0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views3 pages

Understanding Deviance and Crime

Uploaded by

beantownhung
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
12 views3 pages

Understanding Deviance and Crime

Uploaded by

beantownhung
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Chapter 7 Notes

I. Defining Deviance
 Deviance = Any behavior, belief, or condition that violates social norms and elicits a
negative reaction.
o Can be formal (breaking laws) or informal (violating social expectations).

 Deviance is relative — what is deviant varies by culture, time, context, and power
structure.
II. What is Crime?
 Crime = A violation of formal laws enforced by the state.
 All crime is deviance, but not all deviance is crime.
o Example: Talking loudly in a library is deviant but not criminal.

III. The Social Construction of Deviance


 Deviance is not inherent in the act — it is defined by social reactions. (Labeling
Perspective)
 Power dynamics play a role — Dominant groups define what is “normal” vs “deviant.”
IV. Sociological Theories of Deviance

Theory Key Idea Example

Structural/Functional Deviance is necessary to reinforce Punishing criminals reaffirms


(Durkheim) norms and enable social change. social values.

Deviance arises from gap between


Strain Theory (Merton) Poverty → theft as adaptation.
goals and means.

Deviance learned in groups with


Subcultural Theory Gang culture.
alternative values.

Those involved in
Social Control Theory Strong bonds to society prevent
school/church less likely to
(Hirschi) deviance.
offend.

Differential Association Deviance is learned through


Peer influence.
(Sutherland) interaction.

Deviance is applied by labels, not “Criminal” label → self-


Labeling Theory (Becker)
inherent. fulfilling prophecy.
Theory Key Idea Example

Conflict Theory (Marxist) Laws protect powerful groups. Poor punished more than rich.

Deviance defined by male-


Feminist Theories Sex work laws target women.
dominated norms.

V. Types of Crime

Category Description Example

Violent Crime Force or threat used Murder, assault

Property Crime No direct force Theft, burglary

White-Collar Crime Nonviolent, financial Fraud, embezzlement

Corporate Crime Crime by organizations Price-fixing, pollution

Victimless Crime Illegal but no obvious victim Drug use, gambling

Hate Crimes Targeted by race, gender, etc. Bias-driven violence

Cybercrime Computer-based offenses Hacking, identity theft

VI. Social Responses to Crime


Criminal Justice System Components
 Law Enforcement — Police and surveillance.
 Courts — Prosecution, defense, sentencing.
 Corrections — Prisons, jails, probation.
VII. Punishment Philosophies

Philosophy Purpose

Retribution Payback / moral vengeance

Deterrence Prevent future crime

Rehabilitation Reform offender

Incapacitation Remove threat from society

VIII. Mass Incarceration and Inequality


 U.S. has highest incarceration rate globally.
 Disproportionate impact on Black, Latino, and low-income individuals.
 Privatized prisons profit from imprisonment.
IX. Alternatives to Punishment
 Restorative Justice — Repairs harm through mediation.
 Diversion Programs — Counseling or treatment instead of jail.
 Decriminalization — Removing legal penalties (e.g., marijuana laws).

Common questions

Powered by AI

Feminist theories provide insights into how deviance is defined and regulated in societies with male-dominated norms, often using laws to control and marginalize women. For example, sex work laws predominantly target women, reflecting broader societal biases. By highlighting these inequities, feminist theories call for reevaluating how deviations from male-centric social norms are perceived and handled, advocating for gender-equitable legal and social frameworks .

Hate crimes and cybercrimes reflect evolving societal concerns focusing on bias-driven actions and digital security. Hate crimes highlight deep-seated societal prejudices and the need for laws addressing discrimination-based violence, while cybercrimes illustrate contemporary challenges posed by technological advancements, necessitating robust legal frameworks for protection against digital threats. These categories underscore the dynamic nature of societal security concerns in the face of cultural and technological changes .

The labeling perspective posits that deviance is not inherent in an act but is the result of social reactions—specifically labels applied by others. Power dynamics are crucial in this process because dominant groups in society have the authority to define what is considered 'normal' and 'deviant.' By labeling certain behaviors as deviant, these groups can enforce norms to maintain control and reinforce social hierarchies .

Distinguishing between formal and informal deviance is significant in understanding societal responses. Formal deviance, involving law violations, is met with official sanctions by legal authorities, while informal deviance, which breaches social expectations, typically results in social censure or ostracism. This distinction impacts response strategies, determining whether a legal or social corrective approach is adopted .

Corporate crimes are illegal acts committed by companies or their representatives designed to benefit the corporation, such as price-fixing and pollution, whereas white-collar crimes are nonviolent crimes committed by individuals, typically for financial gain, such as fraud and embezzlement. Both types of crime highlight the discrepancies in how offenses are prosecuted and punished compared to other crimes, often resulting in less severe penalties, reflecting biases within the justice system favoring affluent offenders .

Subcultural theory suggests that deviance is learned within groups that uphold alternative values to mainstream society. Within gang culture, members are socialized into values and norms that promote behaviors divergent from societal expectations. Such group dynamics legitimize and reinforce deviant acts like violence or unlawful activities, illustrating how sub-cultural affiliations can influence individuals toward deviance as part of identity and community adherence .

Strain Theory, proposed by Merton, suggests that deviant behavior emerges when there is a disjunction between societal goals and the means available to achieve them. This gap creates pressure, or 'strain,' leading individuals, particularly those in disadvantaged positions, to engage in deviance. For instance, poverty may lead to theft as a way to cope with the inability to achieve financial success through legitimate means .

Social Control Theory posits that strong bonds to societal institutions, such as family, school, and religious organizations, reduce the likelihood of deviant behavior. These bonds encourage adherence to social norms and values, deterring individuals from engaging in activities considered socially unacceptable. Conversely, weaker social ties may increase susceptibility to deviance due to a lack of attachment to these institutions .

The criminal justice system's focus on retribution emphasizes punishment over rehabilitation, aiming for moral vengeance or 'payback.' This philosophy can drive higher incarceration rates, as it does not address the root causes of crime or provide pathways for offender reintegration. Consequently, it disproportionately affects minority groups, who may already be targeted by systemic inequalities and biases. This retributive focus facilitates a cycle of imprisonment, especially among Black, Latino, and low-income individuals, thus contributing to mass incarceration .

Restorative justice focuses on repairing harm through processes like mediation, where offenders and victims engage in dialogue. This model emphasizes accountability, community involvement, and rehabilitation, contrasting with traditional punitive models. By addressing the causes and effects of crime, restorative justice can reduce recidivism as it seeks to reintegrate offenders into the community, promoting understanding and healing rather than mere punishment .

You might also like