭﺥﻷﺍ ﺀﺩﺍﻷﺍﻝﻭﻭﺳﺎﺉ، ﺓﺩﻱﺩﺝﺍﻝﻑﺍﺭﻉﻟﻢﺍ ﺓﻣﻄﺒﻊ- ﺑﺎﻁﺭﺍﻝ، ﻯﻷﻭﺍﻝ ﺓﻃﺒﻊﺍﻝ
MEMORY
ﺭﻟﻤﺎﺳﺖﺍ ﺩﺓﻫﺎﺵﻝﻱﻥﻝ ﻛﺮﺓﺫﻡ، ﺍﻝﺩﺍﻙﻣﺲﻟﺨﺎﺍ ﺣﻤﺪﻡ ﺓﻣﻊﺟﺎ، ﻉﺭﻱﻟﺘﺶﺍ ﺑﻴﻦﻥﻟﻀﻤﺎﺍ ﻳﻚﺵ، ﻟﻤﻤﺎﺭﺳﺔﺍﻭ ﻉﻭﺍﻕﺍﻝ
2012-2011ﻟﻘﻀﺎﺋﻴﺔﺍ
Legal texts
WEBOGRAPHY
[Link]
of guarantee
[Link]
by juriprudence/
[Link]
[Link]
guarantee-70995
[Link]
guarantee-stop-the-hemorrhage/
[Link]
[Link]
the-guarantee-in-clinics-or-not-is-prohibited/
17