0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views8 pages

Accounting for Replacement Awards in Acquisitions

Uploaded by

pakwired1
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views8 pages

Accounting for Replacement Awards in Acquisitions

Uploaded by

pakwired1
Copyright
© All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

me

SD PAYMENT REPLACEMENT -
AWARDS ON ACQUISITION

Itis
*
possible thattheacquiring company may replace theshare
based in the
paymentscheme of employees acquired company.

summple SBP Pre-acquisition
=>

rye.
·
cost c
of D e

expenses.
- -
Buy-out.

$12 -

prom -
-

share-based scheme
-

-year acquisition. Etisitat (3yrs ->


Eyrs have

already
wants to replace existing passed)
share-based scheme its
from Goodwil
-

own shares. consideratio -


/100 + 10) 110.

↓ Less:FV
of NA of [Link]

So
technically, they buy existing 400will
>
equity
to
rights from employees

=> Services before acquisition date=> Pre-acquisition Fair value of


SBP is taken as

consideration
by Acquiring
Co

Services daleis Post- acquisition


after acquisition Normal
-
=>

treatment in Post
Pul/RE.
Y
3483
back I ↓ Sy 0
100% NCI
*We post bec
,
=

ABC
company has justacquired hares
a
e

of
Sub. Co.
for gloom,
--
-

cash. As 100% the shares acquired there will


paid in
-
of all were

be no non-controlling interests. Three


yearsago, sub. Lo had
granted
thatwere in
equity options to its
staff due to rest
give years
(i.e. further two
years). awards of it's
ABC
company has provided reement own

company
shares thatwill restin
further 2
years. Fair value

$51 million, whereas, the


of these
replacementawards was

awards postion.
fair value
of original was
- -

Required. How Rachel will account


for replacementawards.
the
FV
of replacementawards -
451m.
FU the SOPS $25m
of original 5y.
-
Pre combination value of option (of original awards)
before
->
Any fair
the date
of acquisition
[Link].
is treated as cost
of
acquiring
Cost
of Acquisition 25m
= x
3/5 $15m
=

-
=> services thathave

performed
-

been
already acq

Post-acquisition =
($51-$15m) 932m =
=> is the
fair
value
of
awards
replacement

Treatmentunder
Afey
Normal

p36m y2
x =418m ->
recognised IFRs. 2.
in 4r.

Azur
is at 36m
=

x2/2 36m
=

Jess:Already
Recog:
FTY
18m
-
Luploid co -> Hammond Co.

Shares Consideration:10m shares x boy.


~Si shares-> shares acquired.
a shares 2.4m shares x$30
-hanen x =

=$72m

consideration
x to be
paid to acquire 60%
of Hammond lo

is $72m.

Preferred Approach (is briefly


and
3
=>

steps mention explain le

IFRS.

This
of
willcontext es.
suplain
=> Put
(i) conclude

SOFP.
=>

According
=>
to IERS-2, in case the
acquirer awards replacent
share based scheme
employees of targetto, itis similar
to

IFRS-2
to as
if buying further equity. Therefore, per fair as

of any pre-acquisition services provided for


value SBP is to

be considered 'cost business combination'


as
of
In thecase
of acquisition of Hammond Co, the
fair value
d
45m which should be made
already vested IS SBP is part
The difference
of costof business combination. fair value

of $3m (918-$15) shall be treated as a


post acquire
-

shall be
expense
and
recognized immediately since there is no
further
westing condition.
conditions
Vesting +
9SSBPs => Man X

-
- Service

gignored
condition market-based condition

es
3

x 100 options x 96%


ig
- While

and
because
Ikier
its
conditions

is

included in
impactis already
x $20 2
x
FU
of option &
grat
dale.

- 9,600,000.

Expense 9,600,000
9,600,000.
Equity
Option
cash
-

IFRS Settlement
-

2 shares
H
-

Two
possible scenarios

Entity
has a choice
Counterparty has a choice

Employee Notan
Employee

① Where
Company has the choice

are
ithas
Anentityshall treatthetransaction, assette if
an

is the shares;or
company
cannotissue
further
Ithas stated in
(ii) a
policy
or
pastpractice of settling cast.

Otherwise, itis considered as


equity-settled.
=>
② Instrument.
Where
counterparty has the
choice compound financial

I I
Formal
Liability Equity
or services(xxx
Fair value
of instrument
goods ↓

xix)ina
CS SBP ES SBP
of
cash alternative

Fatue
Less:

sampox, Smeaton
grants an
employee rightto choose eillier 20,000
e n

shares
-
OM Eee20x4 cash
or
for 18,000 shares
-
e
atthat
date. The

employee
must remain
employed on 30 June 20x4. mepricey o

[Link]*neg"
shares isto
1 July X 30Jx2 30J43 30 jx4

⑪ I
I I

FU
of shares 20,000 shares 4.90 98,000
=
x =

FU Cash 18,000 shares X 5 90,000 -I CS SBP


of =
-
->
>

SBP.
equity option
ES
8000->
Cash-settled SBP
Equity-settled SBP

3 jure x2 30 june x2 (5.35)


=$8000 1/3
x 2667
=

Emp2667 =
18,000 shares 5.35
x x
(/z 32,100
=

3.02667

Sup 32,100
liab is

30 June x3 30 June x3 (5.80)


8000
=
213
x 5333
-

U 18000
~
shares 5.80
x x
43 69,600
=

Less:A
Recognised:(1) Less:A. R 200)
-

FTY 2667
=
37,
Sup 37,500
Liab u

30 June x4 30 June xY (6.103


3/3 8000 =109,800
=
8800 y =

H
=18000 6.10
x
3/3
x

A. R 53)
-
Less:A.R -600
Fit FYY 40,200
2667 2

You might also like